I’ve received several notifications that Rand Paul, Ron Paul’s son, is officially lending his “support” to Mitt Romney and will be campaigning for the Romney bid for the presidency. Of course, this came as no surprise to me or to those others who’ve been persecuted for our expose’s on presidential candidate Ron Paul (and family). Many of these notes state that Ron Paul himself has or will “sell out” the people who supported him via this clandestine nepotism.
But can you sell out if you never bought in?
Can you win if you never plan to?
Over the last year or so, billions of dollars have been pumped into the Democratic and Republican Party nomination process for President of the United States of America. This process is for some reason considered normal to most Americans. And yet, let’s look at a few facts:
1) The Republican and Democratic Parties are 100% private non-governmental associations.
2) The winner of these private “elections” have absolutely nothing to do with the lawful and constitutional election process that takes place once every four years in November.
3) The men or women who are chosen to actually run for president represent the interests of the party, not the people of the United States.
4) The outcome of these private association elections is pre-determined. Men are primed for these positions well in advance. Romney is no exception. This is not illegal, as the election is for a private, non-governmental corporation.
5) Mitt Romney, John Huntsman, Bush, Cheney, Obama, Biden, Sarah Palin, John McCain, and all other past presidents are cousins. These private associations serve no other purpose than to place bloodline family members into the presidency, and to ensure that the right/left candidates are cousins – so as to ensure the continuity of blood.
6) Mitt Romney has already announced over 20 duel-Israeli citizens for his cabinet – many of the same men and women from the Bush Cabinet. (Of course, Romney and Bush are 10th cousins, only twice removed, so naturally they are just keeping it in the family tradition.)
So why was Ron Paul running for the Republican private corporation (Party) nomination and not as a free and independent man?
A Libertarian and a Republican are not the same thing, are they?
Perhaps this may help explain things…
For many months I and others have tried in vein to show the inevitable outcome of the Republican nomination. For many years, several former Ron Paul regional campaign managers and myself have been asking: What happened to the over $40 million from the 2008 Ron Paul campaign? I’ve exposed the fact that Ron Paul’s “Audit The Fed Bill” is a red herring, which would not change anything about the already existing audit of the Fed (the CAFR). And for all of this time I’ve been exposing Paul’s lack of coverage of the CAFR accounting system of government, and that the Federal Reserve is now and always has been audited…
And for this I’ve gotten a majority response of irrationality and negativity despite the verifiable facts presented. And even as millions upon millions were given to the Ron Paul “campaign” this year by well-intentioned but naive people, I received virtually no support for my own efforts to run as an independent man for president, not a private corporation (party) shill, and the people who could actually fix this country are either destitute or in jail, with no one standing up for their freedom.
I’m here to say today to those who claim to be awake, that you need to realize your disposition – you are in a dream within a dream…
Ron Paul is a Republican Party member. His family’s nepotistic loyalty to this non-governmental private association over the people of America is apparent through this action of his son’s official support for Mitt Romney – a fake enemy yesterday, a real friend today. Dr. Paul will follow with his concession and his support, like a good party member. No amount of words; no amount of anti-war speeches; no amount of anti-banking or anti-FED propaganda; and no amount of anti-Romney/Bush/Obama rhetoric and speeches will change this fact.
Break free… the party system is the death of the American election process. Electing a party member equals electing an entire private, non-governmental association as president. It means electing a corporation, not a man. And AT BEST it means that only party members are represented, leaving at least 50% of the people and their children without any representation at all.
Check out these family trees, and please rethink your vote for the same old bloodline cousins of the Queen of England (now supported by Rand Paul) this year:
Retraction: After many quite personal attacks on my character, it has been pointed out to me that the “gold” in question is pledged to the Federal Reserve specifically as collateral, meaning that the Treasury must pay the contract if the Federal Reserve calls in the “collateral”. I don’t mind being wrong, and will always endeavor to correct such mistakes. But I must say the abuse is intolerable (in the comments below) from what are supposed to be the good guys; “the people”. This gives little hope of our future as an organized group of people. I apologize for being tricked by this misleading writing, and hope to correct that here:
Here is a comment from Walter Burien, correcting my error:
The report Clint sent out was a trap he fell into after certain circumstances of reporting changed to hide the assignment of the Treasury gold to the FR.
Most would not have caught the word play for misrepresentation now revised in the reports including maybe myself if I looked for the first time now. Being that I looked over a decade ago, that is why I caught it.
In reference to Clint: “This is the problem with most Americans today.” and that is 99% not accurate in reference to Clint.
He has done what 1 out of a million would do and that is take the time and have the intelligence; fortitude; and will to “look”. We all get caught in traps from time to time. You should not diminish him for having done so…
Note 19 on page 101: “Notes to the Financial Statements” and line item values listed.
Page 102. The key phrase is the last sentence:
“All of the Department of the Treasury’s certificates issued are payable to the Federal Reserve banks.”
Being gold certificates issued by the Treasury, the word “payable” means payable in gold.
Now I did notice they are doing something differently then they were doing in 1999. They are now “floating” the certificates back and forth between the federal reserve member banks redeemable in dollars and foreign currency. There is no physical gold that changes hands, just the paper certificates. I mentioned to look at the 1999 Federal AFR being the wording and the swaps of certificates were not being done then and there was no word play. The “gold was pledged to the Federal reserve by “gold certificates” to do what they do. If the Federal Reserve called up those certificates, the FR got the gold in redemption of those certificates.
As I mentioned I put out a CAFR1 post eight years ago on that point and Opps, the gang had to cover their asses in extended word play and the new certificate swaps to blur what they did in the “give up” of the gold by certificates issued at $42 oz.
Hell probably hit the fan when the full Congress and the Senate realized what had been done and thus implemented the gold certificate swaps to generate money for the Treasury.
If the Federal Reserve had ever “called up” the original certificates issued and took possession of the gold, the Treasury would not have had the ability to profit off the gold certificate swaps. The treasury would no longer have the gold in their possession to do so. I note the gold certificates is a VERY small percentage of the value listed in the Federal Reserve’s AFR.
Being that I now have had to focus on this issue, I now understand the play push to audit the Federal Reserve “members” of if which done would collapse the Federal Reserve’s participation of and from member banks. It was used as a pressure point to accomplish several points. One to force the FR into taking on more US Debt between the members (as the increase is noted in both the FR and Federal Government’s AFR report’s notes) and also probably to force the ability to use the gold certificates (never redeemed for the physical gold) through in and out swaps in trade mandating return of the certificates (owned by the FR) on call where the “Treasury” directly benefited from that activity.
–Walter
***Note that Walter alludes to the most important aspect here: the collusion – not competition – between the Federal Reserve and the Treasury. And the gold, of course, can’t just be ignored. It is the peoples wealth pledged without acquiescence to contract.
.
And here was the original post:
It is always good to know that the sacrifices I’ve made and the endless hours of research I’ve done don’t just fall on deaf ears…
I received an email a couple of days ago from a reader of my blog, who went above and beyond the call of duty to verify the research in my recent videos, not just taking it at face value. If only all of us did this with each others research, we would no doubt have a whole lot less confusion in our search for “truth”.
Besides my gratitude, I would also offer this man my highest accommodation of valor (if I had one) for taking the time to not only find the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR’s) I mentioned, but to read them and link them in his email.
Thank you, sir!
I’d like to share that email here…
“John Smith” wrote:
————————
–Begin excerpt–
————————
Fact: The Federal Reserve Notes are backed by gold.
Yes, you read that right. The Federal Reserve notes are backed by gold.
Hitler (Joseph Goebbels) was right when he said, “If you repeat a lie enough times, people will believe it (paraphrase).”
I know what you are thinking. OK, John. Prove it.
If you look at page 453 and 490 of the 2009 Annual Financial Report of the Federal Reserve (CAFR) you will see there actually is collateral held against Federal Reserve Notes. This means the money we use is backed by something.
How many (troy) ounces (of gold) is backing the Federal Reserve Notes? On page 62, the last paragraph reads:
“Gold is valued at the statutory price of $42.2222 per fine troy ounce. The number of fine troy ounces was 261,498,900 as of September 30, 2010, and 2009. The market value of gold on the London Fixing was $1,307 and $996 per fine troy ounce as of September 30, 2010, and 2009, respectively. Gold totaling $11.1 billion as of September 30, 2010, and 2009, was pledged as collateral for gold certificates issued and authorized to the FRBs by the Secretary of the Treasury. Gold certificates were valued at $11.0 billion as of September 30, 2010, and 2009, which are included in Note 19—Other Liabilities. Treasury may redeem the gold certificates at any time. Foreign currency is translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate at fiscal year-end. The foreign currency is maintained by various U.S. Federal agencies and foreign banks.”
How much money (Federal Reserve Notes) is in circulation?
All of that hard and easily liquidated currency is known as the M0 money supply. This includes the bills and coins in people’s pockets and mattresses, the money on hand in bank vaults and all of the deposits those banks have at reserve banks. According to the Federal Reserve, there was $908.6 billion in the M0 supply stream as of July 2009.
What is the real value of the Federal Reserve Notes?
This can be viewed 2 ways (statutory value or market value).
Let’s do some calculating:
The statutory price of gold is $42.2222 per ounce. The Fed is holding 261,498,900 ounces of gold This equals to $11,041,058,855.58 ($11 billion). There is $908,600,000,000 ($908 billion) in circulation. According to the statutory price of gold, the dollar is worth $.012 (Just over 1 cent per dollar).
The market price of gold is $1,307.00 per ounce. The Fed is holding 261,498,900 ounces of gold. This equals to $341,779,062,300.00 ($341.7 billion). There are $908,600,000,000 ($908 billion) in circulation. According to the market price of gold, the dollar is worth $0.37 (37 cents per dollar).
(Note: The average market price of gold is actually over $1,600 for November)
I guess the dollar really isn’t worth a dollar (in gold).
Warning: My lack of funds are being compensated by my knowledge.
———————-
–End excerpt–
———————-
Again, my congratulations to John for taking the initiative to research and verify the facts (instead of just insulting the messenger).
.
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, November 21, 2011
I have had an amazing look into the paradigm of institutionalization ever since I began speaking negatively about the actions of Congressman Ron Paul. Out of the woodwork they came; people whom, without reason or rational thought, defend the career of one Dr. Ron Paul without prejudice or fact. And though I make every attempt to not attack Ron Paul in a personal way, only referring to his political motives and actions, and though I list him as someone I want on my own dream-team cabinet if I were elected President of this gigantic corporate structure called the United States… those people who refuse to see anything but the mature, angelic doctor guided by the hand of Jesus himself as presented in the propaganda images that have inundated the Ron Paul campaign have certainly attacked me.
I was and still am being taken by surprise by these ad hominem attacks on my personal character, the Strawman arguments regarding this virtually mythical man, the appeals to novelty, pity, and popularity regarding his campaign and the so-called “blackout” of it in the media, and the constant divergent red herrings that always lead to an emotionally fueled debate down a road other than the acknowledgment of the facts at hand. These fallacies have taken hold of otherwise logical folks and cleared the logic centers of their brains.
Of course, at no time has there been this kind of response from anyone who isn’t a Ron Paul supporter, which again leads me to the only reasonable comparison: Obama supporters – who are equally unable to ingest facts about their chosen candidate due to the prophet-like pedestal that Obama has been set upon by themselves.
Further research has now lead me to take upon myself more of this burden of personal attack by taking a closer examination of the Ron Paul “HR 459, The Audit the Fed Bill to the 112th Congress“, as described on Paul’s website.
Interesting to note here is that according to Ron Paul’s congressional (.gov) website, this bill’s predecessor:
“HR 1207garnered broad bi-partisan support with 320 cosponsors in the 111th Congress, and was attached (but removed in conference) as an amendment to the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Bill“.
This is especially confounding to me as this would have meant that this “Audit the Fed” bill had enough votes through its co-sponsors (320) to pass in congress as its own free-standing bill, among the 435 congress-people that would have voted on this bill. A simple majority of 218 votes would have passed this bill. And so the question of why this perfectly stable bill was attached to another bill instead as an amendment to that bill, where it could then be swatted away like a pesky fly, comes into question.
What did Congressman Paul have to say about this on the same (.gov) website?
“I was very pleased that so many of my colleagues were willing to stand up for transparency and accountability in government by cosponsoring HR 1207 in the last Congress. I am optimistic about our prospects for a full and complete audit in the 112th Congress,” stated Congressman Paul.
In short, this was a colossal fail on the part of Ron Paul, allowing this bill to be arbitrarily removed from the law-books by allowing it to be transformed into an amendment instead of a bill! Whether or not this was a purposeful and preconceived failure is a question that I am not qualified to answer. But I will state that I believe this to be highly suspicious behavior for a bill that would otherwise be a sure thing.
It is also interesting to note that Ron Paul has sponsored another bill for this years session, H.R. 1496: Federal Reserve Transparency Act, 112th Congress: 2011-2012. Though this bill is identical to H.R. 459 except for the last paragraph, this bill has no co-sponsors whatsoever. What is most important to understand though is this statement, which is the description of the bill and what it strives to accomplish:
“To amend title 31, United States Code, to reform the manner in which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is audited by the Comptroller General of the United States and the manner in which such audits are reported, and for other purposes.”
Sometimes we miss the most important things when we read them. Here it states “…the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is audited…“. This tells us that the Board is already, in fact, audited. It also states that the goal of this bill is “…to reform the manner in which…” that already existing audit is reported to Congress.
In fact, the Federal Reserve Act, which is of course codified into U.S. (Federal) CODE, (12USC 225b) states clearly that this audit already exists:
Section 2B. Appearances Before and Reports to the Congress
(b) Congressional report. The Board shall, concurrent with each semi-annual hearing required by this section, submit a written report to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Banking and Financial Services of the House of Representatives, containing a discussion of the conduct of monetary policy and economic developments and prospects for the future, taking into account past and prospective developments in employment, unemployment, production,investment, real income, productivity, exchange rates, international trade and payments, and prices.
[12 USC 225b. As added by act of Dec. 27, 2000 (114 Stat. 3028).]
(c)Public access to information. The Board shall place on its home Internet website, a link entitled `Audit‘, which shall link to a web page that shall serve as a repository of information made available to the public for a reasonable period of time, not less than 6 months following the date of release of the relevant information, including–
the reports prepared by the Comptroller General under section 714 of title 31, United States Code;(Note: This is the only thing that is amended by the “Audit The Fed” bill.)
the annual financial statements prepared by an independent auditor for the Board in accordance with section 11B; (Note: This is, in fact, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), the actual audit of the Federal Reserve.)
the reports to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate required under section 13(3) (relating to emergency lending authority); and
such other information as the Board reasonably believes is necessary or helpful to the public in understanding the accounting, financial reporting, and internal controls of the Board and the Federal reserve banks.
[12 USC 225b. As added by act of July 21, 2010 (124 Stat. 2118).]
And so we can see that the CAFR, which is the over 500 page audit of the Federal Reserve, is readily available to the public for its consumption. So it is, in this author’s opinion, safe to assume that the men and women of Congress, including Dr. Ron Paul, absolutely have access to this audit.
The real question that must be asked here is whether or not the Congress is actually allowed to take the audited financial information reported in the CAFR reports into consideration regarding its day to day legislation and budget, since it is not specifically mandated to be given as evidence to the Congress itself.
Just as every local, county, and state government prepares its financial measures and budgetary requirements for the people and their governance through the carefully selected portion of their Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports, which they call the “budget report”, is this also how Congress operates? Does Congress also receive a hand selected budget report for which it must operate under, not being allowed to take into consideration what is reported in the Comprehensive Audit of government as printed in the CAFR (fund investments, real estate investments, foreign currency and precious metals holdings, securities, and so much more)?
This would finally make the whole shell-game make sense!
If the Congress is not allowed to take the CAFR (audit) into consideration, and indeed only legislates through a limited and hand selected budget report that excludes the majority of liquid assets held by the Federal Government and funneled out of the taxpayer base into 1000’s of various investment funds and portfolios, then we can finally understand why our Congress can never create a balanced budget! And perhaps we can then begin to understand why Congressman Ron Paul does not talk about the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for government and its Federal Reserve Bank in any public forums, including within the halls of Congress.
A closer look at H.B. 459 reveals a startling conclusion… This bill does not create an audit of the Federal Reserve. That audit already exists, according to the writing of H.B. 459 itself, as well as its senate counterpart, S.202, sponsored by who else but Ron Paul’s son, Rand Paul, who was recently elected to the Senate.
In fact, the bill only refers to the Comptroller General under U.S.CODE, deleting only a few restrictions for what the comptroller general may audit from the Federal Reserve. This in no way creates a new audit or changes the current audit, or the CAFR.
Amazingly, while these cuts are not bad things by any means, the paragraph in H.B. 459 states the following:
Interestingly, it seems that subsection (f) has already been stricken, making paragraph (d) of these “Audit the Fed” bills redundant. However, in Ron Paul’s new bill H.B. 1496 – the one with no co-sponsors – this problem is addressed (see link above).
When we go to the U.S.CODE and read Section 714 of TITLE 31, we find the following:
(b) Under regulations of the Comptroller General, the Comptroller General shall audit an agency, but may carry out an onsite examination of an open insured bank or bank holding company only if the appropriate agency has consented in writing. Audits of the Board and Federal reserve banks may not include—
(1) transactions for or with a foreign central bank, government of a foreign country, or nonprivate international financing organization;
(2) deliberations, decisions, or actions on monetary policy matters, including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, and open market operations;
(3) transactions made under the direction of the Federal Open Market Committee; or
(4) a part of a discussion or communication among or between members of the Board and officers and employees of the Federal Reserve System related to clauses (1)–(3) of this subsection.
So this entire subsection will be amended to read as the following:
(b) Under regulations of the Comptroller General, the Comptroller General shall audit an agency, but may carry out an onsite examination of an open insured bank or bank holding company only if the appropriate agency has consented in writing.
Now, so that we are clear here… if the Federal Reserve Bank is allowed to retain the power of consent regarding which banks or bank holding companies that the Comptroller General is able to audit, then this whole paragraph is completely worthless. And the 4 subsections that are being cut out of this portion of this “Audit” bill might as well stay in the bill, for the Federal Reserve retains the power after amendment to simply say no!
Only if H.B. 459, s.202, and H.B. 1496, which are almost identical bills and are identical regarding this amendment… only if these bills were to have cut out the statement “only if the appropriate agency has consented in writing” would they actually accomplish any significant change in the accounting and auditing structure afforded in this CODE. In other words, this is a complete fail once again for Ron Paul, and now for his son. Once again, I cannot say for certain whether or not this colossal mistake was purposeful or not, but I must state with perfect clarity that I am starting to believethat there is a devious and purposeful betrayal here, using the lack of careful examination of the very supporters of this bill and the bill’s blatantly misleading semantics to fool Ron Paul’s fans into thinking this bill will do anything at all to change the auditing that already exists within the Comptroller General’s office.
In effect, these bills do absolutely nothing. And I find that highly suspicious and deeply concerning.
If, after reading this article and checking the provided sources and the U.S.CODE itself, you do not come to the same conclusion that I have here today, then I must admit that I am deeply concerned for my America and in the ability for its people to think for themselves.
And so, once again, I sight this research as just one of the reasons that I am running for President of the United States.
Let the insults and fallacies begin!
Please comment below…
.
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, November 16, 2011
A gentleman named Richard was kind enough to write and tell me his experiences about trying to bring exposure to the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). After repeatedly attempting to get the media and all major political campaigns to bring this information to the light of the people, his efforts were of course stepped upon.
Only if enough of the people (that’s you) demand that the Ron Paul Campaign For Liberty and other presidential campaigns start speaking of and divulging the government CAFR, including the Federal Reserve CAFR (the “audit” of the Fed) – this cooperative and complete cover-up will continue for all time.
As another reader commented… “If you are going to attend any Ron Paul speaking engagements, I suggest you should print off a copy of the latest Federal Reserve Annual Financial Report and bring it with you. Every time Ron Paul mentiones the Federal Reserve, you hold the report up over your head at arms length for 5 seconds to show him you know the Fed is already being audited. I’m pretty sure after the first speech of this happening, he will come to realize that people elsewhere are learning the truth as well. It will also show you how many others in the audience know the truth. If you get to shake his hand, another thing to do would be to ask him for his autograph. If he agrees, ask him to autograph the cover of the Annual Financial Report.” –John
I am posting Richard’s letter here:
Clint,
I just wanted to share with you my experience trying to get the word out regarding the CAFR scam. After I had been introduced to the idea by Walter Burien, I saw your excellent movie (the corporation nation, part 1), and that explained it very well. I am still studying the whole thing, and connecting it to many other parts of the puzzle I have been working on since about 1965.
But I understood enough to see what an effect it could have on society if this money were exposed, such as no more excuse for taxes, and no more municipalities using the excuse of being broke to cut services and raise fees, etc. So I started taking the time to call media outlets all over the country. This included TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, etc. It was a very interesting experience. In almost every case, the lower level employees that had no authority over anything were interested to learn more. But as soon as it got to any minor managerial level, the investigation of what I presented was stopped immediately and communication was cut off.
My theory is that so many aspects of this go even deeper than we imagine, and all these media channels have already been threatened that they will cease to exist or worse, if they mention certain things, and CAFR is one of those. I think they all value their salaries, and will not even think of risking everything just to be honorable and inform the public. They are more like actors, just writing and speaking about what they are told is acceptable.
Then I started calling political offices all over the country, perhaps 100 of them or so, to see what their attitude would be. It was pretty much the same. Some seemed interested at first, but soon cut off communication. It was pretty obvious that virtually all of them, regardless of party or political point of view, had been threatened or somehow scared into staying within certain limits.
As a last effort I called Ron Paul’s office, not once but perhaps 10 or 15 times. Many of the politicians are doing the excuse that if you are outside their district they will not even talk to you, yet they vote on bills that effect everyone. Complete hypocrisy in that policy. However, Ron’s office did not do that, and was very polite and the people there actually talked to me. That’s why I called them multiple times.
Many staffers were interested and may have watched the movie. However I was not able to get Ron himself to do anything with it publicly. I think he is a good man and honorable, and not under the direction of our rulers, but I also believe that getting assassinated is not his goal, and he may realize that could easily be the result of trying to bring up this topic. I have great appreciation for Ron for working on things like abolishing the fake “federal reserve,” the IRS, the income tax, withdrawing from criminal organizations like the UN, many unconstitutional treaties that are very bad for us, pushing strongly for health freedom which is in great danger right now, and just generally wanting to take government all the way back to its legitimate limits, eliminating much of what it does now, and he is the only major candidate even talking about these things. He has a very consistent and strong voting record for individual freedom, which I totally support. But I believe he knows about CAFR and knows also that his career would be over as well as his ability to continue his work, if he mentions CAFR.
I am still looking at other ways to expose CAFR so widely and quickly that it could not be stopped, something practical that could really accomplish this in our real life situation we are facing now. I am sure others are trying to figure that one out as well. I am at least bringing it to the attention of others within my circles and it has been the first exposure for everyone I have mentioned it to. Thanks for helping me understand how it works, and especially for the detailed reports on specific states and cities, the examples are very helpful. –Richard
.
–Clint Richardson(realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Sunday, November 6th, 2011
A friend and listener to our local AM station took our interview with the mayor of Salt Lake County, where he admits to the county CAFR and over $650 million in extra fund balances. He also included the CAFR pages I read from as reference.
Though I already posted the interview (audio only), I feel like this is the most important public official confession as to the wealth of the government as shown in government’s financial statements.
Please pass this on…
–
Also, learn more about government Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR’s) with CAFR School, here:
This post, which is now over 6 years old, signifies my first flirtation with the STRAWMAN concept of personhood. I invite you instead to read a free copy (.pdf) of my new book, released June 17th, 2016, by going to this link –> StrawmanStory.info
I leave this post up for posterity, a glimpse into my own former ignorance, and wish readers to know that my knowledge has increased two-fold since this was written, and I do not, I repeat, do not in any way support the SPC or other commercial routes. Please read my book, for what is missing in this post.
Its title is: “STRAWMAN: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person.”
When printed, the cover will look something like this:
≈
— This is an audio blog. Press play for my reading of this article —
≈
I’d like to tell you about a man named Joe…
I met Joe serendipitously via a forwarded email not too long ago, and contacted him shortly thereafter. It seemed as though Joe was having a few problems and complications while trying to be a free and sovereign man, as well as a “Secured Party Creditor“.
I met up with Joe for coffee just a few days later and found that we had much of the same information and shared many of the same values, including an urgent desire to be truly free human beings on this earth and within this once great country. Joe lives here in Salt Lake County, Utah part-time, part-time in Mobile, Alabama, and in China the rest of the time. Being fortunate enough to have traveled the world myself for a number of years, I have a good idea of what unique and wonderful cultures the Asian continent holds. And so as Joe argued that he likes to live in China most of the time simply because that so-called “Communist” country is 100 times more free than America, I wholeheartedly and sincerely had a difficult time disagreeing with him.
Now, this might seem to be the most ridiculous notion in the world to you, you who possibly have never traveled anywhere outside of these United prison States, and so have only the media as a reference to the illogical fallacies of America’s superior government and freedoms. But then, how could you possibly know that only about 200 of the well over 1 billion people we call collectively the Chinese are actually communists?
The wealthy government? Communist.
The people? Just regular people like you and me.
Do you think that because the Democratic Party (a private corporation) is in control of the United States government today and for the next couple of years, that all citizens of the United States are Democrats?
No. That would be a ridiculous and illogical fallacy based on no fact or scientific observation at all.
So then, do you think that because the Communist Party is in control of China’s government, that all Chinese people are Communists as well?
No. That would be a ridiculous and illogical fallacy based on no fact or scientific observation at all.
And come to think of it, how could you know that your U.S. constitution was suspended by the Act of April 9, 1933 by congressional approval and the declaration of emergency powers, and that all authority was handed over to the President of the United States, then one Franklin Delano Roosevelt? And how could you know that we are still living under that same declared state of emergency today? How indeed… The public school system certainly doesn’t teach us that now does it…
“Supposedly, governments were invented to make human life easier and safer. But governments always end up enslaving humanity. That which we create to “serve” us ends up ruling us. The U.S. government by and for the people… now imprisons millions, takes half the national income by force, over-regulates, punishes, tortures, slaughters foreigners, invades countries, overthrows governments, imposes 700 imperialistic bases overseas, inflates the currency, and crashes future generations with massive debts. That which we create to serve us ends up ruling us. The problem with the “state as servant” thesis is that it is historically, completely false, both empirically and logically. The idea that states were voluntarily invented by citizens to enhance their own security is utterly untrue… The earliest governments and empires were in fact a ruling class of slave-hunters, who understood that because human beings could produce more than they consumed, they were worth hunting, capturing, breaking in, and owning… When cows are placed in very confining stalls, they beat their heads against the walls resulting in injuries and infections. Thus farmers now give them more room; not because they want to set their cows free, but rather because they want greater productivity and lower costs. The next stop after free-range is not freedom. The rise of state capitalism in the 19th century was actually the rise of free-range serfdom. Additional “liberties” were granted to the (human) livestock not with the goal of setting them free, but rather with the goal of increasing their productivity… When you look at a map of the world, you are not looking at countries, but farms. You are allowed certain liberties: limited property ownership, movement rights, freedom of association and occupation; not because your government approves of these rights in principle – since it constantly violates them – but rather because free-range livestock is so much cheaper to own, and so much more productive… State capitalism, socialism, communism, fascism, democracy… these are all livestock management approaches. Some work well for long periods… and some work very badly. They all fail eventually because it is immoral and irrational to treat human beings as livestock… Rulers have recognized that if they prevent you from fleeing the farm, you will become depressed, inert, and unproductive. A serf is the most productive when he imagines he is free. Thus your rulers must provide you the illusion of freedom in order to harvest you most effectively. Thus you are allowed to leave, but never to real freedom, only to another farm. Because the whole world is a farm. They will prevent you from taking a lot of money, they will bury you in endless paperwork, they will restrict your right to work… but you are “free” to leave. Due to these difficulties very few people do leave, but the illusion of mobility is maintained. If only 1 out of 1000 cows’ escape, but the illusion of escaping significantly raises the productivity for the remaining 999, it remains a net gain for the farmer. You are also kept on the farm through licensing. The most productive livestock are the (so-called educated) “professionals”. So the rulers fit them with an electronic dog collar called a license, which only allows them to practice their trade on their own farm. To further create the illusion of freedom, in certain farms the livestock are allowed to choose between a few farmers (politicians) that the investors present. At best they are given minor choices (votes) in how they are managed. (But) they are never given the choice to shut down the farm and be truly free. Government schools are indoctrination pens for livestock. They train children to “love the farm” and to fear true freedom and independence, and to attack anyone who questions the brutal reality of human ownership. Furthermore they create jobs for the intellectuals that state propaganda so relies on. The idea that democracy and some sort of social contract justifies the brutal exercise of violent power over billions is patently ridiculous. If you say to a slave that his ancestors “chose” slavery and therefore he is bound by their decisions, he will simply say ‘If slavery is a choice, then I choose not to be a slave.‘ This is the most frightening statement for the ruling classes, which is why they train their slaves to attack anyone who dares speak it. Statism is an ideology, and all ideologies are variations on human livestock management practices. Nationalism is pimped-out bigotry, designed to provoke a “Stockholm Syndrome” in the livestock… You do not have to be livestock. Take the red pill. Wake up…” —Stefan Molyneux
≈
Anyway, as we sipped our coffee, Joe and I began a long discussion about many things, and he thankfully filled in many pieces of the puzzle that I had been missing about the “Secure Party Creditor” issue and the many facets of being a creditor instead of a debtor.
And so, with the disclaimer that this is not legal or lawful advise (just covering my A$$) I am now going to share what I have learned. I recommend to everyone reading this to do your own research and verify everything I say here today. I would also highly recommend that you take my advice offered below, and go to your local “Justice Center” and sit in court as an observer. You will be amazed at what you see once you comprehend the following information…
≈
What Is My STRAWMAN?
≈
≈
Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines the term “strawman” as:
1: a weak or imaginary opposition set up only to be easily confuted.
2: a person set up to serve as a cover for a usually questionable transaction.
≈
The Strawman can be summed up as an imaginary, passive stand-in for the real participant; a front; a blind; a person regarded as a nonentity. The Strawman is a “shadow,” a go-between.
≈
So let’s start off with a bit of background…
First, understand that the government is a collection of private corporations. Chances are you live in an incorporated municipality, nicknamed the “City” or the “Town” or the “Borough“, located within the “County”, which in turn is located within the “State”. This is the corporation acting as the “Government” of that “City“. For instance, I live in the Draper City Corporation, and around me are the Provo City Corporation and the Salt Lake City Corporation. These are the actual names of the “city” governments, called “incorporated municipalities”.
See a complete evidential examination of this corporate structure and its Comprehensive Annual Financial Reporting (CAFR) system in my documentary “The Corporation Nation” here: http://thecorporationnation.com/
The corporate municipality then creates De-Facto statutory code, for which they nickname “The Law“… though most of these codes are not actually congressionally approved law (approved by our so-called representative congressmen), but are instead what is called Prima Facie (presumed) law (legality), for which all citizens are required by the corporation they contract with to follow with their due consent. But legal corporate CODE is only statutory law if it receives the acquiescence (consent) of the governed. We, the People are the governed. Without our consent, the Prima Facie presumption of law (CODE) has no legal standing. It has no authority backing it up accept our agreement that it is law, since the consensual agreement by the governed makes the contractual aspect of the legality null and void if it is not consented to. While a legality/CODE may not always be lawful, law always trumps legality if consent is not given to the legality (presumed law).
Common Law, or Case Law, should be studied and understood. It is up to you to know this case-law, or at least the ones that apply to your specific case, so that it can be considered as common law. Why? Because U.S. CODE is 157 feet long in dozens of volumes, so no human being could possibly know the law (CODE)! So if you want common law to be considered in a court of law, you will have to research and present that case-law to the court yourself. The so-called judge (an attorney in a black moo-moo) has no legal requirement to introduce case-law (common law) into his own court regardless of whether or not it would prove your innocence, nor does the prosecuting attorney, and believe it or not, neither does your defending attorney (an agent of the court, not you)! This is why defending yourself with the knowledge of jurisdiction and common law is paramount. In other words, if you want the court and/or the jury (always request/demand a jury trial, lest the privately incorporated judge seal your fate) to consider actual law, you must be the one to introduce and ensure that this law is read in the court and duly registered as evidence of common (case) law.
The “municipality” then hires police officers to enforce all of these legal codes. These are called code-enforcement officers – a police man veiled in municipal corporate authority becomes a police officer – an officer of the municipal corporation. These “officers” work for the municipal corporation (city or town) you live in; a private corporate police force, enforcing the codes created by this private corporation, but not necessarily the common law. They have no requirement to protect and serve you or your neighbor’s constitutional rights (since you really have none in a corporate structure under a declared “state of emergency”), but they are required only to protect the continuity and CODE of the municipal corporation they serve. They are only there to help you to obey CITY, COUNTY, STATE, and U.S. CODE by fining and arresting you if you do not obey that CODE. These codes that I am referring to are all corporate codes, as all of these cities, counties, states, and the United States (Federal municipality, Washington D.C.) are also incorporated entities.
Though you may live in what is referred to as an unincorporated area, you are still within a county or state corporation, and part of THE UNITED STATES INCORPORATED, the corporate veil of artificial person-hood that is laying on top of and killing slowly the united states of America.
In an unincorporated area (a city or town that is not a municipal corporation) your law enforcement agency is the County Sheriff. This is why the County Sheriff is of such vital importance to any of the freedoms we still do enjoy, the only truly lawful representative (elected and approved by the people) of common law. Many elected sheriffs across the country though have sold out their people by assigning away that lawful right in lieu of Federal grants and United Nations treaties. Salt Lake County’s Sheriff Jim Winder is no exception. After being elected to a second term in office, he and the poisonous County Council dissolved the Sheriff’s department and created a private corporation called the “Unified Police District”, of which the elected Sheriff became the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of that now private incorporated police force. Counties across America are falling prey to this act of treason, loosing the last vestige of protection of their common law rights, and Salt Lake County is now literally a “police state”.
≈
Into The World We Are Berthed
≈
But for some real perspective, let’s go back even further, to the day you were born.
The collective corporation wastes no time in grabbing up its slaves and forcing them into indentured servitude as citizens. The seemingly harmless act of filling out a certificate of live birth ensures that you, a living breathing human being with a soul, are ushered into this corporate structure without any chance to challenge this action. Your parents have just signed their new born baby, birthed into the United States under Maritime Law and Universal Commercial Code (The Law Of The Sea) like a ship docking into the port of New York, over to the Federal Government by way of a Certificate of Live Birth. This contract places its listed contents (you) as property of the United States Government. You are born into servitude, and you are immediately considered to be collateral for the good faith and credit of the United States Government, U.S. INC. You are now part of the herd, a herd of human chattel, enslaved from inception. And you have just been veiled in an artificial person-hood; you have been incorporated and given a STRAWMAN corporate name similar to your human name.
Unfortunately, all you can do in response at that tender age is to burp and maybe wet yourself after a good cry!
Now, it is important to comprehend that all of this happened at an age before you, as a living free human being with a soul, had any way to read, comprehend (under-stand), acquiesce (consent), or sign (agree to in writing) this contractual incorporation of your legal person.
Consent cannot be lawfully given for any contract without full disclosure and acquiescence of said contract. This is basic, standard contract law. The state contracts with you anyway by way of its legal Prima Facie prerogative to do so, at the tender age of Zero. And so your parents signed ownership of you as a commodity over to the government without even realizing the fate they had just sealed for you as their parents had unwittingly done to them. They just signed away, without comprehension or acquiescence, their most prized possession to the state. And this is why the so-called government agency called “Child Protective Services” has the legal jurisdiction of acquiring your children at any time it sees fit. Your parents gave them that right at your birth, as you likely did or will do with your own children at their birth.
Of course, you can never retrieve your original Birth Certificate from the Federal Government. You can only request to acquire a certified copy of that document. The original is kept in the corporation called Washington D.C. (a private corporate “district” outside of the 50 states united) and used as collateral. You are that collateral, as the “attorney-in-fact” (representative) of that STRAWMAN trust, which is created under your “STRAWMAN” corporate name. This trust is accessed in times of corporate commerce, like when a loan, credit card, or contract is written in our STRAWMAN name.
My free name is Clint P Richardson.
My STRAWMAN name is CLINT P RICHARDSON.
All legal contracts will be in the all capital letter name, representing my corporate person, not me as a living breathing human being. Take a look at your driver’s license and any contracts you have and notice this all capital letter you.
I can talk about “Target” as the name of the physical building that houses the store that I am going to visit, but it’s true corporate name is TARGET CORPORATION.
More on this later…
≈
Ownership?
≈
Just like the Birth Certificate, anytime you “register” anything with the state, you are assigning ownership of that thing over to the state. This is why the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), through the private municipal code-enforcement police force, can take your vehicle at any time they see fit. Your consent was given for this as soon as you signed the authorized signature line of your registration forms. But even before that, you learned these codes set up by the state, and you acquired a license to drive, signing away your God-given common law right to travel in lieu of permission from the state to drive on the authorized signature line. That license gave your consent to the state, county, and municipal corporations to enforce those traffic codes upon you, as you are the carrier of your artificial person (STRAWMAN) – your corporate “person” – that you carry with you like a veil of invisible clothing. The word incorporate indeed stems from the Latin word corpus, meaning to veil something in artificial person-hood. This is what a corporation is: an artificial person, with 1st amendment rights of free speech due to precedent set by private corporate courts (the laughably titled Justice System) over the years.
So that I am making myself clear, the “Authorized Signature” line is on most contracts and even on your own personal or business checkbook. When they say, “sign on the dotted line”, they are referring to this “dotted” authorized signature line. But if we look closer, this is not a line at all. If you take a magnifying glass out and look at the line where you place your signature on your personal checks, you will discover a frightening surprise… That dotted line actually says:
By signing that line as a free and natural human being with a soul, you are authorizing your STRAWMAN corporate “person” to engage in commerce within the corporation, using Federal Reserve Notes out of your checking account.
What do Federal Reserve Notes have to do with this transaction?
Remember, when you were born, and then more importantly when you received a Social Security Number (SSN), you became collateral for the good faith and credit of the United States Government; for the corporation acting as the De Facto government.
De Facto means “in practice but not necessarily ordained by law” -or– “in practice or actuality, but without being officially established.” – For example: the people obey a contract as though there were a law enforcing it, yet there is no such law (only presumed law by consent of the two parties in the contract). This is our government… a corporation not allowed or not being operated under the jurisdiction of law, but only by its own legal CODE, of which requires the consent of the governed (the contracted citizens). These CODES are like the codes at your job: if you don’t like the rules, you quit.
De Jure means “what the law says” -or- “concerning the law”. It is the common, natural law and it is the basis of a constitutional republic. The original constitution for the united states of America was indeed a De Jure common law consensu al contract. But as we discussed earlier, that piece of paper was suspended and a fictional corporate constitution was enacted in its place by a dictatorial De Facto Executive government.
If you look at the back of your Social Security card (a unit of the International Monetary Fund – IMF) you will find a set of digits. These digits are different from the ones that make up your SS#. This one starts with a letter and is followed by 8 numbers instead of 9.
Now look at any $1 dollar bill…
Notice that the serial number that is on the front lower left side of that Federal Reserve Note has one letter and 8 numbers, followed by another letter. Drop the last letter, and you have a dollar bill whose serial number matches a Social Security (CUSIP) number for some STRAWMAN in the United States.
Your STRAWMAN trust is used as this collateral. This serial number represents the corporate trust account of your STRAWMAN that was set up when you were birthed into artificial person-hood, as accessed by your Social Security Number.
Since all contracts you sign on the authorized (STRAWMAN) signature line represent Federal Reserve Notes, and since all commerce you enter into is also using this debt money system, your are contracted with the state and its taxes by consent when using these “U.S. Dollars”.
When you go to a bank and sign a loan application, that application and the promissory note that you sign gets turned into money via the fractional reserve system. This is how new money is created. It is not money, in reality, but rather what is called “evidence of debt”. This simply means that each Federal Reserve Note, digital or paper, is the debt of the country. It must be paid back to the FED as this money was created or borrowed by the people (chattel). So instead of money, we carry around debt papers; I.O.U’s if you will, all representing one STRAWMAN or another…
Thus, since the (property) home or automobile you have purchased is with that newly created money out of your STRAWMAN trust account through the fractional reserve banking system, it is the property of the state!
It is important to understand here what the government has defined as “property”, and why it grants itself the authority to seize the property of any citizen who contracts with it:
“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of government, i.e. law, amounting to mere user; and user must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.”—Senate Document No. 43,73D Congress, 1st Session, entitled: “Contracts Payable in Gold”, by George Cyrus Thorpe, submitted to the senate: April 17, 1933
This is a very revealing senatorial document. It sheds light on the concept of government and its requirement of permission and licenses. It also explains why all property must be registered with the state.
Who owns all property? Who owns the home and the land it sits on that you call your own? Who has the authority or permission to mortgage property?
“The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.”–Congressman Patman, speaking from the Congressional Record of March 9, 1933, and referring to the Act of March 9, 1933.
≈
Do You Need A License Or Permit To Drive, Hunt, And Fish?
≈
According to the state, which holds your “STRAWMAN” in contract, you do, as you are the legal representative of that fictional “STRAWMAN” signing on the authorized signature line of all contracts.
Your contract (license and registration) with DMV is the very reason why you must obey the codes set up by the DMV.
And your hunting and fishing license is a contract in which you give up your natural and common law right to hunt and fish and instead accept not only the permission (permit), but all the legalities, limits, and seasons imposed by the state though that contract.
But what about my new friend Joe? Remember Joe?
Since Joe is a free man not driving but living and traveling on the land without intentionally being contracted with the private corporation we know as the De Facto government, he does not need a permit or license to do what free men like himself have the right to do.
This is the difference between a God-given right and a state-granted privilege.
Rights are foolishly and contractually given up for this state permission.
Traveling is a lawful term. Driving is a legal term.
Traveling is a right. Driving is a privilege.
But of course, the corporate De Facto police still harass and write citations for Joe, despite the fact that he has no license plate number or driver’s license number to reference on the ticket or citation, nor a permit number to reference for anything he does, like hunting and fishing. And so this is a real conundrum. For Joe is one of many thousands of brave individuals acting as free men (and women) across this once free country. And sadly, Joe has no support from the rest of the indentured slaves, who have come to value their particular brand of servitude under contract to the state. People – corporate persons – actually self-police their code-enforced society and turn in people like Joe to the code-enforcement officers as if he is breaking the law! This is only due to the fact that most corporate persons (citizens of UNITED STATES INC.) do not know what law is, because corporate government legality and CODES have been laid over the law; a thinly veiled yet heavily enforced set of rules that go against everything a free and constitutional society in a republic form of government should stand for.
They have been spun by the mainstream media, and even by much of the alternative media, that democracy is freedom. The word republic has long disappeared from public media discourse. Of course, since a republic ensures that all people are represented in government and in common law as free men, no matter how small the minority is – even a minority of one – a democracy ensures that a certain percent of the population up to 49.99% must submit to the will of the “vote” of the other 50.01%. So in a democracy, 1 – 50% of the people can have their rights taken away by the other half.
And this is called freedom?
Of course, these people who are on the legal majority side are the people who turn in other people for not obeying the legal CODES that they blindly follow, mistaking these legalities as laws. They vote what their media tells them. The minority, in this case Joe, is harassed, cursed, condemned, and cast out as insane. Thus, the democratic process is complete.
The republic for which Joe still stands will always be there though, despite the veil of corporate governance that has usurped the beauty of that free republic. And Joe will never give his consent to this democracy… the duped voting and consenting public who are strangled and blinded by their STRAWMAN.
≈
Joe Goes To Court!
≈
Now that we have a grasp on what the “STRAWMAN” is and that as contracted corporate persons we are conducting all business within this De Facto presumed law government, let’s talk about what a court is.
In California and some other states, through the freedom of information act, this is a proven reality. In fact, the judge is the owner of that court, rents that court out in an official capacity to the city, county, or state for a multi-million dollar lease, and even write checks on dummy accounts that are not registered with the IRS.
The private corporate court earns a percentage of the amount of money it collects in fines, and also receives kickbacks by placing citizens in prison or on probation. All prisoners are assigned a CUSIP number based on that prisoner’s STRAWMAN trust. This CUSIP # is then bundled up with other CUSIP numbers and sold as bundled securities on the securities markets. These are bundled persons. Prisoners are commodities for which the fruit of their labor is traded. This is why jails are overflowing, and why so many people get unsupervised probation for so many months. Probationary status is still a form of incarceration, and community service is often assigned. People on probation receive the CUSIP number as well, and are bundled just like the in-house prisoners.
Obviously, this is a racket! But as slaves of the corporation, used as chattel and collateral, we are subject to this tyranny by consent.
By simple definition, what is a Secured Party Creditor (SPC)?
Joe placed all of his valuables, including his home, land, automobiles, and other property of value (only property without liens) into SPC status. This simply means that Joe, at the signing of this UCC1 form, rescinded his contracts with the state and became the true owner of his own property. He went from being a debtor to the state (where the state owns his property and allows him to use his home and vehicle with permission and license after being registered to the state), to being a creditor for himself (where Joe legally and lawfully owns his property himself without the requirement to register it with the state or to get permission or license from the state to use and operate his own property).
So now, by owning the property listed in his Secured Party Creditor document, no contract is needed with the state in the form of a license to drive (Joe is traveling freely by law, not driving).
Joe has no driver’s license, no license plates, no registration, and no insurance.
Most of the enslaved debtor chattel would hear this and gasp, thinking that Joe is “getting away with something” here. That’s only because the enslaved masses have never truly met anyone that is actually responsible for his own actions, a truly free man on the land. Joe is not getting away with anything. Joe is taking the law into his own hands and squashing corporate legality under his big toe!
And since Joe has no driver’s license number, nor a license plate number, the police have a very tough time writing Joe an infraction (ticket). Since he is not operating within the vehicle code and is not able to be tracked by the DMV and legal system, cops get really confused. You see, cops do not know much about law. They only know CODE. And so when Joe comes traveling through their municipality with his homemade plates that say “Private Property, Not For Hire”, they have no reference point to justify a ticket. They get really confused and even angry without really knowing why. How can they write a ticket for breaking a legal code if a man is not bound or contracted to follow those codes? In escence, Joe is challenging their authority, and they don’t like that.
I accompanied Joe on one of his court dates in front of one of the most corrupt “Justice Courts” in the County of Salt Lake. This was the West Valley Justice Center, presided over by one Judge Keith Stoney, accused wife-beater. This guy looked and acted like an evil Dick Cheney, which is saying a lot. And, after watching several other cases before Joe where this fake judge stole hoards of cash in the 10’s of thousands from the people attending their court dates, and after actually hearing this crook say to one of the defendants as he slammed down his gavel in a fit of unholy rage and undue authority, “You owe me $900 dollars!”, the slick public prosecutor called for Joe.
Now, before the official court session was started, the bailiff announced to the courtroom to “all rise” for the honorable Judge Stoney, to which everyone in the courtroom acquiesced. That is, except for Joe and I. We remained seated, as we did not wish for the court to construe that we consent to or acknowledge the court’s or the judge’s jurisdiction or authority. This “judge” was neither honorable nor in a position of power over us, and our insolent act of remaining seated was the first step in acknowledgment of that fact. Every effort was made to never enter into any type of contract or admission of guilt or loss of authority. Joe is the authority over the judge, not the other way around. Only a jury of Joe’s peers in a common law court accepted by Joe can have that kind of authority. This was one of the purest acts of non-consent.
Joe, who has Multiple Sclerosis and uses two canes, was sitting in the front row of seats just outside of the “Bar”. The Bar is the wall (generally a wooden fence which may have a gate) between the seats in the courtroom and the actual court. Once you cross over the Bar from the seating section and into the court, you have just entered into a foreign land. This is the jurisdiction of Universal Commercial Code and Maritime Law, as represented by the war flag with gold fringe hanging in every courtroom. Crossing the Bar is the first step to loosing your common law rights; by leaving the constitutionally defined state‘s free land and lawful jurisdiction and entering into the court’s legal UCC jurisdiction.
Joe never crossed the Bar…
He told the judge that he could conduct himself in the seat that he was sitting in, and that getting up and entering into the court was too much of a hardship for his handicap. This was his angle; it was true, and it worked.
Judge Stoney, having previously received written Statements Of Notice from Joe that he would sue the judge for his bond if he proceeded in any unlawful and non-common law way with his case, considering that Joe was not contracted with the state, did not argue with Joe. Joe gave the judge an out, and the judge decided to take that out. All of this happened without even a spoken word, and without even the slightest clue of anyone else in that courtroom, attorney’s included. Because attorney’s don’t know law either, only corporate legality and CODE.
So Joe never really entered into the courts’ or the judges’ jurisdiction, either physically or verbally!
Note: Joe was making a “special appearance“, and definitely not a “general appearance“. Please research on your own what these terms mean. They may save your liberties some day:
“When a plaintiff sues a defendant, the plaintiff chooses the court in which to bring the suit. However, that court may not be able to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant. A special appearance provides a method for a defendant to contest a court’s jurisdiction over his person and property.” (Very important!!!)
“When a defendant makes a special appearance in court, he does not appear in the court, but stipulates that his appearance is strictly for the purpose of contesting the court’s personal jurisdiction over him. The defendant will be able to engage with the court in a debate over the validity of his contacts with the state, but he may not open any other subject or the court may consider him to be making a general appearance, and therefore subject to jurisdiction.”
“Courts have ruled that a general appearance by the defendant constitutes purposeful availment and thus justifies exercise of jurisdiction. A defendant makes a general appearance when he shows up in that forum state’s court for the purposes of answering the plaintiff’s claim. Because a general appearance indicates the defendant’s willingness to have the court adjudicate the dispute (and thus the defendant’s use of the benefits and protections of the state), making a general appearance in a state court will subject the defendant to personal jurisdiction in that state.”
Note: This is where most people slip up, by accidentally entering into contract and jurisdiction with the court by agreeing with the judge about something. It could be the simple act of sitting down or taking off their hat when the judge asks them to, or answering to the STRAWMAN name without stating that you are not that corporate person, all of which can be legally construed as an acknowledgment of understanding (standing under) the judges authority and jurisdiction. Thus, the judge rules that their appearance is now a “general” one, and they are stuck in the courts jurisdiction. Be careful!!!
When asked for a plea, Joe said that he didn’t want to plea, and added for fun that he didn’t understand why he needed to.
Entering a plea is an admission of guilt… or it is an automatic ticket to a future trial with anot guilty plea. Either way, you would be in the courts jurisdiction through verbal or signed contract (plea). Some would choose to verbally state on the record that they are “innocent” in lieu of an official plea, referring to the common law constitutional coda that all men are innocent until proven guilty. But Joe simply did not enter a plea, which really makes it hard for the court to continue with its sham of justice.
Next, and this threw me for a loop until I figured out what he was doing, Joe became what I thought was a bumbling idiot… he kept saying that he didn’t understand anything that the judge was telling him. Over and over he stated this. And, after a few obviously half-assed attempts to have a normal court proceeding, the judge set a date for moderation, not trial.
Joe’s continuous response of “I don’t understand” was a well-played defense, and only two people in that courtroom knew what it meant – Joe and the judge!
By stating that he didn’t lawfully understand, Joe never entered into a verbal contract with the judge. He never accepted or acquiesced to anything that was said in that courtroom, making no verbal agreements.
You see… the word understand needs to be taken apart and examined before its true legal meaning can be comprehended.
To under-stand is really to stand under.
By stating that he understood anything that the judge said in that courtroom, Joe would have been stating that he stands under the courts authority and jurisdiction. This obviously means something totally different than it does in everyday conversational situations, and there is good reason for that…
For when a corporate code-enforcement officer arrests you and reads you your “Miranda” rights, the last statement he makes is, “Do you under stand these rights as I have read them to you?”
If you say yes, you have just verbally consented to stand under the authority of the corporation and its code for which this enforcement officer represents, and you have agreed to these so-called “rights” like, “Anything you say can and will be used against you”.
Why would you agree to that?
By saying that you don’t under stand, these rights can not be applied to you.
Some free men even go so far as to say that they “over stand” what the judge or police officer is saying, leaving no doubt for the record that their acquiescence and consent to the authority of the corporation is not forthcoming.
And so Joe never bowed to or acknowledged the authority of the court, and never stood under that authority.
When presented with paperwork to sign (an order to appear later), he signed his Secured Party Creditor name. But over the top of his signature he wrote the following statement:
“All Rights Reserved, Without Prejudice.”
This simple phrase does exactly what it says: it reserves all of your rights when you sign any agreement, traffic violation, or any other type of contract, private or public, and essentially makes the contract null and void at any time you so choose in the future. In other words, by signing “All Rights Reserved” you are retaining all of your common law rights that might otherwise be given away in that contract. And one of those rights is to not be bound by an unlawfully presented or later misrepresented contract that is unconstitutional or against your right of refusal. Adding “Without Prejudice” brings home the statement, reinforcing the fact that ALL rights are reserved, without exception.
Joe went to court the next day too, and he used the same language.
He got that case postponed for moderation, not trial as well!
Sadly, all of the other people in these courts admitted guilt 9 times out of 10. The court clerk even handed out papers that stated, “If you sign this, you are giving up your constitutional rights”. So before they even saw the judge, they had already marked the guilty or no contestbox and signed their name on the Authorized Signature Line, meaning that they acknowledge that their STRAWMAN was guilty of breaking the CODES of the municipal corporation and that they would have to pay the fines, go to jail, or endure probation at the judge’s whim on behalf of their STRAWMAN. It was a sad thing to see, with so many uneducated people signing their rights away as if it was somehow lawful, or for that matter, normal.
It should be noted here as well that all of these people who showed up that day for traffic court were by default of their ignorance of the law making a “general appearance” and sealed this fate the second they signed that form.
≈
The Manufacturers Statement of Origin
≈
Now you may be wondering why Joe was able to just walk right out of that court without contract, without making a plea, and without being arrested.
Since most of these “violations” of CODE revolved around traffic rules and regulations of the VEHICLE CODE, let’s talk about what happens when an brand new automobile is purchased.
For new “vehicles” that are manufactured at the huge conglomerate auto-makers, a special title is created that will never be seen by the consumer who purchases that vehicle through STRAWMAN contract from the dealer. When a car, truck, or SUV is delivered to each dealer this title, called the Manufacturers Statement of Origin (MSO), is delivered along with it. This MSO is very much like a birth certificate, in the fact that it is never actually in the possession of the actual STRAWMAN who believes he or she is the owner of the property. When the vehicle is sold, the dealer is required by law (legal code) to send this MSO to the state, where it is digitally cataloged and destroyed. A few weeks later, a certified copy of the Certificate Of Title, never the original copy of the MSO, is sent to the human representing the STRAWMAN, listing him or her as the operator of that vehicle. But the MSO is always held by the state, making it the true property owner. It then grants permission to drive that vehicle to the corporate person, as stated above through licensing.
Sadly, since car dealers are corporations registered with the state themselves, and bound by state regulations and legalities in order to stay in business, they are required to send this MSO to the state government. If they do not, they will simply loose their license to do business in that state.
Now you might finally understand why all of the DMV and state paperwork is insistently done at the dealership, and why you must pay the filing fees on the spot, as a “tax”. This is, after all, very well organized crime we are talking about!
To bring this point home again, you are not the owner of your property, your home or vehicle. You are a tenant. You have permission to operate the state’s vehicle and live in the state’s home and on the state’s land. And the state may take its property at any time.
Ah, but that brings us back to our friend Joe and many more like him around the country and the world…
Since Joe is a Secured Party Creditor, Joe has taken ownership away from the state and placed it into his own trust through his UCC1 filing, and then notified the government of this fact multiple times. And because Joe has rescinded his driver’s license and removed the states license plates from his lawful property, he is now a traveler – free to lawfully travel on all public roads without the burdens and tyranny of legal CODE. With no license and no other contracts, the court and the evil Cheny-esque judge simply have no authority over Joe. He is not contracted with them. He is not bound by their CODES anymore. He is free from corporate legalities. And there is no jurisdiction over a free man without his consent.
But they still pull Joe over and harass him, of course. This can really be attributed back to the slave issue we spoke of above. The code-enforcement officers are the worst kind of slaves, because they steal the freedoms of and bash the heads in of other slaves without questioning why, sometimes enjoying the false power. They are what was once called the house-negro or the house-slave. Give even a conscious slave just a little bit of authority, and he will use that authority over the rest of the slaves just as harshly as his masters. This is the story of the largest and most violent street-gang in America… the collective Municipal Police Departments.
As an example of what this gang is capable of, Joe told me a story that quite frankly really got my goat. Because he didn’t like any of the local corporate churches masquerading as 501(c)3 non-profits – branches of the for-profit incorporated main church, very much like bank branches – Joe decided to build his own church on the vacant lot beside his house, on his own property.
After building and completing this church, he named it appropriately enough, “the unincorporated church of our Lord and savior“. Notice that the name of this church was not capitalized, because this church was not incorporated! But Joe didn’t request any permits or for that matter even notify the municipality (city) of his plans to build this unincorporated church on his own property. Since his home was now in his own Secured Party Creditor-ship, these codes that required a permit were lawfully and legally not applicable.
But when the city found out about this non-taxable, non-corporately controlled house of worship, they sent out the code-enforcement team which, without Joe’s consent, entered his private property and bulldozed his church down into a pile of unrecognizable refuse. They didn’t even remove the wreckage, just leaving it there as a reminder of Joe’s enslavement.
Joe was pretty sure that one or more of his neighbors had actually tattled on him, probably worried about their property values going down, which is the most ironic part of this story. The slaves that live in government-owned homes, who falsely believe in such a thing as property values more than personal liberty and freedom (and that their homes are even their own property), were the ones who self-policed themselves and instigated the tearing down of a house of worship.
This is a real eye-opener… I mean, how well do you know and trust your neighbors. If they watch shows like “Law and Order”, which has nothing to do with law or order, you may be their future victim!
I’d say that God’s Law was broken in a big way on this day.
≈
Some Dare Call It Anarchy!
≈
Now some might say that this freedom thing is akin to anarchy...
But again, this is an illogical fallacy, brought on by way too much TV. The unreasonable and illogical thought that freedom can only equate to anarchy is proof of the government’s propaganda machine in action.
When you as an American, who are used to the customs and traffic rules and regulations of this country, then travel to Europe, do you insist on driving on the right side of the road even though everyone else there drives on the left side of the road? No. You practice the customs of that society, being a responsible human. Do you murder, rape, and pillage while on safari in Africa in a small uncharted village just because there is no law or authority that says you can’t? The government and its police and armies might, but again, no you don’t. You enjoy the cultural beauty and freedom of an untarnished people free from the legal constraints of corporate CODE. And if you lived amongst these people, you would adapt to their ways in order to live together peaceably and for the benefit of the community.
We slaves are so afraid of freedom that we think it is the end of the world. We think that without legal CODE, we cannot have law.
But in truth, there is only one basic law. That law is commonly referred to as “God’s Law”.
God’s Law simply states that you should do no harm to other people or to the property they own. It’s that simple. That covers just about everything: rape, pillage, theft, murder, violence, persecution, slavery…
Everything else is CODE. And everything else is what is unfortunately not so commonly referred to as a “victimless crime”.
A victimless crime simply means that the particular CODE that was violated had nothing to do with God’s Law. So, no individual person was injured or killed, and/or no individual’s property was harmed or stolen. That covers most of the legalities, statutes, codes, signs, and other rules and regulations that are set in place by our legislators; our slave-masters. These include running a stop sign, smoking a joint, speeding, holding a sign up in a non-free-speech zone, assembling without a permit, walking your dog without a leash, selling flowers out of your home without a business license, walking across the street (jaywalking), panhandling, not paying unjust and un-apportioned taxes, driving without a license, etc. et infinite’…
Fines and fees for these “crimes” have become what the constitution defines as “unreasonable”, and more than most slaves can afford.
Our prison system is full of people who have committed victimless crimes. And as we have discussed above, this is by design. America houses 1 out of every 100 persons in this country in prison. And many more than that are on probation (jail at home). This is profitable beyond measure. There is a very good reason after all, that Dick Cheney and Halliburton got into the profitable private-prison business!
The worst part about this type of victimless crime is that you cannot face your accuser. There is no plaintiff! No one was injured, and no property was damaged, not even the state’s. The only person harmed is the corporation called government. Making an illegal u-turn is not part of God’s Law. There is no victim!
Note: When referring to “God” we are referring to the abstract concept that we as human beings with a soul answer to a higher authority than government. This is the basis for the freedom of religion. Your belief in God, whichever one of the 1000’s of God’s out there, is not necessary for religious freedom. Freedom of religion does not mean freedom of Christianity. Remember, all minorities, even religious ones, must have representation (protection) under a republic form of government. This is one of the most important constitutional (God-given) rights there is. And unfortunately, it is one of the most corporately abused, as a collective religious, non-profit crime syndicate.
Law is always a part of any society, be it through custom or common acquiescence. But only law – not the for-profit tyrannical codification of every facet of life.
And Joe would certainly agree!
≈
Accepted For Value (A4V)
≈
One last thing… Because we have been used as collateral for the credit and printing of Federal Reserve Notes in America without a real choice, you have the right of seeking a remedy for that use of your STRAWMAN’s trust fund.
Accepted For Value (A4V) is a term that describes the offsetting of a STRAWMAN’s debt. Your corporate person-hood, your STRAWMAN, is where all of your contracts and debts are assigned. They are attached to your Social Security Number; your slave number. They are not attached to you as a living breathing human being with a soul. It is very important to distinguish between the two.
Our friend Joe has been successfully using A4V to pay such things as property taxes, loans payments, and other debts for many, many years. Others have used it for student loans, home payments, credit card payments, and many other types of loans and monetary contracts.
Here’s a simple explanation of how it works:
Step 1) You receive a bill from a corporation. (This is not to be used for purchases!) All businesses are incorporated in some form, and are conducting contractual commerce with your STRAWMAN. Otherwise, YOU would not be receiving a bill.
Step 2) You turn that bill (debit) into a check (credit) by stamping accepted for value in red, and signing in blue. (Seek experienced instruction, as this has to be done exactly right.) If you look at a bill that you have received from a corporation and then set it side by side with a paycheck that you receive from the corporation that you work at, you will see that they are set up in very much the same way. The top 2/3 of the bill is an explanation of what is being charged, and the bottom 1/3 is a debit in the form of a “payment stub”. But the paycheck is exactly the same, accept that the top part is an itemization of gross payment, taxes, and net income, and the bottom portion is a credit in the form of a check payable to you from the corporation. By following exacting instruction, you are simply changing that bill (the debit payment stub) into a check (a credit from your STRAWMAN trust account)… Accepted For Value is stamped across the bill, your SS# without dashes, your SS# with dashes, Your STRAWMAN name, your human name, and finally your signature in blue ink (not necessarily in that order).
Step 3) You send that bill, now an accepted for value check, into the IRS. The IRS is backed up with A4V claims, as many folks are now comprehending what I am telling you here.
Step 4) After this A4V is finally processed, the debit is taken from your STRAWMAN “trust account” as human collateral (chattel) and sent as a credit (a check from the IRS) to the corporation that sent you the bill in the first place.
Step 5) That corporation cashes the check (credit) to pay off your STRAWMAN’s original debt, your debt to that creditor has now been offset.
Now, understand that the IRS is actually happy to do this because it just created credit money into the economy instead of debt money. It accessed the money in your trust without having to rely on a bank to create a note. And as I understand it, it cannot access this trust account any other way.
This works for anything as far as I can tell, but it cannot be used to purchase items. This is to offset already assigned and existing debt. So going out and purchasing a $100,000 car and then trying to pay the car off in a month or two could be considered a misuse of this remedy. This is not for stupid or greedy people. This is for people who wish to save their homes from greedy banks. This is for people that are honestly seeking a remedy for the ridiculous costs of higher education. This is for people who fell for the bank and credit industry’s usurious predatory methods to trap them in high interest credit cards and collateralized loans with no other way out. This is not so that you can buy a new BMW and pay it off in a month. Those idiots who can’t comprehend justice and remedy, let alone responsibility, are doomed to become a victim of their own greed, and will joyfully be able to visit the rest of the victimless criminals in prison.
If this doesn’t make sense to you, then think of it this way…
What do you think happens when you declare bankruptcy? Only incorporated entities can declare bankruptcy. What do you think is happening when you make this declaration? You are declaring that your STRAWMAN corporation is so far in debt that you as the caretaker of that corporation cannot any longer pay that debt. So you are offsetting all of that debt attached to your corporation and starting over with a clean slate. Do you think these companies are loosing money because you declare bankruptcy? Of course not. They don’t care one way or the other. Whether they write off the debt or collect the debt, they will still make their money. And by the time they add fees, late fees, transfer fees, 3 month collection fees, interest fees, and any other type of fee they can imagine, they end up making more off of a charged-off account than they do in a successful collection.
This is the unethical UCC form of business that has engulfed our world. It is not pretty. It is not nice. In fact it is pure evil. But as long as it is in place, you may as well know what your defenses and remedies are for being forced to live in it.
For a more detailed look at A4V and STRAWMAN issues, go to the following sites:
After many encounters with different folks who are walking the walk in the Secure Party Creditor/Free Man/Sovereignty movement, I am sorry to say that this is not a figment of my imagination. I hope that somehow a support group can be started so that all of these people from across the country, who are each using only parts of the whole puzzle, can come together and create a definitive collection of legal remedies for this seemingly endless maze of a legal mess. And I hope that whoever does this isn’t just trying to make a buck. There is nothing worse in my eyes than a patriot for profit. I hope that this writing helps all who wish to understand the veil of fiction that has been pinned to us all since birth. May your journey be filled with brighter days…
Once again, please do not attempt any of this on just my writing here. This is something that should be studied and perfected before taking the plunge. This is only an attempt to put into basic comprehension what is otherwise a bailiwick of legalese and international enslavement.
And oh, if I have any of this wrong, please don’t hesitate to comment below, so that all can learn from the more astute among us. Mine is only to conceptualize the system, not to spear at the heart.
“The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship.
In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.”
— Baruch Levy. Article: Letter to Karl Marx, in magazine ‘La Revue de Paris’, p.574, June 1, 1928
≈
Our government is now completely in Zionist control. And the above quoted timeline is happening as we speak, just as was written so long ago. And obviously so, as the 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto are now law in the United States. (See them here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/04/25/the-united-states-communist-manifesto/).
So, who is Zionist in the American government?
The following is a list of the power structure of the United States government, listed by seat of succession to the presidency of the United States. Remembering that all but one of these officers were not elected but appointed, that being the president who did the appointing, it is no wonder that every single one of them are admittedly Zionist, extremely pro-Israel, that many are of Jewish Israeli descent, and that some even have duel Israeli/American citizenship.
The following videos are out of their mouths, admissions and affirmations of their support for Zionism and for Israel. There is no other country in the world for which the United States or its “politicians” gives such fervent support. We are not “friends” of any other nation. And we are not “allies” with any Arab country… Of course, with a completely Jewish and Zionist cabal in complete and total power of the United States government, why would the Arab Middle-East be an ally or a friend to the United States – except through fear, dependence and coercion – nor a completely Israeli Zionist American government to its sworn enemy of the Arab nations?
Let’s have a look at the royal family of Obama’s APPOINTED cabinet:
≈
#1 Barack Obama – It’s much easier to prove our presidents’ Zionist loyalty is not to America when a group called “Jewish Americans for Obama” comes right out and says it. Barack Obama might as well be Jewish. A true Muslim he most obviously is not… for if he were, his whole appointed staff would not be Jewish, duel-Israeli citizens, and/or Zionist! He wouldn’t be caught dead wearing a little Jewish Yamaka while visiting the Wailing Wall, and he most certainly would not support Israel and Zionism; the sworn enemy of all Arabs/Muslims!
“Those who threaten Israel, threaten us!” -Barack Obama
“Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided…” -Barack Obama
Imagine, a Muslim saying such things?
“There is a special connection between America and Israel. One that, when I traveled to Israel, was evident. Not only do we share so much in terms of common culture (usury, indecency, xenophobia, cruelty, immorality, etc…?) not only is it the sight of so much of our– of my religious faith, and the sight of so much of our understanding of the world around us… it is critical that we send a message around the world, we will stand with Israel. We want them around, not just for 60 years but for 600 years. And when I’m president of the United States they will have an unwavering ally in me.” -Barack Obama-
More of the same:
≈
#1.5 Rahm Emmanuel (Chief of Staff) – Let’s face it, the chief of staff is the boss! The late Sherman Skolnick of Chicago called Rahm Emanuel the “Acting Deputy Chief for North America of the Mossad – Israeli Intelligence (http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/S_284_S/Overthrow%20series/Rahm%20Emanuel.htm).” Skolnick went on to say that Emanuel’s father Benjamin had been “part of the Israeli assassin team that murdered Sweden’s Count [Folke] Bernadotte” in 1948. Bernadotte was the envoy of the United Nations in Palestine who sought to find a solution to the UN Partition Plan that gave Palestinian land to Jews from “beyond the pale.”
The Emanuel family name was Auerbach until 1936, although they are not related to the famous rabbinical family of Germany and Krakow named Auerbach. His father Ezekiel supposedly changed the family name to Emanuel when his son with that name died fighting Palestinians in 1936. Many Jewish families in Palestine changed their names to make themselves sound like they actually came from Palestine. And you wondered where all those Jews disappeared during World War II? Sheinerman became Sharon, Yezernitzky became Shamir, and Auerbach became Emanuel, and so on. And then multiply by a few hundred thousand. Voila! Millions of European Jews vanish from the face of the Earth – and build new lives in Palestine. -Christopher Bolyn-
Here is a news interview in which his military service in the Israeli army is admitted, and Emanuel quotes: “The best thing that can happen to Israel, is a strong America… because when America is strong, Israel is also strong.” And remember, Israel has over 200 nuclear weapons…
And why again would a Muslem (Obama) be a friend of Israel?
A completely Zionist, Israeli friendly appointed cabinet… this is why we will never have peace with the Middle East:
≈
#2 Joe Biden – Biden was the first U.S. official to give Israel’s bloody assault (on an aid flotilla) a thumbs up. The former Delaware senator has been a key part of Israel’s Hasbara branch, American section, since entering the Senate in 1973 and on Wednesday, June 1st following the Israeli attack, he appeared on the Charlie Rose Show where he showed no hesitation in defending Israel’s handling of the raid (9 dead), something that President Obama had been reluctant to do.
Obama picked Biden “…who is about as close to the pro-Israel community as any member of either house…” observed MJ Rosenberg, a former AIPAC staffer, on TPM Café, just after Biden’s selection. “Biden is rated 100 per cent by AIPAC. When he goes to the synagogues in Florida, he goes not as a visitor but as ‘mishpocha’ [family]. The Jews simply love the guy… Bottom line, the Biden choice pretty much eliminated Obama’s ‘Jewish problem.” That was then and now it doesn’t seem to matter what position Obama takes, Biden seems to answer to his real boss. And it ain’t Barack. -CounterPunch (http://www.counterpunch.org/blankfort06112010.html)-
“I am a Zionist. You don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist.” -Joe Biden-
“Pollard should be given leniency.” -Joe Biden-
Pollard was the Israeli spy who caused the death of many U.S. spies in Russia, by revealing their identities. This is the very definition of treason. Israel is not our friend. Israel is the only country who continuously commits terrorist acts against the United States.
Enough said there Joe…
Here’s the self-proclaimed Zionist Joe Biden on the Charlie Rose show talking about the recent flotilla killings by Israeli soldiers of Turkish peace activists, calling for Israel to investigate itself on the murders in international waters:
≈
#3 Nancy Pelosi – Pelosi reaffirms that “America and Israel share an unbreakable bond: in peace and war; and in prosperity and in hardship.” [Pelosi Press Release: http://web.archive.org/web/20060202151116/democraticleader.house.gov/press/releases.cfm?pressReleaseID=999] Pelosi emphasized that “a strong relationship between the United States and Israel has long been supported by both Democrats and Republicans. America’s commitment to the safety and security of the State of Israel is unwavering… however, the war in Iraq has made both America and Israel less safe.” Pelosi’s voting record shows consistent support for Israel. Prior to 2006 elections in the Palestinian Authority, she voted for a Congressional initiative disapproving of participation in the elections by Hamas and other organizations defined as terrorist by the legislation. She agrees with the current U.S. stance in support of land-for-peace. She has applauded Israeli “hopeful signs” of offering land, while criticizing Palestinian “threats” of not demonstrating peace in turn. She states, “If the Palestinians agree to coordinate with Israel on the evacuation, establish the rule of law, and demonstrate a capacity to govern, the world may be convinced that finally there is a real partner for peace”.
During the 2006 Lebanon War, Pelosi voted in favor of Resolution 921 on the count that “the seizure of Israeli soldiers by Hezbollah terrorists was an unprovoked attack and Israel has the right, and indeed the obligation, to respond”. She argues that organizations and political bodies in the Mideast like Hamas and Hezbollah “have a greater interest in maintaining a state of hostility with Israel than in improving the lives of the people they claim to represent”. Pelosi asserts that civilians on both sides of the border “have been put at risk by the aggression of Hamas and Hezbollah” in part for their use of “civilians as shields by concealing weapons in civilian areas”.
In September 2008, Pelosi hosted a reception in Washington with Israeli Knesset speaker Dalia Itzik, along with 20 members of Congress where they toasted the “strong friendship” between Israel and the United States. During the ceremony, Pelosi held up the replica dog tags of the three Israeli soldiers captured by Hezbollah and Hamas in 2006 and stated that she keeps them as a “symbol of the sacrifices made, sacrifices far too great by the people of the state of Israel”. Why should a representative of a state of our union be interested in the “state” of Israel? That’s how powerful the Israeli lobby is, and how infiltrated the United States government is. Here is Pelosi speaking at a Celebration of Israel’s 61st Independence Day, Washington, DC, 04/29/2009:
Once again, “You don’t have to be Jewish to be a Zionist.” -Joe Biden-
Ron Paul exposing Pelosi’s treasonous loyalty to Israel:
≈
#4 Daniel Inouye (Japanese American) – Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI) (eldest and by senatorial custom voted for in line of succession) as Chairman of the US Subcommittee on Defense, for his part, reaffirmed America’s commitment to the Zionist regime in a meeting with Ashkenazi and described Tehran’s uranium enrichment and long-range missile technologies as the ‘principal and most potent threat’ to Israel and the Middle East…
“I think that when the US helps Israel it actually helps itself,” he said.
≈
#5 Hillary Rodham Clinton (Secretary of State) – Mrs. Clinton is of course a staunch supporter of Israel, standing firm with her husband. One generally stands beside the most powerful lobby in the world, even if it’s for another country. To go against AIPAC is brave, but political scuicide.
Here she is speaking at AIPAC about Iran and America’s commitment to Israel, even while speaking about Israel’s war crimes and illegal settlements into Palestinian land – having the gall to refer to the Palestinians as neighbors of Israel, which was all Palestinian land before the brutal and violent Zionist takeover of this land.
“We are determined to keep moving forward along a path that ensures Israel’s future as a secure and democratic Jewish state living in peace with its Palestinian and Arab neighbors.” -Hillary Clinton-
“…and in dealing with this (Iran) threat, as I have said for a very long time, no option can be taken off the table (refering of course to the nuclear option).” -Hillary Clinton-
*** Notice the disturbing mix of United States and Israeli flags around the AIPAC podium and Mrs. Clinton. I can’t find any other country in which this mixing of flags happens. Talk about unpatriotic!
≈
#5 Timothy Geithner (Secretary of the Treasury) – A faithful member of the Council on Foreign Relations, The Bilderberg Group, The Center for Global Development (Board of Directors), The Economic Club of New York (trustee), The Bank for International Settlements – Committee On Payment and Settlement Systems (chairman)… as well as being the former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, A former employee of Kissinger Associates, A former member of the Group Of Thirty (G30), former Director of the Policy Development and Review Department (2001–2003) at the International Monetary Fund, and many other Zionist controlled exploits. In March 2008, after his 2007 efforts to reduce the capital required to run a bank (reserve), he arranged the rescue and sale of Bear Stearns. In the same year, he played a supporting role to his predecessor Henry Paulson, former CEO of Zionist Goldman Sachs, in the decision to bail out AIG just two days after deciding not to rescue (not Zionist enough) Lehman Brothers from bankruptcy.
His father, Peter F. Geithner, was the director of the Asia program at the Ford Foundation in New York in the 1990s. During the early 1980s, Peter Geithner oversaw the Ford Foundation’s micro-finance programs in Indonesia being developed by Ann Dunham Soetoro, President Barack Obama’s mother.
So what are his loyalties to Israel and Zionism?
Considering the above ties, and his employment under staunch Zionists Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, Henry Kissinger, and his assignment as president of the most powerful of non-governmental foreign banks called the New York Federal Reserve bank, and considering that Zionists do not generally hire from outside of “the club”, I’d say his resume defines his loyalties quite well.
Disappointingly, I couldn’t find any videos of Mr. Geithner expressing his particular brand of unwavering love for Israel, but I’m sure they are out there…
≈
#6 Robert Gates (Secretary of Defense) – So much for the “change” part of Obama’s Hope and Change campaign… Gates was made 15th Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (a private non-governmental organization) by George Bush Sr. and was heavily involved in the Iran-Contra Affair (a CIA, and not a U.S. government event – Oliver North was working for the CIA in his part as well). Gates was then made Secretary of Defense by the good son: George Bush Jr. in 2006.
And then Obama was apparently told to keep him on as the number 6 man in line for the presidency.
I suppose stranger things have happened…
Of Mr. Gates many corporate ventures, one that should raise eyebrows is his work with VoteHere, “a technology company which sought to provide cryptography and computer software security for the electronic election industry. Following his nomination, a White House spokeswoman said that Gates planned to sell all the stock he owns in individual companies and sever all ties with them if confirmed by the Senate.” This is what one might refer to as an unpresidented conflict of interest, as are all corporate ties which are directly effected by political power, but especially ones related to the voting in of so-called “elected officials”.
And we mustn’t forget his service on the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) regarding Iran and the “Iraq Study group”…
But he seems so… American! Could Robert Gates really be a Zionist? A supporter of Israel?
“As President Obama has affirmed, the United States’ commitment to Israels’ security is unshakable and our defense relationship is stronger than ever, to the mutual benefit of both nations… Our work together on missile defense technology is ongoing, and the United States will continue to ensure that Israel maintains its qualitative military edge.” -Robert Gates, April 27, 2010, C-SPAN.
Can someone explain to me why the United States is “sharing” our secretive missile defenses with Israel. Do we share it with anyone else with such fervor and public ceremony?
And how about the 200 nuclear warheads that Israel holds? Wonder where those came from…?
≈
#7 Eric Holder (Attorney General) – Where to begin with this guy…
(Note: The Israeli/Jewish/Zionist ADL is the most powerful lobby in the world.)
According to the European Union Times: “Eric Holder was the featured speaker at the Anti-Defamation League’s American Heritage Dinner on October 17, 2009, and praised ADL for its historic role in fighting all forms of intolerance and helping make the federal hate crimes law a reality. He called passage of ADL’s hate bill a “marvelous step of progress” and gratefully looks forward to close and continued cooperation with ADL in hate law implementation. ADL recently announced that, having spearheaded passage of The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Hate Crimes Prevention Act, it will now lead stage two, a massive national campaign to train lawyers to become hate crimes prosecutors. (Note: unconstitutional, and blatant encroachment on states rights).
Holder says that, having been personally frustrated over the past 11 years in his efforts to help pass the hate bill, as Attorney General he is determined to begin immediate enforcement. “. . .the new hate crimes legislation will arrive not a moment too soon. And on the day that it becomes law, we will hasten to begin using it.” (Note: To put people like me in jail for reporting the truth, as stated by Zionists themselves?)
Here are highlights of Holder’s speech – full of praise for ADL – and misrepresentations concerning the new hate law and the alleged “epidemic of hate” it claims to address.
“You – the members of the Anti-Defamation League – and I go way back. I first began convening meetings with members of the ADL in the early 90′s when I served as the United States Attorney in Washington, D.C. . . At that time I expressed my deep appreciation for the fact that you always have served as indispensable allies in some of the most important work our government does. And now, tonight, I once more have the opportunity to stand in solidarity with you, and to thank you for your constant, steadfast work to create a better country. A country free of discrimination; a country free of violence; a country free of hate. The Obama Administration could ask no better partner than the Anti-Defamation League as we jointly strive to attain the ideals of equal opportunity, equal rights, and equal justice for all. Members of the ADL – I salute you.”
Equal rights for all? That’s not what Holder said in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee this spring. He asserted that the hate bill does not protect Christian ministers, whites, heterosexuals, policemen and members of U.S. military. Only favored groups, he said, such as homosexuals, blacks, Latinos, Jews, Muslims, and women will benefit under this new law:
In Holder’s speech to the ADL he continues this charade, asserting that under America’s new hate law “we will also continue to defend vigilantly the civil rights of all people in this country and prosecute criminal acts discrimination wherever we find them.” “The new law expands the list of protected categories beyond race, color, religion or national origin, and for the first time, allows the federal government to prosecute violence undertaken because of the actual or perceived gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability of any person.”
Holder gives every impression, as ADL did through 19 years of hyping their hate bills to state and federal legislators, that all Americans are protected under hate laws according to “race, color, religion, or national origin.” In reality, ADL never intended any of its hate laws in America – or throughout the world – to protect anyone except those groups ADL considers victims of white, Christian, male, heterosexual civilization.
Holder goes on to note that “the desperate need for a strengthened federal law enforcement capability against hate crimes has been perfectly clear.” Perfectly clear? …What is perfectly clear is that there exists no “desperate need” for federal takeover of local law enforcement.
Further, Holder said that about 7,500 hate crimes a year since 1990, averaging one every hour of the day, “is a staggering figure. . .completely unacceptable.” Actually, out of an average of 11 million crimes annually reported by police to the FBI, alleged hate crimes average only 1/10 of one percent – hardly a level of criminal activity of the epidemic proportion portrayed by Holder and ADL. Less than five percent of these reported hate crimes have ever been established as fact by courts of law, yet Holder says the level of unreported level of hate crimes in America is probably “in the tens of thousands. This fact is enough to make one’s blood run cold.” Fact? How credible is an Attorney General who regards such undocumented speculation as “fact?”
Holder says, “The stubborn persistence of anti-Semitism saddens me” What is anti-Semitism? ADL’s Office of Global Anti-Semitism in the U.S. State Department says “anti-Semitism” means any “strong criticism” of Israel or its leaders, or claims that the Jews had Christ killed. Holder says any such anti-Semitic “hate speech” even as “a casual joke made in private when the speaker thinks no Jewish person is listening,” is very, very bad. It “should scald the conscience of every American.” He also promises that Muslims will be vigorously protected under America’s new hate law, just as they are in Canada, Britain, France and Australia.
Holder concludes with more flattery of ADL: “This organization has a great tradition of refusing to stand by when others are suffering. You are guided by your tenets (racism), your precepts (superiority), and your values (usury) to come to the aid of others who need help. And so, this evening, I humbly call upon you to join me and this new administration in reaching out to all our American neighbors.” (mine)
Note: The ADL and all lobbies are influential, to say the least. But in reality, these lobbies (especially the ADL) are actually writing the bills that are being passed in congress, by the senate, and by the President. This can no longer be called a lobby. It is more like a legislative branch of the government by proxy – unelected, unappointed, and unwanted!
≈
Well… that should be enough for now, I suppose. I doubt the presidency would go to Janet Nepalitano at #18 in line of succession. Though the thought is frightening!
Let’s have a look at a few more Zionist’s though before we go back to pretending it all ain’t so…
≈
The Republican Bush Cabinet – So that you don’t confuse the paradigm of left and right with regards to the power structure of government and the appointed officials under the last republican president, here is a video (you should watch the whole movie) which tells about the at least 32 duel-Israeli citizens appointed by George Bush to his cabinet:
Part 7:
Part 8:
≈
AIPAC – A good documentary program (subtitles) about the most powerful lobby in the United States (which is for a foreign country), the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee. “AIPAC” is the symbol for which Obama makes a large portion of his speeches, as the Israeli flag hangs in the oval office across from the Stars and Stripes.
Part 1:
Part 2:
Part 3:
Part 4:
Part 5:
Part 6: “…because Israel has no other friends in the world.”
On June 5, 2002, at the American Jewish Congress in Philadelphia, Executive Director of its Philadelphia region Joseph Puder stated that, “We are watching the high noon of American Jewish power in the United States, and it’s moving downward. … At the same time we have the influx of a large Muslim community … not like any other community. Every single one of their national organizations with the exception of the Islamic Supreme Council of North America is an Islamist organization.” He concludes, “In the next ten years when the final settlement over the Middle East crisis is going to take place, when the deal is going to be cut about Israel, it’s going to occur at the time of the maximum Muslim immigration, maximum insertion of Muslim political power, and that’s something we’ve got to watch out for.”
≈
Media in Israel – It is striking how similar the invasive, destructive, and disrespectful procedures of the Israeli military are compared to American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is not coincidence, as it is Israel who runs our government and by default, our military. We are Zionist Israels army, the new Red Army.
The agreement between Zionist owned media outlets in America and Israel very seldom let the real plight of the Palestinians at the hands of Israeli soldiers on their news.
And when anything against the status que happens in America, the Zionist owned and controled media in America is there to cover it with completely pro-Zionist, pro-Israel slant.
Here’s a bunch of Jewish Rabbis condemning Israel as an illegitimate state, and condemning Zionism as an Enemy of Jews. Instead of reporting an unbiased and newsworthy story, the media makes these brave men look like crazy outcasts, giving no airtime to explain why they are there:
And hey, here’s one that after reading all this should make you laugh as you cry!
≈
And so I ask you one more time, oh faithful reader and free-thinker… Why does the United States government support Israel so passionately?
Answer: Zionism has complete and total stranglehold on all aspects of government, entertainment, media, banking, inteligence, and corporate structure.
Short Answer: America is Zionist Israel’s bitch!!!
≈
REALITY BLOG 
