This was what I stated out loud to myself as I came to the cognitive realization that the best possible comparison of just what is the “Union” created by the Constitution of the United States is to that of a simple, organized labor (trade) union. They are a dime a dozen. Pick two and let’s compare them in their similitude.
In 1828, Webster defined what a corporation is before we had a McDonalds and Starbuck’s on every other corner, before malls and stip-malls existed. Before this, corporations were pools of organized labor and trade, such as the Virginia and East India Company, which, once settled as colonies, became bodies politic. In other words, they became politically but not naturally “independent” trade unions – commercial entities (artificial persons/corporations) under a central government.
CORPORATION – noun – A body politic or corporate, formed and authorized by law to act as a single person;a society having the capacity of transacting business as an individual. Corporations are aggregate or sole. Corporations aggregate consist of two or more persons united in a society, which is preserved by a succession of members, either forever, or till the corporation is dissolved by the power that formed it, by the death of all its members, by surrender of its charter or franchises, or by forfeiture. Such corporations are the mayor and aldermen of cities, the head and fellows of a college, the dean and chapter of a cathedral church, the stockholders of a bank or insurance company, etc. A corporation sole consists of one person only and his successors, as a king or a bishop. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
INCORPORATE –adjective – [in and corporate.] 1.Not consisting of matter; not having a material body… (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
CORPORATE –adjective – [Latin , to be shaped into a body, body.] 1.United in a body, or community,as a number of individuals,who are empowered to transact business as an individual; formed into a body; as a corporate assembly, or society; a corporate town.2.United; general; collectively one. They answer in a corporate voice. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
–=–
For years I have been challenged by the purest of unlearned, unregenerate contrarians in my dissertation and source material that the United States is indeed a corporation nation. Such a challenge 230 years ago would have been met with outrage, humiliating laughter, and public flogging as that of being a ridiculous assertion, that of course each nation is and by definition must be a corporation (called also as a body politic). Since we defined in detail just what a municipal corporation is in my last post, there is no need to further clarify here again that every district, city, county, and state government (municipal, body politic) is also a corporation — as a legal, fictional body without a material body. One cannot use the word body politic without meaning a corporation (artificial person at law). The two words are in sameness. And in the end, this means one very important thing. They’re all fiction. They don’t really Exist in Reality. No one is actually born in a nation. One is contracted and given a legal person (status) in the nation (corporation) or one is considered a foreigner (as one without lean, an alien). There is nowhere anyone can point to and say that this physical, tangible thing is or proves the actual Natural Existence of the “United States” or any other nation (corporation), any more than you can point to a Steven King novel as proof of the Natural Existence of IT or Randall Flagg. These are fictional characters and made up (incorporated) places, every one. They must be believed in to have artificial existence and authority. And yet, not ironically, they are used as the excuse to commit the worst possible crimes against Reality and Its Law of Nature.
Likewise, there are actually contrarians out there that will tell you that no “commerce” exists as a function of government. This ridiculous assertion, of course, is defeated by simply reading the constitution and US Code. In fact, without the infamous “interstate commerce” clause and its ability to control it, the United States would have little if anything to do but play with itself, all alone in its little, foreign district, completely outside of the 50 States in actual union.
Tell me why I need a surety bond to do business with the United States? Key words, here, are do business. How can I do business with the “United States” unless “United States” is a business (corporation)?
But do these definitions alone make the United States just another commercial company of the main Crown corporation under the thumb of the Vatican’s spiritual jurisdiction and civil authority?
Well, firstly we must define terms…
Just what is trade? What is commerce? Are they the same thing?
Perhaps a better question is, what in the United States is not considered as commerce?
(Hint: citizenship is commerce!)
COMMERCE – noun – 1. In a general sense, an interchange or mutual change of goods, wares, productions, or property of any kind, between nations or individuals, either by barter, or by purchase and sale; trade; traffick. Commerce is foreign or inland. Foreign commerce is the trade which one nation carries on with another; inland commerce or inland trade, is the trade in the exchange of commoditiesbetween citizens of the same nation or state. Active commerce. 2.Intercourse between individuals; interchange of work, business, civilities or amusements; mutual dealings in common life. 3.Familiar intercourse between the sexes. 4.Interchange; reciprocal communications; as, there is a vast commerce of ideas. –verb intransitive – 1.To traffick; to carry on trade.2.To hold intercourse with. And looks commercing with the skies. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
TRADE – noun – [Latin tracto, to handle, use, treat.] 1. The act or business of exchanging commodities by barter; or the business of buying and selling for money; commerce; traffic; barter. Trade comprehends every species of exchange or dealing, either in the produce of land, in manufactures, in bills or money. It is however chiefly used to denote the barter or purchase and sale of goods, wares and merchandise, either by wholesale or retail. Trade is either foreign, or domestic or inland. Foreign trade consists in the exportation and importation of goods, or the exchange of the commodities of different countries. Domestic or home trade is the exchange or buying and selling of goods within a country. Trade is also by the wholesale, that is, by the package or in large quantities, or it is by retail, or in small parcels. The carrying trade is that of transporting commodities from one country to another by water… 3. Business pursued; occupation; in contempt; as, piracy is their trade. Hunting their sport, and plund’ring was their trade…5.Employment not manual; habitual exercise. 6.Custom;habit; standing practice.Thy sin’s not accidental, but a trade. 7. Men engaged in the same occupation. Thus booksellers speak of the customs of the trade. – verb intransitive – To barter, or to buy and sell; to deal in the exchange, purchase or sale of goods, wares and merchandise, or any thing else; to traffic; to carry on commerce as a business. Thus American merchants trade with the English at London and at Liverpool; they trade with the French at Havre and Bordeaux, and they trade with Canada… 2.To act merely for money… – verb transitive – To sell or exchange in commerce.They traded the persons of men.Ezekiel 27:12… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
–=–
To the legal mind, that is, the immoral or amorally-based mind, marriage and its consummation is as well nothing but an act of commerce. Trade and barter is commerce. Money in all forms is commerce. And so is amusement, business, communication, and the mutual dealings (transactions/interchanges) in everyday life.
Of course, the most valuable trade was in slaves, the commerce of souls…
So what’s left? What part of life is not considered commerce by the legal societies and policy-makers?
The answer: no part of the fictional, commercial life of a public, common person (national citizenship) is not considered a commercial activity. A person is a vehicle for commerce and nothing else. For a man is never actually the person (status) he pretends to be in legalistic affairs, only pretending to be in sameness with that fictional character. Even driving the kids to school in a legal (illegitimate/fictional) marriage between two legal persons of the United States corporation is considered as commerce:
FAMILY CAR – Automobile used to send owner’s children to school was“family car.” (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
FAMILY AUTOMOBILE DOCTRINE – The doctrine is that one who owns and maintains an automobile (car) for the general use of his household makes use of automobile for such purposes a part of his business so that any member using automobile for those purposes under general authority to do so becomes his representative, for whose negligence he is responsible. It is an extension of the principle of respondeat superior to the relation created by operation of family use automobile. See, also, Family Car Doctrine and Family Purpose Doctrine. It is based on theory that members of family were engaged in a joint enterprise or that child was agent of parents.If an automobile is owned and maintained by a family corporation for general use of a family,such as that of corporation’s manager and one of its principal stockholders, corporation may be held liable under the “family automobile doctrine” to third parties. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
In fiction, there is no such thing as a Real family, for no actual bodies exist in an incorporate state. Persons are fiction. Thus the marriage between to individuals (persons) simply creates a new incorporation, a joint personhood. It’s just words on paper, and of course illegitimate in the eyes of God and Nature, such persons having no existence in Nature. You see, for governmental, legalese purposes, a family is a business (corporation). A corporation is legally a “family” by definition. And of course all the kings subjects call the king as father. America has its founding “fathers,” having no idea what this term actually means, for every corporation (family) has a father (founder).
We must remember the fictional aspect of everything legally created, including a “family” (nation/corporate body) of legal persons. Again, when two United States persons as public citizenships get married, this is not a Real marriage in Nature between a male and a female, but instead the incorporation of two fictional (sexless) surnames, as two persons (individuals) become incorporated into one artificial body (artificial person). Thus, every action taken in the corporate marriage is a commercial act, even driving to the grocery store and tucking the kids into bed at night. It can be no other way, for the legal (commercial) persons incorporated in legal marriage are nothing more or less than commercial vessels of the United States. Persons (including individuals, corporations, associations, etc.) have no other purpose than as vessels in international/interstate commerce. And United States persons (citizenships) are always, without exception, foreigners in whatever State (territory) they reside in. The United States is always foreign to every other State or nation, and every State is private (foreign) to the United States and to each other. This is basic law.
Think about it this way… if you get married in The Matrix, a simulation of Reality, does that mean you got married in Real Life? Beware the paradox!
Again, nothing of Nature, nothing of God exists in a legal marriage, for the God of Nature is not the creator of persons (legal status in society). God, in other words, is Truth, and there is nothing but lies in the legal fiction world of men. There is no commerce in Nature, only the Truth of Natural Existence and Its Law, of Life Itself. There is only Existence alone, without words to describe or define it. It just Is… the supremacy of Being. But everything a legal person does is in fact a commercial (fictional) activity, a well told and registered lie, for persons are without exception only ever agents of government. There is no other purpose for establishing personhood than commercial activity, be it for protection, insurance, employment, or some other artificial security. When you sleep at night, the person you play in public is still considered active, which is why you can be insured for theft in the middle of the night. It is the person that the claim is made under, not the man using and posing as the person (strawman) in commerce.
Notice in the definition above that trade comes from the root of the word “use.” To use is just another word meaning to employ. Slaves were forcibly employed (used) for both commerce (trade) and labor, an alternative but certainly proper use of the legal word. Today, slavery is voluntary, ranging from contractual wage slavery to the performance debt entailed by the contractual relationship that is public citizenship. The only difference between a slave and an employee is that the employee is a prostitute, a mercenary, a laborer for hire, also called a hireling. This is a neutral term, and nothing to be offended at. The truth is often uncomfortable when understood for the first time, yet the truth can never actually offend, only set one free of one’s own lies and self-deceptions. I assure you that any and all employees of every corporation fall under the title of “hireling” as defined below. There is no public shame in this simply because the public is clueless of what exactly their shameful, public (vulgar/lowest) status means. The public is a body corporate of individual prostitutes (agents/employees), nothing more, nothing less. That is the nature of being in citizenship. No other purpose exists for citizenship than commerce. When prostituion in mammon is the custom for all “citizens” (as employees) to aspire to, and when the entire culture and education system rears nothing but prostitutes seeking a job after graduation, then who can possibly point to another US citizen-ship and accuse them of such a horrific venture in commerce? Even our parents beg us to “get a job” when we are ready to be properly used (employed) at the age of consent. It’s been built into our wage-slave culture, our entertainments, and our judgements over each other. And what is the societal misconception — that one is a loser or lazy if one is unemployed (not being used)? Amazingly, this amounts to nothing but the worship of and agentic relationship with mammon, with money, taking us all away from the simple lifestyle of tending to the land to support ourselves, our families, our neighbors, our friends, and anyone else that charitably needs what the earth provides to all without consideration of commerce, of trade, or of the greed that only money and the false valuation of our priceless Nature can cause.
EMPLOYED – This signifies both the act of doing a thing and the being under contract or orders to do it. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition)
EMPLOY – To engage in one’s service; to USE as an AGENT or SUBSTITUTE in transacting business; to commission and intrust with the management of one’s affairs; and, when used in respect to a servant or hired laborer, the term is equivalent to hiring,which implies a request and acontract for a compensation,and has but this one meaning when used in the ordinary affairs and business of life.(–Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition)
EMPLOY – verb transitive – [Latin plico.] 1.To occupy the time, attention and labor of; to keep busy, or at work; to use. We employ our hands in labor; we employ our heads or faculties in study or thought; the attention is employed, when the mind is fixed or occupied upon an object; we employ time, when we devote it to an object. A portion of time should be daily employed in reading the scriptures, meditation and prayer; a great portion of life is employed to little profit or to very bad purposes. 2.To use as an instrument or means. We employ pens in writing, and arithmetic in keeping accounts. We employ medicines in curing diseases. 3.To use as materials in forming any thing. We employ timber, stones or bricks, in building; we employ wool, linen and cotton, in making cloth. 4.To engage in one’s service; to use as an agent or substitute in transacting business; to commission and entrust with the management of one’s affairs. The president employed an envoy to negotiate a treaty. Kings and States employ embassadors at foreign courts. 5.To occupy; to use;to apply or devote to an object; to pass in business; as, to employ time; to employ an hour, a day or a week; to employ one’s life. To employ one’s self, is to apply or devote one’s time and attention; to busy one’s self. – noun – That which engages the mind, or occupies the time and labor of a PERSON; business; object of study or industry; employment. Present to grasp, and future still to find. The whole employ of body and of mind. 1.Occupation, as art, mystery, trade, profession. 2. Public office; agency; service for another. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
HIRELING – noun – One who is hired,or who serves for wages. 1.A mercenary; a prostitute. – adjective – Serving for wages; venal; mercenary; EMPLOYED for money or other compensation…(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
–=–
Yes, we are so dumbed down as a society in commercial enslavement that we even employ our selves! We pay our own fictional persons (legal status in the national labor union) while we (as men) do all the work, and in return give government a cut in taxes and other extortions. How stupid is that? In other words, like all unions, we are paying the government mob-style for protection against ourselves as our own boss (employer)! Our taxes are merely dues, the protection money collected by the mob and its enforcement goons. And in exchange, our rented strawman of a person (legal status) receives both employee and consumer rights and protections from the federal union and its United States corporation (the district). Why else would you pay a for fictional character, a strawman, that only exists in “UNITED STATES” and its commercial jurisdiction? And why else would you continue to pay “UNITED STATES” taxes when you are working overseas in a different trade union (nation)? Protection money… that’s all it is! And sometimes the word protection means a knock on the head or a bullet in the gut or perhaps a stay in jail. After all, it is the right of all citizens to be put in pain, punished, taxed, licensed, and extorted (exacted) from. That’s straight outta US Code!
We can of course look at other nations (unions) and their origin to confirm this strange reality of fiction. We certainly cannot deny that the American colonies were originally properties of the Crown corporation, and were organized and run though various “companies” of that Crown, such as the Virginia Company of London, also called the London Company, and its infamous oversees partner the East India Company.
From the definition of corporation above, we can certainly understand what Canada and other countries under the Crown’s “commonwealth” and United Kingdom actually are. For you see, each city, each province, each country, and each nation are actually each separate corporations. They stand each as a corporation sole.
From my book (pages 350-51):
…This is the declaration of a line of kings (land lords), the same blood-line evoked in the British Crown coronation and false anointment ceremony in the public prayer of “may the king live forever…” This is, of course, a reference not to the man but to the Crown, passed from mortal man to mortal man in that immortal fiction of an inheritable corporation sole. May the crown corporation “live” (artificially) forever…
…The “Archbishop of Canterbury” is also an office held by a current living (mortal) man corporately (artificially) clothed in the corporation sole that is that flattering title. The office of Queen and King of England and of the United Kingdom are also in the form of corporation’s sole, where the current monarch carries a different corporate shell wherever she may travel. Elizabeth II currently presents her fictional self as the corporation sole entitled“Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the United Kingdom” in her most general artifice (office), though when she visits for political reasons the individual states of that kingdom, her entitled corporation sole will change into “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada,” “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Australia,” and even more specific-ally or locally as the corporation’s sole entitled “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Queensland” and “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta,” etc. These are merely artificial persons,different corporations for different districted legal jurisdictions. And we must not forget that these words used as titles of land masses are not land masses at all, but merely crown corporations (magic words) and jurisdictions in commerce with no tangible aspect at all. They are nouns/names and nothing else, built merely of words on paper pretended to be placed over territories (land) outlined on maps (simulacra) in legally created treaties. They are all fictions, just as all the cities, counties, states, and districts of the United States exist only on paper.They must be believed in (loved) to exist. This is the trap and legal matrix of the big legal lie, the antithesis to God’s Creation.
The “Lord Mayer of London” is also a corporation sole, as many offices both secular and ecclesiastical are, including the “Minister of the Government” of the Republic of Ireland and all “Vicars,” “Bishops,” and “Deans” of the church of England. Where allowed by state laws, each parish priest in the Catholic church is also a separate corporation sole. And off course, the “Registrar General,” as keeper of public records for the “taxed” and registered populous, is also in the form of a corporation sole…
–=–
With this understanding, that each city, province, and district in Canada and indeed all Crown corporation nations are indeed a separate corporation sole of the crown, we can now take a gander at how Canada’s governmental structure for commerce is set up, and why it is actually uniform in so many ways with both the United States and other nations, under the law of nations (maritime/admiralty, foreign, and interstate commerce). It’s a trade union, dummy!
Our northern neighbor named as the trade union “Canada,” of course, had similar beginnings to the United States, and we can look at Canada today (being still openly under the mother Crown corporation) to see that this fact has never actually or officially changed. For Canadians didn’t revolt nor form a separate labor union by declaring “independence” from that middle management and holding corporation of the Crown/King. Here is a list of just the federal (i.e. Crown Corporation) companies still running the show in Canada (Wikipedia linked):
Yes, these are all companies (corporations) run by the “sovereign” Crown Corporation. Indeed, the introduction to this list states:
“Canadian Crown corporations are state-owned enterprises owned by the Sovereign of Canada (i.e. the Crown).[1][2][3] They are established by an Act of Parliament or Act of a provincial legislature and report to that body via a minister of the Crown in the relevant cabinet,[4] though they are “shielded from constant government intervention and legislative oversight” and thus “generally enjoy greater freedom from direct political control than government departments.“
–=–
Well, isn’t that nice? In other words, they are not only out of the control of the Canadian people as represented in government but “shielded” from the Canadian government’s oversight!
So who’s manning the roost? Who’s pulling the strings?
Why the Crown Corporation and its many artificial corporation soles, of course. The false god. The sovereign of the fictional realm…
So what went so differently in the United States?
Thanks to financial and economic mistreatment by the king of England at the time towards the Crown Corporation’s American colonies (defined as plantations/farms of the Crown), the slave-owning plantation and land owning freemasons got together and formed themselves a little congress, and then a union, as secretly and as behind the backs of management (the king) as any other labor union is formed today, and just as unwelcome by the head of any corporation.
So let’s look now at what a labor union is, what it entails, and what is the difference between a commercial nation (corporation) and an incorporated trade union?
A labor union is an organization that advocates for workers’ rights and benefits through collective bargaining.
How It Works:
Labor unionsrepresent workers in both the public and private sector. Individual labor unions represent workers in specific industries and function in an intermediary capacity between employers and employees. Unions negotiate directly with employers on employees’ behalf with regard to compensation, conditions and working hours.
Workers employed by transportation, shipping and manufacturing companies typically maintain contracts with labor unions. The unions agree to engage employers in collective bargaining in return for union dues withheld from payroll. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters and United Steel Workers are two prominent labor unions in the United States.
Why It Matters:
Labor unions protect workers from exploitation and ensure fairness of pay as well as safe, reasonable working conditions. Many economists argue that labor unions have a distortive effect on the labor market that results in decreased efficiency.
–=–
It appears the only difference between a nation and a trade/labor union is that one is local and one is universal (federal). In other words, one applies to a single corporation or type of corporate employee in trade while the other (national/federal) applies to all its federal members (citizenships) acting (in agency) as employees. Both are voluntary, contractual, legal relationships. However, each separately established trade union exists under the federal umbrella, just like the United Nations is taking over as the main trade union of the worlds nations of laborers and tradesmen.
So let’s consider for a moment…
Who sets minimum wage for laborers?
The United States (company).
Who creates all laws governing labor forces and employers (corporations) and their hirelings in America?
The United States (company).
Who created and administers OSHA?
The United States through its Department of LABOR.
“Under the OSH Act, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthful workplace. OSHA’s mission is to assure safe and healthful workplaces by setting and enforcing standards, and by providing training, outreach, education and assistance. Employers must comply with all applicable OSHA standards. Employers must also comply with the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act, which requires employers to keep their workplace free of serious recognized hazards.”
Sounds like a LABOR union to me! Actually, it sounds like fascism light…
How were these commercial companies (i.e. colonies) in the United States originally set up?
A Royal Charter from the Crown corporation.
How is a labor union set up?
A corporate charter from the federal corporation.
Hmm…
Let’s look at Fascist Italy as an example (from wikipedia) of where the idea of unions come from, and how they are part and parcel of the state. Notice that this charter was created in “articles,” just like the US Constitution and the Articles of Confederation. Coincidence, right?
The Charter of Labour of 1927 (Italian: Carta del Lavoro) was one of the main pieces of legislation Benito Mussolini, the Italian Fascist dictator from 1922–43, introduced in his attempts to modernise the Italian economy. The Charter was promulgated by the Grand Council of Fascism and publicized in the Lavoro d’Italia newspaper on April 23, 1927. It was mainly designed by Giuseppe Bottai, Under-Secretary of State of Corporations.
The Charter declared private enterprise to be the most efficient,[1] thus helping Mussolini to confirm the support of the rich industrialists who were the initial backers of Fascism. It insisted that state intervention was legitimate only where private enterprise was deficient.[2]
Article 1: “The Italian Nation is an organism having ends, life, and means of action superior to those of individuals, singly or in groups, of which it is composed. It is a moral, political, and economic unity, realized wholly in the Fascist State.”
Article 2: “Work, in all its intellectual, technical, and manual forms, is a social obligation. To this end, and only to this end, it is safeguarded by the State. The totality of production is unitary from the national point of view; its objectives are unitary and comprise the well-being of the producers and the development of national strength.”
Article 3: “There is freedom of professional or union organization. But only the union legally recognized by, and subject to, the control of the State — has the right to legally represent the entire category of employers or employees by which it is constituted […]; or to stipulate collective labor contracts binding on all those belonging to the category; or to impose on them dues, or to exercise on their behalf delegate functions of public interest.”
Article 4: “In the collective labor contract is found the concrete expression of the solidarity of the various makers of the product, by means of the conciliation of the opposing interests of the employers and the workers, and their subordination to the superior interests of production.”
Article 6: “Legally recognized professional associations insure the legal equality between employers and workers, maintain the discipline of production and work, and promotes its perfection.Corporations constitute the unitary organizations of production and integrally represent its interests […]. Corporations are recognized legally as organs of the State […].”
Article 7: “The corporative State considers private initiative, in the field of production, as the most efficient and useful instrument of the Nation.” [3]
Article 9 stated that: “State intervention in economic production may take place only where private initiative is lacking or is insufficient, or when are at stakes the political interest of the State. This intervention may take the form of control,encouragement ordirect management.” [4]
Article 13: “The duty of employment is under control of the corporate organs.Employers have the obligationto hire workers who are official members of the appropriate trades, and have the power to choose from the rolls of membership, giving precedence to the members of the party and the Fascist unions according to their seniority of membership.”
–=–
Perhaps the biggest giveaway here is the use of a constitution. Yes, my friends, labor unions are constituted.
Just how do you think the “Teamsters” got created in the first place?
–=–
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
CONSTITUTION
Adopted by the 26th International Convention June 25-29, 2001
As Amended by Special Convention April 30, 2002
INTRODUCTION
The Consent Decree entered on March 14, 1989, in
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, et al., 88 Civ. 4486 (S.D.N.Y.) (LAP), made certain amendments to the International Union’s Constitution that the courts have held are part of the Constitution despite the fact that they were rejected by the delegates to the 1991 International Convention.
The following Constitution includes Article XIX, Section 14, which is required by the Consent Decree. Language required by the Consent Decree but not approved by the delegates is printed in ITALICS. Those provisions are currently in effect…
So a labor union is formed by a delegation in a convention where a constitution is created… Does that sound familiar? It should. For the United States trade union was formed by a delegation of freemasons (an interstate brotherhood) in a continental convention where a constitution was created. LOL! Can it get any more obvious?
But wait, the ignorant, publicly educated, patriotic American worker demands, unions are wholly an American institution and good for the common worker, aren’t they? Isn’t that what we are told? Well sure, if you one of the few in the unions. But how is this possibly in harmony with the principles of equality and equity? It’s not, because its a fascist, communist ideal! It is exclusionary. It is the farthest from Natural Freedom possible. It’s organized crime.
In fact, like most agencies of government, including social security, we now have globalism in unions (From Wikipedia):
In 1969, the organisation received the Nobel Peace Prize for improving peace among classes, pursuing decent work and justice for workers, and providing technical assistance to other developing nations.[2]
The ILO registers complaints against entities that are violating international rules; however, it does not impose sanctions on governments.
–=–
Imagine a slave-owner declaring that his slaves should be part of his own plantation labor union, which guarantees work opportunities for all! What a joke. Improving peace (commerce) among classes, as they put it above.
Yes. You read that right. International standards under international law with governance by the United Nations (united trade/labor unions). Most American workers know nothing of international law or the law of nations or the difference between the two, nor have any idea that United States law is bound under that same law of nations, even though this is a well-known fact and even stated in the constitution. Even more on point, a large percentage of “specialized” attorneys as well are not familiar with the law of nations. Specialization breeds ignorance and corruption, not only in law but in the medical, scientific, education (university syndicalism), and even labor fields. More to the point, it breeds dependence on the system — a system built on the ignorance of specialized trades and labor pools. How deliciously ironic.
Article VI § 2 states clearly that “treaties made or which shall be made under the authority of the United States” will form part of “the supreme law of the land… any thing in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding,” while Article II empowers the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to “make treaties.” In other words, at any time, foreign or international law can become part of the law of the land (due process of law). Nothing is sacred, not even the constitution, for the constitution allows not only for its own alteration (amendment) and suspension, as all constitutions ever written do, but also that at any time congress can change and alter the law to their purview. They can even alter or add to the articles (amendments) of the constitution by calling a convention, just like the Teamsters. With changing times and moral degradation as we see today in this society, so too does the law change to suit that dis-eased condition of the minds of agentic men.
From Constitution.org, we may read the history of the United States under the law of nations from its inception:
Art. I Sec. 8 Cl. 10 of the Constitution for the United States delegates the power to Congress to “define and punish … Offenses against the Law of Nations“. It is important to understand what is and is not included in the term of art “law of nations”, and not confuse it with “international law”. They are not the same thing. The phrase “law of nations” is a direct translation of the Latin jus gentium, which means the underlying principles of right and justice among nations, and during the founding era was not considered the same as the “laws”, that is, the body of treaties and conventions between nations, the jus inter gentes, which, combined with jus gentium, comprise the field of “international law”. The distinction goes back to ancient Roman Law.
Briefly, the Law of Nations at the point of ratification in 1788 included the following general elements, taken from Blackstone’s Commentaries, and prosecution of those who might violate them:
(1) No attacks on foreign nations, their citizens, or shipping, without either a declaration of war or letters of marque and reprisal.
(2) Honoring of the flag of truce, peace treaties, and boundary treaties. No entry across national borders without permission of national authorities.
(3) Protection of wrecked ships, their passengers and crew, and their cargo, from depredation by those who might find them.
(4) Prosecution of piracy by whomever might be able to capture the pirates, even if those making the capture or their nations had not been victims.
(5) Care and decent treatment of prisoners of war.
(6) Protection of foreign embassies, ambassadors, and diplomats, and of foreign ships and their passengers, crew, and cargo while in domestic waters or in port.
(7) Honoring of extradition treaties for criminals who committed crimes in a nation with whom one has such a treaty who escape to one’s territory or are found on the high seas.
And, although it was not yet firmly established with all nations in 1788,
(8) Prohibition of enslavement of foreign nationals and international trading in slaves.
To expand on point (2), Blackstone, in discussing border passes, stated “by the law of nations no member of one society has a right to intrude into another … [I]t is left in the power of all states, to take such measures about the admission of strangers, as they deem convenient.”
It’s just the for-profit ethics of international commerce — the sea trade. In essence, it is the logistics of human trafficking in every way.
Of course, most powerful nations are run by either the queen and king or by their bloodline of royal cousins (lesser kings and queens). World War I, for instance, was nothing more and nothing less than a war between ruling family members of the same family — cousins pretending to fight cousins. There was no winner of these wars, nor was there a loser, for the order of inheritance of that bloodline would never change. Only a planned, purposeful shift in the balance of power and the profits of war (weapons, death, and destruction) and thus reconstruction was divided between the family, creating new familial (corporate) mergers and acquisitions, and new treaties born from the lawlessness of war. Only in war may the lawless law of necessity be invoked, allowing for any and every law to be altered or suspended. It is ridiculous to consider these wars of the “world” as anything but a reorganization of the corporation nations (unions) under bloodline rule, and only secondarily as a forced culling of the common (vulgar) goyim populaces of each. War is business, the ultimate commercial venture, plain and simple.
And, of course, what happens after war?
Why free-flowing commerce again between all the nations, of course.
What are wars fought? Because commerce is being blocked somewhere between the nations, either accidentally or intentionally (i.e. false flag) to start the war.
So what is peace really? Free flowing commerce between nations.
And so in times of peace, the nations must not only control but enforce the rules of the international law of commerce while adhering to the law of nations. Since slavery is all but poo-poo’d therein, this complicated system of labor management must be implemented, from the basic minimum wage to the most selective of trade unions.
And so we can not fool ourselves any longer with the romanticism and glory-filled fables of the founding fathers and the origins of the United States. For all intents and purposes, Philadelphia was set up as nothing more and nothing less than an international hub for international trade. It did not make men free, but rather protected slavery and indenture (contract labor). In fact, its whole purpose was to control and regulate the labor force and trade of commodities. To believe that these Crown corporations (colonies) had any other purpose than to expand trade under the Crown’s empire is of course a fools errand. And to believe that the subsequent founding of the United States was anything but the founding of a politically but not naturally “independent” trade union is purely the result of a lifetime of public education steeped in propaganda and lies — the false religion of patriots.
It’s a labor (trade) union, dummy!
This article from Unionplus.com explains the process. Pay close attention to the details…
A labor or trade union is an organization of workers dedicated to protecting members’ interests and improving wages, hours and working conditions for all.
No matter what you do for a living, there’s a union with members who do the same thing. Unions represent:
• mechanics,
• teachers,
• factory workers,
• office workers,
• actors,
• musicians,
• police officers,
• construction workers,
• airline pilots,
• janitors,
• plumbers,
• doctors,
• pharmacists,
• IT/computer professionals,
• government workers at all levels,
• engineers,
• writers,
• nurses,
• and many more types of workers.
Unions work like a democracy.They hold elections for officers who make decisions on behalf of members, giving workers more power on the job.
A local union is a locally-based group of workers with a charter from a national or international union such as the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) or United Auto Workers (UAW). A local may include workers from the same company or region. It may also have workers from the same business sector, employed by different companies.
How to form a union:
It starts with the formation of a bargaining unit, a group represented by a union for dealing with an employer.
It is legal for employers to try to persuade employees not to unionize. However, it is illegal for an employer to prevent employees from unionizing through threats, violence, and other coercive action.
An employer is required by law to bargain in good faith with a union,although an employer is not required to agree to any particular terms. Once an agreement is reached through negotiations, a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) is signed.
After a CBA is signed, an employer can’t change details of the agreement without the union representative’s approval. The CBA lasts for a set period of time with the union monitoring to assure the employer abides by the contract. To learn more about collective bargaining and how unions work, visit CollectiveBargainingFacts.com.
As with many other organizations, union costs are paid by member dues that typically cost about $50 a month. Most unions have paid staff to manage their operations. While some staff may be paid by union dues, members also often volunteer.
Everyday benefits to help working families
The collective buying power of union members is also used by Union Privilege to negotiate consumer benefit programs for working families.
Union Plus benefits and discounts are for union members and Working America members. Benefits include everything from financial services and legal services to discounts on AT&T wireless, travel, car rentals, flowers, entertainment and more.
Benefits also include unique assistance for workers facing financial hardship due to disability,layoff (unemployment),strike and more.
NOTE: No union dues money goes into the development or operation of any Union Plus program.
Hmm… so labor unions work just like democracies do? Interesting… no wonder the economy is so fucked up, considering that democracy is the worst governmental structure possible before tyranny takes over. As I’ve given those quotes before, I will just reference my book here where democracy is exposed for what it really is. (Download book for free and see pages 140-45 at strawmanstory.info)
I have only one question: Why in hell wouldn’t a corporation that was unionized move its manufacturing to China or Mexico or Indonesia for cheap labor? Why should a guy with a beer belly driving a forklift make $60 an hour plus a continued, ridiculous salary for their retirement after 20 years? How is that rational? It only works in the money system, in mammon. It’s purpose is not to help the worker but to destroy the economy and ability of the nation to compete, so as to go global!
Now I can finally understand what patriotism actually is. For it is strongest amongst union members — those who benefit the most from organized trade (organized crime of government), which by its very definition is pointless without the purposeful exclusion of all others. Patriotism and Zionism are virtually the same thing. Such unionization is merely a product of mammon, of the evil that money causes men to do both directly and indirectly to other men, be it wars against nations or the patriotic stomping upon “scabs” that seek to feed their families at a lower wage. It’s really not unlike prostitution in this way at all, each unionized whore defending her own corner and glorifying out of necessity the very organized pimp that protects her (through abuse and extortion) in that organized trade union of pimped-out whores. Don’t stand on their corner, girl, cause them unionized bitches will cut you…
And tell me something… what is the difference between being a non-union member and an illegal alien?
Answer: there is no difference. You are either a member/citizen or you are not, and so you either have special privileges others do not or you don’t. Nothing could be further from the principles of True equitableness (conformity to the Law of Nature) than this.
Now, from the list above, let’s see if the so-called “congress assembled” fulfilled the above 5 requirements to form a corporation (body politic) of States (People) united? Let’s answer these questions and find out:
(1) Did the United States form a bargaining unit (i.e. congress), as a group representing a union of commercial entities (i.e. the colonies/states in union) for dealing with a principal employer/user (employer/king) in commerce? Certainly they did!
(2) Debate as to unionize or not certainly took place, e.g. the federalists and non-federalists. And they certainly tried to persuade the king (employer) in a host of good and bad ways, such as the Boston Tea Party. As a sovereign (false god) though, the king could make threats, commit violence, and use other coercive actions all he liked per the already established union contract of his companies (colonies). Turns out, through Executive Orders, so too can the United States in its own sovereign capacity. Just look at the civil war…
(3) Was there negotiations? Of course. Was the king (principal of the “collective” Crown Corporations) required to accept any particular terms? Obviously not, since war insued shortly thereafter. Was a collective bargaining agreement signed, like say, the constitution for the united States and a treaty of peace (free-flowing commerce)? Yep.
(4) Is the constitution changeable without the union’s representatives (congress’s) approval? Nope.
(5) Are union costs and dues paid by the states and the common laborers (citizenships) thereof? Absolutely. In politics it’s called taxes though.
To answer in another way:
How was the US formed as a trade “Union”?
1. The Union started with a congressional unit for bargaining, as a confederation (conspiracy/combination of unsatisfied men), who represented each State (land-holding People) in dealings with the King (employer, owner of company/colonies)
2. The anti-federalists would qualify as employees of the King seeking non-unionization (non-federalization).
3. The King did not and was not required to agree to the terms of the continental congress. After the war (quite violent negotiations), a treaty of peace agreement was signed, allowing the United States to be its own Trade “Union.”
4. The law and the constitution cannot be changed without congress and the president’s approval.
5. The Union of States is paid for by taxes from member employees (US citizenships) and corporations (artificial persons), as what is “due” for such member/citizen-ship. Citizenship is voluntary, as is membership to any union, and is an act of allegiance to that union, its laws, and its president.
–=–
Well, there you have it. The creation of the united States of America was basically the formation of a labor/trade union. Plain and simple. And like any automatous creation, the creation eventually got a bit out of the hands of its creator, the king. Or, at least, that’s what we are supposed to believe. We’ll keep pretending that nations stand in competition. After all, it keeps the false economy going.
Now don’t get me wrong, it wasn’t as if the indentured and common citizenry actually had a vote, and slaves certainly did not carry a voice in the matter. No, this was a bunch of land and plantation holders whining not for the benefit of their slaves, but for their own benefits as employees of the Crown Corporation. And so, when their desires were not met by the king, they formed their own “union” in trade (commerce), not the least of which was the protection of their own commerce in souls (slaves).
—=—
“How is it that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty among the drivers of negroes?”
—Samuel Johnson, quoted from: ‘Taxation No Tyranny – An Answer To The Resolutions And Address Of The American Congress.’
—=—
“For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty;
only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.”
—Galatians 5:13, KJB
—=—
In the constitution for the United States, the Commerce Clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress the power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations,and among the several states,and with the Indian tribes. And, of course, the Constitution, in its fourth Article, cannot be mistaken in this clear and concise statement:
“No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due.“
–=–
Most Americans, as common US citizens, don’t even know what the word “several” means, a word defined as private or foreign. Yes, each State (People) is foreign to the other, just as the United States (Washington D.C.) is foreign to all States and nations. And most will read this statement of the fourth Article and never fully grasp what is really being said. For like branded cattle, so too shall men be rounded up to be delivered to the People (State) they belong to as property!
Later, of course, with the passage of the reformation amendments (#13, 14, and 15), slaves were enfranchised (set legally free in an open air debtors prison) as national citizenships and, through the assigning of personhood (14th amendment citizenship) as newly incorporated commercial vessels, were suddenly unionized as the persons (property) of government. And so suddenly one could no longer string a “negro” (man with tainted blood) up from a tree without repercussions of law. Where before was just a negro now stood a person (status/property) of the United States corporation. Suddenly each negro was a valued property (voluntary slave) of government, and was protected as such. The slaves were allowed to join the labor/trade union in its lowest possible status of membership, called as public citizenship. This was called colloquially as freedom, which in legalese merely means franchise. And since that time, with the advent of the birth certificate process, we are all tricked into volunteering our children into such 14th amendment servitude (public/national citizenship), having no idea we are giving up our paternal rights and making all children as wards of the state (District of New Columbia). Slaves were not elevated as much as all others were devolved. Yet what slave “freed” from forced captivity would not gladly except the protections and benefits of freed (enfranchised) men? What slave would not embrace the union that tricked them into joining it, which without it they would surely perish? And now all US citizenships are of equal franchise, equal (civil) rights, as the lowest possible protected status possible. And in the end, isn’t that exactly what a labor union does? Do not unions organize and protect the lowest possible working class of laborers and tradesmen to make them “equalized,” as compared to the wealthy elite families that have always ruled through such trickery and unionization? The truth is that, just as it is said above that “unions work to make America strong,” so too did slaves and indentures before unionization (federalization). And so too does each nation now work to support the United Nations and other globalist efforts — one big labor union of earthlings, of “world citizens.”
You see, we have all been placed into the “district” of the United States jurisdiction, a place for the lowest class to reside in servitude. And yet most of us have no idea what a district really is:
—=—
DISTRICT:
“A division of territory.
1. Originally, the space within which a lord could coerce and punish — distrain. The circuit within which a man might be compelled to appear, or the place in which one hath the power of distraining.”
—William C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889, definition of ‘District.’
—=—
And what is a circuit? Why an enclosed space. A jurisdiction. In other words, an open-air prison for debtors (citizens). Citizenship is a contractual performance debt.
How may times have you heard that the United States is still a British colony? Well, it’s probably more accurate to say that the United States is still a commercial corporation of the Crown, seemingly independent as it may be. In other words, the people (citizenships) of the United States are about as independent from the Crown as an automobile worker is from the company he or she works for. That is, just because the employees (citizenships) are in a Union (i.e. a corporation/company called “United States”) doesn’t make them any less subjects of the Crown. The United States and its congress (Board of directors) are collective bargainers for their public citizenry, standing as a person in law. After all, the constitution was strictly a commercial, maritime deal. The union formed was for their own protection, not ours, just as labor unions are not inclusive of management and owners. This class distinction has not left us, though fools pretend it no longer applies. We were still slaves and indentures, or of families that had not yet even arrived in the country! Nothing changed on that front. No, in this case, the employees of the Crown Corporation were the land and plantation holders sent on Royal Charter here to set up just another trade corporation, a commercial hub dealing in international trade districted under the mother Crown corporation.
At this point, it seems so obvious! How did I not recognize this before?
Of course modern labor unions are labeled as “communist” for good reason, simply because they are run by the State, as state-controlled capitalism, not against it. While the US constitution was essentially the creation of a company store, where employees (citizenships) were paid in United States dollars (company script) and forced to use that script in place of any other form of trade with any other currency or metal.
So, for all intents and purposes, the United States of America is a corporation set up essentially as a trade union. It’s all about commerce.
As a similar example, let’s take a peak at the Egyptian trade union story:
Egyptian Independent Union Federation, 28 June 2011
Statement: In light of the growing controversy about the independent trade unions and malicious accusations and allegations aimed at undermining the Egyptian workers’ movement and the trade unions which it created, we, the representatives of the independent unions, are signing this statement of the fundamental principles on which they are being built and on which trade unions which represent workers are founded. 1. Independent unions have appeared in Egypt ending an era during which trade union work has been monopolised by the state and the ruling party. This is due to the struggle of the Egyptian workers and their sacrifices, and nobody can claim otherwise. At the same time we extend our thanks and greetings to all those who support the principles of trade union freedom and the right to organise so long as this support iswithout conditions. 2. The independent unions confirm their independence from all political parties, official institutions and organisations, human rights organisations, and individuals. The independent unions confirm that they only follow the wishes of the general assemblies of their members and that the principle of independence is a general principle which applies to all without exception. In the same vein, the independent unions assert that only elected representatives from the base of the unions have theright to speak on behalf of the trade unions and declare their positions, and that no outside parties have the right to do so, unless those positions have been agreed by the elected representatives of the independent unions. 3. The independent unions depend for their funding on the contributions of their members and will not accept financial support from any other source at home or abroad. The general assemblies have complete authority for the financial supervision of the unions. We affirm that this principle self-reliance and self-funding is an inseparable part of the principle of independence on which the unions were founded. 4. We affirm that this principle of independence dates from before the revolution and that the revolution came to bless this perspective and to issue laws to protecting this same principle, the first of which was the constitutional declaration on the right to form unions and the announcement of the principle of trade union freedoms. This declaration contributed to Egypt’s name being removed from the ILO blacklist of countries violating workers’ rights as did the draft law on trade union freedoms. We affirm that the principle of independence is not tied to an individual or a government but is a fundamental right of all of who work for a wage in this country, and they will not give it up in any circumstances. 5. The independent unions completely reject any form of normal relations with the Zionist enemy, as they reject all forms of co-operation with any person or organisation who is involved in normalisation or is calling for normalisation. We affirm our complete support for the right of the Arab Palestinian people to create an independent state in the whole of Palestine, and their right to use whatever means of resistance to achieve their rights. We affirm also that one of the principal reasons forour rejection of the old Egyptian Trade Union Federation is its subservience to the state and the National Democratic Party, and its participation in a visit to occupied Jerusalem and its failure to take any position opposing the policy of normalization, such as the QIZ [Qualified Industrial Zones] Agreement and the gas supply agreement and other policies which the Egyptian Trade Union Federation by its silence supported while the Egyptian workers’ movement rejected them and was resisting them. 6. The independent unions value the Arab people’s struggle for freedom and social justice. Long live the Egyptian Revolution! Eternal glory to the Martyrs!
Egyptian Independent Union Federation Signatories:
1. The Real Estate Tax Authority Union 2. The General Public Transport Authority Workers’ Union 3. The General Union of Civil Aviation Pilots 4. The General Union of Builders and Woodworkers 5. The Egyptian Peasants’ Union 6. The General Union of Antiquities Workers 7. The General Union of Sales Tax Workers 8. The General Union of Health Sciences 9. The General Independent Union of Teachers 10. The General Union of Communications Workers 11. The Manshiyet al-Bakri Hospital Workers’ Union 12. Du’aa Hospital Union 13. The General Union of Workers in the Ministry of Labour 14. The Media Production Workers Union 15. The General Union of Pensioners
Gee, doesn’t the Egyptian Trade Union Federation sound a lot like the United States federal corporation trade union and its government over all international and interstate trade/commerce, even down to its notorious beating of civil rights protestors as in American history? It loves the illegal occupation called Israel, that’s certainly in common.
So if a trade union and a nation can both be a federation, just what is a federation?
FEDERATION –noun – 1.The act of uniting in a league. 2.A league; a confederacy. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
CONFEDERACY – Criminal law. An agreement between two or more persons to do an unlawful act,or an act, which though not unlawful in itself, becomes so by the confederacy. The technical term usually employed to signify this offense, is conspiracy. (–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856)
CONSPIRACY – Criminal law, torts. An agreement between two or more persons to do an unlawful act,or an act which may become by the combination injurious to others…(–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856)
–=–
Of course! What is a union but an unwanted, unwelcome organization of conspirators against the company or already established union? Be it a workforce or a People, their union is but a combination of two or more people to do an unlawful act, unlawful either under the king, under the nation, or under the corporate by-laws.
Sorry folks. Just as the confederacy was a conspiracy against the United States, so too was the constitution a conspiracy against the king of England. The only difference is that the United States never officially recognized the confederacy as a union. If it had, it would not have been able to treat confederate citizens in such horrible ways. In other words, the “Union’s” actions would have fallen under the purview of the law of nations if the Confederacy was recognized as a separate union.
We can verify this easily, by visiting the government website for Appamotix Courthouse, where they tell us exactly why the north was able to treat its own members like dirt. For you see, a civil war never ends, it’s merely suspended until the next confederation (conspiracy/combination) of men attempt to form their own union:
Where was the treaty signed?
“There was no treaty signed to end the Civil War. The surrender at Appomattox Court House was a military surrender of an army which was surrounded. The Confederate government never surrendered and even had it wanted to the United States government would likely not have accepted. To do so would have legally acknowledged the existence of the Confederate States of America and would have legitimized it and given it certain legal status internationally. Treaties are between two nations and the U.S. would never concede the legal existence of the Confederacy – even though it had a government, armies, taxes and all the trappings of a modern government.”
Honestly, this simple explanation describes the evil underbelly of the so-called civil war, the war of Northern aggression, almost entirely. In essence, the “union” had no law, no moral or ethical considerations, and no peers on the international level. They could treat their fellow citizens considered still bound and inside of the union with absolute disregard under Executive Order, and they did. And just as the king sent his troops to preserve his own union (company) because he didn’t recognize the United States as a legitimate conspiracy (confederacy) and thus refused to concede its separate legal existence internationally and thus outside of his vast union of commercial companies, so too did the congressionally abandoned, now illegitimate United States completely disrespect the desires of its confederate states to be free and independent of that original confederated union. Conspiracy breeds conspiracy. This is not the story we are told in history class, that’s for sure. There was nothing honorable or patriotic about the civil war, and if anything, it should be a lesson to all of us in the common that we are considered property of the union, and certainly not free men. And as far as the modern ridiculousness of the state successionist movement, all one need do is read their state constitution to find that succession would be a treasonous crime and theft of territory and property from the Union, and those modern confederates would be equally punishable as was the original conspiracy (confederacy) to separate, for the succession would again not be recognized by the union and have no protection as a nation under the law of nations or international law. Only a fool believes that a civil war is about race. Civil is not skin color, its law. Roman law. And only one that is unlearned in this history can possibly believe that the North or its Union President Lincoln had the best interest of slaves as their goal. It was nothing more and nothing less than a war to preserve the corporate union. But more importantly, as we can read above, the truth about the civil war is that it never ended, for there were not two nations to sign a treaty. No, this was a smackdown, and still is. For by the Trading With The Enemies Act we are all still considered as potential conspirators, or as they legally refer to us, potential enemies of the state. Honestly, I’ve talked and reported on this so many times from primary sources that I won’t take the time to do it again here.
But wait just another minute… Doesn’t this Egyptian unionization document sound a lot like a Declaration of Independence, like they want to be independent from the first union and its government/king?
There are 15 unions listed above, all wanting independence from the federal or sovereign state. Doesn’t that sound a bit similar to the current 16 commonwealth realms of the Crown Corporation?
COMMONWEALTHSMAN –noun – One who favors the commonwealth, or a republican government. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
COMMONWEAL, COMMONWEALTH – noun – 1. An established form of government, or civil polity; or more generally, a state;a body politic, consisting of a certain portion of men united by compact or tacit agreement,under one form of government and system of laws. This term is applied to the government of Great Britain, which is of a mixed character, and to other governments which are considered as free or popular, but rarely or improperly, to an absolute government. A commonwealth is properly a free state; a popular or representative government; a republic; as the commonwealth of Massachusetts. The word signifies strictly, the common good or happiness; and hence, the form of government supposed best to secure the public good. 2. The whole body of people in a state the public. 3. The territory of a state; as, all the land within the limits of the commonwealth. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
WEAL –noun – [G., Latin , to be strong, to avail, to prevail. The primary sense of weal is strength, soundness, from the sense of straining, stretching or advancing.] 1. A sound state of a person or thing; a state which is prosperous, or at least not unfortunate, not declining; prosperity; happiness. As we love the weal of our souls and bodies. The weal or wo in thee is place. So we say, the public weal the general weal the weal of the nation or state. 2.Republic; state; public interest. [But we now use commonwealth, in the sense of state.] –noun – The mark of a stripe. [See Wale.]… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
–=–
What was it that Ben Franklin was quoted as saying after the signing of the constitution…? A republic, if you can keep it.
So how then is the United States different than any other “commonweal” of the Crown Corporation? That’s common welfare, not wealth. Big difference. Welfare is for the poor, common plebes like you and me. All the union States in compact are republics (commonwealths) too, kept by austerity and military force, in fact.
It is important to note here this word as it was meant to be understood, as a common weal, not the vulgar meaning of just monetary wealth.
The term “commonwealth” does not describe or provide for any specific political status or legal relationship when used by a state.[8]Those that do use it are equal to those that do not. A traditional English term for a political community founded for the common good, it is used symbolically to emphasize that these states have a “government based on the common consent of the people”[9] as opposed to one legitimized through their earlier colonial status that was derived from the British crown. It refers to the common “wealth”, or welfare, of the public[10] and is derived from a loose translation of the Latin term res publica.[a]
–=–
Social security is a tool of universal welfare, plain and simple. Pension funds are welfare for the middle class, and are as well mostly paid for by commonweal taxpayer dollars. Common welfare – this is exactly the term one might use in any corporate office, for the welfare of employees.
Common = corporate (united).
Union = common franchise under contract/compact
Franchise = legal (artificial) freedom, a district
Commonwealth = An incorporated state (people)
But if all the member states of the Crown Corporation, including the United Kingdom, are commonwealths, and all of the states in the American union are commonwealths as well, then where does that leave us? Is the world just one gigantic set of trade unions in commonweal controlled by a collaboration (conspiracy/confederation/combination) of centralized, federal ones? Well of course! This is not the earth, not Nature we are talking about, but the fictional world of commerce. The earth and its nature is already global. It can’t help itself for being that way (sorry flat-earthers) nor is its nature and shape a causality of man. But this commercial sphere must be shaped and textured by the commercial powers that be — the federal trade unions known as nations that operate under the international law of nations.
What are sanctions, for instance, but limitations on trade? A sanction is merely a punishment applied to worldwide commerce with a particular country, so that no trade may be done internationally therein. It’s like being having one’s membership to the commonwealth of the world taken away or limited for a period of time until agreement (contract) is made. Though international law has no sanctions, the law of nations is a club, a commonwealth of commercial states, and generally one of them (as the United States) is commissioned as the “evil” to bring obedience to some statute or condition of signed treaties. Before war, sanctions (punishments) are used to attempt to cause balance to worldwide commerce. In other words, smaller unions (nations) are allowed to exist as long as they play by the rules of the law of nations, and their regimes are subsequently toppled and replaced if they don’t. By comparison, all trade unions are under the thumb of the nation’s trade and employment cycle they effect, i.e. the United States. Internationally, more and more, all nations (unions) are under the purview of the United Nations. So what’s the difference?
Here’s an interesting read to put into perspective how close we indeed are to an international cooperative trade union (international) globalization:
The member states of the Commonwealth of Nations are mostly former British colonies, as is the United States, so why isn’t the United States a member of the Commonwealth of Nations?
There’s no reason it couldn’t be. It is simply too lazy to apply.
Many Americans think the USA would have to become a monarchy if it joined the Commonwealth, but this is simply not true. India, for example, is not a monarchy, but is in the Commonwealth.
Member countries do have to recognise the queen as Head of the Commonwealth, but that’s just like a country recognising Kofi Annan as the Secretary General of the United Nations, it doesn’t make her their queen.
Some people think that the USA would somehow be accepting ‘British rule’ if it was in the Commonwealth. Try telling India it is still ruled by Britain! In fact, joining would not require any kind of constitutional adjustment at all.
Some Americans think they can’t be in the Commonwealth ‘because they fought for their independence’. But all the members of the Commonwealth are entirely independent and many fought to become so, Kenya for example, so this argument makes no sense either.
The reality is:
The Commonwealth is open to any country which has had at any time either constitutional or administrative ties to at least one current member of the Commonwealth of Nations.
Traditionally, new Commonwealth members had ties to the United Kingdom. And considering we have invaded practically everywhere at some point most places do! Sorry Mongolia!
We were too busy drinking tea to invade the places in white.
.
Of course, as the USA has ties to the UK it would be eligible to join. Countries do have to be democracies with at least minimal respect for human rights (Fiji, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Zimbabwe have all been suspended at times for failing to do so).
I’ve been led to believe that the USA is a democracy with OK’ish human rights, so you’re good there too.
There are many other countries that could be part of the Commonwealth if they wanted to, including The Republic of Ireland, Israel, Egypt, Iraq, Afghanistan and numerous others – even France! And there are even two countries in the Commonwealth now that never actually had British ties: Rwanda and Mozambique.
So, the reason for not joining is just inertia and lack of ‘can do’ attitude.
Logical, but foolish, considering the list of grievances in the declaration of independence.
Again I must ask here, what is globalism but a unification of already established trade (commerce) unions (nations), a placing together of all labor pools (common populations) so as to form one giant labor/trade union, where everyone is identified digitally with Social Security numbers and other marks and branding of common beasts of burden?
One last note and reason on why the United States corporation is just a trade union…
Out here in legal hell (the district), we are stupid enough to hire an attorney (agent) from the BAR Association (part of the Executive Branch Dept. of Justice) for representation, which is a sign of incompetence in an admitted state of non compos mentis. But when the company does something bad to an employee that is a labor union member, the employee then files grievances through the organized power of the union that represents (as agent/attorney) that employee (in United States persona/status/mask). And so it is safe to say that the main reason for starting a trade union in the first place is because the employees have unheard or unanswered grievances outstanding and that nothing is being done with them by the corporation.
So how is this any different than when the colonists formed the Declaration of Independence and in doing so listed all of their own many grievances against the king of England as head of the Crown corporation?
I, for one, fail to see any substantial difference. They formed “a more perfect union”, one more “perfect” than what the Articles of Confederation (Conspiracy) entailed. In other words, the management employees of the Crown corporation formed a trade union for land and plantation holders, as a union of People (States/commonwealths). Since all unions of this sort, being called as nations, are under the law of nations, I don’t see how they are any different from any other trade union except in their “federal” capacity. Each has its own area of the globe to manage behind jurisdictional lines, and all international trade is done through corporate contract under admiralty/maritime law (law of the flag at sea).
What does the Coast Guard do?
NVDC – The National Vessel Documentation Center facilitates maritime commerce and the availability of financing while protecting economic privileges of United States citizens…
That’s what a union does, alrighty.
The coast guard practices maritime law enforcement. It does not protect the sea, it protects the commercial law of the sea. It protects international monopolies on commerce and prevents non-union members (i.e. illegal aliens) from entering the union to work.
It’s commerce and nothing but commerce!
The coast guard has not always been named the coast guard, of course. In fact, it has always been about commerce, or more accurately, revenue.
Perhaps you’ve notice this symbol on the US dollar:
–=–
Before it was renamed, the Department of Treasury of the United States was originally the Treasury of North America. Why? Because it was a Crown corporation holding for the geographical area known as North America.
Likewise, the coast guard has not always carried on under that name. It was originally the Revenue Cutter Service (from Wikipedia):
The United States Revenue Cutter Service was established by an act of Congress (1 Stat.175) on 4 August 1790 as the Revenue-Marine upon the recommendation of Secretary of the TreasuryAlexander Hamiltonto serve as an armed customs enforcement service. As time passed, the service gradually gained missions either voluntarily or by legislation, including those of a military nature. It was generally referred to as the Revenue-Marine until July 1894, when it was officially renamed the Revenue Cutter Service.
Revenue comes only from commerce. The logical fallacy then would be to assume that the job of the coast guard is to rescue and save lives, for that’s what every television propaganda piece shows. There’s certainly no coincidence that the term television commercials have the word commerce in them. They are advertisements for commerce. Thus one would expect to see the Revenue (customs) Cutter Service commercially advertised, while at the same time portraying it as if angels in whirlybirds will always be there to come to save us, heroes out to help the common folk. Nope. They are tax collectors and customs enforcers. They work for the Union. They ensure free-flowing commerce and the fees (customs) extorted therefrom. And yes, a small part of that happens to be search and rescue. And no, this is not an honorable job. It’s trafficking.
MERCHANT – One who is engaged in the purchase and sale of goods; a trafficer;a trader. A man who trades or carries on trade with foreign countries, or who exports and imports goods and sells them by wholesale. Webster. Merchants of this description are commonly known by the name of “shipping merchants.” (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
MERCENARIUS – Latin. A hireling or servant. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
MERCES – Latin. In the civil law, reward of labor in money or other things. As distinguished from “pemio,” it means the rent of farms, (prædia rustici.) (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
What is traffic? Part of transportation.
What is transportation? Part of commerce.
We just can’t win… for, since governments can only control commerce, they have turned everything we do (in person/legal status) into a commercial (legalized) act. And yes, that includes sexual reproduction and dropping the kids off at a government sanctioned school. To control the common population, every aspect of life must be recreated, renamed, and turned into a legal action. To accomplish this, we are all given legal (fictional) vessels of commerce, also called persons (status in society). Thus we are all put into commerce, which means we are all in competition. Our problem is not selfishness, for we are not acting as ourselves. We are acting as commercial vessels, as agents for our principal employer, the union government of the corporation of “United States.” No self, no selfishness. No, we suffer from the side effects of a money (evil) driven society in mammon. We suffer from greed. We suffer because we do not love on another. How can we if we don’t love or even use our True Selves?
–=–
In peace and war… In other words, in free-flowing international commerce (peace) and when commerce is blocked (war). We kill those who don’t like our system of commerce and its sanctioned rules, and we throw money at those who do. But that’s ok, we can always create more money. It, or rather, its value, doesn’t really exist. For what is evil (opposed to Nature/God) but that which is artificial, and what can be more evil than a respected lie?
This nation was created in commerce, and then recreated by civil war in commerce.
After the Coercive or “Intolerable” Acts were passed by the British Parliament, the colonies had a giant list of grievances, which were eventually enumerated in the Articles of Confederation (Conspiracy/Combination) and addressed in the constitution. Some examples of the grievances that were addressed in the constitution, so as to form what — a more perfect UNION — and ensuring that all states have representation in Congress, which sets taxes, are as follows:
Here are just some of the grievances solved by the forming of this new union of States under the articles of a confederation (conspiracy) and constitution.
Grievance #1 – Taxation without representation, while today we are over-taxed with representation
Grievance #2 – The King had absolute power, and now Congress has the reserved power to override Presidential veto
Grievance #3 – Colonists were not allowed to publicly speak out against or criticize the King (corporation), now addressed by the 1st Amendment, as “Freedom of Speech”
Grievance #4 – The Quartering Act (part of the Coercive Acts) forced colonist to house troops, now addressed by the 3rd Amendment, as “no quartering of troops”
Grievance #5 – The King allowed homes to be searched without warrants, now addressed in the constitution by the 4th Amendment, as “no unwarranted search and seizure”
Grievance #6 – There was no trial by jury of peers required, now addressed in the constitution by the 6th and 7th Amendments, as the “speedy and public trial by an impartial jury,” and the “right of trial by jury”
–=–
Well heck, this sounds like some of the grievances that might be found in any shitty job, doesn’t it? Don’t talk shit about the president or the middle management, don’t search my office and personal belongings without permission, don’t speak to me without my union representative being present, don’t overcrowd my office or cubicle… Just the typical and never-ending battle between management and employees.
And hey, has anyone even stopped to consider that the “Labor Party” is a political party in England? LOL! How much more obvious does it get?
Isn’t the democratic and republican party system in the United States just the laborers and tradesmen vs the corporate owners and managers?
The United States… It’s a trade union, dummy!
Still don’t believe it? Well then why don’t you go try and get a job without using your trade union identification card, your United States citizenship information, birth certificate, driver’s license, and social security number? Good luck, because most corporations won’t hire you without union affiliation, that is, United States federal ID. Why? Because the union (United States) requires it. A corporation cannot exist in the United States without agreeing to US law! Without it, you are just a scab.
Fortunately for us disenfranchised common scabs out here that don’t wish to participate in that unionized system of taxation, there is still the chance to be hired secretly, as an illegal worker, one not using United States union membership. We call this working under the table. And in doing so, we are no different than any other illegal alien out there. We are all scabs if we try to actually be Naturally Free. In fact, isn’t that what the mark of the beast will represent, a united union membership ID, while all non-marked men will be veritable scabs outside that monopoly of unions/nations unable to work, buy, sell, or TRADE?
Such is legal life on the unionized planet earth!
Before I sign off, there is one more word we must discuss. Most of you reading this will go back to your job tomorrow without conscious awareness of the routine, customary enslavement your employment represents. I understand perfectly this effect of cognitive dissonance mixed with the usual mouths to feed and bills to pay excuses. I get it. It’s a commercial trap. You cannot participate in commerce without allowing yourself to be used (employed) by that which enslaves you in its money system — a veritable company store called the economy. And the same old excuses will be used even as we watch nature unfold and the darkness of our collective employments in support of the big lie that is society is visible and undeniable. We will employ ourselves in our own demise and justify it any way we can, even as our children suffer the same and even worse effects. But hey, at least they won’t be hungry, and they can be entertained and babysat by affordable computers and “smart” phones while they get dumber and dumber, perfectly trained subjects to fill their parents shoes as useless eaters fulfilling mindless occupations that only contribute to the very structure that enslaves them! But I understand, we’ve all been entertained and educationally entrained that we are being brave, nurturing, and even responsible by working 8 hours a day and paying babysitters and the public school system to surrogate. Actually, this is the easy route, being an irresponsible parent in the unionized employment system. And ease is one of the grand old sins. Knock knock Neo, you’re in the legal, commercial matrix!
What is a job?
JOB – noun – [of unknown origin, but perhaps allied to chop, primarily to strike or drive.] 1. A piece of work; any thing to be done, whether of more or less importance. The carpenter or mason undertakes to build a house by the job. The erection of Westminster bridge was a heavy job; and it was a great job to erect Central wharf, in Boston. The mechanic has many small jobs on hand. 2.A lucrative business; an undertaking with a view to profit. No cheek is known to blush nor heart to throb, Save when they lose a question or a job. 3.A sudden stab with a pointed instrument. [This seems to be nearly the original sense.] To do the job for one, to kill him. – verb transitive – To strike or stab with a sharp instrument. 1.To drive in a sharp pointed instrument. –verb intransitive – To deal in the public stocks; to buy and sell as a broker. The judge shall job the bishop bite the town, and mighty dukes pack cards for half a crown.
SMART –noun – [This word is probably formed on the root of Latin amarus, bitter, that is, sharp.] 1. Quick, pungent, lively pain; a pricking local pain, as the pain from puncture by nettles; as the smart of bodily punishment. 2.Severe pungent pain of mind; pungent grief; as the smart of affliction. –verb intransitive – 1.To feel a lively pungent pain, particularly a pungent local pain from some piercing or irritating application. Thus Cayeene pepper applied to the tongue makes it smart. 2. To feel a pungent pain of mind; to feel sharp pain; as, to smart under sufferings. 3.To be punished; to bear penalties or the evil consequences of any thing.He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it. Proverbs 11:15. –adjective – 1. Pungent; pricking; causing a keen local pain; as a smart lash or stroke; a smart quality or taste…
–=–
Ah, so that’s why hitmen and contract killers get assigned a job.
Every business is a job to its intended customers. Why? Because every product out there is sold at interest, with profit and gain in mind. Every business is out to smart its customers, and for that matter, its employees with low pay and no share in the profits. The actual value matters not, only supply and demand. Corporations must make profit or they must die (figuratively). Thus, entire continents of people will be starved to death in order for corporations (artificial persons, including governments) to make money, the root of all evil. So what is your job? What part do you play in the jobbing of others? Can any of you reading this say with a clear conscious that your job doesn’t lead to stabbing everyone else in the back or taking advantage of anyone? What is your end product? What is your end service? What is the point to your employment? Would you do it without pay? In other words, what is it that you are allowing yourself to be used (employed) for in order to earn money as a corporate prostitute? Just asking…
We are all acting as surety for a United States person in our job, and we are all smarting each other because of it. One’s accumulated debt in college loans show how smart one actually is.
All this because the meaning of the words that enslave you and cause you to harm others are all but lost in translation.
But by all means, don’t let this distract you from all your smart technology. There’s a job to do.
So long, from a fellow dummy, just figuring it all out as I go…
.
–Clint > richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, June 13th, 2018
UPDATE: Note to my readers: This is a new post with the same title as my last one. That last unedited, incomplete version was posted accidentally by myself a few weeks ago without my realization. It should be as of today read again due to so much more background and information that has been added and now finished. For those that commented on the last post I apologize for those being lost. Sorry for the confusion, and please know that I consider this to be one of the most important blog essays I have put out to date. It really explains in detail all the pieces involved in our collective societal breakdown, with the intent to start the “New World Order” or world government we all hear about but can’t quite see how it has been constructed. This is the blueprint. I give it to you now.
–Clint, Friday, May 11th, 2018
–=–
–
–=–
“In order that all men may be taught to speak truth,
it is necessary that all likewise should learn to hear it.”
–Samuel Johnson
–=–
This will be my last entry with regards to The Great Pension Fund Hoax and all it entails. Quite frankly, there is nothing more to reveal. The gig is up. The endgame is apparent. Unless all current, un-retired members of all pension funds withdraw what they have voluntarily given (contributed) as the law allows before their actual retirement, and until taxpayers collectively stop allowing their local, state, and federal taxpayer dollars to be funneled away (as required municipal corporation pension contributions) so as to destroy any support in this global investment scheme with the goal of total, centrally organized control and corporate governance worldwide, there is no way to prevent what is and always was the intent of these pension schemes toward globalism and world government. The transference of wealth as the collective possession and ownership of the majority of corporate shareholder stock has now sufficiently been passed into collective, international government hands through these public investment schemes. I’ll waste no more time warning and calling upon deaf ears nor hopelessly believing that anyone will bite the corporate, governmental hand that feeds them. This is therefore my last ditch, last minute attempt to spell out in the greatest of detail and foundational understanding the whole plot of this international public pension ponzi scheme and why it is and has been the number one financial stone supporting this modern move to global governance. This is not just some empty statement to frighten you, though it should, but is merely a statement of known fact. The time for willful ignorance is over. For we must come to understand that through many decades of continuously taxpayer supported pension fund investments, governments around the world are the majority shareholders of nearly all corporations, with very few exceptions.
This doesn’t merely spell socialism or communism, but complete global corporate governance by the world’s governments acting collectively under the unified laws of private, non-governmental associations (NGO’s) and other private functionaries and sets of non-governmental law. These rules have already been put into place, and the financial reporting structures of governments by the CAFR system is in full effect. While the names change from nation to nation, the accounting structure for all governments and organizations, including pension funds, are now being set to a globalized standardization. Social Security is also now in over 140 countries, coordinated through the United Nations and World Bank by the International Social Security Association (ISSA). The full list of International Social Security Association member countries can be seen here: https://www.issa.int/en_GB/directories/organization. And yes, this does in fact mean that communist China has the same “Social Security” system as the United States, United Kingdom, and most other countries, and yes the system has been globalized to entrap all common people into a digital identity and complete dependence upon international investment pension schemes such as these. The goal:
—=—
16.9 – “By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration.”
—United Nations Sustainable Development 2030 Target Goal 16.9
—=—
“No community should be considered to be outside the span of this new agenda. Whatever your ethnicity, whatever your livelihood, whatever your lifestyle or location, all of you are inside the agenda. We need to inform everyone that these goals are the heart of a plan for the future of the worlds people, as well as for the planet itself… Peace and security, human rights and justice, and sustainable development, brought together within this 2030 agenda.”
—David Nabarro, Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General of the United Nations, from a speech on April 15th, 2016
—=—
World Bank:
“Overview: Providing legal identity for all (including birth registration) by 2030 is a target shared by the international community as part of the Sustainable Development Goals (target 16.9). The World Bank Group (WBG) has launched the Identification for Development (ID4D) cross-practice initiative to help our client countries achieve this goal and with the vision of making everyone count: ensure a unique legal identity and enable digital ID-based services to all.”
—United Nations 2030 Agenda, from a World Bank publication entitled, “Identification for Development”
—=—
For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape… so warns the Bible.
Birth certificates (the creation of legal persons/artificial identities) are printed on bank notes. The certificate assigned to myself is printed by “Midwest Bank Note Company.” You can look it up for yourself, though Midwest has now merged with Colonial Banknote Company, here: http://colonialbanknote.com
To understand why this is so, we must only look at the definition of this banking term of art. What is a certificate?
CERTIFICATE – Paper establishing anownership claim. (—Barron’s Dictionary of Banking Terms)
–=–
Why that’s what we do for our dogs and cats, isn’t it? We certify them through registration as property? We chip them with digital identity! But just who is establishing ownership of our vital statistics turned fictional persona (legal status)?
Perhaps you’ve never noticed that there is no line item on a birth certificate that establishes paternity rights or ownership of the child itself? This is not a form filled out by a parent to declare property of the child, but is a certified abandonment of the illegitimate child and paternal rights to the nation state by an “informant” as its ward, usually the mother, while witnessed and signed by “doctors” like former congressman Ron Paul. The birth certificate has nothing to do with the actual child, and is not attached to the child in any way until the parents invoke that legal entity that is created thereof, the person (status) of a United States citizenship. Once this use of the name, number, signature, and other benefits is utilized by the parents until the age of consent, the child is then brainwashed into believing he or she actually is that person, that status, that legal name, and that he or she is in fact identified by a pension number called Social Security like a marked beast of burden, like cattle. Once adulthood is reached, the infant carries on in that false, legal identity so as to function in the false, legal realm of interstate commerce controlled and policed by the United States and its agencies and municipal corporations. We cannot know any better because our parents didn’t know any better. We become volunteers under the strict legal matrix code without even realizing it, aging from 17 to 18 in an unnoticeable moment upon the artificial Roman calendric timeline, and we simply continue using the name and number (mark) of citizenship to the United States as if it were perfectly natural and morally correct. We are even taught to believe this to be the sign of freedom, even as they call us subjects, tenants, consumers, taxpayers, and customers. Out intention is made express by our action of using the status of US citizenship, signing in its name, and receiving its benefits and consumer protections. This is how we become agents, and potentially the enemy of everyone else. For in the legal realm, the law is competition, greed, and amorality. We exist therefore in complete opposition to Nature and Its Law, lost in the circular matrix of legal fiction. Hell, we are even tricked into praying for money (mammon)!
Of course the fictional persona (legal status) assigned from the vital statistics of each man (male or female) at birth is a creation of the United States (the principal) under its agency, and so of course a birth certificate must be established to both prove identity (fictional persona, legal sameness) and also claim original ownership upon that newly, artificially created entity of the legal fiction. The person (status) thus created at this birth certification process is like the car or shoe avatar on the monopoly board — we use it and are responsible for its credits, debts, titles, fees, and taxes. But in the end all the pieces and all the money (credit) go back in the box — back to the central bank (government). We are not the words (vital statistics) printed on these birth certificates, for words are form without substance, existing nowhere in Nature, purely the artful creations of man. Of course, no man of flesh and blood is born from a birth certificate, only a digital copy to be operated commercially in the legal, commercial matrix. Persons have no blood. Persons are not men, though men may choose to pretend to be bond and surety of persons. Insured commercial persons, not men, are then hired under flattering titles like bank teller, doctor, or fireman. Men cannot be hired in the United States without first possessing a fictional, legal identity (personhood) under bond and surety within the United States. No person, no contract. No person, no signature. And of course, on the inverse, with no contract the devil (legal fiction/artifice) has no power.
To be a hireling is not a good thing. We are all being used by devils in suits and ties and nothing else… but some of us get better rewards for it, say, like the illogical, unreasonable, completely artificial interest and gains (usury and engrossment) created in the purely fictional stock and bond “markets” from the investments in public pensions.
HIRE –verb transitive – 1.To procure from another person and for temporary use, at a certain price, or for a stipulated or reasonable equivalent; as, to hire a farm for a year; to hire a horse for a day; to hire money at legal interest. 2. To engage in service for a stipulated reward; to contract with for a compensation; as, to hire a servant for a year; to hirelaborers by the day or month. 3.To bribe; to engage in immoral or illegal service for a reward. To hire out one’s self, to let; to engage one’s service to another for a reward. They have hired out themselves for bread. 1 Samuel 2:5. To hire or to hire out, to let; to lease; to grant the temporary use of a thing for a compensation. He has hired out his house or his farm. – noun – 1.The price, reward or compensation paid or contracted to be given for the temporary use of any thing. 2.Wages; the reward or recompense paid for personal service.The laborer is worthy of his hire.Luke 10:7. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
PROSTITUTE – verb transitive – [Latin prostituo; pro and statuo, to set.] 1.To offer freely to a lewd use, or to indiscriminate lewdness. Do not prostitute thy daughter. Leviticus 19:29. 2.To give up to any vile or infamous purpose; to devote to any thing base; to sell to wickedness; as, to prostitute talents to the propagation of infidel principles, to prostitute the press to the publication of blasphemy. 3. To offer or expose upon vile terms or to unworthy persons. –adjective – Openly devoted to lewdness; sold to wickedness or to infamous purposes. Made bold by want and prostitute for bread.– noun – 1. A base hireling; a mercenary; one who offers himself to infamous employments for hire. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
–=–
You see, the word hire is not just defined as working for money, it is defined as the very form of money to be paid, be it wages or some other reward or compensation, as trading favors for favors. We are all prostitutes in this sense, and its time we stop denying it. Even the word soldier in its etymology comes from the name of a Roman coin, for a soldier of the nation is a mercenary that protects the corporate nation against the States (People) that created it, just as it was in the civil war. But I must also truthfully ask, though I doubt I’ll like the answer, just how many reading this would give up their legal (artificial) contracted “rights” to the rewards of Social Security payments or other public welfare like public pensions, including the standing armies of the United States and its completely corrupt Veterans Administration, despite the knowledge that it is literally the carrot on a stick leading us all into the very mark of the beast/global slave system forewarned about in the Revelation? To be a hireling is to work for mammon and the gods (magistrates) that create, credit, and administer it. This is a self-evident truth. We can deny it no longer.
After all, what is the one thing that defines a nation? It’s unique currency and the valuation of that currency internationally, of course. Government owns the money, owns the printing presses, owns the copyright, owns the central bank to which all others are subservient members, and it owns the ability to set the statutory value of that currency while controlling the markets that set the artificial, commercially driven “market” value. Governments are the only actual bank, the only actual source of money. All others are merely users of governments main product — money. And as we can see, each government uses its citizenry (persons) as the source of money creation. They call us collectively as human capital, the word capital coming from the Latin capita, meaning by the head. This is how a rancher counts his herd of cattle, by the head, within his own fences that create a capitalist society of captured and subservient cows. This is an excellent synonym for what is the typical public status of each US (national) citizenship.
But I work for the post office, you say… how can I possibly be considered a prostitute; a mercenary?
Don’t shoot the messenger. I am not judging anyone, lest I judge myself. I am merely defining terms as they are, not as I want them to be or falsely, patriotically believe they are or should be. We must learn to speak these truths about ourselves, about our own actions, and therefore we must first hear the truth without prejudice and with a neutral mindset. We must admit our own defeat and open-air internment before we can free ourselves. We must learn the language of the creators of fiction, of artifice, of lies, for only then may we protect ourselves from their artful terms. We must be sincere in all things, never allowing what is the Real thing to be fictionalized and thus legalized into the empty name or title of that thing, so we may be always in harmony with Nature, with self-existent Truth, with God, which are invariably the same words (meanings).
All “employees” of all corporations are hirelings, prostituting themselves as workers for hire (mercenaries). Remember, these are neutral terms, not meant to evoke emotion, only Truth. An employee is an agent of its principal, without exception. A public (national) citizen is an agent of its principal in franchise (legal freedom). Both exist to benefit the mother (creator of person/status) corporation. Another word for mother is matrix, an artificial womb offering false security and safety, but never Natural (True) Freedom. A citizenship of the United States is in prostitution to the United States, a foreigner to the 50 States holding no land (territory), always in modern, feudalistic tenancy by contract. One cannot be a national citizenship and also have perfect title to any land in any State. Why? Because anything registered in a United States person (name) is property thereby of the United States. The user (agent/employee) is never the allodial owner, and can therefore only hold anything (as registered property) through the legal name of its principal. The principal holds, the agent uses and pays taxes for that right to use. And this process of rebirthing men into persons of the United States is how the land was stolen from ourselves and our forefathers that were tricked into placing their legitimate children into an illegitimate national citizenship (wardship/apprenticeship). In total neutrality, as a definition of terms, this cannot be disputed. Emotion and personal opinion have no place in legality, nor in its language. There is no love, no devotion, no care, no charity, and no patriotism in the legal realm nor in its terms of art. It is strict and applied strictly. And most importantly, the constitution does not apply to or protect United States public citizenships (subjects), only private “People” in the several States. And so as a pensioner, you should know that there is no constitutional law that will protect your contributions (gifts) given when they start declaring municipal bankruptcy and start taking it away. You fell into a financial trap, and you must either live with the consequences or remove now what you have “contributed” while the corporate law of these organized criminals still allows it. That law can change tomorrow, as you tacitly agreed to when you started contributing.
And hey, by the way, government’s most important office is in fact the Post Office and System, for through that corporate structure its official summons, informations, and notices of corruptions like foreclosures are delivered to helpless victims of the very money and investment schemes we are speaking of now. The post office is like a court without a bar, where preliminary business can be conducted and contracts can be signed and delivered. It is where most people get bad news, where they are informed of their audits and seizures from the illegitimate (de facto) IRS, and where banks warrant and deliver their interest and fees (usury), a criminal activity made legal by man’s law and ultimately protected by the sheriff (executive branch of the state) as our homes and possessions are sold at auction in “sheriff’s sales” on behalf of these banks while we end up homeless on the streets… To protect commerce and serve summons.
But you are just a lowly post office worker, the automaton we interact with, right? No responsibility there, right?
If one thing has been stripped from our society it is indeed the ability to consider and self-actualize responsibility for our own actions, for just doing our “jobs” as mercenary prostitutes for hire, and for treating each other with respect and dignity. We pretend to be lowly even though we are like bolts holding the machine together and the fuel causing it all to operate. The legal system and its support and protection of mammon as its life-blood is the foundation of this curse. We are agents for government, be it in citizenship or in employment. All we do is in support of it and its global corporate investment schemes.
Ask yourself this question: Would you continue to do your current job if you were no longer paid to do it? Of course not. You do it only because you are paid, because that’s what prostitutes do. Charity is our Natural State of Being, and I am willing to bet that every single reader of this essay would seek a more charitable engagement if no money were involved so as to help other men rather than suffer another day at whatever one’s current, corporate job is tracking, using, selling, and all-around harming their customers per capita with a capitalist fake-smile and in the most inventive of propagandist comforts. Only through monetary compensation can we be made to work, labor, toil, and fix that which is against Nature and our own moral compass. We are as of late working for the AI, doing its bidding to make it stronger, mining its digital currency, and giving it all our personal, private information to share publicly and build upon our digital identity. But some of us tell ourselves and others how much we love our jobs as wage-slaves, perhaps the greatest self-deceit we’ve been programmed to endure. To this self-aggrandizing lie I call bullshit every time, and refer back to the original question. If you Truly love it, you’d do it for free, in love, charity, and good will. You don’t love the job, you love the money. And it is the love of money that is the root of all evil, the very lifeblood of mammon.
I didn’t say the Truth doesn’t hurt. But it really hurts for those living their own lies. Truth is the best medicine for all disease, especially the chronic liar and idolator.
One may not believe that working for the “state” is a lewd or vulgar use of one’s time and labor at all, and may find some agentic comfort or even some reprehensible sense of moral superiority by their temporarily granted, hireling flattering titles. The house-slave, after all, is quite content and even proud of his flattering title of slave status as long as he is the limited master of at least some of his fellow slaves. Ah, the idiocracy of that middle management cess pool…
The popular reputation of the typical DMV employee is certainly a sign of how such flattering titles in prostitution (employment) utterly destroy any notion of dignity, respect, and charity to ones fellow man. For these employees do not deal with men, they deal with men acting in persona (mask/status) seeking benefits they believe are rightful and even of God (Natural), and whom often are equal in their contempt for the DMV employee by nature of their own low but delusional worshiped status, that of a US citizenship. Slaves that believe they are free even as the stand in line to pay extortion fees and taxes to the DMV. LOL! Imagine if God exacted taxes for each breath of life and each blade of grass? Taxes and fees are self-evidently not a part of Nature, and DMV fees and charges certainly don’t come from heaven. Let us be clear — ONLY PERSONS CAN BE FORCED TO PAY TAXES. And this is why the scriptural Law teaches never to respect or act as a person (status) other than thyself. The reason for this highest and moral Law of Nature, again, is self-evident. For a person is never of a source in Nature. A person is always a creation of man, and men will always rule over persons, just as Nature and Its Law will always be Highest without exception. For without Nature and Its Law, there would be no men, and with no men, there would be no government, no lies, and no fictional (legal) law that opposes Nature and Its Law. This we call the Law or Word of God, not because some anthropomorphized version of religious art supposing the form of God spoke these words, but because God (Jehovah) is actually defined as “God is Truth.” Whatever is spoken by any man that is self-evident Truth of Existence in Nature, in the Universe, and not the concepts of man, is speaking the Word of God. The metaphor cannot be mistaken as literalism, lest the Truth be lost as it is today behind kings, popes, and presidents (false gods).
–=–
“Of a truth, God will not do wickedly, and the Almighty will not pervert justice.”
–Job 34:12
–=–
To avoid wrath, live in Truth, never acting against Nature and Its Law. How simple can it be?
Nature and Its Law is the only Truth. Nature is the epitome of neutrality. It is not good and it is not evil, which are only the conceptions of man. It is Existence. It just Is, as I AM. I Exist without words, without names, without numbers. And this is how God (Jehovah – Lord in English, JHVH in Hebrew, Deus in Latin and Portuguese, etc.) is defined, as a verb of All Being that is the Universe, all of self-existence, and most importantly all that is not an artificial creation of man. If only this aspect of what is God is understood, then the Law of Nature can be almost completely understood. Art (artifice) and Reality are never the same, and always oppose one another even in their simulation. Likewise, the legal name, title, number, and identity of everything in Nature is a creation of man, recreated solely for the intent to control all of Nature and Its Creation (man and other Creatures, etc.) outside of the Law of Nature, to pull everything away from its Source. The demonization of the Bible was the most important step in this process, for the Bible is provably the very foundation of the “unwritten” common law system, where to break that Law of Nature as total self-governance and total charity and forgiveness to others is to enter into the legal matrix system and its false code (law). To obfuscate and replace the Bible Law, they created corporate (organized) religions and caused the public minded commoners to believe that the Bible is religion, not the Law of Nature. And it worked like a charm… literally. The Truth was hidden behind priests and judges in long robes, and religions were thus incorporated under the state, despite the fact that the Bible Law is to be under or replaced by no other doctrine (law of men). And so, as we will discover, moral action against immoral legalism was made illegal. The church and state are inseparable.
All we need to do is to go back to the Truth. This is another way of saying back to God. Sadly, no matter how well I explain this, many will have stopped reading this at the mere mention of these words Bible and God, which is proof positive of how conditioned we all are to remain as the low, vulgar beasts of burden we are currently acting as — consumers akin to a swarm of insatiable locusts, a cancerous growth that denies itself any remedy that might interfere with its pointless, unspiritual growth. We are killing ourselves surely but slowly, and all because we refuse to accept and Live in and as part of the Truth (God). Jehovah (JHVH) is a verb, not a person, place, or thing (noun). And in our Natural State of Being, so too are we nameless and pure and therefore immune from man’s law of legal fiction. For the laws of men only rule over the persons, places, and things (nouns) that man creates, which are always fiction. There are no words in Nature. And this is the ultimate of occulted knowledge. Without words, men are as helpless as animals. For without words men are neutered, having True Born equality in Nature. Only respected names and titles (nouns, as persons places and things) can cause inequity, which is why they are strictly forbidden under the Law of Nature, for without words, there can be no contracts, the tool of the devils (evil geniuses) that men have become. This, again, is self-evident.
Our sole problem is that everything we do, everything we work for, everything we strive to achieve or manifest, is valued in money. We live for the lie that is valuation, in the god of mammon we trust. This wicked disease is so simple to cure, and yet the cure has been made so elusive to us by those who keep us in the darkness of legalism and valuation (mammon). The cure is simply Truth. Life without fiction and lies, which can only be accomplished by total self-government by all men upon themselves. This is the Law. And all governments recognize this fact, which is why they do everything to keep us regulated and sedated from the Truth, from the Bible as Law (not religion), and from a self-governing mentality.
—=—
“It is impossible to enslave, mentally or socially, a bible-reading people. The principles of the bible are the groundwork of human freedom.”
—Horace Greeley, founding editor of ‘The New-Yorker’ and ‘New York Tribune’ newspapers
–=–
“Today, not only in philosophy but in politics, government,
and individual morality, our generation sees solutions in terms of synthesis and not absolutes.
When this happens, truth, as people have always thought of truth, has died.”
— Francis Schaeffer
–=–
“I believe that in the end the truth will conquer.”
–John Wycliffe
–=–
“Let us rejoice in the truth, wherever we find its lamp burning.”
–Albert Schweitzer
–=–
“Never let us be guilty of sacrificing any portion of truth on the altar of peace.”
–J. C. Ryle
–=–
“As a matter of honor, one man owes it to another to manifest the truth.”
–Thomas Aquinas
–=–
To suggest that Truth will prevail or conquer is almost immature or self-evident, for of course nature will continue long after the lies, fictions, and arts of men die. Truth (Nature, the Universe) is the permanent foundation of all things, even lies and liars, while man’s inventions therein are always temporary. So yes, it is a 100% safe bet to say that Truth will conquer. For no lie can exist without the very Truth it pretends and emulates in darkness. What is a lie without some Truth to harm or obfuscate? Truth is, of course, the very Real source of every lie. What lie can exist without some Truth to defy? What would be the point? Truth (God) will prevail. The Universe (God) will continue unending. And unfortunately, that means with or without us. It is our own power of choice by the gift (or curse) of free will that shall ultimately decide our own fate. And most, even the self-proclaimed, flatteringly titled “atheists” will ironically blame God instead of themselves for the consequences of the choices they individually and collectively made, while the Christians will in turn blame the Atheists (absence of God), even though they never followed the Law of God themselves, lost in their false (flattering) title and idolatry, never acting “christian” in any way and thus offering no example that the atheist would seek to emulate. But what is God by definition but the Nature of the Universe Itself in a state of reclamation, reclaiming that which stands opposed and in disharmony with Its structure and Law?
Unless we choose to always speak in what is called as the Word of God, which is nothing more than the Pure and self-evident (not man-made) Truth of all things at all times, and unless we act only upon that Word as Truth, then not only our fictional creations but also ourselves shall perish from this Earth. Some would call this God’s wrath, but It’s really just Nature taking its reasonable course, like the body’s immune system fights an infections disease. To impose a pretended “religious” conscious and intent to Nature (God) is only useful for the blame game, for blaming God when we each are the problem together. Call it what you will… the Truth will remain as hopefully will that remnant of the meek Living in It as inheritors.
To manifest the Truth is to manifest the example of a man following God’s Law, which is of course Jesus the Christos (anointed). This, again, is not religion. It simply means that the “return of christ” will happen when men start acting christ-like. This is the True message of the Bible hidden from us. And so, as soon as we begin manifesting the Truth and Its Law through our own responsible actions, we shall be witness to the return of the Son (Law/Word) of God. Thus, the Bible instructs us to become the “sons of God” as well, meaning that we should follow the example and heed the Law of Truth (God). You see, eventually one realizes that all of these terms are defined as the same thing, the same concept. God is Truth (the Universe), Jesus is Truth manifested as a man following the Word/Law of God, and so man is to become each and every one a son of God as well, by emulating the example, not by worshiping it as an idol as the corporate church does. The story of God’s Law personified through Jesus Christ’s example doesn’t seek fans, but followers. This, again, is self-evident. To follow Christ is to Follow the Law (Son/Word) of God. It’s not rocket science, and it aint even religion. Just common, Natural sense. Religion is nothing but incorporated idolatry; a big, multi-cultural, inter-denominational, membership only fan club for sinners. The Bible is Law. Its followers are sons of God, True and self-governing Christians.
All of this is explained and detailed from the lexicons and concordances and Bible dictionaries in my book, Strawman: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person. Please download it for free, here.
Now, let us examine this agentic delusion more closely so that we may understand the nature of pension payments as a reward for our prostitution to the legal, corporate, de facto (illegitimate) state…
A cop, for instance, may believe he or she is acting lawfully while at the same time exacting his fellow citizens through tickets, though this is obviously an extortion and unlawful summons to appear. One may even state that, well, my department is good compared to the others, as if government is not a complete and whole entity, and as if working for the part is not prostitution of ones self for the well-being of the whole.
A checkout employee at the local grocery store may believe he is acting lawfully, morally, merely doing the simple job description he is paid for. He or she may even do it with a smile, with “service” above and beyond his employee handbook, getting his picture on the wall of shame as employee of the month. Imagine that: prostitute of the month… Little does he or she contemplate that in fact every action taken and every hour worked on behalf of that “grocery” store or other “retail” story was once a crime against all people, before it was made a protected criminal activity by government license. The word retail is a feudalistic term, of course, referring to the profits of landlords over their vassals. But what exactly is a grocer, just what is this modern form of retail sales, and most importantly, why do we accept it as completely normal, reasonable, customary, and even lawful?
GROSS – Great; culpable. General. Absolute. A thing in gross exists in its own right, and not as an appendage to another thing.
GROCER – In old English law, a merchant or trader who engrossed all vendible merchandise; an engrosser. See Engrosser. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
ENGROSSER – One who engrosses or writes on parchment in a large, fair hand. One who purchases large quantities of any commodity in order to acquire a monopoly, and to sell them again at high prices.(–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
ENGROSS – To copy the rude draft of an instrument in a fair, large hand. To write out, in a large, fair hand, on parchment. In old criminal law. To buy up so much of a commodity on the market as to obtain a monopoly and sell again at a forced price.(–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
ENGROSSING – In English law. The getting in to one’s possession, or buying up, large quantities of corn, or other dead victuals, with intent to sell them again. The total engrossing of any other commodity, with intent to sell it at an unreasonable price. This was a misdemeanor,punishable by fine and imprisonment. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
HIGHWAY ROBBERY – Theft taking place on a public road. Slang fora transaction where one party has such leverage over the other and can demand such a high price so that it is akin to a robbery taking place.(–Black’s Law Dictionary, 2th Edition)
–=–
This certainly gives new perspective to our “friendly neighborhood grocer” now doesn’t it? America: the land of engrossment. What a gross situation, literally!
It actually makes some sort of vile, reprobate logical sense to us in our entrained, educated, entertained public-mindedness to sell or buy something at more than its actual value. It’s built into the economy. It is, in fact, custom. But even “customs” have been made into a taxable, commercial, legal thing – the customs house. Yes, they found a way even to tax customs, for today, all of our customs (even Christmas) are valued in the usury of mammon! Yet this action of engrossment is perhaps the single source of all our problems! Simply stated, engrossment is the opposite of charity, and charity is one of the Highest of all the Laws of Nature. Engrossment only exists where some form of money (mammon) exists. And in truth, the same thing can be said about needless suffering, poverty, and inequity, which cannot exist without such gross behavior and custom. Even more to the point, the flattery of titles of nobility are as well pointless without the control and hoarding from others (engrossing) of the money supply, whatever it is that is called as money. In other words, without money, there is no purpose for a de facto (illegitimate) government as the “United States” corporation and its district as a monopoly. For money is in fact a non-governmental tool, meaning not a de jure (lawful/legitimate) reason for the existence of any government, especially one claiming the God of the Bible as its excuse for existing!
What was once considered the public crime of engrossing is now made legal (licensed) in corporations that government holds significant or controlling shares of stock in through its pensions and other investment schemes… does this not ring of a conflict of interest to your ears? And not just a mere conflict of interest, but the ultimate one.
The point here is that whatever we do as an employee (agent) of this government-owned and regulated corporate structure, we have been entrained to overlook or to be completely ignorant of the harm we all do and the pain we continuously cause to each other. The “economy” thrives on this societal ignorance of greed, usury, engrossment, and extortion (exaction) toward each other. We literally call it customer service as we rape each other. And government calls us not as taxpayers but as customers, because most of what municipal governments do nowadays is labeled in the CAFR (audit) as non-governmental, for profit commerce, from golf courses to water and sewer districts. And even the most pointless or seemingly harmless and redundant jobs we partake in cannot be excused morally just because we are not CEO’s or Boards of Directors or even managers of the collective corporations we agree to prostitute ourselves to. They could not exist without us grunts, which is why they are pushing to replace us with AI and robotic labor, with self-checkouts and self-paying tickets, with a cashless world society where all men are required to have the mark of digital identity to even purchase or be in possession of a smart-dusted loaf of bread. The harsh reality is that we (the public) are doing this to ourselves, for not one part of this global system could be implemented and carried on without the base hireling at the ground floor selling, fixing, maintaining, servicing, and assimilating us into that which we are prostituting ourselves in mammon (money) to support. It just our jobs. We are paid to screw each other in every way possible, ignoring in every respect the scriptural, moral law that opposes it.
But I digress…
Only persons (legal status) are borne from such a certificate. That we choose to carry that legal identity (sameness) throughout childhood and into adulthood (legalized adultery) is voluntary (avoidable). But the use of that birthed, certified legal identity (name, title, number, mark, signature, etc.), as the property of government, causes us to act in agency under a contractual relationship with government, as virtual employees, and thus to act in accordance and under the administration of its laws. The creator (principal) controls its creation (agent). The user of a creation stands always subservient to its creator. Thus the avoidable use becomes an unavoidable debt, called a performance debt because the user must perform by the law of the person he or she uses. Enforcement of that legal system and law of persons is thus authorized by the volunteer, just as anyone that joins the military as a volunteer agrees to the violent and mental oppression that will be delivered after volunteering (contracting). And this concept is the cause of all our problems, for pension funds are created by government, not us. We are mere users and taxpayers. Of course, one only can be made to pay taxes when one uses that which belongs to another. In the end, all that we do as common US citizens is in persona, in the property of government, which means that in Reality (Nature) we own nothing. What is done or purchased in person belongs to government, for the person is certified by government as property. This is how everything was stolen from us — by tricking us all into acting as that which we are not, as a fictional person of (belonging to) the “United Sates” corporation. We are as art; cartoon characters controlled by the hand of legal artists, for a person is made of words and can only exist by words. Persons exist and have artificial life only in legal jurisdictions, the equivalent of an imaginary cartoon realm. It is in this imaginary, fictional legal realm that all money and property exist as well, for there is no such things as these in Nature.
Don’t believe it? LOL! Whose name is your home registered in? Your automobile? Your children?
When you work as an employee, do you think you own the title you use, or is it an agency (property) and office of the corporation (principal) that hired you?
Simply put, if you don’t own your public, legal name (status), which of course you Lawfully cannot, then you don’t own anything purchased or registered as property in that name either. To register a car in that certified (state-owned) birth name and number (legal identity) in exchange for an empty certificate of title is to claim ownership of that vehicle in a person (status in agency) owned by the United States (principal). Likewise, to contribute to a pension fund, being a taxpayer or pensioner, is to do so while acting as and in the property (persona) of the United States. As a man (male or female), you have no right to that which was contributed in the person (property) of another, any more than an employee can claim ownership of an employers product or property. This will become more clear as we progress, but should be at least basically understood here so as to comprehend the complete picture of how and why these pension funds were set up for “public” purposes. What is public is property of government, to be used and enjoyed by its proprietary citizens but never owned by its citizens. Citizens are public, are property, for citizens are fictional persons created and certified by the United States. What is public is never property of any one person, but of the principal that offers it in contract. Citizenship is a contractual relationship offered and accepted. Our use of the signature in the persona (status) is prima facie proof of our individual consent to the law of persons.
The title “pensioner” is as well property of the state, as is the title and office that employs the federal, legal persona you voluntarily use. And guess what? The state would not hire you without a legal persona it can control and extort taxation from! For every person of the United States is required to pledge allegiance to it and its constitution, its law, and all its de facto (illegitimate) corporate structure. Of course, this allegiance is not a choice, but a character built into the person (status). A man that accepts and uses this status (person) is presumed to understand all of this, though most stand as merely unaware users that never question or bite the feeding hand of their chosen legal masters (false gods).
When we speak of this term “government” in its present, de facto (illegitimate) form we are not speaking of those traditional institutions romanticized from history, but the current corporate, public structure under uniform commercial rules in the administration of international and interstate commerce and trade. We are talking about the universal incorporation of all the world’s corporations under one body politic, controlled by an internationally assembled, unelected, governing body of private, non-governmental associations. E Pluribus Unum… out of many one. For corporations are persons too, remember?
Look at any board of directors today, and you will find nothing less than the representatives of corporations and corporate interests. But it’s how these corporate executives arrive in such positions of authority, as electing board members, that we must come to understand. For if government is the main shareholder of any corporation, and shareholders vote to elect by proxy shareholder voting rules the board members of all the corporations they hold stock for in pension and other investment funds, then government is by default the major holder and thus collective electorate of all boards of directors of all stock-owned corporations in the world. Its really simple math, though with a globalist twist…
If you own votable corporate stock, you get a vote. Done.
As simple as this seems, this is the very heart of globalism, basically defined. And only through these pension fund schemes could this total control and collection of corporate stock have been pulled off. Why? First, they tricked us all into voluntarily contributing to their globalist investment goal, which is the most brilliant deceit imaginable. So there is no illegality here. We let it happen without a whimper. Secondly, they prevented each of us from investing on our own in good conscious, in moral causes or charities, or even in good companies run by good and moral men, in effect causing us to trust them to invest for us, on our behalf. This is called a legal trust, not to be confused with Trust (faith) in God. All legal words are opposite to their Natural counterparts.
They stole our choice with our expressed, contributing consent, and in turn invested in the worst of the worst corporations and elitist investment groups, those that most of us would protest against and hate if we cared to examine them close enough. Today, we continue to let this happen, and now the endgame is apparent. Global corporate governance is key to governance of all economies and social structures. For to control the entire commercial structure of the world is to control the harvesting, resource management, manufacturing, wholesale, resale, price-fixing, and the power of monopoly creation and trust building. For when the lawmaker, the regulator, is also the corporate owner bound by that law, then in effect there is no Real law or regulation, only a global system of organized (legalized) crime through extortion, exaction, engrossment, taxation, and usury. This we call as “government.” And as main shareholder, government’s main purpose is by government law to make a profit for each corporation’s shareholders, which again is mostly government. I can think of no worse situation to be in than this, for laws will be passed to ensure corporate health and welfare (profit) over consumer health (Nature) every time. This is indeed a crisis of unimaginable proportions. But we must remember that government is in control of corporations, never the other way around. The total power and authority lies with government in every way.
Now, when you hear shock-jocks and news outlets make claims that “government is owned by corporations,” you may understand that this is so far from the provable facts that it is laughable. However, you also must realize that it is in the best interest of both corporations and government to let such lies be as prevalent and apparently true and accepted as they are. The fact is, corporations cannot own government, because government has no ownership stock. This, again, is a self-evident Truth. The synthesis of government and corporations, on the other hand, is very concerning, to the point that to be a politician (regulator) is not much different that being a general board member on all corporations. For the regulator is the owner of that which it regulates, meaning that the regulator is bound by law to ensure profitability to each corporation, and thus may not pass laws to cause unprofitability.
So… do you now comprehend why oil spills aren’t cleaned up, why government doesn’t force oil companies to go broke in cleaning up their messes, or why pharmaceuticals are allowed to charge 300,000% markups on drugs that often maim or kill those that take them? This is the very nature of the global, corporate governance world we are allowing to be built all around us.
What is somehow not well-known publicly, though it appears fairly obvious, is that all governments from the district, city, county, state, and federal level are also municipal or other corporations. Artificial persons. Thus, I named my first documentary and website as The Corporation Nation. If this is hard to believe, just look at your city, county, or state seal:
–=–
–=–
Why is this important? Consider this… when under a corporation, one is not self-governing but instead under a contract to perform under strict (contract) law. There is no room for moral diversion or disobedience in a contractual performance debt such as citizenship. The maxims of law state clearly and without confusion that the contract makes the law. That’s why the allegory of the devil is said to be powerless over men without a contract, for in no other way may the devil turn good men away from the protections of God’s Law. In other words, while you are made to believe that you are under the constitutional and common law systems through entertainment and public education, you are in actuality under the public laws of municipal corporations governed by the state in interstate commerce, not the constitutions or so-called “law of the land,” as they say, which is just a romantic term for due process of law. These are, in other words, creations of government, illegitimate corporations created by government, not the legitimate governmental (constitutional) institution itself. Ignorance of this fact is key. A municep or provincial citizen was of course the name of a common Roman without respected higher status. As synonyms for what a provincial or municep is we find peasant, rustic, one-horse,unsophisticated, hick, jerkwater, and bumpkin. You may wear a suit to work as well, but you are no less unsophisticated in your status than anyone else, just a bit more brain-washable and controllable. You may seek to emulate and follow the corrupt example of your false, legal, corporate gods by dressing like them, because you seek to be like them, to earn their income and share in their pensions and bonuses, but to do this you certainly must leave Jesus in the dust of any righteous path.
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – A public corporation, created by government for political purposes, and having subordinate and local powers of legislation. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
MUNICIPAL FUNCTION – One created or granted for the special benefit and advantage of the urban community embraced within the corporate boundaries. Sometimes called a private function, as distinguished from a public or governmental function, which is one conferred or imposed on the municipality as a local agency of limited and prescribed jurisdiction to be employed in administering the affairs of the state, and promoting the public welfare generally. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS – A term referring to the internal business affairs of a municipality. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
CORPORATE LEGAL INDIVIDUAL – Municipal corporation possesses two kinds of power, governmental and public, and proprietary and private, and in exercise of former, corporation is a “municipal government,” while as to latter, it is a“corporate legal individual.”(–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
POLITICAL CORPORATION – A public or municipal corporation; one created for political purposes, and having for its object the administration of governmental powers of a subordinate or local nature. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
ENFRANCHISE – To make free; to incorporate a man in a society or body politic.
DISSOLUTION (Of Corporations) – The dissolution of a corporation is the termination of its existence as a body politic. This may take place in several ways; as by act of the legislature, where that is constitutional; by surrender or forfeiture of its charter; by expiration of its charter by lapse of time; by proceedings for winding it up under the law; by loss of all its members or their reductian below the statutory limit….
GUILDHALL – The hall or place of meeting of a guild, or gild. The place of meeting of a municipal corporation. The mercantile or commercial gilds of the Saxons are supposed to have given rise to the present municipal corporations of England, whose place of meeting is still called the “Guildhall.” (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
GUILD – A voluntary association of personspursuing the same trade, art, profession, or business, such as printers, goldsmiths, wool merchants, etc, united under a distinct organization of their own, analogous to that of a corporation,regulating the affairs of their trade or business by their own laws and rules, and aiming, by co-operation and organization, to protect and promote the interests of their common vocation. In medieval history these fraternities or guilds played an important part in the government of some states; as at Florence, in the thirteenth and following centuries, where they chose the council of government of the city. The word is said to be derived from the Anglo-Saxon ”gild” or “geld,”a tax or tribute, because each member of the society was required to pay a tax towards its support. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
Not a government, but a voluntary guild for commerce (federal and state business, enterprise), a municipal corporation granted subservient administrative powers…
But wait, government isn’t a corporation, it’s a body politic, isn’t it? How much clearer can it get, man? Did you miss the definition above as to how a body politic (corporation) dissolved?
The question you should be asking is, how did I become a member of my local municipal body politic (corporation)? How the hell did that happen? And the answer, again, is that you are not. Your assigned legal identity (persona) is. And because of that, you (the user but not owner of that person/status) must follow the laws of membership in bond and surety to it. For together, we all constitute an artificial person in law, called a body politic. Congratulations on your unwitting collaboration with this very tricky legal system. And every bad thing that municipal corporation does is in mine and your name, every war and illegal occupation done in our name as one body politic with only one voice, out of many one, E Pluribus Unum.
Yes, corporations are persons too. So don’t feel very special about being an “individual” person. Many natural or individual persons make up a single artificial person but with little or no individual responsibility for the corporations actions or harms. An artificial person (corporation, association, etc.) is never made of only one natural person, except as a corporation sole such as the corporations of the Queen of England and the United Kingdom, the Pope, and the Mormon “corporation of the president.” All of us are just the taxpaying tributes of the municipalities, no different that those of Caesar’s realm. Anything goes and any Law of Nature can be pretended to be broken here in legal land. Where else can men pretend to have limited liability for the damages they cause other men while pretending to be protected behind a corporate name and persona (mask), LLC? Where can doctors practice really bad medicine freely and without consequence unless they have limited liability through the malpractice insurance of a corporation (person) that represents them, allowing those doctors and their fleet of vaccine wielding nurses to harm and kill without consequence or even censure? And where can priests molest freely their trusted non-consenting, underage membership without the corporate protection and veil of the artifice of legal church sanctity? The priest is only one part of the corporation, after all, not the whole. We shouldn’t blame the whole person (corporation) for the actions of just one individual, or at least that’s the bullshit we are taught to accept because its supposedly a sacred institution. LOL!
–=–
“I prayed for a bicycle until I realized God doesn’t work that way.
So, I stole a bicycle and then prayed for forgiveness.”
–Emo Philips
–=–
What is a government issued license? Permission to and forgiveness of committing a crime.
Though the difference here between legitimate and illegitimate governmental structures may seem subtle, I assure you that this is the difference between having that now dead American dream of self-governing Liberty under God, and basic, feudalistic serfdom. But oh, to put this into comprehendible terms… What government creates (e.g. independent municipal corporations and religious corporations) are automatically subordinate, beneath, and therefore subject to that creator (source) government and its false, legal (anti-God) law. Thus the magistrates of governments throughout history have been labeled as “gods,” having nothing to do with religion and everything to do with undue authority. The word god, in fact, is a generic term, used often in law, the Bible, and in history to describe men with higher legal standing and with illegitimate power or authority, as kings, popes, judges, governors, etc. This is general knowledge, though perhaps not commonly known, which well be discussed and qualified (proven) further as we progress.
The same rule of language and Law is to be said about Nature, as all that is not man-made, being a “Creation” of God. Insurance policies, for instance, may or may not pay for an “Act of God,” meaning any Natural disaster or what is not caused by the agency and interference of man. This stands as absolute proof that government recognizes a higher power than man, and thus a higher and more authoritative Law of Nature. This provable fact is all we need to know for our purposes, that this Higher Law and its God cannot be defeated. Unfortunately, most common men have lost this knowledge and understanding to modern religious institutionalism and false doctrines (laws). Here the maxim of law states simply that the creator controls. Thus, to be under such a subordinate municipal corporation (city, county, state, district, etc.) created by the already (legally) existing government, which all municipalities (cities, counties, etc.) are, the public US citizen-ship is automatically and from the beginning so subjected as indirectly governed municeps under that municipal, independent, districted corporation. This common, public status is to be under and subject to that government, not to be the creator and power over government. To be under a municipal government is to be or carry a public status, not private. It is voluntary servitude to the false gods (magistrates) of government.
In a nutshell, this equates to the doctrine and law of agency. Just as an employee is an agent for his or her principal employer, so too is a municipal corporation (city, county, state, etc.) an agent for the principal government that created it. To be under the agent is to be under the principal and law of that agent. For more on agency, check out my book free @ StrawmanStory.info.
And so a pension fund member, for instance, is completely subservient to that fund and its management over its own affairs, just as every other public citizenship has no control over the Social Security Fund most contribute to. When government is higher in status than the people (acting as persons) it governs, then only tyranny and corruption can take hold. A free, self-governing man is foreign (private) to any and all governments, not under their public law but in standing as the private creator of it. We call these “the People,” or in other words, the private States (People) united, which are each foreign (private) to the corporation nation called “United States.” For detailed info on this subject, please get a copy of my book at the link just provided.
—=—
“A thing is private which is not common.”
—RES PROPRIA EST QUAE COMMUNIS NON EST. Le Breton v. Miles, 8 Paige (N.Y.) 261, 270. (Black4)
—=—
“A ‘US Citizen’ upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in ‘interstate commerce,‘as a ‘resident‘ does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.”
–Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)
–=–
“The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.”
–U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
–=–
The Importance of the Birth Certificate – Birth Registrar Certification
Do you know the purpose of a birth certificate?
“The legal portion of the birth certificate shows the child’s name, date of birth, and parents’ names, among other things. It establishes Texas RESIDENCY and US CITIZENSHIP.It provides legal identity. A birth certificate is required for Social Security, Medicaid, school enrollment, driver’s license, social services such as a marriage license, and more. In addition, it serves as proof of relationship to parents, which is required for child support services, inheritance, and eligibility for benefits…”
“The governments of the United States and of each of the several States are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other…”
—Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404 at 429
–=–
“The distinction between citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a State is clearly recognized and established. Not only may a man be a citizen of the United States without being a citizen of a State, but an important element is necessary to convert the former into the latter. He must reside within the State to make him a citizen of it, but it is only necessary that he should be born or naturalized in the United States to be a citizen of the Union.”
—Mr. Justice Miller, 16 Wall. 83 U. S. 72, in treating of the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as quoted in United States v. Wong Kim Ark 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
–=–
I could go on and on, but the story is told in just these few official quotes. The birth certificate establishes residency, not citizenship, in the State. It establishes citizenship (domicile) in the Nation, the district of the United States de facto corporation structure and jurisdiction, but not in the State. In other words, to be born in that which is called the United States jurisdiction is to be born in a place (jurisdiction/district) foreign to whatever State (People) inhabits that territory. There is no land in the United States, in the public, just like on the monopoly board, and we go round and round without ever touching any land of our own. US citizenships are foreigners in all 50 States.
Another word for private is foreign. In short, to be common is to be non-private; to be a property of another. To be a common citizen of the United States is to belong (as property) to the United States. To be common is to be public property. There is no Real privacy, only that which is revokable as granted by the authority of the legal gods (creators) of these strawmen, these public persons (legal statuses). And this means one very important thing… all common US citizens are foreigners to the State in which they reside. This is why US “federal” law always trumps state law regarding public, common persons (status). All of the several States are also by law foreign (private) to each other. The “United States” in Washington DC is as well private (foreign) to all 50 States. In this way the federal states’ (municipal) worker public pension scheme we are exposing here can be executed without a hitch. Foreigners have no protected rights in states, and it is in fact illegal for a state to interfere with the forced rights and laws governing US citizens (as properties of the United States corporation). These common rights are not a good thing — not the God-given or Natural Rights of man we believe them to be. The rights of the legal fictions (natural persons) we call as public citizenships are not optional, are forced and enforced at gunpoint, and exist only in the status (persona), never the man. The private (foreign) States cannot protect US citizens against the very fraud being conducted by the federal areas known as “states” and municipal governments thereof. To deny a US citizenship its required and enforced rights per that legal US status would be to break the US constitution and federal law. Protection is an illusion, as is peace and safety (security). Its a well-laid legal trap, a cold comfort based on status (legal personhood), and we have all been caught up in it. Pensioners, however, get an extra bonus, a retirement (death) retainer to keep them quite and numb despite their equal status with all the other common citizenry. They are paid off as prostituting state hirelings to betray their country, to destroy the posterity of their own people in favor of the federal (global) state government and its corporate, de facto municipal structure. And yet it seems that most have no idea they are doing so, standing instead within the arrogance of ignorance caused by public education and entertainment, exactly what we should expect from the common, vulgar class that we have allowed ourselves to become. They’re just doing their jobs, as we say, and as if that slave mentality is some legitimate excuse for total irresponsibility of our actions while employed (in agency).
COMMON – adjective – 1. Belonging equally to more than one, or to many indefinitely; as, life and sense are common to man and beast; the common privileges of citizens; the common wants of men. 2. Belonging to the public; having no separate owner. The right to a highway is common 3. General; serving for the use of all; as the common prayer. 4. Universal; belonging to all; as, the earth is said to be the common mother of mankind. 5. Public; general; frequent; as common report. 6. Usual; ordinary; as the common operations of nature; the common forms of conveyance; the common rules of civility. 7. Of no rank or superior excellence; ordinary. Applied to men, it signifies, not noble, not distinguished by noble descent, or not distinguished by office, character or talents; as a common man; a common soldier. Applied to things, it signifies, not distinguished by excellence or superiority; as a common essay; a common exertion. It however is not generally equivalent to mean, which expresses something lower in rank or estimation. 8. Prostitute; lewd; as a common woman… Common in gross or at large, is annexed to a man’s person,being granted to him and his heirs by deed; or it may be claimed by prescriptive right, as by a parson of a church or other corporation sole. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the American Language)
COMMONS – The class of subjects in Great Britain exclusive of the royal family and the nobility. They are represented in parliament by the house of commons. Part of the demesne land of a manor, (or land the property of which was in the lord), which, being uncultivated, was termed the “lord’s waste,” and served for public roads and for common of pasture to the lord and his tenants. Squares; pleasure grounds and spaces or open places for public use or public recreation owned by towns; in modern usage usually called “parks.” (–Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition)
VULGAR – noun – The common people. [It has no plural termination, but has often a plural verb.] The vulgar imagine the pretender to have been a child imposed on the nation. – adjective – 1.Pertaining to the common unlettered people;as vulgar life. 2. Used or practiced by common people; as vulgar sports. 3.Vernacular; national. It might be more useful to the English reader, to write in our vulgar language. 4.Common; used by all classes of people; as the vulgar version of the scriptures. 5.Public; as vulgar report. 6.Mean; rustic; rude; low; unrefined; as vulgar ninds; vulgar manners. 7.Consisting of common persons. In reading an account of a battle, we follow the hero with our whole attention, but seldom reflect on the vulgar heaps of slaughter. Vulgar fractions, in arithmetic, fractions expressed by a numerator and denominator; thus 2/5. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the American Language)
–=–
Do not miss the most important aspect of being common as listed above. We are always represented, either by a legislature, municipality, or by an attorney in court, never self-governing or self-responsible. We exist not in a constitutional system but an administrative system. Public persons are always administered, for public persons are under strict law, having no legal right or standing to make moral choices. We are all wards of the state by birth certification (abandonment). But what you likely don’t know is that to be represented by another (agent/attorney) is a sign of incompetence, of a vulgar mind, or one not regenerate or versed in the law or higher functions — in other words, one that is not self-governed. This is not merely the author’s opinion, this is the structure of legal, US law. If you don’t know the legal language, you cannot be free from its clutches and trickery.
The following quotes and citations tell the story of how the common citizen is considered by his low, mean, vulgar status in public, legal persona:
–=–
“The practice of Law is an occupation of common right.”
–Sims v. Aherns, 71 S.W. 720 (1925)
–=–
“The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State.”
–Schwarz v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238,239
–=–
“Between 75% to 90% of all lawyers are either incompetent, dishonest, or both.”
—Earl Warren, former Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court
—=—
“(a) The controlling rule is that “absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person may be imprisoned for any offense… unless he was represented by counsel at his trial.”
–Atgersinger, 407 U.S., at 37. Pp. 5-6. —Alabama v Shelton 535 U.S. 654
–=–
“…the trial of a misdemeanor starts that no imprisonment may be imposed,even though local law permits it, unless the accused is represented by counsel.”
–Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 40 (1971)
—=—
“He is however in a sense an officer of the state with an obligation to the court…His first duty is to the courts and to the public, not to the client, and whenever his duties to his client conflict with those as an officer of the court, in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the later. Clients are also called ‘wards of the court‘…”
—7 Corpus Juris Secundum, Section 4, on “Attorneys”
—=—
“His (an attorney’s/public defender’s) first duty is to the courts… not to the client.”
—U.S.v Franks D.C.N.J. 53F.2d 128.
—=—
“Clients are also called ‘wards of the court‘ in regard to their relationship with their attorneys.”
—Spilker v. Hansin, 158 F.2d 35, 58U.S.App.D.C. 206.
—=—
“Wards of court – Infants and persons of unsound mind.”
If you can’t practice law as your public right because you are ignorant of its terms and usage, then you are of unsound mind, which means you must be represented and placed in wardship. This is 99.9% of all US citizenships. Ignorance of law, both of God and of the legal state, and the resulting ineptness that ignorance causes, is key to the whole administrative, corporate state’s existence and business model.
The practice of law is a common right, meaning it belongs to the public. In other words, you give up that right the second you hire an attorney to re-present you. Only incompetent, unlearned, unregenerate men (acting as public persons) need representation. In other words, the second you contract an attorney, you become a ward of the court, for the attorney cannot act on your behalf unless the attorney is hired. Yes, attorneys are the ultimate prostitutes of the corporate state. It’s their job description. They do not work for you, the client, they work for the court, the state, and its profitable interest. This is to say that the second that attorney speaks on your behalf within a court (at bar), this very action sets the jurisdiction and status of the client (you). Once the first word is officially spoken, the client becomes a ward of court. The attorney literally cannot speak and would not unless the assumption of that courts jurisdiction was upon himself as your representative. To put it even clearer, to be a ward is to be subject. In other words, you lose the second you receive and accept representation. You are lost in the legal matrix code at this point. And as we can read, this step is crucial for the administrative process, for it cannot in its de facto (illegitimate) state of commerce and contract law do anything to you unless you accept representation. It cannot throw you in a for-profit prison without representation. There are no exceptions to this rule. So remain ignorant of the law that governs your person at your own peril.
I cannot relay unto you how you and I have been tricked and robbed of all natural right and dignity unless I can cause you to understand that everything we have been tricked into doing, into acting, and into speaking, is vulgar (common). We speak the vulgar language called English, which is also known as the vulgarity of dog-Latin. We therefore read the Bible in English, which is referred to above as the vulgar version. We act in the lowest and thus most vulgar of legal status (persona), which is a common, national citizenship instead of a private, self-governing Statehood (People). Another word for national is listed above as common, which again is why US citizens are not part of the private States we reside in. And we interact in every way and with everything in the most vulgar of intent and purpose, which is on the behalf of money and this artificial value system that can only be expressed via the monetary revaluation of all Reality, and which is referred to as mammon — where all things and all men (under status) have a price, including our own morality, dignity, posterity, choice, and fate. In mammon, even the acknowledgement of Truth can be sold to lies. We have been devolved into this state, even as we are tricked into the delusion that US citizenship is an elevation in status. In fact, there is no lower status than national (commercial) citizenship. We can get no lower, for we can get no farther from being a moral, self-governing people. With this understanding as the basis of exactly what we have been voluntarily subjected to, only then may we come to understand these pension and other financial schemes and why they are created and executed in the distinct and corrupt way they are. Volunteerism, that is, choice, is everything, for it is simply the choice between the Law of God (Nature) or the legal law mammon (money). What is priceless (i.e. a Creation of God) is legally recreated (corrupted) by men into that which carries a price, a valuation in artifice, the fiction of law that is currency, credit, and debt.
This essay is not merely focused on the subject of its title, as should be apparent at this point, but stands as a summation of all my previous exposures of the CAFR accounting system and global pension fund schemes, as well as my free documentary films and CAFR School articles and videos found on this blog and at my other website: TheCorporationNation.com. It also reflects the years of research that went into my book series on law entitled Strawman. It’s now been eight years since I released my first documentary film, aptly entitled, The Corporation Nation, with the in depth follow-up called, The Great Pension Fund Hoax, with CAFR School made shortly thereafter. And, in looking back at this seemingly fruitless adventure in attempting public exposure and action, it’s this authors resulting opinion that we are approaching a time when all these plans heretofore exposed by yours Truly have now reached their pinnacle, a boiling-over point, finally proving themselves as the ponzi schemes they have always been, and thus finally coming to their intended fruition. We are entering into the climax of the story, the end as it was always planned by the authors of these pension “plans.” I offer this essay now not because I feel there is still a time to ward off what is to come, but for the purposes of providing a clearer understanding of the complete story, to leave at least a documentary essay of this almost inconceivable puzzle as a whole, as the incontrovertible truth in all its pieces to those few souls that seek to discover it no matter how uncomfortable and self-damning it may be to those brave enough to comprehend it and thus take equal responsibility for it.
I can only suggest that we have already entered into that not long ago foretold Orwellian time of a dystopian hell on earth, where telling the truth is a revolutionary act, and where, as Arthur Schopenhauer once predicated:
–=–
“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.“
–=–
What I present to you herein is exactly that, being the self-evident truth of our collective, societal disposition under a not-so-new globalist or “one-world” government and just how it has happened – but more importantly how it could not have happened without this globalist pension fund hoax (scheme) and why it was all perfectly “legal.” My name and efforts have been ridiculed and violently opposed by many that have a stake in such pension schemes, as should be expected, even while we are experiencing the reality of its undeniable truths today. Those who shall have their so-called “retirements” washed away into eventual nothingness will watch it all disappear like a ship sailing off into the horizon, a modern great flood caused by the angry and zealous demi-gods of money, the de facto government itself.
Yet make no mistake here, for all of us are complicit. All of us are to blame, myself included. Nothing stated in this essay does not include myself nor dismisses my own publicly imposed ignorance on the subject, which I have happily corrected and at least tempted to share with you. Why is this True? We have all contributed voluntarily to our own collective dystopian transformation into globalism, a corporate new world order, and even now the intolerable consequences of our collective ignorance and inaction are nigh. There is no need to utilize or promote fear, for that time has passed. Fear is only useful for cause or prevention, not for the already manifest consequences of purposeful ignorance. If anything, the reader may find merely a purpose for preparation against what is this globalist scheme. I offer within this exposure no hope, just the truth. For when the truth is known and adhered to, no hope is needed, and no lie can defeat us. I do not hold out any hope that things will change from within this system, only without. And deep down we all know that only each of us alone can change, stop participating, and stop contributing to our own economic enslavement. But this most essential key of the realization and actualization of self-responsibility has been stolen from us, reeducated away from us, to the point where at all times and in all events, everyone else is to blame but never ones self.
In essence, this is exactly the dependent mindset and lifestyle desired and designed for us by those who seek to control us. And so far, it’s been a flawless execution, as we have performed our parts (as debtors) with graceless fanaticism and strangely misplaced patriotism.
The easy version of this essay is simply that all governmental corporations, from the city to the state and national level, have unofficially merged. Not the common people, just the artificial persons (e.g municipal corporations). We must understand though that these are but tools, agents of the actual governmental structure, being incorporated entities thereof and under its umbrella of international law. In other words, these are not governments in and of themselves. Yet they are tasked by the source, de jure (legitimate) government to stand in its place, in its name, and under its law. Chicago, or the incorporated City of Chicago, is not an independent government, but one completely subservient to its creator (state/nation) its law. These, including the so-called “United States” municipal corporation located outside of and foreign to the 50 States united in Washington D.C., are called de facto governments. One seldom if ever finds a system of government in any nation that does not have both, the legitimate always justifying and creating the illegitimate due to reasons such as war and emergency, where constitutional law is all but suspended.
But don’t take my word for it, just read what Congress had to say about it:
“Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency… These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of Federal law. These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.“
–93d Congress 1st Session – SENATE Report No. 93-549 EMERGENCY POWERS STATUTES: Provisions of Federal Law Now in Effect Delegating to the Executive Extraordinary Authority in Time of National Emergency – introduction section of the REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON THE TERMINATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY UNITED STATES SENATE NOVEMBER 19, 1973. Link–> https://archive.org/stream/senate-report-93-549/senate-report-93-549_djvu.txt
–=–
Now stop and think about these statements by Congress for a moment before we move on… and no, they did not fix this problem. In fact, they are quite content with it because it takes any responsibility out of their hands. They can pretend that their hands are tied while the president runs rampant. And no, nothing has changed since this congressional publication, though it has gotten much, much worse.
What, in peace time, controls such things as property management, production, commodity storage and distribution, transportation and communication, private enterprise, travel, and all the other plethora of commercial activity of American citizens?
Why corporations, of course. Why is this true? Because corporations are creations of and under government law. As fictional, legal, artificial persons (corporations), they simply cannot exist without their fictional, governmental source. But most importantly, in peace time, we must ask who owns these corporations that run the commercial world? The answer to that question is the entire basis and intent of the creation of the pension fund scheme. For he that owns stock in a corporation, owns that part of the corporation. Through pension funds, government is now the owner and thus controller of most corporations worldwide not merely in war or emergency, but in peacetime (which is just another word for free-flowing international and interstate commerce). And this is how the illegitimate governmental structure, a creation of the legitimate constituted government, took over its creator in both war (emergency) and peace times. For the distinction between what is a time of war and emergency and what is peace has been so blurred that most common folks have no idea that no war has ever been declared legitimately by congress since World War II, and that all military actions since have been illegitimate Executive Branch (presidential) actions done through the doctrine of emergency, through Presidential Directives and Executive Orders. All that death and destruction on both sides was all done despite Congress, or in other words, without the representatives of the States. And that’s just how they like it.
NATIONAL EMERGENCY – A state of national crisis; a situation demanding immediate and extraordinary national or federal action. Congress has made little or no distinction between a “state of national emergency” and a “state of war.” (Black’s Law Dictionary)
DE FACTO – In fact, in deed, actually. This phrase is used to characterize an officer, a government, a past action, or a state of affairs which exists actually and must be accepted for all practical purposes, but which is illegal or illegitimate. In this sense it is the contrary of de jure, which means rightful,legitimate, just, or constitutional. Thus, an officer, king, or government de facto is one who is in actual possession of the office or supreme power, butby usurpation, or without respect to lawful title; while an officer, king, or governor de jure is one who has just claim and rightful title to the office or power,but who has never had plenary possession of the same, or is not now in actual possession. So a wife de facto is one whose marriage is voidable by decree, as distinguished from a wife de jure, or lawful wife. But the term is also frequently used independently of any distinction from de jure; thus a blockade de facto is a blockade which is actually maintained, as distinguished from a mere paper blockade. As to de facto “Corporation,” “Court,” “Domicile,” “Government,” and “Officer,” see those titles. In old English law. De facto means respecting or concerning the principal act of a murder, which was technically denominated fact. (–Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd Edition)
–=–
So how does a ruler that is unrightfully a dictator at heart, that is, a president or bloodline of rulers that hold only non-plenary (non-possessive) positions in a legitimate government, as non-landholders, become the opposite, as illegitimate plenary holders of that over which they govern? Simple. Turn all legitimate government agencies into illegitimate ones, all established cities into incorporated tools of the dictator (bloodline). In other words, incorporate the world! Turn all Real things into artificial persons, places, and things (nouns) by legal status and place them under your system of law… including all the common people. All common people must become “natural persons” of the illegitimate, incorporated district government, the corporation called “United States,” while at the same time still be made to believe they are part of the source, of the legitimate People of the foreign (private) 50 States united. But the “United States” district corporation is foreign to each state, just as each state is foreign to all others, also called private or several. Please see my free-to-download book, Strawman, for a full, neutral breakdown of these legal facts. They are not disputable but by the ignorant, patriotic believer that holds no evidence for those beliefs.
Whatever you may think your “government” is as it manifests in these corporate, municipal entities, I assure you, they are not the same as what you are taught in history class or political science. Education is a process of dumbing down, not a lifting up. Nor is the securities and exchange scam and pension fund ponzi scheme in any way a legitimate governmental operation. In essence, we have allowed over many dumbed down, tricked generations, the de jure form of government to manifest itself within its own evermore de facto shadow, to the point where the original and rightful government and its constitution sits absentee from most commercial, international operations of its de facto corporations and municipal districts, standing only when it need to justify its shadow in the light of scrutiny, as is the honorary position of all so-called “rightful” kings (legal gods). Congress is too busy with the management of its created, de facto, corporate empire called “United States” to bother with anything legitimate (de jure) anymore. And the reason for this is quite clear and simple… the common people have lost the art and ability to govern themselves, and have become completely dependent and in love with the illegitimate money, credit, and commerce system created by congress into this de facto (illegitimate), non-governmental structure of international and administrative law. By turning the legal status of all men and all things (properties) legally illegitimate (artificial) as well, including our de facto marriages that can be suspended by decree (divorce), causing all our children to be re-born without recognition of blood-right into this de facto district of the corporate municipal states (federal areas/districts) and under that corporate “United States” through birth certification, and leaving us all standing only as national (corporate) foreigners in the States (territory/land) we reside (without ownership).
Yet we still believe that as incorporated, contracted, completely commercial and subservient US citizens that we’re somehow also “Free” as “We, the People.” But those “People” only exist in the States, not in the corporation nation. This, of course, is why Federal (“United States”) commercial (interstate) law trumps state law in every way, for a US citizenship is not protected in any way from “United States” because that legal, national status belongs to its creator, the “United States” corporation and district. This is not a self-governing status in Nature, in blood, but a fictional persona (mask) worn by common (vulgar) people that cannot govern themselves or has been so dumbed-down that self-governing is impossible.
To be clear, there are two forms of freedom. The first is Natural Freedom, being a state of spiritual Being self-governed under the Law of Nature (God), being totally self-responsible, and without legal protection or respect of anything artificial (creations of men). The opposite version is citizenship, or political freedom, called by the legal terminology as freedom, which is defined as enfranchisement – to be free in a legal, public, open-air prison called a district (e.g. that of the District of Columbia). The slaves were not freed naturally, but nationalized by enfranchisement. They were made US citizenships (persons), given protective legal status. But with protection comes subjection, a maxim of law. US citizens, white or black, believe they are naturally free (self-governed) under subjection to God’s Law (the Law of Nature) when in fact they are enfranchised (legally free) under subjection to false, legal gods (magistrates) and their army of administrative agents. And so to understand these international pension fund and globalism schemes, this difference between what is Natural and what is artificial (legal) and political must be understood. For a subject has no rights under God (Nature) as a man, carrying only the contracted to legal rights assigned to his person (legal status) in society, in agency (enfranchisement). Only the self-governing man under the Law of Nature (God’s Law) is and can be Naturally Free. Again, this is not disputable, and stands as the foundation of law. More importantly, we must know that by law and even logically, a person (status) cannot be Truly Free in Nature, for a person is not of Nature, not of the God of Nature. A person (legal status) is a creation of man, not a Creation of God (Nature). Nothing that is legal is of Reality, of Nature. This is self-evident, though it may be ridiculed and violently opposed by those so corrupted by their own legal person-hood that they believe they Truly are that persona. You may believe that you are the mask (persona) you wear (use), but you are not. You are Reality, part of Nature, and nothing of fiction is of Nature nor of man. Pension funds are created and administered on behalf of persons, not men. Men have no right to pension benefits, only persons do. But persons have no rights other than what is bestowed them contractually. This is how men are taken from their Natural element and “God-given” Rights of blood inheritance and rebirth into the legal realm of fiction. In other words, men have no Natural Right to claim anything of the legal fiction, for Natural Rights are said to be God-given and thus unalienable. To make legal claims to fictional properties (persons, places, and things), one must subject themselves to such a status as is recognized by the de facto state (district), which is opposed to Nature and thus Nature’s God (Creator). Remember, this is not religion, but there very essence and structure of law. The legal gods cannot control men of (Creations of) God unless they turn away from God’s Nature and accept legal fiction as their false reality. And this is the whole essence of the Bible and why it is accepted as the foundation of law. Once the Bible (moral) law is broken by men that accept personhood (legal status) for gain in mammon (commerce, money, etc), then the Law of Nature is broken, and the man no longer has the unwritten protection of God’s Law. In other words, he can no longer be self-governing under God’s Law of Nature because he is using the artificial property (fictional title/name/number) of another man’s recreation, not that of God’s Creation of Nature (Reality).
—=—
“The true name of Satan, the Cabalists say, is that of Yahveh reversed; for Satan is not a black god, but the negation of God. The devil is the personification of Atheism or Idolatry. For the Initiates, this is not a Person, but a Force, created for good, but which may serve for evil. It is the instrument of Liberty for Free Will.”
—Albert Pike, ‘Morals and Dogma,’ Page 102
—=—
“May theForce be with you…”
—Line from Star Wars, a proverb spoken universally by Jedi on both the light and dark side
—=—
It’s all about using the force, a power created by the negation of God and Its Law and Laws of Nature. Power without Law, without God. In other words Super (above) natural power. Authority without conscious or moral checks. What appears as the light leads irrevocably to the dark side and back again, for the light is artificial. And even Satan (darkness) appears as if the light, lies as if Truth.
All sound familiar? Did you actually think the Star Wars saga was a good thing?
Better read between the lines to see the real agenda…
—=—
“…We stand on the threshold of a new beginning. In order to ensure our security and continuing stability, the Republic will be reorganized into the first Galactic Empire, for a safe and secure society, which I assure you will last for ten thousand years. An Empire that will continue to be ruled by this august body anda sovereign ruler chosen for life. An Empire ruled by the majority,ruled by a new constitution!
“By bringing the entire galaxy under one law, one language, and the enlightened guidance of one individual, the corruption that plagued the Republic in its later years will never take root. Regional governors will eliminate the bureaucracy that allowed the Separatist movement to grow unchecked. A strong and growing military will ensure the rule of law.
“Under the Empire’s New Order, our most cherished beliefs will be safeguarded. We will defend our ideals by force of arms. We will give no ground to our enemies and will stand together against attacks from within or without. Let the enemies of the Empire take heed: those who challenge Imperial resolve will be crushed…”
—The Declaration of a New Order,
a proclamation by Supreme Chancellor Palpatine
as an Extraordinary Session of the Galactic Senate and then to the general populace,
proclaiming himself Emperor of the galaxy:
from the science fiction movie series ‘Star Wars’
–=–
Very familiar indeed. Agenda 2030 as an organized world government within the United Nations is expressed here in its bitter totality. Be it a galaxy of planets or a world of nations, the goal is the same. UN Peacekeeping forces will and certainly are enforcing international law even as we speak. But just does it work?
“The UN has no military forces of its own, and Member States provide, on a voluntary basis, the military and police personnel required for each peacekeeping operation.
Peacekeeping soldiers are paid by their own Governments according to their own national rank and salary scale. Countries volunteering uniformed personnel to peacekeeping operations are reimbursed by the UN at a standard rate, approved by the General Assembly, of a little over US$1,332 per soldier per month.
Police and other civilian personnel are paid from the peacekeeping budgets established for each operation.
The UN also reimburses Member States for providing equipment, personnel and support services to military or police contingents.”
When the public subjects (contracted, money-driven agents) can be convinced to militarily force-govern themselves to follow a foreign international law, the law of nations and declarations of the United Nations (global governance), and actually believe that this false offering from the legal gods of “peace and security” is a good thing, then any scrap of private sovereignty and freedom is lost. The national military of the United States (a de facto standing army in peacetime) now contracts and works for an outside force, which was the biggest complaint within the Declaration of Independence.
The typical fool that is the common US citizen would call this unconstitutional, never realizing that the corporate “United States” is strictly an un-constituted commercial entity, and thus already wholly unconstitutional (de facto). The constitution established a union between States (People), not a corporation. Congress created the “United States” later, eventually moving the seat of government to the foreign district of Washington DC, while wearing two very different hats.
What is artificial? It’s a simple equation, really. Artifice is anything created by man. Be it words or inventions or devices, what is man-made is necessarily opposed to Nature and Its Law, designed either to harness it inharmoniously or thwart it altogether. This too is self-evident. It is neither good nor bad, it just is. The Law of Nature only protects that which is belongs to and emirates from (as a Creation of) Nature, which is said to be the continuous Creation of the Living God. Again, this is not religion, but stands as the basic foundation of law as used in all nations. Man’s law only governs man’s inventions (creations) and nothing else, and this includes the names/nouns of all persons, places, and things, for names don’t ever occur naturally, being always manmade. A fox is not born into nature as a “fox” but as a nameless, priceless (without mammon) Creature (Creation) of God and nothing else, as is each man and each flower and each tree. Once the foundation of Law (the Bible) is ignored, one of the most important of those Laws of Nature (God) stating over and over throughout the scriptures that man should never act in or respect persons (names/nouns) or flattering titles (names/nouns) over the Reality they represent, then man can no longer claim any Natural Rights as listed in the Declaration of Independence. For Natural independence and Freedom requires men (male and female) to be self-governing under the Law of Nature (God). Once again, this is a self-evident Truth. One cannot be owned as property and also be Free and Naturally independent of its owner. And the only thing that proves Natural Freedom is the Law a man follows. To this, we may use the correct verbiage of the word religion, where man follows the Law of God (Nature) religiously without err. All religions are legal corporations with their own constituted doctrine (law) against that of the Bible. Again, the Bible is not religion, but is a Book of Law to be followed religiously, just as one might religiously drink a cup of coffee every morning. Religions, as corporations (artificial persons), are property of the state and thus under the legal law. And why is this important? Because the legal law stands only in direct opposition of the Bible as a Book of Law. That’s the whole point. Choice. Volunteerism. De jure and de facto. Religion is a legal replacement for spirituality, causing us to never act according to the Bible Law, but instead paying mammon to a corporation to conduct legal charity. Charity is part of spiritual self-responsibility, not a thing to be passed to another. It is a spiritual action, not a legal property.
For total understanding of these fact, we only need understand just what the totally misunderstood legal term “freedom of religion” actually means as applied to legal law. For this, I refer to my own book, wherein I have already broken down these terms of art (artifice) for what they truly mean:
Begin Excerpt:
To get a clear comprehension of how a man acting in the incorporation and agency of legal persona necessarily and by law chooses government as his religion over that of God’s Law in scriptural teachings, we must understand what it means to have True “Religious Freedom” as a reserved Natural Right as opposed to its adversarial legalese word-magic of positive law terms of art licensing generally the legal right of “freedom of religion.” Just a simple rearrangement of words and the whole meaning changes. Here we find the substance of Religious Freedom juxtaposed to its adversarial legal form of freedom of religion as a purely legal concept of the franchise of public servitude. This positive law recreation of a negative law absolute is reworded and redefined as legal (anti-God) law in the United States district specifically for public performance debtors, as the legal right and obligations of voluntarily enslaved “citizen-ships” (vessels in prostitution to the gods of the nation), which are the subjects of government and its false gods. And these false gods will allow no other gods before themselves, for their law is opposed to the Law of God’s Nature. The choice is clear, Reality with self-control as self-governance under the Natural Law or fiction with military rule and forced governance under the artificial law of gods of mammon.
This is one of the most important lessons in this work. Please ensure full comprehension between these two very different “freedoms” before you proceed with this work. For as a citizenship of the United States, the attachment to your strawman as property under the law of persons only allows you to fall under the “freedom of religion” as a limited legal outlet of commercial franchise. In other words, “Religious Freedom” is against the law of the United States for its subjects (persons). Notice the different phraseology and how important they are here. For remember, to have the “freedom of” anything in a legal society means to have the “franchise of” the altered, fictional concept of whatever that government allows.
RELIGIOUS FREEDOM – Within constitution embraces not only the right to worship God according to the dictates of one’s conscience, but also the right to do,or forbear to do, any act, for conscience sake,the doing or forbearing of which is not inimical to the peace, good order, and morals of society. (Black4)
FREEDOM OF RELIGION – Embraces the concept offreedom to believe and freedom to act, the first of which(belief)is absolute, but the second of which(action based on belief)remains subject to regulation for protection of society.(Black4)
—=—
Now you tell me, what good is religious, moral belief if you are not allowed to act upon it? To be clear, this state of confusion at bar is the very purpose of nations, to prevent self-governing, moral standing in men. For no moral man would allow a nation as this to continue in its abhorrent actions against God (Nature) and man. But the moral man is cowed and pacified by his surety to the law of his persona (mask), afraid to bite the hand that feeds it. We are so smitten and proud of our nationality (false identity), our personality (reputation) in public that we don’t dare risk doing what is Right and Lawful in and under the Law of God (Nature). This is unmistakably and self-evidently the work of the devil (the attorney class) and its scribes.
These are completely separate definitions, on separate pages of the dictionary. They are not at all the same thing. As citizenships of the “United States” corporation, you better damn well know the difference before proceeding herein, and before you try and act morally in a society that strictly forbids moral actions without artificial, legal license from the state.
Freedom of moral thought, but not freedom to act upon that conscious moral thought… This is what public, legal freedom (franchise) is when defined by the commercial gods — a legal corporation called government. It is not the Natural Freedom of religion under God, but franchise of religion under the legal state. These are as the rules set for employees (agents) by their employer (principal). This is not Natural freedom under God, which is described above as Religious Freedom. This is tyranny named (noun) as “freedom,” where the ability to practice religion is confounded and limited to the franchise it belongs to (of), as freedom (franchise) of (belonging to) religion (memberships to legal corporations, as the legal, anti-God definition of religion as an artificial person in law). In the “United States,” the very opposing lack of a moral standing in God’s Law (religious, spiritual Life) is the official state religion, as an enforced, amoral lack of It. Legal freedom is only a franchise allowed to fictional persons. Governments cannot control in totality your thought processes, only your actions (anti-pro-verb) while in its property. Specifically, we must recognize absolutely that the purpose of the legal law and the institution of corporate (state licensed) religions is to prevent man from acting upon his moral thoughts and beliefs.
“It’s impossible to have religious freedom in any nation where churches are licensed to the government.”
—Congressman George Hansen, quoted from “In Caesar’s Grip,” by Peter Kershaw
—=—
“The framers of our Constitution meant we were to have freedom of religion, not freedom from religion.”
—Billy Graham
–=–
End Excerpt.
Which one of these is listed as a Natural Right protected also in the constitution? Religious freedom.
Which one of these is a legal right of US citizenships? Freedom of religion.
Freedom belonging to (of) religion is the more correct way of saying it, meaning to be under the legal sanction and false liberties of the false doctrines of corporate religion, all of which pay homage and tribute to the legal law of the land over the Law of God, as opposed to the True and moral God-given Freedom to express religiously the Law of God as the highest moral law that causes True Freedom from man’s devices. “Freedom of religion” is a noun (in name only), while “religious freedom” is a verb (action). This difference is everything, and it applies to those so-called freedoms of speech, press, ect. These are but well-told lies. And as Orwell deduced, freedom within and under the government corporation is certainly just slavery by another (legal) name.
Here is a perfect example from history that shows what freedom of speech really is, and how the Executive Order is used against any legitimate practice or congressional approval of law:
—=—
“You will take possession by military force of the printing establishments of the New York World and Journal of Commerce… and prohibit any further publication thereof… You are therefore commanded forthwith to arrest and imprison … the editors, proprietors and publishers of the aforementioned newspapers.”
—Executive Order by President Lincoln, May 18, 1864
—=—
And that, ladies and gentlemen of the goyim, common class, is a True look at the actual history of how freedom of the press is just another patriotic fallacy.
Oh, but Lincoln was a hero, right? That’s just more idolatry of this bloodline of false, legal, flatteringly titled gods (magistrates). There is only one hero, one you can emulate and become just like. And Jesus wasn’t even super (above) nature like the rest of the superheros. His powers came only from Nature (God), not above it. Wow! So can yours, if you learn and follow the example.
Or you can pray that your pensions stay outrageously and unreasonable secure. Yep, pray to God for more money. Pray to Nature to invoke its nemesis, mammon. Ask Reality for fiction. That’s the answer… Yet turn on any evangelist on television and that’s exactly what they are instructing the vast wasteland and idocracy of false christians to do!
And you dare to ask why society has degraded as it has? This legal “right” of not being allowed to express your thoughts applies to all moral concepts and scriptural, spiritual Laws, regardless of origin. So declaring oneself an atheist will cause no change in this rule, but rather strengthens the fact that one needs to be a ward in public servitude, for an atheist necessarily decries the Bible as common Law, an act that actually used to be unlawful in public. What would you do with such an idiot that would publicly declare himself to be against the very foundation of law? You’d make him a ward, of course, or perhaps in other countries you’d publicly execute him or her as an infidel and a devil. Ironically, it is the law that protects the lawless from themselves. And from what I’ve seen, every self-proclaimed atheist may dress the part, but acts as a good little citizen complete with driver’s license and social security number. Like the corporate Christian wearing a cross, the title nor the clothing nor the bearing of symbols and idols make the man. One either follows the Law or one follows the anti-law (legalism). There is no in-between, despite what you may call yourself. Again, the Truth may hurt, but only if you live in a lie. Like it or not, my statements here are not only neutral, but backed up by the Bible and the legal system. I forgive any who choose to shoot the messenger instead of facing Reality.
To stand openly in non-belief of “God” is still a religious belief, unprovable and misguided as it may be. The legal law is strict and does not allow moral opposition in action, only in thought. That’s why most religions are called protestants. They protest, but don’t anything about it. Protestors seldom accomplish anything, including the incorporated religions designated by that title. And so to declare that your morals come from a source or no source at all, they are still illegal to act upon. So a public declaration of being “Christian” or “atheist” is in fact, in law, a mute point. Even if it were true, you wouldn’t be allowed to practice your beliefs (or non-beliefs) if they conflict with the legal law. The only Truth is that we are all in this together as duped, contracted common US citizens, regardless of what flattering title (Christian, atheist, etc.) we call ourselves. The Bible does not tell us to be Christians, only to follow the Law by example of Christ. We are not to to be fans (idolators). A slave is a slave by any other name. And that’s why the Bible Law is so adamant that we never call our True Self as anything but a part of the Whole, part of God’s Nature, for the law of man only applies to legalistic names and titles not originating in Nature. This is so simple, so self-evident, that I am astounded we have all been so utterly tricked into worshiping legalism (fiction, artifice) over Reality (Nature, God), and also that it took me so long to figure it all out by untangling this web of deceit and its terms of art.
Let me be clear that there are many men acting as gods (government and church magistrates) in the Bible, all given the name of “god” by the English King’s transliterators.
We merely need to read the Bible itself to understand this:
–=–
“Now I know that the LORD (translation: Jehovah) is greater than all gods (translation: elohiym): for in the thing wherein they dealt proudly he was above them.“
–Exodus 18:11, KJB
–=–
Natures God is always highest, thus so is Its Law. We can plainly read the comparison of these two different notions of just what a god or lord is. Each use of the word god in the Bible carries up to 20 different meanings, most of them referring to men acting as kings and magistrates (legal gods). Yet those that read the Bible are convince that only the God of Nature is referred to therein with each usage of the generic word. And so God (Nature) in its neutral existence is blamed for the evils of men acting as legal gods, as popes and kings and judges. Why is this important? Because we are worshiping our own false gods, in president Trump and in congress and in the administrative judicial and supreme court. They are lords. Gods. But I assure you that each of them know well their inferiority to the God of Nature and Its Law, which their legal designs and opinions can never defeat. This is not religion, but is the essence of our system of law. Only the self-governing, Bible-reading, Spiritually Lawful man (son of God) may defeat these false, legal gods and their designs by not participating in their schemes. But the deed is now done. This is our story. His-story. It is the entire structure of our system of law. To ignore it is to volunteer to legal enslavement. I don’t desire to cause you to believe in any God, for God is defined as Existence, and so to not believe in God is literally to be a nihilist, to believe that existence does not exist. This is the foolishness of atheism, yet another well-laid and completely irrational legal trap, almost as clever as corporate membership Christianity by a flattering title in idol worship under membership. The de facto (illegitimate) commercial governmental structure can not thrive without causing total ignorance of the Bible (foundational) Law, which is total moral, spiritual, and temporal self-governance in and under Truth (God).
To be clear, if one acts upon the moral, scriptural law, this is considered in the legal realm as a thought crime. The state acts always immoral, or at best, amoral (without moral consideration). The legal law is amoral, while the scripture is purely moral. The two cannot be mixed, only used to prove or disprove the other, or as a check and balance. To act legally is to act against God’s Law of Nature, for what is legal is not of Nature and thus cannot be controlled by Its Law. This is once again a self-evident Truth. This is the very essence of choice, which legally is called volunteerism, or the doctrine of Master and Servant. One is either a servant of God’s Creation of Nature and Its Law or a servant of man’s creation of artifice and its administration (legal law). If the reader cannot somehow accept this because of a lifetime of indoctrination in public schooling and entertainments designed to keep this knowledge from us all, then the reader should consider him or herself a success and should stop reading this and get back to the dissimulation of persona we have been brainwashed to be accustomed to. For those that can get past the metaphor to realize the moral story and its application to Reality, then pleas proceed to get the full story of how we’ve all been duped by false, legal gods (magistrates) of the legal realm, the re-creators of mammon.
Here we stand, unified in our collective ignorance while the entirety of the earth is fictionalized (renamed as legal nouns – persons, places, and things) and purchased (legally conquered) out from under us through such schemes as the world-wide public pension and Social Security systems, the globalism of which would be impossible without the modern creation of digital identity – a global matrix of commercial, legal (artificial) life represented as digital information in what is quickly becoming the central AI, the internet of all legal (artificial) persons, places, and things (names/nouns). We are experiencing its emergent growing pains with every cry of de facto corporate government oppression and mismanagement.
For the purposes of this essay and lesson on CAFR (government audit) reporting and this collective public pension fund scheme designed to rob the middle class government employee and the entirety of the collective taxpayer base that supports them, the following three quotes strike a fatal resemblance to our currently staged, so-called financial crisis.
–=–
“If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too.”
—W. S. Maugham,English playwright, novelist and short story writer
–=–
“The study of money, above all other fields in economics, is one
in which complexity is used to disguise truth or to evade truth, not to reveal it. The process by which banks create money is so simple the mind is repelled. With something so important, a deeper mystery seems only decent.”
—John Kenneth Galbraith, Canadian-born economist,
Harvard professor, from ‘Money: Whence It Came, Where It Went’ (1975)
–=–
“The king bankers put in motion, in 1907, a great scheme. They had gambled and speculated on Wall Street until so many watered stocks and bonds had been manufactured…The king bankers knew the condition and informed the favored of their friends what was to come. There was to be a panic in the fall of 1907 that would be advertised as the result of our bad banking and currency laws.”
—Charles Lindbergh, Congressman from Minnesota (1907-1917)
–=–
History doesn’t simply repeat as if it was a sentient entity or programmed mechanical contraption. Good history at its best is but a well-told lie by the victors, by the contrivers and schemers, the conspirators behind the story. As an excuse, history is a perfect scapegoat and a wonderfully powerful obfuscation. Only the moral man substantially learns from history. The immoral man seeks to represent it in its sameness under the disguise of modern technique and dress. Thus the value of history to its teller is as a treasure map, a blueprint of criminal design, while to its listener it is merely a form of religious, unprovable belief understood only in the most vulgar of terms, just as a dog understands the simplistic commands of yes and no. History is a game card that is played over and over again under slightly different disguises. For a scheme by any other name is still a scheme. And yet, even though pension funds are literally and popularly known as pension fund “schemes,” this perfect description seems to be ignored by its idyllic worshipers — its members and contributors. But let us be clear… other words as synonyms for the word scheme are contrivance, plan, conspiracy, plot, a waiting game, to connive, a bubble, a falsehood, and an untruth. The judicial system, as well as our current and past economic and social systems, and any other form of social organization, are also called as schemes.
What is a conspiracy but a plan between two or more people to do harm to another?
Hey, we’re so dumbed down that we don’t even understand this country was founded on a conspiracy!
CONSPIRACY – Criminal law, torts. An agreement between two or more persons to do an unlawful act,or an act which may become by the combination injurious to others… (Bouv1856)
CONFEDERACY – Criminal law. An agreement between two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or an act,which though not unlawful in itself, becomes so by the confederacy. The technical term usually employed to signify this offense, is conspiracy.(Bouvier’s Dictionary of Law, 1856)
–=–
The great scheme is not necessarily the details and schematics of these legal and monetary systems and plans themselves, but rather the control of public opinion. If the end of conspiracy (confederation, combination) is to condition the public hive-mind to believe that usury (interest), grocery (retail), and direct taxes, fines, and fees (exaction, extortion) is somehow not harmful to the public good, or at least not a crime if government does it “constitutionally” or makes it legal (licensed) for corporations to have such privy, and thus to ignore the fact that these are all absolutely crimes against the Law of Nature in every religious, spiritual, and moral teaching (except of course Judaism), then any technical scheme created after this mass social conditioning will likely succeed without even a whimper. What is a nation but a conspiracy? Perhaps you haven’t read the Articles of Confederation (conspiracy)?
A federal government is a state formed by means of a league or confederation. What else needs to be said?
This can only lead to the grossest of behavior and custom…
This word grocer, being the act or organization (incorporation) of the crime of grocery, is a perfect example of how social conditioning schemes (including nationhood) play a most important role in the perfection of such technical schemes as pension funds (i.e. ponzi schemes). We are sold on the idea that we should purchase our food and supplies at our “Friendly Neighborhood Grocer” as if this is a wonderful privilege and convenience (sometimes even called as convenience stores), and as if the grocery store is somehow our friend. But when we uncover the mystery of this word grocer, we suddenly realize how truly dumbed-down we have all been made, how socially organized and schematically controlled we actually are.
We may also discover that the word retail means something quite sinister as well, much akin to usury and extortion:
GROCER – In old English law, a merchant or trader who engrossed all vendible merchandise;an engrosser. See Engrosser. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
ENGROSSER – One who engrosses or writes on parchment in a large, fair hand. One who purchases large quantities of any commodity in order to acquire a monopoly,and to sell them again at high prices.(Black4)
ENGROSS – To copy the rude draft of an instrument in a fair, large hand. To write out, in a large, fair hand, on parchment. In oldcriminal law. To buy up so much of a commodity on the market as to obtain a monopoly and sell again at a forced price.(Black4)
ENGROSSING – In English law. The getting in to one’s possession, or buying up, large quantities of corn, or other dead victuals, with intent to sell them again. The total engrossing of any other commodity, with intent to sell it at an unreasonable price. THIS WAS A MISDEMEANOR, PUNISHABLE BY FINE OR IMPRISONMENT. (Black4)
HIGHWAY ROBBERY – Theft taking place on a public road. Slang for a transaction where one party has such leverage over the other and can demand such a high price so that it is akin to a robbery taking place.(Black2)
TAIL – Fee-tail, as descriptive of an estate in lands, was borrowed from the feudists, among whom it signified any mutilated or truncated inheritance from which the heirs general were “cut off.“(Black4)
–=–
Every retail store is committing a crime called engrossment. This is not in any way up for dispute, nor is it denied by the self-proclaimed “retail store.” One cannot engross without adding a tail (fee), or re-tailing the products they sell.
So how do they get away with it, and why do we accept it as somehow normal (customary)?
Oh, pardon me. Didn’t I mention that government is the main investor in all grocery and retail chains? This is where your contributions, as a member and a taxpayer go to after all, through not only pension funds but all municipal corporations (governments and districts). Thus, it is understandable that these retail engrossers have permission from government to screw us all, considering not only the return on stock investment and corporate bonds (low or no interest loans) for government, but as well the exorbitant amount of taxation generated from such inflated prices. For government, it’s a win-win!
Let us be clear… when a crime is licensed (made permissive to a certain few) by government, the crime is wedged into the delusion of public opinion as being socially acceptable and even seemingly normal, though still obviously, morally outrageous. Usury as well becomes just an apparent part of our lives, which is the most ridiculous concept imaginable when usury is understood as the anchiently recognized crime it is. This trickery, this educated state of accepted victimhood under organized crime (corporate governance), in a nutshell, is the story of our lives. This is exactly how we are conditioned socially to accept such technical economic and financial schemes as the globalist pension fund ponzi scheme we have all been unwittingly contributing to as taxpayers for decades. We support, in other words, our own victimization without comprehension of the causal, social influence that clouds the reality of the consequences of not merely our individual but collective (pooled) actions in ignorance. Such causalities defeat any modicum of moral or even lawful choice we may otherwise manifest. We choose not only to ignore the truth purposefully, but to suppress it even in our familial relationships with our children and friends (as unorganized and organized social groups). Today, the topics of religion and politics are practically taboo amongst the superficiality of public gatherings. Yet these two topics were considered to be the measure of a man in the former generations and centuries now past.
Of course, public school doesn’t even touch on these topics, for public school is specifically designed to teach and keep us all public minded. This, as well, is self-evident.
–=–
“Education is useless without the Bible.”
—Noah Webster
–=–
“I don’t want a nation of thinkers. I want a nation of workers.”
–John D. Rockefeller, who created the General Education Board (GEB)
in 1903 to dispense Rockefeller funds to “education.”
–=–
“The aim of public education is not to spread enlightenment at all, it is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level,to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality.”
–H.L. Mencken
–=–
“The quality of education given to the lower class must be of the poorest sort,so that the moat of ignorance isolating the inferior class from the superior class is and remains incomprehensible to the inferior class. With such an initial handicap, even bright lower class individuals have little if any hope of extricating themselves their assigned lot in life. This form of slavery is essential to maintain some measure of social order, peace, and tranquility for the ruling upper class.”
–“Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars,” page 7
–=–
“A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned,in present-day totalitarian states, to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and SCHOOLTEACHERS”…Most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution…”
–Aldus Huxley
–=–
“There is no authority for the common statement that the primary sense of education is to ‘draw out or unfold the powers of the mind.”
–Century Dictionary
–=–
“Education” is not the word you think it is, as usual, and certainly not what parents are entrained from childhood to believe it is. Etymologically, we find that the words education and training are similar, and that under no pretense should it be assumed that public education is designed to allow free forming thought, moral aptitude, or the ability to self-govern. Education, from etymonline.com, is a noun from the: 1530s, “childrearing,” also “the training of animals,” from Middle French education (14c.) and directly from Latin educationem (nominative educatio) “a rearing, training,” noun of action from past participle stem of educare (see educate). Originally of instruction in social codes and manners; meaning “systematic schooling and training for work” is from 1610s.
We are trained for a life of useless labor and technical nonsense, filled with information that is not knowledge of anything Real, merely technical training (empty information) to fix and maintain the fictional legal matrix that contains us, just as the lower slave-classes that built the ancient stone megaliths, tombs, and pyramids to their own detriment, in honor of their own ruling class of gods. Today, however, we are being trained (tricked) into building the very fictional, cashless control grid and social construct that enslaves us, much of it completely intangible, existing only as pure information and code in the now global computer mainframe and internet of things. Form without substance — a digital world without (outside of) reality, without foundation. We are but “animals,” even according to the US CODE and various registered patents.
But why is this important? Why is being labeled by mans law an “animal” a bad thing? After all, technically it’s true, right?
In fact, no. Remember, words are not Reality, and tyranny only exists when words (nouns) are given respect over their Reality (verb/adjective) the represent. One must understand intent behind all things, and the intent of those gods of government is to be “gods” over their own creation. To be a god, all others must be made lower in status. And since all men under God (in Nature) are said under the law to be “Created equal,” there is only one way to break with that Law of Nature. Men must be assigned persons. A person is always form without substance. A person is always only a status, never the actual man (male or female).
—=—
“The fact that the human being can have the representation “I” raises him infinitely above all the other beings on earth.By this he is a person… that is, a being altogether different in rank and dignity from things, such as irrational animals,with which one may deal and dispose at one’s discretion.”
—Immanuel Kant (between 1772-1789), Lectures on Anthropology, Akademie-Textausgabe, Berlin. Reprint Cambridge University (2012)
—=—
Here are a few examples of the “Man or other animal” (MOOA) declaration of legal status in the US Code for US citizenships, keeping in mind that the “Pure Food and Drug Act” of 1906 in Section 6 defines the words “food” and “drugs” to apply to “man or other animals,” and precedes to define man to be in fact “animal” for the purposes of that code:
—=—
“(2)(b) Food – The term “food” means (1) articles used for food or drink for man or other animals, (2) chewing gum, and (3) articles used for components of any such article.”
“(2)(g)(1) – The term “drug” means (A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopoeia, official Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals…“
“(d) Animal – The term“animal” means all vertebrate and invertebrate species, including but not limited to man and other mammals, birds, fish, and shellfish.”
—21 U.S. Code § 321 – Definitions; generally
—15 U.S. Code § 55 – Additional definitions —7 US Code § 136 – Definitions
—=—
These definitions are clearly defining man as animal, as equal to “other animals.” Not man, but man-kind, as hu-man beings. Adam… meaning the fallen man or hu-man. In other words, we are considered as mere soulless beasts of burden by these lawmakers of the nobility and majesty of the god corporation (We, the People as a singular entity/voice). This concept of lowering common men in rank and status has been at the center of debate before even Plato, and is what amounts to institutional slavery (voluntary servitude).
What status (persona) is a public citizenship? Well, what is it that separates the human animal from the mammal, the reptile, and the crustacean? The answer to this question, in man’s written law, has no moral Source. The answer, my fellow educated mass of illiterates, is purely one of legal status (person-hood) in fiction. It is them, the self-aggrandized nobility of blood, against us. One cannot be a god without subjecting all others to being a lesser animal. And the best way to accomplish this is to educate men that citizenship raises ones status in society instead of lowering it. Nations, by definition, are the domain of the goyim. For the law of legalism is as well but a scheme by its creators, a conspiracy of the pretended legal gods.
To be clear, the opposite of the word scheme is truth, or a truism. Public (free) education is of course a scheme designed to create workers, not thinkers. It’s just that we are never told that the legal definition for the word “free” is a franchise. To be free in a nation (district) is to have liberty in an open-air debtor’s prison (the public) to pursue ones own course, as long as the organized criminal government gets its cut (tail). We receive a franchise education, and it is certainly paid for through forced taxation (extortion such as property tax). Everything becomes clear when the actual legal (fictional) meaning and intent of words is discovered and correctly applied. My own and your own personal opinion means nothing, for you we are simply not the creator of this legal system or the terms of its language (terms of art). You are but a user, a citizen (subject), and it (they) your master. Never forget this legal maxim of law, that protection requires subjection, and that the creator of anything controls and defines that thing and the law that controls it. The user of another’s property (persona/legal status) is bound to the creator of and thus lawmaker of that property. A citizenship belongs to government. The user of that citizen-ship is using the property of government, like renting a car (vessel), in order to conduct commercial activity and carry insurance therein. The law is attached only to the person, causing the man bearing (carrying) that mask (public persona) to then perform under that law in person (mask). This is called bond and surety.
To be clear, no member of any pension scheme (municipal corporation) owns the money or equal investment device (stock, bond) in any pension fund. Whatever money was contributed was severed from the person at that point of voluntarily contribution. A contribution is a gift, not an investment. The pension fund accepts the gift and then invests it, offering a reward for such stupid behavior so as to entice one into the scheme, like cheese for a rat into the pension cage, making ultimately impossible promises of future prosperity and wealth.
So what is a contribution?
Well, the root of this word is TRIBUTE!
CONTRIBUTE – To lend assistance or aid,or give something, to a common purpose; to have a share in any act or effect; to discharge a joint obligation. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
The synonyms for the word contribution are gift, donation, and offering. So tell me, what do you think your contribution is? When you donate to a political party, do you then have property in that party? NO! When you make an offering in church, do you then have property in that church? NO! When you give a gift at Christmas or on a birthday, do you do so with the intent of keeping any ownership in that gift? NO! So then, when you contribute to a pension fund, what in the hell makes you think you have property or equity in that fund?
Now perhaps you can see the value of a public education… not so much for your own self, but as a benefit for these schemers in the organized criminal government that keep you ignorant through a lack of such knowledge, information, and moral checks and balances?
Botom line: you’ve been tricked. What you have given to pension funds is not yours. And so whatever benefits you receive can disappear at any time. This is the nature of contributory membership. The church, the political party, and the pension fund can close its doors to you at any time with a simple declaration of municipal bankruptcy.
But we are getting ahead of ourselves…
In this expose’ we shall now examine the particular truths about the scheme we call as public pension funds. To do this, many aspects of law and government must obviously also be examined. For this, we must face not only the harsh facts about pensions and their not-so-hidden intent, but as well we must reveal the most uncomfortable self-evident truths about ourselves, both individually and as a collective, ignorant hoard ripe for the raping and pillaging of our posterity, prosperity, and abundance.
To know thyself is to know thy own worst enemy.
And so we begin…
—
–=– CAFR’s, CalPERS, And The Great Political Lie Machine –=–
—
Nothing disturbs a primary researcher like myself more than when so-called mainstream and alternative “news” outlets report quotes and so-called “facts” without verifying their veracity, or for that matter even bothering to comparatively vet them at all to any primary source. Such irresponsible reporting in an open, public fashion is exactly what Mr. Galbraith warns us about above, causing the simple and verifiable truth to be disguised by rhetoric. A lie well placed can do wonders in the promotion of public illiteracy towards government and its financial schemes.
There exists today, despite my own exhaustive efforts and documentary research, a strangely apparent and seemingly willing denial of the audited information located and easily accessible in the CalPERS pension fund Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) published each fiscal year, and for that matter the same audited report disclosing all government agencies and municipal corporations (cities, counties, districts, states, federal, pension funds, etc.) in their financial standing. All governments and independent agencies of government everywhere are required to complete a CAFR, which shows not only the yearly budget (income/outcome balance) as the more common annual budget report does, but as well all investments and extranious funding for each specific government since its inception — since any government was first municipally incorporated. If the yearly budget report were only the accounting report of the checking account of each government, the CAFR would comparatively be the total or “comprehensive” reporting of the checking, savings, investment portfolio, and any and every other asset not necessarily shown on the budget report. To purposefully ignore the CAFR when speaking of anything regarding the financial markets worldwide is like Helen Keller trying to describe an elephant she can’t touch, see, or hear. Without even a basic understanding of the CAFR accounting system, especially in public pension funds, no one can possibly comprehend the rational behind the purposeful fluctuation and seemingly out-of-control stock market in any way (as ordered chaos), since government is the main investor and thus proxy shareholder voter in all corporations through control of domestic and international equities, mutual funds, mortgage-backed securities, bonds, foreign currencies, precious metals, real estate and real estate investment funds (REITs), bundled debt instruments and loans, and other toxic-debt-type financial “products” of these financial markets and of their own making. To exclude the CAFR from any and all reporting whatsoever about the commercial, governmental, and financial world, the CAFR being the audited financial statements of all corporations including all governments, equates to a blatant, blanket lack of vetting and verification of any and all information emanating from any source, news agency, or other propagandist. Its not just bad reporting, it’s patent laziness and profound, often purposeful ignorance.
Case in point… I was sent a recent link (below) to just that type of irresponsible reporting. As expected, none of the quoted “facts” presented by the CalPERS board member and propagandist were fact-checked. No sign of the CAFR (audit) was presented or referenced in any way, though the subject of that publicly disclosed information can be found easily in the CAFR, which completely debunks those callous, legally protected public lies presented as political “facts.”
Unfortunately, the fear porn industry is alive and well, especially when it comes to finance and public/private pensions. You can’t scare the public with the truth about this global pension scheme, for the truth reveals nothing but massive profits and gains within public pensions. In order to first hide and then legally exact more money for governments’ massive, combined, globalist investment schemes, it takes everything but the truth according to the audited source, including political punditry and pandering. Fear missed with ignorance of facts is the only trick that creates this kind of wind funnel designed for the “legally” extortive strip-funding of the taxpayer base fed into this global pension fund scheme.
From a recent “report” by ZeroHedge.com entitled “CalPERS Is Near Insolvency; It Needs A Bailout Soon” – Former Board Member Makes Stunning Admission“ we get a first hand look at just such second-hand reporting. Even the title is full of anticipation and dread — a real click-baited eye-catcher! And this type of reporting is the perfect example of why you should never trust a politicians’ public rhetoric when his federally required, independent audit is so readily available to expose his blatant lies. And this is the perfect example of why the CAFR is never discussed and never utilized by such armchair reporters, and certainly rarely if never referred to publicly by any politician. Audits are boring, complete, neutral, and without emotion or much speculation. They state the facts with blatant, required accuracy required by law. So why would anyone bother fact-checking their spin-jobs in such a proper fashion?
Well that’s what I do. Call me crazy… or just a bore. Anal? Fine. But I gotta know the truth at all costs!
Now, this statement shouldn’t lead one to assume that one should ever trust a politician or attorney in any situation, that is, in any public situation. Go to the source — the audit, not the puppet mouth-piece. The source is what is required by the highest legal authority under oath, as written in the federal law, which is the CAFR (audit) and only the CAFR. One only need do a token bit of research to discover that, while lying to congress or any government agency or administrative court“under oath“is a punishable crime of perjury,lying to the public is no crime at all! So a fund manager for the largest pension fund in the United States, for instance, can say anything he wants about the fund he manages and represents, as long as he is not “under oath” to tell the “truth” about his fictional accounting numbers — say, like to some self-proclaimed reporter or when “tweeting” on Twitter. All the public forums are a stage, and the stage is where actors and magicians go to perform their lies and illusions under the illusion of prestige.
PRESTIGES – noun – [Latin proestigioe.] Juggling tricks; impostures.(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
PRESTIGIATION – noun – [Latin proestigioe, tricks.] The playing of legerdemain tricks;a juggling. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
PRESTIGIATOR – noun – A juggler; a cheat.(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
PRESTIGIATORY – adjective – Juggling; consisting of impostures.(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
PRESTIGIOUS – adjective – Practicing tricks;juggling. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
IMPOSTURE – noun – [Latin impostura. See Impose.] Deception practiced under a false or assumed character;fraud or imposition practiced by a false pretender. –Form new legends, And fill the world with follies and impostures. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
LEGERDEMAIN – noun – [See Light.] Slight of hand; a deceptive performance which depends on dexterity of hand; a trick performed with such art and adroitness, that the manner or art eludes observation. The word is sometimes used adjectively; as a legerdemain trick. (Webs1828)
–=–
Yes, universities are ranked by prestige, and so is the papacy. But then so are doctors, lawyers, judges, congressmen, and presidents. And lets not forget actors (professional, paid liars), say, like Ronald Reagan, actor and spokesmodel extraordinaire!
—=—
“I’m sending Chesterfields to all my friends, that’s the merriest Christmas any smoker can have—Chesterfield mildness plus no unpleasant after taste – Ronald Reagan.”
—Excerpt from a 1940’s magazine advertisement for ‘Chesterfield’ brand cigarettes, including a picture of a young Mr. Reagan employed to smoke a cigarette as he writes his Christmas cards with a huge smile on his face as he sells smokable chemical poisons.
—=—
But presidents aren’t just actors, are they? Wake up, man… even George Jr. was a fantastic and intelligent orator and debater before acting as the lame-brain president we were tricked into believing:
Holy crap, Batman! Bush speaks normal.
–=–
The CAFR report is submitted to government under a prestigious oath by its employees and the verified (audited) by independent auditing firms, which in all cases will be charged with the serious crime of defrauding the federal government if they knowingly and inaccurately report their financial position and holdings. A politician, on the other hand, while speaking publicly, to a reporter, or to the public at large and thus not “under oath,” can basically lie through his fake, perma-smile teeth until the cows come home (whatever that means). And so the purposeful, occultist (secretiveness) obfuscation (silence) and confusion (lies) put forward in the public about the audited, verified information within the CAFR will never be part of the typical politicians’ rhetoric, either on or off the public stage. There is no law that requires that “truth” be told to the general public, and there’s no court that will charge anyone for lying to the public, including every news agency out there, unless it causes some consequence or harm. That harmful consequence, though, doesn’t include the incredible profits and gains governments created for their organized criminal activity. For Mr. Bush, there is certainly no law preventing him from acting like an idiot while being quite the opposite, a wolf in sheeps’ clothing.
–=–
The original Coat of Arms of the Fabian Society, a wolf in sheeps’ clothing
–=–
This is not to say there aren’t problems with the CAFR when considering its difficult-to-read, highly specialized, coveted terms of art. It is only to say that, like any other field or profession of expertise, anyone that learns the art in order to spot those problems by studying the accounting language they are written in, which we can call collectively as the “creative accounting” non-governmental, private practices that are legalized and required only for government corporations under permissive licensure, will most certainly find what one seeks. The simple reality is that the CAFR, like the UCC, the stock market, and so many other commercialized and centralized systems, were not created for or to benefit the average, common citizen (goyim). They aren’t meant to be read by the public, though required to be publicly available for the one in a million that actually do read it. In fact it’s quite the opposite. Government agents and bankers play by different rules than the public citizenry. And so to pretend knowledge of government finance, the stock market, or for that matter any and everything governmentally regulated without learning to read its audited financial statements and the terms of art they are written in is like playing the game of Monopoly without knowing the rules, the player pieces (agentic avatars), or what the fake-money (an oxymoron) is worth. To then predict its future happenstance… well that is nothing but a purist form of sophism – the prediction of fictional events! And this describes just about every source for “news” and “speculation” out there, including this one.
WORDS (TERMS) OF ART – The vocabulary or terminology of a particular art or science, and especially those expressions which are idiomatic orpeculiar to it.(Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
For accountants in government and in private corporations, the main rule of the game is quite basic: simply hide any assets behind any and all possible and even faked liabilities. To be more exact, the goal of the game is to hide any current assets as to their current monetary valuation by comparing them (balancing their numbers) to imaginarily predicted future actuarial debt amortization schedules with no foundation in reality. And what if they can’t find any liabilities? Easy-peasy, just make some up. Start a new investment fund, say for a possible future bridge to be built, that you have no intention of using the funds for it building, and then just transfer the value to another investment fund ten years later after collecting millions or billions. There are many, many ways to cheat with legerdemain trickery and juggling of monetary valuation the unwitting, ignorant public through non-governmental schemes.
Now, to get started here, let’s first read the stated quotes and commentary utilized in this stylized fear-porn reporting job posted on ZeroHedge.com, so that we may then discover the repeated and unchecked lies provided by quite simply looking them up to verify their veracity in the CAFR for CalPERS (or any other local or national government municipal corporation, agency, district, or pension fund). Remember, the CAFR is the AUDIT of every incorporated government entity out there, no matter how big or how small, no matter where it is located, and is a requirement of congress as federal law to be accurate under penalty of perjury. That’s every city, county, state, district, and pension in legal, corporate existence. They can’t lie in this singular case, and that makes the CAFR the biggest open secret of these organized criminals in government. Be mindful that the majority of city council and other common political persons are unaware of what is in the very CAFR (Audit) they vote to pass each year. They have unelected accountants and city managers for that. The councils are just yes-men, often completely ignorant of what they actually vote for.
And yes, by the way, the CAFR of the Federal Reserve is the official and federally required audit of the Federal Reserve, and quite easy to find. The entire End The Fed and Audit The Fed mythos is built on what appears to be nothing more than a purposeful, shared set of lies and ignorance of its CAFR (audit) and of the law that created and maintains it, which has been reported and publicly published and easily accessible for many decades. Omission of fact, and worse, the purposeful ignorance and thus omission of this legally required and easily accessible source of fact that is the audit, is to this author the greatest of journalistic crimes. The blind trust put into politicians like pork-master Ron Paul, who never revealed in any substantial way the official AUDIT of the Fed, in the form of the CAFR, is a perfect example of how lying, and especially omission of the most relevant fact, is rampant and effective, causing good people to become activists trying to achieve pointlessly what is already required by law, an audit (CAFR) of the Fed. To this author, this is just a perfection of “alternative” mass mind control.
Here is a link to the CAFRs (audits) for the Federal Reserve Board and Banks.
Please note that the Fed even lists this report on the Federal Reserve Board website link above as the “audited annual financial statements,” another common name for the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report [CAFR]. And yes, everything you are told by that Audit and End the Fed movement that apparently isn’t audited is plainly reported in the CAFR (audit), as required by federal Law. It’s even on a Fed webpage called “Audit.” This is where the insert of a “LOL” would be well-deserved, but then I’d be laughing at my former, foolish self and any other fool that has been caught up in such frivolous, pointless activism against something that isn’t even true, without doing research into my own borrowed, blankly parroted opinion.
Here’s the congressional law requiring the audited CAFR:
Please take notice of the title of this quite old, already existing code: “31 U.S. Code § 714 – AUDIT of Financial Institutions Examination Council,Federal Reserve Board, Federal reserve banks,Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,and Office of Comptroller of the Currency.” Also notice that this audit, of course, goes straight to the hands of Congress, meaning that Congress is fully aware and in control of everything the Federal Reserve is doing. But they will do anything to cause you to think they have no control over their own created corporations, including, you guessed it, lie directly to and confuse the public, which is perfectly legal and in the best interest of such state secrets. A government is nothing without its secrets and the appointed (not voted for) state and other federal Department secret-aries that keep them.
Listed below are my own depths of primary, sourced research articles about the Fed, serving as both a correction and a heavy criticism upon all who continue to parrot such nonsense for no other reason than the peer pressure of its shock-jock popularity.
Yes, you’ve been lied to by omission this whole time, by the likes of Ron Paul, Alex Jones, G. Edward Griffen, and collectively anyone else that is a false prophet or believer in and supports the End The Fed and Audit The Fed campaigns. Many of the quotes you’ve been hungrily fed to support your unfounded, unsourced mindset, including my own, surrounding the Federal Reserve and its creation through radio, poorly researched documentaries, and from badly, secondarily-sourced books are provably false. The lies are passed from one documentary source to the next, solidifying the lie into the public-minded and yes “alternative” consciousness, where celebrity is used in replacement of vetted reliability. You’ve thus been led to unwittingly lie to yourself and others as false-prophet-activists! Why? Because it is no crime to lie to the public, especially when it happens to be in the best interest of protecting Congress from taking the blame for the actions of the elitist, organized criminal corporations and independent boards it creates, like the Federal Reserve System, of which congress has total control over as its lawmaker, as a congressional incorporate creation. The lie is so powerful that the reader might even now find him or her self actually defending the lie, defending what the programed perception of the Fed is instead of fact-checking ones own beliefs with primary instead of secondary and word-of-mouth sources. And so just as it was in the early 1900s, as the stock market was sucked dry (crashed) by profiteers (government pirates) while being blamed on bad banking practices, the Fed is being used just as then to be the pretended bad guy, the apparently out-of-control banking industry head that is the main cause of the artificial market and its inevitable downturn. And the supposed evil Fed will be blamed instead of those profiteers behind it, just as it was when Mr. Lindbergh was quoted from above — before the central bank was once again recreated after its previous defeat to control the then out-of-control banking industry. Now we have controlled, organized crime instead of just that common, individual crime networks (gangs). The crime of usury was nationalized, and all members get a cut.
In fact, congress even passed its own law over itself limiting its own ability in public congressional forums and inquiries only (but not private/closed ones) from questioning the Fed director, so that no information would be disclosed to the public in public forums, and so that the illusion of natural “independence,” as quasi-sovereign privacy, political separation, and even competition in government could be maintained, as if the congress (the gods/lawmakers of the United States) somehow does not have control over its own creation. More sophistry. Lie after lie after lie… and it works still to this day, despite my own continuous exposure of the 100% required CAFR auditing system by all government entities and agencies, including the Fed and its board and banks.
But I digress, for all these proofs are in my former research articles listed above.
Today, while fear excites and sells…
The boring but piercing truth sleeps. The fear-killer that the CAFR is simply cannot be used to foment misinformation and crime, for it disproves the tactics used to cause that fear.
Why this particular website (ZeroHedge.com) is even referred to as an alternative news site is unclear, since it seems to merely be “predicting” the future by suckling from the creamy mainstream rags and political propaganda we can all get at any Piggly Wiggly or television station, and then saying I told you so… For instance, the state-wide mainstream newspaper The Sacramento Bee also recently reported:
California public pension shortfall one of nation’s largest
BY DAN WALTERS
May 02, 2017 05:10 PM (Updated May 03, 2017 07:50 AM)
Throughout California, local government and school district officials are writing new budgets and confronting rapidly rising costs of pensions.
Many have seen their costs double in the last few years, largely consuming revenue increases that the state’s expanding economy have produced. For instance, a projected $1 billion increase in school districts’ teacher pension costs in 2017-18 will more than equal projected revenue gains.
However, as the old rock song says, “You ain’t seen nothing yet.”…
Yes, I’ll take the Fear-Blue-Plate-Dinner special with a side of irrational predictive programming scariness, please. Oh, and on the side, could you provide no supporting or counter-evidence please? Audits just ruins the taste of a good piece of fear.
But is it true? Or rather, are the facts behind all of this true or even provided? For like everyone else, it seems the Sacramento Bee does not report on the CAFR audit to the public. I was informed long ago by Walter Burien at CAFR1.com that all the major news agencies are fully aware of the CAFR, but are required to keep the open secret at the highest levels when it comes to this type of reporting – that is, the long con, the big non-governmental taxpayer investment and pension fund scheme. Why? Because government is the main investor, voter, and regulator of the media, of course! Thus, it is rare that one might find such audited information that completely counters such blatantly one-sided reporting. And of course the lies have that infamous trickle down effect, bleeding into all of the alternative sources out there. And in the end, it turns out not one agency, news outlet, or armchair blogger has actually checked the only required-to-be-credible source — the audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR).
Thus web trafic is increased, as is advertising. It’s like watching moths nosedive wide-eyed and entranced into a flame. People pay money to be scared in the movie theatre, and apparently it’s the same with their news source. Everyone screws everyone in their own subtle way, not merely carrying the lies but spinning them to suit the needs of their particular platform and commercial (capitalist) sales model. Lying is legal. Who needs morals? For the art of the lie is the very foundational nature of a capitalist (value per head) government and those in its citizenry hopelessly caught up by its corruption and greed.
From the absolutely unverified and un-vetted ZeroHedge.com report we read the following quotes:
“The pension crisis is inching closer by the day. @CalPERS just voted to increase the amount cities must pay to the agency. Cities point to possible insolvency if payments keep rising but CalPERS is near insolvency itself.It may be reform or bailout soon.http://ow.ly/CQGw30iyLko“
–=–
The preceding tagline for this tweet as a commentary by ZeroHedge.com states:
“…having reported over and over and over (and over, and over) again that public pensions are in deep trouble, two days ago none other than Steve Westly, former California controller and Calpers board member – manager of the largest public pension fund in the US, made a stunning admission, confirming everything…“
–=–
This is obviously and admittedly not the first time such fear tactics have been reported by ZeroHedge.com about the so-called “public pension crisis” while calling it as news. It continuously pretends to be in the know while in fact knowing nothing but what other news outlets, politicians, and market analysts publicly report (lie) and tweet. Round and round the parrots repeat each other, spinning their opinions while imagining their own not-at-all uniquely re-reported perspectives are somehow actually to each their own original analysis, just as the bird in a cage fallaciously squaks “hello” over and over without any substance or experiential knowledge of what that term actually means. This type of reporting is akin to a see, I told you so mentality, reporting over and over the glib and often false or even planned predictions that others make, in order to put forward the illusion of ones own newsworthy correctness over that which is not at all demonstrable or predictable.
If I say it will happen in the future because other “experts” do, then chances are it will, at least in some inevitable form or the other and in an unlimited time period, and I can then say I told you so… This is the same reason one might invest in the stock market, because Warren Buffet says I should. Of course this only benefits those already invested, driving up the price of the stock in the short term as the public lemmings emulate their false financial gods.
Predicting an up or down boom in these volatile financial markets sometime in the future is like predicting a politician will lie to the public. It’s a self-evident certainty, and ultimately just a matter of time… Of course it will crash, dummy! Of course it will rise, idiot! For these are the only two possible options that can actually happen! And so by predicting both will eventually happen, one really can’t lose. It’s like predicting the sun will rise. And so another false guru is thrust on the unwitting public telling us so.
But therein lies the very heart of the game…
You see, they bet against it before it gains or crashes. They cover their bets, their options, and they reinsure what they already have insured. They can’t loose, man! The market must go artificially up so that it can then be brought artificially down. The lemon must grow to ripeness before it can be squeezed to make lemonade and the seed replanted for the next squeeze. This is basic organized crime 101. There is no right or wrong prediction. It’s a continuum; a fractal without totality, without sum, a cancer that keeps growing and being cut back down ad infinity. But more importantly… it’s without (outside of/opposed to) Reality. Super-natural. It’s fiction. And in any fiction, the artist (creator) creates the future, not the neutral randomness of Nature, and certainly not those reporting on its history.
For those that don’t quite understand the basic con game of reinsurance and its various forms, let me give you a generic example of what happens behind the scenes:
In the U.S. (or any nation) I (through government) legally collect taxpayer money (or other capital from any and all willing, ignorant suckers) by incrementally placing taxpayer money into a public investment fund.
When I reach $10 million in my local or state investment fund, it is now time to “legally” steal that money from the public.
I now open a dummy corporation in Zimbabwe, where I place $10 million in capital.
Back in the US, my $10 million of taxpayer money is enterprise fund (non-governmentally) invested in or “bet” on a certain stock or portfolio thereof in the similarly performing stocks.
I, of course, have inside knowledge (or create it) that the stock market or certain sectors thereof will take a nosedive or “crash” soon, as planned. And so its time to extract the excess wealth from these now purposefully over-priced companies.
I then invest that $10 million from my obscure, unreported dummy corporation in Africa into the American stock market. But I bet against(via put options)the same stock I invested public funds in back home, just like they bet against airline stocks for the day of 9/11/2001 with apparent pre-knowledge of the “event.”
The market crashes, just as I fully expected and have planned (insured and reinsured) for.
I lose $10 million of my governmental taxpayer fund balance in the United States, and look to the taxpayers to bail out my apparent mistake, pretending (lying to the public about) a total loss, and may even have the gall to ask for bailouts or bonds (government sponsored loans) to cover it.
But at the same time I gain that same $10 million (or much more) in Zimbabwe, and cash out.
In the market itself, nothing looks suspicious. Just business as usual, where a few win, most lose. Some, however, play both sides. The loser always pays the winner.
I launder and convert my holdings, pay my accomplish in Africa the value of $1 million under the table, and simply close that dummy corporation so it cannot be traced back to me. And no one in the idiocracy of the public, taxpayer base is ever the wiser. The balance has not changed. One bet pays another. The criminals protect each others private prospects. This is merely a laundering of money from the taxpayer base into an offshore account, done within the appearance of (de facto) “illegitimately legal” legitimacy using this organized criminal platform called the worldwide stock markets. What is constantly exacted as investment-based and other losses from these public funds is constantly being gained somewhere else. It’s a quite basic, completely legal con job.
And this is why our incestuous, nepotistic congressmen within their familial accomplices (the People) have vacation homes and investment properties all over the world, sitting arrogantly on each other’s boards and laughing all the way to their offshore banks.
–=–
On a micro/macro-cosmic scale, this same model is the basis for both the wealth of the organized criminals calling themselves as a de facto (illegitimate/militarized) “government” in pretended legitimacy compared to the absolutely controlled poverty level (called “welfare”) of the common class. If I insure one thing I reinsure it in the background. In other words, I insure against the insurance, betting against what the original policy or other investment pays out for. Thus disaster or no disaster, I am covered and will come out ahead, especially if I can cause the law to require and sanction taxpayer funding of one of my bets and coverage (bailout) of any losses. For the financially illiterate goyim, as the limited common citizenry, there is only the gamble of insurance or no insurance. Yes or no. But for this upper class, all bets are covered. There is no easier way to explain this. But this is also why there is no easy way to explain the ups and downs of all financial markets, for we are not allowed to see their game-plans, their blueprints for the continual, perpetual destruction and rebuilding of their own artificial markets. They care not the value of corporate stock, only that they have the majority and thus control of it and the company it represents. They and their corporate funders are the beneficiaries of the financial phoenix they create and recreate as it burns and is reborn with every click of the market ticker and every computer-generated, purposeful flaw they take precise advantage of through techniques in arbitrage.
ARBITRAGE – Transactions of bankers and mercantile houses by which stocks or bills are bought in one market and sold in another for the sake of the profit arisirg from a difference in price in the two markets.(–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
Why do pension funds and government investment funds hold so much in all foreign currencies traded on all different (foreign) markets/exchanges? Because of arbitrage, a constant buying and selling so as to capitalize upon the continuous, minuscule mistakes in pricing from exchange to exchange. Of course high-speed computers are set up to catch every single mistake as it happens, as what is ultimately missed by human disadvantage. The action of an arbitrage exchange can happen in a 10th of a second, multiple times — beyond what the human eye could possibly track.
They buy yen for one dollar on one exchange and sell it at the same time on another foreign exchange for $1.01 before the two exchanges have registered the change, and they can do this all day and all night long in various 24 hour time zones. Sound illegal? Remember, it’s government taking advantage of these little cheats.
Who ya gonna call?
While we watch that impressively complicated shit-storm, distracted by the volatile and fiery inferno of constant market activity that upon appearance means nothing to us, they are profiting from every change in market valuation. The magicians, the illusionists always work by the art of distraction, keeping their audience the fools and stranding them behind their own wonder and awe, amazed by their own ignorance of what lies behind each trick and yet utterly confident that something just ain’t right here. Yet still we need to believe it’s all real, even legitimate, and not just the long-con Ponzi scheme it always has been…
But what we do have access to out here in la-la land is the CAFR. We can see what they did after the fact each year and on a continuing basis. This audited report is a thorn in their side, of course, and yet their collective crimes cannot be “organized” without it. It is a necessary evil, or necessary good, depending on whose hands it gets in to. In my hands, for instance, the CAFR is their Achilles Heel, the shining light to their projections of darkness through lies. The CARF simply cannot be denied, though they certainly try. It can, however, be ignored and made publicly invisible by simply never referring to it in any public forum, including congress. For the CAFR is the great false mystery that is the holy grail of government accounting; that metaphoric, governmental fountain of youth (rejuvenation) that are these collective, extortive investment funds kept out of the public spotlight.
Let’s read from this latest CAFR, for instance, about how CalPERS invests, holds, and profits from one of the most toxic debt instruments ever invented:
7. DERIVATIVES
“CalPERS holds investments in swaps, options, futures, rights, and warrantsand enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts… The fair value of international currency forwards represents the unrealized gain or loss on the related contracts, which is calculated as the difference between the contract exchange rate and the exchange rate at the end of the reporting period.”
–=–
Do pensioners care what their governmental or private pension fund invests in? Well, I cannot in good conscious venture to guess what this group of dependents on state and federal welfare for the middle class personally care or don’t care about. However, in appearance, it seems that as long as their extortion and usury-based retirement checks keep coming in, they certainly appear to not have a care in the world just what their collective contributions are invested in, let alone the resulting globalist control or illegal, permanent state of occupational world war it causes. Hell, most have no idea where to even find the list of corporations and holdings invested in! Many have never even logged in to the CalPERS website, let alone contemplated that their own retirement payments necessarily represent nothing but mass profiteering and pirating from the worst of the worst companies from around the world, as well as the debt of most of their fellow citizens. They have no idea they are handing the entire control structure of corporations around the world to government.
I invite you, the “pensioner,” and you, the “taxpayer,” to pull up this investment holdings report for CalPERS, with the understanding that this is just one of many thousands of such pension investment funds worldwide. Look at the stock holdings and the market values, and allow yourself to grasp the importance of being the collective holder of so many shares of stock in any and all substantial corporations around the world. Imagine the power of being the main shareholder through collective bargaining and proxy voting, while at the same time being the government, lawmaker, and regulator (and de-regulator) of all corporations, having the ability to ruin any rogue, moral, uncooperative company in the world.
One cannot imagine the scope and size of this organized criminal network until this particular report is seen for oneself. Look up the worst corporation imaginable and it is there. Look up the main banks, investment firms, and corporations in communist China and other supposedly “enemy” countries, and there you will find massive, controlling, United States and other globalist government pension and other organized fund investments. Like it or not, this applies to all of us, for whether you are a pensioner or a taxpayer or both, you individually are equally complicit in this self-destructive, globalist scheme. Ignorance is no excuse. If you do not look, you will never believe that you have been played as the fool. If you are a pensioner and do not look, you will never contemplate just how much your own false piece of mind in such a false sense of security as this retirement scheme in mammon has caused the entire world population. You will never imagine your benefits are gained solely at the expense of everyone else in the world, let alone your fellow majority of extorted taxpaying citizens. And you will never understand just how this monstrous, monopolistic, corporate world governance structure came into power as it has.
Seriously… do a search in this report for the word China. You think America imports cheap Chinese crap from just Chinese companies? Well, I have news for you sunshine… those corporations in China were built with American investment capital from such investment funds as your own. The proof is undeniable, listed right here in this investment holdings report:
Where do you buy food? Governments own the majority share of its corporate stock and by collective shareholder proxy votes for its board of directors, etc.
Where do you buy clothes? Governments own the majority share of its corporate stock and by collective shareholder proxy votes for its board of directors, etc.
Where do you bank, get gas, and what television news, magazines, and newspapers do you subscribe to? Governments own the majority share of their corporate stock and by collective shareholder proxy votes for its board of directors, etc.
Of course the board of directors of each corporation elects the CEO and other officers, in accordance to what government collectively desires. After all, the board does the shareholders’ bidding, and its even the government’s law regarding these for profit corporations that that corporation’s board must make profits and gains for the shareholders (governments) its top goal.
Again, no corporation owns government, as the empty rhetoric of propagandists and alternative newsie parrots have been conditioned to believe. By law, and by evidence of stock certificates and participation in mutual fund activities, government provably owns shares in all corporations and expresses its will through proxy shareholder voting, and this cannot be disputed.
In fact, there is a whole section of the CAFR and the website for CalPERS devoted to its activities in “corporate governance,” the general term used to describe such governance of corporations through stockholder voting, or in this case, governmental agency stock-holders.
From the CalPERS website we read (links active):
Proxy Voting
As a long-term shareowner, CalPERS sees voting our proxies as the primary way we can influence a company’s operations and corporate governance. This is why it’s important for shareowners to vote and make their decisions based on a full understanding of publicly available information.
CalPERS also publishes additional voting information for high profile votes and company-specific shareowner campaigns. Visit Key Decisions for additional details. All votes are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.
Note that CalPERS admits here to being a “long-term” shareholder and voter of its invested in corporations. Yet it openly obfuscates this fact when reporting on bad years in the stock market, as if the yearly performance of a stock or portfolio thereof is somehow its infinite state of valuation, as if one year accounts for the past or next 50 years of performance while that stock is held in the long-term. More trickery… for what goes up will come down, and what goes down will go up again. But oh the propaganda and falsified taxpayer bailouts they can create in between.
When we take a photo on vacation, do we believe somehow that this single snapshot is the entirety of our experience, or do we consider the whole vacation before we assign such a valuation? The snapshot is the budget, while the whole vacation experience, with all its ups and downs, is the CAFR. A budget report is like the accountant’s voluntary, monetary alzheimer’s disease. Selective statistics are used to prevent accurate information in the yearly budget alone.
To be clear, all bad news that these accounting magicians report to the public is always of the short-term or budgetary (yearly), but never of the long-term or comprehensive (from inception). This is the essence of word magic, the delusion of creative accounting at its best. The temporary, short-term results can always be used to hide the long-term Truth by omission of long-term facts and totals, or by simply hiding those long-term results from the public discourse, from the yearly budget. And this is especially the greatest difference between the budget report and the CAFR. There is no hiding anything in the CAFR, for all assets must be reported, even if that reporting standard is done so in what I call creative accounting language. As with any commercial art, one must learn the language, the terms of art, and accounting tricks before one may fully grasp the scheme. And it is perhaps this fact alone, the lack of proper use and understanding of terms of art, that wholly disqualifies just about all reporters and alternative websites on the planet. Public ignorance of the accounting and legal languages is key to success.
One never teaches ones slaves ones private language, lest the slave become equal with the master, for words are the only chains that bond us in surety.
Here we read that CalPERS uses “global proxy voting activity” to “influence a company’s operations and corporate governance…” In other words, this is the definition of global governance. Globalism – the Order in the New World of centrally controlled, fictional finance.
Can you dig?
In fact, I here and now defy you to find a public corporation not listed as a government-held US or international equity on this report! Maybe then you may begin to comprehend just how the world of finance and corporate governance actually works — besides what those government owned news outlets publicly report to you. Maybe you’ll get why the practice of usury (interest) and grocery (retail) is so accepted and protected by government, for the profiteer is after all always government and those who suck upon its teat the hardest. After all, and as we will discuss in a moment, government is also the largest holder of toxic debt instruments and loans. Debt, it turns out, is one of the most profitable investments one can make! Investing in debt is how billionaires are generally made. And yes, these are also listed in that asset holdings report, for debt is certainly an asset to the purchaser, and thus by proxy, the creditor.
CONTRACT SYSTEM – As applied to state prisons, this phrase signifies that the labor of the prisoners is utilized by private persons or contractors, who thus secure the profits of such labor.(–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
What happens when eventually, through these investment schemes, government purchases all our debts, both corporate and personal? Why debtor’s prisons, of course. For the lawmakers and their prescriptive legal laws can only become more corrupt as more and more industry is subsumed by the master corporation nation that are organized (united) national and world governments. As the main shareholder, it is in the best interest of government to pass laws allowing debtors to be imprisoned, as forced labor. As the regulator of corporations, which by law must make a profit for its shareholders (i.e. government), government must create ways to extort money from debtors that cannot pay their debts, and thus again debtor’s prisons are a logical solution. This is the purest construction of conflict of interest.
I was shocked to learn that the “Made In America” symbol is placed on products made in US prisons. And to me, nothing could be more telling of our societal and moral degradation and ignorance than that! But then again, the 13th Amendment to the US constitution did make “involuntary slavery” perfectly legal for punishment of crimes, so this would be the logical conclusion. Oh, and you thought it fired the slaves? LOL! It nationalized slavery in the form of the 14th Amendment citizen and allowed prisoners to be used as labor force. If that’s your idea of freedom then just shoot me now.
In any case, what we are most certainly witnessing today in the public sphere is the mass-induced fruition of such quotes and warnings as these:
–=–
“Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.“
–Martin Luther King, Jr.
–=–
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
―Søren Kierkegaard
–=–
“Real knowledge is to know the extent of one’s ignorance.“
–Confucius
–=–
“We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.”
―Benjamin Franklin
–=–
“Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.“
–Aldous Huxley
–=–
“Sometimes a man wants to be stupid if it lets him do a thing his cleverness forbids.”
–John Steinbeck
–=–
“The two pillars of ‘political correctness‘ are, a) willful ignorance, and b) a steadfast refusal to face the truth.“
–George MacDonald Fraser
–=–
“But you can’t make people listen.They have to come round in their own time, wondering what happened and why the world blew up around them. It can’t last.”
―Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451
–=–
“No drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of society. If we’re looking for the source of our troubles, we shouldn’t test people for drugs, we should test them for stupidity, ignorance, greed, and love of power.”
―P.J. O’Rourke
–=–
“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.”
―Isaac Asimov
–=–
“Any formal attack on ignorance is bound to fail because the masses are always ready to defend their most precious possession – their ignorance.”
―Hendrik Willem van Loon
–=–
“The vast majority of human beings dislike and even actually dread all notions with which they are not familiar… Hence it comes about that at their first appearance innovators have generally been persecuted, and always derided as fools and madmen.”
―Aldous Huxley
–=–
“Blind party loyalty will be our downfall. We must follow the truth wherever it leads.”
―DaShanne Stokes
–=–
“He didn’t believe that, surely.” “Of course not! But he had to pretend he did, as otherwise he would have had no choice but to be insulted. And since there would be nothing he could do about that, being insulted would only lead to humiliation. And since he didn’t want that, the simplest path to follow was to believe what I said.”
―Isaac Asimov, Foundation’s Edge
–=–
“The moral complexity of the situation had grown past his ability to process it, so he just relaxed in the warm glow of victory instead.”
―James S.A. Corey, Leviathan Wakes
–=–
“The more you can escape from how horrible things really are, the less it’s going to bother you…and then, the worse things get.”
―Frank Zappa
–=–
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
―Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead
–=–
“The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance – it is the illusion of knowledge.“
–Daniel J. Boorstin
–=–
“Willful ignorance and endless laws become the replacement for self-education and self-restraint,because ignorance and laws are easy.“
―Holly Lisle
–=–
“Five percent of the people think; ten percent of the people think they think; and the other eighty-five percent would rather die than think.”
―Thomas A. Edison
–=–
And so the armchair bloggers and digital alternative newsies call out in their illiterate, parroted spin with the type of arrogant ignorance only an unlearned conspiracy theorist could love. But in reality these are just useful idiots helping in the spread of these lying fear campaigns created by those seeking to spread such propaganda for their own benefit, turning the self-proclaimed “alternative” reporter into a valuable mouth-piece for the opposition, into a necessary tool (unwitting agent) for the accidental spread of perfected misinformation. Problem, reaction, solution.
And when the trigger is pulled, this cushioning effect of so many parroted reports and warnings about bankruptcy, insolvency, and the undefined “pension crisis” will allow these organized criminals in government to steal what was promised to the collectively foolish pensioners and taxpayers that voluntarily contributed to these funds in legal trust. The cushion of constant fear and threat in effect causes pitchforks, and for that matter guns, to remain locked up instead of used in revolt against such corruption in government. Like good, patriotic subjects of the state, the mass of middle class fools in their love of servitude will once again outweigh the loss of financial security in retirement once promised by the slave masters. The constant fear propaganda softens the blow, so that revolt or revolution appears to be too little, too late, even as the globalist government mafia laughs all the way to the bank. To live in fear and anticipation is to accept that which is feared and expected when its planned fruition commences. This is simple, Orwellian dystopia mixed with Bernaysian propaganda and public relations.
Ever asked why a government needs public relations? Why the military has commercials?
Ever considered that only that which keeps secrets, lies, and seeks to mislead or cheat the public would possibly need a public relations office?
One that tells the Truth relates the Truth at all times, and therefore needs no agency.
This insanity of an idiocracy seems to mirror the American and Italian propagandists in their support of the leftist social democrats, being labeled as quite “useful idiots” for their then blind support of foreign communism, while the similar term “useful innocents” was used by the Austrian-American economist Ludwig von Mises in his 1940’s pro-war book entitled Planned Chaos, a term that was used by communists for liberals, whom von Mises describes as “confused and misguided sympathizers.” In the end, such blind support and repeated spreading of these emotional and fear-driven public perceptions as political “facts” (legal fiction), though they are easily provable lies, ends up helping the organized criminals cause instead of harming it. And after so many years of being in the middle of this cornucopia of “alternative news” armchair reporters and disinformation websites and radio networks, some innocent and some not so innocent, this spreading of lies seems to be the entire unintended, oppositionally-controlled purpose and certainly the result of the so-called alternative truth movements. We ultimately and without reason serve to expose without any consequence whatsoever of that exposure, except to further excite false information and reveal public actors as agent provocateur personalities as if they are the actual players behind the crimes. We then say simply, I told you so… No one gets busted because no truth, no secrets are being reported to the organized criminals in government. Only lies are given, which are then imagined to be facts by that public, alternative or mainstream. And so we all end up believing this is exactly what was supposed to happen, no matter how obviously criminal its design.
Again, the “truth” about the Fed is the perfect example — so many empty lies that with just a token bit of research are destroyed as patriotic myths designed to re-direct blame away from the legislative gods (creators/lawmakers) of all governmental agencies, corporations, and banks, which is the “United States” corporation Congress (a de facto board of directors).
This alternative network of ineffective reporting is like solving a Rubick’s Cube. One solves the puzzle and puts the pieces together in a pattern, only to realize later that there are 5 other sides to solve at the same time. And when one correctly, finally puts all those sides together, one realizes that there now sits a solved puzzle, one which serves no purpose except in its perfect representation of a perfectly played out plan. When all sides are seen, then one may finally see that what was apparently broken or out of order wasn’t broken at all, but is instead a well-oiled and perfectly operating machine. In governments case, as the premier purveyor of police and military protected, organized crime, the ability to read the CAFR through all its creative accounting and terms of art is like solving that Rubick’s Cube. And so one comes finally to the only accurate conclusion one can, which is that this is all legal. They make the rules. They set the standards. They lie to the public with their own permissions and protection. And they have organized and are currently playing out the end of one of the biggest ponzi schemes in the history of all scams. And its all legal, because those perpetrating the scheme are also the lawmakers, law enforcers, and beneficiaries that would otherwise stop such a crime.
And what is the end? Why, its not the end at all, just a transitionary stage with severe growing pains. For what is the end for us is just the beginning of a totally controlled globalist government modeled after this one. Same scheme but on a world-wide scale. Thus all men must be marked with a digital, biometric, legal identity and forced into the global social security pension fund scheme in order to continue the grand ponzi scheme. And those willing to cooperate will of course be given the opportunity to do it all over again, to contribute into new globally managed pension funds in exchange for global taxation on all global taxpayers to further purchase the controlling share of all corporations world-wide.
Don’t you realize that congress is the bank, and that all corporations calling themselves as banks and men as corporate bankers are under the unified umbrella and law of the only actual bank that exists — government?
Who prints the money? Government.
Who holds copyright on the money? Government.
Who controls that money’s circulation? Government.
Who allows and disproves banks to participate as members of the Federal Reserve? Government.
Who passes all laws regarding money? Government.
And don’t forget that Nelson, Jay, Winthrop, and Winthrop P (Jr.) Rockefeller and of course the Rothschild cousins were also politicians, not just bankers… and they pretend to be both Democrats and Republicans!
So what don’t you understand?
–=–
“Those who manipulate the organized habits and opinions of the masses constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of the country… It remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by this relatively small number of persons… It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world… As civilization has become more complex, and as the need for invisible government has been increasingly demonstrated, the technical means have been invented and developed by which opinion may be regimented.”
—Edward Bernays (1891–1995), Author, Propaganda, and Chief Advisor to William Paley, who founded CBS in 1928
–=–
Is it really so difficult to imagine this, even as we watch with every new administration the same corporate shills and CEOs flowing freely in and out of public and corporate office, only to later be hired or rehired back under the same or higher office and title that he or she was before responsible in regulating (read de-regulating)? When bankers become Fed Chairmen, Monsanto executives become head of the FDA, and even when only Zionist, duel-citizen, warmongering Israeli “Jews” become chiefs of staff and sole advisors in trust for strictly Arab nations, we can see there is a grave fault in this regulatory, legal, and political system. A fault, indeed, but not to those organized criminals in tow. For again, the system is running as smoothly as can be imagined from an extortive, criminally minded perspective, the litmus test being not only these obvious rewarding and stratigic corporate moves in and out of government, but the exact control of public opinion and purposeful ignorance spoken of above.
Consider this: what was and still is a “bank” before these very modern buildings we have so named as such were constructed, before fiat currency and digital credit systems? Just like the church is not a building created by the hands of men but is the righteous people thereof, so too is a bank not just a building built by men, but the incorporated persons thereof. The bank is government! For all corporations are under, registered to, and premised by government. A bank only exists because government says it can, and for no other reason. Always has been this way, always will be, for there is no purpose or power to any legalistic, corporate government without control of commerce and its monetary tools.
BANK – A bench or seat; the bench of justice; the bench or tribunal occupied by the judges; the seat of judgment;a court. The full bench, or full court; the assembly of all the judges of a court… (Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition)
FIAT – [Latin from fio.] Let it be done; a decree; a command to do something. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
–=–
“A banker is one who makes merchandise of money… An act to be done by a bank means an act to be done by those who have the authority to do it.”
–W.C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889, Definition of Bank
–=–
The root of all evil is not money itself as a tool of exchange, but making money from money and changing that which is valued in money into merchandise. The money-changer is evil because he changes the intention of money into that of usury (interest) and grocery (retail). If money and its creation were at all times and by law not for profit, most of the worlds problems would be solved. Mammon would have no cloths. And none of this cancerous, out of control, never payable growth and debt would be possible. To be clear, without debt (contract), no man or government would ever have power over another. This will become very clear as we proceed.
Most use the word fiat as attached to any currency without knowing its actual meaning. Of course, a fiat currency is simply the will of the king or head of the church and state, or in our modern sense, the “government” as defined and constituted. The government (under the head magistrates of congress and president) writes (appropriates) a bill, and out of thin air valuation (mammon) is created by these false gods (creators of artifice), a fictional value to be later manifested by and represented as fiat currency, with the caveat that this creation from nothing is actually a debt upon the entire public realm, which in Reality can never actually be paid without destroying the “economy.” Once the negative value is positively placed (balanced) into the legal accounting or doomsday book, it can then be printed into some form of certificate of debt, as legal tender.
It is said that only a god can create something from nothing. Well, government is a legally constituted god you fools! It is master over what it creates…
One only need understand one’s own disposition in court to understand the master (god) and servant relationship between a citizen and a magistrate (judge). For today we may use the word plea or plead in official standing, but it still means the same as it did from its inception. The citizen can know only one, legal god, for the citizen is not of Nature and thus not part of or under the Law of Nature.
When we plead to a judge, we are actually, legally, praying to a god (magistrate). The fact that the reader may deny this in any way shows how ignorant, how “imbecilic” we have all been made as to the very law system that governs our persons.
PRAYER – The request contained in a bill in equity that the court will grant the process, aid, or relief which the complainant desires. Also, by extension, the term is applied to that part of the bill which contains this request. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition)
PRAY IN AID – In old English practice. To call upon for assistance. In real actions, the tenant might pray in aidor call for assistance of another, to help him to plead, because of the feebleness or imbecility of his own estate. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition)
PRAYER OP PROCESS – is a petition with which a bill in equity used to conclude, to the effect that a writ of subpoena might issue against the defendant to compel him to answer upon oath all the matters charged against him in the bill. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition)
PRAYER OF PROCESS – chancery. Plead.That part of a bill which prays that the defendant be compelled to appear and answer the bill, and abide the determination of the court on the subject, is called prayer of process.This prayer must contain the name’s of all Persons who are intended to be made parties. (–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856)
PRAYER FOR RELIEF – chancery. Pleading. This is the name of that part of the bill, which, as the phrase imports, prays for relief.This prayer is either general or special but the general course is for the plaintiff to make a special prayer for particular relief to which he thinks himself entitled, and then to conclude with a prayer of general relief at the discretion of the court.(–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856)
PRAY – verb intransitive – [Latin precor; proco; this word belongs to the same family as preach and reproach; Hebrew, to bless, to reproach; rendered in Job 2:9, to curse; properly, to reproach, to rail at or upbraid. In Latin the word precor signifies to supplicate good or evil, and precis signifies a prayer and a curse. See Imprecate.] 1. To ask with earnestness or zeal, as for a favor, or for something desirable; to entreat; to supplicate. Pray for them who despitefully use you and persecute you. Matthew 5:44. 2. To petition; to ask, as for a favor; as in application to a legislative body. 3. In worship, to address the Supreme Being with solemnity and reverence, with adoration, confession of sins, supplication for mercy, and thanksgiving for blessings received. When thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father who is in secret, and thy Father who seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly. Matthew 6:5. 4. I pray that is, I pray you tell me, or let me know, is a common mode of introducing a question. – verb transitive – To supplicate; to entreat; to urge. We pray you in Christ’s stead, be ye reconciled to God. 2 Corinthians 5:20. 1. In worship, to supplicate; to implore; to ask with reverence and humility. Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thy heart may be forgiven thee. Acts 8:22. 2. To petition. The plaintiff prays judgment of the court.He that will have the benefit of this act, must pray a prohibition before a sentence in the ecclesiastical court. 3. To ask or intreat in ceremony or form. Pray my colleague Antonius I may speak with him. [In most instances, this verb is transitive only by ellipsis. To pray God, is used for to pray to God; to pray a prohibition, is to pray for a prohibition, etc.] To pray in aid, in law,is to call in for help one who has interest in the cause. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
–=–
Like being so lost in The Matrix virtual reality simulation that you have no idea you are even in it, so too have we been tricked and deceived into calling these men in uniform dress and code as our false gods (magistrates/judges) without realizing what we are doing. You pray to these magistrate gods with every question, with every answer, and with every supplication (solicitation) to any government functionary or agency. And this is exactly how the Bible instructs us we will be deceived, by the love of false gods (idolatry). There is no mystery here, just the love of fiction over Nature (Reality). This is not colloquial, not metaphor, and not to be taken lightly. For it establishes the doctrine of master and servant, meaning we voluntarily worship, pray to, and thus are fallen through contract under government oppression and extortion. It is new feudalism by contract law, for the contract makes the law. This is the legal meaning of volunteerism. And what is most misunderstood about volunteerism is that, just like in the military after one has voluntarily joined, the coercion and violence happens only after one has volunteered, not before. In other words, the fallacy of involuntarily or unwillingly receiving services at the barrel of a gun is completely misconstrued, for the service can only be forced once volunteerism, as the doctrine of master and servant, has been contracted (e.g. public, US citizenship). Once under contract (use of person), the contract makes the law, and he who makes the contract makes the law of the contract, and thus is the god over anyone under the contractual relationship (as a user of anothers property). If you use the name, number, signature, or any other mark of identity (sameness) of any legal creation, then you are bound to perform as that legal persona (mask) and pray to these false legal gods for everything. It is they that permit you to fish and hunt and drive on their public lands, feud style. If you have received any such license, then you received it voluntarily by praying (applying for permission) to a magistrate (legal god) for it.
It’s time we are re-taught that the word god is a generic, general term meaning nothing until qualified, and that this word god in its legal sense applies to many political positions (persons/flattering titles) of men. While today we use the words plea (plead) to the judge (lord) of the court, the court records of just 100 years ago show a very different and honest language, revealing clearly that we prayed to the god of the court, which was the judge (magistrate). Even today in rare court cases can we find the word prayer instead of plea. It is even law in England that certain high-ranking judges be called as “lords.” And so we must realize that this word god is not merely a religious one, but also a term of the legal art. A god (lower case) is therefor a construct of the legal matrix, having no authority except over that which it creates and governs as property. And whether you care to admit it or not, your gods are certainly well-defined for you, especially if you are a pensioner.
GOD – noun – …2. A false god; a heathen deity; an idol. Fear not the gods of the Amorites. Judges 6:10. 3. A prince; a ruler;a MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE an angel. Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people. Exodus 22:28. Psalms 97:7… 4. Any person or thing exalted too much in estimation, or deified and honored as the chief good. Whose god is their belly. Philippians 3:19. – verb transitive – To deify…(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
MAGISTRATE – noun – [Latin magistratus, from magister, master;magis, major, and ster, Teutonic steora, a director; steoran, to steer; the principal director.] A public civil officer,invested with the executive government or some branch of it. In this sense, a king is the highest or first magistrate as is the President of the United States. But the word is more particularly applied to subordinate officers, as governors, intendants, prefects, mayors, justices of the peace, and the like. The magistrate must have his reverence; the laws their authority. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
–=–
You may not like religion, but you have chosen your anti (false) gods and worship them daily because you have chosen citizenship under them and their legal system. You vote for them and honor them as if you are castrated, sacrificial goats. You allow them power over you in surety of their offered citizenship in personhood and they accept your voluntary sacrifice and thus reward you justly with debt-slavery in the credit form of fiat currency, allowing you freedom (commercial franchise) within their district (open-air debtors prison).
But then, I wouldn’t expect the average joe to know what it is to be confined (interned) in a district, what the word means, and why it is the foundation of debt-slavery as a citizen to it:
DISTRICT – noun – [Latin, to press hard, to bind.See Distrain.] 1. Properly, a limited extent of country; a circuit within which power,right or authority may be exercised,and to which it is restrained;a word applicable to any portion of land or country, or to any part of a city or town, which is defined by law or agreement.A governor, a prefect, or a judge may have his district… (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
DISTRAIN – verb transitive – [Latin dis and stringo. See Strain. Blackstone writes distrein.] 1. To seize for debt;to take a personal chatel from the possession of a wrong-doer into the possession of the injured party, to satisfy a demand, or compel the performance of a duty; as, to distrain goods from rent, or for an amercement. 2. To rend; to tear. – verb intransitive – To make seizure of goods. On whom I cannot distrain for debt. For neglecting to do suit to the lords court, or other personal service, the lord may distrain of common right. [In this phrase however some word seems to be understood; as, to distrain goods.] (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
–=–
And that’s what you are patriotic about, carelessly and without conscious understanding as to why, waving the US flag of your particular district of Caesar?
The question you should be asking is not when but when aren’t you in the district of the Untied States and its gods (magistrates) and administrative law? The answer, my friend, is never. Why? It’s really simple. Just like a cartoon can’t exist outside of the cartoon realm, nether can a citizen (person/status) exist outside of the fictional district (jurisdiction) that created it. You cannot pretend to be a US citizen-ship unless you worship the law and authority of its gods. So stop pretending you aren’t a volunteer, a servant, and for once in your life acknowledge your free will choice and where it has led you. And don’t you dare call yourself a “Christian” or any other religious flattering title while acting under these false gods under their law and while idolizing them and their system of schemes in mammon with legal “freedom of religion.” If you can’t act like a follower of Christ by penalty of law, then you cannot call yourself as a son of God. You don’t qualify. You aren’t acting the part. Just stop!
IDOLATRY – noun – [Latin idololatria. Gr. idol, and to worship or serve.] 1. The worship of idols, images, or any thing made by hands, or which is not God. Idolatry is of two kinds; the worship of images, statues, pictures, etc., made by hands; and the worship of the heavenly bodies, the sun, moon and stars, or of demons, angels, men and animals. 2. Excessive attachment or veneration for any thing, or that which borders on adoration. (Webs1828)
IDOLATER – noun – [Latin idololatra. See Idolatry.] 1. A worshiper of idols; one who pays divine honors to images, statues, or representations of any thing made by hands; one who worships as a deity that which is not God;a pagan. 2. An adorer; a great admirer. (Webs1828)
–=–
Why do so many religions cause you to worship angels and saints with halos of light above their heads? Do you know that there are no halos in the Bible, and that the halo appeared upon pre-christian era art of the Egyptian god of Ra, the rays of the sun god? It is idolatry to worship saints (sinners), not the least of all because “saint” is a flattering title, to which the Bible says to never respect. But then, who reads the source of their religion anymore to find out everything they are doing and worshiping and praying for is indeed against Nature’s God and Law.
Whose portrait (image) is on money? Why, its the most celebrated, idolized heads of past magistrate gods, of course — the presidents of the Untied States!
In god(s) we trust… Really?
It would be easier to point out the few things we are not committing idolatry on a daily basis than to point to each instance.
But hey, you don’t believe in God (all of self-Existence/Nature/the Universe)? Then why have you manifestly chosen a replacement, anti-god (president, king, pope) for your idolatrous worship? Why the worship of money and its false existence and valuation (mammon)? Which is more ridiculous, to worship all of Nature as on (monotheist) God, or to worship all things fictional as Real, as a replacement system for Nature and its Law? How can you prove or even consider that God doesn’t exist (i.e. trying to prove a negative, which is impossible) when you have voluntarily voted for so many false, replacement gods in government in Its stead? How can we call ourselves anything but fools in this regard? To be clear, this taking of a false god signifies one and only one thing, an abandonment of God and thus what is called God’s Law, or the Law of Nature, which is where all Natural Rights of men are said to come from even by these legal gods. You do not need to be religious in any way to understand what this means, nor that it is a choice. Only a fool would write this off as just religion when in fact it is all recognized as the foundation and opposing force of (and salvation from) the legal law. It is the common law. For you must realize above all else that the legal system and its false creator gods (magistrates) not only believe in but wholly acknowledge in their law the existence of a higher, uncontrollable power called as “God.” And if they acknowledge it as master, thus so do you as their servant. Again, you have no choice, for they are the lawmakers, administrators, and masters of the persona (property) you pretend to be and use as a districted citizenship.
ACT OF GOD – Inevitable accident;vis major. Any misadventure or casualty is said to be caused by the “act of God“when it happens by the direct, immediate, and exclusive operation of the forces of NATURE, uncontrolled or uninfluenced by the power of man and without human intervention, and is of such a character that it could not have been prevented or escaped from by any amount of foresight or prudence, or by any reasonable degree of care or diligence, or by the aid of any appliances which the situation of the party might reasonably require him to use. Inevitable accident, or casualty; any accident produced by any physical causewhich is irresistible, such as lightning, tempests, perils of the seas, an inundation, or earthquake; and also the sudden illness or death of persons. Under the term “act of God” are comprehended all misfortunes and accidents arising from inevitable necessity, which human prudence could not foresee or prevent. (Black1)
ACT OF STATE – An act done by the sovereign power of a COUNTRY, or by its delegate, within the limits of the power vested in him. An act of state cannot be questioned or made the subject of legal proceedings in a court of law.(Black1)
ACT OF LAW – The operation of fixed LEGAL rules upon given FACTS or occurrences, producing consequences independent of the design or will of the parties concerned;as distinguished from “act of parties.” (Black1)
–=–
Stop for a moment and imagine the evil grin upon the face of any judge (false god) towards any fool that stands before him, literally praying (pleading) to him, while claiming at the same time to be an atheist. LOL! Imagine contacting an insurance agency only to be told that an “Act of God” isn’t covered because it’s not a legally sanctioned act of man. To then claim the non-Existence of God would be like dying of thirst because you believe your body needs no water. The author asks not here for the reader to suddenly grasp religion, for religion is not of God (Nature). Religion is a creation of man alone. I simply warn you that only a fool would go down the path of claiming a negative, that God doesn’t Exist, knowing that a negative cannot ever be proven, while at the same time subscribing to a government that not only believes in and acknowledges the power and authority of a God that’s higher than it, but also directly tells you that your only True rights come from God, and that giving up those rights is a necessity to be a citizen in its district.
If it isn’t clear by now, all these things aren’t an effort to attempt to vainly prove that God Exists or does not Exist, but instead to establish the foundation of the entire fiction that is the legal system, which clearly admits of and legislates based on said Existence (God). To participate in such a system while denying the Existence of the very concept and definition of “God” as the source of all things in and as the Universe, in and as Nature (the Universe), and of course the source of all “natural rights” is about as stupid an action as anyone can possibly take. To deny Source is to deny ones own Existence, and that borders on insanity. To deny God is to deny Existence Itself, as nihilism, which in the eyes of any government that bases its entire law and foundational superstructure on the God (verb/action/Existence/Being) of Nature, The Law of God, on self-Existence in self-responsibility, is to necessarily deny the Law of Nature and instead embrace its opposite, the legal law system (doctrine) of man. To declare “atheism” publicly is to declare publicly the need to be enslaved, which is why those that did in recent history were shunned, banished and imprisoned.
Even if this is all fiction, and God doesn’t Exist, I want you to consider that this entire legal, governmental and non-governmental system and its insurances is still based on the fiction, and you are still under that fictional story. It makes no sense whatsoever either way to deny “God” when government elevates “God” as Source and the reason for its existence (opposition). In fact, its really the dumbest “public” thing you can espouse.
I am not spouting my own opinion here, but giving you the definition of God (Jehovah) as it was intended to be read in the Bible and other scriptural (Truthful) sources, and as can be found in the concordances, lexicons, Bible dictionaries, and all other sources. To read the Bible without the definition of God is perhaps the most idiotic thing anyone can do. But then, that’s exactly what we’ve been taught to do, and then to actually debate with each other on whether or not Existence Itself exists? LOL! Brilliant. Oh, the idiocracy we have become…
But then, isn’t that congenial with the whole point of this essay, the mostly unwitting and often purposeful ignorance and irrationality of the public mindset, which can be tricked into actually and publicly not believing in Self-Existence, in what is the self-evident Truth, which is the very definition of God used in the Bible? Not a man in the clouds or a burning bush as used metaphorically to tell a story, but in Nature and all the Universe as a “Living God…” What is God. Its simple. All that is not man-made, including words. Thus “God is Truth.”
Inversely and really quite amazingly, at the same time we have also been completely stupefied and have lost all contemplation that our rulers are our acting replacement gods, or even that as replacement (anti) gods this must necessarily mean that a Higher God must be acknowledge even by them. There is no replacement (anti) without some Source to be opposed to or in the stead of. There can be no alternative immoral (anti-moral), legal law unless first and Highest there is a foundational moral Law. Are these Truths not as well self-evident? We pretend that the current queens (kings), popes, and other rulers are descended from those Kings, Pharaohs and Caesars of old, that nothing has changed accept the ridiculous delusion of active democracy. We are tricked quite handily into voting, or not voting, a wonderfully deceiving false choice. For there is never a choice to vote no. To not vote is a just to abstain, which members of congress do all the time, though the bills the abstain from voting on still get passed. It’s all a trick designed to manufacture at least the illusion of mass consent. And as we now see, the real voting that actually counts — votes for boards of directors and for millions of unelected Executive offices and agency employees in the federal government, which the president appoints — happens behind closed doors without public consent. For the only consent needed is volunteerism. The entirely useless public vote only strengthens the delusion of servitude to these gods. To vote yes or no is to constant to that which you are voting for, no matter the outcome. Thus, a no vote or not voting at all is always counted as a consensual yes vote.
Perhaps the greatest tomfoolery we still suffer to day is the illusion that the public vote ever actually elects the president of the United States. I spent many months dissecting the electoral college process as implemented by the constitution, and attempted to explain it in a short and what I thought would be fun and entertaining documentary with a bit of facial recognition software, which today is all the rage. But, to my chagrin, I mostly received the ultimate fallacy, the ad hominem, a bad case of shoot the messenger. Try something new or different in this crowd, be prepared to be attacked. For there is little brotherly love or organization in the alternative media, just continuous insult and disorganization, the hallmark of any losing side. Try and tell those who believe they have a choice that in reality they don’t, and prepare to be pummeled with belief (faith) based nonsense and insults. But for educational purposes, and if you want to prove to anyone, including yourself, the entire fraud that is our voting system, here it is for better of for worse. This is very important to understand, for it proves without a doubt that the public vote does not count and is never used in federal elections for president. It proves not only our collective idiocracy, but also our idolatry towards candidates (men):
–=–
–=–
We are so dumbed down that we don’t even realize that political parties are private, non-governmental associations (artificial persons), which steal our choice away from us.
POLITICAL PARTY – A number of persons united in opinion and organized in the manner usual to the then existing political parties. An unincorporated,voluntary association of persons sponsoring certain ideas of government or maintaining certain political principles or beliefs in public policies of government,not a governmental agency or instrumentality. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
Anyone that actually goes to vote for president that has seen and understands this documentary can only be called a complete fool!
Anyone that is still a member of any political party after seeing this documentary and reading this definition should be institutionalized — oh wait, that’s what US public citizenship is! Open-air internment (prison). Political parties, not voters, decide who will be the candidates, and then the electoral college actually elects one of those party members, not you. Does this really make sense to you? Is this what you thought happens? Did you really think your vote was counted? Think again. You are not “the People,” dude! You are a common subject (plebe), not an elector (elite).
Do you actually think that President Donald Trump is not your god as a US citizenship? Silly rabbits… tricks really are for infants (wards). If you use the money and credit (property) and name and number of another, then by default you agree to and accept such a false god (creator) and its legal (false) law governing the use of that property. Like it or not, you’ve already volunteered to be a Trump supporter as a “democrat,” or for that matter, any and everyone and every party member that is president, even “socialists” or “communists.” Remember, no is yes! It is not the man but the office that is a false god, the flattering legal title (mask). It’s all fiction, remember. But you’re actions and participation make it your own virtual reality. It thus controls your actions and keeps you in the legal mindset of this legal matrix and its amoral code.
Perhaps you think that change in your pocket actually belongs to you, that you are not just a user of another’s property?
Perhaps you think that money (mammon) is not the ultimate tool of false judgement, rewarding the criminal element while obfuscating the meek and the charitable? You think the fact that everything Real and artificial being estimated into a fictional, monetary value happened naturally, as if God has a price-gun and marks all things in Nature as commercial products for sale and domination through false valuation (mammon) and inflation in man-made currency?
You think any of this is an Act of the God of Nature? If it was, then government could not control it or tax it, you fool!
You think that government controls us all, including banks, by any other tool than its own persona and money creation and retraction system to create a total welfare state? You think welfare (including pensions) are designed as anything else than to keep you exactly where you are at — middle class or abject poverty, without the power of God’s Law or self-government, and thus in complete and utter dependence and subservience to the government gods that give you your greedy allowance each month because you are to irresponsible to self-govern and do it yourself?
CAPTIO – In old English law and practice. A taking or seizure; arrest; receiving; holding of court.(Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition)
CLERIC – noun – A clerk or clergyman. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)
CLERICUS – In old English law. A clerk or priest; a person in holy orders; a secular priest; a clerk of a court. An officer of the royal household, having charge of thereceipt and payment of moneys, etc… In Roman law. A minister of religion in the Christian church; an ecclesiastic or priest. A general term, including bishops, priests, deacons, and others of inferior order. Also of the amanuenses of the judges or courts of the king.(Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition)
–=–
Congress, to be exact, is the creator and controller of all these functions regarding the established monetary and financial network. Contrary to the conspiratorial diatribe that floats around the alternative wavelengths and literature like a never-dissipating fart, there is no evil set of “bankers” that control government or its money. If you believe this propaganda, then the real banker that is government can easily get away with its organized crime schemes while you spend all your time looking for that which does not exist. To be clear, by law and even by reason alone, no bank or “banker” (agent) is higher in authority than government (principal), nor is such a status even possible, since that which creates a legal status cannot create such a status that is higher than itself. This is a maxim of law and again self-evident. What is lower cannot create what is higher.
Of course, it was Congress that created the “Securities and Exchange Commission” as an independent agency of government, just as it did the “Federal Reserved System.” All agencies are but government corporations created as congressional aids in the day-to-day business of government (organized crime). One simply cannot be a “banker” unless one receives permissive licensure from government to use that title and benefit to participate in the funny money (fiat) monopoly scheme that is the banking, securities, and stock exchange scam. Again, no person or man may have a status higher than government, than that which creates statuses, for government cannot grant to any man or corporation anything higher than itself. This is a self-evident limitation of all gods and magistrates, though lost on most people. And all maxims of law certainly agree, for the law never requires or allows what is impossible. In more simple terms, the creation can never be higher in status or authority than the creator/inventor. The part is never higher than the whole. The image (idol) cannot actually be greater than the Source.
But the propaganda that some shadowy bankers rule the world is sure a handy cover for the real bankers (world government congresses/legislators) to operate under the cover of public idiocracy, for without even trying they hide their operation under that which cannot exist by their own law!
I bet right now many readers are defending these so-called enemy “bankers” like they defend the central enemy called “the Fed” as they cling to their needed lies and fallacies, for it is much easier to create fictional villains that operate outside of the system than to admit that the true villains are those we ourselves pretend to vote into authority as our gods within the system. And it’s certainly much easier to elect false gods and be subject to the legal law as debt slaves than to follow the Law of Nature and be free from such monetary devices and traps. The self-governing Free man under God — the very concept this country was built upon — is today few and far between.
Just what do you think a banker is?
BANKER – noun – One who keeps a bank; one who trafficks in money, receives and remits money, negotiates bills of exchange, etc. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
ARGENTARIUS (plural, Argentarii) – In the Roman law, a money lender or broker; a dealer in money; a banker. Argentarium, the instrument of the loan, similar to the modern word “bond” or “note.” (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
ARGENTEUS – An old French coin, answering nearly to the English shilling. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
ARGENTUM – Silver; money. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
ARGENTUM ALBUM – Bullion; uncoined silver; common silver coin; silver coin worn smooth. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
ARGENTUM DEI – God’s money; God’s penny; money given as earnest in making a bargain. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
The corruption of money and bankers is not new, and have never been separate from the church and state. They operate with license from state and forgiveness from church. Ridiculous! There is nothing new under the sun... We are still under the Roman Law as national citizens under Caesar, a word/title that also means district. Again, history hasn’t repeated, for history has no end. History is merely something we talk about as we walk upon its never-ending timeline. Today is tomorrows history. Time is money. As the Eagle’s sang, you can spend all your time making money, or you can spend all your money making time. In the end, they’re the same thing — fiction. Poor and middle class serve time for their crimes, while the wealthy elite pay money instead of giving their time. Time is a creation of man, not God (Nature), for Nature is the unchanging Existence, the God of (Existing as) the permanence of All things. Nature is priceless and timeless. And only in this timeless, priceless garden may men find peace and tranquility.
Government keeps the Fed while the Fed is designated by government to keeps all banks.
Government traffics in money, for the word traffic simply means commerce, trade, and buying and selling of market commodities, and it does so through its independent agency, the Fed, which is and always has been under the authority and law of congress without exception. Any freedoms or independence the Fed or any other agency of government has is because congress made it so. It is ridiculous to believe anything else when all the facts are presented and the shock-jocks and false profit authors are shown to be frauds.
Government is the great negotiator of bills of exchange, being the very creator of the Securities and Exchange system, the stock market, whose corporations are also creations of and under the laws of government.
You will not find a definition for banker that refers to anything but this. The only difference between a “private banker” and an “individual banker” is that the private banker (legal person) is not incorporated as a bank, and is thus merely a trafficker (commercial agent) in mammon by license of government. Both operate within the system and UNDER its laws, and both are required to report their taxable operations to government. And yes, the government is god (creator and lawmaker) of the Fed. There is no mystery here. They are not higher than that which regulates their trade. Government is the only banker (creator), and all other “bankers” fall under its purview and authority. Again, this is self-evident if for no other reason than the very financial reporting requirements we are unveiling here. All so-called “bankers” report to government in one way or the other.
Even the financial and political god “Donald Trump” files tax returns to government, for the name “Donald Trump” and its incorporated conglomerates by that same legal surname only exist inside of government (jurisdiction, corporate limit), not outside. Donald Trump, the person (legal status), simply does not exist in Nature, and neither does your person (legal status). But remember, this is all fiction. None of it is real. It just a trick. It is designed to control you. For there is only one entity in the world that is not controlled by money, and that is its creator, which is government. Money is strictly a tool to bind all men under one false, incorporated god (as a body politic). Money is debt.
The point here is that if you invest in the stock market, stop calling it anything that what it is: gambling. Quit pretending to know what you are doing, and quit pretending that if you happen to do the right thing by chance or even by strategic planning in the markets, you are doing nothing more than supporting this massive scheme to take over the entire corporate structure of the world, especially if you are a pensioner (dependent). For while you may gain some profits in money temporarily, we all lose when in the near-term future the end of these financial schemes comes to fruition and the entire world economy and all its corporation are majority owned by government and thus completely controlled by government in absolute communist style, all the while masquerading as artificial freedom and democracy (i.e. volunteerism).
In essence, pensioners are colloquially like lemmings collectively running while blindfolded towards the edge of a cliff with the rest of us commoners caught in the way, with no other place to go than down. But then, this has always been the goal of implementing a democracy into an other wise self-governing, moral nation.
Don’t like the truth?
Well, don’t shoot this messenger unless you shoot these as well:
—=—
“Democracy is the road to socialism.”
—Karl Marx
—=—
“Democracy is indispensable to socialism.”
“Socialism is merely state-capitalist monopoly which is made to serve the interests of the whole people…”
—Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, (seperate quotes), excerpted from the pamphlet ‘The Impending Catastrophe and How to Combat it, September 1917’ as Lenin’s Collected Works, Progress Publishers, 1977, Moscow, Volume 25, from Lenin Internet Archive.
—=—
“Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty.”
—Plato
—=—
“A pure democracy is generally a very bad government. It is often the most tyrannical government on earth; for a multitude is often rash, and will not hear reason.”
—Noah Webster
—=—
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”
—John Adams
—=—
“The best way to destroy the capitalist system is to debauch the currency.”
—Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
—=—
“Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism.”
—Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
—=—
“There are no morals in politics; there is only expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just because he is a scoundrel.”
—Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
—=—
“The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class are to represent and repress them in parliament.”
—Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
—=—
“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”
—Winston Churchill
—=—
What is the pension fund system? Democracy in action. For it is when the government and the populace figures out they can vote for themselves personal, vast riches from the public coffers that the true nature of democracy rears its ugly head. And we are watching the consequences even now, as it wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. Yet the average pensioner will sink with the ship rather than repent from that public pension welfare check, as any scoundrel would be expected to do. United we stand MY ASS!
Now, getting back to our subject at hand…
Predicting the stock market, of course, is like predicting a hurricane. Like helpless weathermen with their inept technology designed to somehow fathom the nature of what they call “chaos” (i.e. the unknowable Design of God), these self-proclaimed market gurus report with confidence bleeding into arrogance that which they have no idea is true or false information (the unknowable design of the legal gods in government finance). They attempt to analyze this completely planned, organized, and loosely controlled chaotic system as if they are on the inside — as if they are or at least somehow theosophically have the perspective of its gods. But in reality they are as caught up in the winds of random change in that storm as anyone of us that put our faith (trust) in their apparently magical, even theosophical (god-like) ability to know the direction of the unknown. Yet the chaotic flareups caused by that giant hemorrhoid of a market that keeps growing and shrinking when we least expect it has no readily apparent (public) rhyme or reason, anymore than the Wizard of Oz’s true grand master plan can be understood without revealing the man behind the curtain. Predicting that the stock market will go down (crash) or go up (boom) is like predicting that a tree will eventually grow and die. The guru uses no date, no time, and no reasoning, merely empty time frames and publicly disclosed connections smothered in fallacious logic with no apologies for being wrong in their vague forethoughts or vague timeframes, instead continuously putting forward new possibilities upon the commercial time-line presented on behalf of the latest rhetoric (and now tweets) of market propagandists, who are legally justified, protected, and encouraged to lie to the public.
To this end, we have seemingly trapped ourselves inside our own bubble of shared belief in these publicly disclosed lies. By first respecting the lies by treating them as facts, and then by publicly spreading those lies to others while promoting them as facts, the master plan behind those lies is allowed to come to fruition despite being built upon provable lies and through omission of neutralizing facts. In other words, our mutual lie factories called the mainstream and alternative media feed us not opposing lies, but lies created to suit the disposition and apparent helplessness of the audience. The logical fallacy may go something like this: the mainstream media lies, therefore the alternative media must be true, or, the puppet acting as criminal manager of a pension fund said it publicly, therefore it must be true. It’s not so much that the lie is accepted as truth as much as it is accepted as an excuse. And yet the whole concept behind these audited financial statements is very much to eliminate such public excuses. The CAFR is simply a report of the audited facts and the stated reasons behind those facts. Thus, as we will see, while this pension fund manager of CalPERS is publicly declaring near insolvency for his managed fund through omission of the comparison of any contrary fact, the CAFR says quite the opposite.
But the most horrific part about this is that the rest of us are not really surprised with each new epoch of criminal activity, extortion, and outright pilferage of what was the taxes we paid collectively for what we expected to be taxpayer services. A quick look at just the “non-governmental” investment fund totals for all governments out there, and it’s easy to feel the giant, perfectly designed screw burrowing all the way up our collective, dumb asses.
For now, let us count down the so-called “facts” as publicly presented so far…
CalPERS is somehow near insolvency.
A “pension fund crisis” (future doom) is apparent and seemingly inevitable.
Therefore, CalPERS pension fund (and others) may need a taxpayer reform or bailout soon.
This is apparently true and “confirmed” because of the public heresy spoken by a board member of CalPERS on a tweet and from other publicly spun rhetoric.
You see, while you believe that the public is merely made to bail out banks as private institutions from government when they are caught making bad investments, the truth is that the public is made to bail out government-held and proxy-vote controlled institutions of its own. It is the principal bailing out its agents through public debt, for the sole purposes of continued corporate existence (continuity of government) and to keep the shareholders (mostly government and elite) happy. Now you have the full picture. You are bailing out government’s stock position, not just those corporations, for it is law to make the shareholders profit. Can you say conflict of interest?
Before we address these fallacious fear-porn talking points as completely falsified, designed nonsense, let’s get a little more information about the reasons behind such unverified, veiled public heresy and this all around bad reporting of it. Why lie?
Continuing with the ZeroHedge publicly parroted report:
“Westly was referring to an editorial laying out “the essence” of California’s pension crisis, exposed last week when the $350 billion California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) made a “relatively small change“in its amortization policy…“
Specifically, the CalPERS board voted to change the period for recouping future investment losses from 30 years to 20 years. While this may not sound like much, the bottom line is that it would require the California state government and thousands of local government agencies and school districts “to ramp up their mandatory contributions to the huge trust fund.”
As author Dan Walters observes, with client agencies – cities, particularly – already complaining that double-digit annual increases in CalPERS payments are driving some of them towards insolvency,the new policy – which kicks in next year – will raise those payments even more.
“What we are trying to avoid is a situation where we have a city that is already on the brink,and applying a 20-year amortization schedule would put them over the edge,” a representative of the League of California Cities, Dane Hutchings, told the CalPERS board before its vote.”
–=–
I dare anyone to find me a city that is actually “on the brink…” not by its public commentary (propaganda) and yearly budgetary nonsense and lack of disclosure, but based on its CAFR audit report? Anyone?
Amazingly, the whole scheme is plotted here in just a couple of sentences, and yet the public seems unable to put the pieces together…
If the reader has not put two and two together yet, you should know that when this article states that the “California state government and thousands of local government agencies and school districts” must “ramp up their mandatory contributions to the huge trust fund,” you must realize that there is only one source of funding for all of these governments — and that’s you. And me. And all other public taxes and fees paid by everyone else in every state and the nation. Yes, that’s right, your taxpayer money is placed into investment funds like this instead of being used for what you imagined it would be used for. But then, who really needs taxpayer services anyway, right? Who doesn’t want nothing for something, after all? Who doesn’t like paying for what you don’t get? And who doesn’t think it’s perfectly reasonable that local governments should bail out a pension fund when it takes a temporary loss on its gambling habits, even if it will cause them to go bankrupt?
It’s the American way…
At this point though, one would think that even the pensioners themselves, those taking benefits, money, insurance, etc. from this fund, would realize the insanity behind such a plan. But then, in the free wage-slave capitalist system, one doesn’t bite the hand that both feeds them and chokes them and their family, neighbors, and friends at the same time. The pensioner is first in line, of course, to support any excuse (public lie) that comes along so that government can extort from the rest of us to support themselves. This is the curse of mammon.
If only the pensioners themselves understood that insolvency means reorganization, and that reorganization means pension fund cuts and the decrease or death of their meager benefits. This lot of loosely organized pensioners is like a parasite that starts eating itself once all the meat and organs of the host are devoured! Not ironically, the pensioner sees him or her self no longer as a taxpayer but as a government-employed pensioner, exactly as a unionized laborer imaginarily sees him or her self as part of that communistically designed, semi-elitist club that artificially raises ones status in commercial society and feeds the ego with flattery of title and benefits unequal to all others not in or allowed to be in the club. We forget, collectively, that we are all in the same boat, paying the same taxes as subjects and hoping for a responsible, honest, and dependable government in exchange for voluntarily extorted taxes. Instead, we are turned against each other and made completely irrational, competitive, and cold-hearted, caught up in whatever mutual excuse the party, union, or group publicly supports to justify our artificial existence as its member. Their continuous flow of money-for-nothing at the expense of all others in their regular and “early” retirement is apparently more important than their support of a stable and mutually beneficial local government.
I pay taxes for potholes to be repaired. They pay taxes to support their own pensions while potholes continue to grow unchecked due to lack of taxpayer money that is instead exacted into keeping the pension fund’s appearance of future solvency based on false actuarial projections in 20-30 years.
The greatest delusion of all here is that pension funds are funded by and strictly for the employees that are members. They are not. They are globalist, governmental investment schemes that are responsible more than any other financial tool in existence for globalism and for unprecedented corporate funding of the worst possible corporations by government-controlled investments. They are a constant flow of required taxpayer money being invested into the future state of global, centralized governance of all corporations, on stock purchase at a time. The pensioner has no stake whatsoever in the funds, which is why what they invest into the pension fund is called a “contribution.” Once a contribution (gift) is made, it is not retainable. The pensioner can only hope they die before the ultimate end-game happens — the sacking of the fund due to military or corporate takeover or bankruptcy reorganization. PENSIONERS HAVE NO EQUITY IN THESE FUNDS.
To be clear, contributions to these funds are an imposition, not a right. The problem with the collective delusion of pensioners is that they don’t realize they are themselves considered as unable to care for themselves, and thus completely dependent on the system the contribute to. Dependence is certainly not in any way freedom, though they’ll sell you that it is.
IMPOSE – To levy or exact as by authority; to lay as a burden, tax, duty or charge. (–Blacks Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
IMPOSITION – An impost; tax; contribution. (–Blacks Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
CONTRIBUTORY – noun – A person liable to contribute to the assets of a company which is being wound up,as being a member or (in some cases) a past member thereof. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the American Language, 1828)
CONTRIBUTORY – adjective – Joining in the promotion of a given purpose;lending assistance to the production of a given result. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the American Language, 1828)
CONTRIBUTION – In the civil law. A partition by which the creditors of an insolvent debtor divide among themselves the proceeds of his property proportionably to the amount of their respective credits. Division which is made among the heirs of the succession of the debts with which the succession is charged, according to the proportion which each is bound to bear. In common law. The sharing of a loss or payment among several. The act of any one or several of a number of co-debtors, co-sureties, etc., in reimbursing one of their number who has paid the whole debt or suffered the whole liability, each to the extent of his proportionate share. (–Blacks Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
They take your contribution and divide it among themselves (between persons, for corporations are persons too), and in return for your blind support of their combination of globalist corporate empire, they give you a return on your blanket share and according to its value. But this return is secondary in every way to the plan itself, being only the excuse that allows them to exact from you and from I and all other taxpayers to support globalization and one world “corporate governance.” The pensioner is made to feel as a beneficiary, when in reality he or she is a victim of his or her own blind greed and unreasonable consideration of just what there pension funds really are — tools of total corporate globalization and centralization of all corporations into and under government control through stock ownership and collective shareholder proxy voting. In other words, the main collective shareholder gets to vote for whom is elected as boards of directors for all corporations worldwide. It gets to vote on whether mergers and acquisitions will or will not be allowed. And most importantly, the board it elects then appoints the CEO (president) of the company.
And so your millions and millions of individual little contributions matched and tripled by taxpayer (government-funded) contributions have indeed created such a monster that one cannot even imagine its size, for like The Matrix simulation, it represents the entire corporate structure of the world. It represents every chain-store you shop at, every bank on every corner, every investment firm, every pharmaceutical conglomerate, every car brand and dealer out there, and every war and weapons manufacturer in existence, everywhere. This mix of government and commercial corporations essentially places all citizens into a company store, where government prints the money we earn, taxes and imposes upon us what it desires, allows us to spend what’s left of that money in one of its investment-held corporations as they legally engross us all (charge outrageously high prices/commit legal usury by license), and then allow us to deposit, save, and invest any leftovers in their stock-owned and completely controlled system of international banks.
In other words, we are workers that spend our corporate-earned money in the collective company store, since all companies are not government held and governed. Thus, we are engrossed, extorted, and made to suffer all sorts of usury by such a monopoly.
If you are not familiar with how government agencies like CalPERS proxy votes in corporations, either watch my over 4 hour documentary, The Great Pension Fund Hoax, or just let CalPERS explain from its own website (active links):
Proxy Voting
As a long-term share owner, CalPERS sees voting our proxies asthe primary way we can influence a company’s operations and corporate governance. This is why it’s important for shareowners to vote and make their decisions based on a full understanding of publicly available information.
CalPERS also publishes additional voting information for high profile votes and company-specific shareowner campaigns. Visit Key Decisions for additional details. All votes are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.
NOTE: IF YOU UNDERSTAND THIS PROXY VOTING SYSTEM OF CORPORATE SHAREHOLDERS LIKE CALPERS, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME YOU UNDERSTAND THAT, COLLECTIVELY, ALL GOVERNMENTS ARE THE COLLECTIVE MAJORITY SHAREHOLDERS THROUGH PENSIONS AND MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENTS IN ALL CORPORATIONS, THEN YOU UNDERSTAND HOW THE ACTUAL FINANCIAL WORLD REALLY WORKS.
While no one government is a majority shareholder, when all governments pool their votes collectively through private, non-governmental associations, then as a single force governments (share-holders) become as one voice, and are when combined as shareholder proxy voters the largest by far of all institutional holders of corporate stock. E Pluribus Unum, out of many one. So the next time you hear that congress is colloquially owned by corporations as some mainstream or alternative idiot-box news outlet talking point, you’ll laugh as you are one of the few who actually know that the opposite is true, that congress has no ownership stock to be owned, and that all corporations are staffed and operated through collective, organized, government shareholders. And so if you haven’t figured it out yet, through the illusion of competition, corporations are part of (majority share owned by) government. In other words, this spells organized crime to the fullest degree. Some might go a step further and call it socialism, or fascism. But then, this is always the hidden goal of instilling a democracy – total ownership of the commercial world by government. It’s even a plank of the Communist Manifesto, of which all ten planks have been made law in some form in the United States.
For more information, watch The Great Pension Fund Hoax, always free on Youtube and at TheCorporationNation.com
But again, I digress…
Let’s address the first glaringly obvious lie listed in the above publicly claimed list of supposedly fearful facts and talking points, at least obvious to any thinking, reasonable man (male or female) that picks up an audited financial statement to verify such publicly reported rhetoric and is able therefore to neutrally put the pieces together. First, let’s find the un-hidable truth. I’d like to point out right here that when they say that the CalPERS investment fund is currently managing $350 billion in assets, we are talking about 350,000 individual bundles of $1 million dollars. One trillion equals a million million. Can you even imagine what that would look like in your head? And so this notion of being on the brink of insolvency is almost laughable when this alone is considered. I mean, seriously, they are saying $350 billion in continuous, overall gains for the life of the fund and also insolvency in the same sentence here!
But perhaps the reader won’t comprehend the laughable obfuscation here until we uncover all the facts as to why this lie is so hilarious. Moving on…
If CalPERS has 2 million members, then at $350 billion in current assets, that means it has $175,000 extra for each member already invested, aside from its yearly costs and pension plan obligations. In other words, these funds are completely separate and have nothing to do with the budgetary requirements of this pension fund and the “contributions” it receives from members and from governments (taxpayers) shown on the budget report. And remember, this is the figure after all expenses and obligations are payed each year to each member. And this gain balance keeps getting exponentially larger each year (on average), while at the same time this board member is claiming the fund is somehow also near insolvency.
In order to understand the gross magnitude of this particular public (unofficial) lie, we must have a look at what this fund’s investment value was less than 5 short years ago before passing any judgements on its performance and possible insolvency. Again, while we can plainly see in the CAFR audit that the fund balance and valuation of the CalPERS portfolio of assets are in truth skyrocketing up and up and up on an overall yearly average, these propagandists are at the same time publicly claiming the opposite is true, that the fund is somehow insolvent. One of these facts is true, documented, and reported in the audited CAFR. One is complete heresy, backed only by artificially projected, actuarial predictions created by attorneys and accountants designed with the purpose to deceive the public and cause an excuse and justification of financial bailouts with taxpayer money. One is in an actual audited accounting while one is certainly not. Yet in the same breath, we find that this fund is being said to contain an increase in investment assets that currently stands at $350 billion while also being close to insolvency.
If you understand this, then you understand the difference between the yearly budget and the comprehensive (from the beginning) audit called the CAFR. The budget is merely an incomplete, dumbed down (public) version of the CAFR. The budget cannot be fully understood, in fact, without the CAFR, and the budget refers to the CAFR when full public disclosures are undesired. In short, the budget is in no way comprehensive, just as most publicly disclosed information is generally incomplete and designed to deceive through obfuscation and omission of all facts involved. But this is not illegal in any way, for what is comprehensive, the audit itself, is made “publicly available.” The lawmakers are the organized crime syndicate (congress) and its legion of non-governmental organizations, like the private Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB). In other words, the beneficiaries of the crime and of the fees and tax-extortion makes the rules.
But what use is published information in a dumbed down society? The constitution of the United States and of each state are also publicly available, as is the entirety of the US Code and state laws. Does that mean that most people actually know the full, comprehensive law? Does that mean the common citizenry has any idea what the constitution actually states and intends in its rhetoric? Absolutely not, as I have harshly and painfully uncovered in past endeavors. For if they (we) did, they (we) would not voluntarily be contracted in surety to a United States citizenship unless they (we) were actually insane or inept, which not ironically is exactly what such a national citizenship represents — idiocy, wardship, dependence, and a total lack of the ability to self-govern. This is not so different than membership in a pension fund — dependency on government and its law, benefits and restrictions, due to the lack of ability to self-govern ones own financial situation, which is seen by government agencies as the same form of idiocy. Like children, pensioners and employees are given monthly allowances because they could not possibly handle or responsibly manage their own full estate. Even the state lottery schemes are set up to pay its slave-minded winners in default yearly stipends while each lottery fund run by and benefiting government invests for itself the unpaid remainder (lump sum), taking for itself what would be the interest and investment returns that would have gone to the winner if he or she could handle such a responsibility!
But they don’t teach this stuff in public school, now do they?
And yes, again, this multifaceted, duplicitous lie is perfectly legal on the public front. It is your fault if you believe the propaganda without verifying its source documentation and audit. You have no excuse, and neither do those re-reporting this crap and thus inevitably, often unwittingly and unintentionally supporting the oppositional plan behind it all.
The truth hurts… I get it. But at the same time the Truth is the only Real thing that can set anyone free. For the truth may only harm or offend those living in or protected by a lie. Is the pain worth it? In Truth, this is all nothing if not the very self-evident nature and consequence of mammon, and why this love of money (belief in the artificial valuation in money of all things) is the root of all this evil. At this point in this essay, one either accepts their own disposition as accurate (as devised by government through trickery and temptation) or one shoots the messenger for telling the Truth. The ill-informed, extorted, and victimized taxpayer or the ill-informed, exacted from, but also monetarily (artificially) rewarded pensioner… which one are you?
Or are you both? You can’t be one (a pensioner) without being the other (a taxpayer) it seems.
Now, let’s add to our list of ever growing fear-based, unsubstantiated concerns here — some true, some not so much:
CalPERS is somehow publicly stated to be near insolvency.
A “pension fund crisis” (doom) is apparent and seemingly inevitable.
Therefore, CalPERS pension fund may need a taxpayer reform or bailout soon.
This is true and “confirmed” by the public heresy spoken by a board member of CalPERS while not under oath.
CapPERS investment fund value is up to around $350 billion in current assets as of this copied tweet at , an increase from the previous fiscal year CAFR reported and audited earnings of about $25 billion so far for this fiscal year. (Note: the fiscal year for CalPERS ends June 30 each year, so that’s a $25 billion gain in less than 8 months, with four more months of performance gains to go, placing it well over or even double the projected actuarially needed investment gain expectations for the year.)
Despite this, its manager claims the need to possibly recoup from previous years the investment losses from taxpayers (as government funded bailouts for bad investments), ignoring completely the good years that not only make up for it, like this current one, but completely ignoring the fact that the fund is solvent and growing by multi-billions on average every year. The goal is to never publicly reveal these positive,over-expected averages by hiding the CAFR through utter silence about its existence.
Taxpayers already pay for (fund) these pensions with their taxpayer money, called as “government contributions,” listed here as “mandatory contributions,” and now they want more, even if it bankrupts local governments to do so.
Because taxpayer money must be collected and used to pay for these pensions, and despite the fact that these pensions are strictly for government employees and do not benefit the vast majority (around 40 million Californians) as average, common, non-pensioned taxpayersin any way whatsoever, the local governments of all common people may go insolvent because these governments (corporations) cannot pay for their other obligations to those other 38 million or so taxpayers.
To be clear, cities, counties, school districts, etc. may declare a special bankruptcy for municipal corporations because they cannot pay for pension fund contributions using taxpayer money, because the rules of the congress of the United States and of the corporate states require pre-funding of pension funds based on artificial,completely unreasonable actuarial reports by corrupt pension fund managers themselves,which are the cause of any appearance (lie)of any shortage of “future“funding.
–=–
If this last part is not clear, I would point you to my previous exposure of this idiocracy of an investment scam from several years ago, which will bring not only clarity but allow you to do the same simple research into your own local governments within their sourced CAFR audits. You can obtain a city or county CAFR online or at your local library along with the budget report, usually at the resource desk, or as a digital copy online. The amount of assets hidden from each of us by the purposefully obfuscating and inadequate yearly budget report when put in comparison to this full and comprehensive report each year is staggering to say the least. There is literally no such thing as an insolvent government in the United States, including Detroit and Stockton, when considering each governments legally required and CAFR-audited investment funds. But you won’t discover this by reading only the yearly budget, which ignores such accumulated investments returns and interest. There are instead congressional and state laws that purposefully prevent your taxpayer money from being used for taxpayer purposes, even when they are needed. Instead, our taxpayer collections are labeled as “restricted” (for limited use only) by being placed in specialized investment funds, often labeled specifically as “non-governmental” and as “enterprise” funds. The existence of these reserved investment funds is strictly for the purpose of keeping them from being used for any other taxpayer services — to keep them out of the “general fund” (used for “unrestricted” taxpayer use). There is no excuse to not use what is in the general fund, and so these many schemes, pension funds, and other non-governmental (non-taxpayer) and enterprise funds are created to cause funds in the general fund to be transferred out and into those funds that, by law, cannot be used for general purposes (i.e. taxpayer services).
Learn how to quickly spot this “legal” scheme here:
And if you wonder whether this author, that is, myself, is qualified to speak of such things, you can see all of my CAFR research here (many links), including my over 6 hours of documentaries on the subject entitled as The Corporation Nation Part 1 and Part 2: The Great Pension Fund Hoax:
For our purposes, note here that the budget is in no way an official or full audit. The big difference between a basic yearly budget report and this full or “comprehensive” annual report (audit) is that while the CAFR shows everything for every past year as one continuous fund, the budget report shows only assets and liabilities and gains or losses for that particular year. And so one may use that one bad year as an artificially presented and singular public spectacle while ignoring all other average, good, or even extremely great and over-profitable years in between, in order to show falsely that, while over all the fund is incredibly successful and meeting its long-term goals, that one bad year is all they want you to see. If they can focus you on that bad year, and maybe the expected, cyclical bad year from seven years ago due to bad market conditions, thus causing you (the public) to ignore the CAFR report of all good and bad years in balanced combination, then I can cause a fear-based reaction so as to extort even more taxpayer funds while putting forward the scary publictruth (lie) that the fund is in danger of a false-insolvency in the future. Ignore that $350 billion in investments, for you see, through our trickery, it is already somehow pretended to be spent 30 years from now. Nothing to see here…
So that you may see exactly what amounts to the burden for California taxpayers to fund not only these 2 million or so members of the CalPERS system, but the 2,945 CalPERS employees and the over $1 billion paid just as “commissions and fees” to the many, many banks and fund managers involved in this globalist pension investment scheme whether this CalPERS fund wins or loses, let’s take a look at the CAFR (Audit) for both the 2012 and the 2017 fiscal year, and using the currently stated figure above, showing $350 billion in current CalPERS assets.
Firstly, here is an excerpt from one of my older blog entries. In this CAFR-verified report we read:
Press Release
July 16, 2012
External Affairs Branch
CalPERS Reports Preliminary 2011-12 Fiscal Year Performance of 1 Percent.
Real estate portfolio earns nearly 16 percent exceeding benchmark
SACRAMENTO, CA – The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) today reported a 1 PERCENT RETURN on investments for the 12 MONTHS that ended June 30, 2012, falling SHORT of its benchmark that returned 1.7 percent.CalPERS assets at the end of the fiscal year stood at more than $233 BILLION.
–=–
You see, this was labeled as a “bad year,” for the fund only because it was a bad year for the never-ending stock market. This is of course on the surface a seemingly logical though completely fallacious conclusion. For let’s be clear that this CalPERS fund admittedly still gained a 1% profit after all obligations were met! That’s 1% on the over 220 billion they already possess! So they only gained in profit 2.2 billion that year. How sad for them… And so it’s not that the fund lost money or even really did poorly considering the market conditions and over $2 billion of profit it made after all expenses and obligations were paid. No, it’s only that the fund didn’t reach its actuarially (artificially) projected goal set out by purposefully deceitful accountants, attorneys, and politicians, in order to completely deceive the public and raise contributory taxes collected from all local and state governments. It made a profit, but not according to its goals. Thus they report to the public they did not meet their margins, though still gaining a fortune after all benefits and obligations are paid. So the fund publicly lost, even though it privately gained. See how that works? Imagine if you reported a loss to the IRS when in fact you obviously and without question made such a huge profit?
And trust me, the taxpayers or pensioners never get a refund for these extra gains because of the next great or outstanding year in returns, say when the gains are in the 10’s of billions. In fact, if you do the math, this fund literally has enough value listed here that it could pay benefits for 30 years as it stands, and more when considering the death statistics for current employees and retirees.
Meanwhile, on the back page of the news, thousands of California children are starving in the streets.
And so we can see that a gain is being cleverly reported as somehow being a loss. This, again, is done through the magic trick of actuarial prediction (projection). The con goes like this… Our gain is a loss because in the very far off future we predict without proof that we will use that gain of today for expenses in 30 or 40 years. Why? Because we say so. Our paid, corrupt, professional consensus of accountants and attorneys agree and have gave their paid for and therefore completely biased OPINION that within this fiscal year, in fact, instead of making an over $2 billion dollar gain in reality, the fund in fact had an imaginary future loss, which means we must consider actual gains in asset value as a current loss based on future, imaginary projections made by us. Get it?
This is the organized criminal lie called actuarial predictions. And it is what government uses in every case to hide any surplus of taxpayer monies, by sticking it all into investment funds that will pay for projected but often non-existent or revokable future expenses or bond issues, thereby declaring that those funds are unusable today for taxpayer purposes. It’s a brilliant scheme, which is why pension and other government funds are literally called as “schemes.” And this future liability compared to current asset scheme is the sole reason used to declare that governments and government pension funds are “insolvent.” It’s not just a lie, its an incredibly well laid out plan to “legally” (by their own law and license) defraud and steal from all of us while at the same time first building and then depleting these funds for their own globalist gains and total control of the majority stock and thus shareholder votes in all corporations across the globe.
This 2013 report continues by stating something very important… something that seems to be lost on or purposefully ignored by any and everyone victimized by this con game:
“CalPERS 1 percent return is below the fund’s discount rate of 7.5 percent,a long-term hurdle lowered recently in response to a steady decline in inflation and as part of CalPERS routine evaluation of economic assumptions.CalPERS 20-year investment return is 7.7 percent.”
“It’s important to remember thatCalPERS is a long-term investor and one year of performance should not be interpreted as a signal about our ability to achieve our investment goals over the long-term,” said Henry Jones, Chair of CalPERS Investment Committee…”
–=–
And therein lies the very root of all these fear tactics and lies. This is not a publicly made statement, for the public is not supposed to be aware of let alone read the CAFR, let alone be able to understand it and its mystery of schema and terminology. Here we can see that over 20 years, CalPERS is exactly on track with its projected earnings, attaining a 7.7 percent long-term investment return over that time period, which is .7% more than it projects as its goal for total success and indeed sweet, sweet solvency. In other words, as of this 2013 report, there is absolutely no problem whatsoever with the fund itself regarding its entire, long-term or short-term existence. The fund’s criminal mismanagement, on the other hand, is a totally different topic.
Please understand that this is the essential difference between the CAFR and the budget report. The CAFR is the audit for the life (long-term) of the fund, while the budget is merely a yearly report that excludes long-term information such as this. And it is this distinction, this exclusion of vital information, that allows them to lie and raise taxes while hoarding and hiding taxpayer monies (government funds). Obfuscation of facts is everything. As such, here we show conclusive proof in the CAFR that the fund is over-performing beyond actuarial projections, the opposite of what is being publicly reported in a public (global) con to not only raise taxes but cause insolvency in local governments, an act that will inevitably, even necessarily effect the contracts between those local governments and the CalPERS fund, meaning that contracts will be canceled or rewritten so that the pension fund can renege on its promised obligations — the very benefits paid to contributing and non-contributing retirees. The goal is not to save the pension fund, but to cause it even more profits by lowering its obligations through renegotiations with the very cities, districts, counties and other local governments the fund-board is causing to go insolvent. And you wonder why it’s called pension scheme? Same old ponzi under a different name, folks. This is the very essence of “legal” organized crime by government.
To show the purposeful and sometimes even legally (federally) required mismanagement of this pension investment fund, we need not look into the daily routines of its management team, we only need verify whether or not the actual, stated goals of CalPERS investment returns are being met on a long-term basis. If they are, and we find that this fund is still in 2018 holding on to its long-term (20 year) goal of a 7% return on investment, then we know instantly that all of this fear porn and fallacious rhetoric is a big fat budgetary (public) lie designed to cause chaos at the local and state level – a scam to raise and exact more taxpayer money for government investment funds. For remember, if a city, county, district, or other government municipal corporation declares bankruptcy (insolvency), only then can CalPERS and that local government break with its pension contracts and obligations to its members, lowering or cancelling altogether any retirement payments in the interest of becoming a solvent corporation once again.
It’s a scam, folks. It’s a scam I’ve been uncovering for 7 years! I’m going to write a whole book on the subject, perhaps including this essay. In fact, here is a primer for that book, a look at Stockton, Ca and its artificial crisis and fear of bankruptcy, as an in depth examination of the whole scene and public lies accompanying municipal bankruptcy declarations. The municipal world is indeed by a stage for actors to professionally lie.
If you want to understand the game, this is a very long and detailed look into the lie being perpetrated on us all, using pensions and other non-governmental funding means to declare insolvency and renege on contractual obligations to taxpayers and tax-paying pensioners. And all of this is reported every year right in the CAFR (audit) of the Stockton municipal corporation government. They don’t hide their organized crime, they report it openly. They merely don’t speak of the CAFR, so no one bothers to look. It’s the great open secret, the holy grail of government accounting, and no politician lasts long when he either discovers or speaks honestly about it in public forums.
But let’s get back to our artificial California pension problem, shall we? For we have some new facts to compare.
Here’s our list again, which we will expose as a blatant stack of lies:
CalPERS is near insolvency.
A “pension crisis” is apparent.
CalPERS pension fund may need a reform or bailout soon.
This is “confirmed” by the heresy spoken by a board member of CalPERS.
CapPERS investment fund value is up to around $350 billion
Despite this, it recoups investment losses from taxpayers (as government funded bailouts for bad investments).
Taxpayers already pay for (fund) these pensions with taxpayer money, called as government contributions, and listed here as mandatory contributions.
Because taxpayer money must be collected and used to pay for these pensions, and though these pensions for government employees benefit the vast majority (30 million) average non-pensioned taxpayers in no way whatsoever, local governments may go insolvent because they cannot pay for their other obligations to those same taxpayers.
To be clear, cities, counties, school districts, etc. may go bankrupt because they cannot pay for pension fund contributions using taxpayer money.
Now let’s start a new list of that which we can confirm from the CAFR as the audited facts that completely dispute what has been lied to us in the public and parroted in the so-called news of mainstream and alternative rags:
1. CalPERS assets at the end of the fiscal year (in the 2012 CAFR) stood at more than $233 billion.
2. The CalPERS fund’s discount rate or target rate of return is over 7.5% over a long-term or 20 year time period.
3. As of 2012, CalPERS 20-year investment return was reported in the 2012 CAFR at 7.7 percent, .2% higher than needed to meet its future obligations of today.
4. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this fund as of 2012…
At this point we should be able to take this acquired data and compare it to the most recently published CAFR (audit report) in 2017 (five years later) and according to its currently reported assets ($350 billion in 2018) so as to verify whether or not CalPERS itself is having any problems, as loosely reported by ZeroHedge and based only on quotes from its managers, whom by the way it serves well to have a misinformed public not only ignorant of the actual performance of the fund and its management, but also of the very CAFR (Audit) that would expose their blatant lies and purposeful trickery and misrepresentations.
Hint: The fund has grown by over $117 billion in its asset valuation in only 5 and a half years!
Here is a quote directly from the 2013 CAFR:
“CalPERS investments rebounded with a solid net return of 13.2 percent in the 2012-13 Fiscal Year, which is WELL ABOVE our long-term annual average assumption of 7.5 percent. Our 20-year average annual return is 7 6 percent, and our 30-year average is 9.4 percent.
“As of June 30,2013, net position for the Public Employees’ Retirement Fund (PERF) was $262 billion,A GAIN OF $25 BILLION over the previous 12 months.”
Hold up just a minute!
So the 30-year return is actually a whole 1.9% higher than your projected long-term goals? Holy Cow! This thing’s running smoother than a baby’s butt! Obviously this “good” year more than made up for the previous “bad” year, eh? But in the interests of obfuscation towards a public idiocracy, they only publicly used the “bad” year’s temporary results, pretending that the fund is not reaching its long-term goals by focusing attention like a magician on their left hand, only the short-term goal and losses for that one “bad” year while stealing us blind with your right hand, a fully and in fact well over-funded pension plan?
Very clever…
Yet ZeroHedge.com parrots the following “public” (unaudited) information, which stand completely opposite to and absolutely discredited by what is shown in the easy to verify CAFR audit report, if only a bit of due diligence was done before reporting such blatant lies as truths:
“Ironically, it was just a decade ago that CalPERS’ lofty equity allocation resulted in a staggering losses, and the current dead end. The trust fund lost about $100 billion in the Great Recession and never has fully recovered…“
Never fully recovered…? (Insert LOL here)
And what exactly does that mean? What is recovery defined as, anyway? Is the fund short a penny or billions of dollars? Or is this just absolute hogwash? What is that loss based on, exactly? Reality or fiction (actuarial predictions)? Or is this like marking up a resale product only to put it on sale for the same price it already was before its markup? Is this just the grand illusion of future liabilities erasing actual, current assets again? Of course it is…
We just read that this fund is in fact officially reported and audited to be standing far above its short and long-term targeted goals, being completely solvent. So what gives? Something smells very fishy here, and I am confident that I need not hedge my bet that that smell is coming from the empty, unverified yet arrogantly confident rhetoric over at ZeroHedge.com and all other “news” outlets while calling it the facts.
This one’s easy. Let’s test the theory, this empty and ridiculous proposition, that the CalPERS fund lost and has not recovered 100 billion in its portfolio. For we already know that the scene is above target with its long term goals, a fact that alone disproves this lie.
But let’s simply look at the totals again…
To be clear, the fund has indeed risen since 2006, a year or two before this so-called “Great Recession” where the market was drained, monetized, and rewarded to the financial elite (organized criminals). But a “good” that more than makes up for a “bad” year or “recession” they simply don’t like to talk about. This empty statement of the CalPERS fund not being able to recover from the “Great Recession” is just a flat out lie, completely unable to be substantiated in any way, and therefore absolutely ridiculous in every way. But don’t take my word for it. Remember, look at the audit (CAFR), not the public news and dime-a-dozen websites that parrot each other as if they are primarily sourced. These sites are the very reason there is no truth in the truth movement!
From the 2006 CAFR we read:
“Fiscal year 2005-06 was a year of progress for our organization. In November 2005,we reached a milestone of $200 billion in assets. This remarkable achievement reflects our diversified investment strategy and the diligence of our investment staff…”
CalPERS in 2010 – 13.3 % increase with a $23.2 billion gain in net assets after all benefits paid.
“The California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the largest U.S. public pension, earned a 12.5 percent return in 2010, led by gains in private equity and U.S. stocks, Chief Investment Officer John Dear said.
The $228 billion pension fund earned 17.3 percent from domestic equity and 21.5 percent in alternative investments such as private equity, Dear said today. Its real-estate portfolio lost 5 percent while its fixed-income investments gained 12 percent.”
To be clear, in 2010, just 2 years after the so-called “Great Recession,” the CalPERS pension fund is showing a $28 Billion dollar gain in its asset portfolio. Yet the ZeroHedge.com report states clearly that “The trust fund lost about $100 billion in the Great Recession and never has fully recovered,” even though ZeroHedge.com in the same report shows the funds current assets for 2018 standing at #350 Billion, a well over $120 billion gain since then. What gives? How can such irresponsible reporting be accepted by these ZeroHedge.com “fans,” when such an obvious and blatant contradiction is reported in the same article? Amazing…
CalPERS in 2011 – $41.1 billiongain in net assets after all benefits paid in just this one year.
“CalPERS reports 20.7% investment return for fiscal year“
“The California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) reported a 20.7 percent return on investments in preliminary estimates for the one-year period that ended June 30, 2011.
This is our best annual performance in 14 years, said Rob Feckner, CalPERS Board President. For the second straight fiscal year, the Pension Fund exceeded its long-term annualized earnings target of 7.75 percent.”
“CalPERS investments rebounded with a solid net return of 13.2 percent in the 2012-13 Fiscal Year, which is WELL ABOVE our long-term annual average assumption of 7.5 percent.” –Page 4
It’s all about balance, you see? Little reported good years are the cure for over-reported bad years, and there are many more good years than bad years. In fact, it’s so good that CalPERS nest egg has met and overreached all of its long-term goals, despite the open lies (public statements) it tells the public. All one needs to understand is within these audited CAFRs FOR EVERY GOVERNMENT CORPORATION!
But let’s go a step farther here. Let’s look at the 2017 result for the CalPERS fund as quoted in its CAFR (required audit). Here’s the opening statement by its controller to its corporate board:
“November 16, 2017
“Members of the CalPERS Board of Administration:
“I am pleased to present the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS or the System) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.
“Since coming to CalPERS as the new CEO in October 2016, I have focused on ensuring the LONG-TERM sustainability of the System. During this past fiscal year, we took a number of important steps to strengthen the Public Employees’ Retirement Fund (PERF) and move toward our overall goal of fully funding pension benefits promised to members.
“With that goal in mind,I’m pleased to report that as the financial markets have improved,so have our assets. Our investment assets increased by more than $24 billion and stood at $326 billion as of June 30, 2017, compared with $302 billion as of June 30, 2016. The PERF realized a strong 11.2 percent overall net return on investments in Fiscal Year 2016-17 primarily due to the strong performance of financial markets. Our public equity investments had a 19.6 percent net return, followed by a double-digit return of 13.9 percent for private equity investments, and a 7.4 percent return in real assets.”
Oops! That sounds like a good year! Shhhhh! Don’t talk about it to the plebes…
At this point, the reader of this should be extremely pissed off. I mean out of control, torches and pitchforks pissed. But for some reason all I see is calm. Unfortunately, I cannot explain this phenomenon within the confines of this essay, other than to say the Music Man has sold us instruments without teaching us to play them, though we continue to believe we know. Perhaps if we get band uniforms?
Let’s not forget that the beginning of this so-called “news” report (above) shows current totals for 2018 standing at over $350 billion. I remind you that this is up about $48 billion in profit from just 2016 totals, which is less than 2 years. Does that sound like insolvency to you? Where’s the crisis? Where’s the source of all this fear?
Oh, right. There isn’t any. But the board can use government-only accounting principles and future actuarial projections of artificial debt to cause todays profits to just disappear from the balance sheet, which is what we then see on the stripped-down, dumbed-down, yearly budget report. But remember, the individual year means nothing. Just like all of you, at least I hope, you have some savings and/or investments, even your precious gold and silver, to offset these few bad years. The very fact that you have a surplus is the whole point here.
Because so does government! A massive one. And that’s why it invests in so much debt. Debt is not liquid. It can’t be used for taxpayer services. It’s restricted, as are its returns. To invest in debt is to invest in future assets not ready-at-hand today. Thus, as I’ve reported so often in the past, each government invests in each others’ debts, carries loans, and buys up all the toxic debt both public and private it can. To the average goyim citizen, this sounds insane. But ask most billionaires what they invested in to become the billionaires they are, and the answer will most often be “debt.” Government is a collective debt broker, debt investor, and debt forgiver all in one, running debt prisons under private-contract management for all of us credit-hungry morons in the public purview.
But don’t take my word for it, listen to the Donald himself, here with author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, where Trump says it like it is and hints to you how he made his fortune, just like the scheme that all government agencies and elite continue to practice:
–=–
“Debt is a great thing, and to be big and to be very successful, debt is a very useful weapon.”
–Donald Trump, 2010
–=–
Yep, that’s your hero president showing his true, cowardly, feudalistic colors, a false god of gods. That hair must contain magic properties or something…
This form of passive income, the income earned by interest on future debt payments, is what makes or breaks these tycoons and sycophants both in and out of government. Debt is of course a massive tool and hiding place for taxpayer money for pension funds and other government investments on a global scale.
Why? Because investments stuck in future debt cannot be spent today, not until the payments are made on each debt contract, which often barely covers the interest charged. Liquidity is avoided so as to obfuscate taxpayer liabilities. Meanwhile, the interest payments keep pouring in, some even interest only, to the holder of all these loans and debt instruments. And the main holder of debt is government. Perhaps you’ve heard that most of the Social Security fund investments are held through debt instruments? And perhaps you think this is a bad thing? Silly debtor, tricks aren’t just for kids! They’re G-R-E-A-T! Just not for you…
To put this into perspective, while the wealthy elite and government fund managers teach the public through education, entertainment, and outrageously immoral custom to pay our debts at any cost, even towards our own financial well-being, these guys are getting stinking rich off being the holders of the public’s debt. Conflict of interest, perhaps? Of course it is. The entire financial system and its players are a cornucopia of conflicting interests. What exactly do you think organized crime is but the working hand in hand of those who have conflicting interest, hidden behind the publicly displayed illusion of competition?
And all they have to do is passively wait for the payments to come in every month from a completely illiterate, indebted public while they play the moral agents instructing us from birth to be good debt-slaves, to pay our debts, and to respect the authority behind those debts. While they greedily love, purchase, and worship all other’s debt, we the debt-slaves are indoctrinated to despise it and believe that our morality depends upon continuing to struggle to pay the ultimately un-payable interest and fees, as if this will bring financial freedom. We forget that as part of the public, we are under the collective burden of public debt and required to perform accordingly as citizens, while at the same time we are convinced that no personal debt equals freedom. It’s a cosmic, global joke on each of us, since we never seem to understand that we are the punchline. Yet the real version of such personally debt-free financial freedom literally requires exactly what they have created, a completely indebted public brainwashed to pay perpetual (passive) interest payments to fat cats that do nothing but purchase debt contracts (as financial instruments) for profit and passively reap that interest over many years. This is so-called financial freedom (franchise) — the financial enslavement of as many others as possible, sold to the public with a bit of hope that one day (probably in old age) you too can be personally debt free. But your public (performance) debt can never be paid any more than a puppet can perform without its strings.
The income potential here as a debt-contract holder has no limits, except of course what government itself, as the main investor in these same debt securities and other financial instruments, loans, bonds, and mortgages, set and regulate for itself. This, of course, is the ultimate conflict of interest. And public and private pension funds as well as these collective governments in general, are in fact the main investors in all of these toxic and non-toxic debt instruments. They then “legally” combine them, bundle them, sell them, bet on them, use them as collateral, and even give them fancy names. But most important to our topic… they use them exactly as Trump described — as great, financial weapons against all of us.
Perhaps that’s why the call them mortgages. Mort (dead) engagement (pledge). A mortgage is defined as a dead pledge. Of course it is, because the mort-gage is not actually attached to the home. It’s a promise to pay, nothing more. And guess who is the largest investor in mortgage debt and toxic mortgage securities? You got it. Collective government through pension fund and other investment schemes.
If you’d like to see what CalPERS invests in this category, take a look at its investment report again. You’ll be amazed…
And you wonder why Trump is president? The United States is a business, man. It’s just commerce, silly! And your very civil life is an actuarial commercial projection in a fictional commercial district that cons, extorts, exacts, engrosses, taxes, and uses (employs) you at every step.
Now, let us do some quick calculations to see what the numbers above actually represent, when these last few years are accounted for as one continuous fund balance, as shown in the CAFR, where the good years and the bad years are balanced over the total, long-term existence (legal life) of the fund.
In essence, the fund has gained in value from 2013 (a good year), when it stood at $262 billion, and in 2018 the CalPERS portfolio now reportedly stands at $350 billion in its investment value. A bit of simple math means that this fund has had an increase in value since 2013 fiscal year of approximately $88 billion dollars and counting in just this five year period. That works out to be an average of about $17.6 billion gain per year! And remember, this is the amount after all obligations, fees, salaries, and all the other organized criminal activity is paid off.
But does $17.6 billion a year average from this starting point of 2013 cover the goal of a 7.0 growth rate in investment return to meet the long-term (20-year) artificial goals?
Well, 7.0% of the 2013 valuation of the fund ($262 billion) would be, according to my basic, handy-dandy calculator, exactly $18.34 billion. In other words, every year, the stock of corporations and valuation (in mammon) of other combined investments has to magically create an extra revaluation out of thin air of over $18.34 billion dollars in order for CalPERS to meet its artificially projected, actuarial-based (i.e. out of thin air, bullshit) goals.
OMG! This means that the actuarial (out of thin air) projections are off by over 700 million dollars! The sky must certainly be falling!
But wait a minute. This is just a snapshot of 5 years, not 20, or 30 years.
If I look again, I can see that the fund made a $24 billion gain just in 2017, which represents, as the report clearly states: “a strong 11.2 percent overall net return on investments in Fiscal Year 2016-17 primarily due to the strong performance of financial markets.”
“The Public Employees’ Retirement Fund (PERF) realized a money-weighted rate of return (MWRR) of 11.2 percent in Fiscal Year 2016-17 resulting from positive performance across most globally diversified asset classes. Drivers of the PERF’s investment return include strong performances from public equity, private equity and real assets investments. Additionally, fixed income and liquidity asset classes outperformed their respective benchmarks.” –Page 20
“Net investment income increased from $1.4 billion in Fiscal Year 2015-16 to $33.0 billion in Fiscal Year 2016-17, as returns were higher due to strengthened market conditions.” –Page 22
The PERF net position increased by $27.8 billion or 9.3 percent compared with the prior year primarily due to favorable market conditions.” –Page 22
–=–
Well now, that’s a whole 4.2% over the target year goal, now isn’t it? So this was apparently one of those extra good years we aren’t supposed to talk about in the news, right? It messes up the fear equation of only looking at the bad ones.
As a side note, I want people to understand what is happening here. The entire success or failure of these pension funds around the world relies on the stock market. Therefore, they rely on the continuous growth of that stock market worldwide. This means ALL SECTORS must grow, inducing military weapons manufacturing for the profitable war machine and illegal arms sales by our government to its enemies. This means Monsanto and other companies must grow, which means all food must be patented through genetic reorganization and modification, so that the stock can have some legitimate avenue to also artificially grow and cause inflation and other side effects of patenting and monopolization of basic, God-given necessities. And the list goes on. For this pension to grow, so too must corporations, at what is approaching an exponential rate that, while sustainable for the growing pension fund, is wholly unnatural for this polluted earth and its poisoned people. This means more pointless pollution, more waste, more consumption, more credit (debt), and thus more poverty and class division — all in the name of profiteering from corporate investments. This means an unfathomable expansion in the valuation of the money supply — not just the worship of it, but the incremental construction and reinforcement of this system of mammon.
Oh, and by the way, it is actuarially speaking in the best interest of the “plan” that you die at an early age, so that you don’t collect on your retirement benefits. Not ironically, pension funds of course hold huge investments in the pharmaceutical, medical, and food production corporations that will very likely get that actuarially projected job of murder by injection and poisoned food and water intake done, through what these fund managers call and keep as its non-industrial death statistics. It’s sorta like racially motivated genocide, but for age-related funding liability purposes. So it’s pretty much like we are all “contributing” to your own necessarily planned and organized, unnatural demise.
Incidentally though, you’ll be happy to know that “industrial deaths” are extremely low. After all, we don’t want our wage slaves dying until after they retire or get too old to work. It’s not ironic at all that the word retire is a synonym for death, now is it?
To be clear, this thing was designed to fail and thus doomed to fail from the beginning, as any such uncontrollable cancer that grows to live will eventually deplete its resources like a parasite and finally outgrow and kill its host’s ability to keep it alive — just like any ponzi scheme is so designed.
At the very least ZeroHedge.com has figured this part of the game out:
“Last In December we also reported that the increasingly panicked fund, decided to boost its stock allocation to 50% in order to raise its FUTURE LIABILITY discount rate to 7%, as any reduction in stock allocations would also lead to a lower discount rate which in turn which would require more contributions from cities, towns, school districts, etc. and could bring the whole ponzi crashing down.Amusingly, one Calpers board member argued to raise the equity allocation even higher, to 60%, so that the discount rate was greater than the current 7% in order to make the books appears “better.”
–=–
No comment on the grammar, since I self-edit. But come on!
You see, the pieces are all there, but the author of this report just hasn’t put them together because he isn’t looking at the source (CAFR). It’s all about appearances. Form without substance, as any lie is built upon. It sounds good. It causes fear, and that’s all that matters. But think about it, if they can raise the discount rate by just manually altering the actuarial projections of what will be future liabilities, and can cause the books appear better than they are by the same method, then we instantly know the whole thing is a lie. We know instantly that they are fudging the actuarial numbers in an effort to hide current assets and massive gains for the fund for the sole purpose of extracting even more “contributions” from taxpayers, through mandatory funding of governmental pensions by cities, counties, districts, states, etc.
The ZeroHedge.com author at least gets it right here when he refers to the psychopathy and sophistry of the average pensioner in defense of that which feeds or will feed their passive lives and incomes based on bankrupting their own local and state governments, where he states:
“However, the CalPERS board, dominated by public employee organizations and sympathetic politicians, has spurned such pleas: it is almost as if, once promised generous retirement benefits, public workers would rather take the entire system down,than see their own pensions reduced, even modestly.“
–=–
Again, this attitude of the average pensioner is a parasitic, even narcasistic mentality. It is best described as the opinion of a completely dependent wage-slave that knows not or callously dismisses the burden he puts on others to fulfill his goals. The hardest thing for a pensioner to hear is that pensions are nothing but welfare for the middle class, and that to fulfill these pension schemes just for federal employees, cost taxpayers nationally over $1 trillion dollars, more than even the taxes for education.
For the harsh truth, see my essay on the welfare system itself as compared to pensioners, whom even as they receive their taxpayer funded, passive retirement (welfare) checks each month, are the loudest criers of “foul” towards the extremely underfunded and relatively tiny public taxpayer funds used to support the actual “Welfare system” in the United States. It’s shocking to see and compare these statistics, and is certainly a destruction of any egotistic, fallacious arguments made by pensioners and fund managers:
It’s a simple equation, really, that anything that must grow to survive will eventually overgrow its available resources, and thus must be destroyed or allowed to destroy that which feeds it. It’s your basic parasite/host model, really, with accountants, attorneys, and brokers leading the charge. And so the fear porn we are seeing now is more to nip this exponential, actuarially projected growth in the butt before it actually begins to cause a serious problem and expose pensions for the scam (scheme) they are. And so they will suck this fund dry and leave all of us out to dry, pensioners and taxpayers alike. We are all the unwitting victims of this ponzi scheme, and bankruptcy is the most logical and “legally” legitimate move they can make. But remember, de facto means illegitimate, and that’s what our United States and State governments are as municipal corporations. So we shouldn’t be at all surprised.
And that makes me wonder if the CAFR tells us wether or not the 20-year goal is still over its projected target, which would mean all of this fear is for nought!
Well of course it does:
SOLVENCY TEST
“Exhibit B, Funding Progress — Solvency Test, demonstrates System solvency as measured using the System’s own assumptions and liability calculation methods.” –Page 119
So the fund is quite solvent after all. What a shocker…
Where’s this information in your many fearful reports and warnings, Mr. Zero Hedge, and for that matter every other news outlet that supports this artificial, nihilistic pension scheme propaganda?
But how does this possibly compute, considering our CalPERS board member is blathering and waxing philosophically quite the opposite in his public account (lies), that the fund is inexplicably, dangerously close to insolvency and that we should all be very, very afraid?
What kind of test is this inside, system-wide “solvency test” anyway?
From the CAFR:
“A short-term solvency test is one means of checking a system’s funding progress. In a short-term solvency test, the plan’s present assets (investments and cash) are compared with 1) member contributions on deposit, 2) the liabilities for future benefits to persons who have retired or terminated, and 3) the liabilities for projected benefits for service already rendered by active members. In a system that employs level contribution rate financing, the liabilities for member contributions on deposit (liability 1) and the liabilities for future benefits to present retirees (liability 2) will be fully covered by present assets, except in rare circumstances.”
“In addition, the liabilities for service already rendered by members (liability 3) will be partially covered by the remainder of present assets. Generally, if the System has been using level contribution rate financing, the funded portion of liability 3 will increase over time.” –Page 121
So according to the audited reporting of current assets, that is, when current assets are taken into consideration instead of being magically ignored, then suddenly everything is right as rain.
For the 10 or so years I’ve been following this particular pension fund, I now can report that I have seen it grow by over $120 billion dollars. And yet all the while its agents have stated time and again that somehow the fund is also, at the same time it grows, dangerously close to being a problem. As I uncovered above and in my previous research on this blog, it’s actually a really simple concept. Just hide what assets you have today by claiming that they magically disappear when considering the debts of tomorrow. But only government can do this type of quirky accounting. Imagine if you told the IRS that the $60,000 dollars you earned as your paycheck couldn’t be counted as assets today because of all your future payments you’ll have to make on your home, car, and kids college fund over the next twenty or thirty years. Well, that’s exactly what government gets to do with its actuarial projective nonsense. Its law is its own. It’s all about balance… that is balancing billions and billions of dollars today by pre-spending them as future liabilities.
You can read all about this little trick here:
It’s not like this is the first time, nor will it be the last, that the accounting gurus at CalPERS use the bad year scenario to try and ramrod even more mandatory contributions and the false flag fear of insolvency down the publics throat.
In fact, I started my article out with exactly this same scenario back in 2013, when the newspaper rags were reporting exactly what this present article is demonstrating. This is called predictive programming. There is no surprise. They did exactly what they warned they would do, using these same fear tactics back then.
Here’s my blog from 2013:
USA Today put out the following story in 2012, which was of course originally printed from the false-news clearing house, Associated Press (AP):
“SACRAMENTO, Calif. – The nation’s largest public pension fund collected a dismal 1% annual return on its investments, a figure far short of projections that will likely bring pressure on California’s state and local governments to contribute more money, officials said Monday.
The return reported by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System was well below its projected return of 7.5% for the fiscal year that ended June 30.
The investment returns are critical BECAUSE TAXPAYERS ARE ON THE HOOK FOR THE DIFFERENCE if the pension funds fail to meet their performance targets.
“The last 12 months were a challenging period for all investors as the ongoing European debt crisis and slowing global economic growth increased market volatility and reduced equity returns,” said chief investment officer Joe Dear. “It’s a clear reminder that we must remain focused on performance, risk and internal controls in today’s financial environment.”
The fund was most impacted by a negative -7% return on global equities. Half the pension’s assets are in equities, Dear said.
The fund, known as CalPERS, runs a$234 billion pension system for more than 1.6 million state employees, school employees and local government workers…”
–=–
In this first three paragraphs we can see the entire scam (scheme) spelled out in front of us, as told from a master story-teller who is trying to sell sunglasses to a blind man. But even a blind man should be able to read between the lines here…
So far, we have learned that the CalPERS Pension fund has earned a 1% increase in its investment portfolio, which for this now past year would have been over $2.2 billion dollar in gains on investments. Yes, that’s $2,200,000,000 when spelled out properly. And this is of course reported as bad news!
–=–
Sound familiar? Same scary pig, different scary lipstick. Same rhetoric, same threats, same lies.
And gee, look what happened. Exactly what they predictively programmed us would happen. Local governments ended up paying more taxpayer money to the pensions instead of to taxpayer services as it should. All this because pensioners don’t fund their own retirement, and instead rely on all of us to keep them comfy as they do nothing but expect more salary in retirement than most taxpayers make while working. Isn’t that nice.
Hey, dummy, it was planned this way from the beginning!
Never forget, this is organized crime, disguised as legitimate government.
When you lose they win. When you win, they win.
In another 5 or 6 years we will look back at this “news” report and have a good laugh again at how we were predictively programmed as to what would happen and did nothing to stop it. And the fund will probably be up to over $400 billion by then, even as we will find board its members still claim to be in fear of insolvency, while we find ourselves in the middle of the largest collective local governments bankruptcy scheme in history, while these pensioners find themselves up shit creak without a paddle or toilet paper.
What was it that Samuel Johnson defined pensioners as back in the pre-United States corporation 1700’s?
PENSION – An allowance made to any one without an equivalent. In England, it is generally understood to mean pay given to a state hireling for treason to his country. (Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1755)
–=–
Could extortion and exaction of taxpayer money from all the resident, common people in each territorial State as citizenships of the nation to pay for all state hireling pensioners retirement benefits be considered as treason to ones country? I’ll leave you to decide that one. {Hint: your country is your State (land) and people thereof, not your nation (district), though they call the nation colloquially as “the state.” And all local and state governments are under federal (national) law and funding. You do the math.}
In the notes to financial statements section we find some pieces of the root cause of what in public appears to be some issues with the fund, but in reality (when audited) we find they are all just made up actuarial projections and unnecessary contractual obligations.
USE OF ESTIMATES IN THE PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates…
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
…The total pension liabilities and net pension liabilities disclosed in Note 8 to the Basic Financial Statements for the cost-sharing multiple-employer and single-employer defined benefit pension plans are measured based on certain assumptions,including the long-term rate of return on pension investments, inflation rates, and employee demographics, all of which are subject to change…
Due to uncertainties inherent in the estimations and assumptions processes described in this section, it is at least reasonably possible that changes in these estimates and assumptions in the near term would be material to the financial statements…
Upon initial investment with a general partner, CalPERS commits to a certain funding level for the duration of the contract.At will, partners may request that CalPERS fund a portion of this amount.
TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES — ALL FUNDS: $818,667,000
Total Management Fees: $513,556,000
Total Management and Performance Fees:$598,795,000
Total Consultant and Professional ServicesExpenses $331,645
–=–
Did I mention that all these banks, brokerage houses, and other “administrative” and “management” corporations are also stock-owned corporations held by this very pension fund? This gets ridiculous after a while… and predictable.
So let’s put this into the proper long-term perspective, which is the whole point of this integral CAFR auditing report system:
In 2017, local and state governments paid $12.4 billion in “mandatory contributions” from taxpayer money into just the fiduciary funds of this one government pension scheme (Page 40 of 2017 CalPERS CAFR), which was increased around $10 billion from just the previous year!
Now lets compare this number, which represents non-pensioner taxpayer money from ALL Californian residents (taxpayers) as government contributions to this one fund, to the reported budget deficit (another lie when researched in the CAFR) reportedly suffered by California taxpayer base. Could there possibly be a correlation? LOL!
How can taxpayers sit back and watch as the same amounts they are paying to fund pension funds are causing, at the same time, the budget report to be short by that same amount or more? This is group insanity.
Here is yet another very recent example of this completely fallacious and unchecked, unverified fear porn being pushed to support this false flag bankruptcy scam and bailout of a well-over-funded pension plans. Nowhere, of course, is the CAFR mentioned within this article. Notice right off that it states pensions are under water by $1.4 trillion, even while our CalPERS alone reports assets that equal almost 30% of 1.4 trillion. There are thousands of public pension plans across the United States, big and small, and all of them are as successful as CalPERS because they all are essentially required to invest the same. So where is this great flood and crisis? It simply does’t exist.
After several years of steady investment growth and higher contributions from taxpayers,most of America’s public sector pension plans are still awash in red ink.
(**Authors note: this is a totally contradicting statement! We are highly successful but also a failure. LOL!)
According to a new reportfrom the Pew Charitable Trusts, the states collectively carry more than $1.4 trillion in pension debt—and only four states have at least 90 percent of the assets necessary to meet their long-term obligations to retirees. The Pew paper, which is based on states’ 2016 financial reports, shows that pension debt increased by about $295 billion since the previous year, making 2016 the 15th consecutive year in which state-level pension debt increased.
(**Authors note: Yet according to those CAFR’s this is a completely impossible statement… unless the problem isn’t the massive profits and gains, but that the actuarial reporting and projections are where the whole scam exists. It matters not how much they make, the accountants can always make their projections higher than their profit model. In this way, we will never see any recovery, because even though it has already fully recovered, they can change their actuaries to show the opposite. In other words, you, the taxpayers, can’t win. This is ultimate corruption.)
The really scary part is that pension debt keeps increasing despite the fact that taxpayers’ contributions to state-level pension plans have doubled as a share of state revenue in the past decade. Also worrisome: Pension plans are chasing increasingly risky investments. The gap between returns on safe investments and state pension plan investment assumptions was the highest in decades, the Pew researchers note, leaving pensions more vulnerable to market volatility and raising concerns that another downturn could drive already deeply indebted systems over a cliff.
(**Authors note: Key word: SCARY! But untrue, just the same. Pension debt does not keep increasing, obviously, because these profits reported in the CAFR are after all obligations are paid. There is only actuarial false projections that cannot be met, made completely out of thin air without reference to reality, that causes the appearance of debt 30 years in the future. Today, however, there is absolutely zero debt, or there would be no profits and gains over that which the fund is obligated to pay out as liabilities each year. This is all a big fat lie based on creative accounting tricks — the hiding of current, tangible assets with the projection of future debts that do not exist today and that will not be paid (amortization schedule) for 30 years! Now imagine again if you told the IRS that you cannot pay them today because you will have to pay them way in the future, which counts against your assets today? You’d be put in jail for fraud! To be clear, the system is not indebted, but the opposite, it is the holder of others debt instruments as a profit model.)
Higher contributions from taxpayers and good returns in the market should bring well-structured pension plans back to good health. But only four states—New York, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin—have at least 90 percent of the necessary assets to cover their retirement liabilities, Pew says.
(**Authors note: At this point, they are just talking out of their ass, with nothing backing up their statements but the lies they create.)
There are two problems here. One is embedded in the very design of public sector pension plans. The other involves the politicians who are trusted to keep those plans funded properly….
(**Authors note: Finally, something everyone can agree on!)
The systemic problem is that pension plans generally assume unrealistic investment returns…
Of course, every dollar spend on public pensions is a dollar that state’s can’t spend on roads,schools,or anything else…
Removing politicians from the equation is a major benefit of transitioning away from traditional defined benefit pension plans and into 401(k)-style plans where individual workers control their retirement accounts. That also helps get taxpayers off the hook for having to make up the difference when markets or political will falls short of pension plans’ expectations.
But for now, taxpayers will continue to pay more to finance public sector workers’ retirements—and another recession could be a catastrophic blow for all involved.
The Pew Research Center was founded originally as the Times Mirror Company, a newspaper conglomerate, and thus a corporation that is majority owned by stock investment by government. Round and round… you get the picture.
There is a maxim of law that applies to each of us, at every moment of every day, and especially to this scheme happening right out in the open.
–=–
“Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived.”
–Qui vult decipi, decipiatur. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
“One cannot complain of having been deceived when he knew the fact and gave his consent.”
–Nemo videtur fraudare eos qui sciunt, et consentiunt. Dig. 50, 17, 145. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
“He is not deceived who knows himself to be deceived.”
–Non decipitur qui scit se decipi. 5 co. 60. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)
–=–
Now you know, but knowing is only half the battle, as G. I. Joe reminds us.
We are deceived not merely through trickery and word (and number) magic, but because most of us are happy in our deceit — happy because we have not foreseen the consequences of our purposeful ignorance and inaction.
Now I could go on and on rehashing what I’ve already reported in my countless CAFR articles, movies, and radio shows, but there is really no point. If you don’t get it after this, then you simply won’t ever get it.
Here at the end is where people ask for solutions. I tell them time and again there is no such thing in the legal world, and that the word solution means one and only one thing — the end of contract. This global takeover will not be fixed from within their own system that they control and make the law over, and it will not be solved by you or any other contracted citizenship acting in the property (person) of government. It will only stop when you stop respecting it, stop contracting with its agents, stop using its money (property) and relishing in its debt, stop preforming under its contractual law of citizenship, and start self-governing without such artificial means, the only means that governments can provide.
Globalism is upon us, and I have just laid out its financial and control-grid blueprint and why each of us is personally responsible for making it happen. It cannot be defeated, for it is not ours to defeat or change. But it can be avoided, as can national and global citizenship, the digital ID in the virtual world of this coming Beast system. One thing is for sure, their network of financial enslavement will never die until the common citizenry stop allowing themselves to be deceived by it, stop participating in it, and most importantly, stop respecting any value whatsoever in its currencies, stocks, and instruments.
I won’t hold my breath…
Hell, I can’t even get an interview anymore, for no-one wants to hear the truth.
And so I leave this wealth of knowledge and collective research is here for posterity, so that someone may know that at least there were some that tried to change the course of these gods. But alas, Huxley’s Brave New World model shines true, so I think I’ll just grab a bong and a lawn chair and watch the shitshow play out.
See you on the other side, if you figure out the code.
.
–Clint < richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, May 11th, 2018
What a fantastic article! Scary as hell. I have know about the retirement scheme for some time (CalPers). Anyone who doesn’t take this seriously and protect themselves are fools. Thank you for your research and time. I will post of FB, and send email in Sacramento.
thank you for this document which shows more of the fraud and theft against the government employees of CA. There is a video on youtube about the actual way that the CalPERS is rigged to hid the excess money from the pensioners. It is about 3-4 hours of detailed evidence of the fraud.
After much reflection on over 25 years of “trying to wake people up” Ive decided that %90 of Americans, of all races are “autistic” (too medically/neurologically damaged) and will never understand the predicament they are in. In other words we are talking to brick walls.
Hey Clint I was just reading some of this and one thing for sure the proof of the coverup or hiding of the our money is all laid out for us. we just got to figure out how to get the zombified people of this country to do anything! you’ve probably already seen this stuff, but please keep up the good work. and man I know you got to be burnt out on this stuff, it is exhausting Ive been into this “truth” crap for about 25 years now and it can kinda make’s you numb. thank you.
As a deep researcher into what is jokingly called the economy, I am getting real tired of “economists” and their dyer warnings of eminent monetary failure and thus the collapse of the so-called U.S. “economy.” I am not an economist. In truth, anyone who claims to be one is quite frankly full of shit.
So why did I title this rant as such?
First of all, let’s dispel the fallacy that the United States needs currency to rule. The United States is a military dictatorship, a fact that I will be proving beyond any doubt in my upcoming documentary film in 2015, God willing. It is ridiculous to then consider that the United States is propped up merely by money, especially when it creates that money magically through appropriation without providing new collateral. In reality, the fiat currency is nothing more or less than debt. It is promises to pay that will never be paid, for no debt can ever be paid with debt. The United States is a bankrupt corporation, as James Trafficant stated in congressional record, and a bankrupt cannot create anything but more debt.
As stupid humans, we are trained and conditioned to believe that the dollar represents something tangible with a somehow intrinsic value. I assure you it does not. But if my word isn’t good enough for you in all of your religious fervent belief and faith for said notes of mammon, let’s hear straight from the horses mouth.
The Federal Reserve, in its publication Modern Money Mechanics, states the following:
While currency is used for a great variety of small transactions, most of the dollar amount of money payments in our economy are made by check or by electronic transfer between deposit accounts. Moreover, currency is a relatively small part of the money stock.
In the United States neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a dollar bill is just a piece of paper, deposits merely book entries. Coins do have some intrinsic value as metal, but generally far less than their face value.
What, then, makes these instruments – checks, paper money, and coins – acceptable at face value in payment of all debts and for other monetary uses? Mainly, it is the confidence people have that they will be able to exchange such money for other financial assets and for real goods and services whenever they choose to do so.
Who Creates Money?
Changes in the quantity of money may originate with actions of the Federal Reserve System (the central bank), depository institutions (principally commercial banks), or the public. The major control, however, rests with the central bank.
The actual process of money creation takes place primarily inbanks.’ As noted earlier, checkable liabilities of banks are money. These liabilities are customers’ accounts. They increase when customers deposit currency and checks and when the proceeds of loans made by the banks are credited to borrowers’ accounts.
In the absence of legal reserve requirements, banks can build up deposits by increasing loans and investments so long as they keep enough currency on hand to redeem whatever amounts the holders of deposits want to convert into currency. This unique attribute of the banking business was discovered many centuries ago.
It started with goldsmiths. As early bankers, they initially provided safekeeping services, making a profit from vault storage fees for gold and coins deposited with them. People would redeem their “deposit receipts” whenever they needed gold or coins to purchase something, and physically take the gold or coins to the seller who, in turn, would deposit them for safekeeping, often with the same banker. Everyone soon found that it was a lot easier simply to use the deposit receipts directly as a means of payment. These receipts, which became known as notes, were acceptable as money since whoever held them could go to the banker and exchange them for metallic money.
Then,bankers discovered that they could make loans merely by giving their promises to pay, or bank notes, to borrowers. In this way, banks began to create money. More notes could be issued than the gold and coin on hand because only a portion of the notes outstanding would be presented for payment at any one time. Enough metallic money had to be kept on hand, of course, to redeem whatever volume of notes was presented for payment.
Transaction deposits are the modem counterpart of bank notes. It was a small step from printing notes to making book entries crediting deposits of borrowers, which the borrowers in turn could “spend” by writing checks, thereby “printing” their own money.”
–=–
Can you see past the illusion?
Do you see that the so-called debt doesn’t actually represent anything at all in reality?
Do you understand that debt is the basis of all religion, and that your belief and fear in it is all that substantiates it?
When this system of monetized fakery was created, its goal was not to create wealth. For money is not wealth, it is the opposite of wealth. It is debt. It must be traded in exchange for wealth to fools. If an entire nation and planet of people can be made to believe that this debt is actually a credit, then the debt can be traded for actual wealth. In other words, an entire people can somehow be made to believe that everything in reality can be traded for merely a promise to pay, and that this promise to pay is the same as the payment itself.
As Whimpy perpetually says, we will be paid Tuesday for a hamburger today… but Tuesday never comes.
As I have shown in triplicate, government has done just that. It has created the currency, traded it for corporate stocks, foreign currencies, real estate, precious metals, and anything else representative of real wealth to the point that, as Walter Burien claims via the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reporting (CAFR) system of government accounting: “Government owns it all through investment.”
–=– Why America Is No Longer Needed –=–
Rome is not stationary. It’s empire extends to every corner of the globe, and its center continuously relocates itself. Its name changes as its fraud is re-discovered, re-establishing itself as the need arises. And this is when the crash comes – the revolutions of past empires.
But revolution means to revolve back to the beginning; to start over again. Same empire, different name. This is why so many movies and other media is predictively programming us to support such revolutionary dissonance. Our ideas are very seldom our own, and obviously neither are our ideals of morals and values. Entertainment enters and holds our minds in whatever political thought processes the military ruler wishes to bore into its subjects. As a former Hollywood sound guy, I have seen the script-changes ensuring favorable praise and pro-government propaganda first hand, to the chagrin of writers that are paid more “money” to cooperate or else get their projects shelved.
In other words, we literally sell our souls for debt. We worship it. We trade assets for promises to pay. And we even hoard the debt notes in the illusion of security, as if debt equals safety. Unfortunately, our unreasonable belief and faith in this debt money (the devil’s currency) has lead us to covet the very thing that is killing us slowly. We therefore defend these promises to pay even to the point of war and violent oppression of the entire planet, giving blind and unwavering support to our dictators in congress and in the militarized Executive branch to kill in our (the people’s) name for the protection of our own disease of debt in its world domination.
But things are about to change…
The world is completely taken over. Almost every sense of resistance to the United Nations and what is deemed the “New World Order” by every president in recent memory has been squelched and replaced with “friendly” regimes. It is now common practice for the United States to arm both sides of every conflict while training “peace-keepers” to take over when the U.S. military withdraws from its illegal occupation in undeclared war, usually via Executive Order or other Executive (forceful) violence.
The fall of Iran seems to be the last great international challenge. Iran stands as the last hold out. And it is more demonized with every passing day.
Russia, China, and other imaginary enemies fill up the interim, but don’t be fooled. Government investments in China are why China is any power at all. And Russia wasn’t just allowed to build up its infrastructure because the United States was asleep. U.S. bases are in every state and in every nation around the world. These are not peaceful settlements, they are military occupations. No money is needed. It is rule by force, not by economics!
But with all of this military might, how is it that the U.S. will “crash?”
In the art of war, the assassin must be killed once its job is done. The United States has all but served its purpose. It has assassinated all resistance. It’s culture (which is a lack of established culture and moral law) has been infused with most other nations. Its fake currency has bought up the world “economy,” and that wealth can easily be transferred out to the world bank, leaving the people of America hopelessly destitute. With trained peace-keepers keeping the violent peace under United Nations’ purview, the centralization of military power can now be unilaterally acquired by the U.N. The United States as a mere member state of the United Nations can and is being equalized with all others.
The necessary symbolic crash of the United States central bank and currency is absolutely a requirement for global governance, where all nations are equal as the states of this United States are pretended to be. The centralized power as military force of the United States must be dismantled for the Roman phoenix to rise in its new form of global governance. And the only way to accomplish such a seemingly impossible feat is to play the only card left in the deck – the illusion of economic collapse through the “crash” of the fake currency.
Only if the people believe in that currency as real and intrinsic can this be accomplished, just as the Federal Reserve reports above.
Why is the mainstream news now sound-biting the horrors of the Fed and propagandizing the notion of “End The Fed” as a rallying cry? Does that really make sense considering that government is the majority stock-holder of all media agencies and stocks them with Operation Mockingbird parrots of the CIA, even while it saber-raddles for the destruction of Iran? Why is the totally controlled news constantly injecting fear-porn into the general public about the eminent financial crash of America? Why is it selling gold and storable food while continuously warning about earthquakes, economic upheaval, world war, and emergency preparedness?
The answers should be obvious.
The United States has done its job; its drugged, dumbed-down population used as cannon fodder as paid mercenaries for the military corporation. The borders are open. It’s business globalized. It’s independence subverted.
The shadow of America is the corporation 10 miles square called the United States corporation. And the 50 individual states that we romantically call “America” have fallen prey to their own so-called central government, where the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto are indeed the verifiable written law. The shadow of forced unionization has destroyed an unwitting people that have no idea they are proclaimed as enemies of their own central foreign state, that their shadow military occupies each of the 50 states under Leiber Code statutes, and most importantly that their currency is and always has been nothing but debt obligation and enslavement – the land of the free subjects; a cruel joke played out through an un-winnable game of monopoly at gunpoint.
The reality is that the national debt (a negative) can be abolished and jubilee’d tomorrow with the swipe of a presidential or congressional pen. It doesn’t exist in nature. It is born and will die on legal paper. But its power of illusion is so strong that the fiction of government and its fake money will cause reality to crumble right along with it. The gambling house called the stock market may crash into obscurity, but the ownership in international corporations will remain as the real wealth is transferred away. For a stock’s value is meaningless because what it is valued in is worthless debt in the form of promises to pay. It is the ownership that is important, representing controlling stake in all corporations despite what debt currency it is monetized and valued in. For all currencies are merely debt.
There are no banks left, for there is no lawful (real) money left to be banked. Deposit institutions are not banks, they are debt brokers. If you don’t understand this, then go try and deposit a gold bar or coin into “Wells Fargo Bank” or “Bank of America” – banks in name only. You cannot. No reality allowed. You can only rent a box to safely deposit your tangible property and hope it isn’t confiscated like in the last so-called “banking emergency.” Checking accounts only house promises to pay and nothing else.
The shadow government is killing its creator.
And belief in its own declared, de facto, prima facie evidence of legitimacy is all it will take to deliver the final blow.
It will be our own sons and daughters as career mercenaries that will be our own peace-keepers at home. Their uni-forms already bear the United Nations regalia and patch-mark.
.
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Sunday, December 21th, 2014
—————————————————————————- Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution Part II: Squaring The Past —————————————————————————-
–=–
Welcome to Part two of this essay series. Continuing from where we left off, the comprehension in the reader that the constitution of the United States – thanks to multiple declared “national emergency’s” – is no longer a part of the current political setting in America or the world must be clear. The constitution grants no rights to men. It has no power but that wielded from its congress, interpreted by Congress’s statutory court under the Executive Branch, and whether constitutional or unconstitutional, the laws of government are enforced violently by that Executive Branch under military rule (Lieber Code). Having been verified in the U.S. Code, from within the congressional record, and through the obvious and blatant actions of Congress and the Executive, acknowledging the constitution’s suspension is a necessary step in overcoming the cognitive dissonance continuously shrouded over us through govern-ment (mind control) and the distraction of enter-tain-ment (the entering and holding of the mind). The constitution is used today as nothing more than a religious (Ecclesiastical) and unquestioning tool of justification (Justice) for government to commit atrocities in its tyranny – romanticized abuse. This understanding that the Executive Branch (the military enforcement arm) of the United States government is no longer bound to Congress (by its own choice) or by the constitution itself is a prerequisite for continuing down this road of discovery and sobriety.
If this is not clear, I would suggest going back to the prerequisite part 1 of this essay, here:
Some will turn away from this information, stating as a defense that they have faith in government and in their particular corporate church.
But how is faith defined legally within the church and govern-ment?
From black’s Law 1st edition:
FAITH. 1. Confidence; credit; reliance. Thus, an act may be said to be done “on the faith” of certain representations. 2. Belief; credence; trust. Thus, the constitution provides that “full faith and credit” shall be given to the judgments of each state in the courts of the others. 3. Purpose; intent; sincerity; state of knowledge or design. This is the meaning of the word in the phrases “good faith” and “bad faith”. In Scotch law. A solemn pledge* an oath. “To make faith” is to swear, with the right hand uplifted, that one will declare the truth.
Remember the sacramentum; the sacred oath? Remember the God Trust as the full faith and credit of the United States and its dollar that holds you, your children, and your property as surety and collateral? And don’t you wonder why the constitution would simply assume that the judgements of any court of law is automatically good for everyone in every state, very much like the doctrine of religion? Does that sound like a fair trial to you?
As a “state of knowledge”, faith represents ignorance as “belief without fact”. Is that really where God would want his children to be – lead by the bloodline of royal corporations as governments who demand faith over reason and nature? The Bible says no.
Join me now for a pictorial and documented view of the United States and its history like you’ve never seen it before…
–=– A Dark Authority –=–
Perhaps you, as I have for so long, have wondered where exactly the “Authority” of government comes from?
What gives police authority to beat my head, shoot, or Taze me?
What gives the president the authority to declare an emergency and militarily force all people to comply with his rules?
Does it come from the people; in the form of the consent of the governed to be ruled by force?
Well, one might very well answer yes to this question after enduring a selective public education sponsored by that same government authority. But what if 49% of the people do not agree with that lawful authority? Must they really just grin and bear its tyranny, even if the corruption in that government is so blatant and scattered all over the news as to be a way of life instead of just random events?
Can the quorum of voices of the people through their “representatives” in Congress really force all of the people to comply with its will and law through the military rule of the Executive?
Does that really sound like a free country to you – where your liberties can be stripped away from you by the vote of the other people in a majority over you? Is that a republic?
If I were to challenge this perceived authority as an individual outside of that group-think mentality, I would need to challenge each office of government, starting from the lowest level of that government Beast. I would have to follow the chain of authority of all public officials, from police to police chiefs to Sheriffs to judges to councilmen to mayors to Governors to State legislators and senators… and finally I would be re-directed all the way up to the Federal level of the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches and Cabinets, and then finally to the man himself – the President of the United States. For each of these officials would indeed claim to answer to the authority of the one above themselves as the origin of their own perceived legal authority, but only after trying to convince me that as one of the “people” the president actually gets his power from me. And he will say this even when I outright declare him a criminal, smiling ear to ear in arrogance at my petulance while attempting to convince me that his authority is in fact the law of the people – of myself. I am apparently “the people”, though I have no voice…
But if finally I were to then challenge the authority of the President of the United States himself… to whom would he then point above him? Is it possible that there is a power higher than the President that he claims to receive his authority from? Of course, his public answer and claim of authority would be derived in full circle back to the fallacious lowest level of the “consent of the governed” – the power of the people as a body politic of one, with only one voice – despite the 10’s or 100’s of millions who do not agree.
E Pluribus Unem – out of many, one.
So here is the true test of this word authority…
What happens when I challenge the authority of the people – of the body politic – as nothing but an authoritarian, indoctrinated mob led by government over myself and my natural rights with no clue that the people are harming themselves by their blind delegation of power to government?
What happens if I don’t agree that 51% of the people can vote to allow a corrupt government to take away my liberties, especially on known-to-be-rigged computer voting machines? And if government is based on the consent of all the people as one collective voice, what happens if one of those people no longer consents to being a part of that group-think model? What if one individual stands up and says no? Can a people really be free if any one of them are forced to obey a morally reprehensible law simply because the majority of people around them ignorantly acquiesce to granting government the authority to enforce that law? If government passes laws while in the same sentence exempting itself from its own laws, can we really call what we have in America today lawful, when the law is provably lawless?
So where can I possibly be directed to at this point to ask the people – after following this chain of mythical authority all the way to the top level of U.S. President and finally back to myself – where as part of a group of people without knowledge or comprehension I somehow authorize myself to be abused, mistreated, extorted from, stolen from, kidnapped, imprisoned, quarantined, and even killed?
Where, oh where does this authority come from?
Now that I know that the President’s power derives from myself, as one of the people, I still have the same question: Who or what gives authority to government? And for that matter, who or what gives authority to the people or to the Constitution of the United States?
I know what the answer is not, because it certainly is not me! And yet I am supposedly lumped in as a part of the people…?
It is with great horror that I must inform you that I have finally found the answer to these questions after many years of searching… and it isn’t good.
You see, we must realize that civil legal law and code – the law of men – is a law that cannot be enforced except with the use of violent force and duress. After all, what good is a Congress or a Judicial opinion if that opinion or law is not backed up by an army of security guards to force the people into accepting and obeying those laws and opinions?
So the first hard lesson we all need to comprehend is that any and all man-made law absolutely requires the force of law, either defensive or offensive. For voluntary taxes to be paid, punishments and consequences must be made to force payment of those voluntary taxes – for who would voluntarily pay for and support their own tyranny and enslavement unless forced or manipulated by govern-ment (mind control)?
Governments must make all things illegal before it can control the populace by issuing licenses to legally commit an illegal act.
And by punishing those who act without permission from government for even the most trivial of things, the authority of government is created through perceived fear. The government’s law must turn natural rights into political government granted rights (revokable privileges and benefits) in order to establish a true fascist society. And if you haven’t noticed lately, that is exactly what the federal United States government has done to America…
But still the question remains – why do 100’s of millions of people allow a few hundred congressional, judicial, and executive employees of the United States practice fascism right out in the open? Is the lack of knowledge and recognition of just what fascism is really that prevalent? Is ignorance really that blissful? Are meager benefits really worth the tyranny?
And still I must ask… Where does anyone’s authority to pass any law come from?
I have finally found the shocking answer, for all law throughout history has always been based upon a Higher Authority. In other words, God has always been the gnostic Authority of man’s law, from Cannon law to its modern perversion of ecclesiastical oppression. The question is, which god or derivative thereof was manifested in establishing the United States as a central federation of government through constitution?
The laws of the United States are codified into what is known as “U.S.CODE“. This includes the codification of the constitution of the United States.
I consulted Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, printed in 1856, for a definition of this word “code”:
CODE, legislation. Signifies in general a collection of laws. It is a name given by way ofeminence to a collection of such laws made by the legislature.
This struck me as quite an odd use of language. Just what and where does this “eminence” hail from, and who exactly is granting it upon the holy U.S. Code of the United States government?
Of course, it then occurred to me that I had certainly heard government use this word before…
The 5th Amendment to the constitution – labeled as one of the “Bill of Rights” – clearly and unequivocally proclaims that your life, liberty, and property can be taken away by government with court order (due process). This is often referred to as the “Taking’s Clause“. It’s most common name though is eminent domain.
Eminent domain is a prime example of what a free country certainly is not! For if my life, my rights (liberties), and my property can simply be seized upon by a corrupt court’s opinion (the faith of the court) without my permission, in no way can any sane and rational man claim to live freely in the jurisdiction of the United States.
Bouvier’s goes on to define the words eminence and domain:
EMINENCE; A title of honor given to cardinals.
CARDINAL, ecclesiastical law. The title given to one of the highest dignitaries of the court(government)of Rome. Cardinals are next to the pope in dignity; he is elected by them and out of their body(body politic). There are cardinal bishops, cardinal priests, and cardinal deacons.
So like our president, the Pope is “elected” by cardinals (appointed representatives) who claim “eminence” (honor through title). So where does this eminence come from in the United States? And who bestowed this eminent authority upon the person who appointed these cardinals to the U.S. government? Do “the people” as a group know the will of God and somehow esoterically vote accordingly through a holy Vulcan mind meld? And if so, why do some people vote differently than other people?
DOMAIN. It signifies sometimes, dominion, territory governed – sometimes, possession,estate – and sometimes, land about the mansion house of a lord. By domain is also understood the right to dispose at our pleasure of what belongs to us. 2. A distinction, has been made between property and domain. The former (property) is said to be that quality which is conceived to be in the thing itself, considered as belonging to such or such person, exclusively of all others. By the latter (domain) is understood that right which the owner has of disposing of the thing. Hence domain and property are said to be correlative terms; the one is the active right (of the tenant) to dispose, the other (property is) a passive quality which follows the thing, and places it at the disposition of the owner.
DOMINION. The right of the owner of a thing to use it or dispose of it at his pleasure.
As tenants, citizens are not the owner of property registered with government. Property as a “passive quality” title is revokable through eminent domain by the true owner, which is government in Trust. So title of property is nothing but a positive (revokable) right (privilege) granted by government, which has dominion over your person and your property (artificial paper things and Titles).
But wait a minute! This legal definition of domain combined with the descriptive word “eminent” leads me to believe that the “Codes” passed by the legislature hold their authority directly from God Almighty… or some other god! And since when are titles of Nobility and Honor allowed in the United States against the constitution?
Oh, wait, I get it… the constitution itself is in fact a sacred set of articles granting the ultimate titles of sacred nobility!!!
Am I to understand that the representatives of the people – the congress and senate – are acting in the same capacity as Cardinals of the Catholic or other Church? Makes sense, considering that for many centuries the church has been the eminent government of most kingdoms.
When I asked a friend of his opinion on this concept, he referred me to Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, where I found another surprising legal definition that is actual case law:
EVIL. It is an “evil” withinrule that either means or end of conspiracy must be evil, to frustrate or impede a government function, whether that function is performed under a constitutional or an unconstitutional law. U.S. v. Rhoads, D.C. D.C., 48 F.Supp. 175, 176.
So according to the opinion of the courts, it is evil to impede the government while it is acting unconstitutionally?
Why am I being arrested, officer?
You’ve committed illegal evil, sir.
Oh, yes then… carry on…
In other words, it is evil to interfere with the holy eminence of government when it claims dominion over your life, your children’s life, your liberty, and your property. I seem to recall that it is evil to frustrate or impede the church as it pretends to act under God as well, but then it claims to be government too.
Now, I suppose we all have different ideas of what constitutes the word evil, but this is ridiculous! After the initial shock of this court opinion and legal definition faded a bit for me, a cold realization subsumed my soul as I realized something very important. This is nothing if not a religious opinion of a religious judicial court based upon its own delusional religious eminence and sacra-ment.
I harkened back to years of research and remembered other confounding claims of property ownership by government, which now started to make perfect sense from a religious standpoint.
Here we see the concept of domain explained on a universal scale: government owns all property, and the people are allowed to be tenants of that property as mere users once registered as citizens. And this from the congressional record!
“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of government, i.e. law, amounting to mere user; and user must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.”—Senate Document No. 43,73D Congress, 1st Session, entitled: “Contracts Payable in Gold”, by George Cyrus Thorpe, submitted to the senate: April 17, 1933
“The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.”–Congressman Patman, speaking from the Congressional Record of March 9, 1933, and referring to the Act of March 9, 1933.
If the United States has eminent domain over any and all property it claims, then the United States by default is technically the owner of all property in the United States (jurisdiction). In other words, it claims a dark eminence over the people and what they perceive as their personal property, but which is in fact the domain of the United States central government (a church and state). What else can one call this supposed authority of eminence over all things but righteous?
–=– The Founding Fathers
Of The American Temple –=–
The questions we will be answering today are: Where does this declared eminence hail from? Who or what were the founding fathers that claimed constitutional eminence over all “people”? How are the politicians of today related to those founding fathers? And from what Order of men did they then and now subscribe?
I considered for a long period the rather bold righteousness of these two congressional statements above… And that’s when it struck me – the Authority of government is not lawful in any way! It is not based on the consent of the people or upon the spirit of true justice. It is not even based on anything of or in this world. The horrifying truth is that the major governments of the world, including the United States, are claiming a uniform Authority from God… or from some other occult, godly, and etherical power unknown to most people.
But I didn’t fool myself anymore, for I knew then exactly which god it was.
I knew this almost immediately, because God’s law is the natural law. And everything the United States government does within its eminent “Code” is an attack upon that natural law and the natural rights of the people – the law of God and nature to do no harm to others or their property. U.S. Code is an absolute assault on the Ten Commandments and natural law, allowing government permission to kill, rape, pillage, and torture the enemies of its state within its eminent code. For nowadays, government hardly does anything else but harm its subjected people and eminently pronounce domain over all property and people in America, as well as the rest of the world through its military occupation and forced nation building – more commonly known as “spreading democracy”.
I understood then that my beliefs were absolutely irrelevant; my historical perspective dead wrong.
And I finally comprehended that day the truly dark nature of the Eminent Authority and Domain of this government and of that claimed by its founders. And so I went searching for the answers as to who or what their true higher Authority actually was…
–=– The Tools Of Masonry And Law –=–
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, lets us understand the deeper meaning of the words used in U.S. Codes and around the world, finding their origins in the ancient sacred geometry of Freemasonry:
RULE. This is a metaphorical expression borrowed from mechanics. The rule, in its proper and natural sense, is an instrument by means of which may be drawn from one point to another, the shortest possible line, which is called a straight line. 2. The rule is a means of comparison in the arts to judge whether the line be straight, as it serves in jurisprudence, to judge whether an action be just or unjust, it is just or right, when it agrees with the rule, which is the law. It is unjust and wrong, when it deviates from it. lt is the same with our will or our intention.
RULE OF LAW. Rules of law are general maxims, formed by the courts, who having observed what is common to many particular cases, announce this conformityby a maxim, which is called a rule; because in doubtful and unforeseen cases, it is a rule for their decision; it embraces particular cases within general principles…
–=–
In a million years I would never have guessed that the “Maxims” of law were based upon a metaphysical Masonic concept or tool of justice.
And so I looked to see how other words in this eminent legal system and language were based upon the tools of Masonry…
Of the most commonly used tools by a mason, one which does not get much attention, is the folding ruler. While the compass measures direction and the square measures angle, the rule is used to measure height and length. These modern day “rulers” used to be called a “story pole”, and in modern times have been replaced in practicality by the retracting steel measuring tape. Of course the necessity for a straight line, just as in ecclesiastical law, is paramount in masonry – the shortest distance between two points.
It is important to understand that the teachings of masonry are dualistic, using the tools of building and measurement as “metaphoric expressions” for the character of a man as a Freemason.
For example, the “Square” is one of the most important tools in Freemasonry. Besides being the first working tool in the Second Degree, it is also the Second Great Light.
The Plumb Rule is the emblem of integrity. The Plumb Rule consists of a weight hanging freely at the end of a line; the principle that actuates it is the influence of gravity. No matter where it is placed, it always points to the centre of the earth. So it is in the spiritual world, but here it points unerringly to God.
Note here that pointing downward to the center of the earth as opposed to pointing up to the heavens is represented as pointing to “God”. Perhaps I am mistaken, but rumor has it that something or someone else hangs out down there…
In the Third Degree, the Skirret is an implement which acts on a centre pin, whence a line is drawn to mark out the ground for the foundation of the intended structure. Symbolically,the Skirret points out that straight and undeviating line of conduct laid down for our pursuit in the Volume of the Sacred Law; and so to “square”, “level” and “upright” we must add “straight”. “Straight” is defined as the shortest distance between two points; and in our dealings with God, our neighbour and ourselves, we find that the shortest path is that which is straight. We can easily be tempted to take an easier path and so forsake the straight, perhaps at first just a little, but that “little” can become a habit. To keep on the straight requires restraint, which is rarely easy.
The Chisel is the last of the three working tools of the First Degree, and rightly so, because the Chisel should never leave our hand. As our ritual tells us: “the Chisel points out the advantages of education, by which means alone we are rendered fit members of every civilized society“. “Points out the advantages of education” — and is that not the whole theme of the Second Degree? There we are exhorted to extend our researches into the hidden mysteries of nature and science. “Science” in that use is the ancient word for knowledge, and education is the acquisition of knowledge, the way to which lies up the Winding Staircase. As the workman, with the aid of a chisel gives form and regularity to the shapeless mass of stone, so education by cultivating ideas and polishing rude thoughts transforms the ignorant savage into the civilised being.
The Chisel furthermore demonstrates the advantages of discipline. The mind like the diamond in its original state is unpolished, but by grinding away the external coat we are enabled to discover the latent beauty of the stone. Thus education discovers the latent beauties of the mind, and draws them forth to range over the field of matter and space in order to display the summit of human knowledge, our duty to God and man.
Why do judges use a gavel in their court proceedings?
The Gavel, we are told, represents the force of conscience, which, of course, is the voice of our own soul, or as our ritual puts it “the voice of nature” and the “centre from which we cannot err“. It is this inner voice that is ever ready to warn us when without it we would err. If we let conscience guide us, and are prompt to heed it, we will find its voice becoming stronger and clearer with every day of our lives; but, if we fail to heed it, failure becomes a habit, and its voice will eventually become so weak that it is barely audible, so that finally there is no warning at all and its owner becomes a really evil person.
Conscience, like the Gavel, will “knock off all superfluous knobs and excrescence’s” so that the rough stone ofour character will become the Perfect Ashlar fit for the Temple.
–=–
“The Latin assis was a board or plank; in the diminutive form, assula, it meant a small board, like a shingle, or a chip. In this connection it is interesting to note that our “axle” and’ “axis” were derived from it. In early English this became asheler and was used to denote a stone in the rough as it came from the quarries. The Operative Masons called such a stone a “rough ashlar,” and when it had been shaped and finished for its place in the wall they called it a “perfect ashlar.” An Apprentice is a rough ashlar, because unfinished, whereas a Master Mason is a perfect ashlar, because he has been shaped for his place in the organization of the Craft.“
– Source: 100 Words in Masonry
(Top) Crude Ashlar
(Bottom) Finished or Perfect Ashlar
–=–
The Builder was published from 1915 to 1930 by
the National Masonic Research Society.
Nearly a century later, it has yet to be surpassed in terms of quality of content.
–=–
Begin Excerpt from source: “The Builder”, December 1916
Our lodge is in every respect a symbolic workshop, furnished with all the tools belonging to the different grades of workmen, and with a trestleboard upon which are set forth the day’s designs and the material upon which the labor of the brethren is to be expended.
This symbolic material consists of the two ashlars, emblematic of the crude material and the finished product, which are placed plainly enough on view in New York lodges, but absent or almost unknown except to students in many other states. The oblong stones and nondescript slabs sometimes seen are noteworthy evidence that the age-old significance of the “cubical stone,” which has played such a prominent role in the mythology and mysticism of the past, has almost run to oblivion in the modern craft. These stones should really be perfect cubes. The symbolism of the working tools is completely lost the moment such proportions are lost sight of or ignored. The ancient Hebrews had their own version of the great “number philosophy,” which lent sanctity and expressiveness to the number 12. First of all, it was the number of their Twelve Tribes, who were doubtless a symbolical enrollment of all the heads of families under the zodiacal sign of the month in which they were born. It is certainly significant that the patriarchal system was founded upon this number, and later on many other dispositions were made that showed a particular reverence for the Chaldean plan of the universe based upon 12 signs. As one cube possesses six sides each of which is a perfect square, a number of remarkable mathematical and geometrical symbolisms were established based upon the fact that all the numbers, from one to 12 added together produce 78. This number is also the sum of3 times “26,” the numerical value of the “Great and Sacred Name of Jehovah” (JHVH).
As each cube possesses 12 edges, the combined number require a 24-inch rule to symbolize their total outline. The breaking into different mathematical combinations of this supreme number, each significant of some one of the great ruling phenomena of nature, was seen in the symbolism of the use of an operative Mason’s gavel in the dressing of building stones.
The grand old mystery name of our Creator, called the Tetragrammaton (Greek for “four-letter name”) had as its root the three letters J, H, and V, which as numbers were 10, 5, and 6, or 21, the sum of the added numbers 1 to 6 represented by a single cube.
This fact was made the basis of a curious legend, ought by the wise old rabbis into that marvelous compilation called the Talmud, from which more than a little of our Masonic material has been derived.
The story is of the Patriarch Enoch (Hanok, father Methuseleh), whose name means “the initiator,” 10, all accounts agree, lived 365 years, or a “year of years.” A remarkable book attributed to him is often alluded to by the Hebrew commentators and early Christian “Fathers”; but no trace of it was ever found until in the last century it turned up in Abyssinia. It has been translated out of that strange African dialect into many tongues. The so-called Book of Enoch contains a remarkable recital of astronomical science as known to the ancients, told entirely in allegorical form, while the history of the Children of Israel is prophesied ( ?) under the allegorical simile of the remarkable doings of a singularly intelligent flock of sheep which build a house for their shepherd, the whole reading very much like a children’s fairy tale.
The Talmudic legend of Enoch represents him as greatly disturbed at the news of the impending world Deluge,” for fear the Name of God should be lost. He accordingly caused it to be inscribed upon a triangular plate of gold, and affixed it to a cubical stone, for the safe keeping of which he caused a series of nine arched vaults to be constructed, one beneath another, at the foot of Mt. Moriah (the holy mountain of the Jews, as Mt. Meru was of the Hindus). The rains came and the flood descended, and so washed the mud and silt over the site that it became completely obliterated.
Centuries later, when King David was moved “to build an house unto the Lord,” and actually set his workmen to dig the foundations thereof, the latter discovered the vaults, and descending therein brought to light the long-buried stone.
Tradition also has it that the material of this stone was agate, which would at once connect it with the Hermetic philosophy; for agate, above all, was sacred to Hermes and Thoth or David. The latter, having been a warlike monarch, was not permitted to achieve that which he had begun and so bequeathed the cubical stone to his son Solomon, who made use of it as the cornerstone of the Temple.
The imagery of this is plain enough in the fact that, not in a written or engraved inscription, but in the mathematical proportions of the cube itself, was to be found that wonderful Name which is, as it were,the foundation of the universe, of which man is a fleshly epitome and the Temple on Mt. Moriah a symbolic one.
By knowing the use of the working tools of an E. A. the initiate might begin his labor of hewing and shaping the brute matter at his feet into stones fit for the builders’ use; but when he had accomplished his task he was apprised that the symmetry and order it represented in its finished shape was “God”: not a god whom he created, but a God whom his patient labor had revealed.
The cube itself was an age-old symbol of the spiritual Man, as set forth in the Mahabarata of ancient India:
A portion of Mine own Self, transformed in the world of life into an immortal Spirit, draweth round itself the senses of which the Mind, is the Sixth, veiled in Matter.
Therefore we find the cube present in all the ancient mythologies, which were butracial cloaks for one and the same wisdom religion, understood by the priests of all countries alike as a symbol of the sixth sign of the zodiac, the characters portrayingthe great Mother of Wisdom and her divine son Man.
It is the task of the apprentice to break through the shell of matter and liberate the Divine Word that dwells within by opening his own spiritual perceptions to the light of the Logos. As the priceless statues of Phidias and Praxiteles were once shapeless masses of unmeaning stone and the Parthenon a sea-worn crag, until gavel and gage, mallet and chisel, in the hand of inspiration had performed their tasks, so has always been the lesson of the cube in its unshapen and shapen forms to the apprentice Mason.
End Excerpt.
–=–
Something very important has been revealed here, which we will touch upon in more detail as we progress. We must comprehend that the ancient mystery religions, including all of the modern Christian, Judaism, and Islamic faiths, were derived from this Masonic “code” and that these mythologies as allegorical stories all originate from the same source. In other words, religion itself does not shape God, but instead shapes what men do with its teachings. They each control men depending upon that mans race, culture, and preconceived beliefs. And each religion is and was created based upon the integration of race and culture into “the same wisdom religion”.
This is extremely important, as we will see, in understanding the reasons for the next World War (3) and its purpose of pitting the people (races) of all nations against each other. For the true goal in the mysteries is to establish (phoenix rising) a one world religion out of the ashes of a religious war between these “racial cloaks” called religions. The Temple is being rebuilt upon the Mount, with the purpose of inciting world Islam against the now unholy alliance of Christians and the false Jews who claim the Kingdom of Jerusalem (Israel), which we call international Zionism.
As we look around the world and view the tainted media and its “news”, as well as the so-called “Christian” evangelism promoting Israel at all costs, we see the Islamic world spreading while the now Zionist governments of once racially exclusive nations like Sweden, Germany, France, and England become overrun with Muslim immigrants.
In these videos, we can see the plan shaping up and unfolding as the battlefield is being set for a holy religious war on an international scale, all centered around Jerusalem (Israel) and its holy Temple on the Mount recently reclaimed by the Masonic powers of the world after World War II.
“All the qualities of Catholicism…”
“No figures, no images… that’s the only line (difference).”
–=–
How else do you create a holy racial religious war than to purposefully intermingle such racial religious foes until one race and religion is forced to fight for its very culture, life, and land? And what happens when you discover that this has been the plan for a very long time – to allow the common-blood “goyim” races to simply and ignorantly wipe each other off the map in a trumped up holy war?
As required reading for full comprehension here, please view my History of World Governments and their incremental takeover by international Zionism, leading to the World Jewish Congress and the reclaiming of the Kingdom Of Israel for the Plantagenet bloodline kings – a war waged by Great Britain’s alliance with that Zionist congress.
It is of the utmost importance to comprehend that the white Ashkenazim “Jews” who now inhabit Palestine (Israel) in an illegal political “State” are not Semitic in any way – they are not the Biblical Jews. And yet they hide behind the historical notion of being the “lost tribes” of the “chosen people”, and now control the major governments of the world. But in truth, the leaders of nations and religions are all of the same blood, pretending to oppose one another while secretly and collectively striving for the same goal of rebuilding the Temple of Solomon and establishing a one world religion through the religious and racial war that action will create.
–=–
The Constitution Of A Debt –=–
It is incredibly troubling to ponder the false paradigm of religious-like zeal that Americans exude towards the constitution of the United States. Like moths to a flame, this document of debt enslavement (charter) that created this corporation known as the United States attracts the hearts of people of every age, while their minds waste away viewing a high-definition revision of world history in books and on magic movie and television screens.
Ironically, it is this very document that forged (chartered) the slave colony called the USA; a Virginia Company, and part of the East India Company.
So again, we must remember exactly what a “constitution” actually is.
We must remember that freedom means to obey the laws of government, no mater how tyrannical.
And we must remember that the constitution creates political freedom, not the state of being free men in nature.
Bouvier’s again explains…
TO CONSTITUTE, contracts. To empower,to authorize. In the common form of letters of attorney, these words occur, I nominate, constitute and appoint.”
CONSTITUTION, contracts. The constitution ofa contract, is the making of the contract as, the written constitution of a debt.
CONSTITUTOR, civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation.
EVIL. It is an “evil” withinrule… to frustrate or impede a government function, whether that function is performed under aconstitutional or an unconstitutional law. U.S. v. Rhoads, D.C. D.C., 48 F.Supp. 175, 176. (From Black’s Law, above)
CONSTITUTION, government. The fundamental law of the state, containing the principles upon which the government is founded, and regulating the divisions of the sovereign powers, directing to what persons each of these powers is to be confided, and the, manner it is to be exercised as, the Constitution of the United States… The words constitution and government are sometimes employed to express the same idea, the manner in which sovereignty is exercised in each state. Constitution is also the name of the instrument containing the fundamental laws of the state. 3. By constitution, the civilians, and, from them, the common law writers, mean some particular law; as the constitutions of the emperors contained in the Code.
CODE, legislation. Signifies in general a collection of laws. It is a name given by way of eminence to a collection of such laws made by the legislature.
–=–
Now, we already know that the constitution continued the debt of the Congress into the new United States government. But what was that debt continued from?
Let’s read Article 12 of the Articles of Confederation:
Article XII. All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of congress, before the assembling of the united States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered as a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said united States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged.
Remember what faith is, and that you are pledged as surety for the full faith and credit of the nation.
And what is it to be pledged?
PLEGIIS ACQUIETANDIS, WRIT DE. The name of an ancient writ in the English law, which lies where a man becomes pledge or surety for another to pay a certain sum of money at a certain day; after the day, if the debtor does not pay the debt, and the surety be compelled to pay, he shall have this writ to compel the debtor to pay the same.
A man is a surety to his government assigned artificial person, and thus is a debtor to government. That debt can be forced from the surety via “due process” of government courts via similar code today. And again we see debtor prisons rising from the ashes…
PLEDGE, contracts. He who becomes security for another, and, in this sense, every one who becomes bail for another is a pledge.
PLEDGER. The same as pawner. (q. v.)
PLEDGEE. The same as pawnee. (q. v.)
PLEDGE or PAWN, contracts. These words seem indifferently used to convey the same idea… 3. Sir William Jones defines a pledge to be a bailment of goods by a debtor to his creditor, to be kept till the debt is discharged… a contract by which a debtor gives to his creditor a thing to detain as security for his debt. Lord Holt’s definition is, when goods or chattels are delivered to another as a pawn, to be security for money borrowed of him by the bailor – and this, he adds, is called in Latin vadium, and in English, a pawn or pledge. 4… according to Judge Story, it may be defined to be a bailment of personal property, as security for some debt or engagement… 5. The term pledge or pawn is confined to personal property; and where real or personal property is transferred by a conveyance of the title, as a security, it is commonly denominated a mortgage. 6. A mortgage of goods is, in the common law, distinguishable from a mere pawn. By a grant or a conveyance of goods in gage or mortgage, the whole legal title passes conditionally to the mortgagee; and if not redeemed at the time stipulated, the title becomes absolute at law, though equity will interfere to compel a redemption. But in a pledge a special property only passes to the pledges, the general property remaining in the pledger. A mortgage may be without possession, but a pledge cannot be without possession… 7. Things which are the subject of pledge or pawn are ordinarily goods and chattels; but money, negotiable instruments, actions, and indeed any other valuable thing of a personal nature, such as patent-rights and manuscripts, may, by the common law, be delivered in pledge. 8. It is of the essence of the contract, that there should be an actual delivery of the thing. 9. It is essential that the thing should be delivered as a security for some debt or engagement. –Bouvier’s, 1856
Black’s 4rth importantly adds:
Pledge… The necessary elements to constitute a contract one of “pledge” are: Possession of the pledged property must pass from the pledgor to the pledgee; the legal title to the property must remain in the pledgor; and the pledgee must have a lien on the property for the payment of a debt or the performance of an obligation due him by the pledgor or some other person-while, in a “chattel mortgage,” the legal title passes to the mortgagee subject to a defeasance… A bailment of personal property as security for a debt or other obligation. The specific article delivered to the creditor in security is also called a “pledge” or “pawn.”
So specifically, the Articles of Confederation were delivered to Great Britain and France as a pledge or pawn of America and its colonies, its current and future titled land as territories, its property, and its people as surety for debt.
The subsequent formation of the new United States was for all intents and purposes a “bailout” of the bankrupt congress of the Confederacy, conveying the debt of those Masons over to the new constituted corporation called United States.
–=– The Masonic Hand
That Governs And Enforces –=–
In retrospect, it is unfair of me to merely criticize an entire population who, like myself, grew up in government indoctrination centers called public schools. Like most parents, mine believed it was their duty to send me to a government school, and that it was my duty to pledge my allegiance to that government. I was fooled equally as well as everyone else; becoming part of the amorphous mass of brainwashed human commodities trained to be work-ready by age 18 with my hand on my heart, worshiping the corporate flag of that holy corporate district called United States.
But then in my late 20’s, as buildings were falling in New York City and military men were blocking the streets; as the world was morphing before my very eyes despite anything the constitution may or may not say – I actually read the constitution seemingly for the first time…
Over and over I poured through its legal language, defining its words, shocked at its blatant amendments, and confounded by its true history. And with the comprehension of every new Article and Amendment my belief turned to horror; the realization that I was part of something more sinister than I could ever have imagined. I realized that this corporation was literally killing in my name; with my permission – in the name of “the people”. For every crime that the United States commits is done so with its presumed consent of the people it represents… one nation that is certainly not under God.
And today, having just turned 41 this month, I have the dubious duty to report my findings on this holiest of fallacies called the United States constitution.
World peace through law???
Law = military police force, for law holds no power without force.
Force = Peace
Force = Liberty
Force= Freedom
Force = Law
–=–
So let’s talk about just who or what this trademarked
and supposed “global force for good” actually is.
Notice the Trademark symbol for this military corporation?
How does the Government define a trademark? “A trademark is a brand name.“
Care and Compasion Hand Delivered?
Which picture is real, and which is print media propaganda?
Corporate recruiting…
A military needs public affairs for its commercial activities and advertising.
And somehow it has salvaged its completely corrupt and tainted reputation
among the American people who unwittingly support it through debt and tacit consent.
But is there more to the military and its “Authority” than we’ve imagined?
Allegiance to…
Clark Gable and Douglas Fairbanks – Masonic Brothers, Lodge #528, Beverly Hills
Gene Autry – 33rd Degree Mason, life Member Lodge # 185, Long Beach
Charles A. Lindbergh, Master Mason
Joe M. Jackson, Masonic Lodge #68
And what about the Commander in Chief?
Commander In Chief of the U.S. Military Barack Obama with his Masonic ring…
The Masonic handshake.
–=–
When considering the masses of enlisted soldiers in the military, we must apply the same logic and reason as we do to common members of churches and citizens under governments. Obviously, a kid straight out of high school will not be privy to the sacred secrets and mysteries held by the Masonic Generals of that Army. So it would be foolish again to compare the useful idiots (useful innocents) in the military, that would obey orders to attack their own people on command, to that of the leadership and government of the military. And of course the same holy and sacred oath apparently gives authority to those leaders and allows unquestioning soldiers to die and kill in the name of some deistic god and nation.
The profits from war, occupation, and conquest are a multitude and come in many forms. No one can dare declare this to be a false statement with a straight face. It controls the common-blood population and brings booty into the government’s sacred coffers. But we never seem to consider that the for-profit model of war is literally a corporate business of the Untied States, under the command of the Commander in Chief of that corporation.
Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, defines the Army as:
ARMY. The armed forces of a nation intended for military service on land. An “army” is a body of men whose business is war. While the “militia” is a body of men composed of citizens occupied temporarily in the pursuit of civil life, but organized by discipline and drill, and called into the field for temporary military service when the exigencies of the country require it.
REGULAR ARMY. The permanent military establishment, which is maintained both inpeace and war according to law.
There are two very important distinctions here; one between the nation and the countries within, and the other between the militia and a regular army (business). In fact, one of the chief complaints against the King within the Declaration of Independence was that:
“He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armieswithout the Consent of our legislatures.”
And yet in stark contradiction, the constitution in Article 1, Section 8 gives the United States Legislature (Congress) the Power:
“To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years…”
“To provide and maintain a Navy…”
“To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Force…”
Of course, this deceptive language is similar to the language used for national emergencies. Like those, the “Appropriation of Money” is legislated every two years in congress in its appropriations bills – the funding of military rule and foreign and domestic occupation with public moneys out of the public debt or “God Trust”. So while the constitution states a seeming restriction, it also states how to simply work around that restriction in congress.
A standing army is just fine as long as congress consents to and supports it?
The “Federal Farmer” wrote a series of letters published in the PoughkeepsieCounty Journal in late 1787 and early 1788, where he predicted that under the new Constitution:
“(Congress) will have unlimited power to raise armies, and to engage officers and men for any number of years.”
“I see so many men in America fond of a standing army, and especially among those who probably will have a large share in administering the federal system; it is very evident to me, that we shall have a large standing army as soon as the monies to support them can be possibly found. An army is not a very agreeable place of employment for the young gentlemen of many families.”
“…we all agree, that a large standing army has a strong tendency to depress and inslave (enslave) the people.”
–=–
So why is it that in the American states we had individual state militias, whereas in the nation we have a standing army as a business? Just what is the difference between these two words that we so commonly intermingle without care or concern?
COUNTRY. By country is meant the state of which one is a member. 2. Every man’s country is in general the state in which he happens to have been born, though there are some exceptions. See Domicil; Inhabitant. But a man has the natural right to expatriate himself, i. e. to abandon his country, or his right of citizenship acquired by means of naturalization in any country in which he may have taken up his residence.
Ah, so a man in a country is still considered under the natural law; not being forced to submit to that government.
So what the is a nation, and why is it so important to get men to enter into the jurisdiction of the nation despite being perfectly comfortable in his or her country (state)?
NATIONS. Nations or states are independent bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength. 2. But every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation; a body of pirates, for example, who govern themselves, are not a nation. To constitute a nation another ingredient is required. The body thus formed must respect other nations in general, and each of their members in particular. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights. 3. It belongs to the government to declare whether they will consider a colony which has thrown off the yoke of the mother country as an independent state; and until the government have decided on the question, courts of justice are bound to consider the ancient state of things as remaining unchanged.
NATIONALITY.The state(disposition)of a person in relation to the nation in which he was born. 2. A man retains his nationality of origin during his minority, but, as in the case of his domicil of origin, he may change his nationality upon attaining full age; he cannot, however, renounce his allegiance without permission of the government. See Citizen; Domicil; Expatriation; Naturalization…
NATIVES. All persons born within the jurisdiction of the United States, are considered as natives.
Are you a native of the United States? Do you think this legal status was a choice? It means that you were born in a state (country) and are a citizen (artificial person) of the United States (the nation).
Confused?
These words are not interchangeable. In America, there are 50 countries that are members of the nation called the United States.
The United States is not a country, it is a nation.
California is not a nation, it is a country (state).
The 50 “states” of America are all individual countries bound to the nation of the United States under military force of its “spiritual jurisdiction”.
The name United States is very confusing, for it is not representative of the true nature of the countries within. The United States is nothing but the name of the corporation of a district. I could call myself “Dog” as my official name, but that doesn’t make me an actual dog. I am man. Just because the nation calls itself “United States”, that does not mean that it is a country. For the nation is a series of countries that under contract make up the body politic of that nation. The name of the government of that conglomeration of states is the “United States”.
In its simplest terms, a nation is nothing but a “jurisdiction”. It’s sort of like a masonic club, where you can check in but you can’t check out. The civil war is evidence of this fact, supported by the Lieber Code and the United States military occupation of each country (state) of its nation today. Just as a nation’s members are countries (or “states” as artificial corporations), so too are the persons who are citizens of the nation – members of the club. To claim to be a natural-born citizen of the United States means that you were born in a country (state) and are a contracted artificial person corporation of the United States jurisdiction. You are like a Starbuck’s, and there’s one of you on every corner. You see, a natural born man cannot him or herself be an artificial person. For this, the United States corporation (district) created the “14th amendment citizen” and requires you (the man) to be surety for that artificial person in order to be legally called a “citizen” – to be considered a thing instead of a living man – to be a chattel commodity instead of a sentient being.
A citizen is nothing but a piece of paper, assigned a number, and filed away in a cabinet.
But most relevant to this topic is the difference between the militias of the individual countries (states) as compared to the standing army of the nation. For the last thing that the occupying military force of the United States (nation) would desire is for the individual countries (states) to have their own military power to stand in protection of the county (state) against the Masonic United States (nation/jurisdiction). The purpose of minimizing and diminishing the State militias was to create a central army that would occupy and “keep the peace” in each country (state) in order to ensure the military rule of the nation over the countries (states).
In essence, the ability of each state to protect itself from the jurisdiction (rule) of the sovereign (ruler) has been conquered and eradicated by simply destroying the organization of the people of each country (state) as their own military force. The last thing a bully wants is for his victims to fight back.
And this is the forced contractual nature of the word “united” – a nation of tyranny over countries (states).
E Pluribus Unum – out of many (countries), one (nation)…
…Under God???
–=–
The Masonic Charter Of Freedom:
Constituting The United States –=–
“Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA has many, many Masonic Connections. It stands on land purchased by Wm. Allen, Grand Master of PA. The ground was staked by Edmond Wolley, a Mason. Thomas Boude, the brick mason, was the first Secretary of St. John’s Lodge of Philadelphia and later Deputy Grand Master. Benjamin Franklin laid the cornerstone while Grand Master (1734) with the assistance of St John’s Lodge. Brother Andrew McNair of Philadelphia rang the bell to call the populace on July 8, 1776, to hear the reading of the Declaration of Independence. The Liberty Bell cracked in 1835 when it tolled the death of Chief Justice John Marshall, past Grand Master of Virginia.”
–Missouri Lodge of Research, “Did You Know?”, Wes Cook publisher, 1965
–=–
The comprehension that our most cherished of declarations and the corporate charter called the constitution are a fraud is very much like losing one’s faith in the religious doctrine that controls the minds of good Christians, turning them away from God and natural law. The cult of patriotism that has sprung forth from this particular religion of national constitutionalism is one that I believe must come to an end… yet another pledge of allegiance without comprehension of its consequences. For the constitution is the basis for all fairy tales and faith in and of what would otherwise be a free land and country, and it represents the very foundation of power and tyranny by the corporation for which it chartered. It grants no rights to men, for it only applies to government and artificial corporate persons. It gives no true recourse for the grievances of men, for the courts are government owned. It perverts the natural state of man and binds us in contractual chains of artificial person-hood and obligation. And it offers nothing but debt and subjection to its believers who voluntarily and falsely embrace it as God-given.
The constitution is nothing more than the foundation and Masonic cornerstone of a cult, and its leaders are steering its followers into destitution and despotism…. and world war.
This is done by continuously using the promise of freedom – a word very few common men understand. For in true Orwellian double-speak, the Freedom that is prescribed “eminently” by the constitution is not what we believe it to be. As I will show further into this essay, freedom actually means tyranny. And ironically, the more tyranny that citizens have forced upon them, the more freedom they enjoy. If you are intrigued and skeptical by this statement, it will all make sense later…
For those brave enough to challenge their own belief system by reading and considering what is written below, I would absolutely invite you to ardently attempt to challenge the following information without patriotic dogma (religious belief). I would invite you to suspend your belief and realize your self; stepping outside of the group-think model you’ve been trained to accept and into the world of individual thought, reason, and unbiased logic. And for God’s sake, literally… search your soul. For if this constitution is truly what you believe it to be, surely you can disprove what I am about to reveal. I wholeheartedly encourage you to attempt to do so.
But first you must read…
Before we can examine the rhetoric of this constitution, we must first understand who the Authors of this “Charter For Freedom” were and why they chose to grammatically pen the constitution as they did. This documented history will be followed (in Part 3) by a step by step examination of each myth and fallacy surrounding the constitution and its verbiage. Now, we will expound upon the actual language and define the words written within this debt compact.
Let’s begin…
–=–
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense,
promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty
to ourselves and our Posterity, doordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America.”
–U.S. Constitution
–=–
ORDAIN.
(Black’s 4rth)
To institute or establish; to make an
ordinance; to enact a constitution or law. To confer on a personthe holy orders of priest or deacon.
ORDINATION.
(Black’s 4rth) Ceremony by which a bishop confers on a person
the privileges and powers necessary for the execution of sacerdotal (priestly) functions in the church.
ORDINATION.
(Bouvier’s 1856)
Civil and ecclesiastical law.
The act of conferring the orders of the church upon an individual*.
***Individual means a single artificial person
ORDINUM FUGITIVI.
(Black’s 4rth)
In old English law. Those of the religious who deserted their houses,
and, throwing off the habits, renounced their particular
order in contempt of their oath and other obligations.
–=–
Ever wondered why certain words are capitalized in the constitution? People, Order, Union, Welfare…?
It would seem that this was just some random quirk by the author in his penmanship, until we take a closer look at those capitalized words.
Let’s take for example this phrase “in Order”, whichtakes upon itself a very different meaning than the phrase “in order” – where the word order is not capitalized as it is in the Constitution.
Since the constitution was written as: “We the People, in Order to form a more perfect Union… do ordain and establish this Constitution…”, we have grammatically and in meaning a very different legal document than what might otherwise be – one issued and ordained by a specific “Order” of men as a small society of specific “People” with a certain self-granted ecclesiastical status of eminence and domain, who thus signed this Constitution in an Order as the only People. But who or what exactly gave them the eminent power and authority to do this?
***Note: We will be using the “Masonic” edition of the Holy Bible throughout this discourse to help in our comprehensions.
It is stated, according to the Masonic “Holy Bible Red Letter Edition – Masonic Edition Cyclopedic IndexedKing James Bible”, published by the John A. Hertzel Co. Chicago (1942), that:
“George Washington the founder of this country was the first Grand Master of Masons’ of this commonwealth compromising the thirteen original States of this Land of Liberty founded on the principles of Brotherly Love, Faith, Hope and Charity, the vital breath of which is “Individual Liberty” and an equal opportunity to all of its citizens. Of the twenty-nine Major Generals in Washington’s army twenty four were Master Masons, of the thirty seven Brigadiers, thirty seven were Master Masons, proving that this “Land of Liberty” was founded by Master Masons. Now as then, masonry’s challenge is the Holy Bible, its teachings from the center to circumference symbols of the everlasting. “The Washington Monument is built of stone contributed by all the nations of the earth to honor the founder of this republic. From Arlington it looks like a giant spike which God had driven, saying ‘Here I stake a claim for the home of Liberty’.” L. J.
Did you notice some of the same grammatical capitalization processes here as were written into the constitution in that City of Brotherly Love?
On the same opening page, it states:
“Of fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independence, fifty-three were Master Masons.”
So just who was this man, George Washington?
This statue of Washington donning a Masonic Apron
stands in the New york Grand Masonic Hall
Washington’s Masonic Apron is displayed here in a Masonic Lodge,
and is considered “The most prized possession of American Masons”
The Crude Ashlar and the Finished or Perfect Ashlar stones
George Washington laying the Masonic Cornerstone of United States Capital building.
It was Freemason Benjamin Franklin who laid the cornerstone for Independence Hall.
–=– “Of fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independence, fifty-three were Master Masons.”
–=–
From this sourced statement and pictures there should be little doubt in anyone’s mind that the masterminds behind the United States were indeed of the Masonic Order. And as we view the writing style of this Masonic Holy Bible, we can see the same unique capitalization standards as are applied in the language of the constitution.
The question is… What exactly does this capitalized word “Order” mean as it applies to the constitution, and who were the “People” in this “Order”?
The greatest problem in translation is that most people consider these words that were capitalized as merely conversational words. They are not. They are specific legal terms and proper nouns. They are specific concepts and things. And they must be defined as such when comprehending the meaning of this constitution and these purposefully capitalized nouns. In any contract, the subject of that contract is written with capitalization. When this Masonic tool of language is applied, the constitution suddenly takes on a whole new meaning.
Let’s first have a look at just what the definitions of some of these words are as both conversational words compared to their usage as legal and proper nouns.
Here is the Webster’s Dictionary definition for the word order, which specifically makes the distinction between the verb and the proper Noun:
–=–
1or·der
verb \ˈȯr-dər\
Definition of ORDER
transitive verb
1: to put in order : arrange
2a: to give an order to : command
2b : destine, ordain <so ordered by the gods>
2c: to command to go or come to a specified place <ordered back to the base>
2d: to give an order for <order a meal>
intransitive verb
1 :to bring about order : regulate
2a: to issue orders : command
2b: to give or place an order
2order
noun (and proper noun)
Definition of ORDER
1a:a group of people united in a formal way: as (1):a fraternal society <the Masonic Order>(2):a community under a religious rule; especially : one requiring members to take solemn vows
1b: a badge or medal of such a society; also:a military decoration
2a: any of the several grades of the Christian ministry
2bplural: the office of a person in the Christian ministry
2cplural : ordination
3a:a rank, class, or special group in a community or society
3b:a class of persons or things grouped according to quality, value, or natural characteristics: as (1): a category of taxonomic classification ranking above the family and below the class (2): the broadest category in soil classification
4a (1) : rank, level <a statesman of the first order> (2) : category, class <in emergencies of this order — R. B. Westerfield>
6a:a prescribed form of a religious service:rite
10a:a written direction to pay money to someone
–=–
All of these words have previously been defined in this essay. The sacramentum or solemn vow, the religious custom of rite, a constitution as a written direction to pay money or be obligated to someone or something…
But first and foremost we must notice the difference in capitalization here for these definitions. For while the verb and noun are not capitalized, the specific noun form of the word Order is proper and therefore necessarily is capitalized. This was no semantic whim on the part of these Masonic architects of the constitution. These words were specifically given as proper Persons, Places, or Things (proper nouns) as opposed to the use of the general or conversational meaning of these words. Even within Webster’s Dictionary, the example used to describe the proper capitalized form of the noun Order is specifically the “Masonic Order” as we see above, which is purposefully capitalized to refer to a specific entity; a group of specific People in a specific Order.
Most importantly, this word specifically signifies a society of men with self-proclaimed eminence and authority as a religious (ecclesiastical) rite as opposed to all common people in general. And when we read this sentence again, it is quite difficult to translate it in any other way.
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
Here is what it would say without the pomp and circumstance of false patriotism to fool the average reader (all the other people):
“We the People of the United States, in Order… do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
But let’s not be hasty… Are there any other societies of law and order that we may see Masonic proper noun terms used like Liberty, Justice, Union, Tranquility, Blessings, and Welfare, etc?
When a court comes to Order, it is coming to order in the Order of the society of the American Bar Association under the United States’ jurisdiction of the Department of Justice. When a public council meeting comes to order, it is coming to Order with the specific People on that Council under eminent domain of its citizens. And who calls the Court to Order? The Marshal or Sheriff (Bailiff).
But is there something we don’t know about the State Marshal and County Sheriffs?
Crescent and star?
Star of David? The Seals of Solomon…?
Hey… what’s that ‘G’ in a square and compass doing on that patch?
Hey, why is the international symbol of fascism on that patch?
Fascio (plural fasci)- A bundle of wood wrapped with an axe…
The ancient international symbol of fascism!
Left: National Guard emblem with crossed fasci – Right: seal of U.S. Courts with fascio
Lincoln Memorial with Fasci on throne
Lincoln Memorial
George Washington statues with veiled Fasci
Federal Hall, New York City
Left: Seal of the United States Senate with crossed Fasci
Right: U.S. “Mercury” Dime with fascio
The International symbol of Fascism hangs prevalently in the Halls of Congress
And what is that over on the left…?
A Scepter?
A Mace?
The God Trust
Speaker of the House James Beauchamp “Champ” Clark standing at the rostrum
in the House of Representatives chamber by Fascio, United States Capitol,
Washington, D.C. (between 1910 and 1915)
–=–
But why are these Roman Fasci hanging in the halls of congress and adorning so many monuments?
Well, we can always get the propaganda tour from the governments Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives:
Did you notice the art was framed in wooden fasci?
Yes… surrounding Washington are the fasci and the Greek gods, what of it slave?
–=–
And, from the official U.S. Govt. website of the “Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives”, we get this official explanation:
The Bronze Fasces
“The bronze fasces, representing a classical Roman symbol of civic authority, are located on both sides of the U.S. flag. The original Roman fasces consisted of an axe within a bundle of rods, bound together by a red strap. The fasces were carried before the consul and were used to restore order and carry out punishment of the courts. The U.S. adopted the fasces as a symbol of the authority of Congress in part due to their symbolic relationship with Republican Rome, which the founding fathers consciously referenced in the formation of the United States.”
–=–
The Mace
“The mace, a decorative variation of the fasces, is placed by the Sergeant at Arms on a pedestal at the Speaker’s right each time the House convenes. The mace is moved to the lower pedestal of the Speaker’s rostrum when the House is called into the Committee of the Whole on the state of the Union or for the consideration of legislation.
This mace has been in use in the House since 1841 when the Members met in the old House Chamber, and was crafted by William Adams, a New York silversmith. The original House mace was destroyed when the British burned the Capitol in 1814. During the intervening years, a wooden mace was used.
To restore order in the Chamber the Speaker may direct the Sergeant at Arms to take the mace from its pedestal and present it before an unruly Member.
The mace is 46 inches high, made of 13 thin ebony rods. The rods are bound together by the four crossing silver bands, which are pinned together and held at the top and bottom of the shaft by silver bands. The bands are decorated with a raised floral border. The inscription “Wm. Adams/Manufacturer/New York/1841” is engraved in a cartouche in the center front of the bottom band.
A silver globe with an eagle perched on it sits at the top of the mace. The globe is 4½ inches in diameter and engraved with the seven continents, the names of the oceans, lines of longitude, and major lines of latitude. The Western Hemisphere faces the front. The globe is encircled with a silver band marked with the degrees of latitude, on which the engraved, solid silver eagle with a 15-inch wingspan rests.”
–=–
Mace of the U.S. Congress with 13 Ebony Rods
Fascio and Mace Combined in U.S. Congress Chambers
Roman Centurion and Fascio engraved upon the U.S. Supreme Court.
The scourging rods of these Fasci were said to be used on Jesus
in torture and punishment before His crucifixion!
–=–
Now then, where could the symbolic use of the sacred Fasci Mace have come from?
Crest of ZBT = Zeta Beta Tau Including:
– Brotherly (Masonic) Handshake
– (Aladdin’s) Lamp
– Scales of “Justice”
– The Fasci
-Skull and Bones…
– Solomon’s Seal (Star of David)
“Zeta Beta Tau (ZBT) was founded in 1898 as the nation’s first Jewish fraternity.
No longer sectarian, all men of good character who believe in ZBT’s mission
and values are eligible for membership in Zeta Beta Tau. Today the merged
Zeta Beta Tau Brotherhood is one of the largest, numbering over
140,000 initiated Brothers, and over 90 chapter locations.
The Zeta Beta Tau fraternity was inspired by Dr. Richard J. H. Gottheil,
a professor of languages at Columbia University and a Zionist.
On December 29, 1898, he formed a Zionist youth society with
a group of students from several New York City universities.
Rush week… Join ZBT now!
For the Masonic Knights Templar, the skull and bones symbolize Golgotha –
the place of Jesus’ crucifixion. It is also used to symbolize a dire warning
against betraying the group’s secrets and/or failing to keep one’s oath.
Original Edomite “Mace” Circa 650 B.C.
Notice the Horns of the “Devil”.
So where else can we find this fascist Roman symbol of authority and the “right” (rite) to punish “sin” and “evil” in the United States’ spiritual jurisdiction?
Look a bit closer…
The dome upon the United States Capital building in
Washington D.C. is adorned with multiple symbols of fascism
Jefferson County Courthouse (1929), downtown Birmingham, Alabama.
Chicago City Hall with Fascio over doorway
Boston Federal Building
–=–
The first General Assembly of the State of Colorado approved the adoption of the state seal on March 15, 1877. The Colorado Secretary of State alone is authorized to affix the Great Seal of Colorado to any document whatsoever. By statute, the seal of the State is two and one-half inches in diameter with the following devices inscribed thereon: At the top is the Eye of Providence or ‘All Seeing Eye’ within a triangle, from which golden rays radiate on two sides. Below the eye is a scroll, the Roman fasces, a bundle of birch or elm rods with a battle ax bound together by red thongs and bearing on a band of red, white and blue, the word, “Union and Constitution.”… Below the shield in a semicircle is the motto, “Nil Sine Numine”, Latin words meaning “nothing without the Deity”, and at the bottom the figures 1876, the year Colorado came into statehood.
–=–
Cleveland Public Library
U.S. Army and Air Force National Guard emblem with crossed Fasci
42nd MP Brigade (Military Police) patch
US Army Military Police Corps Regimental Insignia
United States Army Institute of Heraldry
Approved July 3rd, 1986
Emblem of the Masonic Knights Of Columbus
New York Deputy Inspector badge with crossed Fasci on Shield
CCTV fittingly perched over a fascio
An early Roman coin with Caesar’s head and symbols
representing things the coin could be spent upon…
1. ears of corn (food and lodging)
2. Fasce (payments of Roman tax levies) and
3. Caduceus – (payment for medical treatments)
In Roman occupied countries such as Judea in 33 A.D.,
Roman capital punishment execution squads were always
preceded by two official “Lictors” bearing the two “Fasces”.
Alexander Garden fence, Moscow Kremlin
National emblem of France
France Civic Heraldry Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (Brotherhood)
A modern French Passport with Fascio
–=– A Tour Of Italy –=–
Great Coat Of Arms of Italy during Fascist era from1929 to 1943.
This was displayed during the rule of the National Fascist Party.
Flag of the Repubblica Sociale Italiana,
during Mussolini’s reign.
Mussolini’s personal flag
dell’Arco della Vittoria di Bolzano
Liceo Scientifico a Bergamo (College)
Italian Military Uniform Fasci pins
Fasci in front of obelisk
Acquedotto consorziale, Marano Principato Cs.
Palazo Ducezio, Sicilia
Note the Lions head – representing the Tribe of Judah
Left: una Statua dello Stadio dei Marmi
sui Mosaici del Foro Italico
(Wikipedia excerpt)
Chamber of Fasci and Corporations (Italian: Camera dei Fasci e delle Corporazioni) was the official name of the Italian Chamber of Deputies established on January 19, 1939, to replace the Chamber of Deputies during the 30th legislature of Italy. The Chamber was vested with legislative power from March 23, 1939 to August 2, 1943, during the height of the regime of Benito Mussolini’s National Fascist Party. Members of the chamber were called ‘”national councilors” (consiglieri nazionali) rather than deputies. The councilors of the chamber did not represent geographical constituencies, but the different branches of the trade and industry of Italy, thus reflecting the corporativist idea of fascist ideology.
Councilors were elected for terms of undetermined length and automatically lost their seats upon their defection from the branch they did represent. Renewal of the legislature was ordered by decree by the King of Italy, on specific instruction of the head of government (Mussolini).
Appointment
No elections took place in Italy between 1934 and 1946. The new founded Chamber of the Fascists and the Corporations replaced the Chamber of Deputies of Italy during the spring of 1939, with the legislative body coming into effect on March 23, 1939, as the 30th legislature of the Kingdom of Italy. Unlike earlier elections for the legislature held under the Fascist era, popular suffrage was not put into effect. Instead, candidates were simply delivered under the pretext of a parliamentary reform, replacing the elections system with a body comprising only candidates of the various corporations of Italy, fulfilling Benito Mussolini’s vow of enacting a complete corporativist system.
(End excerpt)
If one reads this with awareness, one quickly realizes that the United States is a corporativist nation. Though different in structure, no one can doubt that corporations are the power structure and lobbying force behind our representatives. The big picture reveals that the U.S. government is a major investor/stock owner of all major corporations around the world, making this true ideal and requirement of fascism (government owning corporations) a transparent reality.
How many politicians go on to be board of directors and CEO’s of the very corporations they once regulated in government?
–=–
Palazzo Montecitorio, seat of the Chamber of Fasci and Corporations.
Today this is the office of the Chamber of Deputies of Italy
The symbols of fascism obviously remain…
Ecuador state flag with fasci
Coat of arms of the Swiss canton of St. Gallen since 1803
Norwegian Police Badge with double Fasci
Switzerland’s Military Flag circa 1800
Willam Tell near Fasce
Emblem of Spanish Civil Guard
Fasce, Sword, and Crown
Grand Coat of arms of Vilnius, Lithuania
Fasce and the scales of Justice Unity, Justice…
Original Flag of the British Union of Fascists
Ancient Roman Fasci
In ancient Rome, the bodyguards of a magistrate carried fasci.
–=–
According to Legion XXIV website:
The FASCES was a cylindrical bundle of elm or birch rods bound together by red bands, from which an ax head projected; and which was borne by Lictors (attendants and body guards) before a Consul or high Magistrate, as a symbol of their authority.
Stephen Phenow, Editor of the Strategikon, provides the following: “The Fasces was adopted from the Etruscans. It symbolized the power of life or death that a Roman Magistrate had over the Roman citizen; who could be scourged by the birch rods, representing physical punishment for transgressions; or be beheaded by the axe for serious crimes.”
The lowering of the Fasces was a form of salute to a higher official. It was also an emblem of unity and power; being used as an icon on coins and “coats of arms” long after the times of Ancient Rome. The number of Lictores in the Republic varied by magistrial rank. A Dictator was honored with 24 lictores, each carrying a Fasces; a Consul was awarded 12, while a Praetor was allowed 6. Stepen Phenow also adds: “The Imperator (Emperor) usually was a Consul as well, so he would maintain 12 licores carrying fasces. Emperor Claudius had this number proceed him before entering a captured town in Britannia.” After the reign of Emperor Domitian (81-96AD), the Imperator was accorded 24 lictores. Benito Mussolini’s Italian “Fascist”Party of the 1930’s, derived its name from the Fasces, which it had adopted as an emblem in 1919.
The reconstruction shown here was assembled by the Commander in February 2002. The body is 42 inches (1012mm) long with a 4.5 inch (115mm) stem extending from the bottom. It weighs 14 pounds and is composed of Thirty-One 3/4 inch (20mm) wood dowels and has a diameter of 5 inches (128mm). The axe head is 6 inches (152mm), from point to point, and extends 3 inches (76mm) from the bundle. Some 36 feet (11 meters) of 3/4 inch burgandy leather strapping was used to bind the bundle. In some Fasces, the axe head was placed in the center of the length of the body. There are also some representations of the Fasces showing two axe heads, one per side, extending from the opposite sides of the rod bundle.
The word fasces means “bundle” and refers to the fact that it is a bundle of rods, which surrounded an ax in the middle. In ancient Rome, the lictors carried fasces before consul, praetors and dictators, i.e., magistrates that held imperium (which means that they had the right to command and interpret the flight of the birds). Other people escorted by lictors with fasces were Vestal Virgins, governors, and the commanders of legions.
During the empire, the fasces of the emperor were distinguished from those of the magistrates by laurels. This was a republican custom, however: on festive occasions (e.g., a military victory), fasces could be crowned with laurel. On the other hand, when the city was in mourning, the fasces were sometimes cloaked. If the ax was left out, it could mean that the magistrate wanted to request something from the people or had something to apologize for.
The fasces were a symbol of authority, but the precise meaning is unknown. It is often claimed that the rods could be used to lash people, and the ax to execute them. This may have been true in the days of the monarchy, but not during the republic. After the Laws of the twelve tables, no Roman magistrate could summarily execute a Roman citizen.
The Romans believed that the fasces were introduced in Rome from Etruria. Again, this may be true, but the tradition is open to some criticism. So far, only one set of fasces has been found in Etruria, in the Tomba del littore near Vetulonia, in 1890. This find has been hailed as a confirmation of the tradition, but it should be noted that the archaeologists only found a lot of small rusty flakes, which were interpreted as Etruscan fasces, which, they had to admit, were not identical to Roman fasces. They were entirely made of metal, the ax had two blades, and finally: the Etruscan fasces were extremely small. It has been said that the find from Vetulonia is only a miniature model, but this is poor method: to rescue an interpretation, one introduces a hypothesis.
–=–
So this international symbol of fascism permeates all three branches of government and hangs openly and without fear in the very Halls of Congress that pump out tyranny and oppression on a daily basis.
But our original question was about the force of law; Sheriffs, police, Marshals, and military men…
Is it possible that these men are of a Fraternal Brotherhood unknown to most of their citizen victims?
Her Majesty’s Fascist Police
The National Transportation Safety Board
Customs And Border Protection
–=–
“Maine Masonry has many notable men in its ranks; men who have accomplished great things in the eyes of a grateful society by performing acts that are just a part of doing their jobs. Our Grand Secretary R.W. Brother Hollis G. Dixon is one of them. He is a Mason who values the act of contributing to his community but would rather not stand in the spotlight for it. He is modest by nature and true to his core beliefs of good citizenship, service, and integrity. Please join us in congratulating Hollis for being named Legendary Trooper of the Maine State Police. Hollis was awarded the honor in a ceremony last week in Augusta and presented with a plaque in recognition of that honor.
“Pictured in the photo from left to right are: Maine State Police Lt. Ralph Pinkham, Retired, who presented the award to Hollis; Maine State Police Captain Hollis “Tom” Dixon, Retired; Gov. John Baldacci; Maine Commissioner of Public Safety Ann Jordan; and Maine State Police Col. Patrick Fleming. Also in attendance but not pictured were other Troopers who are Masons. Captain Guy Savage, Maine State Police, Retired, who was Tom’s first Sgt. when he joined the State Police and Guy’s son, Cpl. Breen Savage, Retired, who Tom helped train when Breen joined the State Police. (Breen supplied the picture). Also Lt. Gerald “Red” Therrien, Retired, who is active in the Shrine and who Tom raised when he was Master of the Maine State Police Masonic Degree Team.”
“Friendship, Morality, and Brotherly Love” Now pay your fine or go to jail!!!
–=–
How about in Canada?
–=–
And for these Masonic Officers in their Morality and Brotherly Love
to exact (extort) from the people they police and serve,
the judges who decide on the ethics of their actions would
have to be an organized Fraternity of Brotherly Love as well…
wouldn’t they?
–=–
Lampasas County Courthouse, Texas
Anderson County Courthouse, Texas
Travis County Courthouse, Texas
\
Laying the Masonic Cornerstone
“BERKELEY SPRINGS – A ceremony steeped in nearly 300 years of tradition helped mark the placement of the cornerstone for the new Morgan County Courthouse Saturday.
Freemasons from the West Virginia Grand Lodge in Charleston along with members of Deford Lodge No. 88 in Berkeley Springs held a cornerstone ceremony, which is meant to celebrate the construction of the new building and to remind everyone that all things must be built on a strong foundation.
‘It’s just a public awareness to keep the public involved and a celebration of the community,’ said Charlie Montgomery, a member of Deford Lodge. ‘They are able to come together in a time of sharing and fellowship.'”
–=–
Cumberland, Md
Old Lincoln County Courthouse, New Mexico
Old Cameron County Courthouse, Brownsville Texas
Grand Master Hugh Layne (Left) and Judge Pace
seal Courthouse Cornerstone containing ‘Time Capsule’,
Spartanburg County Detention Facility, SC
Local Missouri Freemason lodge conducting a
brief Masonic cornerstone dedication in Kahoka, Montana
for the new courthouse
–=–
“You must conceal all the crimes of your brother Masons, except murder and treason, and these only at your own option, and should you be summoned as a witness against a brother Mason be always sure to shield him. Prevaricate [falsify], don’t tell the whole truth in his case, keep his secrets, forget the most important points… It may be perjury to do this, it is true, but you’re keeping your obligations, and remember if you live up to your obligation strictly, you’ll be free from sin.”
–Edmond Ronayne, “Masonic Handbook,” (page 183)
–=–
What a frightening realization that the upper levels of the justice system is an Order – a Masonic Rite – a Fraternal Brotherhood ordained to enforce and protect the will of the United States, which was created by the same secret society of Masonry in Order to create, impose, protect, and enforce its will upon all people… of which it calls code. If America is under the control of the Masonic Order that controls the United States, and if America was indeed the “New World” as history records, then America is already under the control of the New World Order.
Why does the DMV offer Masonic license plates as a non-profit venture?
Masonic protection from Masonic police…
–=–
At the Philadelphia Masonic Hall… With an honor guard of troopers standing at ease,
Anthony J. Garvey (center), Chief of Staff of the Grand Lodge,
flanked by Lt. Col. George P. March, P.M. (left), and
Lt. Col. Thomas K. Coury (right), both Deputy Commissioners of the Pennsylvania State Police, await the arrival of
Col. Paul J. Evanko, Commissioner.
Grand Master Ernette (center) is joined (at left) by Deputy Commissioners Lt. Col. Coury and Lt. Col. March
to congratulate (at right) Col. Evanko and Lt. Col. Westcott.
–=–
“On Aug. 22, in the presence of the Right Worshipful Grand Master James L. Ernette, three distinguished members of the Pennsylvania State Police were made Masons-at-Sight in the Masonic Temple, Philadelphia. They are: Colonel Paul J. Evanko, Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police; Lieutenant Colonel Joseph H. Westcott, Deputy Commissioner; and Trooper Roberto Soto.
Corinthian Hall was filled to capacity, including more than a hundred brethren who are troopers and municipal law enforcement officers.
The brethren who served as the conferring Worshipful Masters were: Entered Apprentice Mason’s Degree, Trooper Edward J. Lizewski; Fellowcraft Mason’s Degree, Trooper Charles J. McBreen; and Master Mason’s Degree, Lt. Col. George P. March, P.M.
The brethren of the Pennsylvania State Police Masonic Degree Team who participated in conferring the three degrees are pictured above with the R.W. Grand Lodge Officers and the new Masons. They are (listed alphabetically): James J. Carey; Thomas K. Coury; Walter C. Ditzler, P.M.; Gerald Eaton, J.D.; David W. Escalet; Patrick Foy, J.W.; Bruce Gaton; Stephen S. Heitz; George F. Himmelright, Jr.; Edward M. Kauffman, S.W.; Edward J. Lizewski, J.W.; George P. March, P.M.; Douglas Martin; Charles J. McBreen, J.D.; Charles L. McBreen, P.M.; Carl E. Mease; Kevin M. Organtini; John G. Richards; Phillip Rickert, J.W.; Robert Robbins, W.M.; James J. Schultz; Vaughn Schwalm; Louis M. Vittor, P.M.; and Serell I. Ulrich.
George Washington belonged to the fraternity of Free and Accepted Masons. So did Benjamin Franklin, Charles Lindbergh, Clark Gable and Arnold Palmer.
So do numerous Pennsylvania state troopers, including many current and former high-ranking officers. And now allegations have been raised that law enforcement members of the charitable and social fraternity protected former trooper Michael Evans, a Mason since 1989, when he was faced with sexual-misconduct complaints that in some cases led to convictions.
The allegations are contained in the same federal lawsuit that included previously confidential reports of sexual misconduct within the State Police that recently have made headlines.
How many times have we seen police officers bypass the law in their abuse, rape, and murder of citizens?
How many cases are dismissed by judges of that Order?
–=–
“Today, we assemble as Freemasons to celebrate our heritage.
We do so by honoring the memory of a Brother who took advantage
of a most unique opportunity to play an active role in the development of our state, and in the development of our Grand Lodge.
The Brother is our former Governor George Wesley Atkinson…
Atkinson helped to lay a proper foundation so that Ancient Craft Masonry
could assume a prominent role as a leading institution, even to this day,
just as our state has assumed its rightful place of honor among
the United States of America.”
“In the hallways of the grand lodge headquarters, the walls are crowded
with framed photographs of Masons past and present, but mostly past:
Hubert H. Humphrey, the former vice president; and William J. Bratton, the former police commissioner who is now the chief of police in Los Angeles…”
“New York’s Masons are heavily involved in community service,
underwriting medical research and supplying 29,000 American flags, one for every public school classroom in the city.
But still there are the secret rooms where Masons gather.”
“Two detective chief inspectors among 944 officers in England and Wales with a criminal record. One officer found guilty of gross misconduct after
sending racist and sexist texts is still in his job. Hundreds of others facing
misconduct allegations are allowed to escape punishment by quitting their forces.”
“The Home Office is to block public access to a register of Freemasons within the police service for fear of damaging confidence in the forces.
It marks a realization among ministers that Labour’s early plans to end the Masonic culture in the judicial system is in danger of backfiring by undermining officers who are innocent of any impropriety. Ministers will announce fresh plans for the register of Freemasons, which is currently voluntary, next month. They have yet to decide over calls from a Labour-dominated Commons committee for it to be strengthened by being made compulsory for police to declare their membership of the secretive society but will undertake that those who do so will not be exposed to public scrutiny.
Labour MPs have long campaigned for Freemasonry to be banned in the judicial system, believing that it fosters corruption by encouraging police and judges to feel they are under an obligation to fellow lodge members. Freemasons, however, insist that the society is merely a charitable and social institution, despite its code of secrecy and rituals.
A Home Office official said: “We are not backing away from the need to establish just how widespread Masonic activity is within the forces but it is a question of how to do it. It will not help if police are deterred from being open about their membership because they think it would be raised in trials or disciplinary hearings. There is a case for public access to the register as a gesture of open government but this is outweighed by the risk that defence lawyers might exploit an officer’s membership to suggest he or she is corrupt.”
Earlier this month, Britain’s most senior Masonic judge attacked the Government’s investigations into Freemasonry. Lord Millett, a sitting law lord, accused a parliamentary inquiry of having “absolutely no basis” and being “oppressive”. He said it had led to defendants demanding to know whether judges hearing their cases and police officers giving evidence against them were Masons.
About 20 per cent of judges have refused to reply to a questionnaire issued by Lord Irvine, the Lord Chancellor, asking if they are Freemasons. The voluntary register for police has fared even worse, with only 38,875 of the 126,000 officers in England and Wales responding, of whom just 417 admitted to being Freemasons. There are an estimated 8,000 Masonic lodges in Britain.”
A tale against corruption in Greenwich involving a solicitor
An astonishing tale of one woman’s battle against corruption in Greenwich council involving a struck-off solicitor convicted for fraud points directly to a conspiracy amongst prominent freemasons to wrongfully repossess council properties and throw the rightful owners onto the streets…
They soon found out, by acquiring a copy of the Lincolnshire Freemason’s handbook, that all the solicitors they had used (and as time went by they used most firms in Lincolnshire) were listed as Masons. More important they were able to expose Leslie Oldman architect of the whole devious scheme. With a mixture of delight and consternation they proved he had been struck off as a solicitor ten years before for sustained forgery and misuse of his client funds – a heinous crime for any solicitor. Yet he was still signing his name as “Assistant Borough Solicitor”. They brought this to the attention of just about everyone, but Oldman is still employed by the council.
Mrs. Riley is now convinced that a regular racket has been taking place in Greenwich for a number of years. It goes like this: A family buys its council house, but solicitors acting for them fail to pay a paltry sum and Oldman is able to step in and repossess. The house is then sold for a song and the partners collect the difference. This time, however, they hadn’t realised Mrs. Riley’ tenacity…
——————————————————————————————————————————
UNITED KINGDOM: The Freemasons and Police
Have the British police fallen under the sway of Freemasons? The boss of Scotland Yard and officials at the Home Office say they are worried about the Freemasons’ influence over senior police officers. Several cases of corruption are said to have been covered up at the bidding of the brotherhood.
At least one in seven male magistrates in the U.K. are members of the Freemason brotherhood, according to a first official survey of the judiciary’s links with the secret organization…
UNITED KINGDOM: FREEMASONS BEND TO PRESSURE
Police officers and local government officials figure largely among the 50 British Freemasons who have resigned from their lodges on claims their careers would be damaged if they were publicly identified as members of “the Craft,”…
UNITED KINGDOM: THE PARLIAMENT WANTS NAMES OF FREEMASONS
Senior officials of the ruling council of British Freemasonry, the United Grand Lodge of England (UGL) , face charges of contempt of parliament if they fail to provide the Commons Select Committee on Home Affairs with the names of 163 members connected with police corruption and miscarriages of justice…
UNITED KINGDOM: FINGER-POINTING AT FREEMASONS
Gavin Purser, president of the United Grand Lodge of England’s Board of General Purposes, has reluctantly given the names of 16 Freemasons linked to a number of controversial police investigations in the 1970s and 1980s to Chris Mullin, chairman of the Commons Home Affairs Committee…
UNITED KINGDOM: FREDERICK CRAWFORD
Prime minister John Major has personally appointed a Freemason, Frederick Crawford, to the £80,000-per-year, part-time post as chairman of the new Criminal Cases Review Authority (CCRA)…
UNITED KINGDOM: NEW WARNING ON MASON LINKS
The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has drawn up national guidelines warning police officers that membership of the Freemasons (or other secretive and influential societies) could “compromise their integrity as impartial upholders of the law.
UNITED KINGDOM: POLICE SUPPORT FREEMASON SECRECY
Following the first-ever debate of its kind, the Police Federation rejected a motion by 429 votes to 391 to compel all officers belonging to the Freemason Brotherhood or other secret societies to declare their membership publicly…
–=–
When a government ceases to protect its people and instead that government protects itself from its people, and when the servants of the public become their masters through contract and forced debt slavery, then government is not of the people or for the people. It is then the enemy of the people.
–=– The Legal Perversion
Of Liberty And Freedom –=–
So what other proper nouns did these Masons go out of their way to capitalize in specification when designing this corporate charter called the Constitution?
Let’s take a look at the word “Liberty”.
We can see that this noun is capitalized as well, signifying that it represents a specific (proper) type of liberty. As with all of the words included within this constitution, each one carries with it a duel meaning. One is conversational and general to the English language, and denotes the natural state of things. The other is specific to legal and corporate things, and thus is capitalized to ensure that the distinction is clear. The constitution refers to the only type of liberty that a corporation can control, which is political liberty.
Look at the difference between natural liberty and political Liberty as defined by Webster’s:
lib·er·ty
noun \ˈli-bər-tē\
plurallib·er·ties
Definition of LIBERTY
(Natural liberty)
1 : the quality or state of being free:
1a: the power to do as one pleases
1b: freedom from physical restraint
1c:freedom from arbitrary or despotic control
1e:the power of choice
(Political Liberty)
1d:the positive(man’s positive law) enjoyment of various social, political, or economic rights and privileges
2a:a right or immunity enjoyed by prescription or by grant: privilage
2b:permission especially to go freely within specified limits
–=–
The difference between these two meanings of the same word is paramount in importance. In fact, even this definition is an oxymoron. For how can one be free if limits are placed upon that free movement?
The answer is actually a simple one. For the constitution only refers to a specific type of liberty, which is “political Liberty”. In fact, it would be pointless for the constitution to refer to natural liberty as this natural right exists despite the constitution. The constitution did not create nature or God. Only through contract, Trust, and power of attorney can natural rights be squelched by political rights.
While the general term of “liberty” denotes a basic natural form of being free both in life and from tyranny, the opposite is true of the word used in the constitution. The Masonic use of the proper noun “Liberty” denotes a very specific (proper) political use of the word, and thus it becomes as Webster’s describes above a revokable privilege instead of a natural, God-given right.
Perhaps this is easier to understand if we compare it to any other contract you have ever entered into, where you have agreed to follow a certain set of rules as contractually (constitutionally) laid out by the other party or corporation, such as in a gym or club membership. This agreement gives you the political “Liberty” to do only what is allowed by that person or corporation, and takes away any other “liberty” you might have. For instance, a no smoking rule may be enforced. So as a citizen of the United States, you have only political Liberties with no natural liberty. Any natural liberty you might have has simply not been restricted and licensed yet – it has not been made legal or illegal. In other words, if you break any of the increasingly lawless laws of this government (and there are now too many to count or comprehend), you have just broken your contract. In the spiritual jurisdiction of the United States, a citizen only has political “Liberty” (granted privileges) and no other form of “liberty”. For government cannot control your natural rights and liberty to express them without your tacit agreement to be a member of the United States corporation and give up your natural rights for its political rights. Thus, “Liberty” is political, which means that your liberty is a privilege, not a right. The constitution can only grant (create) political rights, not natural ones. Again, understanding the importance in the concept that God and only God can give natural rights is the shield and saber against government political oppression. This does not require actual belief in any tangible or ritualistic “god” or “God”, only the realization that you were born with your rights in nature, without government or a constitution, and that you are the only one who can give those away in exchange for man’s law over nature (God) and yourself.
Citizenship = membership.
Membership = political rights (benefits).
Just as an employee of Walmart must submit to the political Liberty of the Walmart corporation or be punished as an “employee”, so to must an employee (citizen) of the United States submit to the political Liberty of the United States or be punished.
It is perhaps more wise to use the Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856 definition here as this dictionary is quite reflective of the times in which the constitution was created, and was adopted into the law of the United States as the official dictionary.
LIBERTY. Freedom from restraint. The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.
2. Liberty is divided into civil, natural, personal, and political.
3. Civil liberty is the power to do whatever is permitted by the constitution of the state and the laws of the land. It is no other than natural liberty, so far restrained by human laws, and no further, operating equally upon all the citizens, as is necessary and expedient for the general advantage of the public.
(Note: the “public” is government, thus the “public good” is what is good for government)
4. That system of laws is alone calculated to maintain civil liberty, which leaves the citizen entirely master of his own conduct, except in those points in which the public good requires some direction and restraint. When a man is restrained in his natural liberty by no municipal laws but those which are requisite to prevent his violating the natural law, and to promote the greatest moral and physical welfare of the community, he is legally possessed of the fullest enjoyment of his civil rights of individual liberty. But it must not be inferred that individuals are to judge for themselves how far the law may justifiably restrict their individual liberty; for it is necessary to-the welfare of the commonwealth, that the law should be obeyed; and thence is derived the legal maxim, that no man may be wiser than the (man’s) law.
5. Natural libertyis the right which nature gives to all mankind, of diposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consonant to their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and that they do not in any way abuse it to the prejudice of other men.
6. Personal liberty isthe independence of our actions of all other will than our own. It consists in the power of locomotion, of changing situation, or removing one’s person to whatever place one’s inclination may direct, without imprisonment or restraint, unless by due course of law.
(Note: Don’t get pulled in to “personal liberty”, for it is political and has exceptions, where a judge can “decide” through “due course of man’s law” to take it away. Never turn from God and nature – for a natural right is above all other forms.)
7. Political liberty may be defined to be, the security by which, from the constitution, form and nature of the established government, the citizens enjoy civil liberty. No ideas or definitions are more distinguishable than those of civil and political liberty, yet they are generally confounded. The political liberty of a state is based upon those fundamental laws which establish the distribution of legislative and executive powers. The political liberty of a citizen is that tranquillity of mind, which is the effect of an opinion that he is in perfect security; and to insure this security, the government must be such that one citizen shall not fear another.
8. In the English law, by liberty is meant a privilege held by grant or prescription, by which some men enjoy greater benefits than ordinary subjects. A liberty is also a territory, with some extraordinary privilege.
9. By liberty or liberties, is understood a part of a town or city, as the Northern Liberties of the city of Philadelphia…
–=–
The difference between natural and political liberty is the difference between having a government and not having a govern-ment (being controlled). A government that protects natural rights would be one that is just. It would protect natural law and defend against all other forms except valid contract law (lawful agreements between two or more people). But the United States government goes out of its way to suppress natural rights and liberties in order to replace them with political or “civil” rights and liberties. In other words, the United States seeks to destroy any connection of its citizens to the natural law (to God). And this is when a government is considered no longer just and moral. This is when government is fascist. And when we pledge our allegiance to its flag, we have no idea that “Liberty and Justice for All” is the socialist/fascist kind of political liberty and justice for all citizens, not all men.
–=–
How about the word “Welfare” as used in the Masonic Constitution?
Look at the absolute opposite difference in definitions presented here by Webster’s:
wel·fare
noun \ˈwel-ˌfer\
Definition of WELFARE
(Natural welfare)
1 :the state of doing well especially in respect to good fortune, happiness, well-being, or prosperity <must look out for your ownwelfare>
(Political Welfare)
2a:aid in the form of money or necessities for those in need
2b:an agency or program through which such aid is distributed
–=–
Again, we see here the very opposite meanings of this dualistic word Welfare as a proper noun.
Consider for a moment the actual government Welfare System and Agency in the United States. Social Security was created in Title 42 of United States Code (US CODE).
Can you guess what this chapter of US CODE is called?
U.S.C. TITLE 42: THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
Some refer to the Social Security system as unconstitutional, and yet here in the constitution is the very reference that makes it and the enforcement system around it indeed constitutional. For the only form of welfare that the United States corporation can give you is the type that you contract to receive – political Welfare as a monetary instrument (Security). Your own personal or natural welfare is your natural right and responsibility. Government can only provide political Welfare to citizens under contract. And that privilege provided by government, as we see in modern times, can in fact be detrimental to your natural welfare and health. The problem is that by default, a citizen agrees to give up his or her natural welfare in exchange for the government privilege of political Welfare.
For any political right taken by men from government will replace his or her natural right. Any political liberty taken will replace natural liberty. And any political freedom taken from government will make every man naturally less free.
Oh, did you believe that the constitution gave you freedom?
Well, you were right, for it gives you nothing but political freedom.
FREEDOM, Liberty; the right to do what is not forbidden by law. Freedom does not preclude the idea of subjection to law; indeed, it presupposes the existence of some legislative (man’s law) provision, the observance of which insures freedom to us, by securing (forcing) the like observance from others. –Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856
Defending Freedom… or forcing and enforcing it?
Freedom = To obey the Law of the Law Society
–=–
I always believed that freedom was a choice. But indeed, the only freedom a citizen of the United States can enjoy is the revokable privilege of a political right – which means that he must obey the law no matter how opposed it is to natural law. Freedom is a political privilege, not a natural right. And it can be taken away at any time. For free men give up that natural right to accept political entitlement and benefit – trading the natural state of being free for the political right to obey the law (freedom). So we must always remember that freedom is a government granted privilege, and it specifically means that you must obey the law of government. This is the difference between natural and political freedom. For political freedom only means to obey the law – even when the law is lawless and is specifically designed to take away all of your natural rights. For political freedom squashes your natural right to be free. And this is the only Freedom that is protected by the constitution – the kind that takes away your state of being free and responsible for your own actions.
As Webster’s has so eloquently differentiated above, when the constitution proclaims that it shall “promote the general Welfare“, it was specifically laying the legal groundwork for everything that is within Title 42, including Social Security and Medicare, which are massive investment pension funds of government that funnel billions each year in taxation, and which government requires citizens to contribute to. When tax is no longer a choice and when tax debtors are imprisoned, government has shown itself as a tyrant.
Of course, it seems that no one has considered that this little word in the constitution that has inspired such a dramatic and tyrannical “Welfare Program” in the United States is also the very thing that makes Obama-care (the new socialist government health care insurance plan) a valid corporate endeavor of this corporate United States, forcing political Welfare upon the citizens of the United States. After all, the vast majority of this Obama-Care Act was placed into US CODE – TITLE 42: THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE!
We must also examine the first phrase in the constitution, which is “We, the People…”.
I’m sure by this point I shouldn’t need to try and convince you that the capitalized version of a word is very different than the un-capitalized version of the same word. The word “People” is no exception. Can you guess why this word was capitalized?
The word “We” signifies the signers of the constitution who make the claim to be the “People” of the United States.
It may be easiest to understand what this means by simple interchanging the word “People” with the word “undersigned”. For the Signers were “the People”.
We, the undersigned, in Order…
If this phrase had meant in general terms all the people in the 13 colonies, there would be no reason to be proper with this noun. And if this was the case, for this to have been a lawfully binding contract on all of those people, every last man, woman, and child would have had to sign this constitution.
But as a proper noun, this word “People” refers solely to the men signing this constitution, with added emphasis in the word “We”.
The constitution in fact cannot refer to any man other than those who signed that document, just as a contract from Walmart would have no effect on anyone but the specific People who sign that document. If Walmart sent you a letter tomorrow stating that you must accept Walmart Healthcare you would laugh incredulously and throw the letter where it belongs – in the trash. Yet as a member of the corporation of the United States who receives the benefits of that citizenship, you are required by your United States employer to take its Health and Welfarecalled Obama-Care.
In other words, it is your political right to have Obama-Care forced upon you, because you gave up your natural right to not have it forced upon you through your contractual nature with the United States as its citizen.
Webster’s makes this distinction nicely…
———————————————————————————————————————-
1peo·ple
noun \ˈpē-pəl\
pluralpeople
Definition of PEOPLE
(Natural people vs specific Political People)
1 plural:human beings making up a group or assembly or linked by a common interest…
3 plural: the members of a family or kinship
4 plural:the mass of a community as distinguished from a special class <disputes between the people and the nobles> —often used by Communists to distinguish Communists from other people
5 pluralpeoples: a body of persons that are united by a common culture, tradition, or sense of kinship, that typically have common language, institutions, and beliefs, and that often constitute a politically organized group
6 :lower animals usually of a specified kind or situation
7 :the body of enfranchised citizens of a state
–=–
TO ENFRANCHISE.
To make free toincorporate a man in a society or body politic. –Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856
–=–
Here again we see the distinction between people as human beings (all people in the country) and the People (the special class) who signed the constitution. As an Order of Masons, the People in the constitution are the men who signed it.
The word “we” is defined as –
“I and the rest of a group that includes me: you and I : you and I and another or others : I and another or others not including you —used as pronoun of the first person plural”
In any contract, the only people affected by said contract are the signers of that contract, and this requires free will, acquiescence, consent, and a meeting of the minds before the signature is applied. But there is no mind behind the constitution, for it is artificial, and no meeting of minds can be had. Acceptance of that document as if it were a contract is a unilateral submission to the Federal Government. And while your acceptance forces you to accept terms and laws, government is not bound by and can change that constitution at any time. You, the individual, can not.
No man has the power to contract other men without their consent. Thus, we can also see the clear distinction made in this first sentence:
“We the People of the United States, in Order… do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
The People of the United States are quite different from the people of the 50 states united in America. The United States, according to the constitution, is a 10 mile square tract of land called a corporate municipal “District”, which is not in America. Whereas the United States of America is the entirety of the 50 States and all people within those 50 countries, the United States is a specific corporation. The United States of America were the 13 colonies. The United States is specifically and distinctly different and outside of the 50 specific states united in America. The People of the United States were not the people of America – the “lower animals” naturally born in their countries.
And as we have now discovered, this Order of Masons was indeed the People of the constitution.
But these People had something else in common… their blood!
For they were in fact the People as defined above as “the members of a family or kinship“.
–=– The Blood Oath… More Than Meets The Eye –=–
George Washington has quite the royal bloodline. He is 2nd cousin, 9 times removed from current Prince William of England – who is the 27th great grandson of Charlemagne.
Thomas Jefferson is the 6th cousin, 5 times removed of the current Queen Elizabeth II.
It turns out that all past presidents of the United States corporation are cousins of this royal line.
Barack Husein Obama, the current president, has this as his lineage:
William The Conquerer – 22nd Great Grandson
Anne Boleyn, Queen of England – 1st cousin, 15 time removed
Henry V, King of England – 1st cousin, 19 times removed
Henry VIII, King of England – 1st cousin 16 times removed
Mary I, Queen of Scott’s, 3rd cousin, 14 times removed
James Madison, U.S. President, 3rd cousin, 8 times removed
Harry Truman and Abe Lincoln, U.S. Presidents – 7th cousins
Jimmy Carter, U.S. President – 8th Cousin
Dick Cheney, U.S. vice-President for Bush Jr. – 8th cousin
Gerald Ford, u.S. President – 9th cousin
Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President, 10th cousin, 6 times removed
Sarah Palin, Governor and Obama’s competition – 10th cousin
George Bush Sr/Jr, as are all presidents, are both of this royal line. Bush Jr. is related to:
Vlad The Impaler (A.K.A. Dracula) – 32nd Great Grandson
Diana, Princess of Wales – 11th cousin, 2 times removed
Millard Fillmore and James Garfield, U.S. Presidents – 4th cousins
Franklin Peirce, U.S. President – 5th cousin
Gerald Ford, William Taft, Calvin Coolridge, U.S. Presidents – 6th cousins
Theodore Roosevelt, Abe Lincoln, U.S. Presidents – 7th cousins
Richard Nixon, U.S. President – 9th cousins
Dick Cheny, Bush’s vice-President – 9th cousin, 1 time removed
John Kerry, Senator and Obama Cabinet, and Bush’s competition – 9th cousin, 2 times removed
Barrack Obama, current U.S. President – 11th cousin
Sarah Palin, Governor and Obama’s competition – 11th cousin
And of course in true incestuous fashion, George W. Bush is 9th cousins with Barbara Peirce, his own mother!
**Note: John Kerry is also the 34th Great Grandson of Vlad The Impaler.
**Note: These are very incomplete lists.
Here is a picture of Former President Franklin Peirce, who’s granddaughter Barbara Peirce married George H. W. Bush and bore the president named George W Bush. Next to that is a current picture of Mitt Romney. The resemblance of the bloodline is uncanny.
–=–
So who were the signers of the constitution of the United States that were also this Order of People?
Nothing more than cousins and offspring of the kings and queens of England – Master Masons with intentions other than the free state of all people (animals) and with the intent to establish a charter for the incorporation of power in the “New World” for their own bloodline “People”, with all other people subject to that power.
George W. Bush, Deist Master Mason Extraordinaire
Jerusalem Post, 1994
With guest speaker, President and Mason Bill Clinton?
Roosevelt
Gerald Ford (real name: Leslie Lynch King)
Notice the crescent and star
Harry S. Truman
Warren G. Harding
Ben Franklin
George Washington Masonic Temple Museum Excerpt from the museum literature:
“The movement to erect a Masonic Memorial started at a meeting held in Alexandria, Virginia, on February 10, 1910. Upon invitation of Alexandria-Washington Lodge No. 22, the representatives of 18 Grand Lodges assembled in the sacred precincts of the Lodge Room of the city Hall of Alexandria to consider the subject in all its details. The following year, February 22, 1911, 27 representatives of 27 Grand Jurisdictions assembled and organized the George Washington Masonic National Memorial Association. The association unanimously adopted and approved a resolution to erect a Masonic Temple as a memorial to George Washington, under the auspices of the Lodge. The financial policy of the Association from the very beginning has been “pay as you go”, so that there is no indebtedness in connection with its construction. Ground was broken June 5, 1922…”
“The edifice is designed in the classic architecture of Greece and Rome. Situated on a 36 acre tract of land, it rises 333 feet from its foundation, and contains 9 floors.The records of the Lodge are virtually an unbroken chain of historic Masonic events from 1783 to the present time. All of the records, most of the original furniture, the Master’s Chair–presented to the Lodge by Washington and occupied by in 1788-1789 while Master–the original portrait of Washington by Williams, as well as several other items are still in possession of the Lodge.”
–=–
Sharing the Traditions of Our Founding Fathers
“Masons were active in Massachusetts even before 1733, the year the first Provincial Grand Lodge of Masons was formally organized by Henry Price. Today, the Grand Lodge in Boston remains the oldest continuously operating Masonic organization in the Western Hemisphere.
In the early years, Masonry numbered among its members some of the nation’s most influential citizens – among them George Washington, Henry Knox, Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock and Paul Revere.”
“Of these (Masonic teachings) may you partake in all their purity and satisfaction; and we will assure ourselves that your attachment to this social plan will increase; and that under the auspices of your encouragement, assistance and patronage, the Craft will attain its highest ornament, perfection, and praise. And it is our ardent prayer, that when your light shall be no more visible in this earthly temple, you may be raised to the All Perfect Lodge above; be seated on the right of the Supreme Architect of the Universe, and there receive the refreshment your labors merited.”
–=–
So were all the common people born equal?
Under God, perhaps. Under the constitution, absolutely not.
Remember, all people would include all black people as well. But Negros weren’t considered people in the constitution, and the founding fathers were most certainly plantation slave-owners! And let’s face it, women were hardly complete people either in terms of the fabled and fallacious “born equal” clauses that get parroted by unabashedly ill-informed patriots and nationalists out there. No vote = no equality.
Obviously, the constitution did not include Negros (slaves) as People.
And don’t even get me started on the genocide of the Native Indians, referred to as savages!
This again shows you clearly that the “People” referred to in the constitution did not include “all” (or any) common “people”, and thus the definitions of these capitalized legal words is paramount to our understanding of the true intent of these Masonic founding fathers. All men, according to the original constitution, are certainly not created equal. Some were in fact 3/5 men for purposes of statistical data in taxation, and the female ones weren’t really anything at all. The status of a legal and equal “woman” citizen was created only after “civil rights” was created, and so the female of the species man was able to assume the legal status of a male in contractual servitude as a wo-man. This did not create natural equality, for there is no such thing. It only created a political status. This specifically female version of man (mankind) furthers our understanding that the constitution was nothing but a legal document that only applied to specific artificial persons (as a legal status). Only God decides what is equal, and nature takes care of the rest. Equality will always be nothing if not a state of mind in all men (male and female), not a punishable, contractual obligation.
So indeed, this lets us know that the word “People” and the word “Men” were used to denote a specific legal status, not generally all men as natural flesh and blood beings, and certainly not colored men.
And again, I hope you take notice that people (as in the common human beings) were defined as “lower animals usually of a specified kind or situation’. We find this legal definition repeated in various chapters of U.S. Code, where man is defined as animal and is managed as a resource (chattel controlled through “human resources”).
The term blood oath as a sacra-ment should right about now take upon itself a whole new meaning…
–=–
Excerpts From The Holy Masonic Bible
–=–
This 1942 Masonic Bible quotes many writings, most notably Albert Pike’s: “Morals and Dogma”. Then follows a question and answer section, and these read like a history lesson in true American and Masonic history – the forbidden kind. Here I have reprinted some of those quotes for our purposes:
Begin excerpts:
“A Lodge” is defined to be an assemblage of Freemasons, duly congregated, having the sacred writings, square, and compass, and a charter, or warrant of constitution, authorizing them to work. The room or place in which they meet, representing some part of King Solomon’s Temple, is also called the Lodge…” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma
“Force, unregulated or ill-regulated, is not only wasted in the void, like that of gunpowder burned in the open air, and steam unconfined by science; but, striking in the dark, and its blows meeting only in the air, they recoil and bruise itself. It is destruction and ruin, it is the volcano, the earthquake, the cyclone;– not growth and progress. It is Polyphemus blinded, striking at random, and falling headlong among the sharp rocks by the impetus of his own blows… The blind force of the people is a Force that must be economized, and also managed, as the blind Force of steam, lifting the ponderous iron arms and turning the large wheels, is made to bore and rifle the canon and to weave the most delicate lace. It must be regulated by Intellect.” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma
**Author’s Note: The U.S. military is a force regulated by Masonry, in order to keep the blind force of the common people (the employed) on a steady course to support and supply the nation and bloodlines.
“Christianity taught the doctrine of FRATERNITY; but repudiated that of political EQUALITY, by continually inculcating obedience to Caesar, and to those lawfully in authority. Masonry was the first apostle of EQUALITY. In the Monastery there is fraternity and equality, but no liberty. Masonry added that also, and claimed for man the three-fold heritage, (political)LIBERTY, EQUALITY, and FRATERNITY.” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma
“All religions express symbolism; since we can describe only what we see, and the true objects of religion are THE SEEN… All language is symbolic, so far as it applied to mental and spiritual phenomena and action. All words have, primarily, a material sense, however they may afterward get, for the ignorant, a spiritual non-sense.” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma
**Author’s Note: Pike here is speaking of the non-sense of the citizenry of the United States, who put spiritual relevance to the constitution, as well as follow religious dogma without understanding the hidden symbols and meaning of its words.
“After you become a Master Mason, no matter what added Masonic honor may come to you, no matter how high you may rise in the symbolic branches of the order, if you keep your vows as a Master Mason you have attained all there is, fulfilled all there is and received all there is to be received that fraternity and brotherhood, existing under a common impulse, can dispense among those who embrace the laws and edicts of a common procedure… Masonry, after all, is but a rule for orderly righteousness.” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma
**Author’s Note: “Orderly righteousness” describes government, the BAR society, law enforcement (Fraternities), congress, etc…
MOST EXCELLENT MASTER – Dedicated to the memory of King Solomon – The Masonic tradition upon which the degree is founded is described in the ancient Book of Constitutions, in the following words: “…it is still retained by us as a memorial of the method adopted by the King of Israel to distinguish the most skilful portion of the craft, and to reward them for their services in behalf of the fraternity.”
ORDER OF THE RED CROSS – “The Order of the Red Cross is founded upon Truth, recognizing the GOD OF TRUTH as the only true and living Deity… Influenced in a measure by his Jewish Friend, PrinceZerubbabel –(Chosen God)– and believing in the One God as did Israel, Darius registered a vow with God that he would rebuild His Temple at Jerusalem… The Law of Judaism was active, educating and preparing us for Christianity. As the most exalted TRUTH was implicitly present in Judaism and is now explicitly present in Christianity, so the candidate finds the TRUTH OF TRUTHS implicit in the Order of the Red Cross, but explicit in the Order of the Temple… As Judaism prepared the world for Christianity, so is the Illustrious Order of the Red Cross a preparation for the Christian Order of the Temple.”
REBUILDING THE TEMPLE – “Released from captivity by the decree of the great Cyrus, issued B.C. 536, the Jews, led by Zerubbabel, reached the then desolated Jerusalem on the 20th day of Tebeth, B.C. 535, and began building the Second Temple. This was finished the 23rd day of Adar, B.C. 515.”
**Author’s Note: Zerubbabel was the head of the tribe of Judah during the time of the return from the Babylon exile. He was the prime builder of the second Temple, which was later re-constructed by King Herod. He led the first group of captives back to Jerusalem and began rebuilding the Temple on the old site. For some 20 years he was closely associated with prophets, priests, and kings until the new Temple was dedicated and the Jewish sacrificial system was re-established. The “Third Temple” referred to above represents the building of the 3rd Temple of Solomon. Remember this above all else, for this goal is coming to fruition…
–=– Rebuilding Solomon’s Temple Creating A Religious Racial War –=–
The Israel National News reported on 7/30/2012:
“Romney’s love for Jerusalem is part of his Mormon faith’s 170-year-old ties to Israel and its dictate to “rebuild the city and the Temple.”…
(Mark) Paredes, author of the newspaper’s “Jews and Mormons” blog, said that Latter Day Saints (LDS) “have dedicated the Land of Israel for the gathering of the Jewish people on many occasions, beginning with Elder Orson Hyde in 1841. In 1845, all of the apostles called on the Jews ‘in the name of the Messiah, to prepare, to return to Jerusalem in Palestine; and to rebuild that city and temple unto the Lord.’”
Public places in Netanya and on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem have been dedicated to Hyde.
*Israel is the only country in the world whose creation was expressly called for and supported by Mormon leaders,” according to Paredes who added, “George Albert Smith, LDS Church President at the time of Israel’s creation in 1948, publicly and privately assured many Jewish leaders of his support for their efforts to establish a Jewish state.”
*Israel Bonds were first issued in 1951. One year later, Church President David O. McKay purchased $5,000 of Israel Bonds on behalf of the church, stating that he was doing this ‘to show our sympathy with the effort being made to establish the Jews in their homeland.’”
Romney’s love for Israel apparently is a personal love and not a political posture. Paredes wrote, “As more and more Jews and Israelis become familiar with the history of LDS-Jewish relations, they will better understand why Mormons feel a special closeness to them.”…”
“MK Zevulun Orlev of the Jewish Home party has called for massive reforms, including new Basic Laws, in order to establish a Third Temple in Jerusalem.
In an article (PDF) published in advance of the fast of Tisha B’Av in the weekly Hebrew journal Olam Katan, entitled “Internal and Legislative Reform,” Orlev wrote that the Temple must be rebuilt in Jerusalem and that “fundamental changes” to Israeli society and government were necessary in order to realize the success of the project.
Besides spiritual reform and the creation of a cadre of religious experts capable of running the Temple, Orlev argued that the government — “assuming the government will choose to be democratic” — must turn back dissent surrounding the project.
“It will be necessary to defeat no-confidence motions, to overcome the hostile, left-wing, secular media, and to ignore eye-rolling economists who will say it’s a waste of public funds,” he wrote.
To forestall appeals to the High Court of Justice, Orlev advocated the legislation of a new Basic Law that would guarantee funding and manpower and protect the Third Temple from prosecution.
“The law will also protect the [Third Temple] project from accusations of discrimination, inequality of women in the Temple service, and animal cruelty in the offering of sacrifices,” Orlev continued.
Orlev acknowledged that to remove the “religious and political impediment” to his plan, namely the presence of the al-Aqsa Mosque and Dome of the Rock atop the Temple Mount, would mean that the “billion-strong Muslim world would surely launch a world war.” However, he added, “everything political is temporary and there is no stability,” and ”Of late we’re witnessed dramatic political changes that have occurred in many Arab countries.”
Now, I don’t know about you, but this is one of the most arrogant displays of carelessness and foulness I have ever beheld. To openly admit to the idea of starting a racial and religious war as planned for centuries is the epitome of Zionist horror and terrorism.
The rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple is the holy goal of international Masonry, this is clear. The Masonic Order is often referred to as the re-builders of Solomon’s Temple.
The “Third Temple“, or Ezekiel’s Temple (Hebrew: Beit haMikdash haShlishi), is a Jewish Holy Temple architecturally described and prophesied in the Book of Ezekiel, a house of prayer for all people with a sacrificial service. It is noted by Ezekiel as an eternal edifice and permanent dwelling place of the God of Israel on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.
Issac Newton, a famous Mason, drew the following blueprint:
–=–
Within our Masonic Bible, the first section is dedicated to the “Building of Solomon’s Temple”, with many references and indexes throughout the book referring to its building and rebuilding. In describing a painting, it states:
Scene and Location: On Mount Moriah, within the walls of Jerusalem.
Principal Characters: King Solomon; Hifam, king of Tyre; Hiram Abif.
Particular Event Or Occasion: King David, Solomon’s father and predecessor on the throne of Israel, was forbidden by the Lord to build a temple because he was a man of war and had shed blood. He was assured, however, that his son would build the temple and he was permitted to gather large sums of money and to make other preparations for its construction. Soon after his succession to the throne, Solomon planned to build the temple within a period of seven years.
Details Of The Picture: …Hiram, king of Tyre, had been an intimate friend of David for many years, and in an alliance with the king of Israel had prepared much of the material for the temple in the forests of Mount Lebanon and in the quarries of his country. Hirm Abif, a skilled workman in metal, stone, and wood, was the principal architect and engineer. He served as Master Mason and overseer in the building of the temple, supervising the labors of the best workmen that could be found.
–=–
The Masonic Red Letter Edition King James Bible then enters into a question and answer chapter, which is entitled:
“Questions and Answers Relating to Characters, Places, Words and Phrases Used in Symbolic Masonry“.
Here is a selection of some of those printed within:
–=–
Q. Hebrew Language: Why is it of the greatest importance in Free-masonry?
A. Because the alphabet and its numerical values is the key to the greater number of words employed in Masonry as well as the mysteries of the Bible.
Q: “Illuminate”: What does it signify?
A: The enlightened, and is used on Latin diplomas as an epithet of Freemasons.
Q: Adam: The meaning of the name of the first man.
A: Adam – derived from the Hebrew ADaMaH – the ground. From AdAm, to be red, relating to his complexion. As the Solar allegory, takes us back 4200 years B.C.
Q: Abraham: In what degree of Masonry is he impersonated?
A: Order of the High Priest (Excellent) represented by Joshua, the first High Priest of the Jews (Zechariah, 3, 1-9, Page 567)
Q: Constitutions: In which year was the first Book of Constitutions published?
A: 1723
–=–
Ahiman Rezon, written by Laurence Dermott in 1764,
was the Book of Constitutions for the Ancients Grand Lodge,
a ritual that is still in wide usage. The title was derived from
three Hebrew words, “ahim“, “manah“, and “raizon“.
What does the term Ahiman Rezon mean?
At different times it has been interpreted as:
A Help to a Brother; Faithful Brother Secretary; Will of Selected Brethren; Law of Prepared Brethren; Secrets of a Prepared Brother; Royal Builder;
and The Thoughts or Opinions of a True and Faithful Brother.
–=–
Q: Colors: What are the colors of Ancient Craft Masonry?
A: Religious guilds of the Church of Rome, Merchant guilds in the Livery Companies of London, Craft guilds as in the present day Trade Unions.
Q: Occasions (Four): Upon what occasions may the “Grand Honors” of Masonry be given?
A: When a “Masonic Hall” is to be consecrated: a “Master-Elect” to be installed: a “New Lodge” to be constituted; or a “Grand Master, or deputy to be received on an official visitation.”
Q: From what country was American Freemasonry derived?
A: England.
Q: Masonically, what may be said of the Boston Tea Party?
A: It had its installation in a Masonic Lodge Room, participating in the raid,all were Masons.
–=–
“Sponsered by the George Washington Masonic Stamp Club.”
–=–
Q: Was Masonry practiced in the Revolutionary Army?
A: Yes.
Q: Who was the first Master of Alexandria Lodge No. 22, Alexandria, Va.?
A: George Washington.
Q: What change was later made in the name of this Lodge?
A: Alexandria Washington Lodge No. 22, A.D. 1805.
Q: Did Washington follow the Masonic custom when he laid the cornerstone of the new Capitol building in 1793?
A: No. It was laid in the South East corner.
Q: Name five of the ten early Presidents of the United States who were Masons.
A: Washington, Monroe, Jackson, Polk, Buchanan.
Q: What distinguished French officer in the Revolutionary War was a Mason?
A: Marquis de Lfayette, who was made a Mason in an army Lodge at Valley Forge by Washington himself.
Q: Who presented Washington with an embroidered satin apron?
A: Madame Lafayette. The apron was conveyed by the Marquis from Paris to General Washington at Mt. Vernon. It is preserved by the Washington Benevolent Society at Philadelphia, and the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania. It is the most prized relic of Masonry in the U.S.A.
Q: Where was the first Masonic hall erected in America?
A: Philadelphia, A.D. 1734.
–=–
In the 1700s, J.J.C Bode wrote about the Masons in France, which were called the Philadelphes:
“We agreed… for France, we would adopt the name Philadelphes instead of Illuminati.”
In a document titled “Grand Lodge of the Philadelphes – General Statutes” dated 1861, a Communication issued from E. Benoit, the President of the Grand Lodge of Philadelphes in 1860 states:
“Moreover one must judge of a tree by its fruits. Well, can you mention within your vast Masonic empire a single Lodge that has produced such results? In the space of ten years, she has initiated above 300 profanes; she has founded Lodges in Belgium, Switzerland, England, as you well know, and America; and her children, indefatigable apostles of Masonry, have raised the first Masonic temple at Ballarat.”
–=–
Q: By what name were the Masons anciently known?
A: Long before the building of Solomon’s Temple, Masons were known as the “Sons of Light“.
It’s a Phoenix, not an Eagle!
–=–
“Like its Patron Order – Free Masonry – The Order of the Eastern Star inculcates and promotes the principles of loyalty to one’s country, and of obedience to civil law. Its tenets enforce the fundamentals of freedom, equal rights and liberties to all, and the extension of these privileges to all the peoples of the earth. It undertakes to prepare the women of this age for the righteous performances of their enlarged civil and political privileges which have been given to them through the influence of Christianity. It teaches its members of every race and nationality to honor the flag of their native land.”
–=–
Pay attention to my right hand…
while my left hand points to the American flag with its stars upside down.
–=–
Q: Masonry: The probable antiquity?
A: It is admitted that Masonry is descended from the Ancient Mysteries. These were first arranged when the constellation Leo was at the Summer Solstice. The solar allegory proves this a fact, and would take us back to 4200 years B.C. Thus the Antiquity of Masonry is written in the starry heavens.
Q: Moses: Who is he?
A: The lawgiver of the Jews who plays an important part in the Holy Royal Arch of the American York Rite.
Q: What is the meaning of the name Moses?
A: It is derived from two Hebrew words “Moce” and “oushes” signifies “saved from the water“.
Q: Lodge of St. John: What is it?
A: Masonic tradition says this was the primitive Mother Lodge, held at Jerusalem, dedicated to St. John the Baptist, and then to St. John the evangelist, and finally to both, called “The Lodge of the Holy Sts. John of Jerusalem, and from this Lodge, all other Lodges descended.”
Q: Origins: What is the 12 generally accepted origins of Masonry?
A: Patriarchal Religion, Ancient Mysteries, Temple of Solomon, To the Crusaders, To the Knights Templars, to the Roman Colleges of Artificers, To the Operative Masons of the Middle Ages, To the Rosicrucians, To Oliver Cromwell for political reasons, To the Pretender for the restoration of the House of Stuart, to the British throne, to Sir Christopher Wren, to Dr Desaguliers and others in 1717.
Dr. John Theophilus Desaguliers
member of the Royal Society of London
beginning 29 July 1714.
Experimental assistant to Mason Sir Isaac Newton Third Grand Master in 1719, and Deputy Grand Master in 1723
and 1725 of the Premier Grand Lodge of England
–=–
Q: Triangular Chain: What is the legend of the triangular chain?
A: When the Jewish Masons were led in captivity from Jerusalem to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar, they were bound by triangular chains, as an insult, because, to them the triangle was a symbol of Deity, to be made use of only on sacred occasions.
The Double triangle
The Star of David? Or is there more to this symbol?
Solomon’s Seal
Solomon’s Seal at Lion’s Gate, Old Jerusalem wall
Rosicrucian Museum, San Jose, California
Hexagram and Rose Cross, Rosicrucian Museum, San Jose, California
The Rosy Cross (Rose Cross and Rose Croix) Symbol of Christian Rosenkreuz,
Qabbalist and alchemist and founder of the Rosicrucian Order.
–=–
From “History & Doctrines of the Rose-Croix” by Paul Sedir, we get a description of the Rose Cross as “one of the manifestations of the Providence of God.”:
“But the Earth is constitutionally incapable of conserving the gift which God has given it for long without deforming it; man has the power to stray from the road which had been drawn out for him. Then Divine Mercy sends beings who bring hope; or an exemplar who comes among men to play the role fulfilled by the comets in the cosmos. Such is the function of secret societies; such is the mission of the messengers of the Absolute, notably the Rose-Croix.”
On page 23, Sedir explains the 8-symbol “Rose”:
“After triangular emblems, the seal of Brahatma and the triangle of the holy syllable, the most ancient Masonic emblem which the ancient priesthood has bequeathed is that of the Rose-Croix… This rose was placed in the center of a cross, because the latter expressed to them the idea of rectitude and infinity; of rectitude, by the intersection of its lines at a right angle and of infinity, because these lines can be extended to infinity and that, by a rotation made by the thought about the verticle line, they represent the triple senses of hight, breadth and depth.”
Freemasons = The Sons Of Light
–=–
5-pointed star?
The Lesser Key of Solomon.
Crescent and six pointed Star from the seal of the
Jewish Community of Regensburg, Germany, Middle ages
Solomon’s Seal opposite the entrance to the Rockefeller Museum
formerly the Palestine Archaeological Museum, in East Jerusalem
Solomon’s Seal by the “New Gate” in wall surrounding Old Jerusalem
Solomon’s Seal in Jaffa Gate of Old Jerusalem wall,
also called “Gate of the Prayer Niche of David”; also David’s Gate
Door Knocker on Jewish home in Haifa
Arab Star of David
Contemporary Crescent and six pointed Star in the old City of Jerusalem.
In Arabic this crescent emblem is called hilal.
–=–
The origin of the now famous Islamic symbol of the five pointed star and the crescent was not Islamic but Sassanian, and at first it had six points on the star. The five pointed star and the crescent actually became a symbol of Islam only during the 19th century, placed on the Ottoman flag from 1793. It entered the Turkish Flag in 1923 and then was adopted by other Muslim countries.
The ancient Crescent and six pointed Star also appear on a Roman Denarius minted by Augustus (27 BC-CE 14):
The Sassanid Empire was founded by Ardashir I, after the fall of the Arsacid Empire and the defeat of the last Arsacid king, Artabanus V. According to the Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania, “at its largest point in the seventh century the Sassanid Empire included territory in contemporary Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Oman, Israel, Lebanon, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Turkey, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and parts of Kazakhstan, Pakistan, India, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Libya, Kyrgyzstan. and Tajikistan.” It was the last pre-Islamic Persian Empire, ruled by the Sasanian Dynasty from 224 CE to 651 CE. The Sassanid Empire, which succeeded the Parthian Empire, was recognized as one of the main powers in Western and Central Asia, alongside the Roman-Byzantine Empire, for a period of more than 400 years.
Michael G. Morony, in his book Iraq After the Muslim Conquest (p. 40) states that the star and the crescent were combined for the first time on coins of Khosrau I the twentieth Sassanid Emperor (also called Chosroes I, and Anushirvan (r. 531–579). Hurmizd IV replaced the six pointed star in some of his coins with a five pointed star. This tradition continued on coins of the seventh century. After the conquest of Iraq the Muslim Government accepted these coins as well. This tradition lasted until 695 or 696, when coins were minted without any images.
The Mormon Church Assembly Hall at Temple Square, Salt Lake City
Mormon sun worship of light bearers
Notice the 6 pointed stars above the 5 pointed stars
suggesting the geometrical universe of unity and duality
Mormon ceremonial apron
Mormon Church History Building, Salt Lake City
The Mormon “Moon Stones”.
Religions can’t have the male morning star
without the female crescent moon.
Amiens Cathedral, north window, France
St. Mary’s Church, Adderbury
What a lovely snake…
Alistair Crowley
Also known as the “Great Beast 666”
Notice the triangle light rays are in the form of the Seal of Solomon.
Both the 5 and 6 pointed star are revealed here.
Notice here the symbol of two snakes used in
the modern “practice” of the craft of medicine.
Both attorney’s and doctors practice in their craft monopolies.
The Book Of Shadows
Madonna at the Super Bowl – The symbols mean the same thing and
have the same ancient origin. This is no concert. it is a ritual ceremony…
A ceremony to usher in the coming of the merged New World Religion,
including the rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple.
Yeah, she’s a very revealing, classy broad
Terry Richardson – The Star is universal in sacred geometry, as seen below
The Pentagram fits within the star…
the star within the pentagram, ad infinity.
Masonry revolves around Sacred Geometry.
The image of a geometrically perfect star goes on forever,
alternating between upside-down and right-side up.
Ameth is Hebrew for truth.
The Sigil of Dei Ameth (Sigillum Dei Ameth) is used as a Seal of the truth of God.
Washington D.C.
The Oval Office of the White House
As the president enters, he walks under the Sacred Masonic Arch.
Under the arch, a single Fasce hovers over the doorway,
as the rays of the sun shine out from the carpet’s great seal.
The desk – an empty workspace…
for this office is but a staged museum.
–=–
“Whereas the Founding Fathers of this great Nation
and signers of the Constitution, most of whom were Freemasons,
provided a well-rounded basis for developing themselves
and others into valuable citizens of the United States…”
–House Resolution #33, 110th Congress
–=–
The Pentagon in Washington D.C. is a symbol of the 33 degrees of masonry.
Its angles are even at 33 degrees, creating a pentagram with a pentagram in the center.
Designed by John Whiteside Parsons, high priest in the Ordo Templi Orientis, also called the ‘Order of the Temple of the East’ or ‘Order of Oriental Templars’.
See Eastern Star symbol above, the women’s sect of Masonry.
The mystery of Pentalpha (Pythagarium)
Osiris Pentalpha Lodge #23
The two flags of Masonry
Why is the sacred Seal of Solomon designed with stars on the dollar bill?
Or did you even notice?
Darpa’s actual logo
–=–
“The Freemasons of the United States have, by tacit consent,
referred to it (the pentagram) as a symbol of the Five Points of Fellowship.
The outlines of the five pointed star are the same as those of the pentalpha or Pythagoras”
—Encyclopedia of Freemasonry: Page 358
–=–
-Excerpt-
“William Preston, the eminent Masonic student, scholar, writer, who lived and wrote in the latter part of the eighteenth century, conceived the idea of making the degrees in general, and the Fellowcraft degree in particular, a liberal education! A ‘liberal education’ in those days was comprised within what we still call, after Preston, the ‘seven liberal arts and sciences.’ In those days any mathematics beyond geometry was only for the very, very few.Indeed, mathematics were looked upon as beingsomething not meant for the common men, as being of small use in the world, save for engineers and designers and measurers of land…
Below is a quote that is 1800 years old.
“…let one of these be that art which prepares the body to be subservient, as a prompt and robust vehicle, to the mandates of the soul, and which is denominated gymnastic. Let another art be that which is the angel of the conceptions of the soul, and which is called rhetoric; another, that which is the nurse and tutor of the juvenile mind, and which is denominated poetry; another that which is the leader of the nature of numbers, and which is called arithmetic; and another that which is the teacher of computation, and is called logistic. Let geometry, also, and music follow, who are the associates of philosophy and conscious of her arcana, and to each of which she distributes a portion of her labour.” —Maximus Tyrius (circa 200 CE) “Dissertation”, xxi, translated by Thomas Taylor(1758-1835)
These differ little from those delineated in later times and would still have great implications when applied in today’s modern world.
H.P.H. Bromwell (1823 -1903) wrote in his massive tome Restorations of Masonic Geometry and Symbolry that: “Although the number of recognized sciences far exceeds seven, yet, giving to that number the benefit of its symbolic meaning, it stands for the whole circle of sciences, whether specifically named among the seven or not.”
We usually associate the seven liberal arts to medieval education curriculum, at this time in Masonic circles the only education available may I suggest that an educated member of a lodge was more useful especially if he could apply geometry to his work….
The 47Th proposition of the first book of Euclid.
The Pythagorean Theorem states that for any right triangle the sum of the squares of its two legs equals the square of its hypotenuse (a2 + b2 = c2). Or we could frame it as the sum of the square of the horizontal and the square of the perpendicular equals the square of the hypotenuse. This is what became known as Euclid’s 47 Proposition… We also know this formulation was known before Pythagoras – there is evidence in ancient Egyptian work, ancient China (the Chou Pei manuscript), and the megalith builders… This theory, commonly known as the “Pythagorean theorem,” shows that the sum of the squares of the legs of a right triangle is equal to the squares of the hypotenuse or (A X 2) + (B X 2) = (C X 2)… Regardless, it is attributed to Pythagoras and two hundred years later Euclid compiled his “Elements of Mathematics” where this particular 47Th proposition is found in Book One… This theorem has been called the root of all geometry and the cornerstone of mathematics. The practical applications alone are worthy of the high esteem that Masonry affords it. And this is the interpretation of the lecture that is most considered when masons speak of it but the meaning of this hieroglyphical emblem does not stop there… The emblem we are usually presented is the 3,4,5 right triangle in this fashion: The vertical line is of 3 units, the horizontal is of 4 units, and the hypotenuse is of 5 units. Not only is our attention called to this geometrical figure in the Master Mason degree, it is also prominent in the Scottish Rite in the 20th Degree – Master of the Symbolic Lodge and in the 25th Degree – Knight of the Brazen Serpent… Geometry treats of the powers and properties of magnitudes in general, where length, breath, and thickness, are considered, from a point to a line, from a line to a superficies (surface of a body), and from a superficies to a solid… By this science, the architect is enabled to construct his plans, and execute his designs; the general to arrange his soldiers; the engineer to mark out ground for encampments; the geographer to give us the dimensions of the World, and all things within, to delineate the extent of seas, and specify the divisions of empires, kingdoms and provinces; by it, also, the astronomer is enabled to make his observations, and to fix the duration of times and seasons, years and cycles. In fine, geometry is the foundation of architecture, and the root of mathematics.”
—“Geometry And Masonry: Sacred Geometry”, by Brother Harvey Lovewell, Lodge Millaa Millaa #351, United Grnd Lodge of Queensland, Au.
-End Excerpt-
For more information on the importance of the ancient liberal arts in education and how it has been purposefully perverted and usurped by today’s “general arts” education for the dumbed down common people, please visit Jan Irvin’s website at:
Pay special attention to the “fallacy” links. Learn them and avoid
this most sacred tool of illicit word trickery by the law society – the logical fallacy.
–=–
With the study of Pythagarium, the true building blocks of nature begin to emerge through this sacred geometry, including the Golden Mean (Golden ratio), the Fibionachi series, the Divine Proportion, etc…
This is the beauty and sacred math in all life on Earth.
This is the mathematical perfection of nature.
Some say it is Sacred Geometry.
Some say it’s God.
–=– The Owl, The Bull, The God –=–
Eliphas Levi, a nineteenth-century satanist whose works inspired the writings of Albert Pike, the Sovereign Grand Commander of international Freemasonry. Levi enthusiastically reports: The pentagram with two horns in the ascendant represents Satan, or the goat of the Sabbath. (The horn) downward naturally represents the demon, that is, intellectual subversion, disorder and folly. Esoterically, the star symbolizes man as deity, as the universe embodied. It also stands for Sirius, the “Dog Star” or planet where Satan dwells. It stands for “Thor”, the ancient Nordic God, and it stands for Baal, or Bel, the demonic God so often mentioned in derisive terms in the Old Testament. This same star God was worshiped in Egypt, and the children of Israel, while wandering in the desert, fell under his hypnotic powers. They called him Moloch, Chiun, and Remphan. The prophet Amos castigated the Jewish idolaters for this unholy sacrilege: But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your God, which ye made to yourselves…
Reportedly hanging out on the dollar bill,
Molech is portrayed as the (feminine) owl is hiding in plain sight. I can neither confirm or deny that this is actually an owl.
However, this short video is helpful in that determination:
But this is the least of our worries regarding Moloch worship…
For Molech was and still is worshiped in the church and state Temples.
A press club in government (Washington D.C.)? An owl (Molech),
Aladdin’s Lamp, and emanating sun rays upon its “seal”?
Bohemian Grove, the origin of the National Press Club.
“Originally a Canaanite god to whom human sacrifices were offered.”
“Later, he was a general symbol of authorities that corrupt
or destroy humans, especially inhuman political systems”
—The Continuum Encyclopedia of Symbols (2000 Edition),Udo Becker: –
–=–
Moloch (מלך m-l-k, “king”) is the name of an ancient Ammonite god. Moloch worship was practiced by the Canaanites, Phoenicians, other North African cultures and the Levant (Arabic: بلاد الشام Bilād ash-Shām or المشرق العربي al-Mashrīq al-‘Arabiyy; Hebrew: כְּנָעַן Kənáʿan). It involved child sacrafice by the parents of said children by fire as payment to the idol statue. In the Old Testament, Gehenna was a valley by Jerusalem, where apostate Israelites and followers of various Baalim and Caananite gods, including Moloch, sacrificed their children by fire (2 Chr. 28:3, 33:6; Jer. 7:31, 19:2–6).
–=–
“And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Moloch”.
–Leviticus 18:21
–=–
“Then did Solomon build a high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab,
in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and lmlk, the abomination of the Sons of Ammon.”
–1 Kings 11:7
–=–
“Moreover he burnt incense in the valley of the son of Hinnom,
and burnt his children in the fire, after the abominations of the heathen
whom the LORD had cast out before the children of Israel.”
–2 Chronicles 28:3
–=–
“But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images,
the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves.“
-Amos 5:26 (KJB)
–=–
“Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Remphan,
figures which ye made to worship them: and I will carry you away beyond Babylon.”
–Acts 7:43
–=–
The Tabernacle (Hebrew: משכן, mishkan, meaning “residence”, “house”, or “dwelling place”), according to the Hebrew Bible, was the portable dwelling place for the divine presence from the time of the Exodus from Egypt through the conquering of the land of Canaan. Built to specifications revealed by God (Yahweh) to Moses at Mount Sinai, it accompanied the Israelites on their wanderings in the wilderness and their conquest of the Promised Land. The First Temple (of Solomon) in Jerusalem superseded it as the dwelling-place of God. There is no mention of the Tabernacle in the Tanakh after the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple by the Babylonians in 587 BCE.
The fullest description of the Tabernacle describes an inner shrine (named Holy of Holies) housing the Ark of the Covenant and an outer chamber (Holy Place) with a golden lampstand (for the menorah), table for showbread (Bread of Presence – cakes or loaves of bread which were always present on a specially dedicated table in the Temple of Jerusalem as an offering to “God”), and an alter of incense. Many scholars contend that the description reflects the structure of the Temple of Solomon, while some hold that the description derives from memories of a real pre-monarchic shrine, perhaps the sanctuary at Shiloh. Traditional scholars contend that it describes an actual tabernacle used in the time of Moses and thereafter.
Depiction of the Menorah on the Arch of Titus in Rome,
being carried with the portable Tabernacle (Divine Presence of God).
–=–
“Again, you shall say to the Sons of Israel: Whoever he be of the Sons of Israel or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that gives any of his seed l’Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones. And I will set my face against that man and will cut him off from among his people; because he has given of his seed l’Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name. And if the people of the land do at all hide their eyes from that man, when he gives of his seed l’Molech, and do not kill him, then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go astray after him, whoring l’Molech from among the people.”
–Leviticus 20:2-5
–=–
“And he defiled the Tophet, which is in the valley of Ben-hinnom,
that no man might make his son or his daughter pass through the fire l’Molech.”
–2 Kings 23:10
–=–
“And they built the high places of the Ba‘al, which are in the valley of Ben-hinnom,
to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire l’Molech;
which I did not command them, nor did it come into my mind
that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin.”
–Jeremiah 32:35
–=–
It is ironic that the Bible is deemed extremely violent in such chapters as Leviticus, turning many away from its lessons and warnings. And yet, such violence stems from literally destroying those who would worship Satan and sacrifice children to him and other deities in the tabernacles, idols, and in the Temples of Solomon. And today, as the Temple is being planned and rebuilt and as the laws are changed to allow animal “sacrifice” in the Temple, as World War 3 is being spoken about openly as a racially cloaked religious war, these violent pages in the Bible are completely lost on the population of today as they head into the new age without knowledge and without the dignity to fight this ancient foe. This is the regression of humanity into the darkest of new ages…
And I honestly wonder how many parents out there would say no to human sacrifice – and how many would defend their children to the death? I honestly fear not nearly enough.
The 12th-century Rashi, commenting on Jeremiah 7:31, stated:
“Tophet is Moloch, which was made of brass; and they heated him from his lower parts; and his hands being stretched out, and made hot, they put the child between his hands, and it was burnt; when it vehemently cried out; but the priests beat a drum, that the father might not hear the voice of his son, and his heart might not be moved.”
A rabbinical tradition attributed to the Yalkout of Rabbi Simeon, explains that the idol was hollow and was divided into seven compartments, in one of which they put flour, in the second turtle-doves, in the third a ewe, in the fourth a ram, in the fifth a calf, in the sixth an ox, and in the seventh a child, which were all burned together by heating the statue inside.
Molech is rarely depicted as an owl, which represents the feminine aspect of the god. It’s dominant male persona is generally the bull-headed man.
–=–
A father sacrificing his own son…
(“Der Götze Moloch” i.e. The Idol Moloch).
An 18th-century German illustration of Moloch
with sacrificial ovens built in.
The Flight of Moloch, watercolour, 1809.
Illustration by William Blake for John Milton’s
poem entitled: “On The Morning Of Christ’s Nativity“
In Milton’s “Nativity” poem, Molech is listed among the chiefs of Satan’s fallen angels in Book I, and is given a speech at the parliament of Hell in Book 2:43 – 105, where he argues for immediate warfare against God. He later becomes revered as a pagan god on Earth.
–=–
Baphomet – male and female,
sun and moon Other male/female dualities in gods,
a balancing of the generative energies.
Map of the location of the Capital Building (Legislature) in Washington D.C.
The “Congress Building” literally sits inside the belly of the god (beast) Molech.
George Bush Jr. – the greatest bloodline pretender, ever
–=–
“I tell people all the time, you’re equally American if you’re a Christian, Jew, or Muslim.
You’re equally American if you believe in an Almighty or
don’t believe in an Almighty. That’s a sacred freedom.”
–George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Mar. 10, 2006
–=–
“I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn’t do my job.”
–George W. Bush, during acampaign visit to Amish community,
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, Jul. 9, 2004
–=–
“I couldn’t imagine somebody like Osama bin Laden
understanding the joy of Hanukkah.”
–George W. Bush, White House, Dec. 10, 2007.
–=–
“We have a calling from beyond the stars to stand for freedom,
and America will always be faithful to that cause.”
–George W. Bush,Washington, D.C., Jan. 19, 2005
–=–
“All of you — all in this generation of our military —
have taken up the highest calling of history.
You’re defending your country, and protecting the innocent from harm.
And wherever you go, you carry a message of hope — a message that is ancient and ever new. In the words of the prophet Isaiah,
“To the captives, ‘come out,’ — and to those in darkness, ‘be free’. “
–George W. Bush, Aboard the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln,
a couple of miles away from San Diego May 1, 2003
–=– More Answers Revealed –=–
Q: Lodge: When is it said to be Just?
A: When furnished with the Great Lights.
Q: Lodge: When is it said to be Perfect?
A: When it contains the constitutional numbers of members.
Q: Lodge: When is it said to be Regular?
A: When working under Charter, legally authorized.
Q: Lodges of the World: What is the connecting bond between them?
A: Lawful Authority. No Lodge can exist and work without authority.
Q: Solar metal: What is it?
A: Gold.
The Goyim can be made to covet anything.
For gold is the destroyer of nations and men…
Q: Freemasonry: What is the earliest mention made of it?
A: John Moore came from England to South Carolina in 1680. A letter written by him in 1715 says he spent a few evenings with Masonic Brothers.
Q: Who were Modern Masons?
A: Supporters of the Grand Lodge of England.
Q: Who were Ancient Masons?
A: The Irish Masons who formed a rival Grand Lodge in London.
Q: Were these rival Grand Lodges represented in America?
A: Yes. The Ancients became popular and organized in Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, South Carolina, where they worked as “Ancient York Lodges.”
Q: What effect did they have on American Masonry?
A: Dissensions arose between the Ancients and Moderns.
Q: What year was a reconciliation effected between the two Grand Lodges in England?
A: 1813.
Q: Was a similar union consummated in America?
A: Yes. The two Grand Lodges of South Carolina were the last Grand Lodges to unite in 1817 and the distinction between Ancients and Moderns was abolished.
Q: What was the attitude of the Colonial Lodges toward the Revolution?
A: The Ancients favored the Colonies. The Moderns, the Crown.
Q: What State adheres to the Ancients?
A: Pennsylvania.
Q: What State has the greatest number of Lodges?
A: Texas.
Q: Washington: Did he ever hold the office of Grand Master?
A: While the army for independence was encamped at winter quarters (1779) in Morristown, New Jersey, he was unanimously elected the Grand Master of Masons of the American Colonies but due to the war and the upset conditions at the time he never did serve, but in the hearts of American Masons he was considered the first and only Grand Master of American Freemasons, and was at that time considered the most eminent Mason of his time, evidenced by the unanimous vote cast for him to become Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of American Freemasons.
–=– Fin –=–
This brings us to the end of part 2 of this essay series. In my final writing, we will read over the constitution with a fine-toothed comb, removing any semblance of rose-colored glasses, and tear that compact apart, article by article, right by right. The theocracy is now come out into the open; a Masonic guild of ecclesiastical law and enforcement ruled by blood. And this journey is nearing its end. The question is, what are you going to do with this knowledge now?
For the truth and only the truth can indeed set you free.
And hope is all that stands in the way of action.
All ye who enter here abandon hope, for without it, ye are a reckoning force. With it, ye are as a docile lamb at the slaughter.
.
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, August 13th, 2013
–=– CRACKING THE CULT OF THE CONSTITUTION
A three-part essay by: Clint Richardson –=–
Introduction: The following essay series will be very challenging and controversial for all who read. It is not that the information itself is actually controversial. Instead, the difficulty for most readers is in searching the soul and personally recognizing that the true controversy lies within the individual; a battle of cognitive dissonance where the ego continuously clashes with the true and reasonable self – the natural being grasping for truth. It is a fight between our indoctrinated beliefs and the hard facts and realities that challenge them, causing emotional barriers and fallacy which unhappily overcome comprehension, logic, and reason.
Presented below and in two future parts are facts and images that will challenge the very core of your belief system, from religion to politics, and most importantly to the very founding of this illusion we call the nation and constitution of the United States. For those who have eyes to see, I present this three-part chronicle and true history of the hidden hand that rules through blood, word magic, trickery and deceit – the elicit and eminent powers that be.
Part 1, entitled “Laying The Cornerstone”, covers recent history and the current state of the constitution of the United States, its congressional suspension according to legislative decree, and the powers of the Executive Branch totally outside of and over that constitution through declared national emergency and military rule, as approved by congress (the People) and under the “Lieber Code”. Believing that the constitution still applies as a restriction to government is the greatest hurdle for us to overcome, for this blinding belief blurs reality. The greatest elicit word trickery of the constitution was to make its unconstitutional use constitutional – to exempt government from the law. The question of whether or not this was and is a Christian nation founded by Christian men will also be questioned, as well as the theocratic nature of that Masonic municipal temple called Washington D.C. And the word “oath” will be exposed for what it truly is – a religious pledge to artificial corporate things and never to the actual living people (citizens) of the nation.
Part 2, entitled “Squaring Our History“, will further reveal the ancient Masonic rite of the sacred mystery religions, explore further the oath (holy sacrament), and look at many of the “constitutions” that through the church Masonry has created in the past. Why are certain words capitalized in the constitution? The answer is obvious once this Masonic writing style is examined. We will continue with a shocking and astounding pictorial history that showcases what has been the true power of all governments for thousands of years; never of or actually by the consent of the governed people, but of the Masonic Deistic Rite and its self-declared divine bloodline right to rule. The signs and symbols are everywhere, right before your very eyes, and yet you’ve likely never noticed them before. With a new understanding of just what authority is and where such “eminence” comes from, you will never look at government or its “ecclesiastical” civil doctrine the same.
Part 3, entitled “Compassing The Constitution“, will be a thorough walk-through of the Masonic legal writings of that non-Christian document without the benefit of emotion, false belief, or rose colored glasses – exposing the many fallacies that have become belief in America: the religion-based cult-ure of the constitution. As if reading the constitution for the first time, its true nature and meaning is revealed for the Masonic document it is, leaving no word undefined. And finally with this understanding the question is posed: Would you really sign and be bound by the constitution if it were a private contract?
–=–
In this first chapter, we will barely be scraping the surface of the hidden hand that rules. Instead, we must disseminate the legal foundation of the United States through defined words and statutes. And only when we understand our current state of government and its blatantly mandated congressional suspension of the constitution before most of us were even born can we then look back to see this was the Masonic plan all along – the true purpose of the founding of the United States.
Please be aware that the concepts of God, gods, the Bible, corporate churches, and the doctrines of religious and other “societies” will be discussed in this presentation. I do not offer my own religious opinion here, and instead only attempt to logically and reasonably decipher how religions are used to righteously and more importantly violently govern the people. In other words, I will be committing the cardinal sin of asking questions – of challenging the rite and the right of the church’s dogma to govern the people, including the Deistic Masonic empire of the Untied States. Each person who reads this will have different levels of understandings, beliefs, emotions, and knowledge about these subjects. They are included herein not for the purposes of debate or persuasion of faith or doctrine, but because they are and always have been the foundation of all governments in world history, including the United States, where the “sovereign” Rulers, Kings, Queens and Officials derive their powers and authority from some form of church and its doctrine, claiming to act as or by whatever god they invoke as the “anointed” head of that church. For the purposes of this essay, your personal belief and faith or lack of it is irrelevant to the context of what is disclosed, for knowledge needs not belief. And clearly religion and the institution of the corporate church cannot be ignored in the history of all past and powerful world governments. It is the true hidden beliefs and faith of those who claim god-like powers in church and state we are to be concerned with here, not your own. The fallacious comparison of the “people” as members of the church or nation has nothing to do with the leadership positions of power and authority within those corporate entities – who claim governmental authority over those members (the people) through “god”. Instead of these doctrine and faith-based hangups, I disclaim here that for the purposes of this presentation, the word God (as capitalized) should be translated to mean the word nature, for God would be the creator of everything in nature if He indeed exists. With this understanding, we can easily see and prove that government is diametrically opposed to nature, natural law, and especially the natural rights of the natural people; and thus by default is actually opposed to God and God’s laws of nature.
Somewhere along the line, be it purposeful or not, a fundamental misunderstanding was promoted by the corporate religious doctrines of government that places mankind above God’s nature and natural law as its dominatrix with an irresponsible domination (dominion) over the earth, as opposed to acting as its steward and caretaker; giving rise to the entire religious corporate machine that violates nature at every turn; pumping dry its blood, tainting its life-affirming waters with pollution and poison, disrespecting and incrementally obliterating most of its lifeforms, and altering its function and landscape to the point that said “Creator” would not today recognize His own creation. This promoted doctrine of those who care more for the after-life than for theirs and others (the people’s) natural life here on Earth makes the church a poor candidate to govern the earth we all live upon and depend on for our natural lives, rights, and delicate balance of resources.
Thus the readers ego and righteousness, if possible, should be laid aside before continuing for the purposes of absorbing knowledge – so as to see the world without filters…
For those who would prematurely dismiss the absolute domination and importance of religion (the church) and Ecclesiastical law within our United States government, or for that matter any and all governments around the world, you of all people should read the following information, which proves that this Ecclesiastical legal doctrine is the only governmental law that actually exists. For your belief or non-belief matters about zero percent as to what is the foundation and “authority” of law.
I recommend, due to the length and importance of the following information, images, and future parts, that you copy and paste this essay for safe keeping. This is a free, un-copyrighted, educational endeavor that may be shared and re-posted for educational purposes. Please feel free to turn it into a (free/non-profit) documentary movie or other alternative media venture. No permission is needed from myself.
–Clint Richardson
———————————————————————————– Part 1: Laying The Cornerstone ———————————————————————————–
–=–
“Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave.”
–Frederick Douglass–
–=–
I believe the above quote to be a self-evident truth…
Inversely, I find it self-evident that belief is the opposite of knowledge, and that some slaves believe themselves to be free – a people indentured and destroyed by nothing more or less than their lack of knowledge mixed with a belief in government-granted liberty as the source of their God-given natural rights.
Unfortunately it seems that most “citizens” in the United States have no knowledge of their own place in this indentured society, or that they are unilaterally indebted to it. Most minds are harvested before they can read or write into de facto (illegitimate) contractual servitude called “citizenship” to the United States – a compact entered into before the age of reason and consent – reenforced via adult “Selective Service” registration as government cannon fodder and chattel at the whim of a president’s pen. And America sits as a lady in waiting, plastered over in ink on paper; a land hidden by corporatism.
Meanwhile, a plague of manufactured history is spread over the true nature and founding of that United States central government; a false, fabled paradigm inbred and instilled from birth and throughout the education system, sponsored and even required by the very government who wishes to keep its true disposition a secret.
It is the purpose of this multi-part research project to show conclusively the true hidden foundation (Cornerstone) of the United States, who the “People, inOrder” of so-called “Founding Fathers” really were, and exactly what the “constitution” is. For all we have learned is nothing if not the provided doctrine and entertainment of a ruling class in that government that absolutely depends on the non-dissemination of the nation’s true history and origin.
Enter-tain-ment is defined from its Latin origins as “to enter(enter) and hold(tain) the mind(mentis)”.
And the word govern-ment?
–=–
“Wars in old times were made to get slaves.
The modern implement of imposing slavery is debt.”
–Ezra Pound
–=–
Today, the entire world has been enslaved by imposed government (public) debt, a requirement of “citizens” in the many international debt-slave colonies called “countries”.
It is imperative to comprehend what the “founding fathers” that created this govern-ment via their constitution believed through their own writings and associations, not your own. For it was their belief system and their “Fraternal Brotherhood” of Freemasonry that created this union, not yours. They were “the People” (capitalized in the constitution as a proper noun), not you and I as “the common people”.
I realize that this is a bold statement; and thanks to entertainment and history (His – Story), one worth reasonable doubt until proven. This goal is the purpose of the following information and the very long journey that led me here to piece it all together.
Today I challenge the great American fallacy called patriotism that governs the minds of the controlled citizenry. I challenge the very nature of this central government and its right to claim religious eminence and dominion over an otherwise free people. I challenge its Army, its Navy, its Air Force, its Marines, and its Maritime international corporate flag. I challenge its FBI, its CIA, its IRS, and all of its de facto (illegitimate) Executive Cabinet departments (none of which are elected by the American people) that, through Executive military authority (permission) supposedly granted by the very people for whom it enslaves, enforces the laws created by that government. And I challenge the certainly unfounded belief by the masses of people who live under that power of authority supposedly granted by the constitution of the United States to give license to that government the authority (permission) to hold, harm, extort, rape, and kill any man, woman, or child, both foreign and domestic. For a piece of paper has not a human mind or voice to grant anything.
–=–
Nationalism is the propagandist key to maintain govern-ment.
Enter-tain-ment is essential to hide the reality of govern-ment
and to promote the fallacy of Nationalism.
–=–
Without faithful believers in its legitimacy, any cult must surely perish…
And without voluntary citizens as military soldiers, government’s legal codes and authority diminish absent that violent force of blind obedience to back up forcefully its necessarily tyrannical laws. For law is only as corrupt as the men who have license to practice and especially enforce that law, those who do so under the guise of God’s name – IN GOD WE TRUST. Of course, it goes without saying that government wishes its ground troops to be as void of knowledge as possible, snatching their enlisted straight out of low income high schools – paying for their indoctrination within its own universities – an education system purposefully dumbed down and lacking true knowledge and independence so as to create such potential unthinking soldiers without knowledge, opportunity, or choice.
And so today I seek to lift your own veil, if you will permit the revolution of your mind over its righteous state of enshrined belief. For it is my intent to break the people of America free from this mindless, self-destructive Cult of the Constitution.
–=– Patriotism: The Arrogance Of Ignorance –=–
In America, our distorted history makes our people literally worship the United States Flag (a slightly altered corporate symbol of the former East India Company) while turning their backs on the natural lands of America. The people then thoughtlessly Pledge Allegiance to that corporate flag by reciting a poem written by a proclaimed socialist. Many even attend sports games in Roman style coliseums and, with no understanding of the origins of their hand over heart gesture, sing a nationalist praise before every game to the flag of the tyrannical govern-ment that enslaves them through debt contract.
As our first example of how the absolutely fictitious national beliefs by the people have created a mass cultural psychosis of fallacy within our American culture (cult-ure), due simply to a lack of historical knowledge, lets examine the true origins of this supposed American classic…
Have you ever asked yourself: Why do I pledge allegiance, and to what exactly do I blindly pledge it?
Does an inanimate object (idol) such as a Flag really need or care about your devotion to it?
Perhaps it’s time to uncover and expose this history…
American Flag vs. British East India Company Flag
–=–
“Music written by Brother John Stafford Smith (1750-1836) of Inverness Lodge #4 in London was, at one time, used by an Irish Masonic Orphans’ Home as their song. Later it became a popular drinking song for many years known as To Anacreon in Heaven. Then, some years later, the music was adopted by Francis Scott Key to which he wrote the words to our National Anthem, The Star Spangled Banner.”
–‘The Truth is Stranger than Fiction’, by Alphonse Cerza,
Masonic Service Association, 1967.
–=–
Anacreon singing his poetry
Anacreon (Greek: Ἀνακρέων, gen.: Ἀνακρέοντος) (582 BC – 485 BC)
a Greek lyric poet, notable for his drinking songs and hymns.
Later Greeks included him in the canonical list of nine lyric poets.
–=–
The original Pledge of Allegiance printed in the “Official Programme” circa 1892 **Notice here the capitalized words “Flag, Republic, Nation, Liberty, and Justice”. This is the classic Masonic writing style (capitalization). More on this in Part 2.
Below we see the incremental stage between the change over to a hand over heart gesture… It is actually quite humorous to be conditioned to actually think that placing our hand over our heart is any less significant or strange than placing our stiff-arms in the air, communist-style.
And then there are the unfounded beliefs:
Compared to the true knowledge:
–=– Pledge, Or Else… –=–
In the case of West Virginia State Board Of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), we read that this pledge of stiff-armed allegiance was not simply a choice by our children, but instead a requirement punishable by expulsion from the school system for “insubordination” in true communist fashion:
“The Board of Education on January 9, 1942, adopted a resolution containing recitals taken largely from the Court’s Gobitis opinion and ordering that the salute to the flag become ‘a regular part of the program of activities in the public schools,’ that all teachers and pupils ‘shall be required to participate in the salute honoring the Nation represented by the Flag; provided, however, that refusal to salute the Flag be regarded as an Act of insubordination, and shall be dealt with accordingly.’ [319 U.S. 624, 627] The resolution originally required the ‘commonly accepted salute to the Flag‘ which it defined. Objections to the salute as ‘being too much like Hitler’s’ were raised by the Parent and Teachers Association, the Boy and Girl [319 U.S. 624, 628] Scouts, the Red Cross, and the Federation of Women’s Clubs. Some modification appears to have been made in deference to these objections, but no concession was made to Jehovah’s Witnesses. What is now required is the ‘stiff-arm’ salute, the saluter to keep the right hand raised with palm turned up while the following is repeated: ‘I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of [319 U.S. 624, 629] America and to the Republic for which it stands; one Nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.'”
(***Notice that the word “God” is not included in the Pledge within this ruling, as the words “under God” were not added until 11 years after this court case, in the year 1953.)
“Failure to conform is ‘insubordination’ dealt with by expulsion. Readmission is denied by statute until compliance. Meanwhile the expelled child is ‘unlawfully absent‘ and may be proceeded against as a delinquent. His parents or guardians are liable to prosecution, and if convicted are subject to fine not exceeding $50 and jail term not exceeding thirty days.”
–=–
Now, does this requirement to say an oath to the United States flag sound like patriotism to you… or communism?
Listen to what this royal bloodline cousin of kings and presidents had to say:
“…at a meeting of Boy Scouts, presided over by the veteran founder of that organization, Colonel Dan Beard, the writer heard the thousand or more, standing at attention, shout “I pledge allegiance to my flag” and the rest of the words. In answer to his questions, Colonel Beard said: “Why, that’s said by the Boy Scouts every time they have a roundup, big or little—and for that matter, by the Pioneer Girls and the Campfire Girls too. It’s the A B C of training for citizenship. It was adopted from the public schools when the Scouts first started in 1905 — they didn’t have to learn it; it’s their regular hurrah for flag and country. I’ve heard it for nearly twenty years, from the top of Michigan to the toe of Florida, and from Montana back to New York again. The youngsters of every race say it and it makes Americans of them.”
What makes a child an American? Is it natural birthright (being natural-born)? Is it naturalization? Is it blood?
No, it is their pledge (oath) to a corporate flag as good little citizen soldiers…
The Wehrmacht Oath of Loyalty to Adolf Hitler, 2 August 1934, was pledged:
“I swearby God this sacred oath that to the Leader of the German empire and people, Adolf Hitler, supreme commander of the armed forces, I shall render unconditional obedience and that as a brave soldier I shall at all times be prepared to give my life for this oath.”
The current oath of enlisted soldiers of the United States also pledges:
“I, _____, do solemnly swear(or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).
–=–
Notice that these oaths by Nazi and U.S. military soldiers are not to protect the common people within the nation (whom in the United States are referred to as possible domestic “enemies of the State” in the “Trading With The Enemies Act”). Instead, these oaths only swear (or affirm in the U.S) to protect the United States government, its president, and its officers. This is an oath to protect the continuity of government against you, whoever you are; all 7 billion of you on Earth and including all U.S. citizens…
The constitution is the foundation of government, so allegiance to that piece of paper (charter) – as with worshiping its flag – is not allegiance in any way to the actual living, breathing, common people. The constitution did not create the people. The people were here long before the constitution. Creation is an act of God and/or nature, and the people of course existed long before the language of the constitution was created by men of a certain blood. The constitution in fact created govern-ment (control) of those people (men) who were first created of nature (God), creating in them each an artificial person. In other words, the constitution is not of nature (not created naturally), and is actually against nature and against the Bible (more on this later). The president is also but an office held by a government person (Corporation Sole) as designated by the constitution. And the enemies are not enemies of the people, but enemies against the continuity of government (control) of the people as a body politic and its corporate world-wide monopolies – including citizens and non-citizens (all natural people). Thus these United States oaths taken by military men and women are to protect artificial constructs, not real people. These are strawman oaths in that they are pledges to artificial persons and things.
–=– A False Oath To The
IncorporationOf Souls –=–
What is the purpose of becoming a Corporation Sole?
The first known Corporation Sole (to my current knowledge) was established by the Church of England in the year 1448. It is always and can only be legitimately established under an Ecclesiastical (religious law) body within its proper form.
Ecclesiastical Law was called the “Cannons of the Church” – a play on words so as to not actually use the word “law”. These “Canons” were essentially the forced adherence of the people by the State to matters of religious conscious by law (Canon). In other words, mind control. In order to guarantee that the ownership of real property was continued to be held by the Church outside of the control of the State, the concept of “Corporation Sole” was created as a legal fictional (artificial) person of the Church – a spiritual assembly, if you will. In the end, these Corporations Sole represent eternal life in an artificial legal capacity. In other words, the office for which the Corporation Sole creates is passed from living man to living man (or woman), who then becomes the Sole fiction of that office. The real property and political (ecclesiastical) powers are transferred or “conveyed” with the Corporation Sole to the new officer (soul).
Sound confusing? Well it’s supposed to. For you are not supposed to be a party to or have even a basic knowledge of this common law elitist privilege.
In a way, since the Corporation Sole has no need of a board of directors or other typical corporate charter requirements, you could say that this incorporation creates a “Sovereignty” – a dictatorship of one. It is called a Corporation “Sole” in reverence to the sole individual “soul” who fills the corporation.
The “Queen of England” as an office is a Corporation Sole overseen by the sole officer (the current living Queen), and its ministry is the government/church of England who allowed its creation within Ecclesiastical law. Many of the “Secretaries of State” in England are also individual Corporations Sole. The office of British Monarch in each Commonwealth Realm is also an individual and separate Corporation Sole. Thus, each time the Queen travels to one of her Commonwealth countries, she is doing so as a separate and unique officer (Corporation Sole) in each country – and is all but immune to that countries statutory base of legislative or parliamentary laws. For instance, in general and while in England, Queen Elizabeth II is the artificial person (Corporation Sole) named “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the United Kingdom”. Remember, this is the name of her corporation. But when governing (controlling) the Commonwealth of Canada, she takes the corporate role of “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada” – a completely separate Corporation Sole. In Australia she is “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Australia”. Again, these are all separate individual Corporations Sole.
Interestingly, because both Canada and Australia are politically established as “Federal” governments, the Queen also has individually distinct Corporations Sole for each “Province” of those two countries. When dealing specifically with the local government in Alberta, Canada, she switches corporate hats once again and becomes “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta”, and again for every other Province thereof. And when the Queen dies or advocates her throne, she will simply sign over here many Corporations Sole and all the “Rights” of real property (including whole continents) to the next bloodline Monarch (man or woman) in succession, likely her eldest son.
A Bishop in the Vatican (Church of Rome) is also acting as a Corporation Sole, where the current office of Bishop is the sole officer and its ministry is the Church of Rome. The office of “The Arch Bishop of Canterbury” is also an individual Corporation Sole of the Church. And of course the many Catholic Churches spread across the nations are also in utilization of Corporations Sole.
The Office (corporation) of the “The Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Later-day Saints” is also a Corporation Sole, where the office of the President is the sole officer and its ministry (people) is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. And this explains a lot… like why for so many years I could never find a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the “Mormon Church” corporation and its corporate holdings. For a Corporation Sole is not required to follow the Statutes that require such financial disclosure and auditing as other incorporated entities are!
Cities, districts, counties, and states, as well as the Federal government and its agencies are not Corporations Sole. They are bound by Statutory laws and must file a CAFR (independently audited “annual financial report”) and represent a multi-faceted “body politic” in their incorporation and are not of a “church”. Microsoft and Apple Corporations are also not Corporations Sole, for all of these have more than one person (i.e. president, vice-president, secretary, etc.).
But most importantly, this does not necessarily preclude the fact that the individual officers, including Bill Gates and the presidents of the United States, CEO’s, and political officers (legislators) of corporations and governments themselves are not individually acting under their own Corporation Sole instead of as real people (mankind).
In the United States today, the legal status called Corporation Sole is completely tax-exempt, is exclusively under common law (immune from laws called “statute”), and is recognized by all 50 states as such. It has to be, you see, or else states would not be able to recognize their own representatives who are acting under this capacity as individual Corporations Sole (representatives). You might say that this makes politicians immune from their own created laws (statutes). Like me, you may have often wondered why those in government get away with literal murder and organized crime under the “color” of office under the United States.
Now you know…
A Corporation Sole is perhaps best understood as an “unincorporated corporation”, where an individual (no employees) is the only person involved, making all decisions for the Corporation Sole without opposition, and having no corporate bylaws required (which are statutory and not requirements of or in the common law). By unincorporated I mean to say that the Corporation Sole is not officially a legal status granted by government, but instead one granted by an Ecclesiastical church/religion. Though its roots are steeped in antiquity, the Corporation Sole has ecclesiastically been used by the higher members of the church (government) for many centuries. The Pope, his Cardinals, and his Bishops are all individual Corporations Sole. The Royal Family and their representatives such as Prime Ministers are also individual Corporations Sole. And entities in United States politics such as “President Obama”, “Representative Ron Paul”, Governors, and other congressmen and the Vice President and Cabinet Heads are also individual Corporations Sole. They are acting under an Ecclesiastical (religion-based) office, which is for all intents and purposes immune to government’s legal Codes – the laws which they help to create for the rest of the “people”.
Ron Paul, for instance, is listed as a traded corporation on Dunn & Bradstreet (DNB.com) under these business listings:
It is important to note that if we check back here in 2017 after the next presidential election, this corporation known as “EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT” will then read to be “Also Traded as _____ __ _______”. In other words, it will be traded as whomever the next president as Corporation Sole will be when the office is passed in succession by Obama to his cousin and bloodline successor.
After all, a man cannot be “traded”. That would be slavery.
But the artificial person (Corporation Sole) is not a man – it is a thing.
For further understanding, let’s read from Black’s Law 1st. edition:
CORPORATION SOLE. A corporation consisting of one person only, and his successors in some particular station, who are incorporated by law in order to give them some legal capacities and advantages, particularly that of perpetuity, which in their natural persons they could not have had. In this sense, the sovereign in England is a sole corporation, so is a bishop, so are some deans distinct from their several chapters, and so is every parson and vicar. A corporation sole consists of a single person, who is made a body corporate and politic, in order to give him some legal capacities and advantages, and especially that of perpetuity; as a bishop, dean, etc.
Black’s 5th Edition states:
Corporation sole. Unusual type of corporation consisting of only one person whose successor becomes the corporation on his death or resignation; limited in the main today to bishops and heads of dioceses.”
And we can read from the Massachusetts Supreme Court, in the case of “The Overseers of the Poor of the City of Boston v. David Sears 39 Mass (2Pick) 122 at 128 (1839)”:
“…the distinction between an aggregate and sole corporation, growing out of the different modes of constitution and forms of action, is striking and obvious. A bishop or parsons acting in a corporate capacity and holding property to him and his successor in right of office, has no need of a corporate name, he performs all legal acts under his own seal, in his own name and name of office; his own will alone regulates his acts, needs no treasurer, for he has no personal property except the rents and proceeds for the corporate estate, and these he takes to his own use when received. By-laws are unnecessary, for he regulates his own action, by his own will and judgment, like any other individual acting in his own right. These examples are sufficient to clarify the legal distinctions between the two classes of corporations.”
The question we should be asking is this: If a Corporation Sole is religious or “ecclesiastical” in origin, how is a government that promotes separation of church and state – a government supposedly without a declared central religion – able to form such religious Corporations Sole?
Is there a hidden or “Mystery” religion from which this ability to Ecclesiastically incorporate originates within said United States corporation?
The answer to that question represents the thesis put forward in this essay series; to uncover and prove a theocracy where one seemingly and supposedly does not exist…
–=–
Religion:
“Man’s relation to Divinity, to reverence, worship, obedience, and submission to mandates and precepts of supernatural or superior beings. In its broadest sense includes all forms of belief in the existence of superior beings exercising power over human beings by volition, imposing rules of conduct, with future rewards and punishments. Bond uniting man to GOD, and a virtue whose purpose is to render GOD worship due him as source of all being and principle of all government of things“
“Nikulnikoff v. Archbishop, etc., of Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church, 142 Misc. 894, 255 N.Y.S. 653, 663.”
–Black’s Law: 5th Edition
–=–
Are you contractually bonded to the United States’ religion of law;
a government that claims to rule through God?
Perhaps you should read that definition once more…
We will read this legal definition again at the end of Part 1, after the
knowledge contained within will make its meaning much more clear.
–=–
In short, these “oaths” taken by United States (not American) soldiers as seen above are no different than the blind pledge of allegiance taken by school children to an inanimate object called a flag. Through the illusion of nationalism and patriotism, the majority of these men and women of the military have no idea that their pledge is to an artificial municipal corporation named Washington D.C, and to the artificial “Corporations Sole” who occupy it. This oath is not to their actual living family, their friends, America, and Americans or to any of “the people”.
Interestingly, all of these oaths include God as their witness, though those who took the German Oath of Loyalty did not have the choice to make an affirmation (an oath not of or under God) as the United States oath offers.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, defines these important religious and non-religious acts as specifically opposite from one another:
OATH. A declaration made according to law, before a competent tribunal or officer, to tell the truth; or it is the act of one who, when lawfully required to tell the truth, takes God to witness that what he says is true. It is a religious act by which the party invokes God not only to witness the truth and sincerity of his promise, but also to avenge his imposture or violated faith, or in other words to punish his perjury if he shall be guilty of it. 2. It is proper to distinguish two things in oaths; (1.) The invocation by which the God of truth, who knows all things, is taken to witness. (2.) The imprecation by which he is asked as a just and all-powerful being, to punish perjury. 3. The commencement of an oath is made by the party taking hold of the book, after being required by the officer to do so, and ends generally with the words,”so help you God,” and kissing the book, when the form used is that of swearing on the Evangelists. 4. Oaths are taken in various forms; the most usual is upon the Gospel by taking the book in the hand; the words commonly used are, “You do swear that, ” & “so help you God,” and then kissing the book. The origin of this oath may be traced to the Roman law, and the kissing the book is said to be an imitation of the priest’s kissing the ritual as a sign of reverence, before he reads it to the people. 5. Another form is by the witness or party promising holding up his right hand while the officer repeats to him,”You do swear by Almighty God, the searcher of hearts, that… “And this as you shall answer to God at the great day.” 6. In another form of attestation commonly called an affirmation, the officer repeats, “You do solemnly, sincerely, and truly declare and affirm, that,” (i.e. without God)… 7. The oath, however, may be varied in any other form, in order to conform to the religious opinions of the person who takes it…
(**Note that these definitions in Bouvier’s and Black’s Law dictionaries include “case law” references, meaning these definitions are paraphrases of actual court decisions and opinions. For the purposes of this essay, those references have been removed for ease of reading and comprehension. See dictionaries for case references.)
Here we see that the oath is in all accounts a religious test and sacrament. And it is important to note that one who does not fear God or who swears to another god or Deity will not be at all worried about lying under oath upon the Bible, for if the devil truly exists, that “lord of lies” would surely require perjury from its followers.
AFFIRMANT, practice. One who makes affirmationinstead of making oath that the evidence which he is about to give shall be the truth, as if he had been sworn. He is liable to all the pains and penalty of perjury, if he shall be guilty of willfully and maliciously violating his affirmation.
AFFIRMATION, practice. A solemn declaration and asseveration, which a witness makes before an officer, competent to administer an oath in a like case, to tell the truth, as if be had been sworn. 2. In the United States, generally, all witnesses who declare themselves conscientiously scrupulous against taking a corporal oath, are permitted to make a solemn affirmation, and this in all cases, as well criminal as civil. 3. In England, laws have been enacted which partially relieve persons who, have conscientious scruples against taking an oath, and authorize them to make affirmation. In France, the laws which allow freedom of religious opinion, have received the liberal construction that all persons are to be sworn or affirmed according to the dictates of their consciences; and a quaker’s affirmation has been received and held of the same effect as an oath. 4. The form is to this effect: “You, A B, do solemnly, sincerely, and truly declare and affirm…” For the violation of the truth in such case, the witness is subject to the punishment of perjury” as if he had been sworn. 5. Affirmation also means confirming; as, an affirmative statute.
–=– The Hypocritical Affirmation Of
The Mormon Corporation Sole –=–
For the purposes of this research, remember that to affirm in the Untied States jurisdiction is to purposefully not swear an oath under the Biblical Christian “God”, and more specifically to not be under the punishment or wrath of that “God” for perjury in this life and/or in the “after-life”. Of course, religious leaders and politicians with no irony or hesitation often choose to be affirmed in court cases and in congress instead of being sworn in under “God”. This is no irony, but a purposeful deceit to purger or withhold information from a government that protects that act of purger through the act of affirmation. Affirmation is dishonesty masked under a false legal status of credibility, and it is a choice often made by men who take the mark of Corporations Sole.
It is one thing for a random man to affirm due to his contentions with organized religion, it is a whole other can of worms when it is the leader or president of a corporate religion who chooses to affirm in court instead of swearing to tell the truth with God as his witness and accept His wrath for perjury…
In the case of the corporation called the Mormon Church, we have the incredible revelations of the Reed Smoot Senate hearing as a perfect example…
When then president of the Mormon “church”, Mr. Joseph F. Smith, was called to testify before Congress in 1906, he was requested by the Senate to “swear in”. Instead, he is quoted below as stating in the congressional record that “I prefer to affirm, if you please.” In other words, the supposedly Christian Mormon President and current “Prophet” of God incarnate wished not to swear to that God that he would tell the truth underGod’s wrath. Of course he was likely doing so as an artificial “Corporation Sole”. The record then directly states, “Joseph F. Smith, having duly affirmed, testifies as follows…“.
Having avoided the wrath of God for perjury, the clever “prophet” Smith was free to lie and obfuscate without God in the name of his Corporation.
The following is from the official transcript of that Senate hearing and makes for a very interesting read:
Why such an official protest from the electors of the States?
“We… protest: that Apostle Reed Smoot, Senator elect from the State of Utah…
ought not be permitted to qualify by taking the oath of office or to sit as a
Member of the United States Senate, for reasons effecting the honor
and dignity of the United States and their Senators in Congress.”
Why?
“Ruling Authorities” of the Mormon Church claim:
“…Supreme authority, divinely mentioned, to shape the belief and control
the conduct under them in all matters whatsoever, civil and religious, temporal and spiritual, and who uniting in themselves authority in church and state…”
**In other words, a Mormon’s oath to the Church takes
precedent over their oath to the country, the same reason that those
in the know today do not wish Mitt Romney to obtain the seat of President.
How?
“Men who hold the (Mormon) priesthood possess divine authority to act for God,
and by possessing part of God’s power they are in reality part of God…
those who reject it (the priesthood bestowed by the church), reject God.”
Mormon / Masonic Sunstone (Sun worship).
Mormon Church (Assembly Hall) inside of “Temple Square”,
The Mormon corporate headquarters or “Vatican” of Salt Lake City
Joseph Smith’s Book of Mormon speaks of the restoration of Israel:
“And it came to pass that I, Nephi, spake much unto them
concerning these things; yea, I spake unto them concerning the restoration of the Jews in the latter days.”
“And I did rehearse unto them the words of Isaiah, who spake
concerning the restoration of the Jews, or of the house of Israel;
and after they were restored they should no more be confounded,
neither should they be scattered again.”
–=–
During the 1930s and 1940s, Mormon Senators William King and Elbert Thomas were both Democrats from Utah.
Both men were fervent Christian Zionists.
**Zionism is support for the illegal “State” of Israel. Clandestinely though, Zionism’s goal is to reestablish the “Kingdom of Jerusalem” and rebuild Solomon’s Temple.
For the Star of David is actually the ancient Seal of Solomon…
As we will soon realize, this is the goal of all Masonic religions and societies worldwide.
Senator Thomas visited Jerusalem in 1912.
According to his diary, he sat on the Mount of Olives and read from the
writings of early Mormon leader Orson Hyde about the Jews:
“Consecrate this land for the gathering together of Judah’s
scattered remnants, for the building up of Jerusalem again
after it has been trodden down by the Gentiles so long.
Restore the kingdom unto Israel, raise up Jerusalem as its capitol.”
Mormon Senator William King was one of the founding members
of the American Palestine Committee – an organization set up
in the 1930s to rally Christian support for Jewish statehood.
Sen. Thomas developed close ties to Benzion Netanyahu,
who in those days was director of the Revisionist Zionists’ American division.
David Ben Gurion, first president of the Israeli “State” from 1948 stated:
“You know, there are no people in the world
who understand the Jews like the Mormons.”
–=–
As part of the Reed Smoot case, it was necessary to ascertain for the record the incredible monopolies of private corporations that were held and operated by the Mormon Church and its leadership, including Union Pacific Railroad, and that was also acting as the government of Utah. It is shocking to consider the power of this religious incorporation then, especially when considering how much it has grown in the last 100 years. For instance, the Mormon corporation named “Bonneville Communications” just a decade ago owned a virtual monopoly on every talk radio station in Washington D.C. before selling (privatizing) them to other Mormons – members by blood in that Masonic Brotherhood of the Church – to give the appearance that the corporation of the Church no longer held that monopoly.
In government, this is called privatization.
We read this incredible admission in the senate record, as stated officially by the affirmed and arrogant president of the Church Joseph F. Smith. Note that Smith is the “Successor” of the previous “prophets” and presidents of the church, signifying the passing of not only the Corporation Sole, but the claim of divinity and rule by and through God, as stated below, “…endowed with all the powers that they were possessed of”:
Not Ironically, the Sheriff of Salt Lake County is none other than a Mormon descendent named Jim Winder of the aforementioned Winder in this case, whose brother is a City Mayor, and whose Mormon family have 10 generations in politics in Utah.
You can read about my personal battles to try and expose what Sheriff Winder has done to Salt Lake County in my research article and documentary below:
And also view my lecture about special districts
taking over lawful government in a County near you
–=– The United States Theocracy –=–
If the sudden realization of the true communist nature of the American “Pledge of Allegiance” to the Untied States is surprising to you, especially if you are a parent today, then I hope this new knowledge will be enough to move you to continue down this rabbit hole and finish reading the information that I have provided here. Imagine the shock you might feel if the history of the constitution and its so-called “founding fathers” were also revealed to be something quite different than what you’ve always imagined or learned – what your children are learning today in required government schools. What other beliefs might be promoted in our government funded schools, Universities, and media monopolies that realize their origins in a similar form of communism and fascism? And what if I were to tell you that I can conclusively show you today that the United States is not nor ever has been a republic, a democracy, nor any other political moniker… but is instead and always has been a clandestine (hidden) theocracy?
THEOCRACY. A species of government which claims to be immediately directed by God… Religion, which in former times, frequently associated itself with despotism, to reign, by its power, or under its shadow, has sometimes attempted to reign alone, and this she has called the reign of God, theocracy. –Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856
THEOCRACY.Government of a state by the immediate direction of God, (or by the assumed direction of a supposititious divinity), or the state thus governed. –Black’s Law Dictionary, 4rth Edition
A “State thus governed (controlled)” by those who claim to be directed by God or some god-like divinity or deity…
Sounds about accurate when considering the righteously pompous men who rule (as Corporations Sole) with impunity against the will of mankind in the Untied States, doesn’t it? After all, when was the last time Congress or the president acted upon the will of the people as opposed to the will of the corporate world?
Is the United States constitution, its form of government, and its political leadership really the first government in world history to not be ordained by and head the Holy church? Is its power really based on “we, the common people”? Or is that authority in fact based on a higher power than man, so as to be a (Masonic/Deist) theocracy? And did the “Founding Fathers” create the United States and its constitution under God… or under affirmation?
The answers to these questions and evidence provided herein will certainly surprise you.
–=– Is Freemasonry a religion? –=–
Well, it depends on whom you ask. For designated corporate religions are bound by laws (Statutes), while Orders make their own.
The Supreme Court of Nebraska decided that:
“The guiding thought (of Masonry) is not religion but religious toleration …. The Masonic fraternity refrains from intruding into the field of religion and confines itself to the teaching of morality and duty to one’s fellow men, which makes better men and better citizens… The distinction is clear between such ethical teachings and the doctrines of religion. One cannot espouse a religion without belief and faith in its peculiar doctrines. A fraternity broad enough to take in and cover with its mantle Christian, Moslem and Jew, without requiring him to renounce his religion, is not a religious organization, although its members may join in prayer which, in the case of each, is a petition addressed to his own Deity. Neither can the belief in the immortality of the soul be denominated religious in the sense that it is typical of any religion, of any race, or of any age. It constitutes one of the most beautiful and consoling features of our own religion, but it is equally found in almost every other. It is so unusual and spontaneous that it is not so much belief or dogma as it is an instinct of the human soul. Neither does it imply or require adherence to any system of religious worship… The fact that belief in the doctrines or deity of no particular religion is required, of itself refutes the theory that the Masonic ritual embodies a religion, or that its teachings are religious.”
–“Let There Be Light”, by Alphonse Cerza, The Masonic Service Association, 1983.
–=–
But when it comes to saving a few shekels by keeping a tax-exempt status and protecting their property, the Masons are quite happy to be named as a pseudo “religion”:
SCOTTISH RITE CATHEDRAL vs. ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES et al.
“Freemasonry is a religion – a California appeals court ruled on Oct 3, and its adherents must be given equal standing as other faiths under US law. In a case involving the Los Angeles Scottish Rite Cathedral and the City of Los Angeles, the Seventh District Court of Appeals in Los Angeles held it could not distinguish between “the earnest pursuit of [Masonic] principles… from more widely acknowledged modes of religious exercise” such as Christianity or Judaism.
The Court was asked to hear the Freemasons appeal of a lower court’s ruling that the City of Los Angeles could regulate the use of the Masonic cathedral. The Scottish Rite Freemasons argued that while they were not a formal “religion”, their property should however be exempted from government regulation to the same degree that churches were exempted so as to allow them the free “religious exercise”.
They cited the US Federal law the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 in support of their contention, saying it prohibits a government from implementing a land use regulation in a way that “imposes a substantial burden” on one’s “religious exercise.”
The Court held that it could find “no decisions analyzing whether Masonic practices are sufficiently religious in nature to qualify for protection” under law.
However it used the test adopted by the courts in the case of the US v Meyers that presented a five-pronged test in defining whether a creed or belief was a “religious belief” and determined it was a religion.
“Although Freemasonry does not identify itself as a religion” the Court stated “it plainly fosters principles and practices that resemble religious exercise.””
This is a brilliant circumvention of law here, where the Masonic Rite is considered a religion for certain legal purposes by a Masonic (BAR) Judge, but inversely is not required to register and incorporate as a religion. This is like a man being granted women’s rights status while remaining a legal man.
Interestingly, that five-pronged test listed in this court case is sourced to include:
“The Meyers court adopted a multi-part test inquiring into (1) the ultimate ideas embraced by the asserted belief; (2) metaphysical ideas addressing transcendence of the physical world; (3) moral or ethical systems constraining an adherent’s conduct; (4) comprehensiveness of beliefs; and (5) accoutrements of religion such as a founder or teacher, important writings, gathering places, keepers of knowledge, ceremonies and rituals, structure and propagation or recruitment. (U.S. v. Meyers, supra, 906 F.Supp. at pp. 1502-1503.)”
Thus, Masonry is protected as if it were a religion and accepts the benefits thereof, even though it vehemently opposes the legal title and statutes that bind a corporate “religion”.
Sadly, the same could honestly be said of many members of supposedly Christian incorporated religions today…
–=–
“In 1952, eighty-nine percent of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices were Freemasons.”
–‘10,000 Famous Freemasons’, by William R. Denslow
–=– Our Citizenship To The
Temple Of The United States –=–
As painful as these above images are with regards to the origins of this childhood indoctrination process of public education, blind allegiance, and the forced patriotism and nationalism that most of us have unwittingly participated in – contributing ever so much to our collective lack of knowledge and its side-effect of servitude – it is still more troubling to be in the position I’m in at this very moment. For with knowledge comes duty; the natural pull on ones senses to inform ones fellow man of a clear and present danger that is literally killing and enslaving my people and, militarily, millions and likely soon to be billions across the world. And so I present the following essay simply because it is the duty of having attained such knowledge, regardless of the consequences or enemies it may realize, and because truly no man is free unless all men are free.
Thus, no man is free unless all men have knowledge…
–=–
How to build a logical fallacy – An appeal to Holy authority,
by Sean Hannity and courtesy of Fox News.
“European mysticism was not dead at the time the United States of America was founded. The hand of the Mysteries controlled in the establishment of the new government, for the signature of the Mysteries may still be seen on the Great Seal of the United States of America. Carefully analysis of the seal discloses a mass of occult and Masonic symbols, chief among them the so-called American eagle—a bird which Benjamin Franklin declared unworthy to be chosen as the emblem of a great, powerful, and progressive people. Here again only the student of symbolism can see through the subterfuge and realize that American eagle upon the Great Seal is but a conventionalized phoenix, a fact plainly discernible from an examination of the original seal. In his sketch of the “History of the Seal of the United States,” Gaillard Hunt unwittingly brings forward much material to substantiate the belief that the original seal carried the phoenix bird on its obverse surface. . .”
“Not only were many of the founders of the United States Government Masons, but they received aid from a secret and august body existing in Europe, which helped them to establish this country for a peculiar and particular purpose known only to the initiated and for the most part unknown–and the unfinished pyramid upon its reverse side is a trestle-board setting forth symbolically the task to the accomplishments of which the United States Government was dedicated from the day of its inception.”
–Manly P. Hall; “The Secret Teachings of All Ages” pages xc and xci
“The Great Seal”
The Eye of Providence was a well-known classical
symbol of the deity since at least the Renaissance.
–=–
Original 1782 description for the Great Seal of the United States of America
–=–
E-Pluribus Unum = “Out of Many, One.”
Annuit Conceptis = “Announcing the Birth (of)”
Novus Ordo Seclorum = “New Order (Cycle) of the Ages”
–=–
Franklin’s early design on a 1776 currency note
“We Are One – American Congress”
–=–
Note that the City of Philadelphia was given the Masonic nick-name:
“The City of Brotherly Love”
–=–
–=–
I realize now that citizenship to the United States (a series of corporate buildings in Washington D.C. fashioned in Roman architecture and Egyptian symbols) is wholly un-American. To the average United States citizen, this statement would generally be considered offensive – and even thought to be something akin to sacrilege. Of course, this is but a surface reaction by those with patriotism but without knowledge of what they are irrationally defending, as would be expected by any member of a cult. Ironically, this word is in fact a religious term; a fallacy in its appeal to god-like authority – often used by various religions and cults when their irrational authority, holiness, or doctrines are challenged by factual evidence. For to challenge government or church authority is literally to challenge God!
But if these terms are religious in nature, why are the legal dictionaries throughout U.S. history littered with them as valid and modern legal terminology?
Of course, the most historically accurate and most obvious answer to this question is that throughout history, ALL governments have been derived via similar ceremonies and coronations of the national Church and religion, where the sovereign king, queen, dictator, or ruler claims authority not only by God, but through Him, and is generally appointed by blood relation to previous kings and by sacred anointment as the head of the church and country.
As it was, so it is today…
But then came along little old America, completely funded by the Masonic Monarchs of France and Great Britain (with its Virginia Corporation and East India Company). And yet we are to believe that the United States’ authority is derived by the “constitution” of a few scraggly outlaw settlers (who just happened to be wealthy slave-owning bloodline cousins of those same Plantagenet Kings as well as Freemasons), whom suddenly realized that separation of church and state was the way to go in their Order amongst the New World?
Of course this is absolutely contradictory to the fallacious notion that the United States was constituted as a “Christian” nation by Christian men. As we will read later, the founding fathers were certainly not Christian men, and instead were vehemently opposed to Christianity and the uncontrolled (ungoverned) organization of its churches – according to their own writings. This story of the United States being founded with Christian roots is just one more fallacy that must see its ruination if the good Christian and non-Christian people of America ever wish to be truly free of this Deist, Masonic world government (mind control); to stop fighting amongst themselves so as to focus on the real enemies among them and over them – as has been from the dawn of civilization.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856 actually defines the derivatives of this word sacrilege as a legal terminology:
SACRILEGE. The act of stealing from the temples or churches dedicated to the worship of God, articles consecrated to divine uses.
Of course, theft from the churches was theft from government, for government was ordained by the church and government headed the church in true symbiotic fashion. But what about here in the United States?
Well, let me ask you some questions…
Do you truly believe that the seven “Articles” within the constitution of the United States are sacred in their use by presidents, congressmen, and justices for the worship of the Christian God as His law?
How about the “Articles of Confederation“?
Do you really believe these sacred articles were of a Christian origin?
Gnostic answer: The craft now called Masonry predates Christianity by thousands of years.
We are certainly told over an over that these documents were divinely inspired by those cult-like citizens and constitutional attorney’s who worship the constitution as if it were the idol of the golden calf. And yet in the same sentence we may also hear again how important the separation of Church and State is to that government.
The constitution is clear:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”–1st Amendment
“…no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”–Article VI
This establishment of religion clause refers to a central or federal religion such as the Church of England. Yet, as we will discuss, this concept of Qualification via religious Test and belief is the very foundation of government, despite what this constitution states for public consumption. For the oath is a sacred sacrament to “God”, and a requirement for government office.
So why is this sacred oath made by government officials directed to “God” and not to the people for whom that oath is supposed to protect if indeed there is a separation of church and State? Oh, that’s right, the Oath only pledges loyalty to the artificial government and its founding constitution, not to the actual living natural people – because government is not the people!
Consider this… In Masonry, the belief in some form of “higher power” is a virtual requirement for membership (citizenship) in Masonry, though exactly which god or form of worship one chooses is up to the initiate. Other than being a requirement to vaguely believe, is this not a perfect description of the “freedom of religion” and “separation of church and state” ideals that was the Masonic founding of America? Masonry: the pseudo-religion that stands on the back of and tolerates all others. Does anything else really explain these contradictions in the American way? And what better way to protect this Masonic Brotherhood as the rulers of government than to deny the organization of religion from government operations, while keeping the hall meetings of Masons where government is planned a secret from the people?
Interestingly, we see the sacrament of religion in the legal aspect of the political oath as well. Politicians generally swear their oath to the government upon the Holy Bible, so help them and as seen above, despite these religious freedom clauses in the constitution that would seemingly make the sole use of the Christian Bible for such oaths unlawful. In courtrooms, witnesses are also sworn in with the Bible.
The current congressional oath was enacted in 1884:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
Here again we can read that the congressional oath has nothing to do with protecting or serving the people of America. In fact, it specifically states that a Congressman must protect government against the domestic citizens (the people). It is an oath to the continuity of the Masonic institution of government called the United States. And of course the option to affirm is granted. The fallacy that the constitution somehow refers to the people is egregious and a frighteningly ignorant qualification by the minds of the governed, especially when we read an oath that protects the constitution from the people!
Please also not that this pledge has very Masonic undertones, in that when a Mason take a pledge in the lodge ceremony, he does so “freely and without coercion”.
At the Executive level, we can hear our current president state his allegiance and oath to protect the corporate constitution and government, but never are the living breathing people or America ever mentioned…
And the people cheer…
Even though it is them the Constitution needs protection from.
–=–
So where did this concept of the oath come from?
Another word for oath is the religious and legal word “sacrament”.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary of 1856 explains simply:
SACRAMENTUM. An oath; as, qui dicunt supra sacramentum suum.
At its basic root, we can see that the swearing of religeous oath allows certain legal rights as the sacra-ment of honor, title, and status. From Blacks Law 4rth Edition, we can see the true roots of the word sacra-ment:
SACRA. Lat. In Roman law. The right to participate inthe sacred rites of the city.
The sacra-mentum (oath) is stated to acquire authority from “God” in the sacred rites of the city…
The word rite (Latin ritus) is defined as: A RELIGIOUS CUSTOM. Of course, governments have always held their rights under the religious dogma and customs of their perspective State churches. The Monarchy of England and the Church of England (formally the Roman Catholic Church as Rome and its Vatican) is just one example… And yet this religious “sacra” in the United States never seems to be acknowledged as such. Instead, the people still believe that their government is somehow of themselves (of the common people) and separated from the mystery religions, even as it kills, harms, imprisons, taxes, extorts, and kidnaps the common people and their children under some other authority it gains by swearing an oath to some higher power over those “people” in a religious custom.
Consent of the governed = Consent of the controlled.
Sacrament = rite of control of the “city” over the mind (of and for the people).
Imagine the hilarity government officers (Masons under sacred oath) must feel as they pretend to use the consent of the very governed (i.e. controlled) people they harm, tax, imprison, kill, and steal the property of as the excuse for its actions against those same people (citizens). And it uses the 5th Amendment of the very constitution those people have been trained to hold dear as its claim of power and authority to steal from the citizens even as the people scream that it’s unconstitutional (see “eminent domain” defined in part 2).
Blacks Law 4rth expounds upon this sacrament oath to government:
SACRAMENTUM. Lat. Roman Law – An oath, as being a very sacred thing; more particularly, the oath taken by soldiers to betrue to their general and their country(to government, not its people). In one of the formal methods of beginning an action at law (legis actiones) known to the early Roman jurisprudence, the sacramentum was a sum of money deposited in court by each of the litigating parties, as a kind of wager or forfeit, to abide the result of the suit. The successful party received back his stake; the losing party forfeited his, and it was paid into the public treasury, to be expended for sacred objects, (in sacris rebus,) whence the name. At common law the Sacramentum is an oath.
Has anything really changed since the time of Roman domination (domain)? Of course not. For the Roman bloodlines still rule us today in America and throughout the world – a sacred cousinly dominion by blood claiming God-like authority granted by themselves over all common-blood people.
The forfeit of monetary sacramentum (sacred dollars as collateral) is now called “bail” (bailment) in the dishonorable de facto BAR administrative U.S. courts, similar to the ancient Roman system of sacramentum. The common law oath is just a replacement for the insurance money deposited for sacrament – for now we give our “word” as the word of God in court, following the copyrighted and sacred articles as set forth by the BAR Association and its international law society. And the fees paid for tickets and citations are placed into the public treasury’s investment funds, where they are used to buy sacred objects like stocks, bonds, real estate, foreign currencies, derivatives, and CUSIP commodities – the exaction (extortion) of monies from the common man to purchase power and wealth for government.
When we consider that the “oath” is assigned through the root word sacra as a rite or “religious custom”, we must consider that the oath is allowing one to enter government (control of people) through the riteof religious ceremony (ritual) so as to obtain the religious right to govern (control) – as in “the sacred rites of the city“. This is the way it’s been done for thousands of years.
SACRILEGIUM. Lat. In the civil law. The stealing of sacred things, or things dedicated to sacred uses; the taking of things out of a holy place. –Black’s Law 4th Edition
Is the United States dollar a sacred thing used for sacred uses? How about its banks that magically create that money through its Holy Federal Reserve via the oath (application and signature) of the common man?
If we think about this question not as satire but as a reality, we may understand why using the dollar for things that are against the law of that government (the holy place in Washington D.C.) are punishable by extreme measures like fines, confiscation, imprisonment, and even death.
–=–
“The United States Debt, foreign and domestic, was the price of liberty.”
–Alexander Hamilton, as quoted by government’s ‘Bureau of the Public Debt’ website
–=–
“IN GOD WE TRUST”
But what kind of trust?
–=–
Notice that these words IN GOD WE TRUST are all capitalized, hiding the knowledge of whether the word god should be capitalized or not (God vs. god), as in the Masonic “deity”.
So why does a government with a declared separation of church and state print the words IN GOD WE TRUST upon its money? And how is one to know which of the many gods of history it is referring to?
In which god do they trust?
Given the Federal Reserve’s interest charged on its dollars compared to the biblical teachings against the money-changing bankers and their system of usury and pledging, it is fairly easy to assume that the teachings of Jesus and most other religious doctrines (excepting Judaism) are not considered in this statement of “trust” of a “god”.
The questions that you may not have thought to ask are these: How and why is the word GOD being used here on a government monetary instrument? What exactly is a legal “trust“? As a legal term on Legal Tender, is this money actually a monetary banking TRUST of GOD through some god’s sacramentum government?
This quote from the congressional record will be examined further on in this essay, but should be considered here when trying to define just what kind of trust we are talking about:
“The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.”–Congressman Patman, speaking from the Congressional Record of March 9, 1933, and referring to the Act of March 9, 1933.
While many arm-chair patriots exclaim that the dollar is a worthless note printed out of thin air, we must here reconsider this idiom as fallacy – for this quote was made when the dollar was in the process of being stripped of its gold-standard backing and on its way to becoming a fiat currency, even as gold was being confiscated (stolen) by government from the supposedly “free” people. Thus, the dollar is literally backed in this god trust by the registered United States “persons” and their “property” as the surety for the value of the dollar.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, expounds upon the legal word Trust:
TRUST, contracts, devises. An equitable right, title or interest in property, real or personal, distinct from its legal ownership; or it is a personal obligation for paying, delivering or performing anything, where the person (citizen) trusting has no real right or security, for by, that acthe confides altogether to the faithfulness of those intrusted. This is its most general meaning, and includes deposits, bailments, and the like. In its more technical sense, it may be defined to be an obligation upon a person, arising out of a confidence reposed in him, to apply property faithfully, and according to such confidence… 6. When land is purchased by one man in the name of another, and the former pays the consideration money, the land will in general be held by the grantee in Trust for the person who so paid the consideration money… 8. When a contract is made for the sale of land, in equity the vendor is immediately deemed a trustee for the vendee of the estate; and the vendee, a trustee for the vendor of the purchase money; and by this means there is an equitable conversion of the property.
**Note that by this definition, it is the people putting all of their possessions into a “trust” to the government as an obligation or duty of citizenship. Thus, the words IN GOD WE TRUST are not simply a patriotic Christian pledge of allegiance to God on United States currency. It is literally a sacred and holy legal trust. For the dollar is “Legal Tender”, not a religious devotion. Government is the trustee of all public funds, lands, and property through Masonic Divine rite – the right to the city.
TRUSTEE, estates. A trustee is one to whom an estate has been conveyed in trust… 3. With respect to the duties of trustees, it is held, in conformity to the old law of uses, that pernancy (taking or receiving of something – as profits or rents or tithes in kind) of the profits, execution of estates, and defense of the land, are the three great properties of a trust, so that the courts of chancery will compel trustees, (1.) To permit the cestui que trust to receive the rents and profits of the land. (2.) To execute such conveyances, in accordance with the provisions of the trust, as the cestui que trust shall direct. (3.) To defend the title of the land in any court of law or equity.
The people never realize that their homes, their automobiles, their children, and any other property for which they register to government is a deranged act of conversion and conveyance of those things to government as trustee, signifying ownership by government and used by it as collateral for its currency – a legal Trust in “God’s” name.
CONVEYANCE, contracts. The transfer of the title to land by one or more persons to another or others. By the term persons is here understood not only natural persons but corporations. The instrument which conveys the property is also called a conveyance. For the several kinds of conveyances see Deed…
Of course, the conveyance or deed of property includes the artificial person attached to all citizens (14th amendment persons), of which the man, woman, or child is the “surety”.
Take the legal trust called Social Security for example. The common misconception is to apply the conversational definition to the word “security”, when in fact government only deals in legal language.
The word Security is defined as a “monetary instrument” in modern day financial and legal terms, and is traded openly on the international commodities markets as “bundled securities”. And of course the Social Security System is actually an investment “Trust Fund”.
SECURITY. That which renders a matter sure; an instrument which renders certain the performance of a contract. The term is also sometimes applied to designate a person who becomes the surety for another, or who engages himself for the performance of another’s contract. –Bouvier’s, 1856
SECURITY. Protection; assurance; indemnification. The term is usually applied to an obligation, pledge, mortgage, deposit, lien, etc., given by a debtor in order to make sure the payment or performance of his debt, by furnishing the creditor with a resource to be used in case of failure in the principal obligation. The name is also sometimes given to one who becomes surety or guarantor for another. –Black’s Law, 4rth Edition
Something very important is stated here. For the natural living, breathing people of America furnish the United States government (creditor) with themselves (their flesh and blood) as the “resource” to be used in case of failure in the principal obligation.
Just what is a “principal” obligation?
PRINCIPAL, adj. Chief; leading; most important or considerable; primary; original. Highest in rank, authority, character, importance, or degree. As to principal “Challenge,” “Contract,” “Obligation,” “Office,” and “Vein,” see those titles…
PRINCIPAL, n. The source of authority or right. A superintendent, as of a school district. The capital sum of a debt or obligation, as distinguished from interest or other additions to it. The corpus or capital of an estate in contradistinction to the income; “income” being merely the fruit of capital.
PRINCIPAL (Law of Agency) – The employer or constitutor of an agent; the person who gives authority to an agent or attorney to do some act for him. Called also constituent or chief. One, who, being competent sui juris to do any act for his own benefit or on his own account, confides it to another person to do for him.
PRINCIPAL (Law of Guaranty and Suretyship) – The person primarily liable, for whose performance of his obligation the guarantor or surety has become bound.
It is very difficult to explain the dualistic nature of just what being a citizen means. For citizenship is nothing but a series of legal contracts with the United States government and representing “residence” in its jurisdiction, signed (or unsigned) by a real, living man or woman in America (the land mass including the 50 states united). This is often called a “Stawman”, though a more apt description would be a “Paperman”. The living man becomes the surety of this paper alter ego – the corporation called the artificial person (citizen). Thus, the Social Security system is nothing more than a contractual statement of debt and obligation of men as citizens to government (creditor); a pledge; a mortgage and lien against the man with the requirement to deposit funds into that GOD-TRUST as surety (debtor) for the citizen Paperman.
The word social simply refers to all individual citizens as one body of indebted (constituted) artificial persons in obligation to the creditor (government). Each man in society (under government) is obligated to pay his principal share or offer himself (the real man) as the resource to pay the debt as surety.
E-Pluribus Unum…
Out of Many, One…
Understanding the nature of this literal “Number of the Beast” of Social Security as a Mark of indentured servitude to the world government is vitally important. For this number is your bar code – your registration number as a commodity backing the U.S. dollar. Shedding it is the only way to satisfy the obligation of performance as the surety to the Paperman. For severing the number from the living man leaves no obligation (duty) of surety (responsibility) to the state of indebtedness to the “public debt” assigned to the entire S.S. numbered citizenry.
There are some who claim that by individuals becoming each a Corporation Sole, this whole statutory game of surety and debt, including the Social Security obligations, would be nullified under the common law only device of Corporation Sole. To this I have not done due diligence in research, and so I will only state it hear for your benefit in your own journey.
But how do you convince a bunch of slaves that they are better off without the benefits provided by government – that the only road to salvation and to a state of being free men is to abandon and say no to Federal government granted benefits?
Here lies the greatest and most deceitful dilemma of all… for the Social Security slaves believe they are already free despite their contractual nature and financial obligations of indebtedness with government.
Debt = Slavery
Please link to my previous research, which shows that the Social Security System was created in the League of Nations, almost a decade before being implemented in the United States, and that today this Social Security System is being managed in the United Nations under the World Bank, organized under the “International Social Security Administration”. Social Security is now in over 130 countries across the world, including all 1st world nations.
I’ll list here just a few of the court’s opinions as authorities under some “god” who claim ownership of your children as registered artificial persons (citizens) and as conveyed contractual property for those with residence in the United States (citizenship in Washington D.C.):
“Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties – the husband, the wife and the state.”–Appellate Court of Illinois, NO. 5-97-0108
“The primary control and custody of infants is with the government.” –Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62
“The court stands in the position of parens patria[e] of children.“ –Ayers v. Kelley, 284 Ala. 321, 224 So.2d 673 (1969)․
“”Parens patriae,” literally “parent of the country,” refers traditionally to role of state as sovereign and guardian of persons under legal disability.” –Ex parte Bayliss, 550 So.2d 986, 988 n. 1 (Ala.1989) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1003 (5th ed.1979)).
“The state has a wide range of power for limiting parental freedom and authority in things affecting the child’s welfare… In fact, the entire familial relationship involves the State.” –Prince, 321 U.S. at 167, 64 S.Ct. at 442, 88 L.Ed. 645.
“In other words, the state is the father and mother of the child and the natural parents are not entitled to custody, except upon the state’s beneficent recognition that natural parents presumably will be the best of its citizens to delegate its custodial powers… ‘The law devolves the custody of infant children upon their parents, not so much upon the ground of natural right in the latter, as because the interests of the children, and the good of the public, will, as a general rule, be thereby promoted.’ ” –Chandler v. Whatley, 238 Ala. 206, 208, 189 So. 751, 753 (1939) (quoting Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. at 89) (‘ ’).
Now consider this universal legal code of “residence”. The California Government Code in Section 243 simply states:
“243. Every person has, in law, a residence.”
Thus, this maxim of legalized slavery tells you that by declaring residence as a 14th amendment citizen of the United States, you are a registered slave of that entity. While you have domicile (live in property) in the State of California, you are a fictional “resident” of Washington D.C. and thus subject to its laws as surety.
How many times a day are we told that we are “subject” to the Federal laws of the Untied States?
SUBJECT, contracts. The thing which is the object of an agreement. This term is used in the laws of Scotland.
SUBJECT,persons, government. An individual member of a nation, who is subject to the laws; this term is used in contradistiction to citizen, which is applied to the same individual when considering his political rights. 2. In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch. Vide Body politic…
SUBJECTION. The obligation of one or more persons to act at the discretion, or according to the judgment and will of others. 2. Subjection is either private or public. By the former is meant the subjection to the authority of private persons; as, of children to their parents, of apprentices to their masters, and the like. By the latter (public) is understood the subjection to the authority of public persons.
SUBMISSION.A yielding to authority. A citizen is bound to submit to the laws; a child to his parents; a servant to his master. A victor may enforce, the submission of his enemy. 2. When a captor has taken a prize, and the vanquished have submitted to his authority, the property, as between the belligerents, has been transferred. When there is complete possession on one side, and submission upon the other, the capture is complete.
SUBMISSION,contracts. An agreement by which persons who have a law-suit or difference with one another, name arbitrators to decide the matter, and bind themselves reciprocally to perform what shall be arbitrated.
As a citizen in contract and residence within the United States, you own nothing, for a citizen is an artificial, legal, corporate thing. You are a surety under submission as a subject of that corporation through tacit agreement and presumed consent, and you are required to sumbit to what government arbitrates and calls statutory and prima fascie law.
SURETY, contracts. A person who binds himself for the payment of a sum of money or for the performance of something else, for another, who is already bound for the same. A surety differs from a guarantor, and the latter cannot be sued until after a suit against the principal. 2. The surety differs from bail in this, that the latter actually has, or is by law presumed to have, the custody of his principal, while the former (surety) has no control over him. The bail may surrender his principal in discharge of his obligation; the surety cannot be discharged by such surrender.
Your artificial person called a “citizen” is bound to the “public debt”.
And you are bound to that artificial person as a surety that the artificial person will pay the debt.
PLEDGE. In the law of bailment. A bailment of goods to a creditor as securityfor some debt or engagement. A bailment or delivery of goods by a debtor to his creditor, to be kept till the debt be discharged… The necessary elements to constitute a contract one of “pledge” are: Possession of the pledged property must pass from the pledgor to the pledgee; the legal title to the property must remain in the pledgor; and the pledgee must have a lien on the property for the payment of a debt or the performance of an obligation due him by the pledgor or some other person-while, in a “chattel mortgage,” the legal title passes to the mortgagee subject to a defeasance… A bailment of personal property as security for a debt or other obligation.–Black’s 4rth
PLEDGEE. The party to whom goods are pledged, or delivered in pledge.
PLEDGERY. Suretyship, or an undertaking or answering for another.
Social Security… or Social Pledge?
A Pledge of Allegiance… or a Pledge to be a subject to debt in submission as surety?
Why can government take your property and allow banks to do the same through the judicial decisions it makes enforced by the county Sheriff? Why its because your so-called “personal property” is a security for the debt and obligation of your strawman.
In order to bind a man to another without him or her knowing, government creates an artificial person (incorporation) without ever fully disclosing that dualistic Strawman (paperman) contractual identity to the man. And yet identity theft is rampant, where the identity of the artificial person is stolen and used by someone else in fraud, often without even the slightest knowledge of the living man that is its surety. And this specifically shows the difference between the real man and the artificial person – for the person can be taken away from the man. Citizenship can be revoked, and yet the man lives on… Identity theft is a federal crime because that artificial person and its Social Security number is the official property of the government, who contracts with the man and allows the man to use the property (person).
You are just a user of government property, including your name and number. For the name you use is government-owned through trust and domain. You are bound to perform on behalf of your corporate name as surety. And a man cannot have residence, only a 14th amendment citizen can, for the citizen is a contractual artificial person owned by government and leased to you. As soon as you are born and entered into contract (birth certificate and social) and according to Bouvier’s 1856, you might simply call yourself a citizen slave…
SLAVE. A man who is by law deprived of his liberty for life, and becomes the property of another. 2. A slave has no political rights, and generally has no civil rights. He can enter into no contract unless specially authorized by law; what he acquires generally, belongs to his master. The children of female slaves follow the condition of their mothers, and are themselves slaves. –Bouvier’s Law, 1856
This definition explains the average citizen’s disposition all too well:
(1) The 5th amendment allows government to deprive its citizens of life, liberty, and property with due process of its own law by the very courts who claim to own your children as property of the State above.
(2) Citizens have given up natural rights for contractual political/civil rights from government – in other words they accept in contractual servitude whatever rights their government grants them as slave/citizens. Note that civil rights are in no way whatsoever natural rights under God, but are a government granted status and privilege.
(3) The citizen can only enter into contracts allowed and authorized by government (law). If he incorporates, his corporation is a government corporation requiring his master’s (government’s) permission and license to do business and make contracts with other government corporations and persons. Without a license, a subjected citizen can do no business in the jurisdiction (residence) of the United States corporation.
(4) The Citizen’s “property” belongs to his master or “sovereign” – the government – through contractual citizenship and as collateral for the general currency, which he may utilize for user-only purposes as legal tender.
More on this later…
In other words, government is claiming to be a Holy church or temple; believing that it can somehow have god-like authority over all things through the use of its holy works, things, and articles (such as constitutions and contracts). It even accepts an oath to God as acceptance into its Order of the temple, as if God (or some god) granted it His authority Himself.
The fallacy of Americans is that this has happened over time, and that the original constitution was in fact somehow immune to all of this mental and contractual enslavement that we have today. And yet at the same time, even while we are all enslaved, Americans still want to protect the constitution – the very foundation of the government that enslaves them through debt and obligation. This oxymoron creates the irrational use of words like traitor and sacrilege…
SACRILEGE. In English criminal law. Larceny from a church. The crime of breaking a church or chapel, and stealing therein. In old English law. The desecration of anything considered holy; the alienation to laymen or to profane or common purposes of what was given to religious persons and to pious uses.
Remember, there was no separation of church and State in English law, thus the words laymen and religious persons both refer to politicians of the church and State.
SACRILEGUS. Lat. In the civil and common law. A sacrilegious person; one guilty of sacrilege.
–=–
“Receive my instruction, and not silver; and knowledge rather than choice gold.”
“For wisdom is better than rubies; and all the things that may be desired are not to be compared to it.”
—Proverbs 8:10-11 (KJB)
–=–
Ironically, the acceptance of the United States Dollar by Americans is akin to accepting silver, gold, and rubies in lieu of the knowledge and the wisdom that would otherwise set a people free from this theocracy’s debt induced contractual slavery of all its citizens. For the dollar is the root of the evils of monetary debt enslavement – a trust formed by evil money-changing men and certainly not by God or approved within the Bible.
And so I say unto the people of America, do you believe it to be sacrilege when I say what I have said? For if you do, then you must believe that I have stolen from or blasphemed your government as if it were a religion, church, or temple – as is the legal definition of the word sacrilege.
Do you believe that your government is your church? Your temple? Is it truly of God or just pretending? Can you really believe that everything it does is for the greater good as commissioned by That divine entity through its constitution, and that its sacred opinions and legal articles should not be questioned – just like any other religious institution and its dogma? And is this not the same belief of a typical member of a cult for its leaders – its leaders being the governing body of the cult (religion)?
Do you believe me to be guilty of sacrilege by defaming these corrupt but sacramental oath-taking politicians, their flag, and their corporation they call a country? If so, do you then somehow believe them Holy and thus justified in their completely corrupt actions? For you must be of the religion of the “Cult of the Constitution” to believe that I have just committed such an unholy alienation of your laymen as political figures; religious persons that even as you read this piously use their own statutory, sacred articles of law to corrupt everything you see for personal and empire profit and gain at your expense.
Are you brave and strong enough in your faithful resolve that the United States is a Christian nation that you may further challenge your belief by continuing with me on this journey? For if indeed it is not a Christian nation or not founded as such, should not God wish you to learn how to make it so – a nation bound only by the natural law of God and not the extraneous statutory legal atrocities of man against nature and God?
To be clear… I absolutely do desecrate, turn my back on, and do not consent to, accept, or acknowledge the legitimacy of this supposedly sacred temple of the Untied States and its Holy stranglehold over America and its people. And I invite you to keep reading to find out the whole truth… for any doubts or questions you might have thus far will likely be answered herein…
–=–
The Power Of God?
–=–
When we stop and consider for just a moment, we realize that all governments of the past and present derive their power from some form ofsacramentum – an oath under the supervision of some form of godor deity – and that the legal language and authority claimed has always been ecclesiastical in nature; ritually derived from a higher power. For if its power were truly derived from the common people it governs (controls), it would have no power over the common people at all – for the people could then just voluntarily say no to government any time they disagree with it. No police officer could crush their heads in without asking permission first.
Does this really sound logical or reasonable to you?
When we think of this “of, by, and for the people” propaganda, we realize that the whole concept is indeed ridiculous. For it would literally mean that the people are governing themselves, and that no edict, declaration, or law from government would ever have any authority over any of the individual people if they did not personally agree with it…
Perhaps if the people were each an individual Corporation Sole things might be different.
That is, unless the sacramentum is taken into consideration, where allegiance is not just ceremonial, but ecclesiastically binding upon a people who never even realize the nature of their pledge. For the ancient form of pledging has always been an integral part of the religious customs of corrupt governments acting as if they were God’s chosen incorporation on Earth.
ECCLESIASTICAL. Belonging to, or set apart for the church; as, distinguished from civil or secular. Vide Church.
ECCLESIASTICS, canon law. Those persons who compose the hierarchicalstate of the church. They are regular and secular.
ECCLESIASTIC. A clergyman; one destined to the divine ministry, as, a bishop, a priest, a deacon.
ECCLESIASTICAL LAW. By this phrase it is intended to include all those rules which govern ecclesiastical tribunals. Vide Law Canon.
ECCLESIASTICAL COURTS. English law. Courts(tribunals)held by the king’s authority as supreme governor of the church, for matters which chiefly concern religion…
When considering the Cannon law – Greek: kanon / κανών, Arabic: Qanon / قانون, Hebrew: kaneh / קנה, we must realize the Masonic origins of the Roman Catholic Church. Unfortunately, we must also understand that “Church’s” crusade against Christianity across the nations. For the ancient understanding of this word “Cannon” stems from the tools of that deistic Order of Masons, and is defined as “straight”; a rule, code, standard, or measure. The root meaning in each of these languages is the word “reed”, or the Romantic era English word for “cane”, another sacred symbol in Freemasonry.
As required viewing and for a more deep comprehension of the root nature of the Catholic Church and its true intent, please take the time to view this lecture. Understanding the symbols of Islam and Catholicism as one in the same religion and that both are opposed to true Christianity is of vital importance to comprehending the goal of world religions and Masonry, seeking to divide, conquer, then unify all men into one world religion.
Pardon the religious (Christian) overtones in the very beginning credits,
for the information presented thereafter is vital to our understanding.
It is hard to imagine that the Catholic Church (Jesuits)
created Islam to rid Europe, Africa, and the land in the Middle East
of un-governed Christianity and to control all occultism.
At around the 43 minute mark in this video, Walter tells you
of the setting up of World War 3 as a religious war between religions.
This is a preplanned war pitting Islam against Judea-Christianity (Zionism).
To this I attest and will ultimately show this reality is happening even as you read…
–=–
As referred to in this video lecture above, we see another example of the true nature of just what a constitution is and where in fact its origins lay. The following is literally a constitution to change and alter the laws (cannons) of the Roman Church with regards to the worship of Mary, altering the original Apostolic Constitutions from the Popes (government) in the 1400’s-1500’s.
In other words, this is an “amendment” to the “Constitution“.
–=–
The Immaculate Conception
“Ineffabilis Deus”
“Apostolic Constitution issued by Pope Pius IX on December 8, 1854.”
“Papal Sanctions”
“…So at the instance and request of the bishops mentioned above, with the chapters of the churches, and of King Philip and his kingdoms, we renew the Constitutions and Decrees issued by the Roman Pontiffs, our predecessors, especially Sixtus IV, Paul V, and Gregory XV, in favor of the doctrine asserting that the soul of the Blessed Virgin, in its creation and infusion into the body, was endowed with the grace of the Holy Spirit and preserved from original sin; and also in favor of the feast and veneration of the conception of the Virgin Mother of God, which, as is manifest, was instituted in keeping with that pious belief. So we command this feast to be observed under the censures and penalties contained in the same Constitutions.
Translation: Mary is God, and we’ll punish or kill you if you don’t agree.
“And therefore, against all and everyone of those who shall continue to construe the said Constitutions and Decrees in a manner apt to frustrate the favor which is thereby given to the said doctrine, and to the feast and relative veneration, or who shall dare to call into question the said sentence, feast and worship, or in any way whatever, directly or indirectly, shall declare themselves opposed to it under any pretext whatsoever, were it but only to the extent of examining the possibilities of effecting the definition, or who shall comment upon and interpret the Sacred Scripture, or the Fathers or Doctors in connection therewith, or finally, for any reason, or on any occasion, shall dare, either in writing or verbally, to speak, preach, treat, dispute or determine upon, or assert whatsoever against the foregoing matters, or who shall adduce any arguments against them, while leaving them unresolved, or who shall disagree therewith in any other conceivable manner, we hereby declare that in addition to the penalties and censures contained in the Constitutions issued by Sixtus IV to which we want them to be subjected and to which we subject them by the present Constitution, we hereby decree that they be deprived of the authority of preaching, reading in public, that is to say teaching and interpreting; and that they be also deprived ipso facto of the power of voting, either actively or passively, in all elections, without the need for any further declaration; and that also, ipso facto, without any further declaration, they shall incur the penalty of perpetual disability from preaching, reading in public, teaching and interpreting, and that it shall not be possible to absolve them from such penalty, or remove it, save through ourselves, or the Roman Pontiffs who shall succeed us.
“We also require that the same shall remain subject to any other penalties which by us, of our own free will — or by the Roman Pontiffs, our successors (according as they may decree) — shall be deemed advisable to establish, and by the present Constitution we declare them subject thereto, and hereby renew the above Decrees and Constitutions of Paul V and Gregory XV.”
–=–
Does this sound familiar?
…Believe in the validity of the U.S. Constitution without question or be ostracized and called or tried as treasonous.
The constitution, I hope it’s now plain to see, is not just the foundation of government but the foundation of all religions and cults that claim to be government.
Perhaps none in the church dare call it treason as opposed to sacrilege. But in this church and in the United States government, treason is exactly what is “unconstitutional”. For treason is to question the authority of the constitution, and the constitution is heaven sent.
Of course after the American Civil War, the treasonous (yet lawfully elected by the people) politicians of the Southern confederate states were banned from participating in the new holy government of the new United States and its new constitution with a replaced 13th amendment, and were subsequently replaced themselves by military officials of the Northern union. Never mind that the abandonment of congress by those states officially ended the Federal Government’s legitimacy stare decises.
ABANDON. To desert, surrender, forsake, or cede. To relinquish or give up with intent of never again resuming one’s right or interest. To give up or to cease to use. To give up absolutely; to forsake entirely; to renounce utterly; to relinquish all connection with or concern in; to desert. It includes the intention, and also the external act by which it is carried into effect. –Black’s 4rth Edition
The point here is that the idea of a constitution was nothing novel or new in America, and that the practice of constituting is much more ancient and Mysterious than the colonization of America, let alone the constitution of it into a debt compacted corporation. For the use of constitutions is and always has been a religious and secret societal ritual and custom, complete with sacrament oaths and holy incorporation. And to speak against such constitutions, as we read above, has always been tantamount to treason and sacrilege against God Himself.
And Holy Crusades and Holy “Civil Wars” (wars to force the civil law) follow constitutional history in all accounts.
Welcome to America…
Here is the memorial to the celebrated “Grand Army of the Republic”:
Why is it in the shape of a phallus (obelisk)?
More on this below…
Recognize the inverted 5-pointed star (pentagram)?
The eagle (phoenix) rising over the Masonic arch,
symbolized by cannons – rising out of destruction and
clasped to the corporate flag of the United States?
The inverse side of the metal.
Surprise, surprise… the crescent and the star, the five and six-pointed star, etc…
–=–
The Grand Army of the Republic was founded on April 6, 1866, on the principles of Masonic “Fraternity, Charity and Loyalty,” in Decatur Illinois, by Benjamin F. Stephenson. It grew into a de facto (illegitimate) political arm of the Republican Party during the Reconstruction Era with over 400,000 members. The 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments are considered “reconstruction amendments”.
Ironically, a republic with an “standing” army is against the nature of a republic, especially one who conquers nations like the confederacy to force them to be under the constitution of the United States. The fallacy that the United States is an actual “republic” (a word not mentioned in the constitution) will be covered in a later section.
–=–
It is the very ritualistic nature of these mega-church-and-state religions/governments like Catholicism that should give us the first clue that something is most certainly wrong with their claims of following Christ’s teachings. For ritual and ceremony take us away from our appreciation of God as nature and its laws, making us subjects of the man-made laws (Canons) of the government of the Church.
Ancient of Days by William Blake, 1794
(Sun) God with his Masonic Compass at His creation of Earth…
–=–
“…when he set a compass upon the face of the depth (earth).”
—Proverbs 8:27, (Christian and Hebrew Bibles)
–=–
“Elaborate ritual and ceremony, which theoretically are designed to aid the worshiper,
usually have the opposite effect in that they tend to take the mind away from things
which are spiritual and eternal and to center it on that which is material and temporal.
Artistic ritual… often become ends in themselves, and can easily become instruments
which prevent the people from joining in the worship of God…”
–Lorraine Boettner, ‘Roman Catholicism’ (p. 273)
–=–
“Ritualism is the highway to Rome.”
–J.C. Ryle, ‘What do we owe to the Reformation?’
–=–
“The Blue Lodge Mason is taught that the “G” in the basic Masonic symbol
represents God. Later on, he is told that it represents “deity”.
Later still, he is told that it represents “geometry”.
In reality, this letter represents the “generative principle,” the Sun-god
and, thus,the worshiped phallus, the male “generative principle…”
“In its position (along with the square and compass) on the east wall over
the chair (throne) of the Worshipful Master, it is the representation of the Sun,
|thus of the Sun-god, Osiris. Its earthly meaning, then, is of the sacred phallus;
its cosmic meaning is of the Sun, worshiped since antiquity
by pagans while facing the East.”
Ex-33 degree Mason Jim Shaw, ‘The Deadly Deception’
–=–
“The Bible is an indispensable part of the furniture of a Christian (Masonic) Lodge, because it is the sacred book of the Christian religion. The Hebrew Pentateuch in a Hebrew Lodge, and a Koran in a Mohammedan one, belong on the Alter; and one of these and a Square and Compass, properly understood, are the Great Lights by which a Mason must walk and work.”
–Albert Pike, ‘Morals and Dogma’, Page 11.
–=–
And those Deists who swear an oath (sacramentum) falsely on the Bible but swear to some other deity or god are not at all concerned about shaming the One in that Holy book. For the ceremony of sacramentum is not a Christian tenet, but the ritual of those who are anti-Christian. Masonic ritual is indeed admitted to be against the Bible and its story of Christ, as we will learn.
–=–
“The Holy Book must be opened upon the altar before a Masonic Lodge may be opened. Freemasonry is not concerned with doctrine or dogma or sect or denomination, but only with “thatnatural religion in which all men agree.” Therefore, the Holy Book is called the V.S.L. or Volume of Sacred Law or the Book of the Law. If the members of a Lodge are Christian, Moslem, Jewish or Buddhist, the V.S.L. of their particular belief is opened upon their altar. The V.S.L. is, therefore, a symbol of the revealed will and teachings of the Great Architect of the Universe – a name under which any Freemason canworship that Deity in Whom he puts his faith and trust… Masonic dates are written “A.L.” for “Anno Lucis” or “In the year of Light” which is 4000 years plus the current year. i.e. the year 2001 written Masonically would be 6001. This is because the practice has followed the ancient belief that the world was created when God said “Let there be light”, 4000 years before Christ.“
—‘One Hundred One Questions about Freemasonry’Masonic Service Association, 1955.
–=–
And what great teachings were stated about and within the art of Masonry BEFORE CHRIST (B.C.) – to be done within the society to fellow masters of the craft without applying to or protecting the goyim and common man?
–=–
“A man should abstain from doing unto others what he would
not they should do unto him; and this is called the principle of acting on the square.”
–‘Great Learning’, 500 B.C.
–=–
“A master Mason, in teaching his apprentices, makes use of
the compasses and the square. Ye who are engaged in the pursuit of Wisdom,
must also make use of the compasses and the square.”
–Mencius, in China, around 300 B.C.
–=– The Canon Is Loaded –=–
We can see the law of Canons throughout all major religions, all incorporating their political governments under these laws through their sacrament constitutions. These contractual constitutions, even as they pretend to be opposed to one another, all pledge allegiance to the same corporation of Church and State, not to God or the people.
The most common misconception with the people of America is that the constitution of the United States gives individual rights to man. But the constitution only gives the government rights and then limits those rights, for the constitution was not voted on by and was not ever for the common people. Again, people came before the constitution, and derive the natural rights from God/nature. No man derives a right from any paper that is not issued and granted by permissive acceptance through contract by government. Thus, the people consent to the unnatural political rights provided and granted by the government, while government takes its political right to assign those rights from its founding constitution and the legislation it passes.
Again, a constitution only gives rights to an incorporated body politic, not to natural men. A natural man cannot use political rights any more than his corporate artificial person can claim natural rights.
But the constitution does allow for government to bestow and revoke privileges and benefits to those people who take its mark (number) through the statutory legislative process.
When in history a country and its government (a political corporation) was newly created, expanding the land and empire of the international theocratic society of bloodline kings who funded those new government ventures, they were all started by constitutinga compact of debt of allegiance to that Monarchy, which was called a “constitution”. In the United States, the people were taxed and indentured from their labors and estates, because those estates were of England and its Divine Rite through subjection. Thus, the men who came to America always claimed their rights as Englishmen under the Crown of England and not at all independent from that kingdom and its rule, which of course acted with God’s authority (permission).
As it turns out, everything that our “Founding Fathers” did in their Declaration of Independence was specifically to preserve their “natural-born rights as Englishmen“, which was in fact a perfectly legal pursuit as a crown colony.
We must discover what this dualistic word independence actually means:
INDEPENDENCE. A state of perfect irresponsibility to any superior; the United States are free and independent of all earthly power. 2. Independence may be divided into political and natural independence. By the former (political independence) is to be understood that we have contracted no tieexcept those which flow from the three great natural rights ofsafety, liberty and property. The latter (natural independence) consists in the power of being able to enjoy a permanent well-being, whatever may be the disposition of those from whom we call ourselves independent. In that sense a nation may be independent with regard to most people, but not independent of the whole world. —Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856
But let’s not forget… England was not just an “Earthly Power”, for it was ordained by the authority of God. Thus a natural independence literally could not exist at that time, as the King was God incarnate, and God was nature.
It is also important to point out the following, which lead to many other such constitutions in the colonies:
In Hartford, Connecticut, the first constitution in the American colonies, called the “Fundamental Orders,” is adopted by representatives of Wethersfield, Windsor, and Hartford.
The Dutch discovered the Connecticut River in 1614, but English Puritans from Massachusetts largely accomplished European settlement of the region. During the 1630s, they flocked to the Connecticut valley from the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and in 1638 representatives from the three major Puritan settlements in Connecticut met to set up a unified government for the new colony.
Roger Ludlow, a lawyer, wrote much of the Fundamental Orders, and presented a binding and compact frame of government that put the welfare of the community above that of individuals. It was also the first written constitution in the world to declare the modern idea that “the foundation of authority is in the free consent of the people.” In 1662, the Charter of Connecticut superseded the Fundamental Orders; though the majority of the original document’s laws and statutes remained in force until 1818.
The word charter, as in the “Charter of Connecticut”, was just the next constitution. It was an amended version of the first. And of course the Articles of Confederation were the constitution until the U.S. constitution replaced it. So to claim that the 1789 constitution was original or unique is patently false. It simply set up and chartered “govern-ment” control of the people. And it was again replaced after the civil war, though made to look the same, to attempt to legitimize a replacement de facto government under military rule..
What did Thomas Jefferson have to say about the Declaration of Independence? Only that…
“…an appeal to thetribunal of the world was deemed proper for our justification. This was the object of the Declaration of Independence. Not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take. Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing, it was intended to be an expression of the American mind, and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion. All its authority rests then on the harmonizing sentiments of the day, whether expressed in conversation, in letters, printed essays, or in the elementary books of public right, as Aristotle, Cicero, Locke, Sidney, &c..” –Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to Henry Lee on May 8, 1825
And of course as a mere “declaration”, this document had absolutely no legal authority. It was just a poetic “justification” for the creation of a debt compact for a central government called the U.S. constitution. It might as well have simply been an op-ed in the local newspaper, but is instead cherished as God-sent. And yet the tenets of the constitution, in case you haven’t noticed, are inherently opposed to the ones in the Declaration. The declaration talks about natural rights whereas the constitution sets up political ones, and political rights are always unnecessary unless their goal is to trample upon natural rights. And this “trick” of using some cause to justify tyrannies and more government has been used by that “constituted” government ever since.
As for just what is political independence, this is more difficult to grasp.
In the United States, for instance, our government has created many independent agencies of government. The Post Office, the Social Security Department, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Federal Reserve System are all independent agencies of government. Remember that the word of means belonging to. These are all political agencies of government, given the power by congress to make rules and act independently of day to day oversight of that congress. But in no way are they not agencies of government. They are politically independent but certainly not naturally so. And just like Congress, the King of England and the Crown’s world empire at the time simply did not have time or ability to govern America from his throne in England. Thus each nation within the kingdom was allowed to partially govern itself (to make its own rules) while still being subjected to the laws and tithing (debt) of the Crown Temple of England.
In this way, the corporation of the United States was and is politically independent, while still run (governed) by the blood relations and great grandsons of that same King listed in the Declaration of Independence.
Do you really believe you have a “choice” in these United States family elections?
–=–
“The presidential candidate with the most royal genes and
chromosomes has, up to now, always won the White House…”
–Burke’s Peerage researchers
–=–
“[Bush] is closely related to every European Monarch
both on and off the throne… Not one member of his family was
working class, middle class, or even middle, middle class…”
“Believe it or not, Mitt Romney and George W. Bush
are cousins — 10th cousins, twice removed, that is.”
“Romney is actually related to six past presidents — more than any other 2012 GOP contestant. Franklin D. Roosevelt
is his eighth cousin, twice removed,and both Calvin Coolidge and
Herbert Hoover are his 10th cousins.Then there is his
sixth cousin (four times removed) Franklin Pierce, and both 10th cousins Bush I and II. Three out of these six were even (gasp!) Democrats.”
“Obama and Palin are 10th cousins through a common ancestor
named John Smith… As for [Rush] Limbaugh, he’s also a
10th cousin of the president – one time removed…”
“President George W. Bush? He’s related to both Obama and Palin,
the site found.Obama and Bush are 11th cousins through
common ancestor Samuel Hinckley,and Bush and Palin are
10th cousins one time removed, also through Hinckley – who, and stay with us now, was John Smith’s father-in-law.”
“Obama is related to investor Warren Buffett and actor Brad Pitt.”
“Palin, the former Alaska governor and Republican
vice presidential candidate, is a distant cousin of
both Franklin D. Roosevelt and Princess Diana.”
“In 2007, Cheney’s wife, Lynne, discovered ancestral ties between former Vice President Dick Cheney and Obama while researching
her book.She said the relationship was eighth cousin…”
“Palin is distant cousins with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and conservative author and pundit Ann Coulter…”
“[Bush’s] royal kin include Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen Mother, Duchess Sarah “Fergy” Ferguson and even the late Princess Diana. His most prominent ancestor may be England’s King Charles II”
“Bill Clinton and Bob Dole have more in common than
wanting to be president. They are distant cousins!
However, Clinton has bluer blood, giving him an election edge”
“Bill Clinton was born William Jefferson Blythe, but took his
stepfather’s name as a teenager.Clinton’s ancestry can be traced back,
on his mother’s side, to King Henry IIIwho ruled England
from 1227 to 1272. He is descended from King Robert I of France.
Furthermore, he is related to every Scottish monarch to the
current British royal family…Clinton is related to
every ancient aristocratic family in Britain today.”
“As for John Kerry, “the 60-year-old can trace his roots back
to the first Massachusetts governor,John Winthrop,
to every great family in Boston and to a host of royals in Europe. Kerry can almost certainly be traced back to King James I
and to the bloodlinesstraight through the Windsor and
Hanover families,” Brooks-Baker said.“ But both candidates
have a remarkable number of royal connections
and both are related to Queen Elizabeth.”
Anyone reading this who claims the fact that all presidents of the United States are direct descendants of the Plantagenet kings of England, including Obama, is just a coincidence or some silly degree of separation, then you may as well stop reading and go back to the enter-tain-ment that govern-ment provides as a service to its subjects right now.
But why were the bloodline colonists of America even to this day so interested in retaining their English-born rights ordained by the Church (Canons) to rule the common man?
Because that’s where their inherent and inseparable divine right and rite to rule under God comes from!
Samuel Adams wrote in 1772:
“All persons born in the British American Colonies are, by the laws of God and nature and by the common law of England, exclusive (subjects) of all charters from the Crown, well entitled, and by acts of the British Parliament are declared to be entitled, to all the natural, essential, inherent, and inseparable rights, liberties, and privileges of subjects born in Great Britain or within the realm. –The Rights of the Colonists: The Report of the Committee of Correspondence to the Boston Town Meeting, Nov. 20, 1772.
Resolution #2 of the Declaration of Rights of the Stamp Act Congress on October 19, 1765, was written:
“That His Majesty’s liege subjects in these colonies are entitled to all the inherent rights and privileges of his natural born subjects within the kingdom of Great Britain.“
The “Charter of Massachusetts Bay (colony)” issued by the king in 1629 proclaimed that the people of the colony:
…shall have and enjoy all liberties and Immunities of free and naturall Subjects within any of the Domynions ofUs, our Heires or Successors, to all Intents, Constructions, and Purposes whatsoever, as if they and everie of them were borne within the Realme of England.
And today, Americans claim rights from a paper constitution chartered and paid for by Britain and Her subjects who rule by blood relation to that Crown Temple. And like fools we call this independence and freedom.
The colonists who came to America wanted nothing more than and in fact insisted upon being treated as natural-born Englishmen with all rights and privileges thereof and under the king but in the King’s land of America. This was reflected in every facet of the New America (New England). And it is part of the basis of the falsity of sentiment of the time in the term God-given natural rights, as the “king” was considered to be of “God” – the “divine” right of kings – under which rights were granted to the King’s (God’s) subjects.
Today, the people still believe that the constitution is divine, and that like the divine rite of kings, somehow that divine constitution gives them rights over and despite God and nature.
Perhaps it is easier to understand the sentiment of the time towards breaking away from that kingdom of Britain by the actual people of the colonies if we consider the sentiment of the people of the Untied States today being forced into the international body politic of the United Nations and excepting its own “constitution” – The International Declaration of Human Rights. This is the incremental process of constitutionalism that for centuries has conquered nations, America included. Our leaders tell us its good to be a member of the U.N. just as the same bloodline Masons and cousins of our current government told the colonists back in the late 1780’s that membership in the “United States” as a “federation” under a “constitution” was good for them. And though the people still believe that their rights are derived from the constitution that founded the United States instead of realizing they come from God (nature) and that a constitution is opposed to natural rights, they are being dragged into that United Nations as their new sovereign world government without a fight, like sheep to the slaughter. And the people of the United States of America who fight in the military are now fighting not to preserve the United States of America, but to preserve the transference of America into that international government even when it is against their best interests. For the United States military is now the “peace-keeping” military of the world, attacking all manner of nations around the world to ensure United Nations world governance friendly governments can be constituted throughout all the world’s people. This is the cause used to declare the right to constitute new govern-ments and charter new debt compacts (constitutions) all across the world. And the people, as with the colonists, blindly follow their Masonic leaders and died for their causes, most believing that their actions were ordained by God Himself. And they never comprehend that all the world is just a stage, and that these wars are all funded by the same central government that has always controlled (governed) the minds of men through ritual and ceremony.
–=–
“Every Masonic lodge is a temple of religion; and its teachings are instruction in religion… Masonry, like all religions, all the Mysteries, Hermeticism and Alchemy, conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead… to conceal the Truth, which it calls Light, from them, and to draw them away from it… The truth must be kept secret, and the masses need a teaching proportioned to their imperfect reason… every man’s conception of God must be proportioned to his mental cultivation, and intellectual powers, and moral excellence. God is, as man conceives him, the reflected image of man himself… The true name of Satan, the Kabalists say, is that of Yahveh reversed; for Satan is not a black god… Lucifer, the Light Bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light… Doubt it not!”
–Albert Pike, Morals And Dogma
–=–
This process of Masonic constitutionalism that thus formed the new corporation of the United States can be seen not only in the founding of most other political governments, but also in the religions/churches that prop them up.
For instance, the Protestant Episcopal Church was incorporated into the United States in the year 1789, just months after the United States was created through its own legal constitution. Of course a constitution, as we will soon learn, is actually a pledge to another entity – in this case a pledge as a member of the See of Canterbury by this United States corporation of religion – and was a pledge of allegiance and of financial responsibility to fund and support the crown of England as head of that church.
And none dare call it treason…
The Archbishop of Canterbury is the senior primate and chief religious figure of the Church of England (where the current queen Elizabeth II is the British sovereign and Supreme governor of the church). The Archbishop chairs the General Synod, sits or chairs many of the church’s important boards and committees, and plays a central part in national ceremonies such as coronations – the anointment of Monarchs to God-like (Christos) status. As holder of one of the “five great sees” (the others being York, London, Durham, and Winchester), the Archbishop of Canterbury is ex officio (by virtue of that office) one of the Lords Spiritual of the House of Lords. He is one of the highest-ranking men in England and the highest ranking non-royal in the United Kingdom’s order of precedence. Since Henry VIII broke with Rome, the Archbishops of Canterbury have been selected by the English (British since the Act of Union in 1707) monarch. Today the choice is made in the name of the monarch by the prime minister, from a shortlist of two selected by an ad-hoc committee called the Crown Nominations Commission.
Here is the preamble of the constitution for the Episcopal Church that was formed in the United States:
–=–
Constitution & Canons
Together with the Rules of Order
For the government of the Protestant Episcopal Church
in the United States of America
Otherwise Known as
The Episcopal Church
PREAMBLE – The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, otherwise known as The Episcopal Church (which name is hereby recognized as also designating the Church), is a constituent member of the Anglican Communion, a Fellowship within the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, of those duly constituted Dioceses, Provinces, and regional Churches in communion with the See of Canterbury, upholding and propagating the historic Faith and Order as set forth in the Book of Common Prayer. This Constitution, adopted in General Convention in Philadelphia in October, 1789, as amended in subsequent General Conventions, sets forth the basic Articles for the government of this Church, and of its overseas missionary jurisdictions.
–=–
Philadelphia… the “City of Brotherly Love”.
Here we see that even though the Protestent and Catholic churches are split and seemingly opposed in many respects, it was constituted in allegiance and debt with the central Church and State under the canons of ancient Masonic Roman law.
And let’s face it, the Church of England is simply the Church of Rome with divorce allowed – the purpose for thenHenry the VIII as King of England in making the illusion of division in the first place. There was no war, no fight, not even a skirmish between this separation. Not like when America declared independence form England. Go figure…
Of course Bloody Mary subsequently reinstated the Catholic Church while burning folks at the stake in its name, but then it was abolished again. What a lovely history.
The term re-in-state should be an obvious indication that the church is the state no matter what banner it flies or Bible it pretends to rule with.
The meme in America that the constitution of the United States is unique, original, special, inherent, organic, good, or even that it is the “law of the land” is a result of the lack of knowledge as to just what a constitution actually is… a compact of indebtedness and thus allegiance to another. In essence, a constitution is nothing more than the “Articles of Incorporation” or a “charter”. In fact, I’m positive that the reader has often heard the constitution referred to in America as the “Charter for Freedom”.
Now, remembering that Bouvier’s Law Dictionary of 1856 was commissioned and officially accepted by government, let’s find out what a constitution really is:
CONSTITUTION – contracts. The constitution of a contract, is the making of the contract as, the written constitution of a debt.
CONSTITUTOR – civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation.
CONSTITUENT – He who gives authority to another to act for him.
TO CONSTITUTE – contracts. To empower, to authorize. In the common form of letters of attorney, these words occur, “I nominate, constitute and appoint.”
CONSTITUIMUS – A Latin word which signifies we constitute. Whenever the king of England is vested with the right of creating a new office, he must use proper words to do so, for example, erigimus, constituimus…
And just what is an attorney anyway?
From Black’s Law 4rth:
ATTORN. To turn over; to transfer to another money or goods; to assign to some particular use or service. To consent to the transfer of a rent or reversion. To agree to become tenant to one as owner or landlord of an estate previously held of another, or to agree to recognize a new owner of a property or estate and promise payment of rent to him.
ATTORNARE. Latin. To attorn; to transfer or turn over; to appoint an attorney or substitute.
ATTORNATUS. One who is attorned, or put in the place of another; a substitute; hence, an attorney.
ATTORNE. Latin. French. In old English law. An attorney.
ATTORNEY. In the most general sense this term denotes an agent or substitute, or one who is appointed and authorized to act in the place or stead of another. An agent, or one acting on behalf of another. One who is put in place, stead, and turn of another to manage his matters of law. An agent employed by party to case to manage it for him.
Now do you understand? Do you see anywhere that a constitution gives the people any rights? Do you understand now that a constitution is a debt contract giving authority through attorn-ment (turning over the mind) to government to act on your behalf (power of attorney), even against your best interests?
Need more proof? Let’s take a look at the constitution…
Article 6 of the constitution states very clearly that the United States was constituted as a debtor nation:
“All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.”
There was never independence if this country was founded in Debt and Engagement to England and France.
We know what the word Debt means, but what about the word Engagements?
ENGAGEMENT. This word is frequently used in the French law to signify not only a contract, but the obligations arising from a quasi contract. The terms obligations and engagements, are said to be synonymous; but the Code seems specially to apply the term engagement to those obligations which the law, imposes on a man without the intervention of any contract, either on the part of the obligor or the obligee.
In the case of the United States, the constitution specifically notes here that the debts and obligations of contract owed to other nations at the signing of that constitution were still valid (to France and Great Britain). Ironically, the great American dream has been promoted in very much the same way, where mortgage, college, and credit debt (loan) contracts are somehow the way to be a free people.
And have you ever considered that “freedom” of religion means protection of all religions, including Lucifarian, Demonology, the Church of Satan, Atheism, and of course most importantly the Deism of Free and Accepted Masonry and other government approved secret societies and cults?
And the people have a choice:
Be debt free and free men as a non-citizens…
Or accept citizenship where debt slavery is surety to the government granted privilege of freedom.
In reality, the term Debt is freedom could not be a more true statement. For government grants freedom as a privilege to its subjects without them even knowing it is a privilege; one not being derived from a natural right. Remember the dollar and its trust of god? The word freedom is perhaps the most misused, misunderstood word in the history of all words. Freedom is actually defined as the positive (forced) right to obey the government’s sacred articles of law.
A political or positive right is the right to have something forced upon you by the lawmaker.
While a negative or natural right is the right to NOT ever have anything forced upon you.
Free = outside of man’s law, in harmony with nature under God.
Freedom = obey the law of man.
Man’s law = pay your debt, be subject, obey, or else.
This definition (freedom = obedience to government law) can be found in any legal dictionary that you might read. We will certainly define legally the word freedom later in this presentation as we walk through the many fallacies of the constitution and the United States. For being free in nature and having government-granted freedom are two completely opposite ideas; directly opposed to one another. A positive right inherently and necessarily cancels out a negative right, just as man has attempted to conquer nature itself.
Read my in depth essay on this subject, an integral understanding of the duality of what a right really is, here:
The political laymen in their pious deliberations of law among those within the law society conduct their business in arched temples designed after the Holy Roman Empire and based on the Sacred Geometry of Freemasonry – the Mystery Religions. And all of those ancient symbols abound and adorn those government temples (see pictures throughout this essay). And they use the Holy Bible as a symbolic prop (furniture) to fool the people while swearing the sacra-ment oath to their own Masonic Deity that cares not about the Bible… other than to recognize it and “Christianity” as a “problem” for the Masonic constitution and rule.
Republican Rome has been a model for most major governments around the world, requiring that all laws go (pass) through two legislative bodies. It is also outlined in almost every “democratic” constitution that created new nations. In fact, Thomas Jefferson intended for some of his buildings to resemble the Roman temples, which he described as “one of the most beautiful, if not the most beautiful and precious morsel of architecture left us by antiquity.”
–=–
**Note that the Egyptian obelisk is a phallic symbol
worshiping the god Osiris and sun god Ra, and in less
common understanding denotes “Baal” worship.
–=–
“…the linham [male phallus] was an upright pillar.”
–W.Wynn Wescott, ‘Numbers: Their Occult Power and Mystic Virtues’, Theosophical Publishing Society, 1902, p.33
–=–
Solar Temple of Nyuserr, Abusir, L’Archelologie Egypteinne,
Drawing, Gaston Maspero, 1907
Obelisk in New York’s Central Park
Obelisk in Paris, France
Cleopatras Needle (obelisk) in London by dome
The Washington Monument obelisk
in a circle of flags.
–=–
“The Washington Monument, which lies directly west of the Capitol, is an obelisk, a tall, four-sided stone pillar tapering toward a pyramidal top. Some people believe that this is the most significant occult symbol of all. Most people are aware that an obelisk is Egyptian in origin, but few know the story behind it, and fewer still that it is an important Masonic symbol. In fact, the four obelisks which sit in four major Western cities, Paris, London, New York, and Washington, D.C., were erected specifically because of the efforts of, and large sums of money donated by, prominent and powerful nineteenth century Freemasons.”
–Michael Bradley Ph.D, ‘Secrets of the Freemasons’, ch. 8, p. 163, 2006
–=–
“King Jehu said to the guards and to the officers, ‘Go in and slay them; let none escape’. And they smote them with the sword; and the guards before the king threw their bodies out, and went into the inner dwelling of the house of Baal. They brought out the obelisks [pillars] of the house of Baal and burned them.”
–2 Kings 10:26, (Amplified Bible)
–=–
“You shall make for your self no idols nor shall you erect a graven image,
pillar, or obelisk, nor shall you place any figured stone in your land
to which or on which to bow down; for I Am The Lord your God”.
–Leviticus 26:1 (Amplified Bible)
–=–
“Now when all this was finished, all Israel present there went out to the cities of
Judah and broke in pieces the pillars or obelisks, cut down the asherim,
and threw down the high places [of idolatry] and the altars in all Judah and Benjamin,
in Ephraim and Manasseh, until they had utterly destroyed them all”.
–2 Chronicles 31:1 (Amplified Bible)
(The “asherim” signify the “asherah poles”.)
–=–
Stone obelisk marking the grave of U.S. President James Madison,
the nation’s fourth president and father of the U.S. Constitution.
President Thomas Jefferson’s obelisk grave-site
–=–
“Before his death, Thomas Jefferson left specific instructions for a monument
to be constructed on his grave site. In reference to the words to be
placed on his gravestone, Jefferson said,‘On the faces of the Obelisk the following inscription, & not a word more.’1 He continued by writing, ‘because by these, as testimonials that I have lived, I wish most to be remembered.’“
President Millard Fillmore Grave with pink obelisk
Obelisk commemorating the history of Morrow County
“WARREN G. HARDING — Morrow County’s favorite son”
Grave-site of President Warren G. Harding
–=–
“No man ever took the oaths and subscribed to the obligations with greater watchfulness and care than I exercised in receiving the various rites of Masonry, and I say with due deliberation and without fear of breaking the faith. I have never encountered a lesson, never witnessed an example, never heard an obligation uttered which could not be openly proclaimed to the world.”
–President of the United States, Warren G. Harding.
–=–
President Martin Van Buren’s Grave-site
President Andrew Johnson’s Grave with veiled obelisk
President Franklin Peirce’s obelisk grave marker
And on and on…
–=–
“The Masonic Burial”
Image from Masonic Family Magazine, 1878
–=–
“The obelisk is the most commonly used and the most blatant occult symbol used throughout the world. In ancient Egypt, the cult of this phallic symbol was associated with the god Osiris, who was cut in 13 pieces by Seth. Isis traveled far and beyond to retrieve all of Osiris’ body parts and was successful, except for one body part, the penis, which was swallowed by a fish. ‘The lost phallus’ is thus representative of male energy, and is almost always placed inside a circle, which represents female genitalia and energy. The obelisk in the middle of a circle represents the sexual act and the union of opposite forces. In our modern world, obelisks are found on nearly all important landmarks, and thus became and symbol of the occult elite’s power.”
An obelisk in Vermont marking the birthplace of Mormon founder
and president Joseph Smith, cousin of L. Ron Hubbard and George Bush.
In Vermont, the innocent nature of members (the people) within the
Mormon Church can be seen as they celebrate Christ’s birth in front
of the phallic Egyptian obelisk commemorating the birth of Joseph Smith.
Other leaders and presidents of the Mormon corporation that have obelisks as
tombstones include John Taylor, Lorenzo Snow, Hyrum Smith, and others.
“This white obelisk, dedicated in July 1921, served as the first
permanent marker erected to commemorate the arrival of
the Mormon pioneers into the Salt Lake Valley in 1847.”
–Utah State Historical Society
–=–
Seventh Day Adventist Church
Bella Vista Mayaguez, Puerto Rico
Battle Creek, Michigan Grave-site of Ellen G. White (Seventh-Day Adventist “Prophet”)
and her husband James White (President of Seventh Day Adventist General Conferences)
–=–
“My accompanying angel presented before me some of the errors
of those present, and also the truth in contrast with their errors.”
Grave-site of J.N. Andrews in Basil. Switzerland
Seventh-day Adventist Church founder and also the 3rd elected President of the SDA
General Conference, editor of the Review and Herald (1869-1870) now the Adventist Review
Grave of Adventist pioneer E.L.H. Chamberlain, Middletown Cn
John Thomas, Founder of Chrisadelphians cult
“The Christadelphians have been with us since about 1848. They rose up after the Mormons, but prior to the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Seventh-day Adventists. A man named John Thomas founded the group. The Disciples of Christ denomination attempted to discipline this man for his “strange doctrines,” but the discipline was not accepted by him. John Thomas drew off his own followers under their original name, the Royal Association of Believers in New York, now known as the Christadelphians.”
— Article from Jubilee International Inc. website
Jane Addams Memorial Park in Chicago, Illinois
founder of the Woman’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF)
and first US woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize (1931).
Her husband was the Founder of the Illinois Republican Party.
Dorothy De Rothschild Grove,
at the Israel Supreme Court
Baroness Philippine Mathilde Camille de Rothschild
(Rothschild Banking Family)
Here she is shown confidently showcasing her Lucifarian jewelry,
with her Satan and Baphomet (goat) Necklaces.
American Baptist Theological Seminar
Nashville, Tn
Grave of Charles Wesley, composer of over 8,000 hymns,
whose brother John Wesley founded Methodism.
Grave-site of John Wesley, founder of Methodism
–=–
“The spires and pinnacles with which our old churches are decorated indeed, all uprights, including all the architectural families, and the varieties of tors, towers, and steeples, the especial mark and glory of Christian building, come from these ancient symbols. They are everywhere indicative of the Phallus, or index-finger denoting the “Fire”, the aspiring fire, against the inclination of gravity, which was the first vitalized idea, or Idol, worshiped magically and philosophically, the enlivening, godlike Power.”
–Hargrave Jennings (1817-1890), British Freemason, Rosicrucian and author on occultism and esotericism, “Phallicism: Celestial and Terrestrial; Heathen and Christian and its Connection with the Rosicrucian and the Gnostics and its foundation in Buddhism”, (p. 72, 1884)
–=–
Church of Christ in Sarasota, Fl
Seventh-Day Adventist Headquarters in Singapore
–=–
“You shall have no other gods before me.
You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in
heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below.
You shall not bow down to them or worship them…”
–Exodus 20:3-6 (NIV)
–=–
“Man descended from the elemental Forces or Titans [Elohim], who fed on the body of the Pantheistic Deity creating the Universe by self-sacrifice, commemorates in sacramental observance this mysterious passion; and while partaking of the raw flesh of the victim, seems to be invigorated by a fresh draught from the fountain of universal life, to receive a new pledge of regenerated existence. Death is the inseparable antecedent of life; the seed dies in order to produce the plant, and earth itself is rent asunder and dies at the birth of Dionusos (Dionysus). Hence the significance of the phallus, or of its inoffensive substitute, theobelisk, rising as an emblem of resurrection by the tomb of buried Deity at Lerna or at Sais… And in this sense, as presiding over live and death, Dionusos is in the highest sense the LIBERTATOR (Liberty): since, like Osiris, he frees the soul and guides it in its migrations beyond the grave, preserving it from the risk of falling under the slavery of matter or some inferior animal form…”
–Albert Pike, ‘Morals and Dogma’, page 393, 1872
–=–
“But it was Solomon who built the house for him.
However, the Most High does not live in houses made by men.”
–Acts 7: 47-51 (NIV)
–=–
“The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of
heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands.
And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything,
because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else.”
–Acts 17:24-25 (NIV)
–=–
This Egyptian obelisk was shipped from Heliopolis to Rome by Emperor Caligula in 37 C.E. Pope Sixtus V had Domenico Fonana move it in 1586 to the center of St. Peter’s Square at the Vatican, where it sits to this present day by the dome.
–=–
“The lost phallus’ is thus representative of male energy, and is almost always placed (as in this case) inside a circle…”
–=–
The U.S. Capital Dome near Washington Monument obelisk
The Dome of the Capital building in Washington D.C. shows Freemason George Washington surrounded by “Liberty” and “Victory” in the clouds, as well as 13 heavenly maidens with stars above their heads. This fresco, painted by Constantino Brimidi in 1865, displays these goddesses holding the banner of E Pluribus Unem, supposedly representing the 13 colonies as “many united as one”.
–=–
Just what the 5-pointed star actually represents in ancient Masonic sacred geometry will be revealed later in this presentation.
Dome of the Rock, Israel
(former Plantagenet British Kingdom of Jerusalem lost in 1200’s)
(Pagan) Pantheon of Hadrian with similar Dome.
Parthenon in Athens
United State Supreme Court Building
Statues of Confucius, Moses, and Solon adorn one of
the archways of the U.S. Supreme Court Building.
Is the United States a Confucian-Judea-Solonian Nation?
Coast Guard Memorial, Arlington National Cemetery –
The pyramid is the tip of the obelysk.
Statue of Orpheus that honors Francis Scott Key.
Why Orpheus?
Orpheus (Ὀρφεύς) was a legendary musician, poet, and prophet
in Greek mythology. Orpheus had the ability to charm all living things
and even stones with his music. He was a founder and prophet of
the “Orphic mysteries” and supposed composer of the Orphic Hymns.
In other words… he entered and held the minds of those who heard his music.
So too does the nationalistic patriotism of Francis Scott Key’s
Masonic poem “The Star Spangled Banner”, when orchestrated and sung.
Enter-tain-ent for the governed…
–=– Voters Without Knowledge: The Modern State Of America –=–
Further scrutiny of the lack of knowledge of the citizens of the United States about their own government can be seen like clockwork every 4 years in yet more ceremony and ritual designed to fool the common people and divert their knowledge.
For in election time, the masses of people go through the useless motion of registering (obtaining legal residence in Washington D.C.) and standing in line to vote for a U.S. President that is, apparently unbeknownst to the vast majority of that population, actually indirectly elected by 538 congressional appointed electors every four years (not by the people). This seems to reveal that a great and purposeful culling of reason, logic, and especially knowledge has taken place within the population center of this nation of America – a people contractually enslaved by a corporation called United States, seemingly without their comprehension. It is this knowledge that must find its way into the hearts and minds of the indentured subjects of this corporate State, if for no other reason than to make them unfit to be slaves to a president they do not even elect. Only by exposing the true history of this central corporation we mistakenly call a country will the people ever be free to rid themselves of its tyranny.
For tyranny is freedom – the more laws to obey the more freedom to obey those laws we have. Freedom is a privilege granted by government, if you haven’t guessed, and is the exact opposite of being free…
–=–
“In reality, when the voters of North Carolina voted this past November, they were actually voting to pick this slate of electors
instead of voting directly for the president and the vice-president.”
–Elaine Marshall, Secretary of State of North Carolina, speaking at the 2012 Electoral College ceremony
–=–
It boggles the mind that anyone can really still believe that the appointment of the Commander In Chief of the United States military (U.S. President) would be left up to a “popular” vote of the common people! But apparently this illusion is a powerful one, as the millions upon millions of subjects are still voting in droves, urged on by the billions upon billions of dollars spent on maintaining the illusion with media enter-tain-ment; some standing in line for hours upon hours while suffering mental and physical abuses even as the actual election is held in college by congressional and political party appointed “electors”. So continues the illusion of choice by an indentured society that has no idea it is chained.
Article 2 of the constitution states:
Clause 1: Executive Power
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows…
Clause 2: Method of choosing electors
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
Clause 3: Electors
The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons… and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed… But in choosing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall choose from them by Ballot the Vice President.
Notice there is no mention of the “the people” in this election for president, because the people do not elect the president. The people only hold the legal status of mere voters, fooled into empowering the appointed Electors with their votes (granting consent to the Electoral College), literally giving away their rights and individual power as a powerless body politic (many men with only one voice = E-Pluribus Unum = “Out of Many, One.”). The people vote for representatives, never realizing that the representatives then indirectly appoint the electors that elect the president. Of course, the people also don’t comprehend that the President is their virtual king under military rule, as established by the War Powers Act and Emergency Declarations, as we will discuss herein.
The Electors are the true electors of the president, not the voters (the people), no different than any other corporation and its board of directors (legislature) – for customers of Walmart do not elect its board or its president any more than U.S. voters do. But the illusion is maintained every four years through media and print at the cost of many billions of dollars – all based on the ridiculous and heavily media-promoted fallacy that the people voteandelect the president.
And the people believe…
And the knowledge stays hidden behind the belief, pomp, and circumstance…
And the people are thus quite fit to be slaves.
As written above, the “Representation from each State has one Vote”, not the people. Furthermore, this election process does not even require all States to participate, stating that the election process is done with at least a “quorum”, with members of the Electoral College from only “two thirds of the States”.
So what is a quorum?
From Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856:
QUORUM. Used substantively, quorum signifies the number of persons belonging to a legislative assembly, a corporation, society, or other body, required to transact business…”
And from Black’s Law 4rth:
QUORUM.A majority of the entire body; e. g., a quorum of a state supreme court… Such a number of the members of a body as is competent to transact business in the absence of the other members. The idea of a quorum is that, when that required number of persons goes into a session as a body, such as directors of a corporation, the votes of a majority thereof are sufficient for binding action. When a committee, board of directors, meeting of shareholders, legislature or other body of persons cannot act unless a certain number at least of them are present, that number 1s called a “quorum.” Sweet. In the absence of any law or rule fixing the quorum, it consists of a majority of those entitled to act.
The establishment and perceived legitimacy of a de facto (illegitimate) quorum is of utmost importance in the most corrupt of legislative processes called “democracy”. If anything, this process of quorum majority rule should tell you that the United States is in no way a republic, for the representation of a minority of one or even 1/3 of the population is certainly not being heard in a quorum (more on this later). It means that as long as enough seats are filled with like-minded (or like-blooded) legislators, generally more than 50%, it is likely that this quorum of combined votes ensures the will of the group.
If two out of the three judges at a chili cook-off are blood-cousins of one of the cooks, it matters not what the 1/3 vote of the non-blood-cousin is. The quorum of 2/3 blood will decide what good chili is, even if its the worst chili in the world.
And if a State and its representatives decide that they don’t like the choices for president, the fact that it does not participate in the election still forces that State to have that president elected by the other representative Electors of other States. In essence, this of all things means that States absolutely do not have rights and are absolutely not sovereign. It also destroys the myth of the United States being a republic. Obviously, in order to elect or legislate by majority rule or by quorum, the United States government by default cannot be a republic and represent all people, all states, or all minorities, and the minority of one. There is no federal republic.
This process of democracy also gives the illusion that outsiders and non-bloodline and non-Freemason men and women – of any race and any creed or religion – can not only obtain legislative seats but actually have a voice for minorities or even the majority. Of course, the quorum will always win, and the Masonic bloodline is always the quorum.
This knowledge is needed, not just for the purposes of exposing the fraud and making good men unfit to be slaves, but also to show just how important the “Election” of this political position as head of the United States Incorporated and Commander In Chief of an entire military actually is. For the implementation of law requires one thing above all others – violent enforcement.
This knowledge is at the forefront of the understanding of law and the true force behind it. Each President of the United States acts outside of Congress with declared “Emergency Powers”, giving Him the authority of the representatives of the people (congress) to issue Executive Orders and Presidential Directives. The declaration of a “National Emergency”, be it for perceived war, terrorism, famine, drought, weather, pandemic, Swine Flu, international sanctions, or for countless other reasons, ensures the virtually unlimited “War Powers” of the President of the United States – powers of war in peacetime without the actual declaration of war. Of this fact and the actions taken by that Commander in Chief of the military, Congress is powerless by its own choice. Congress does not reveal this fact to the people who call Congress their “Representatives”, and yet it is fully aware of the disposition of this political office of President and the emergency powers it holds. And remember that Congress’s power to be powerless rests in the sacrament of “Deity“. This is why control of the Election process is vital as shown above, and why it is not left up to the popular vote of American slaves. The election must be by men and women of the same blood and of the Temple (the Electors).
Perhaps most important here is to state clearly that the United States Executive Branch of government is not bound by the constitution while under a declaration of emergency, for the president is specifically granted powers that trump that constitution. For instance, the “privilege” of Habeas Corpus is and has been suspended by the Executive indefinitely due to national emergency status. In the end, the illusion that this U.S. government is or ever was operating in any way “constitutional” must certainly die here, today, if the people of America are ever to be free.
Of course, I will prove this claim now…
–=– A National Emergency –=–
Before we further examine the past, let’s look at the present state of the constitution of the United States…
The constitution has one fatal and purposeful flaw – it is changeable. It can be amended. It can be suspended. And all of its previous amendments can and have been altered or repealed by later amendments or by legislation. This, in effect, means that the United States has no foundation in law, for the law is ever changing to suit the powers desired by the leaders of the nation. More important is the realization that the constitution was purposefully written to include these certain future changes, just as every Bill and Act of congress is also written first and amended so as to be unrecognizable later on. As with Acts of Congress, all they cared about is that the people accept it and then re-accept the constitution as it is amended years later.
Its second major flaw is that the constitution is interpretable.
For instance, would you say that the opinion (interpretation) of Supreme Court Justice, Editor of the American Law Review, professor at Harvard Law School, and bloodline cousin of all presidents including the president who appointed him, Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. was at all “constitutional”?
“…It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”
This was from the Buck vs. Bell, 1927, 8-1 decision upholding forced sterilization of women with bellow average intelligence in order to support a pure gene pool, for which the good of the state outweighed the rights and good of the individual.
So, in this one paragraph, it was declared constitutional to force surgical sterilization, force vaccination, force an I.Q. test, and to execute “degenerates” of lower than average intelligence.
In other words, the word “constitutional” is defined as whatever the court decides it is. The word is meaningless without honorable men making those decisions and giving meaning to the word. But the fact that this word “constitutional” is changeable and interpretable again shows that the foundation of law does not exist except as a changeable and lawless concept and tool of tyranny used to benefit the elite bloodline class.
Again we see with devious purpose that this document called the constitution was set up to be defeated. For each right it protects, it grants exceptions to that rule. And it allows government itself – the very entity that the constitution is designed to restrain – through the judicial branch of that government, to interpret the constitution as it sees fit. Thus, government legislates, polices, and prosecutes itself. In other words, if it chooses, the government is lawless – for the government is exempt from its own laws and constitution any time it chooses to be. This is the nature of a “sovereign” entity – for the sovereign lawmaker is always and by definition above its own law.
And this is exactly what government did… It rose above the constitution to grant itself literally unlimited power and authority, while still continuing the charade of the legislative and judicial process for the benefit of the knowledgeable, entertained, and governed people under it.
But the most important fact still remains generally unrealized by the people. And that is that the Executive Branch, as the enforcement arm of government,is the law. It controls the “Marshals of Law”. For Congress and the judicial have no power to back their laws or decisions if they have no military or police force under the Executive power to enforce them. Without military and police force, law is meaningless. And without honorable men in the military and police, whom themselves have knowledge, there can be no honor in law.
A declaration of national emergency by the Executive is very much the same as a declaration of War. It differs only in the fact that an actual war against another internationally recognized body politic (nation or country) does not exist. But this declaration is in effect a declaration of war against whatever is defined as the “emergency”. An emergency war against pandemic flu, for example, creates ample opportunity for tyranny and oppression, forced vaccination, quarantine and imprisonment, and even the killing of American Citizens as protection against the Emergency. These powers are not derived from the constitution, but from the extraordinary powers attained by that declaration outside of and above the constitution and congress and through the sacred oath as the rites of the City.
All you need to know is that the President is now and has for over 80 years been acting without constitutional limitations – despite what scripted and televised screenplays are shown to you on television and the news.
Perhaps the worst of these is the Declaration of Emergency against “Terrorism”. This esoteric and undefined “enemy” of the United States gives the President of the United States free reign to send His Executive military via Executive Privilege to any nation He chooses, including within the borders of His United States. It is a literal declaration of war on the emergency, which in this case is whatever the President or Congress defines as a “terrorist”, either foreign or domestic.
Note here that the word domestic means any and all Americans (citizens) can be designated as “terrorists” or “enemy of the State” at the president’s whim, and at varying levels of implementation and profiling. Surveillance, data collection, no-fly lists, terrorist watch lists, revocation of passport or other legal status, incarceration, rendition, and assassination are all tools declared legal and necessary under the Executive’s emergency powers. The constitution or other protections of law do not apply under the rules of war, because there is no declared lawful war. This makes the new Utah NSA data center, for example, a legal business enterprise because it is being utilized to fight the declared “national emergency” of terrorism. To argue its invalidity under the constitution is pointless, because the Executive Branch and its Cabinets and Departments (including the NSA) are not operating under the bounds of the constitution – the NSA is operating under emergency powers, because the NSA is an Executive Branch agency. There is only one Executive Officer (Corporation Sole) who is elected by the Electors. All others are appointed (hired) as employees of that elected president. Thus, they all act under his authority, and his authority is not of the people but of the Congressional approved declared emergency. You must know that all of these extraordinary war and emergency powers only exist in times of declared emergency, and so this should be the center stage topic of your next president in any debate – demanding an end to all emergency powers and declarations. Congress will never do it for you, for they benefit greatly from this state of emergency and many if not most are blood cousins of all successive (and the current) president – the Roman line of rulers and councilmen within the Holy Rite to rule.
Importantly, without this emergency status in government, legislation like the Patriot Act would be otherwise unlawful or against the constitution. But emergency status creates legal (BAR) justification for those Acts, according to government. In this way the complacency and cooperation of congress can be understood, for congress creates the Executive Offices that the President utilizes in these emergencies.
–=–
In 1973, the Senate was charged with compiling a report of which it was to decide upon the efficacy and necessity of the continuance of these Emergency War Powers of the Executive Branch. This report was named Senate Report 93-549, and was commissioned by the “Special Committee on the Termination of the National Emergency”.
The report’s introduction opens as such:
“Since March the 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency… A majority of the people of the United States have lived all their lives under emergency rule… For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency… And, in the United States, actions taken by the government in times of great crisis have from, at least, the Civil War in important ways shaped the present phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency.”
–=–
40 years before 1973…?
That’s right! For this abomination of legal tyranny was created when then President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, along with a zealous Congress, created the legal threshold that allowed for the Office of the President of the Untied States to usurp supreme power over His subjects (14th amendment Citizens) outside of and without Congressional approval. Once declared by congress, the constitution and congress were left virtually powerless against the actions of the president.
And none dare call it treason…
This first national emergency, declared in 1933, was presented to overcome the economic throws of the Great Depression and to instill a central banking structure to replace lawful money with legal tender (fiat). But in reality, it represented the indefinite suspension of the constitution of the United States in the scope of powers granted to the Executive Branch of government. In short, this temporary emergency power granted by Congress became a permanent fixture in the United States, and in 2013 this country is still suffering its creation.
Then newly elected president Franklin D. Roosevelt in his inaugural address on March 4rth, 1933 stated :
“I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require. These measures, or such other measures as the Congress may build out of its experience and wisdom, I shall seek, within my constitutional authority, to bring to speedy adoption. But in the event that the Congress shall fail to take one of these two courses, and in the event that the national emergency is still critical, I shall not evade the clear course of duty that will then confront me. I shall ask the Congress for the one remaining instrument to meat the crisis broad Executive power to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe.”
Notice that the president asked congress for this extraordinary power, he did not demand it. Also note that congress gave the Executive Branch this power by choice, and more importantly within its constitutional authority to do so!
It was the next day, March 5th of 1933, that President Roosevelt requested a special and extraordinary session of Congress (Proclamation 2038), which stated:
–=–
Proclamation 2038 – Calling Congress into Extraordinary Session, March 5, 1933
By the President of the United States of America
A Proclamation
Whereas public interests require that the Congress of the United States should be convened in extra session at twelve o’clock, noon, on the Ninth day of March, 1933, to receive such communication as may be made by the Executive;
Now, Therefore, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim and declare that an extraordinary occasion requires the Congress of the United States to convene in extra session at the Capitol in the City of Washington on the Ninth day of March, 1933, at twelve o’clock, noon, of which all persons who shall at that time be entitled to act as members thereof are hereby required to take notice.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the great seal of the United States.
Indeed, Congress was so assembled on March 9th, 1933, and the spawn of that assemblage gave to the office of president powers not only outside of and above the Constitution of the United States, but the Executive power to ignore congress and its processes altogether. There, president Roosevelt presented an Act enabling a declared national emergency in banking and for other purposes, stating:
“Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that the Congress hereby declares that a serious emergency exists and that it is imperatively necessary speedily to put into effect remedies of uniform national application.”
This became the “Act of March 9, 1933”, as written into Congressional law.
And this uniform national emergency power has been with us and over us ever since, as we will see… The only difference is that congress now allows the president to declare His own emergencies with no oversight or vote from congress as to its legitimacy or lawfulness. The congress acts as a “rubber stamp” for the presidential declaration of emergency without deliberation.
This “uniform” national application mentioned here made way for the private enactment of what are called the “Uniform Acts”, including Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which was first published in 1952.
Of the many states, one government…
In the United States, uniform laws are created through what are called “Uniform Acts“, which are bills proposed as state law by a private association. These Acts are drafted of course by the BAR association (part of the Executive Branch), mostly through their United States Uniform Law Commission (ULC), which is then approved by another private association: The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL). The NCCUSL is a body of BAR Association lawyers, private and government attorneys, state and federal judges (attorneys in black robes), and university law professors (attorneys perverting young minds), typically appointed by the governor of each state. They draft laws with the goal of uniform enactment by each state, the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico. But the NCCUSL does not have any direct legislative power in and of itself as an appointed private association. Its drafted uniform acts become law only to the extent that they are enacted into law by state legislators (those Masonic blood-right representatives of the people) – not the actual vote of the masses of people of each state.
This is the horror of “representative democracy” – the mob rule of millions controlled (governed) by a few bloodline men.
And here we see again the importance of taking the power away from the masses of people (E-Pluribus Unum) and handing it over to these “representatives”. For the people would never vote to enact such uniform laws of debt and enslavement upon themselves to take away state’s rights. The people must be made impotent by the legal system and its quorum. Our 100’s of millions of voices must be squelched by “representative democracy”. Their BAR lawmakers must be appointed so that their congressmen can thus approve those laws as supposed representatives of the people. In the end, the people do not make law; the BAR and private corporations draft law and the Congress approves it!
Over 100 uniform laws and acts have been created by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL), which have since been approved and adopted for the people (not by the people) under this Executive national emergency status. Chances are at least one of these effects your life in “interstate commerce”, including the Child Protection Services (CPS) agency that has kidnapped, harmed, and murdered so many of our children as “property” of government. They include:
Imagine… all of these “Acts” are unlawful, de facto, prima facie, absolutely demolish any form of State’s sovereignty, and are created under military occupation and rule by a corrupted law society. They are then forced upon we, the contracted people/commodities of that corporate occupation. And none of them were written by the people or by the representatives of the people, but by the very BAR attorneys who administrate their own uniform codes for profit on an international scale and in their own court system.
For those of you who still believe in the mythological “States Rights” we so often hear about but never actually see, this uniformity of law – especially the UCC and Acts like #100 from the above list (Uniform State Administrative Procedure Act) – destroys any such notion. Like the people, States rights have been usurped by uniform codes that turn all 50 States into one powerless voice as represented. Of course under the rules of war, States only really exist at the discretion of the Executive Commander in Chief and those who control Him under military rule, as we will see. Of course, this does something much worse than eliminate states rights, for it implements international laws between nations, including the United States.
In the United Nations, the United States is not referred to as a “nation”, but is instead referred to as a “State” of the United Nations, just as California and New York are referred to as “States” of the United States. The word “of” means belonging to under law. And each nation as a member of the United Nations is now operating under these same or similar internationally scaled uniform codes. Thus the illusion and conceptual romanticism of the word sovereignty must also be stated here as a patriotic fallacy promoted by this militarily ruling United States corporation and bloodline through its media monopolies and its similar monopoly on the university and public school system’s curriculum.
Bouvier’s 1856 explains some important aspects of just what sovereignty is, and we must always remember that sovereignty does not exist if challenged and defeated or taken via treaty by a military force greater than the sovereign’s… as is the case with the former militias of each state of America and each individual that is allowed to believe he or she is a sovereign on the land. Only a nation or kingdom with a military force can truly be sovereign…
SOVEREIGN.A chief ruler with supreme power; one possessing sovereignty. It is also applied to a king or other magistrate with limited powers. 2. In the United States the sovereignty resides in the body of the people.
For those “man on the land” free men out there who also claim that each man is a sovereign or king of himself or that the constitution states as much, you couldn’t be more erroneous in your summation of what this word sovereign means. For a man cannot be a sovereign unless he unlawfully or lawfully rules other men, which always means the use of force of law. Thus, no honorable man can justify this position of sovereign ruler of men. Note here also the fallacy that claims sovereignty has residence in the “body” of people. But this would mean that all people rule over all other people simultaneously (i.e. self-government), and this just isn’t the case. The “body politic” is ruled by government (mind control) and its congress, not by the common people. No matter how you define this word, there can be no honor in being a sovereign, for it requires the forceful subjection to your will by other men. In other words, a man with no subjects is not qualified to claim sovereignty because there is no body to rule over. And this again shows that force is absolutely necessary in any form of law, be it defense or offense. A republic is the law of one man over himself in agreement with other like-minded individuals. The problem is that honor is not a requirement in law as force is. And the people delegate their individual power over to the government.
Your pet is about the closest thing you might be considered a sovereign of, and yet government requires vaccines, tags, licenses, papers, and other permissions letting you know you are not a sovereign. Same goes with your children.
Keep in mind that if law is considered to be the sovereign law of the land, then the supreme chief ruler is the law, and the creators via the enforcers of that law are thus the true sovereign ruler with supreme violent power. A sovereign is a dictator, no matter how moral or full of ethics and niceties you set that dictatorship up to be. For the sovereign dictates the law, be it one man or many men on a council. So here we can see again that the patriotic and romantic idea and belief in and of sovereignty is more dangerous than the standing army behind the real sovereign. No natural man should claim legal status under any sovereign authority, for a sovereign must by necessity act as if it were above God’s law (natural law).
The reality is that if you have a legal status as “equal” people and citizens then you are also subject to all other rights and devices of that sovereign, including pain, punishment, taxes, and extortion (exaction). There is nothing in between. If you are equal under the law, then you are in a state of servitude to a sovereign. Only an outlaw (a lone ranger) can be a free man, and then only while he can defend his or here realm (land, home, possessions, and life) against other sovereign powers who seek his or her subjection to that sovereign authority. To do this, that man must be sovereign over other men for purposes of defense, which makes being a sovereign always either a position of no honor as forceful ruler or a pointless endeavor due to lack of military force that will protect that status.
The Masonic trick, of course, is to convince all or most of the individual people to all give up their individual natural rights, which otherwise gives them a naturally free disposition as “outlaws”, to become a member of the body politic via accepting membership (citizenship) and contractually assigning their sovereignty over to a “representative”. In the U.S. Code, a representative Congressman or Senator is defined as an “employee of the United States” government. Of course, only corporations can have employees. As per the above definition and all that has been disclosed thus far, it should be obvious that the OFFICE of the president of the United States is now the CHIEF RULER WITH SUPREME POWER!
SOVEREIGN STATE. One which governs itself independently of any foreign power.
Here again, it should be obvious that no State within the union of the United States governs (controls) itself independently from any foreign power. The foreign power is the United States central government (Washington D.C.) – the sacred theocracy!!!
SOVEREIGNTY. The union and exercise of all human power possessed in a state; it is a combination of all power; it is the power to do everything in a state without accountability; to make laws, to execute and to apply them: to impose and collect taxes, and, levy, contributions; to make war or peace; to form treaties of alliance or of commerce with foreign nations, and the like. 2. Abstractedly, sovereignty resides in the body of the nation and belongs to the people. But these powers are generally exercised by delegation(i.e. power of attorney). 3. When analyzed, sovereignty is naturally divided into three great powers; namely, the legislative, the executive, and the judiciary; the first isthe power to make new laws, and to correct and repeal the old; the second is the power to (violently)execute the laws both at home and abroad; and the last is the power to apply the laws to particular facts; to judge the disputes which arise among the citizens, and to punish crimes. 4. Strictly speaking, in our republican forms of government, the absolute sovereignty of the nation is in the people of the nation; (q. v.) and the residuary sovereignty of each state, not granted to any of its public functionaries, is in the people of the state.
So a sovereign is not under or subject to even its own law! Welcome to the United States…
It acts “without accountability” according to its own created sovereign law. So why would any man wish to be a citizen under a sovereign, be it another man or government? In truth, this question only becomes apparent to ask when one finally realizes he is enslaved by his sovereign – his Ruler and Chief military officer behind the force of law – and that he in no way lives in a “free country”.
Far from it…
Remember, Bouvier’s Law Dictionary was commissioned and compiled well before Roosevelt’s first national emergency was declared, and is the most representative and honest legal view of the time per the creation of the constitution and its legal language, commissioned by and entered officially into the constitution, congress, the Supreme Court, etc. And also remember that in 1933, congress as the representatives of the people of all states, voted to (temporarily) suspend the constitution and grant the “power of the people” and of the “states” to the newly granted extraordinary powers of the Executive Office to act as temporary sovereign through emergency declaration; an act that has never been repealed. And this action is perfectly constitutional!!!
It is also extremely important to comprehend that just like the kings and queens of England who gained their authority from the office granted to them via the crown temple (Masonic church), the president is only the current person (lesser monarch) occupying the Office, which is the corporate entity that holds the authority (permission) granted by the people (via Congress). It is the United States corporation that holds this tyrannical power, not the president as a man. For the man is appointed by the government (church). So blaming the man is a worthless endeavor, especially when the man is just the latest in a series of blood-cousins of the Monarchs of England who’s Corporation Sole will simply be passed on to his cousin. More importantly, it is the people’s belief in that power and authority (the people’s permission) that gives legitimacy to that power of the United States and its current president as their “Chief Ruler”.
As with any cult, belief by its members is the key to a cult’s authority – the permission of the people to rule over them.
–=– Monarchy: The Ritual Mocking Of God –=–
Before we continue with this national emergency status as it applies today, it is interesting to note that the Divine Right Monarchs are granted their powers only when sanctioned by the process of religious Coronation (custom), which literally means that they are anointed with oil in the Church. This custom extends to both Judaism and Masonry, as well as many forms of Christianity.
The Hebrew word for Christ or “Christos” translates to mean “anointed”, or “the anointed”.
Thus when we say Jesus the Christ, we are really saying Jesus the Anointed.
The difference between the Biblical Christ and the Monarch men and women who claim the Christ-like power of God on Earth is that in the story of the Bible, the living Christ did not need the temporal Churches’ approval to be the chosen (anointed) by and as the Son of God, while inversely these bloodline cousins who psychotically claim to be and rule through “God” by their Crown and Coronation rituals must be appointed and physicallyanointed by the church in a ceremonial custom. While Christ was spiritually anointed without ritual or ceremony, Monarchs and president/prophets of incorporated churches must be temporally anointed in ritual fashion.
Considering the fact that King James and other Royal Monarchs commissioned their own versions of the Holy Bible (certainly a fact that bears at the minimum several conflicts of interest about the true history of the Lord of Lords and King of Kings), don’t you ever wonder why the Church of England and its anointed Christian (God/Christ-like) kings and queens should seemingly be so afraid of and demonize the Biblical “Anti-Christ” in their own re-translated Bibles? Just why would these sovereign rulers claiming to rule by God’s power wish to make the people who are subject to the will of the church and of that king or queen so very afraid of the “anti-Christ”?
Anti-Christ = Anti-Anointed = Anti-Monarchs.
The allegory of the Anti-Christ… A scary story told to ensure the strangle-hold of the appointed/anointed Monarchs who claim God’s kingdom for themselves over the people. Beware the anti-Christ!!!
Are not the Coronation (anointed) Monarchs and Ecclesiastical churches and the Pope claiming to be God; claiming to rule by God’s word and authority (permission)? Does this not make them as an artificial Christ/God on Earth – the great pretenders acting in Christ’s place? And if indeed their power is blasphemously derived from the personification of the Christos as God, church, and government, would these artificial Christ-men and women not certainly wish for their subjects to fear the thought of an anti-Christ that would strip them of that Divine Right to Rule God’s earthly kingdom?
After all, according to their sacred articles and doctrines, they rule in God’s absence not in His presence.
And this begs an examination of the Christ story itself, especially when considering that Freemasonry refers to it as an allegory of the Sun (god), and that the Crown Queen of England is a most high Masonic seat…
And so I have my own thoughts on the subject, which I include here only as food for thought:
Death is anti-Life. For life is truly the opposite of death, and life on Earth is certainly the opposite of any possible “after-life”. The concept of reincarnation is not after-life, for it is the karma of the next life, and therefore not necessarily opposed to nature on Earth. Living in this life on Earth is natural, while living in or after death is wholly unnatural (not of nature/Earth). Very importantly and as we have discussed, these words natural and unnatural very much relate to law as well. Natural law is also called “God’s Law”. This natural law is what the Biblical Jesus the “Christos” reportedly taught to his disciples when he was in the form of a natural man and only when He was alive on Earth – as written in the story of the Bible. But in the legal realm of artificial things and citizens (artificial persons), man’s (man-made/artificial) political contract law is actually very much against or anti-natural law (anti-God’s Law). Governments and churches certainly could be said to be against or “anti-Christ’s” terrestrial teachings of nature to do no harm to others or their property, for government and ecclesiastical law is a violation of natural law in that a political right is designed to take away a natural right (to enslave). And so it is my opinion and thesis here that a great and deceitful trick has been played upon the people of Earth, using the rituals and ceremonies of religions to cover up the true Christian teachings of the translated Bible in order to use “Christianity” and other forms of corporate religion to justify the bloodline rule of the common people – for men to rule as if they were gods. The same could be said about the Declaration of Independence and its use in justifying the constitution, despite the fact that the constitution is in direct violation of that Declaration. The Monarchy and Corporate religions are in direct violation of Christ. These churches could, in this light, be referred to as anti-Christ.
–=–
“Pharaoh… Let my people go, that they may serve me.”
The supreme ruler of ancient Egypt; a formal address for the sovereign seat of power as personified by the ‘king’ in an institutional role of Horus son of Osiris; often used by metonymy for Ancient Egyptian sovereignty.
–=–
Could not the same be said of and to reigning sovereigns of government today? For “Pharaoh was an office, not a man. It was the “House” that claimed superiority and “sovereignty” over the people via the Pagan gods.
And so the holy book of today might be written:
Obama… let my people go!
Queen Elizabeth II… let my people go!
Pope… let my people go!
Mormon Prophet… let my people go!
Israel… let my people go!
…So that we may all serve God and His nature instead of worshiping and tithing in your artificial ritualistic anti-God corporations.
–=–
The bloodline:
Obama is the 22nd Great-Grandson of William the Conqueror
–=–
Considering that law and governments have always been Ecclesiastical in nature – from the Roman civilization to the Vatican to the Kingdom of England and its Divine Church to America itself – this literally makes the church and its government anti-God, for to be against the laws of nature (the natural rights of men) is to be against the laws of God. For God accordingly would be the One who created and is all of nature. And when we consider that every corporate Christian church teaches men to obey the laws of the land, and that the definition for “laws of the land” are in fact of the artificial man-made Masonic governments, its man-made Masonic constitution, and its man-made legal codes that usurp and destroy everything in nature including rights, we can see that the government corporations known as churches and religions are really teaching the opposite of the Biblical story of the living Christ, who taught natural law. The law of the land is not natural law. It is not God’s law. And the law of the land (man’s law) in government is quite often opposite to or anti-Christ’s teachings, certainly quite often anti-life, and definitely anti-nature. For government and religion is of men, not of God.
But when we consider the fact that the corporate “Church” has always been the source of man’s law, a whole new element and historical view of the role of the Church in government and as government rears its ugly head. For the church if anything is against the living Christ in favor of the dead one; ruling in God’s name on Earth while going against the teachings of the Christos as a government supposedly ordained by Go, and even as it promotes the empty promise and anticipation of His return. In the Biblical story of His life, Christ taught God’s natural law. In death, God’s law of nature has been negated by the church/government by the falsely anointed kings, which claim to act through God upon the sacred rite of Christos (Coronation). So how can the church not be called anti-Christ when it claims man’s authority over nature (over God)? For God’s kingdom, if nothing else, is nature itself.
Was Jesus a member of a corporate church or government, or did He deny such temporal and ritualistic things.
Aren’t we to do what Jesus did?
If Jesus were made a citizen of the United States before He could walk, speak, or rationally consent to such a contractual relationship as a constitutor to the United States, what would Jesus do to end that literal bondage? Would he tell his people to obey the law of the land, government, and church?
Would he not instead demand that the modern-day Pharaoh’s of all the nations let his people go in God’s name?
Isn’t being a Christian tantamount to acting in Jesus’ name and teachings?
Isn’t it time to start acting like the Christian you claim to be?
If we really think about it, the dogma within the upper echelon (not the common people) of corporate religion based around their falsely projected Christianity is actually a death cult – worshiping the unnatural state of a man living in death (spirit). Just as they claim to be Jews but are not, they claim to be Christians but are not. All they really are is a spiritual assembly of government (mind control) – the gatekeepers to true spirituality through their rewritten Bibles teachings and ritual.
Whether or not this is a good or bad thing is quite irrelevant, and offense is certainly not the intention here. Again we must remember that the common people of the church who worship individually – as well as the common people of the nation – are not the subject of this writing. For it is the Holy incorporation of the church and its religious doctrine and claimed authorities that is being used by that corporation to claim the power of God on Earth not by the common people, but by these chosen anointed few over the common people and Earth (nature).
We of course see the word spirit in legal definitions, for again we must acknowledge that all law is derived from ecclesiastical sacra-ment and implemented via bloody force (as documented clearly in the Bible and in history).
SPIRITUAL. Relating to religious or ecclesiastical persons or affairs, as distinguished from “secular” or lay, worldly, or business matters. As to spiritual “Corporation”, “Courts”, and “Lords”, see those titles.
SPIRITUALITIES OF A BISHOP. Those profits which a bishop receives in his ecclesiastical character, as the dues arising from his ordaining and instituting priests, and such like, in contradistinction to those profits which he acquires in his temporal capacity as a baron and lord of parliament, and which are termed his “temporalities,” consisting of certain lands, revenues, and lay fees, etc.
SPIRITUALITY OF BENEFICES. In ecclesiastical law. The tithes of land, etc.
BENEFICE. In ecclesiastical law. In its technical sense, this term includes ecclesiastical preferments to which rank or public office is attached, otherwise described as ecclesiastical dignities or offices, such as bishoprics, deaneries, and the like; but in popular acceptation, it is almost invariably appropriated to rectories, vicarages, perpetual curacies, district churches, and endowed chapelries. “Benefice” is a term derived from the feudal law, in which it signified a permanent stipendiary estate, or an estate held by feudal tenure.
BENEFICE. In French law. A benefit or advantage, and particularly a privilege given by the law rather than by the agreement of the parties.
I must declare here that only the demented mind of an attorney or psychopath could create the definition of spiritualityas a tithe or profit (money).
The benefits of our United States “politicians” are certainly not based upon an agreement of the people, and are certainly a privilege given to themselves by their own laws for which they themselves create from within their spiritual corporation of public office!!!
And I must say that If God ever does touch down on earth again to reappear in the natural realm as God on Earth and Lord King, He certainly would not need the approval (physical act of anointment) of even the most Saintly of priest, king, queen, government, or parliament. For priests and kings supposedly attain their power from God, not the other way around. God would not need man’s approval or ceremony for anything that He chose to do, if I’m not mistaken. Yet apparently those Popes, priests, kings, queens, and presidents believe that they are all God’s chosen ones to command on behalf of God on Earth from somewhere in the anti-earth (after-life).
–=– Long Live the Queen, Long Live King Solomon! –=–
In the following video of the coronation of the queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and all of that crown temple’s political land mass possessions, we can clearly see that this is a religious ceremony as opposed to a solely governmental one. This is obvious and is a well known fact, considering the queen or king is also being given the sacramentum (the sacred oath) and becoming the anointed bloodline Masonic head of the Church of England.
The king or queen according to the medieval view was mixta persona (i.e., both layman and ecclesiastic) and therefore obtained spiritualis jurisdictionis capax (a fit subject for spiritual jurisdiction).
That’s right… spiritual jurisdiction; as in the jurisdiction of some other-worldly god.
The Catholic Church explains:
(You may click on the red/blue links for more detail)
“By ministerial authority, which is conferred by an act of consecration, is meant the inward, and, because of its indelible character, permanent capacity to perform acts by which Divine grace is transmitted. By ruling authority, which is conferred by the Church (missio canonica, canonical mission), is understood the authority to guide and rule the Church of God. Jurisdiction, in so far as it covers the relations of man to God, is called jurisdiction of the internal forum or jurisdiction of the forum of Heaven (jurisdictio poli)… Jurisdiction, in so far as it regulates external ecclesiastical relations, is called jurisdiction of the external forum, or briefly jurisdictio fori. This jurisdiction, the actual power of ruling is legislative, judicial, or coactive… Ordinary jurisdiction is that which is permanently bound, by Divine or human law, with a permanent ecclesiastical office. Its possessor is called an ordinary judge. By Divine law the pope has such ordinary jurisdiction for the entire Church and a bishop for his diocese. By human law this jurisdiction is possessed by thecardinals, officials of the Curia and the congregations of cardinals, the patriarchs, primates, metropolitans, archbishops, the praelati nullius, and prelates with quasi-epsicopal jurisdiction, the chapters of orders, or, respectively, the heads of orders, cathedral chapters in reference to their own affairs, the archdiaconate in the Middle Ages, and parishpriests in the internal forum… Temporary exercise of ordinary and quasi-ordinary jurisdiction can be granted, in varying degrees, to another as representative, without conferring on him an office properly so called. In this transient form jurisdiction is called delegated or extraordinary, and concerning it canon law, following theRoman law, has developed exhaustive provisions. This development began when the popes, especially since Alexander III (1159-81), found themselves obliged, by the enormous mass of legal business which came to them from all sides as the “judices ordinarii omnium” to hand over, with proper instruction, a large number of cases to third parties for decision, especially in matters of contentious jurisdiction. Delegated jurisdiction rests either on a special authorization of the holders of ordinary jurisdiction (delegatio ab homine), or on a general law (delegatio a lege, a jure, a canone)…
The Church has the right, as a perfect and independentsociety provided with all the means for attaining its end, to decide according to itslaws disputes arising concerning its internal affairs, especially as to the ecclesiasticalrights of its members, also to carry out its decision, if necessary, by suitable means of compulsion, contentious or civil jurisdiction. It has, therefore, the right to admonish or warn its members, ecclesiasticalor lay, who have not conformed to its laws and also, if needful to punish them by physical means, that is, coercive jurisdiction. The church has, first, the power to judgesin. This it does in the internal forum. But asin can be at the same time externally a misdemeanour or a crime (delictum, crimen), when threatened with external ecclesiastical or civil punishment. The Church also judges ecclesiastical crimes in the external forum by infliction of penalties, except when the wrong doing has remained secret(Clint says: think secret child ritual sexual abuse). In this case it contents itself, as a rule, with penancevoluntarily assumed. Finally, another distinction is to be drawn between necessary jurisdiction and voluntary jurisdiction; the latter contemplates voluntary subjection on the part of those who seek in legal matters the co-operation of ecclesiastical agencies, e.g. notarially executed instruments, testaments, etc. The judicial power described above, jurisdiction strictly so called, was given byChristto HisChurch, was exercised by the Apostles, and transmitted to their successors (Matthew 18:15 sqq.; 1 Corinthians 4:21; 5:1 sqq.; 2 Corinthians 13:10; 1 Timothy 1:20; 5:19 sq.).
From the beginning of the Christian religion the ecclesiastical judge, i.e. the bishop, decided matters of dispute that were purely religious in character (causae mere ecclesiasticae). This jurisdiction of theChurch was recognized by the civil (imperial) power when it becameChristian. But long before this the early Christians, following the exhortation of Saint Paul (1 Corinthians 6:14), were wont to submit to ecclesiastical jurisdiction matters which by their nature belonged to the civil courts. As long asChristianity was not recognized by the State it was left to theconscience of the individual whether he would conform to the decision of thebishop or not. When, however,Christianity had received civil recognition,Constantine the Great raised the former private usage to a public law. According to an imperial constitution of the year 321 the parties in dispute could, by mutual agreement, bring the matter before the bishopeven when it was already pending before a civil judge, and the latter (judge) wasobliged to put into effect the decision of thebishop. A further constitution of 331 provided that in any stage of the suit any one of the parties could appeal to the bishopeven against the will of the others (Hanel, “De constitutionibus, quas F. Sirmondus, Paris, an. 1631 edidit,” 1840). But Arcadius, in 398, and Honorius, in 408, limited the judicial competence of the bishop to those cases in which both parties applied to him (lex VII, Cod. Just., De audientia episc., I, iv). This arbitral jurisdiction of the bishop was not recognized in the new Teutonic kingdoms. In the Frankish kingdoms purely ecclesiastical matters of dispute belonged to the jurisdiction of the bishop, but mixed cases, in which civil interests appeared, e.g. marriage questions, law suits concerning Church property, etc., belonged to the civil courts.
In the course of the Middle Ages the Churchsucceeded in extending its jurisdiction over all matters that offered an ecclesiastical interest (causae spiritualibus annexae), all litigation concerning marriages (c. vii, X, Qui filii sint legit., IV, xvii; c. vii, X, De donat., IV, xx); matters concerning burial (X, De sepult., III, xxviii); testaments (X, De testam., III, xxvi); compacts ratified with anoath (c. iii, in VI°, De foro compet., II, ii); matters pertaining tobenefices (c. ii, X, De suppl. neglig. praelat., I, x); questions of patronage (X, De jur. patron., III, xxxviii); litigation concerning church property and tithes (X, De decim., III, xxx). In addition all civil litigation in which the element ofsin was in question (ratio peccati) could be summonded before an ecclesiastical court (c. xiii, X, De judic., II, i).
Ecclesiastical Person
In its etymological sense this expression signifies everyperson who forms a part of the external and visible society which constitutes theChurch, and who has not been canonically expelled therefrom. But the expression is rarely used in this sense; customarily it indicates persons whom a special tie connects with theChurch, either because they have received ecclesiastical tonsure, minor, or higher orders, and are a fortiori invested with a power of jurisdiction; or because they have taken vows in a religious order or congregation approved by theChurch. This more intimate union with the Church involves particular duties which are not incumbent on the general faithful (see CLERIC).
–=–
“Her Majesty being now Anointed; wearing the Colobium Sindonis
and the Supertunica or Close Pall of cloth of gold, together with a girdle of the same, is seated once more in King Edward’s Chair.”
The Queen, as soon as she enters at the west door of the Church, is to be received with this Anthem:
Psalm 122, 1–3, 6, 7.
I was glad when they said unto me:
We will go into the house of the Lord.
Our feet shall stand in thy gates: O Jerusalem. Jerusalem is built as a city: that is at unity in itself. O pray for the peace of Jerusalem:
they shall prosper that love thee.
Peace be within thy walls:
and plenteousness within thy palaces.
later, other Psalms are read:
Psalm 84, 9, 10.
Behold, O God our defender: and look upon the face of thine Anointed.
For one day in thy courts:
is better than a thousand.
I Kings 1, 39, 40.
Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet anointed Solomon king;
and all the people rejoiced and said
God save the king,
Long live the king,
May the king live for ever. Amen. Hallelujah.
(**Note: Elizabeth is the blood apparent line of King Solomon, as we can see here by the “God save; Long live” ceremony that was said for Solomon long ago. This explains the end goal of all these societies to rebuild the Third Temple
After reestablishing their Kingdom of Jerusalem [Israel].)
And the Archbishop shall…
On the palms of both the hands, saying, Be thy Hands anointed with holy Oil.
On the breast, saying, Be thy Breast anointed with holy Oil.
On the crown of the head, saying, Be thy Head anointed with holy Oil: as kings, priests, and prophets were anointed:
And as Solomon was anointed king
by Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet, so be thou anointed, blessed, and consecrated Queen
over the Peoples, whom the Lord thy God hath given thee to rule and govern, In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.
Then shall the Dean of Westminster lay the Ampulla and Spoon upon the Altar;
and the Queen kneeling down at the faldstool, the Archbishop shall say this Blessing over her:
Our Lord Jesus Christ,
the Son of God, who by his Father was anointed with the Oil of gladness above his fellows, by his holy Anointing pour down upon your Head and Heart the blessing of the Holy Ghost,
and prosper the works of your Hands:
that by the assistance of his heavenly grace you may govern and preserve the Peoples committed to your charge in wealth, peace, and godliness;
and after a long and glorious course
of ruling a temporal kingdom
wisely, justly, and religiously,
you may at last be made partaker of an eternal kingdom,
through the same Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
“The word ‘amen’ is from Ammon, the father god of Egypt,
and was an ancient Egyptian salutation to the supreme power of the universe”
–Manly P Hall, ‘How To Understand Your Bible’
–=–
“For all the promises of God in Him are yea, and in Him Amen, unto the glory of God by us.”
–Corinthians 1:20, KJB
–=–
“To the angel of the Church in Laodicea write:
These are the words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the ruler of God’s creation.”
–Revelation 3:14, KJB
–=–
“For I know that… a Hereditary Monarchy… only exists with the support and consent of the people”
–Queen Elizabeth II, Nov. 20, 1997
–=–
Here, the queen is not simply stating the legal term implying that consent is required of the people for her Sovereignty. She is literally stating that only because the defeated and uneducated people allow this charade of unholy and unnatural government to continue, she and her blood and ilk will continue to rule the people solely because of their lack of resistance and lack of desire to live under God’s natural law. For she knows that control of true Christians under the false ritualized Christian Church and State is imperative to her family rule over all people. The Christian soldiers have lost their way…
–=– And Now… The Hereditary Sovereign U.S. Presidency A Rite Consented To By The American People –=–
In 1933, at the inception, deliberation, and creation of this official usurpation of the powers and authority of Congress over its Executive (Corporation Sole Roosevelt), Congressman James M. Beck spoke officially, stating (from the Congressional Record):
“I think of all the damnable heresies that have ever been suggested in connection with the Constitution, the doctrine of emergency is the worst. It means that when Congress declares an emergency, there is no Constitution. This means its death. It is the very doctrine that the German chancellor is invoking today in the dying hours of the parliamentary body of the German republic, namely, that because of an emergency, it should grant to the German chancellor absolute power to pass any law, even though the law contradicts the Constitution of the German republic. Chancellor Hitler is at least frank about it. We pay the Constitution lip-service, but the result is the same… the Constitution of the United States, as a restraining influence in keeping the federal government within the carefully prescribed channels of power, is moribund, if not dead. We are witnessing its death-agonies, for when this bill becomes a law, if unhappily it becomes a law, there is no longer any workable Constitution to keep the Congress within the limits of its Constitutional powers… This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities, assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.“
It is important to note that Congressman Beck resigned his seat from the Legislature one year later, in September of 1934, and was quoted as giving the reason for his resignation. He stated that Congress had become “merely a rubber stamp for the Executive.”
No truer words could have been said, in the past or in the present, and the cooperative efforts of Congress and the Executive have led America into the military rule (martial law of the Sovereign) we have today. For we are under several declared states of emergency as I write, whether re-declared or newly created by each new president.
If only the people of America would realize that they must resign their citizenship (membership) to the United States (corporation) if ever they wish to be free in America and in the world (nature) again…
Perhaps more to the point, the people of America would have to stop joining the United States military and recreate the lawful militia of each State in order to fight this invading U.S. army, or fight it themselves. The people of each state would need to forcibly drive out the United States military bases in each of their States to break that chain of control, which collectively represent the military occupation of each State according to the Lieber Code (see below) by this foreign United States corporation.
Ironically, this would require the teaching of this knowledge to the men and women who are employed as soldiers in that U.S. military, who have no idea that they are part of an invading military force in America and in their own hometowns… and have no idea that they are occupying the land of their parents and children. For the most important aspect of the power and authority of a military occupation is the manpower and manipulation of its military men, who learned patriotism and allegiance to the flag over the people in the very government schools they grew up in and from the movies and television their parents allowed them to watch. Without that violent military force, these lawmakers would have no power to enforce their sacred articles and uniform international codes, and those civil judges would have no force behind their overarching decisions.
This education of the military by the people and States they ignorantly occupy, in retrospect, should be at the forefront of our efforts to be a free people. For we are our own masters; our own brute force; our own violent tyrant. With knowledge and without our voluntary servitude, we would be free from each other and thus from the church and State.
As just one example, let’s look at the declaration of emergency declared by President George W. Bush after the events of September 11, 2001, remembering that all emergency declarations are designed to do one thing – gain more legal written Executive authority outside of the constitution and need for Congressional or the people’s approval. Since a national emergency may only be declared for a maximum time of one year, according to the National Emergencies Act of 1976 (50 US CODE, Section 1622-d as amended), both Bush, Obama, and any future president(s) must re-declare that emergency in continuance in order to keep the “special or extraordinary power” claimed by that Executive Order. In this case, think Patriot Act; warrant-less searches and seizures, indefinite detention without trial, rendition, and a whole host of unlawful military privileges that make all citizens “enemies of the State”.
Nine years after 9/11, President Obama declared a continuation of Bush’s original National Emergency, as posted on the Whitehouse.gov Federal website:
“Letter from the President on the Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks”
September 10, 2010
Dear Madam Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:)
Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1622(d), provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. Consistent with this provision, I have sent to the Federal Register the enclosed notice, stating that the emergency declared with respect to the terrorist attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, is to continue in effect for an additional year.
The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on September 14, 2001, of a national emergency continues. For this reason, I have determined that it is necessary to continue in effect after September 14, 2010, the national emergency with respect to the terrorist threat.
Sincerely,
BARACK OBAMA
Now remember, this is a declaration of war against the emergency. In this case, we see the undefined and useful words terrorist and terrorism being declared the enemy.
Here is what Obama stated in one of his speeches regarding this fictitious international foe with no name:
“Our nation is at war against a far reaching network of violence and hatred…”
You may not realize it, but this is actually a bold-faced lie. You see, no war has officially been declared according to any of the rules of war or to the congressional approval process. This is because the United States corporation (not America) is in a perpetual state of undeclared war… not against an enemy or another nation, but against a word or two in an emergency declaration’s doctrine and articles. In other words, this is not a war against some specific people or governemnt, but against a status assigned to anyone the Executive sees fit. Are you a terrorist? Is growing a vegetable garden a terrorist act? How can you know the answers if the terrorist list is secret in the presidents secret government via Executive Privilege and sacred articles of war?
More importantly, when it comes to nation building and the violent spread of U.S. influence and debt, the fact that no war has been officially declared by congress means that the rules of war do not apply. Geneva Conventions are not considered. Human rights violations are not bound in any way because war has not been lawfully declared since World War II. And this, unfortunately, includes the entire world’s people both at home and abroad, for the office of a sovereign dictator as Corporation Sole knows no law and recognizes no borders, thanks to “the People” of congress.
In 2011, one year later, Obama continued yet again the state of national emergency declaring a “war on terror“:
“The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on September 14, 2001, of a national emergency continues. For this reason, I have determined that it is necessary to continue in effect after September 14, 2012, the national emergency with respect to the terrorist threat,”
–President Obama, September 11, 2011
For this to work – for the American people to accept this state of U.S. military rule of the world – the threat must be made to appear both external and internal. It must be invisible and yet visible in the news media, movies, and sitcoms (enter-tain-ment). And most horrifically, a show of blood and violence must be continuously exposed in ever more graphic detail to reinforce the illusion of an invisible and external threat.
For a much deeper understanding of this, please read my eye-opening essay about government sponsorship of its own terrorism against its own people from its own documentation, to promote fear in a war economy in times of peace (highly recommended):
This continuous state of multiple declarations of national emergency was speculated upon long ago as the road to dictatorship and martial law in America, again reading from within the congressional record:
“The President has the power to seize property, organize and control the means of production, seize commodities, assign military forces abroad, call reserve forces amounting to 2 1/2 million men to duty, institute martial law, seize and control all means of transportation, regulate all private enterprise, restrict travel, and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all Americans…
Most [of these laws] remain a potential source of virtually unlimited power for a President should he choose to activate them. It is possible that some future President could exercise this vast authority in an attempt to place the United States under authoritarian rule.
While the danger of a dictatorship arising through legal means may seem remote to us today (in 1973), recent history records Hitler seizing control through the use of the emergency powers provisions contained in the laws of the Weimar Republic.”
–Joint Statement, Senators Frank Church (D-ID) and Charles McMathias (R-MD) September 30, 1973.
–=–
Indeed, this doctrine of emergency can certainly be seen throughout history, where it was utilized for total control and power. For the origins of a “constitutional dictatorship” date back to the Roman law in that old Republic. And of course in rome the constitution and the rights of the people could also be temporarily suspended in wartime.
In France, the constitution was suspended under the declared “State of Siege”.
In Great Britain, the “Defense of the Realm Acts” allow that monarchy to suspend its subjects rights.
And in Germany, as mentioned above, Hitler certainly became a constitutional dictator when “Article 48” was invoked.
Here in the United States, we call it the “War Powers”. And those include the state of war on the declared national emergency.
(See the “War Powers Act”by author Eugene Schroeder and various other authors and researchers for an intimate walkthrough of how all of this happened, pre-dating Roosevelt and creating first all persons (citizens and non-citizens) as “enemies of the State”.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary describes perfectly what we the common people really are:
CHATTELS – property. A term which includes all kinds of property, except the freehold or things which are parcel of it. It is a more extensive term than goods or effects. Debtors taken in execution, captives, apprentices, are accounted chattels.
And again, who are the Debtors?
CONSTITUTOR – civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation.
For most Americans who are helplessly devoted to the idea of citizenship to the United States (constitutors), the thought that for their entire lives they have been under a military occupation without knowing it is offensive and even… yeah, you guessed it… SACRILEGE. For we are actually speaking of belief in the totally misunderstood American concepts of freedom, rights, and the constitution. And belief is the most powerful tool a government has in its mind control and enter-tain-ment of the people. For with belief comes hope – hope that things will get better if only the constitution was here – the great American fallacy.
Ironically, the proof is in the pudding. You see, the ability and power to declare martial law is in fact a sign that you already live under it! Martial law in peacetime is called military rule. In other words, if the president can declare martial law at any time as Commander in Chief of the military and national guard, this power can only be declared because military rule is already in place (see Liebor Code below).
Such simple and easy to understand logic trumped by ignorance and the arrogance of patriotism!
Without a military able to be called under one ruler (sovereign), there can be no martial law. Remember, law requires enforcement! And as long as the people cooperate with the President (government), the physical manifestation of the already existing president’s military rule will not be implemented as martial law – the violent enforcement of the sovereign.
As we read through a few of the sacred articles of the Lieber Code, the first thing we see is that a military base in each state (all 50 republics) represents most certainly the military rule of the United States as a “hostile army”. The problem lies in slapping people hard enough to make them realize that their military is indeed a hostile force that long ago invaded their State, not a protective force. For the military (army) protects the United States and its continuity, not the people for which that central government named as “enemies of the State”. No army is needed in times of peace, and yet there they are, occupying all States in the land of America (the spiritual jurisdiction of the United States as a spiritual corporation). Of course civilians are off limits in military bases. The military’s operations and records are secret and withheld from the people. The military is used to quell unrest in the streets of America (the military jurisdiction of the United States). And yet the people don’t believe they live in an occupied territory (States are merely Federal territories/possessions incorporated as political bodies or “States”).
My people truly are perishing because of their lack of knowledge…
Just what are the rules of the victors and the spoils of war?
The Lieber Code, which is recognized internationally as the Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field, or “General Orders 100” as signed by the president Abraham Lincoln as he invaded his own nation during the War of Northern Aggression (Civil War), states within its sacred articles that:
Article 1. A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the occupation, under the Martial Law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not. Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest.
The presence of a hostile army proclaims its Martial Law.
Article 2. Martial Law does not cease during the hostile occupation, except by special proclamation, ordered by the commander in chief; or by special mention in the treaty of peace concluding the war, when the occupation of a place or territory continues beyond the conclusion of peace as one of the conditions of the same.
(Note that no treaty or proclaimation has ever been issued ending both Lincolns and all other wars and occupations. In other words, peace has never been declared in America under the United States government.)
Article 3. Martial Law in a hostile country consists in the suspension, by the occupying military authority, of the criminal and civil law, and of the domestic administration and government in the occupied place or territory, and in the substitution of military rule and force for the same, as well as in the dictation of general laws, as far as military necessity requires this suspension, substitution, or dictation.
The commander of the forces may proclaimthat the administration of all civil and penal lawshall continue either wholly or in part, as in times of peace, unless otherwise ordered by the military authority.
Article 4.Martial Law is simply military authority exercised in accordance with the laws and usages of war. Military oppression is not Martial Law: it is the abuse of the power which that law confers. As Martial Law is executed by military force, it is incumbent upon those who administer it to be strictly guided by the principles of justice, honor, and humanity – virtues adorning a soldier even more than other men, for the very reason that he possesses the power of his arms against the unarmed.
(Note that Justice, Honor, and Humanity are Masonic principles.)
Article 5. Martial Law should be less stringent in places and countries fully occupied and fairly conquered. Much greater severity may be exercised in places or regions where actual hostilities exist, or are expected and must be prepared for. Its most complete sway is allowed – even in the commander’s own country – when face to face with the enemy, because of the absolute necessities of the case, and of the paramount duty to defend the country against invasion.
To save the country (continuity of corporate government)isparamount to all other considerations.
(Remember, the country is government, not the people under it. They are the enemy.)
Article 6.All civil and penal law shall continue to take its usual course in the enemy’s places and territories under Martial Law, unless interrupted or stopped by order of the occupying military power; but all the functions of the hostile government – legislative, executive, or administrative – whether of a general, provincial, or local character, cease under Martial Law, or continue only with the sanction, or, if deemed necessary, the participation of the occupier or invader.
(Here we see that our form of law appears the same under military rule, and violent martial law will not be implemented unless the civil law stops quelling the enemy (people) into submission.)
Article 7. Martial Law extends to property, and to persons, whether they are subjects of the enemy or aliens to that government…
Article 10.Martial Law affects chiefly the police and collection of public revenue and taxes, whether imposed by the expelled government or by the invader, and refers mainly to the support and efficiency of the army, its safety, and the safety of its operations…
(Here again we see why the education of the men and women in the Army (military) and police, in order to place honorable men there who will not enforce unlawful requests or laws of government, is paramount to ending this unlawful occupation of the Untied States. For the government needs force to apply its sovereign rule. Without it, the emperor would wear no cloths. This means that government would loose its incorporation as authority to rule. And of course this hilariously states that the people will be taxed to support their own people who act as soldiers in the army that is invading them… talk about self-imposed slavery!)
Article 12. Whenever feasible, Martial Law is carried out in cases of individual offenders by Military Courts; but sentences of death shall be executed only with the approval of the chief executive, provided the urgency of the case does not require a speedier execution, and then only with the approval of the chief commander.
Article 13.Military jurisdiction is of two kinds: First, that which is conferred and defined by statute; second, that which is derived from the common law of war. Military offenses under the statute law must be tried in the manner therein directed; but military offenses which do not come within the statute must be tried and punished under the common law of war. The character of the courts which exercise these jurisdictions depends upon the local laws of each particular country.
In the armies of the United States the first is exercised by courts-martial, while cases which do not come within the “Rules and Articles of War,” or the jurisdiction conferred by statute on courts-martial, are tried by military commissions.
(As discussed earlier, our soldiers and police take the oath to the president and to government and the constitution (which just happens to be “constitutionally” suspended), and not to the people and their protection. They follow the Sacred oath in their articles of war, which confer the jurisdiction of “god” through government and its sacramentum. All courts are military courts, even the civil courts, where judges and BAR members also take a similar oath not to the people in any way. The oath to the constitution and upholding it is not an oath to the people or to uphold ourselves. We know courts are military under this “Code” and simply by analyzing the force of law they subject the individual people to through the executive police and military forces. And we know know that civil law is a militarily enforced statutory code.)
Article 14.Military necessity, as understood by modern civilized nations, consists in the necessity of those measures which are indispensable for securing the ends of the war, and which are lawful according to the modern law and usages of war.
(Note here that the Presidential Executive declarations of emergency are also claimed to be a necessity, and are obviously enforced violently through military rule. And the emergency isn’t undeclared until its end (goal) is secured – securing the end of the war against the emergency.)
Article 15. Military necessity admits of all direct destruction of life or limb of armed enemies, and of other persons whose destruction is incidentally unavoidable(collateral damage) in the armed contests of the war; it allows of the capturing of every armed enemy, and every enemy of importance to the hostile government, or of peculiar danger to the captor; it allows of all destruction of property, and obstruction of the ways and channels of traffic, travel, or communication, and of all withholding of sustenance or means of life from the enemy; of the appropriation of whatever an enemy’s country affords necessary for the subsistence and safety of the army, and of such deception as does not involve the breaking of good faith either positively pledged, regarding agreements entered into during the war, or supposed by the modern law of war to exist. Men who take up arms against one another in public war do not cease on this account to be moral beings, responsible to one another and to God.
(As we read above, the president through emergency powers, Presidential Directives, and Executive Orders has clearly made Article 15 a reality. The term “enemy combatants” and “terrorists” are not just terms used for foreigners. To the United States corporation, all citizens of the United States are chattel and foreigners; literally and legally referred to as “enemies of the State” by U.S. Code under the “Trading With The Enemies Act”.)
Article 16. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty – that is, the infliction of suffering for the sake of suffering or for revenge, nor of maiming or wounding except in fight, nor of torture to extort confessions. It does not admit of the use of poison in any way, nor of the wanton devastation of a district. It admits of deception, but disclaims acts of perfidy; and, in general, military necessity does not include any act of hostility which makes the return to peace unnecessarily difficult.
(We, of course, live under the most deceptive legal system ever devised, utilizing elicit word magic and trickery, as permitted by the conquering military power of the United States and administered by the International Bar Association under the Executive Department of “Justice”. Again here we see a necessity established for justification of cruelty in fight. And the courts will decide what that means!)
Article 17. War is not carried on by arms alone. It is lawful to starve the hostile belligerent, armed or unarmed, so that it leads to the speedier subjection of the enemy.
(The starvation of white German soldiers and farmers after World War 2 killed vast amounts of men, women, and children after the war, as the U.S. and other Allied troops guarded and purposefully starved the innocent white Germanic peoples. Germany too, as well as Japan, is and has been under military rule since that second war. Keep in mind that under Executive Order, the president and his Cabinet have complete control over the production, manufacture, and distribution of food. Does starving you, your family, or your town or State really sound like a ridiculous concept right now? Well then, let’s read Article 18…)
Article 18. When a commander of a besieged place expels the noncombatants, in order to lessen the number of those who consume his stock of provisions, it is lawful, though an extreme measure, to drive them back, so as to hasten on the surrender.
(Here we only need to remember the fictions like “Brave New World” or the upcoming movie “Elysium”, where the poor common trash is held back and outside of the kingdom so as to protect the military enforced government and its city of cooperative slaves and elites and its commodity supply. Alphas, Betas, Deltas, Gammas, etc… those who will and will not bio-metrically take the Mark of the government Beast.)
Article 19. Commanders, whenever admissible, inform the enemy of their intention to bombard a place, so that the noncombatants, and especially the women and children, may be removed before the bombardment commences. But it is no infraction of the common law of war to omit thus to inform the enemy. Surprise may be a necessity…
(The Biological Weapons Program of the United States requires informed consent of the people and a journal entry in order for the United States to test biological weapons on the people. Of course, this is done covertly – for the people would absolutely never really allow themselves to be tested upon in such a way by their own permission. Whenever we hear of ATF raids like the Branch Davidions in Waco, Tx, we must realize that this is the hostile military of the United States (Washington D.C.) utilizing Article 19 as the necessity to kill innocent Americans; be they U.S. citizens or not, and including women and children. And heck, it makes for great enter-tain-ment on the TV to promote the need for the ATF and military!)
While we will not include the entire Code here, Section II reenforces the fact that in the United States’, its opinion of what constitutes the spoils of war, all property and corporate fiction persons belong to the occupying force of government – used as the god trust we discussed earlier…
SECTION II Public and private property of the enemy – Protection of persons, and especially of women, of religion, the arts and sciences – Punishment of crimes against the inhabitants of hostile countries.
Article 31. A victorious army appropriates all public money, seizes all public movable property until further direction by its government, and sequesters for its own benefit or of that of its government all the revenues of real property belonging to the hostile government or nation. The title to such real property remains in abeyance during military occupation, and until the conquest is made complete.
(Keep in mind that “public money” was gold and silver, otherwise known as “lawful money” back then. It still amazes me that when the occupying United States government forcibly confiscated under martial law all of the gold in America, that the people right then didn’t figure out that they were at war with their own government, or at least that their perception of their constitution and their free country was a lie. And for that matter, why hasn’t anyone figured this out till now??? Why do people still claim we live in a free country when our own government and banking history completely obliterates that belief?)
Article 32. A victorious army, by the martial power inherent in the same, may suspend, change, or abolish, as far as the martial power extends, the relations which arise from the services due, according to the existing laws of the invaded country, from one citizen, subject, or native of the same to another.
The commander of the army must leave it to the ultimate treaty of peace to settle the permanency of this change.
(So next time you find yourself complaining that government isn’t doing the job you elected it for, first remember that you didn’t elect your Federal Government in any way – you silly voter. Second, remember that the cancelling or suspension of taxpayer services is a sovereign right of that Electoral College-elected and Presidential appointed government under military rule by the Lieber Code. Thirdly, remember that taxpayer services are not the right of the people, but are privileges granted by the occupying government that is allowing you to live under its civil law until you wake up and see what martial law really looks, feels, and tastes like.)
You may read the entire Lieber Code and its history, as well as verify that it is still in effect, at these links:
In modern times, where up is down and left is right, the Lieber Code
has been mutated and re-imagined into current standards of
Jewish/Masonic “protocols”, articles, and codes. The use of unmanned
drones, says Mrs. Finkelstein, are perfectly moral in such an
Asymmetrical world of oppressive law where collateral damage
includes mothers… and especially little children.
–=–
“War is peace.”
–George Orwell–
–=–
“George Washington strove to be the embodiment of civilized conduct –
the calm amidst the storm — in the War of Independence.
Twenty years before, a French book had accused him of being a notorious
violator of the customs and usages of Enlightened warfare after
his actions in the Seven Years War between Britain and France.”
–Yale University Law Library website
–=–
Similar declared national emergencies are also in a state of yearly perpetual continuance via Executive Order, granting other extraordinary powers to the President with absolutely no real official objections from Congress. Here in this video, we see the re-declaration being read into the Federal Register in Congress, as required by Congress:
Note that this man isnot the asking for permission from congress. This is the actual informing of congress of something that already was approved by the president without congress, and thus gaining the “informed consent” of the “people” while legally fulfilling Congress’ requirement to comlete the entry of the emergency into the Federal Register.
You see, congress made this little legislative law that all but stripped itself of its own powers to stop such whims of the president by declaring, in the Act of March 9, 1933, Title 1, Section 1:
“The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are hereby approved and confirmed.”
It was thus altered to this:
“The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the amended [12 USC Sec. 95a], are hereby approved and confirmed. (Mar. 9, 1933, c. 1, Title 1, Sec. 1, 48 Stat, 1.)”
It is also used in Title 50, entitled “War And National Defense”.
These Executive “Orders” as stated above are approved before they are even known by congress or read into the record, for congress already gave their blessing for approval before President Obama was even born. Please understand that this section of U.S. Code has not been removed (voted away) by congress in the 80 years since it was created by them. This shows the cooperation of Congress with the Executive, especially within the government Federal Reserve banking scheme. For congress knows that all of the unlawful acts of the Executive and that central bank that Congress created would not be possible without the President’s war and emergency powers. The enforcer must be free to enforce without hindrance. Yet the illusion of “checks and balances” and adversarial proceedings between the Branches and Houses continues for the benefit of the people in media, who still believe in the constitution and its power to limit the president of that corporate United States. That’s silly of course, because the constitution is not alive. Only congress can take such an action, and only against itself! The paper is worthless without honorable men running the show.
Always remember, the Executive Branch is the enforcement arm of the law. So when the enforcers of law become the makers of the laws they enforce with no one to challenge them, the worst fears of Congressman James Beck and others as read in the congressional record above can certainly be said to have already been trumped.
–=–
President John F. Kennedy declared Executive Order 10995 in the year 1962. Today, that Executive Order has been tweaked, manipulated, and re-declared each year by each new president into what it is today.
And then there is the continuation by Barack Obama of a more than 20 year old emergency, of which “notice” was given on the Federal Whitehouse.gov website as follows:
NOTICE
– – – – – – –
CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION
On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, the President declared a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons (weapons of mass destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons. On July 28, 1998, the President issued Executive Order 13094 amending Executive Order 12938 to respond more effectively to the worldwide threat of weapons of mass destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, the President issued Executive Order 13382 which, inter alia, further amended Executive Order 12938 to improve our ability to combat proliferation. The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States; therefore, the national emergency first declared on November 14, 1994, and extended in each subsequent year, must continue. In accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12938, as amended.
This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.
–BARACK OBAMA
–=–
In 2009, Time Magazine reported:
“President Obama’s Oct. 24 decision to officially declare the H1N1 swine-flu virus a national emergency came with a speedy caveat: Don’t panic. The declaration was just a formality, the White House explained, a way to allow hospitals to circumvent unnecessary restrictions in order to bring about quicker, more effective swine-flu treatment.”
In other words, it allowed corporations to CIRCUMVENT THE LAW AND NATURAL HUMAN RIGHTS!
Don’t be fooled! Belittling the importance of what a declared state of emergency actually creates – military rule/martial law – is a classic tactic by government and the media to hide the significance of the fact that each President is in reality a legal dictator with an entire military and congress (representatives of “the people’) backing his every whim.
In another state of emergency originally declared by president Jimmy Carter on November 14, 1979 during the “Iranian Hostage Crisis”, we see a continuation with every president since, having been continuously renewed for now over thirty-four years, most recently by Barack Obama in November of 2012 continuing into 2013.
Of course the Iranian hostage situation is long over…
But it is the set of extraordinary powers and outrageous authorities conveyed in these emergency declarations that keeps them alive and re-declared, not the actual emergency itself.
And so as we delve further into this understanding of what government actually is, its origins in Masonry as a Deist theocratic nation and not a Christian one, and the contractual relationship we all play as “residents” and “citizens”, we must continuously strive not to forget the military nature of the enforcement of this Masonic theocracy and its laws under the Marshals of law (martial law) that has extended not only from 1933, but since the end of the Civil War. And let’s face it, the massacring of tribes and peoples throughout history by the military forces of the Church and State has always been declared to be necessary as a holy mission to protect God’s kingdom of government on earth as ruled by the bloodline Monarchs and presidents.
–=– Fin –=–
This brings us to the end of Part I of this “Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution” series.
But before we go, let’s have a look at that definition of religion again:
Religion:
“Man’s relation to Divinity, to reverence, worship, obedience, and submission to mandates and precepts of supernatural or superior beings. In its broadest sense includes all forms of belief in the existence of superior beings exercising power over human beings by volition, imposing rules of conduct, with future rewards and punishments. Bond uniting man to GOD, and a virtue whose purpose is to render GOD worship due him as source of all being and principle of all government of things“
–Black’s Law: 5th Edition
Do these precepts start to make sense now? Do you understand the theocracy that is the U.S. govern-ment? And do you now understand that “Man’s relation to Divinity” is, according to the church, his relation to government?
The culmination of the above research pales in comparison with what I have to show you next. And I know that at this point you will certainly have at least a few unanswered questions that will certainly be answered in parts two and three. For as we delve into the true history of the founding of this country; utilizing such tools as the Masonic Bible, the personal writings of the Masonic founders and presidents, a vast pictorial archive, and other inconvenient facts from our hidden history, all of your questions and doubts will be hopefully be satisfied.
I thank you for making it this far, and will be posting part two as soon as I can make it available. Already it has blown my mind with just the 100’s of images I’ve collected.
If you are a member of an organization that begins to do things you don’t like, the rational course of action would be to withdraw your financial support to that organization and cease to be a member.
If your bank misbehaves or charges you ridiculous extra fees just because it can according to your “agreement” with the bank, the rational course of action would be to withdraw your financial support and cease to be a customer.
If your insurance coverage starts to diminish in quality or denies you your due benefits or coverage when you need it, the rational course of action would be to withdraw your financial support to that company and cease to be a member.
If my doctor or hospital began to practice bad medicine and cause more illness than it cured, the rational course of action would be to withdraw financial support to that hospital or doctor and cease to be a customer, and perhaps pursue alternative healing.
In fact, when we consider this repetitive logic, wouldn’t anyone be hard-pressed to think of any thing that might mistreat us as a member or customer that would not warrant the withdraw of financial support and termination of contract or membership?
So why then are people still voluntary members of the United States central government?
Do they enjoy the thought of future bad healthcare – which is really the quite unlawful forced commerce with insurance companies and not actual healthcare? If their membership to a corporation that gives them “benefits” suddenly forces them to accept bad medicine and bad insurance, isn’t the simple solution to end their membership to the main corporation?
Do the people enjoy paying taxes and unjust extortion fees and taxes for non-crimes just so that government can invest that money for itself without offering any benefit back to the people? Would it not be prudent to end that kind of business “relationship” with such a bad business?
Do people really believe that the meager benefit of “old-age insurance” called social security (socialism) is worth the vast amount of legal restrictions and tyrannies set forth upon them through their entire life – even when they could have invested their own money and walked away with double or triple what this administration will ever pay them – should they actually live through Obama-care? Do the people even know that there is no actual trust in their name – just a large investment fund that has been completely tapped for the national debt with no legal requirement to ever pay them anything? Do they know the difference between investing for themselves and their future and contributing (giving away) their hard-earned money to government? Do they realize where their money goes as government invests it into war, Monsanto, pharmaceuticals, and Think tanks?
Is there some misconception that being a “citizen” is somehow patriotic – that withdrawing their citizenship (membership) will make them less “American”?
Really? Because last time I checked, it was called the United States of America, not America of the United States.
Was there created at some point in history the fallacy that America is the central government called the United States – a 10 mile square municipal corporation that is not even one of the actual 50 states in the “union” ? Do the people actually believe that America is the United States?
Perhaps that misconception derives from the misunderstanding of just what citizenship is.
For citizenship is simply a membership, be it voluntary or forced through coercion and martial law, unilaterally agreed to by an individual. It is no different than a gym membership; where you must follow the rules set out in your agreement contract that only you sign. Like the government, the gym does not sign your contract. It is simply an agreement for membership to enjoy some benefits, as well as an agreement for you to follow their rules.
But what happens when the rules change without your consent?
What happens when the benefits diminish?
For instance, each state is a member of the Untied States, forced to hand over their unappropriated lands to the United States and draft new State constitutions after the Civil War under “reconstruction” and after agreeing to the terms of uniform “enabling acts” under duress. In fact, the civil war was nothing but a military takeover by a defunct central government under martial law of the lawfully succeeded sovereign states. They were forced back into contract membership with the new central government, one that was unlawfully created absent of the lawful participation of these states’ lawful congressmen. In their stead, military martial officers of law were forced into congress to replace the lawfully elected congressmen of each state. And under duress and at gunpoint, these states became members of this municipal corporation in Washington D.C, eventually dividing the entire territory of America into counties within states.
COUNTY. A district into which a state is divided.
2. The United States are generally divided into counties; counties are divided into townships or towns…
4. In some states, as Illinois; 1 Breese, R. 115; a county is considered as a corporation, in others it is only a quasi corporation.
5. In the English law this word signifies the same as shire, county being derived from the French and shire from the Saxon. Both these words signify a circuit or portion of the realm, into which the whole land is divided, for the better government thereof, and the more easy administration of justice. There is no part of England that is not within some county, and the shire-reve, (sheriff) originally a yearly officer, was the governor of the county. Four of the counties of England, viz. Lancaster, Chester, Durham and Ely, were called counties Palatine, which were jurisdictions of a peculiar nature, and held by, especial charter from the king. See stat. 27 H. VIII. c.25.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. Certain officers generally entrusted with the superintendence of the collection of the county taxes, and the disbursements made for the county. They are administrative officers, invested by the local laws with various powers.
***All legal definitions taken from Bouvier’s Law Dictioanry, 1856
Counties are nothing but municipal corporations; a network grid of contract issuers and enforcers for the United States government – acting under administrate local law with federal powers. Another word for administrative is contract. And all administrative law is simply the administration of the unilateral contractual relationship with you and government. The county has police officers. The gym has security guards. There is no difference. Police officers are just security guards for the county corporation. They’re authority is presumed, just as your citizenship that might grant them contractual authority over you is presumed.
UNILATERAL CONTRACT, civil law. When the party to whom an engagement is made, makes no express agreement on his part, the contract is called uni-lateral, even in cases where the law attaches certain obligations to his acceptance… A loan of money, and a loan for use, are of this kind.
One does not generally think of government as just another customer-based corporation, but this is exactly what it is. When signing a unilateral agreement (contract), one agrees to follow a certain set of de facto corporate rules and regulations (codes) as set out by government. This is the voluntary state of citizenship – a series of unilateral contractual agreements signed or unsigned (presumption of law) by the people of America.
This circumstance of multiple contractual obligations is often called the STRAWMAN, which is simply the “person” as defined and bound by these contracts. The “person” is artificial, as defined in US Code and the 14th Amendment (see below). The person is a corporate veil of the man, used for the purposes of contracts. And in administrative law, government can only contract with this artificial person. Government cannot regulate man, only the corporate person. Thus, administrative law has nothing to do with and no authority over living man, unless he or she is acting under the commercial activities described within their contractual relationship with government.
A driver’s license, for instance, is a unilateral contractual agreement by one man to follow the State government’s vehicle code, which is administrative law. Driving is administratively speaking a commercial activity. Thus, driving can be regulated by government… but only if the man agrees to become a commercial person while utilizing his automobile. He does this when he unilaterally agrees for no reason at all to agree with government that he is utilizing his car as a commercial “vehicle”, even when dropping the kids off at school. Even if that car is never used for any purpose in commerce pr commercial activities, the government still elicits people to obtain a commercial license to drive.
You see, this is the only way that government can have authority over you. It must trick you into entering into some agreement and contract for which you give your consent to its authority. Without this unilateral agreement, government cannot rule you and regulate every part of your life. It must convince you that the activities you participate in are within its authority as a legal activity before it can tell you they are illegal. And it must lie to you so as to convince you that using your car to travel is illegal unless you have a license to do so. For a license is nothing more than permission from government to do something illegal. In other words, every time you get into your vehicle and drive you are breaking the law by permission.
Though traveling in your personal automobile is not unlawful, driving commercially without a license is illegal – a breach of contract.
Perhaps most ironic about all of this is the simple realization that all of this contractual relationship nonsense is based on one and only one thing – your membership with the United States corporation in Washington D.C. This is the central hub of information. It is where your official artificial person is stored and maintains residence. And states and counties are just subdivisions of that corporation – artificial borders signifying United States jurisdiction, assigned federal locator codes called ZIP codes that are property of the United States. For the U.S. Postal Service is part of the United States corporation in Washington D.C. Your United States mail is not delivered to your home, it is delivered to your commercial address within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
You must never forget that all of your commercial activities are being done inside of the United States jurisdiction – the artificial corporate veil that extends throughout the 50 states and beyond like a spider web, ensnaring the activities people like flies and spinning them into commercial persons.
Imagine in your mind that the entire land of America has a plastic coating over it for which all people walk upon as corporate persons and citizens of the United States, never really comprehending that this clear plastic coating of corporate person-hood separates their natural body from the natural land. The people walk and talk on this corporate veil of clear plastic as if it doesn’t exist and as if they are walking on the actual land – which ironically is a true statement. For corporatism is indeed artificial, just as the artificial person replaces the man in his or her transactions with the corporation government, so to does the United States replace the land of America with its veil of artificial person-hood called statutes and codes.
Yet just on the other side of this artificial construct lies the natural world, natural law, and all of the natural rights that existed before the people contractually agreed to give them up for government granted political rights. For tyranny and oppression is literally the contractual right of citizens of the United States.
For a deeper understanding of what a right actually is (and this reality will certainly surprise you), please take the time to study my expose’ here:
Perhaps this love affair with citizenship stems from the fallacious belief that the United States is still the same old sovereign county it was when it was founded, before the civil war tore it apart and the defunct and unlawful United States glued it back together with legal tape and military oppression?
Well, I’ve got some bad news for you folks…
The United States is now a member of the United Nations… and the United States is referred to as a “sovereign state” by that international central government. Just like the states under contractual membership with the United States corporation in Washington D.C. are not referred to as “countries”, the 193 countries of the world under membership of the United Nations corporation are also not called “countries”. And it is not the people or the 50 states that are members of the United Nations, it is just this 10 mile square piece of land called the United States corporation that is a member.
So can a sovereign individual state be a member of such a central government and still be sovereign? And can a sovereign nation then still be sovereign as a member of an international government under international maritime and admiralty (military) law?
The United Nations doctrine for “statehood” rings familiar, sounding very much like the false paradigm of the rules of “statehood” for the 50 states in the United States of America:
The dominant customary international law standard of statehood is the declarative theory of statehood that defines the state as a person of international law if it “possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states.” Debate exists on the degree to which recognition should be included as a criterion of statehood. The declarative theory of statehood, an example of which can be found in the Montevideo Convention, argues that statehood is purely objective and recognition of a state by other states is irrelevant. On the other end of the spectrum, the constitutive theory of statehood defines a state as a person under international law only if it is recognized as sovereign by other states. For the purposes of this list, included are all states that either:
(a) have declared independence and are often regarded as having control over a permanently populated territory
or
(b) are recognised as a sovereign state by at least one other sovereign state
The word-magic here involves the concept that the “state” has “declared independence” and has “control over a permanently populated area”.
This is of course the United States. It, as a central incorporated government, has declared independence that no one dare challenge due to its military might. The once sovereign states now pledged as collateral for this corporation, its debts, and its “good faith and credit” are considered nothing but legal territories of the United States in the legal realm through this contractual and constitutional relationship. The governments of the individual state territories of the United States are still military in nature, each one occupied by the United States’ military and its bases, which under the Libor Code represents military rule.
In other words, the presence of a military base in your State is stated in law to signify military rule under martial law. These bases are not just for your protection, they are for your control. They are the occupying forces of the United States, left over from the same forces that occupied each State during the Civil War. They are the United States corporation’s military – the military of Washington D.C. – not the American or state militia. They protect the United States from all threats both foreign and domestic, and that includes the people of America and the 50 states. The military ensures the continuity of this 10 mile square municipal corporation and its military rule over the 50 states and other insular possessions. The United States is legally in possession of us!
And each state is governed militarily by a “governor”, whom in Canada is referred to as “Governor General”, and who is the ex officio Commander-in-Chief of the State National Guard of His State unless called in total by the President as (CIC) of the United States. This military position of Governor as commander of a military force is followed by a whole list of military positions…
Lieutenant Governor
Attorney General
Solicitor General
Insurance Commissioner – i.e. military commissions Superintendents – The commanding officer of the United States Military Academy is its Superintendent.
State Controller Officers of the court
Police Officers Employees of Commissions and Authorities
All of these titles represent rule by military force.
OFFICER. He who is lawfully invested with an office.
2. Officers may be classed into, 1. Executive; as the president of the United States of America, the several governors of the different states. Their duties are pointed out in the national constitution, and the constitutions of the several states, but they are required mainly to cause the laws to be executed and obeyed.
3. – 2. The legislative; such as members of congress; and of the several state legislatures. These officers are confined in their duties by the constitution, generally to make laws, though sometimes in cases of impeachment, one of the houses of the legislature exercises judicial functions, somewhat similar to those of a grand jury by presenting to the other articles of impeachment; and the other house acts as a court in trying such impeachments. The legislatures have, besides the power to inquire into the conduct of their members, judge of their elections, and the like.
OFFICE. An office is a right to exercise a public function or employment, and to take the fees and emoluments belonging to it…
2. Offices may be classed into civil and military.
TAKE. This is a technical expression which signifies to be entitled to; as, a devisee will take under the will. To take also signifies to seize, as to take and carry away…
CIVIL. This word has various significations. 1. It is used in contradistinction to barbarous or savage, to indicate a state of society reduced to order and regular government; thus we speak of civil life, civil society, civil government, and civil liberty.
2. It is sometimes used in contradistinction to criminal, to indicate the private rights and remedies of men, as members of the community, in contrast to those which are public and relate to the government; thus we speak of civil process and criminal process, civil jurisdiction and criminal jurisdiction.
3. It is also used in contradistinction to military or ecclesiastical, to natural or foreign; thus we speak of a civil station, as opposed to a military or ecclesiastical station; a civil death as opposed to a natural death; a civil war as opposed to a foreign war.
So what does all this mean?
Consider for a moment just what the term “civil war” actually represents. As with the United States Civil War, we find that it was indeed fought to ensure the forced continuity of the United States government. It was not so much a war as it was an invasion. And it was fought to ensure that the people under martial law went along with that government who did not wish to.
To make the contradistinction between the words military and civil is almost a mute point. For a “civil society” under “civil law” cannot be accomplished without force of a military entity – which is the executive branch of government (now the Department Of Defense – as in defense of the realm).
For instance, the U.S. District Courts operate with no authority to actually enforce their decisions. Thus the power of the courts lie in the connection it has to the Executive Branch of that area. This is the true importance of the County Sheriff, for the Sheriff is the Executive power of all the courts within that county. The Sheriff’s Department man’s these courts (bailiffs, etc.), who operate under his authority. Of course, the Sheriff would have little power without the decisions and warrants issued by the courts. In a lawful society this would be referred to as a check and balance, creating a restraint of unreasonable power or influence by either entity. But when unlawful men occupy these offices as persons of the militarized United States under its authority and jurisdiction, the law becomes lawless and the powers of corruption go unchecked.
In essence, this relationship between the judicial and the executive is symbiotic in nature, where alone each office and officer would have no lawful power. But together they become the law, both written and enforced. The cowardly attorney’s in black robes called judges hide behind their pulpits and gavels while the Sheriff hides behind his badge and gun, while each gives authority to the other. Neither takes responsibility for their own actions, because they have been allowed to operate as artificial persons under limited liability incorporation. And they protect each other from legal action as one derives power unjustly from the other.
If lawful men took over either office, refusing to enforce the power and authority of the other, and taking responsibility for their own actions outside of the color of law, the people would have little to fear from their government. But lawful men such as these generally end up dead or imprisoned by the very entity they represent.
On the national level, the President of the United States acts as the Commander In Chief of his executive army, carrying out the legislative and judicial law presented to it. Congress, like the judicial, has no power to enforce its created statutes and codes (judicial opinions for courts) without the enforcement arm of the Executive Branch. A law or decision without force carries no weight, especially from men with no honor.
In other words, the legal system of the United States is solely based on the force and coercion of the executive government to carry out the political laws created by congress. The local and state governments operate under the authority of the United States, for they are just corporations as extensions of that federal government corporation.
Congress created the court system and the Supreme Court, which derives its authority and jurisdiction from that body politic.This is an important fact because this means that the entire system of corporate administrative courts across the country are statutory in nature – created by congress and not the constitution itself, and operating under the authority and jurisdiction of the United States corporation. To put it simply, this means that the courts are operating under private corporate law without lawful authority. That is, unless you consent to that authority as a private corporate person – a member of the United States corporation. Just like the gym example, this private law only applies to members of the United States.
This creation of the court system was done by Congress in the Judiciary Act of 1789:
–=–
The Judiciary Act of 1789
September 24, 1789.
1 Stat. 73.
CHAP. XX. – An Act to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States.
SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the supreme court of the United States shall consist of a chief justice and five associate justices, any four of whom shall be a quorum, and shall hold annually at the seat of government two sessions, the one commencing the first Monday of February, and the other the first Monday of August. That the associate justices shall have precedence according to the date of their commissions, or when the commissions of two or more of them bear date on the same day, according to their respective ages…
The authority and jurisdiction of these statutory courts only applies to citizens (members) of the United States.
Some people also refer to citizens as “employees” of the Untied States, which is not incorrect. Congressmen (representatives and senators) are also “employees” of the United States corporation, but are officially called “Members”. And we can read above that judges and justices are “commissioned” as employees.
All of these men are acting as artificial persons of the United States, for there is no natural law or natural rights under civil and administrative law because only political law exists there – abeyance by force of contract. This is the very definition of military rule. And every time a citizen does not obey the law, the militarized executive branch steps in to force either compliance, incarceration, or death.
Murder is unlawful and illegal, but government gives license to commit this illegal act – a license to kill. It is interesting to note that government only acknowledges the “civil death” of a person, not the bloody and violent taking of the life of a man.
CIVIL DEATH, persons. The change of the state of a person who is declared civilly dead by judgment of a competent tribunal. In such case, the person against whom such sentence is pronounced is considered dead.
It is interesting to note here that just as a living or natural man cannot have a civil death but only a natural one, the word “perish” does not apply to persons, as artificial persons never existed as a living things but only as contractual things in legal code:
TO PERISH. To come to an end; to cease to be; to die.
2. What has never existed cannot be said to have perished…
You see, an artificial person (corporation) never actually exists in nature, so it cannot have a natural death.
So it is perhaps the best definition of civil law for me to say that:
Civil law is the state of non-necessity of martial law while under military rule, because the governed are not acting in civil disobedience.
Martial law is the physical manifestation of force and violence via government decree to ensure the continuity of military rule that is visible and obvious (violent) to all people.
And military rule is simply the current state of a system of de facto United States corporate law based on coercion, force, and occasional violence, which is sugar-coated and masked under the appearance of civility and under the guise of “civil law”.
Civil law and military rule, therefore, are all but indistinguishable. They are both systems of law enacted by forced compliance of the Executive Branch of government. In both systems, the laws they tout are ensured by force. And in both instances, a man’s natural rights are struck down in lieu of positive or political rights.
It is ironic and disturbing then to point out the now obvious paradox of a subjected people in an occupied land…
For it would only be through open revolt and total disobedience of the current laws of the United States central government that the above facts could manifest themselves as self evident. This axiom of military rule is invisible to the civil servants and citizens of government, no differently than the subjects of a king might never consider that they are at all times under military rule – the rule by force of a tyrant – no matter how fair or just that king seems to be.
This kingdom called the United States – the District that reigns the lands of America through contractual membership under force of its own law despite being a foreign corporate entity outside of those lands – holds the reigns to millions of soldiers; obedient Americans conscripted by their own enemy through contract as security guards for the United States. And these soldiers, in their belief that they are fighting for America, will no doubt blindly follow this United States corporation into oblivion no differently than did those useful fools that killed father, brother, and child in that great United States Civil War – “The War Of Northern Aggression“.
Perhaps a more fitting title to that Civil War and to all wars proceeding it would read: “The Unending War Of Continued United States Aggression, Both Foreign and Domestic“.
Now you might think that Congress is there to redress grievances of the people to the United States government as representatives thereof. But oh what a tangled web they weave…
Congressmen are “employees” of the United States government, according to TITLE 5 of U.S. CODE.
So this would be like expecting a mid-level management employee of Walmart to change the policies of Walmart’s CEO and board of directors. Employees have no individual say on what happens in the United States corporation. So a single representative is worthless without the agreement of the vast majority of the entire body of representatives.
And of course the people represented in these congressional districts never seem to realize that the business affairs of Congress only happen inside of Washington D.C. – in other words outside of their State. Just as employees of Walmart have no authority outside of the corporate jurisdiction of Walmart, neither do the congressmen and Senators have power in the 50 individual States as republics. They are the Representatives of the Federal Government to the people, not the representatives of the people to the Federal Government. They conduct only Federal business in the jurisdiction of the United States, even while doing so in the States they hold domicile. They are United States Employees, not State Employees. In fact, they have absolutely no power within the State government, except those imposed by force by the Federal Central government as a whole.
So why do the people contractually volunteer to give up their power to a bunch of known-to-be-corrupt representatives as employees of the very entity that enslaves them, instead of leaving this horrific militarized club called the United States by withdrawing legal membership?
Perhaps it is the misconception that our membership (citizenship) is not a choice.
But wait a minute, you say. Isn’t it my “constitutional right” to be a citizen?
That’s an interesting question, actually. In fact, the concept of “citizenship” as it stands today was not part of the original constitution. Citizenship was created after the “country” was placed under military rule (martial law) under the Libor Code and General Orders 100. It was in this reconstruction period after the “Civil War” that was created reconstruction amendment #14.
The 14th Amendment states:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside…”
Whereas before this amendment was ratified by the now unlawful military congress the concept of citizenship was based on the blood of the man in question in a natural sense, the United States now took on a corporate disposition and changed the presumption of citizenship into a legally binding contractual duty; where all people became artificial persons as individual corporate bodies politic within the United States’ web of corporatism.
The most overlooked word in this amendment to the constitution is the word “subject”:
SUBJECT, contracts. The thing which is the object of an agreement. This term is used in the laws of Scotland.
SUBJECT, persons, government. An individual memberof a nation, who is subject to the laws; this term is used in contradistinction to citizen, which is applied to the same individual when considering his political rights.
2. In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch. Vide Body politic
NATIONALITY. The state of a person in relation to the nation in which he was born.
2. A man retains his nationality of origin during his minority, but, as in the case of his domicil of origin, he may change his nationality upon attaining full age; he cannot, however, renounce his allegiance without permission of the government. See Citizen; Domicile; Expatriation; Naturalization…
NATIONS. Nations or states are independent bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength.
2. But every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation; a body of pirates, for example, who govern themselves, are not a nation. To constitute a nation another ingredient is required. The body thus formed must respect other nations in general, and each of their members in particular. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights…
3. It belongs to the government to declare whether they will consider a colony which has thrown off the yoke of the mother country as an independent state; and until the government have decided on the question, courts of justice are bound to consider the ancient state of things as remaining unchanged.
In the Civil War, it would be a foregone conclusion to state that the United States did not accept (as it was lawfully required to do via its own charter) the secession of the confederate states – the yolks that threw themselves from the mother country. Instead, it acted unlawfully by all standards of ethics and natural law – a military conquest being the result – forcing the confederate states to be captured as prisoners of war and to accept the new reorganized United States and its new corporate constitution as their new sovereign tyrant.
COUNTRY. By country is meant the state of which one is a member.
2. Every man’s country is in general the state in which he happens to have been born, though there are some exceptions. See Domicil; Inhabitant. But a man has the natural right to expatriate himself, i. e. to abandon his country, or his right of citizenship acquired by means of naturalization in any country in which he may have taken up his residence. See Allegiance; Citizen; Expatriation…
Remember, the United Nations refers to the United States as a state that is a member of the U.N, just as the United States refers to its own 50 States that are supposedly independent but members of that body.
But more importantly one must understand the distinction made here of being “born in the country of the United States”.
Though a man may be born in the State of Georgia, his residence is created within the jurisdiction of the United States – that incorporated legal boundry that extends across the entirety of the territories called “states” and beyond. In essence, when a man is born in the United States, it is his artificial person that is civilly born, creating a citizen.
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United Statesand of the State wherein they reside…”
Again, this very important distinction must be made…
Though you physically are born in and reside within a State, the artificial representation of you called a legal “person” and a “citizen” is civilly born in and resides within the jurisdiction of the United States. Registered persons/citizens who vote are actually voting in the artificial representation of Washington D.C. – the jurisdiction that extends from that central district 10 miles square over the entire “country” through contract. Your home is a registered United States home. Your vehicle is a registered United States vehicle. Your children are registered United States persons. And all of these contractual agreements can be utilized to take these things away from citizens. In fact, it is the political and constitutional right of all citizens to have their registered property of the United States taken away from them. Just read the 5th Amendment very carefully… for it tells you clearly that through the United States court system under what it calls “due process”, you life, liberty, and property can be taken from you (see definition of take above).
In this way, it is correct to say that for the most part, the actual individual states are empty – abandoned by all the people who became residents of the United States in Washington D.C. – for the people all reside in the United States, and the States are territories of the United States. The people walk as persons upon the plastic coating of United States jurisdiction, never touching the natural land. Of course the illusion of States rights still exists among the citizens of the United States, who have no idea they are under the military rule of this foreign corporation, and who do not comprehend the true nature of the word person or citizen.
In the United States corporation…
Citizenship is granted, not taken;
Citizenship is legal and political, not lawful and natural;
Citizenship is contractual, not moral;
Citizenship is a voluntary membership, not a mandatory requirement.
Citizenship is artificial and un-American!!!
Perhaps the natural born citizens of the United States should be asking themselves why this so-called privilege and natural right of citizenship is being tossed to the wind and bestowed to those who did not naturally and traditionally gain it? The fact that citizenship can be contractually bestowed upon anyone who is contractually willing to receive or pay for all of the benefits and tyranny that accompanies such a legal status should be enough for anyone to realize that its conveyance has nothing to do with anything but a contractual tie to the military rule of government. This once honorable title of men is now just a corporate slogan to sell monopolized, for-profit government products and services to ignorant persons at non-competative prices.
Take the influx of what we call “illegal immigrants” as a clue as to how America became a militarized corporate slave machine:
The Pew Hispanic Center determined that according to an analysis of Census Bureau data about 8 percent of children born in the United States in 2008 — about 340,000 — were offspring of unauthorized immigrants. In total, about four million American-born children of unauthorized immigrant parents resided in this country in 2009, along with about 1.1 million foreign-born children of unauthorized immigrant parents. The Center for Immigration Studies – a think tank which favors stricter controls on immigration—claims that between 300,000 and 400,000 children are born each year to illegal immigrants in the U.S.
These are “natural born” children (citizens) just like you according to your representatives in government, for citizens are no longer required to have honor to join the “country”. And soon over 11 million non-natural born invading immigrants will join the party when the United States says it’s just alright.
Citizenship means nothing to an honorable man. It is just a ticket to ride on the slave-ship. It is the act of selling ones soul to acquire artificial things. And it has become a pour substitute for a once-cherished thing. Most importantly, it does not make you an American, just a useful pawn in a collective extortion racket designed to create corporate authority by making all the people into one collective tool to extract their individual power and intent as one lone consenting voice for the actions of an unlawful corporation. And every unlawful action by government is based on the informed consent it presumes from its members.
Isn’t it time to rebut that presumption of consent and take back our individual voices and power as individual men?
So let’s say that you are a member of an exclusive golf club that only allows people just like you to enter. You retain a membership to this club because you wish to be a part of something special and be around like-minded individuals who contribute and benefit from this club and its rules and regulations, as well as its exclusivity and respect. And you stay a member because this club operates legitimately and lawfully with full respect to nature and to all involved.
But then let’s say that your club is taken over and its rules for membership changed.
Suddenly, this club is full of men, women and children (persons) who are not like-minded in any way and who do not respect in any way your methods, opinions, lifestyle, morals, ethics, values, and so on. And then the club management passes rules and regulations that require you to integrate, hire as employees, and tolerate all of these new members – lest you be fined and imprisoned for discrimination and your corporation terminated and its assets seized by government. (Note: This is what E-Verify does.)
Would not the proper response be to immediately end your membership with that club and either find a more lawful club or start your own exclusive one?
The club only seeks to collect more and more revenue and fees from these new members, in order to both generate more revenue and to control more and more of the population by forcing its registration of all things and children. So why would anyone stay as a member of that club only to be forced to tolerate a cultural invasion and complete change in the standards of that club? Why would you continue to financially support that club’s central governing body when everything it does goes against your ideals and values?
So why do you continue to stay a member of the United States club?
It’s not a requirement! It’s not necessary for you to work and live in America and in a State. This beast’s Social Security number is not needed for anything at all. And it certainly isn’t helping you to stay a member, unless you consider tyranny, unjust taxation without representation, pain, punishment, and extortion your political right like government does.
We complain, we scream, we weep, and we suffer. And all because we believe that we must stay members of this corporation that continuously harms us. We accept the mark and the number of this beast because we believe it is for the greater good. We support its illegal wars and pay for them with our voluntary taxes. It doesn’t listen or care about us as anything but commodities, because a corporation only cares about growth (expansion) and profits. It sells our labor and bonds our incarceration. It takes all and gives nothing.
So why are you still a citizen of this 10 mile square corporation that seeks to control every aspect of your life through your voluntary contractual obligation? Isn’t it time to pull the plug and stop financially supporting its exaction tactics to extort your money and estate?
Isn’t it time to take back your registered United States property and place it back into your personal possession, including your children?
Or are a few non-guaranteed benefits at the expense of future generations (your children and theirs) more important than being free?
Do you really think it would be un-American to withdraw your membership to this corporation that isn’t even part of America?
Since the concept of being an American seems to have been blurred between the natural and the contractual, perhaps we should end here with a quote from the most American thing I can think of…
“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security…”
–Declaration of Independence
.
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, May 18th, 2013
All legal definitions taken from Bouvier’s Law Dictioanry, 1856:
Episode 3, for your listening enjoyment. This is my interview with Vicky Davis, writer and researcher of ChannelingReality.com
I highly recommend that you read the following information (below) before or after listening to this interview, for I believe it is one of my most important research projects yet in uncovering the true nature of the United States. Also, please watch the two videos at the end, for a glimpse of the future of mankind and America…
What does it mean to you when someone says “fight for your country”?
For some, the concept of just what a “country” is becomes blurred between two completely different things. While the conversational term for country usually defines the living people, the physical land, and the fictional government together in one neat package, the fact is that these things are quite different from one another, and are only connected through ink and consent of those living people as a “body politic”.
The “land” – the real and tangible thing we call home – is indeed not legally the “country”. Living men are also not legally the country.
The country is in fact a reamed folder of legal papers, notarized and signed by the appropriate members of a corporate “federation” called the United States. It’s borders are demarcated within this paperwork, but these too are not part of the actual physical land. It sets its own rules, changes those rules with the signing of a pen, and does so without the will of the people.
The land and the living people who inhabit it are called a country – a body politic – but only in a legal sense. The people, in order to inhabit this artificial country legally as “residents”, must also become artificial. They must become persons through contract so as to be part of (citizens) of this legal “country”.
“A “federation” is by definition an unincorporated entity, but a “federated” entity is corporated. A “union” of states is not a corporate entity, but that the “United” States is a corporation.”
Confused? You are supposed to be.
Instead of taking my word for it, I wonder what the government, the courts, and the Supreme Court thinks?
“Persons dealing with the government are charged with knowing government statutes and regulations, and they assume the risk that government agents may exceed their authority and provide misinformation,” –Lavin v. Marsh, 644 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1981), 644 F.2d, at 1383.
“Whatever the form in which the government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes a risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of the limitations upon his authority.” –Federal Crop Insurance v. Merrill, Supreme Court, 332 U.S. 380
From the West LegalEdcenter’s Securities Litigation Report:
“Twenty-first century finance knows no true geographic borders. Money and risk can move around the globe with a touch of a button. Sober evidence of this was AIG’s swaps affiliate, AIG Financial Products, which had its major operations in London. When it failed, the U.S. economy and taxpayers shouldered a tremendous burden.
The current debt crisis in Europe is but a stark reminder of our interconnectedness. Moreover, it is precisely during times of heightened market uncertainty that transparent pricing of risk is essential. While European leaders are working to avert a deepening crisis, it is critical that we implement the Dodd-Frank Act to protect the American public.
We are actively consulting and coordinating with international regulators to promote robust and consistent standards in swaps oversight. We are sharing many of our memos, term sheets and draft work product with international regulators. Building on these efforts, I will be traveling to London to discuss derivatives reform as well as issues relating to high-frequency trading.
We also will work with international colleagues on memoranda of understanding for access to information and cooperative oversight. We also have a long history of recognizing foreign regulatory regimes. The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the CFTC to recognize foreign regulatory frameworks that are comprehensive and comparable to U.S. oversight of the swaps markets in certain areas. We also anticipate seeking public input on the application of Section 722(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which says that the law doesn’t apply to activities outside the United States unless those activities have a direct and significant connection with activities in, or effect on, U.S. commerce.“
So, let’s get this straight… The Dodd-Frank Act was a tool by Congress to prohibit one of government’s regulatory corporations (the Commodities Futures Trading Commission – CFTC) to act outside of United States jurisdiction as long as the activities to be regulated are outside of the United States? Yes sir. But the reality of what this means is even more shocking. For when the term “outside of the United States” is utilized here, it is referring to United States borders (remember, they are paper borders created by treaty and international agreements). This is where “Inland Ports” and “Foreign Trade Zones” come into play. This is how your “country” (both the land and the government) is incrementally being pulled out from under your feet – while American Idol agonizingly plays in the other room – through contracts, treaties, and international agreements.
If we were to look at a true representative interactive map of the borders of the United States, it would actually look like a U.S. shaped slice of Swiss cheese. Incrementally, as each Inland Port and Foreign Trade Zone is implemented, a new hole in the middle of the United States appears, where U.S. laws are non-existent.
Let’s take a land-locked state like Colorado for example. As there are no oceans (international waters) touching any of Colorado’s borders (the land), there is only one way to create an Inland Port in this state. The state must become a virtual body of water.
When an Inland Port is created, it becomes an international jurisdiction under international Maritime Law. And since Maritime/Admiralty law is the “law of the sea”, the land must become a port among a body of water in legal terms. Thus, as a port receiving trade through trade-routes, the land now becomes international jurisdiction. it’s brilliant really, when you stop and think about it. Suddenly a port pops up in the middle of of the land, with no water around it whatsoever. And yet it falls under the law of the sea!
So how is this accomplished?
Perhaps you’ve heard of the controversial NAFTA Super Highways…
You see, the rest of the United States (the land) becomes a “land-bridge” over virtual (paper) water between these ports and zones, and the roads and highways now outside of the United States called NAFTA represent international virtual waterways under international Admiralty Law going from Inland Port to Inland Port. Thus, the whole structure of ports and highways are under the law of the sea – outside of the United States. Why start a limited corporation in the great state of Colorado when you can move 10 miles away into an unlimited Foreign Trade Zone? Why hire American workers with all of their demands and minimum wages laws when you can hire foreigners living in these Foreign Zones? After all, anyone can live and work in the Zones without being a United States citizen. And with no U.S. labor laws, health insurance, or pension funding requirements for retirement, why hire American when you can hire Chinese, Indonesian, or Indian at a fraction of the cost? It’s just on the other side of the Highway you know…
In the middle of America…
So now let’s get back to government’s opinion:
“The House and Senate Reports accompanying the legislation virtually compel this conclusion, explaining as they do that “a foreign government’s . . . employment or engagement of laborers, clerical staff or marketing agents . . . would be among those included within” the definition of commercial activity. H.R.Rep. No. 94-1487, p. 16 (1976) (House Report); S. Rep. No. 94-1310, p. 16 (1976) (Senate Report)…”
“I had thought the [507 U.S. 349, 369] issue put to rest some time ago when, in a slightly different context, CHIEF JUSTICE Marshall observed:
“It is, we think, a sound principle, that when a government becomes a partner in any trading company, it divests itself, so far as concerns the transactions of that company, of its sovereign character, and takes that of a private citizen. Instead of communicating to the company its privileges and its prerogatives, it descends to a level with those with whom it associates itself, and takes the character which belongs to its associates, and to the business which is to be transacted. Thus, many States of this Union who have an interest in Banks, are not suable even in their own Courts; yet they never exempt the corporation from being sued. The State of Georgia, by giving to the Bank the capacity to sue and be sued, voluntarily strips itself of its sovereign character, so far as respects the transactions of the Bank, and waives all the privileges of that character. As a member of a corporation, a government never exercises its sovereignty. It acts merely as a corporator, and exercises no other power in the management of the affairs of the corporation, than are expressly given by the incorporating act.” –U.S. Supreme Court, Bank of the United States v. Planters’ Bank of Georgia (1824) 22 US (9 Wheat) 904, 6 L.Ed 244
See also Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, 425 U.S. 682, 695 -696 (1976) (plurality opinion).”
According to Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, under the definition for the word “corporation”, it states:
“Chief Justice Marshall describes a corporation to be “an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law. Being the mere creature of law,” continues the judge, “it possesses only those properties which the charter of its creation confers upon it, either expressly or as incidental to its very existence. These are such as are supposed best calculated to effect the object for which it was created. Among the most important are immortality, and if the expression may be allowed, individuality properties by which a perpetual succession of many persons are considered, as the same, and may act as the single individual, They enable a corporation to manage its own affairs, and to hold property without the perplexing intricacies, the hazardous and endless necessity of perpetual conveyance for the purpose of transmitting it from hand to hand. It is chiefly for the purpose of clothing bodies of men, in succession, with these qualities and capacities, that corporations were invented, and are in use.”
(Author’s Note: It is important to note here that technically the corporation of the United States or portions thereof can be “conveyed” to foreign hands, including the United Nations. Remember, this is all on paper, through treaties and agreements. And it wont likely make the nightly news as it happens piece by piece, port by port, zone by zone… This can all be done while never changing the corporate charter name of “United States” or of states, counties, cities (municipal corporations), and districts.)
And this legal definition goes on to state:
Corporation: “Nations or states, are denominated by publicists, bodies politic, and are said to have their affairs and interests, and to deliberate and resolve, in common. They thus become as moral persons, having an understanding and will peculiar to themselves, and are susceptible of obligations and laws. Vattel, 49. In this extensive sense the United States may be termed a corporation; and so may each state singly.”
And Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, defines the word corporator as:
CORPORATOR. One who is a member of a corporation. 2. In general, a corporator is entitled to enjoy all the benefits and rights which belong to any other member of the corporation as such. But in some corporations, where the rights are of a pecuniary nature, each corporator is entitles to those rights in proportion to his interest; he will therefore be entitled to vote only in proportion to the amount of his stock, and be entitled to dividends in the same proportion. 3. A corporator is not in general liable personally for any act of the corporation, unless he has been made so by the charter creating the corporation.
(Author’s Note: This means the American people can be made liable for United Nations debt or funding, and that the United States is a member- i. e. not a “sovereign” entity – with only a “vote” in world affairs, including its own.)
Note here that the United States is a “member” of the United Nations, and of the International Monetary Fund (World Bank).
Can you put the pieces together?
And of course when Bouvier’s defines the United States, it says:
UNION. By this word is understood the United States of America; as, all good citizens will support the Union.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The name of this country. The United States… 5. The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property.
Again from the Supreme Court – near the year of the founding of this “country”…
“If Congress, previous to the Articles of Confederation, possessed any authority, it was an authority, as I have shown, derived from the people of each province in the first instance. When the obnoxious acts of Parliament passed, if the people in each province had chosen to resist separately, they undoubtedly had equal right to do so as to join in general measures of resistance with the people of the other provinces, however unwise and destructive such a policy might and undoubtedly would have been. If they had pursued this separate system, and afterwards the people of each province had resolved that such province should be a free and independent state, the state from that moment would have become possessed of all the powers of sovereignty internal and external — viz., the exclusive right of providing for their own government, and regulating their intercourse with foreign nations — as completely as any one of the ancient kingdoms or republics of the world, which never yet had formed or thought of forming any sort of federal union whatever. A distinction was taken at the bar between a state and the people of the state. It is a distinction I am not capable of comprehending. By a state forming a republic (speaking of it as a moral person) I do not mean the legislature of the state, the executive of the state, or the judiciary, butall the citizens which compose that state and are, if I may so express myself, integral parts of it, all together forming a body politic. The great distinction between monarchies and republics (at least our republics) in general is that in the former, the monarch is considered as the sovereign, and each individual of his nation as subject to him, though in some countries with many important special limitations. This, I say, is generally the case, for it has not been so universally.
But in a republic, all the citizens, as such, are equal, and no citizen can rightfully exercise any authority over another but in virtue of a power constitutionally given by the whole community, and such authority, when exercised, is in effect an act of the whole community which forms such body politic. In such governments, therefore, the sovereignty resides in the great body of the people, but it resides in them not as so many distinct individuals, but in their politic capacity only. Thus A. B. C. and D., citizens of Pennsylvania and as such together with all the citizens of Pennsylvania, share in the sovereignty of the state. Suppose a state to consist exactly of the number of 100,000 citizens, and it were practicable for all of them to assemble at one time and in one place, and that 99,999 did actually assemble. The state would not be in fact assembled. Why? Because the state in fact is composed of all the citizens, not of a part only, however large that part may be, and one is wanting, in the same manner as 99 is not a hundred, because one pound is wanting to complete the full sum.
But as such exactness in human affairs cannot take place, as the world would be at an end or involved in universal massacre and confusion if entire unanimity from every society was required; as the assembling in large numbers, if practicable as to the actual meeting of all the citizens, or even a considerable part of them, could be productive of no rational result because there could be no general debate, no consultation of the whole, nor of consequence a determination grounded on reason and reflection, and a deliberate view of all the circumstances necessary to be taken into consideration, mankind has long practiced (except where special exceptions have been solemnly adopted) upon the principle that the majority shall bind the whole, and in large countries, at least, that representatives shall be chosen to act on the part of the whole. But when they do so, they decide for the whole, and not for themselves only.
Thus when the legislature of any state passes a bill by a majority, competent to bind the whole, it is an act of the whole assembly, not of the majority merely. So when this Court gives a judgment by the opinion of a majority, it is the judgment, in a legal sense, of the whole Court. So I conceive when any law is passed in any state in pursuance of constitutional authority, it is a law of the whole state acting in its legislative capacity, as are also executive and judiciary acts constitutionally authorized, acts of the whole state in its executive or judiciary capacity, and not the personal acts alone of the individuals, composing those branches of government. The same principles apply as to legislative, executive, or judicial acts of the United States, which are acts of the people of the United States in those respective capacities, as the former are of the people of a single state. These principles have long been familiar in regard to the exercise of a constitutional power as to treaties. These are deemed the treaties of the two nations, not of the persons only whose authority was actually employed in their formation. There is not one principle that I can imagine which gives such an effect as to treaties that has not such an operation on any other legitimate act of government, all powers being equally derived from the same fountain, all held equally in trust, and all, when rightfully exercised, equally binding upon those from whom the authority was derived.
I conclude, therefore, that every particle of authority which originally resided either in Congress or in any branch of the state governments was derived from the people who were permanent inhabitants of each province in the first instance and afterwards became citizens of each state; that this authority was conveyed by each body politic separately, and not by all the people in the several provinces or states jointly, and of course that no authority could be conveyed to the whole but that which previously was possessed by the several parts; that the distinction between a state and the people of a state has in this respect no foundation, each expression in substance meaning the same thing; consequently, that one ground of argument at the bar, tending to show the superior sovereignty of Congress in the instance in question, was not tenable, and therefore that upon that ground the exercise of the authority in question can not be supported.”
This important opinion tells you one very important thing… You do not now or did they then live in a true idealistic republic! If you are a citizen, you are nothing more than a part of the whole citizenry (in this case equality is a bad thing, for it takes away your rights). You are the State – a tiny piece of the jigsaw puzzle made up of equal size citizens. The people and the State are the same thing. “Distinct individuals have no power or sovereignty – only the state does as a body politic of all the people combined. This literally squashes the theory that in the United States all men are kings of themselves. This is just a falacy to be shelved with all the other “free country” myths out there. And the State creates these treaties and agreements with Foreign entities with the legal presumption that you don’t give a damn!
You aren’t fighting it, if you even know about it, and so the plans for world governance and the conveyance of the United States lands into United Nations (NWO) hands goes on unhindered.
For some clarification, here are the Bovier’s Law Dictionary definitions of a “Republic”:
REPUBLIC. A commonwealth; that form of government in which the administration of affairs is open to all the citizens. In another sense, it signifies the state, independently of its form of government. 1 Toull. n. 28, and n. 202, note. In this sense, it is used by Ben Johnson. Those that, by their deeds make it known, whose dignity they do sustain; And life, state, glory, all they gain, Count the Republic’s, not their own, Vide Body Politic; Nation; State.
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT. A government in the republican form; a government of the people; it is usually put in opposition to a monarchical or aristocratic government. 2. The fourth section of the fourth article of the constitution, directs that“the United States shall guaranty to every state in the Union a republican form of government.” The form of government is to be guarantied, which supposes a form already established, and this is the republican form of government the United States have undertaken to protect. See Story, Const. §1807.
Yet another common fallacy squashed by the constitution itself!
Some how the people of the United States have mixed up the notion that the “United States” government – the central government of Washington D.C. as a federation – is supposed to be a republic. But this is not what the constitution states at all. The only requirement of the United States Federal Government laid out in its constitution is that the United States corporation in Washington D.C. must protect the already establish form of government of each individual state. Remember, the citizen is subject to two forms of government, one the state and one Federal.
On this, the Supreme Court state its opinion:
“The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two Governments: one State, and the other National; but there need be no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses, the other does not. They are established for different purposes, and have separate jurisdictions. Together they make one whole, and furnish the people of the United States with a complete government, ample for the protection of all their rights at home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that a person is amenable to both jurisdictions for one and the same act… It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government.“ –The Supreme Court, 92 US 551: “U.S. v Cruikshank”
While you may live in a republic within your individual state, you do not live in a republic called the United States. The distinction here is absolutely key, and the tempering of fallacious considerations of the intent of the national government
And if “Common Law” is your bag, you should know that in the same case the Supreme Court stated its opinion about the Common Law:
“It is a rule at common law (the reason applies in equity and other civil law cases) that if a party can plead a fact material to his defense, and omits to do it at the proper time, he can never avail himself of it afterwards.”
Now why would anyone in their right mind agree to such a sinister and offending rule as this? And why would anyone submit to this?
Can you imagine…
You: Oh yeah judge, I forgot to mention that I have a video tape and 20 witnesses that saw me 1,000 miles away from the scene of the crime at the exact time of the crime.
Judge (as his gavel smashes down): Inadmissible! Guilty as charged!!!
It goes on to say:
“The law rather chooses that a party should incur a risk of this nature than leave a door open to endless litigation upon pretenses the truth of which it is very difficult to discover.”
God forbid we should have long litigation in order to discover the truth!
This is called the “justice system”, by the way. And the only thing common about common law is that it is commonly tyrannical just like any other legal system. Even if you had a good experience in court by a judge who seemed lawful or constitutional, this does not dismiss the fact that at any time this type of “opinion” can arise. It’s a rule that a judge may choose to follow at his whim. And while a man acting as judge may certainly consider late evidence, he certainly is not required to. Law means nothing to a corrupt politician or judge. And it is certainly a fallacy to overlook the rules just because once you had a good experience. The fallacy: This judge acted fairly and constitutionally, therefore all judges act fairly and constitutionally.
In this particular case, believe it or not, the “person” harmed was actually physically dead, but since the defendants did not claim this fact within the discovery process, this fact actually had no bearing on the case. The fact that the person was dead was not considered when doing wrong to that person. Image how that felt to the defendants when those words were uttered by the judge, who were no doubt thinking… Why in the hell would this fact even need to be mentioned???
It states:
“II. The death of Doane has been alleged for another purpose.
It is said that the decree is to restore to Elisha Doane, which was impossible because Elisha Doane was not then in being. Admitting that upon this record we are to take judicial notice that Doane was dead at the time of pronouncing the decree (in which I am by no means clear), yet if this was the real reason why the plaintiffs in error had withheld the property or its proceeds, they might themselves have said so. They have not, and as each party generally makes the best of his own case, we are to presume that did not in fact constitute their reason. In this case it could be of no avail but at the utmost to prevent the allowance of interest until a demand actually made. It never could destroy the whole beneficial effect of a decree given in rem, and when the parties who make the objection were in court and parties to the very decree complained of. I think nothing can be more evident than that if the decree be not totally void, the administrators are entitled to the benefit of it, at least until it is set aside for error, if there be any error in it, and such a remedy is now practicable. If a scire facias was necessary before execution could have been obtained out of the court which passed the decree, it could be for no other reason than that the other party might have an opportunity to contest the validity of the letters and the existence of the administration, if any such objection could be supported. Such an objection might have been made here. It has not been made. There is therefore, I conceive, no principle of law or justice which forbids giving effect to the decree upon this ground.”
You: But judge, the victim was already dead before I had anything to do with her!
Judge:Inadmissible! Guilty as charged!!!
Ok, extreme I admit. The point is that the possibility – as a rule – is that at any time a judge can dismiss crucial evidence that would prove your innocence without considering it.
But listen to what was stated even later in this case:
“A court of justice, indeed, ought at its peril to take notice of its own jurisdiction, and it is not often that cases of such doubt arise that a judge can be at a loss on the subject. But it may happen and does sometimes happen that innocent and serious doubts are really entertained. Is a court therefore, because its judgments may be finally dissented from by a superior tribunal, to be considered as flying in the face of the law, so that parties before it shall not only be protected in disobeying it but punished for their obedience? If this be the case, the old maxim cedunt arma togae (let arms yield to the toga – modern: let military power give way to civil power) will very ill apply to courts of justice. Instead of being the peaceful arbiters of right and the sacred asylum of unprotected innocence, their very forums will be the seat of war and confusion.”
Why is this all so important to the establishment of a New World Order Government?
Well let’s see… so far the Supreme court has allowed corporations to be people with rights, allowed these corporations to merge and acquire each other to establish monopolies and trusts, allowed these corporations not only to clone life but to create new genetically altered life and then patent that life-form as a novel (unique) property of the corporation and government, it has ruled that children can be vaccinated without parental consent, it has allowed the United Nations to claim a part of the City of New York as international land immune from U.S. law, and seems to not be at all concerned with the thousands of Presidential Directives and Executive Orders that have allowed everything from martial law in America to unmanned drones for the use of killing Americans abroad and spying on them nationally.
Now why in God’s name would I put my trust in this body of “Justices” to do the right thing in protecting me or my country or to combat the implementation of world governance? They are, after all, appointed by the same president and congress that is allowing it to happen in the first place! They aren’t even voted in by the people who suffer their opinions!!!
So what does it mean to you to” fight for your country”?
Well, you better start comprehending that your country and your state is in the control of a rogue government, and that to save the land the government must not be allowed to expand globally by expanding its ream of paper to include all of the United Nations as it’s master.
The “United States” is in the process of becoming nothing more than an admiralty law-based “land-bridge” between oceans and countries, a port of call for the world government and its corporations built with your taxpayer money.
And all of this proving the pen is mightier than the sword, simply because the people will not wield the sword as their fore-fathers supposedly did.
In our interview, we discussed that in order to create a new World Government, the current borders of the United States must be destroyed. It is, however, important to state that the individual state governments and borders need not be demolished simply because the Federal government and borders are abolished. It is in fact the contractual nature of the individual states to this central government which is the cause of the loss of individual state sovereignty. As individual republics, under a new United States “union” the country would be no less grand.
Is it only me that feels this way?
…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
–Constitution of the united states of America
“Whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.”
–New Hampshire Constitution, Article 10 of the Bill of Rights
“All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety, happiness and the protection of property. For the advancement of these ends, they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may deem proper.”
–Kentucky Constitution, Kentucky Bill of Rights
“All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety and happiness. For the advancement of these ends they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think proper.”
–Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1, Section 2 of the Declaration of Rights
“3d. That Government ought to be instituted for the common benefit, protection and security of the people; and that the doctrine of non-resistance against arbitrary power and oppression is absurd, slavish, and destructive to the good and happiness of mankind.”
–North Carolina Constitution, November 21, 1789
“All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.”
–Texas Constitution, Article 1, Section 2
“Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by rule of law.”
–Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, United Nations (paying lip service to this decree with despicable arrogance and confidence as it subsumes all other constitutions!)
So what part of this aren’t you comprehending?
And just what do you think the 2nd amendment is for?
Better listen to the show now folks, and start to grasp exactly what’s happening in a local, county, district, state, and national government near you. For right this very second, government is doing all of the above for you, on paper, handing over the “country” to a global corporate federation, making the above options of abolition obsolete and unlawful with each treaty and contract your representatives sign, conveying the land to foreign interests…
And remember, just because you don’t see it doesn’t change the fact that it”s happening…
This is what you are truly fighting:
And the future of food (just replace metal powder with protein powder):
Truth is so much stranger than fiction, and so much closer to science fiction than imaginable.
In closing, I can only say that no matter what your “country” means to you; no matter how you define it – I think now would be a good time to start fighting for it while it’s still recognizable as such, and while we still have a resemblance to natural humans.
.
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, February 11th, 2013
The original Coat of Arms of the Fabian Society, a wolf in sheeps’ clothing
This statue of Washington donning a Masonic Apron
The God Trust
Masonic protection from Masonic police…
At the Philadelphia Masonic Hall…
Defending Freedom… or forcing and enforcing it?
Harry S. Truman
Paul Revere, Mason and Founding Father.
What the American Flag might have been…
“Sponsered by the George Washington Masonic Stamp Club.”
It’s a Phoenix, not an Eagle!
Dr. John Theophilus Desaguliers
Solomon’s Seal
Solomon’s Seal at Lion’s Gate, Old Jerusalem wall
Freemasons = The Sons Of Light
Reportedly hanging out on the dollar bill,
A press club in government (Washington D.C.)? An owl (Molech),
Depiction of the Menorah on the Arch of Titus in Rome,
A father sacrificing his own son…
(“Der Götze Moloch” i.e. The Idol Moloch).
Baphomet – male and female,
Other male/female dualities in gods,
The Goyim can be made to covet anything.
Nationalism is the propagandist key to maintain govern-ment.
Why is it in the shape of a phallus (obelisk)?
Recognize the inverted 5-pointed star (pentagram)?
Ancient of Days by William Blake, 1794
Seventh-Day Adventist Headquarters in Singapore
Parthenon in Athens
United State Supreme Court Building
Statues of Confucius, Moses, and Solon adorn one of
In modern times, where up is down and left is right, the Lieber Code
REALITY BLOG 
Everything is backwards
/ April 21, 2018 / Edit
What a fantastic article! Scary as hell. I have know about the retirement scheme for some time (CalPers). Anyone who doesn’t take this seriously and protect themselves are fools. Thank you for your research and time. I will post of FB, and send email in Sacramento.
Wonder Ann
/ April 21, 2018 / Edit
thank you for this document which shows more of the fraud and theft against the government employees of CA. There is a video on youtube about the actual way that the CalPERS is rigged to hid the excess money from the pensioners. It is about 3-4 hours of detailed evidence of the fraud.
Maxx
/ April 23, 2018 / Edit
After much reflection on over 25 years of “trying to wake people up” Ive decided that %90 of Americans, of all races are “autistic” (too medically/neurologically damaged) and will never understand the predicament they are in. In other words we are talking to brick walls.
Everything is backwards
/ April 23, 2018 / Edit
Thank you for your comment. You are absolutely correct. I’m seeing it, but didn’t know quite how to say it.
tonyj1947@gmail.com
/ April 24, 2018 / Edit
What I mentioned a little while ago. Have a look when you’ve some time to use up
From me
Randy
/ May 8, 2018 / Edit
http://gasb.org/cs/ContentServer?c=Page&cid=1176156669308&d=&pagename=GASB%2FPage%2FGASBSectionPage
Hey Clint I was just reading some of this and one thing for sure the proof of the coverup or hiding of the our money is all laid out for us. we just got to figure out how to get the zombified people of this country to do anything! you’ve probably already seen this stuff, but please keep up the good work. and man I know you got to be burnt out on this stuff, it is exhausting Ive been into this “truth” crap for about 25 years now and it can kinda make’s you numb. thank you.
Randy
/ May 8, 2018 / Edit
sorry i forgot to title that comment , history of the accounting standards to help cover up and hide the theft of our money in cafr’s