Why I Quit Hollywood


I realize now that I was guilty of exactly what I blame people for today.

Cognitive Dissonance…

It was a constant mental battle with my ego; an effort to compensate for those scraps of carnal knowledge, like many uncomfortable splinters incrementally digging deeper into my skin, that told me what I was working on and therefore condoning as “just a job” was morally and ethically wrong. 

 You see, I was a professional Hollywood sound designer – the guy who made war scenes and civil war reenactments sound so incredibly real. I was the guy who used “foley” recordings of squeezed fruit and veggies to produce realistic blood and guts for total aural stimulation in the entertainment experience. I was the guy who made monsters and dragons come to life, designing the roars and squeals that hopefully made the audience recoil with excitement; accepting for just that brief interactive experience the death and dismemberment, murder and rape, torture and sadism that goes into the making of many of Hollywood’s movies and games; Jewish torture porn as I now know it to be called. I knew, for instance, that some of the best screams and squeals of shear terror, pain, and agony emanating out from my massive sound library at Soundelux studios was that of the castration of pigs in slaughter yards. And yet the sincerity of these sounds are what made such evil creatures, created through some sick, twisted, and perverted artist somewhere, come to life and make my audiences skin crawl.

And I quite enjoyed my work. For I was an artist myself, unaware of my own dissonance and denial that what I was doing may very well be harming others and myself. 

I had listened to the arguments. I had even considered them briefly; like a starving man considers a day old uneaten hamburger, weighing the dangers and consequences of the very sustenance that would end the pangs of his hunger. But with me it was my ego that was hungry. I strived to be the best at what I did, and received acknowledgements and awards for my work and work ethic. I considered the horror that I was promoting and creating, and my ego only wanted more – more notoriety, more respect, more money, and more credits for my now worthless resume’. 

A demon’s hiss? No problem.

The Devil’s vocals? Ok. I can do it.

Zombies, gremlins, dragons, goblins, and just pure evil? Great. Bring it on!!!

One day, as I had increasingly been listening to internet radio and talk shows in my windowless and soundproof studio, I heard an interview with a United States soldier. This young man, barely out of high school, was in charge of flying the drones that were dropping bombs in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and wherever else the United States government asked him to. For him, this was just a job – dropping bombs on men, women, and children. He referred to the flight controls as being very similar to a video game booth. And for some reason, this boy struck a nerve with me. 

As he explained the details of each mission, sitting comfortably in an underground bunker with joystick in hand and an approximately three-second delay between the drone camera and his digital reconstruction of that feed thousands of miles away in the deserts of New Mexico, he proceeded to explain that the kill ratio was not very accurate. He explained that for every suspected “terrorist” that he would attempt to kill by dropping bombs from a pilotless drone across the world, the collateral damage was expected and accepted to be around 95% in civilian casualties.

In other words, 95 innocent men, women, and children would needlessly die for every actual target that was hit by these drone attacks.

Perhaps this would have been enough to set things into motion for me; to squash my ego and realize what later became so loud and clear… but there was more to this story.

As this boy soldier, a corporal, went on with his daily routine, he commented that his wife and children also lived on the military base with him. And like any 9-5 job in any corporation in America, this boy went home to his family each night as if all was right in the world; as if what he was doing was perfectly normal.

But it was his final clutches into my ego that were the most haunting…

As a young kid, he continued in that interview, this deliverer of unmanned death and destruction was a video game fanatic. Thus, comparing this weapons and flight simulator to an arcade video game booth was just a forgone conclusion in his head. This was literally just like his favorite games. This really was “Modern Warfare”.

For whatever reason, it was this one event in my short-lived career as a Hollywood sound editor that shattered my ego into many pieces. It made all of those Christian fundamentalist’s and concerned parent’s incessant ranting about violence in video games and movies become a reality. It was right in front of my face; for the first time spoken to me by an eye-witness of his own self-subversion and social media conditioning. Perhaps it was the singularly disturbing lack of empathy in his voice as he referred to flesh and blood people, including children, as targets, assets, and collateral. Or perhaps it was his lack of conscious in the contradiction of his own disposition – coming home to his wife and children after a day of killing real wives and children for a living, without the irony or absolute mental illness of that situation being readily apparent through his confident and militarily trained responses.

This was a turning point in my life – one of those defining moments that either makes or breaks a man; instilling an undoubting and permanent morality that can not be shaken or washed away by the tides of time. It was the destruction of a large chunk of my own cognitive dissonance.

Over the next year or so, I went room to room and asked my fellow and more experienced co-workers if the years of design of demonic images and bloody sound effects had yet created a sense of dread in them. The answers were sporadic, mostly depending upon their age. However, overwhelmingly those answers were of the opinion that with the advent of newer and better technologies to create more terrifying and graphically superior and disgusting monsters, the more the constant visualization of these images were effecting the well-being of these designers. Some wished to quit but had families and so couldn’t. Some prayed every night in the hopes that this would somehow make their involvement in this gross promotion of gore and violence more acceptable to God, for which I was equally disturbed. And yet the youngest of these people; those who had grown up in the modern advanced video game generation, seemed to assess my questions as ridiculous – as if I was one of those crazy fundamentalists or parent groups out there trying to take away their fun. This delicious irony only further solidified my distaste for what I was doing as a job. I was literally helping to disassociate whole generations of children and adults from reality – creating dissonance in promotion of ego, destroying empathy, and causing what would otherwise be shunned as perverse and morally wrong to be accepted as perfectly normal and in fact wonderful.

I was the media. I was the bad guy. And yet, until the end, I could not see this job as anything but cool… with my name 2×10 feet in brightly lit movie credits. 

And sadly, when I left, my naturally Jewish boss made no illusions. There were 1,000’s of people out there that wanted my job. And I gave him no delusions that I wanted to come back some day. For I made the conscious decision to quit Hollywood and to move far away. As he was interviewing a young and impressionable kid to take my place, he insincerely wished me luck.

As I finished up with my work on the ultimate zombie-gore-fest entitled “Resident Evil 5”, I vowed to never participate in this type of media again. I quit Hollywood!!!

–=–

I have told this story many times on various radio interviews, attempting to instill in people not only the crisis of conscious that I myself went through, but also the fact that there is life outside of the established guidelines of what is considered “normal”. My job was normal. And yet, normal is a sickening participation in debauchery.

This brings to mind one of my favorite quotes:

“It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.”

–Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe–

I believe that no truer words have ever been spoken, than those of this quote. In one complexly simple sentence, this quote defines exactly the truth of this life and this consciousness. And yet everything out there, including my former profession, is designed to disassociate people from that consciousness; to numb the mind and excite the body, and to absolutely adjust whole generations to a profoundly sick society.

Take it from someone who’s been there…

Finally, as you likely did not get the opportunity to hear what I did, I was recently sent this video that has the same type of situation. Here, a group of soldiers shows you the video game booths and their controls for which they use to fly these unmanned drones and kill families in distant foreign lands.

“The U.S. Air Force is in the midst of radical change, now training more drone pilots than fighter pilots.”

This, you see, with the help of the video game, movie, and other digital entertainment media, is now becoming normal. And before you know it, these soldiers will be flying over your home. And somebody in camouflage fatigues will be making the decision for that drone pilot as to wether or not your family is acceptable collateral damage or not while texting his wife to cook a steak that night. Expect to see predictive programming reality television shows about these domestic drones and how normal they are, and more “toys” that can be flown through your so-called “smart-phones” – you know, the surveillance device carried around by most not-so-smart people who have been conditioned to believe that these smart-grid technologies placed into their phones and pads are for fun, entertainment, and for making a simple phone call.

At around 6:30 in this video, we see these military drone pilots acting normally:

“So, I have the opportunity to go to work, fly a mission, ah- no matter where it is, do the job, and then I put on a different hat and I come home to my wife and kids.”

–Unknown soldier in video, coming to a town near you,
“no matter where it is”.

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, January 5th, 2013

Understanding The 2012 Electoral College


So you think you, the People, elected the president of the United States?

–=–

“In reality, when the voters of North Carolina voted this past November, they were actually voting to pick this slate of electors instead of voting directly for the president and the vice-president.”

–Elaine Marshall, Secretary of State of North Carolina,
speaking at the 2012 Electoral College ceremony

–=–

After all of the pomp and circumstance of the 2012 “popular” vote of the “people” of the United States; including the wasted billions upon billions in campaign coverage, donations, PAC’s, Super-PAC’s, advertising, public relations, buttons and brochures, the media coverage of baby kissing, and everything else that went into the carefully planned charade of the fallacious popular election of the president and vice-president of the United States, the president was finally “formally” and indirectly elected by the Electors of the Electoral College on December 17th, 2012.

That’s right, folks. I’m here again to tell you that you “the People” do not elect your president.

This time, however, I’ve got a little help from my good friend the Secretary of State of North Carolina. In the following video coverage, she actually tells the truth: that the majority of United States citizens (people) do not know that the Electors, not the people (voters), elect the president.

It is not as if this is a secret, though it could be called a very open secret per the void of comprehension existing within the country. It’s just that the procedural and true indirect election process is not talked about openly at any other time of the election process. Instead, the popular vote and all that is involved with it takes over the limelight and the media specifically promotes the fallacy that the people have a direct effect on the actual election of the president. This is not the truth, yet it is what most American voters believe. And every four years the question arises amongst the masses – Who are you going to vote for as president of the United States?

Some of those people, whom without reading their constitution or knowing that this 4-year election process is indeed an indirect election without consideration of their individual vote, actually wait over 7 or more hours in line just to cast their popular vote, as is the case in the State of Florida. They truly believe that this sacrifice will actually make a difference in the outcome of the presidential election. And to me, this is such a sad spectacle.

Despite the billions of dollars pumped into the popular election process that is then broadcast on every major news station in the world, we find that comparatively, the electoral college is lucky if it even gets mentioned at all on the main television stations, and is generally barely even broadcast on C-SPAN over a month after the popular election takes place – just enough time for the people to get over their win or loss and stop giving a rat’s ass until the next rigged election.

So un-hyped is the actual election of the president and vice-president each year, that this year apparently C-SPAN felt that the importance of the actual real constitutional election of the president of the United States was just about important enough to be broadcast to the public on C-SPAN’s Channel #3 – not even the main C-SPAN channel.

Here is the C-SPAN website where just two of the actual electoral college elections (happening simultaneously in all 50 States) was broadcast and is available for re-viewing. It states:

WASHINGTON, DC 
Monday, December 17, 2012

The 538 members of the Electoral College met on Monday in their respective states where they cast their votes for President and Vice President. 270 electoral votes are required to elect the President. C-SPAN coverage included two of these meetings, Ohio and North Carolina.

Last month, President Obama won the popular vote in Ohio, which has 18 electoral votes. Governor Romney won the battleground state of North Carolina, which has 15 electoral votes.

VIDEO LINK –> http://www.c-span.org/Campaign2012/Events/North-Carolina-Electoral-College-Vote/10737436611-3/

Thankfully we can watch this event on Youtube here for easier reference, thanks to “Voterradio.com”:

Please note that as of December 24th, this video has a total of 31 views. This indeed shows the popularity of the Electoral College and how much it is comprehended by the voting public, especially when comparing the multi-100’s-of-millions of views for a single Lady GaGa video, or if your style is Gundam…

I suggest that, after reading this entire rant, each of you who may be reading this go through this entire video so that you can actually understand how the presidential election works – and comprehend the fact that you do not vote for president in any form of direct election, and that the president is indeed elected by the 538 member Electoral College – and that in reality the office is elected via proxy by the two privately incorporated political parties who submit these electors to the government. In short, the election of the president and vice-president (a separate election process) is conducted by the Republican and Democratic parties, not by the people of the United States.

For your reference, and for those that just don’t seem to have time in their busy days to learn that their country operates as a constitutional fascist oligarchy by indirect election of its C.E.O. under private associations called political parties right under their noses – even as you Rock The Vote every four years – here are a few direct quotes from the CSPAN coverage spoken by the Secretary of State of the great State of North Carolina. Pay close attention, as these quotes tell the story of the whole election process…

–=–

As quoted from the Secretary of the State of North Carolina at the Electoral College ceremony (video above), December 17th, 2012:

“North Carolina did not participate in the very first presidential election because North Carolina did not ratify the constitution until after passage of the Bill of Rights. And only then did North Carolina officially join the Union, approximately 10 months after the election of George Washington.”

“Today, we are gathered, essentially, to certify the will of the people of North Carolina who voted in the presidential election in November of this year.”

“I will note once again that the voters of our state turned out in big numbers… I hope many of those voters have tuned in today to see their– that process reach its completion.”

“As North Carolina becomes more global we are mindful that our impact in the world is significant, as evidenced by the fact that we have so many foreign consuls now in North Carolina. Three of them are here with us today… France…Sweeden… Moldova… we welcome all three of you to this 56th meeting of the North Carolina Electoral College.”

“Now, as we prepare to begin the voting process for the North Carolina Electoral College, I would just like to take a moment to reflect on the importance of this institution. This is the 56th North Carolina Electoral College meeting and it represents a proud history of citizens (electors) peacefully passing on presidential power from one term in office to the next. Today’s activities are a combination of constitutional law, Federal law, and State law.”

“In the end, this (electoral college) system was designed for several reasons (unintelligible) rights. Those reasons included: that the meetings be held throughout the 50 states versus one convention to keep the sites separate; that electors cannot also be powerful public officials; and that every state gets a formally set number of votes in order to give it a vote in the process. That is why today people all across the United States are gathering at State capitals to conclude the 2012 presidential campaign – in a formal sense – and to move us toward the 2013 presidential inauguration in Washington D.C.”

“I am often asked: How does a citizen ever become an elector? Well the process is fairly simple. You must be a citizen who is over 21 years of age and eligible to vote. You also cannot be a Federal office holder, or certain kinds of other public official. Then you offer your name to your political party for consideration. Generally the political parties pick their slate of elector nominees pursuant to party rules at their annual political convention in each election year. Those names are submitted by the respective parties to the office of Secretary of State sometime in the summer, and they are held until the election of November. (Hesitantly) Once– We wait and see, which– candidate has been certified (by the political parties) to us we then call those electors. The elector nominees from the different political parties just simply wait to see who the voters vote for as president and vice-president – which means in reality, when the voters of North Carolina voted this past November, they were actually voting to pick this slate of electors instead of voting directly for the president and the vice-president.”

“As we move to the former meeting of Electors, I would like to introduce our electors to this gathering. The 15 Republican electors were called to Raleigh and have assembled here to cast North Carolina’s 15 electoral votes for president and vice-president. I am honored to introduce these distinguished– people…

–=–

Now, before you watch this absolutely rehearsed, staged, and predetermined stage play of a ceremony for the election of Mitt Romney as president of the United States and Paul Ryan as vice-president of the United States, I would very much like for you to read what one of these Electors had to say about this circus side-show called the Electoral College and his participation in it. And trust me when I say, this honest and candid statement by the man elected by the 15-member North Carolina Electoral College to be president of that college in the election ceremony is perhaps the most important truth about this fraud that is the presidential election process that you are ever likely to read by one of its inside players.

Sit back and hold on to your lunch…

Local Resident Elected President of N.C. Electoral College

By John Nagy
As of Monday, December 17, 2012

Robert Levy, a local attorney and chairman of the Moore County Republican Party, has been elected president of North Carolina’s Electoral College.

Levy also is a political columnist for The Pilot. His column appears every Sunday.

The college on Monday will be responsible for electing the next president of the United States, but the result is not in doubt. President Barack Obama secured 332 electoral votes in November’s presidential election. The popular vote, though commonly thought to be the way the United States chooses its president, is actually a precursor. The Constitution requires the president be chosen by electors apportioned to each state.

Electors are not bound by the Constitution to cast their ballots according to their state’s popular vote, but the states themselves stipulate the way electors will vote. In all but two states, it’s winner-take-all. North Carolina has 15 electors, and its members are required to mirror the state’s popular vote for president. As such, the electors will vote for Romney on Monday.

In a Dec. 9 column on his experience as an elector, Levy wrote “It reminds me of “Gone With the Wind.” No matter how many times I see it, Scarlett still loses Rhett, and the South still loses the war.

You see, I am one of the 538 electors who will go enact a secular passion play called the Electoral College. I know how the play ends. Obama will win. Romney will lose. Why should I go? It seems silly.

“Although the Constitution might suggest differently, North Carolina law is clear. If I do not go to Raleigh this month, I will be fined. If I do not vote for the Republican nominee, my vote will not be counted, and I will be replaced by someone who will vote as commanded. All the while, everyone knows that in other state capitals, the vote for Obama will make what I do meaningless.

“Yet I am going to vote for Mitt Romney. I am taking my daughter with me to watch me vote. No matter what I do, the candidacy of Mitt Romney will die as it died in November.

Like Billy Pilgrim in the Kurt Vonnegut novel “Slaughterhouse-Five,” I will realize that I have seen my death. I have visited it many times. It always turns out the same. But I go there anyway in order to make a statement about the principles for which I stand.

(Source: http://www.thepilot.com/news/2012/dec/17/local-resident-elected-president-nc-electoral-coll/)

–=–

Perhaps it is this final irrational and illogical patriotic statement that best describes the disposition of America and Americans today…

This man, even after his brutal honesty about the sham that is the Electoral College, still believes in the validity and rightousness of the very country, government, and constitution that created this blundering inferno of wretchedness called the presidential election. Perhaps this is because he is a BAR attorney, with an oath as an officer of this government and its courts. He states here that his vote will literally not be counted, that his appearance there is only for show as a character in a predetermined “play”, and that in truth he has no legal choice in who he actually votes for by the laws of the State. He even states that he will be fined if he votes for anyone aside from who he is scripted to vote for in this “secular passion play”, and then states that if he does vote for another candidate, his vote will not be officially counted and he will be replaced by someone else from within his political party who will vote according to the scripted Republican or Democratic plan as required by State law.

And so like the American people at large, this man literally enters into an oath to protect the very fraudulent system he lends credibility to, voting for a candidate even though he knows his vote doesn’t count. And the People do the same thing, voting without conscious for political parties, lending the collective “People’s” credibility and legitimacy to a completely corrupt and purposefully misunderstood Electoral College system, all because the television and their indoctrinated peers tell them it is unpatriotic not to vote. This attorney and president of the Electoral College literally and publicly pretends to believe in a system he knows is an absolute fraud against the people because he is vested in that system as its officer, and to keep the cohesion and continuity of that very fraudulent system going as its legal cog and as its beneficiary both monetarily and in the status it provides.

This, my fellow Americans, is beyond fallacy; beyond self-destructive; beyond irrational and illogical… it’s just downright stupid!!!

How can someone such as myself cause a mass of indoctrinated people to stop supporting the very system that extorts from them their wealth, liberty, happiness, prosperity, and even their knowledge of how that system even works in the first place, and to stop voting for and legitimizing these self-inflicted wounds with their consenting votes when such petulant patriotism surrounds this once-every-four-year-event? How indeed…

At this point, as I watch this charade of entangled absurdity and corruption unfold on C-SPAN channel #3, I can’t help but laugh hysterically at the wealth of stupidity involved that would create such a void in the general comprehension of the way this voting system works for the president and vice-president of the United States. My crazy “Huckleberry” style laughing borders on that of a mad-man cherishing the chaos he has created – only this scenario was created and perpetrated by the most treacherous and ultimately deceiving madmen of all: the government. And I am its hopeless victim – doomed to see this enslavement to deception with open eyes but forced to live in its clutches, watching as men with no honor among them continue this false paradigm of legal logistics merely for some false sense of honor to retain their societal and professional status. Honor, that is, among thieves…

For the true nature of this most bizarre ceremony you are witnessing here, and eternally for every four years in the future, is strictly as this disgusting attorney, head of the Republican Party, and president of the N.C. Electoral College says it is – to go through the legal motions of an act in three parts: 1st the popular vote to elect the electors, 2nd the electoral vote to elect the president, and 3rd the inauguration that really never had anything to do with anything related to either of these scripted and rigged votes. You see, this whole game of thrones is nothing more than a pretentious procession of legal chess moves by the powers that be to gain the consent of the people by deceit – through trickery and illusion of the legal language and process. The people must above all else believe in this system, though it be so blatantly transparent, in order for the people to believe in the authority of that system and its cogs. Without this perception of power, jurisdiction, presidential privilege, congressional choice, and justice for all, these men would fall back into the sewers from whence they crawled through to rise to this perceived power through falsely wrangled and manufactured collective consent. It is this illusion of legitimacy that creates and continues the illusion of authority that so enslaves us all.

And all of this because we participate in a fake election, unknowingly granting all of our powers of consent to one of two political parties, which ultimately were set up to do exactly what we have uncovered here – to carry on the perpetual, illegitimate theft of elections via the relentless popularity and commercialism of the celebrity vote for president.

What we have here, my fellow American Idiots, is literally the perfect crime. It is organized crime, and it is legal crime. It is as politically correct as it is morally and ethically defunct. It is the power of the people, stripped, raped, and transformed into the power of the legal consent of the people – to be represented without having a choice of who that representative really is.

The true power of the people has literally been extracted and funnelled into the hands of the two major political parties, who in turn vote for party loyal electors, whom then elect the president of this illegitimate corporate structure colloquially called the United States government.

–=–

Explaining this process is nightmarish, as it does not make sense to most people. That’s because most people believe in the system, and cannot believe that it is a false belief. Unfortunately, this is the religion of the statist.

To attempt an easy explanation is an impossibility, but I will try to attempt it here:

The people, according to the constitution, are called voters. They do not vote for president. Instead, they have been fooled into casting their votes in political party elections called primary elections. This primary election narrows the many specific party candidates that are running as party representatives down to one person as the official party candidate. Thus, the first vote is nothing more than a popularity contest within these two parties, and has nothing to do with actually electing a president of the United States. For instance, an independent candidate with no party affiliation would not have a primary election, and only run in the actual election called the general election. In the general election, the voters (people) vote for which ever candidate they like. But in actuality, they are only voting for the party that they like. If the vote for the independent candidate, in many States, they must also vote for the elector of that candidate. So the people, without quite understanding this process, actually vote for the electors of the president. There are 538 electors, one for each congressman in Washington D.C. The office of president, as well, is an office in Washington D.C. You see, the president of the United States is not the president of the people, for the people do not elect him. The president is the president of the government, not the people, which is why the people do not elect him. They instead elect representatives, 538 of them, who then delegate according to the constitution one vote for each office to the political party chosen electors. The vice-president is as well the president of the Senate, and has the controlling or “tie-breaking” vote in that office. He literally presides over the senate. Thus, the vice-president is a very important office as well, and not just a wanna be president who could be president if the president dies. The voters (the people) do not actually even vote for who the electors will be, for this is done within the political party itself despite the people. Once the general election is complete, refered to as the popular vote, this event creates a certain legitimate public consent to the Electoral College members to then cast their votes for president as the official electors of that office. In truth though, the Electoral College is just a formality – a necessary legal step in the constitutional process to create the legal transference of office to either the same or different persons as president and vice-president. In other words, the Electoral College is all but ceremonial in its power, since the vast majority of its members must vote according to what State laws dictate, making their vote not an actual free vote, but a legal action predetermined by the government. In the end, the true elector of the president and vice-president of the United States is actually the political parties themselves, which are private associations with limited governance and limited relationships with the people or “citizens”. In the end, the whole election process is literally a scheme to legally and with manufactured consent take the power from the people and shift it into the political party system. Thus, the people do not vote for president, they vote for which political party they wish to rob them of their right to vote, generally without knowing this scheme is even happening. And that is the easiest I way I can explain how the word democracy in America is nothing but a cruel hoax played every four years on the people of this country.

–=–

In conclusion, I’d just like to point out a few incongruities in this Electoral College speech for those who might have missed them.

1) It is unclear to me why the Secretary of State of North Carolina stated in her opening speech that “North Carolina did not participate in the very first presidential election because North Carolina did not ratify the constitution until after passage of the Bill of Rights. And only then did North Carolina officially join the Union, approximately 10 months after the election of George Washington.” But I would note that if this little tidbit of North Carolina history is true, then the very constitutional legitimacy of the presidency of one George Washington as the first president of the United States of America must come into question. For as one of the original thirteen colonies, how could the president have been properly elected to rule the “nation” of States without this State’s electoral and popular vote? In this first presidential election, only slightly over 1% of the population voted, and the idea of even having a popular vote was ridiculous, especially by black men and women. 6 of the States had limited popular votes, but these were mere formalities to allow for upper classes to choose their electors that would in turn elect the president. Washington ran uncontested, receiving 100% of the electoral vote (minus North Carolina).

2) In her speech, the Secretary of State pointed to foreign consuls attending the ceremony as she refered to the global status of the State of North Carolina. Of this, I wonder, do I even need to make a comment? I’ll simply ask the question: Why?

3) Also in her speech, the Secretary of State for North Carolina stated that the Electoral College was organized and ratified in order to prevent the possibility “that electors cannot also be powerful public officials”. When this iteration escaped her mouth, I chuckled out of both ends in amazement and surprise, slightly splattering my mouth full of freshly sipped coffee onto my computer screen.

To nip this fallacy in the butt, let’s just take a cursory look at just one of the group of Electors from one State:

North Dakota had three (3) electors in 2012:

The current Governor, the current Lieutenant Governor, and the current State District Attorney.

(Source –> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_electors,_2012)

Are we to believe that these are not “powerful public officials”?

4) Notice that after this speech is over, the Electoral College members are introduced and sworn to take an oath before the ceremony can actually begin. You should listen to the words of this spoken promise. Perhaps the most interesting thing about this oath is that these 15 political-party-elected members of the Electoral College must swear to uphold the entire structure of government and the constitution that supports this entire scam in the first place. So this is not so much an oath to the good people of America as it is a legal compact that ensures that these 15 Electoral College members will obey under penalty of perjury and fine the laws that govern the whole corrupt election and Electoral College process in the first place. In other words, by taking an oath to uphold the constitution and Federal and State laws, these 15 electors just gave away any freedom of choice that they might have had to actually choose anything other than the Republican candidate for president – for the laws they just swore to obey state clearly that they can only vote for one candidate and not the other. Another way to examine this phenomenon is to imagine taking an oath before a court case that states that you will lie about any testimony you give in that case before the court, and that if you tell the truth you agree to be fined and punished for telling the truth – which would be breaking the law you swore to uphold in your oath. Think about it…

5) Finally, it is important to note that the Electoral College in each State is either Democrat or Republican, and never a mixed group from both parties or other independent candidates. Logic would dictate that in a fair and balanced election, this Electoral College membership would be split according to the actual popular vote statistics. So it would be reasonable to conclude that if the popular vote were cast at 30% of people voting for the Democrat Party candidate, 60% of the popular vote for the Republican Party candidate, and 10% of the popular vote for say the Libertarian (3rd party) candidate, we should see a North Carolina Electoral College that has 15 electors with 9 Republican electors, 4-5 Democrat electors, and 1-2 Libertarian or 3rd party electors. But this is not how the College works. Instead, the popular vote determines the total domination of the Electoral College regarding its popularly voted political party. So all 15 electors in the State of North Carolina are Republican Party members. This means that in each State, the entire election is decided by electors that MUST BE PARTY MEMBERS. And this means that ultimately, the election process is completely done within the political party system, without the involvement of the people in any way. If in the unlikely event that a 3rd party or independent candidate were actually to win the popular election process, then the electors of that State by law would also all be chosen by that political party, no different from other two main parties, which would not change anything at all about this corrupt system. The whole Electoral College of each State will be members of whatever single party won the popular vote. Alternatively, if the independent candidate won, the men and women for whom the people voted for as electors when they voted for that independent candidate would by law be required to vote for that candidate, and not for those in the other parties.

So if Obama, for instance, commited unethical or publicly unacceptable acts between the time of the popular vote and the electoral vote, the electoral college would still be required to vote according to thier party.

If you get nothing else out of this presentation, please get this:

Political parties are the problem with this country! They steal by manufactured consent any semblance of a true lawful election and kill any competition by not allowing other regular people to run for president. State laws prevent any true competition. And the people and the State governments are beholden to these party’s choices of electors.

The moral of this true story is a simple one.

BOYCOTT POLITICAL PARTIES!!!

Insist that candidates run as men, not as party members who represent the party, not the people. And don’t vote for them if they run under a party – any party. Boycott groups and businesses that promote this con. And teach your children well…

Act as individual free men, not as group mentality idiots. Vote as men, not parties, or don’t vote at all. End your membership in parties, and demand that the Electoral College system be reformed or abolished.

And the next time you get on someone’s case for not voting in an election, perhaps you should think twice about it. After all, it is you, the voter, that is responsible for your own ignorance of where the power of your own vote is granted. And it is you who lend legitimacy to this corrupt system with every vote you cast to the two-party political system.

Cheers and happy holidays…

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, December 24th, 2012

Lethal Injection To Be Shown In New York City


I will be abandoning the creature comforts of my warm insulated basement, phone line, and digital Skype connection to do the unthinkable – public speaking. No confrontations with corrupt politicians, no guerrilla journalism… just me and my irrational fear of public scrutiny and failure.

But the message is too important for fear’s familiar and reassuring repression…

I’ll be in New York City this Sunday to speak and then screen my “Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination” movie, starting at 4pm. If you live in or have friends in or near NYC, or can post this on local NY/NJ activist sites like We Are Change, please do so.

This is a free event. RSVP is requested to the bellow host, but not required.

The website/info for the event is here: http://www.facebook.com/events/455618077807048/

The location in Tribeca is:

Epifaneo Collective
56 walker st, New York, New York

The success of this event will reflect the success of future events by this venue, which has generously offered this space for this activism.

New York and all people in this country are in need of vaccine awareness and exemption/withdrawal of consent now more than ever, as the Federal Government now believes that its powers overrule the decision of States and district courts – which means it can, will, and has already vaccinated you and your children without your permission. Consent is implied, because nobody knows how to legally withdraw consent.

“…as it stands, this decision states that the Federal Government can trump any State Law during what it considers a “public health emergency” and then inoculate or give pharmaceuticals to children as young as kindergarten age, with no consent from the parents, all in the name of ‘public health safety’.”

LINK ->http://healthimpactnews.com/2012/new-york-appeals-court-federal-government-can-vaccinate-your-children-without-your-consent-trumps-state-laws/

LINK ->http://www.activistpost.com/2012/12/court-rules-feds-can-vaccinate-kids.html

Thanks for your help in promoting this event.

I’m certainly no celebrity, so come hang out!

Pass it on!!!

And if you’re one of the approximately 7.058 billion people out there who haven’t yet seen Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination, don’t worry, it’s free and always will be!

And you can purchase a not-for-profit copy, here: http://onedollardvdproject.com/

Note: No proceeds from the sale of this DVD goes to me, and this site has my permission to copy and offer it non-profit.

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, December 13, 2012

Corporate Deception: The Seller’s Tax


When we consider the revenue generation scheme called taxation, we have been generally manipulated into believing that these 100’s of taxes on our daily lives and the way we live them are necessary for the greater good, and that government in its altruistic disposition would never raise those taxes if it didn’t need that revenue to corporately function for the benefit of the “people”.

What a joke!

Government has allowed the addiction of the nation to nicotine, alcohol, MSG, and corn syrup, with its own blessed regulations.

Then, once the addiction sets in, in come the taxes. Let’s face it… the cigarette and alcohol tax is a tax on the purchasing of addictive drugs. Meanwhile, hemp/cannabis is still federally banned, even for its medicinal and manufacturing uses. While in several of the States, pot is now being sold and taxed legally.

The moral of the story: somehow, marijuana is only dangerous if government cannot regulate and tax it? And so government gives permission to the people to consume pot products and plants via a license or permit for people to conduct an illegal activity legally. And for this privilege of conducting the illegal act made legal by permission, the government creates bureaucracy and needs taxation to fund it.

Of course, government has also regulated the use of alternative fuels and energies, forcing the population into a collective dependency (addiction) upon oil and gasoline. California, for instance, among other taxes charges 2 cent per gallon state UST fee (gasoline and diesel), and a 2.25% state sales tax for gasoline, a 9.42% state sales tax for diesel, including local taxes, for an average total of $.32 per gallon.

In California, anywhere from 7-9 million gallons of gasoline are used on average per day. The taxation potential here is obviously great, at over $2 million in “gas-sales-tax” per day for governments.

Who pays the taxes?

Hint: It’s not the oil companies or the gas stations…

And now, the government has the audacity to tax people who are sick and need medical treatment, with the “pharmacuitical and medical device tax“, which will be passed on to sick and dying consumers by these corporations:

As part of the recently enacted Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) – known to most as Healthcare Reform Legislation, new taxes will be imposed on manufacturers of “branded prescription drugs” and most medical devices. These taxes are in addition to the fees already charged by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for review of full new drug applications for drugs and 510(k)’s and Premarket Approval Applications for medical devices. And unlike user fees, the taxes will not be paid to FDA but assessed by the Department of Treasury and paid to support health insurance coverage.

The Pharmaceutical Tax

Unlike the medical device tax, the new tax on pharmaceuticals is complicated at best, and convoluted at worst. It applies only to “branded prescription drugs”, which are defined as any product approved under Section 505(b) of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FFDCA”) that bears an Rx legend required by Section 503(b) of the FFDCA; the only exception is an orphan drug approved only for orphan indications. Generic drug sales are excluded, as those drugs are approved under Section 505(j) of the FFDCA; Rx products approved under Section 505(b)(2), of FFDCA, although quasi-generic in nature, are, however, subject to the tax.

These fees will not be paid to FDA, but will be transferred by Treasury Department to the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund set up by PPACA to support health insurance coverage. The tax will first be paid in 2012 for the year 2011. The law requires the payment date be no later than September 30th of each year, which is the Federal Government fiscal year end.

The fee computation is convoluted. It goes like this. The fee is calculated by determining first “the percentage of sales taken into account.” If the aggregate sales of a company’s “branded prescription drugs” are less than $5 million, the percent is 0%.  If between $5 million and $125 million, then it is 10%.  If between $125 million and $225 million, then it is 75%.  If more than $400 million, then it is 100%.  See Section 9008(a)(2) of the PPACA.  The fee is then calculated based on a company’s percent amount of all manufacturers “sales taken into account”, as that percent of an “applicable amount” for each year-which is as follows:

2011 – 2.5 billion

2012 – 2.8 billion

2013 – 2.8 billion

2014 – 3 billion

2015 – 3 billion

2016 – 3 billion

2017 – 4 billion

2018 – 4 billion

2019 – after – 2.8 billion.

See Section 9008(a)(4) of PPACA.  The “sales taken into account” are based on reporting by government agencies (HHS, Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense) to the Department of Treasury and by any other source available to them. There are no new reporting obligations on pharmaceutical manufacturers.  The fees are considered excise taxes treated under Section 275(a)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code. The law requires the Treasury Department to publish guidance “necessary to carry out the purpose of this Section”. Section 9008(i)…

There are numerous potential issues raised by the scheme, foremost among them is how a pharmaceutical company can verify the validity of the information on which the tax is based, since it is not self reported – but reported to Treasury by HHS, Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense. In addition, the law states that if more than one person is liable for payment of a tax, all such persons are jointly and severally liable for payment of the tax. See Section 9008(d)(3).

(Source: http://www.fdalawblog.com/2010/04/articles/legislation/new-taxes-for-pharmaceutical-and-medical-device-manufacturersimportersdistributors/)

–≈–

It’s bad enough that corporations purchase and manufacture goods at what are called “wholesale” prices without paying any taxation on those purchases. But this insult gets turned into injury when these same corporations then “resell” those goods to the people – and charge the people what is officially called a “sales tax”.

But in reality, a more accurately descriptive word for this so-called “sales tax” would be a “seller’s tax”.

You see, corporations have been dodging taxes for decades, utilizing the government approved forced collection of these “sales taxes” that they (the corporations, not the consumers) owe to federal, state, and local governments as the seller of products in exchange for U.S. Dollars, making the sales tax more of an “income tax” to be paid by the corporation selling the good or service, which is then legally passed along to the consumer.

It isn’t the tangible goods sold in these retail stores that are being taxed – it is the legal tender transaction; a tax for the “right” (privilege) to use the government’s (Federal Reserve’s) printed and copyrighted money (notes). For example, 10% of the metal or plastic that makes up the body or motor of an automobile cannot be taken for the tax of purchasing and acquiring the car. The same goes for an apple, a house, or any other product that gets bought or traded. Likewise, a “service” cannot be taxed, leaving only 90% of the service for the purchasers use. A home, for instance, cannot logically be left 10% unpainted to pay for taxation.

And so the usurious bankers we call government had to develop an alternative…

Thus, a currency in the form of U.S. Dollars (legal tender) was created to be used in all transactions, and a tax could then be applied when that monopolized currency was exchanged for the product or service. Since the product or service, as a tangible thing, cannot be quartered and picked apart to pay the tax, it should be obvious to anyone reading this that the “sales tax” only applies to the legally owned and bound currency that is used in the transaction to acquire the tangible product or service.

This means that the sales tax is actually a “seller’s” tax, as the entity that sold the tangible product or service is the entity receiving an income of U.S. Dollars – a taxable income based on copyrighted notes that require a fee in the form of a tax for their use. It’s kind of like the music industry, where record companies receive a royalties from the people for using its copyrighted songs. Every time the song is played (dollar is spent) a royalty (tax) is paid. And in less than one week, one single dollar bill can produce double or triple its face value in taxation. Think about that for a moment…

To make this even more clear, we can compare sales tax to the income or capital gains taxes…

Income or capital gains, as defined by the IRS code, is the gain of assets that are valued in legal tender – the U.S. Dollar. For instance, a 25% income tax of your wages of $50,000 will equal $12,500 in income tax. This is a tax on the dollars that were payed to you for your contracted services to someone or something else. And because corporations really have no other legal choice but to use the dollar as a wage, the monopolistic forced use of this legal tender comes with a price; a tax. Again the music industry can be compared to this system, where radio stations will only play certain songs and promote certain bands, creating a monopoly on whose product (songs) get played mainstream, thus insuring that only a select few record companies will receive those royalties. There is no real competition. Likewise, a capital gains tax on the sale of a stock is calculated by the value of U.S. Dollars earned upon the selling (cashing in) of your corporation stock in exchange for (valued in) legal tender U.S. Dollars – even if you never put your hands on those actual physical dollar bills.

The “sales tax” is levied upon the legal tender U.S. Dollar amount earned by the seller. In contrast, a tax is not levied upon the purchaser of that stock or product you sold, just as your original purchase of that stock or product before selling it was not a taxable transaction – because the stock certificate, product, or service itself cannot be cut in portions to pay tax, and the stock certificate itself and taking possession of it is not what was being taxed. The legal tender that was paid for that stock or product was taxed by government to the seller of the stock that you bought, paid in U.S. Dollars or their foreign equivalent valued in U.S. legal tender. This, again, is a “seller’s” tax.

No legal tender earned = no taxation.

This is why making gold, silver, or any other form of trade or a bartering tool a “legal tender” is one of the stupidest ideas I’ve ever heard in the “patriot” movement. The last thing anyone (but government) should want is to be forced to pay taxes on gold and silver.

Imagine buying gold bars or coins with U.S. dollars when gold is also considered a “legal tender”. The government could then tax both the gold and the U.S. Dollars used to pay for that gold as a double sales tax. So the gold would be taxed for the buyer and receiver of the gold, and the seller would be taxed for the receivership of U.S. Dollars.

Which “patriot” thought of that idea? I’d watch out for that dude…

So what about the regular old sales tax at a department store?

When you give a corporation your hard earned wages to pay for “sales tax”, for which you legally contracted with the United States to receive as legal tender for payment of your “employment”; the services you provide for a wage paid in legal tender U.S. Dollars – you are giving that corporation what is left over from the income and other taxation that was automatically withheld from your paycheck by government for your convenience. You are charged this income tax because you are receiving this copyrighted currency belonging to government as “income” instead of some non-taxable thing like walnuts or coal, whereas the person or corporation paying you that legal tender pays nothing for the privilege of using those U.S. Dollars. The corporation you work for sells the products or services of your labor as an employee while passing the tax on to its customers. Then, the corporation pays you with this tax-free money and pays no taxes for receiving your services as an employee. This actually makes you (as the employee) the seller, as you have sold your services to your employer in exchange for legal tender under contract. The only difference here is that the people “employees” of these corporations don’t have the “privilege” of  forcing their “employers” to pay that tax as a “sales tax” like corporations do to their customers. Quite the opposite really… as government has created a criminal punishment for “tax evaders” who lawfully do not wish to consent to that income or sales tax. Whereas, for corporations, government created laws that allow and support them in their tax evasion purposes, by “requiring” corporations to pass on and collect their own “seller’s tax” (tax on the dollars they earn) to the people (consumers of the corporation’s products). And these stores will even call the police if you refuse to pay the “sales tax” that is actually their own “seller’s tax” to pay! The people go to jail while the tax evading corporation continues to sell to consumers tax-free, by forcing its customers to pay the corporations own taxation on its income of legal tender earned.

And this is why I support “alternative” currencies and bartering…

The only way to break the stranglehold and price-fixing/over-pricing of a monopoly is to create alternative choices. If people had the choice of using a non-taxable piece of paper as opposed to a taxable piece of paper, things would be a lot different. Heck, it might even bring back that old concept of competition!

But instead, people get arrested and thrown in jail for doing that.

If for some reason this concept is lost on you, let’s prove the point.

The Web Site of the New York State Society of CPAs states:

“For example, in the Borders Online case, California required Borders Online to collect sales tax because, among other things, its customers were permitted to make returns at the separately owned and operated Borders bookstores located throughout California [Borders Online, LLC v. State Board of Equalization, 129 Cal.App.4th 1179 (2005)]. Even though the Borders bookstores were not typical sales agents and were not directly involved in the selling process, the court held that the ability of customers to make returns at physical locations in California assisted in the sales process. Accordingly, the court held that Borders bookstores were Online’s representatives for the purpose of selling goods in California. (Border’s) Online was assessed more than $150,000 in tax for prior periods based on its relationship with Borders bookstores.

(Source: http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2008/808/essentials/p48.htm)

Notice here that it was not each former individual consumer that was assessed a tax after they made their purchases, but was instead the true responsible party for the receiver of taxable legal tender – the corporation selling non-taxable physical products or services to consumers. Again, only the privilege of the use/acceptance of the dollar is taxed. Thus, because Borders Online received “legal tender” in exchange for its products, the “seller’s tax” was assessed to Borders Online – not the consuming people as customers – and the corporation is liable whether it “collects” the taxes from the people or not.

If Borders Online would have collected these taxes that Border’s itself owed from its sales as is usually the case, then Borders Online would have paid no taxes for its sales and for conducting business across the entire United States and indeed the world economy. So most corporations buy tax-free and then re-sell tax-free (by passing its seller’s tax onto the people and calling it sales tax).

The report also explains:

“Forty-five states and the District of Columbia impose a sales tax. If a business should have collected sales tax from its customers but did not, the business (and, in many cases, its owners) may be required to pay the tax on all taxable sales made in the state from the inception of the business activity in such state, plus interest and penalties…”

(Source above)

Now, the protagonist argument certainly could be made that the consumer would likely end up paying higher prices for products anyway as most corporations (sellers) would probably hike up their regular every-day prices in order to meet the taxation demand put on them by government. But that same detractor just might have forgotten about the concept of competition – of alternative currencies. For if a seller accepts gold, silver, copper, brass, seashells, sticks, stones, favors, or non-governmental tax-free alternative paper currencies in the first place, then the taxation game goes away altogether.

But government doesn’t much like that idea either, for competition would destroy its power of revenue generation called taxation.

And so, government has created the trap called “incorporation”, whereby people may incorporate their businesses in order to receive special tax-breaks, write-offs, and other government “benefits” – so long as they play along with the government extortion racket and force their customers to pay for the taxation revenue generation scheme of government. The incorporated people charge the other people for the taxes that the incorporated people owe to government, becoming the worst kind of assistants to tyranny.

History shows that when considering the disposition of people in slavery, the slave that does his master’s bidding and rules over the other slaves of his master’s plantation without consciousness becomes the more privileged house-slave, able to enjoy just a few more benefits than the other slaves. And so business owners have followed suit…

And to think, all of this could simply be avoided if the people and businesses of America would simply boycott the use of government’s two enslavement tools – State incorporation and the Federal Reserve Note.

Until then, when and indeed if the people ever collectively wake up to see their own enslavement to a copyrighted currency that they don’t ever own even while they possess it in their wallets and in their bank accounts, we people shall continue to pay the taxes that rightfully should be paid by corporations. And the people will continue to believe that the “national debt” is their own, instead of the government corporation who created it through its Federal Reserve banking scheme of usury by implied consent, even though it isn’t even the people’s money in the first place!

And corporations like General Electric will continue to pay no income taxes to support the countries and people it calls customers while earning billions in profits.

P.S… This writing is dedicated to all of the oxy-morons out there that think citizenship and a national currency somehow equals sovereignty for themselves as individuals.

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, December 1st, 2012

Child Abuse Sponsored By Government


There are many subjects that I have come across in my now decade of researching, but none are more disturbing and mentally debilitating as the severely under-reported reality of child ritual abuse, trafficking, rape, and murder.

I am ashamed to say that I stay away from this subject for this very reason, for I am cursed with what I call hyper-empathy.

I feel…

Though I do not get my hopes up that this will be the breakthrough coverage that will turn the tide and wake up the masses to what is happening within the government, its investment held corporations, and its protecting court system that never hears these cases without dismissal, I do hope it creates some momentum within even the most ardent truth-seekers.

When I talk to people and they ask me why I care so much about so much that I don’t see with my own eyes or feel with my own feelers, I can only try to enunciate my hyper-sensitivity to what is the reality of the society we live in, and its darkest, deepest bowels that go unnoticed while most people work two jobs just to survive.

My question to them is, How can you live comfortably knowing that this is happening?

And I fear the unspoken answer…

In a world where we do not stand up for others, where child ritual abuse and rape are more prevalent than anyone not in the know can imagine, I am happy to present this mainstream news interview (from Canada) that will likely not be replayed in the United States – the true hotbed for child porn, rape, and abuse.

Dare I hope that the people will rise up against this organized crime outfit called government, if only to protect the children for which government pretends to protect while doing the unthinkable?

This syndicated interview is the tip of a very large iceberg…


.

–Clint Richardson (RealityBloger.wordpress.com)
–Sunday, November 25, 2012

My Concession For The Procession Of Imbeciles


That’s right, folks… I lost. I will not be president of the United States.

I will not be president for one and only one reason this term:

–≈–

“The presidential candidate with the most royal genes and chromosomes has, up to now, always won the White House…”

–Burke’s Peerage researchers

–≈–

“[Bush] is closely related to every European Monarch both on and off the throne… Not one member of his family was working class, middle class, or even middle, middle class…”

–Harold Brooks-Baker, Burke’s Peerage publishing director–

http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=82279&page=1

–≈–

“Believe it or not, Mitt Romney and George W. Bush are cousins — 10th cousins, twice removed, that is.”

“Romney is actually related to six past presidents — more than any other 2012 GOP contestant. Franklin D. Roosevelt is his eighth cousin, twice removed, and both Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover are his 10th cousins. Then there is his sixth cousin (four times removed) Franklin Pierce, and both 10th cousins Bush I and II. Three out of these six were even (gasp!) Democrats.”

–Time Magazine–

–≈–

“Obama and Palin are 10th cousins through a common ancestor named John Smith… As for [Rush] Limbaugh, he’s also a 10th cousin of the president – one time removed…”

“President George W. Bush? He’s related to both Obama and Palin, the site found. Obama and Bush are 11th cousins through common ancestor Samuel Hinckley, and Bush and Palin are 10th cousins one time removed, also through Hinckley – who, and stay with us now, was John Smith’s father-in-law.”

“Obama is related to investor Warren Buffett and actor Brad Pitt.”

“Palin, the former Alaska governor and Republican vice presidential candidate, is a distant cousin of both Franklin D. Roosevelt and Princess Diana.”

“In 2007, Cheney’s wife, Lynne, discovered ancestral ties between former Vice President Dick Cheney and Obama while researching her book. She said the relationship was eighth cousin…”

“Palin is distant cousins with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and conservative author and pundit Ann Coulter…”

–Ancestry.com, via Anastasia Tyler–

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-distant-cousins-palin-limbaugh-bush

–≈–

“[Bush’s] royal kin include Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen Mother, Duchess Sarah “Fergy” Ferguson and even the late Princess Diana.  His most prominent ancestor may be England’s King Charles II”

“Bill Clinton and Bob Dole have more in common than wanting to be president. They are distant cousins! However, Clinton has bluer blood, giving him an election edge”

“Bill Clinton was born William Jefferson Blythe, but took his stepfather’s name as a teenager. Clinton’s ancestry can be traced back, on his mother’s side, to King Henry III who ruled England from 1227 to 1272. He is descended from King Robert I of France. Furthermore, he is related to every Scottish monarch to the current British royal family… Clinton is related to every ancient aristocratic family in Britain today.”

“As for John Kerry, “the 60-year-old can trace his roots back to the first Massachusetts governor, John Winthrop, to every great family in Boston and to a host of royals in Europe. Kerry can almost certainly be traced back to King James I and to the bloodlines straight through the Windsor and Hanover families,” Brooks-Baker said. “But both candidates have a remarkable number of royal connections
and both are related to Queen Elizabeth.”

http://thecounterpunch.hubpages.com/hub/Nearly-all-US-Presidents-are-descendant-from-the-British-and-French-Royal-Families

–≈–

“President George W. Bush and Sen. John Kerry are related. Well, sort of. They’re ninth cousins, twice removed. So what’s a little competition between family?”

“Playboy founder Hugh Hefner, who is the ninth cousin of both men… Twice removed from Mr. Bush, Hefner is a slightly closer relation to Kerry, only once removed.”

“Well I feel closer to Senator Kerry,” Hefner chuckled, over the phone from the Playboy Mansion in Los Angeles.”

“You know I’m an 11th generation direct descendant of William Bradford, who came over on the Mayflower, a direct descendant of a puritan,” Hefner continued proudly, finding no irony in the fact. “I suppose that it is not a big surprise but it is certainly unique to be a relation to both candidates.”

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-250_162-604163.html

–≈–

Now I could go on, and on, and on here… and I could show you that all prominent politicians and their wives, historians, queens and kings, Hollywood actors, authors, poets, and any other influential person in history and politics is always a bloodline member. I could even tell you that the truth is that George Bush is the 9th cousin of his own mother Barbara Peirce, as is common in keeping the bloodline pure.

But what’s the use?

The procession of Imbeciles continues deep into the night as Americans vote; then rushing home to turn to their favorite bloodline cousin in the news to tell them that their fake-popular vote did indeed make a difference, and that democracy works in America.

Of course, the typical American imbecile doesn’t understand how the presidential elections work through the electoral college.

The Washington Post wrote on Sunday:

“This year, once again, Americans are confronted with the distinct possibility that the winner of a tight presidential race might not be the candidate who received the most votes…

The electoral college is the system the country has – and has had for centuries – an institution that should be adjusted only with extreme care.

Meanwhile, if today’s election produces a split between the popular and the electoral votes, Americans should keep their cool.

Both candidates accepted and played by the current rules, byzantine as they are. The popular vote will be a byproduct of a contest in which both sides spent time, energy, and money to win the most electoral votes.

As in every presidential election since George Washington’s first, the candidate who achieves that constitutionally prescribed goal will be the legitimate president-elect.”

***In case you missed that, the Washington Post just told you that your vote means absolutely JACK-SHIT, and that the 538 electors (1 per congressman) will decide who your president will be.

–≈–

And for those who don’t know what the government and your bloodline rulers mean when they call you an imbecile, here is the legal definition for your understanding:

IMBECILITY, med. jur. A weakness of the mind, caused by the absence or obliteration of natural or acquired ideas; or it is described to be an abnormal deficiency either in those faculties which acquaint us with the qualities and ordinary relations of things, or in those which furnish us with the moral motives that regulate our relations and conduct towards our fellow men. It is frequently attended with excessive activity. of one or more of the animal propensities.

2. Imbecility differs from idiocy in this, that the subjects of the former possess some intellectual capacity, though inferior in degree to that possessed by the great mass of mankind; while those of the latter are utterly destitute of reason. Imbecility differs also from stupidity. (q. v.) The former consists in a defect of the mind, which renders it unable to examine the data presented to it by the senses, and therefrom to deduce the correct judgment; that is, a defect of intensity, or reflective power. The latter is occasioned by a want of intensity, or perceptive power.

3. There are various degrees of this disease. It has been attempted to classify the degrees of imbecility, but the careful observer of nature will perhaps be soon satisfied that the shades of difference between one species and another, are almost imperceptible.

–≈–

So good luck American imbeciles…

You did your patriotic duty and voted for what you believe is the lesser of two evils – despite the fact that the spawn of evil has been ever-present since the birth of this country (the bloodline were even the signers the constitution and Declaration of Independence – cousins of the King of England that is – placing Americans into permanent debt to the bloodline).

As for my prediction of who will be the winner in this 2012 presidential election?

Why, the bloodline, of course… no matter who wins!

But it does appear that Mitt Romney has more royal bloodline connections than Obama this year, and so my best guess would be Romney.

See the Romney pedigree here, as proudly displayed by the Mormon Church (Romney is cousins with all past Mormon Presidents, by the way, as are all United States Presidents):

http://img102.fansshare.com/pic127/w/non-celebrity/1200/21259_hutchinson_pedigree.jpg

And the extended Delano/Howland chart:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_3Nq4V6ez3vg/TNdR-KBc7NI/AAAAAAAAAME/PaLJyBg78Ss/s1600/Howland%20Pedigree.jpg

A list of most presidents and their genealogical relationship to each other (note that all U.S. Presidents are cousins of George Washington, cousin of the bloodline royalty of England and the world):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogical_relationships_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States

And finally, a list of just some of the cousins of John Kerry and George Bush:

http://www.familyforest.com/Kerry_Bush_Cousins.html

–≈–

One last thing…

Before you dismiss this as coincidence or 6 degrees of separation as the media tells you to, here is what “Jewels of the Crown” says, from “A newsletter of the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne in the United States of America”:

“Many Americans who descend from certain 17th century American colonists, known as “gateways” are able to prove descent from the royal houses of Europe…

“More than 20 American Presidents, including the current one, are believed to have royal ancestry, and thus, in all probability, also have Charlemagne ancestry. President Obama’s “gateway” ancestor, Martha Eltonhead (Mrs. Edwin Conway), is shared with President James Madison…”

“It should be noted that Americans whose ancestors came from continental Europe in the colonial period and the 19th Century are unlikely to easily delineate descent from Charlemagne in their background. There was a separation of classes in Europe and the blood of the rulers seldom flowed legitimately into the blood of the nobility and commoners…”

“The search for new gateway ancestors and new lines to validate former gateway ancestors continues on a pace. In my own case I have seen Thomas Bradbury accepted only to fall from grace more than twice. He’s back in Tracy’s book, but I don’t know for how long. So tell your Bradbury descendants to join now while the going is good.”

“Annual Meeting “Le Bal des Royals” (in Washington D.C)

The meeting was called to order by Dr. Hardwick Smith Johnson, Jr., President General of the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne in the United States of America together with Richard A. Gregory, President General of the Order of the Merovingian Dynasty at 7:30 p.m. for this combined meeting of both Orders. 160 members and guests were present for this combined meeting.

The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America was recited and the Invocation given by the Rev. Dr. Christopher Mark Agnew, Chaplain General of the OCC.

***Note that the “Flag” of the United States corporation is the same as the crown’s “East India Company” (Corporation) flag pre-United States:

http://flagspot.net/flags/gb-eic.html

–≈–

America is a lie, folks!

Wake up, or stay enslaved to this international kingdom and corporation!!!

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Election day, Tuesday, November 6th, 2012

For Iran: An Inconvenient Truth


It’s hard to imagine a more true statement than that which was made by economist Patrick Clawson. Here we watch in horror as this arrogant warmonger candidly eludes to a list of “false flag” attacks which led to World War 2, WW1, Vietnam, and the Civil War, and for which the same tactics will ultimately need to be used to thrust the United States into war with Iran (an undeclared, illegal occupation that is)…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M84l19H68mk&feature=player_embedded

So who is this guy anyway, and what is that written behind him?

Let’s play connect the dots, shall we?

Patrick Clawson is a former economist for the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and senior economist with the World Bank. Clawson is currently the Director for Research at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and senior editor of “Middle East Quarterly“.

The Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) is a tax-exempt Washington think tank focused on U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East. WINEP is continuously referred to as pro-Israel. In fact, its founder was Martin Indyk, former deputy director of research for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), one of if not the largest Jewish lobbying groups in America. Indyk became a duel-American-Israeli citizen, U.S. diplomat, and its ambassador to Israel. The list of names as trustees of WINEP are the top Zionist Jewish propaganda, banking, and attorney machine – which as of 2005 included
Democratic senator Frank Lautenberg, managing editor of The New York Times Jill Abramson, real estate developer A. Alfred Taubman, and philanthropist Edgar Bromfman.

On its Mission & History web-page, the following quotes can be found:

“In war and in peace, the Institute’s efforts to articulate a coherent and realistic view of U.S. national interests has assisted policymakers, in and out of government, to make informed decisions about the Middle East.”  –President Bill Clinton

“Your hard work and commitment to the spread of freedom strengthen our Nation and help make the world a safer and more peaceful place.”  –President George W. Bush

(Note: grammar is as printed on WINEP website.)

It goes on to confirm the infiltration and penetration of this group into not only the United States, but as well in the middle-East:

“The Washington Institute accesses the policy process from many angles: the written word, the spoken word, and personal contact. The Institute’s senior research staff includes experts on a wide array of political, military, security, and economic issues that cover every corner of the Middle East. They speak the region’s languages, have lived and worked there, and often hail from the region itself. We are proud of the long list of Institute “alumni” who have gone on to serve in virtually every arm of government that plays a role in Middle East policymaking including the National Security Council, State Department, Pentagon, and intelligence community.

Every business day, Institute scholars and associates are quoted in major American or international media, appear on the op-ed pages of elite newspapers, or are interviewed on network television and radio news programs. Interpreting the complexities of the Middle East for both general and elite audiences is one of our most important functions.

And Institute publications — from policy briefs to full-length monographs — are widely recognized as “must-reading” for officials, diplomats, and journalists in Washington and around the world. They provide “instant analysis” of breaking events as well as thoughtful, long-range assessments of trends in the shaping of future policy.

Through all of these avenues of access, the Institute seeks to inject dispassionate, research-driven analysis — supported by fact and expertise — into the making of U.S. Middle East policy…”

Our Mission

The mission of The Washington Institute is to advance a balanced and realistic understanding of American interests in the Middle East and to promote the policies that secure them.

The Washington Institute is a 501(c)(3) organization. All donations are tax deductible…

Their (founders of WINEP) mission was simple yet powerful: to inject the power of ideas and the discipline of scholarship into the making of U.S. Middle East policy.”

(Source: http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/about/mission-and-history)

Since AIPAC is so busy influencing the U.S. Congress; its main focus… WINEP is there to focus more on the Executive Branch and its many cabinets and government-owned corporations. Both groups obviously heavily influence the media. In fact, this webpage continues by describing its own publication, of which Patrick Clawson edits and speaks on behalf of here, as:

Middle East Quarterly, published since 1994 and edited by Efraim Karsh, it is the only scholarly journal on the Middle East consistent with mainstream American views. Delivering timely analysis, cutting-edge information, and sound policy initiatives, it serves as a valuable resource for policymakers and opinion-shapers.”

I don’t know about you, but I’d sure like to see a definition for “opinion-shapers“, and whether they are shaping the opinions of the “policymakers”.

Howard Sachar, founder of Brandeis University’s Jacob Hiatt Institute in Jerusalem, editor-in-chief of the 39-volume The Rise of Israel: A documentary history, and member of the advisory council of the pro-Israel lobby, “J Street”, described Efraim Karsh as the “preeminent scholar-spokesman of the Revisionist Movement in Zionism.”

Daniel Pipes, founder of Middle East Forum, described Efraim Karsh as “the preeminent historian of the modern Middle East writing today.”

“Middle East Quarterly”, edited by Patrick Clawson (the speaker in the above video eluding to a false flag attack on Iran as a prelude to war), is a pro Israel journal published by the Middle East Forum.

The Forum is tax-exempt, and its address was care of  C/O “Abrahams Lowenstein” according to IRS filings and letters of organization into a 501 (c) (3) corporation.

The Middle East Forum is obviously dripping with Jewish blood – yet another tax-exempt Israeli lobby and think tank in charge of lobbying Jewish/American peace through war and conquest in the Arab Middle-East. In short, it’s an Orwellian nightmare of a power lobby.

Middle East Forum’s self-described purpose on its own “about” webpage explains:

Founded in 1990, the Middle East Forum (http://www.meforum.org) has been an independent tax-exempt 501(c) (3) nonprofit organization based in Philadelphia since 1994.

Mission

The Middle East Forum promotes American interests in the Middle East and protects the Constitutional order from Middle Eastern threats.

The Forum sees the region — with its profusion of dictatorships, radical ideologies, existential conflicts, border disagreements, corruption, political violence, and weapons of mass destruction — as a major source of problems for the United States. Accordingly, it urges active measures to protect Americans and their allies.

“U.S. interests in the Middle East include fighting radical Islam; working for Palestinian acceptance of Israel; robustly asserting U.S. interests vis-à-vis Saudi Arabia; and developing strategies to deal with Iraq and contain Iran.”

“Domestically, the Forum combats lawful Islamism; protects the freedom of public speech of anti-Islamist authors, activists, and publishers; and works to improve Middle East studies in North America.”

(Note that it is quite illegal to publicly speak of holocaust denial or anti-Israel speech in many countries, and as close to home as Canada. Thus, protecting only anti-Islamic “speech” in America, which is not illegal in those same countries that outlaw anti-Jewish speech, should be a good indication that the United States is undeniably influenced by Jewish/Zionist interests exclusive of pro-Islamic points of view – especially with the above listed influence of this “Forum” over policy and opinion-makers.)

Methods

The Middle East Forum realizes its goals through three main mechanisms:

  1. Intellectual: The Forum provides context, insights, and policy recommendations through the Middle East Quarterly, staff writings, public lectures, radio and television appearances, and conference calls (see below for details).
  2. Operational: The Forum exerts an active influence through its projects, including Campus Watch, Islamist Watch, Legal Project, and Washington Project (see below for details).
  3. Philanthropic: The Forum annually distributes US$2 million in earmarked donations through its Education Fund, helping researchers, writers, investigators, and activists around the world.

(Source: http://www.meforum.org/about.php)

–=–

Need I go on…?

The collective inaction and denial of the American people as to the control, lobbying wealth, and binding influence of the Jewish, Israeli, and Zionist power structure must come to an end. This is not the people’s war, but a clandestine ancient struggle of a once nomadic, usurious parasite of a people to rule over their own declared greater Israel, and about whom the bible tells:

“I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.” –Revelation 2:9

This “synagogue of satan” inhabits our government, our media, and our country as duel-citizens of this nation and of the false one they themselves created over Palestine and its people. This is Henry Ford’s “International Jew” – citizens of all states. It’s influence knows no bounds, and its control feels little resistance.

And so I end this with my own humble apology to the people of Iraq, of Afghanistan, of the other over 50 countries victimized and bombed by our Zionist, facist government, and most of all to Iran – the final prize of this International Synagogue of Satan. I give you my sincere condolences and share your disgust with my own people, who idly and without empathy allow this to happen with the American peoples consent – a consent gained by lies and manipulation; manufactured acquiescence to a many century-old grudge match and desire to rule the collective world-wide goy.

I’m sorry, for we the people in America have no excuses except for our blatant ignorance and lack of empathy for your millions of dead children, women, and men. And perhaps our greatest obstacle – hope that things will get better, while believing that hope is a substitute for action – is our downfall.

And so to our future false flag attack on you, be it a political suprise in October or a prelude to illegal occupation in later months, I can only say that I am personally sorry, and that if anything, I tried.

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, September 27th, 2012